Bausch & Lomb Corp

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Overview

Bausch + Lomb Corporation (“Bausch + Lomb” or the “Company”) is a leading global eye health company dedicated to protecting and enhancing the gift of sight for millions of people around the world – from the moment of birth through every phase of life. The Company operates inthree reportable segments: (i) Vision Care segment which includes both a contact lens business and a consumer eye care business that consists of contact lens care products, over-the-counter (“OTC”) eye drops and eye vitamins, (ii) Pharmaceuticals segment which consists of a broad line of proprietary and generic pharmaceutical products for post-operative treatments and treatments for a number of eye conditions, such as glaucoma, eye inflammation, ocular hypertension, dry eyes and retinal diseases and (iii) Surgical segment which consists of medical device equipment, consumables, instruments and technologies for the treatment of cataracts, corneal and vitreous and retinal eye conditions, which includes intraocular lenses (“IOLs”) and delivery systems, phacoemulsification equipment and other surgical instruments and devices necessary for ophthalmic surgery. See Note 17, “SEGMENT INFORMATION” for additional information regarding these reportable segments.

Bausch + Lomb is a subsidiary of Bausch Health Companies Inc. (“BHC”), with BHC directly or indirectly holding 310,449,643 Bausch + Lomb common shares, which represents approximately 88% of the issued and outstanding common shares of Bausch + Lomb, as of October 22, 2025. On August 6, 2020, BHC announced its plan to separate our eye health business into an independent publicly traded entity, separate from the remainder of BHC (the “Separation”). This resulted in the initial public offering of Bausch + Lomb (the “B+L IPO”), and our common shares began trading on the New York Stock Exchange and the Toronto Stock Exchange, in each case under the ticker symbol “BLCO”, on May 6, 2022.

Bausch + Lomb understands that BHC continues to believe that completing the Separation, which may include the transfer of all or a portion of BHC’s remaining direct or indirect equity interest in Bausch + Lomb to its shareholders (the “Distribution”), the monetization of all or a portion of BHC’s ownership interest in Bausch + Lomb, the sale of the Company (a “Sale Transaction”) or a combination thereof, makes strategic sense and that BHC continues to evaluate all relevant factors and considerations related to completing the Separation, including those factors described in BHC’s public filings. The Distribution is subject to the achievement of targeted debt leverage ratios and the completion of the Separation is subject to the receipt of any applicable shareholder and other necessary approvals and other factors and is subject to various risk factors. There can be no assurance that the Separation will be consummated, the form any such consummated Separation would take or that a Distribution or Sale Transaction will occur as part of that Separation or that even if consummated, we will realize the anticipated benefits from the Separation.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The unaudited financial statements for all periods presented are referred to as “Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements”, and have been prepared by the Company in United States (“U.S.”) dollars and in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial reporting and pursuant to the rules and regulations for reporting on Form 10-Q, which do not conform in all respects to the requirements of U.S. GAAP for annual financial statements. Accordingly, certain information and disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for complete Consolidated Financial Statements are not included herein. Accordingly, these notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP that are contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Canadian Securities Administrators (the “CSA”) on February 19, 2025. The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared using accounting policies that are consistent with the policies used in preparing the Company’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2024. The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s financial position and results of operations for the interim periods. The operating results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year.

Following the B+L IPO, certain functions that BHC provided to Bausch + Lomb prior to the B+L IPO were provided and, in some limited cases, continue to be provided to Bausch + Lomb by BHC under a Transition Services Agreement (the “TSA”) or are performed using Bausch + Lomb’s own resources or third-party service providers. See Note 4, “RELATED PARTIES” for further information regarding agreements between Bausch + Lomb and BHC.

Use of Estimates

In preparing the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions. The estimates and assumptions used by the Company affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.

All estimates in these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are based on assumptions that management believes are reasonable. On an ongoing basis, management reviews its estimates to ensure that these estimates appropriately reflect changes in the Company’s business and new information as it becomes available. If historical experience and other factors used by management to make these estimates do not reasonably reflect future activity, the Company’s business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations could be materially impacted.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

There were no new accounting standards adopted during the nine months ended September 30, 2025.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards, Not Adopted as of September 30, 2025

In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which requires disclosure of disaggregated income taxes paid, prescribes standard categories for the components of the effective tax rate reconciliation, and modifies other income tax-related disclosures. The ASU is effective for the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2025. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU to have an impact on its consolidated financial statements, other than with respect to expanded disclosures.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, which requires disclosure of specified information about certain costs and expenses. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on its disclosures.

In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets, which provides guidance for estimating credit losses under the current expected credit losses (CECL) model for current accounts receivable and current contract assets arising from transactions accounted for under Accounting Standards Codification 606. The guidance is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2025 and will be adopted prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU.

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software. This ASU amends the existing standard to remove all references to software development project stages and requires entities to start capitalizing software costs when both of the following occur: (i) management has authorized and committed to funding the software project and (ii) it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function intended. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year. The amendments can be applied prospectively, retrospectively, or via a modified prospective transition method. The Company is evaluating the impact of adoption on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

3. REVENUE RECOGNITION

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s revenues are primarily generated from product sales in the therapeutic areas of eye health that consist of: (i) branded prescription eye-medications and pharmaceuticals, (ii) generic and branded generic prescription eye medications and pharmaceuticals, (iii) OTC vitamin and supplement products and (iv) medical devices (contact lenses, IOLs and ophthalmic surgical equipment). Other revenues include alliance and service revenue from the licensing and co-promotion of products and contract service revenue. Contract service revenue is derived primarily from contract manufacturing for third parties and is not material. See Note 17, “SEGMENT INFORMATION” for the disaggregation of revenues.

The Company recognizes revenue when the customer obtains control of promised goods or services and in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this core principle, the Company applies the five-step revenue model to contracts within its scope: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.

Product Sales

A contract with the Company’s customers exists for each product sale. Where a contract with a customer contains more than one performance obligation, the Company allocates the transaction price to each distinct performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price. The transaction price is adjusted for variable consideration which is discussed further below. The Company recognizes revenue for product sales at a point in time, when the customer obtains control of the products in accordance with contracted delivery terms, which is generally upon shipment or customer receipt. Contracted delivery terms will vary by customer and geography. In the U.S., control is generally transferred to the customer upon receipt.

Revenue from sales of surgical equipment and related software is generally recognized upon delivery and installation of the equipment. IOLs and delivery systems, disposable surgical packs and other surgical instruments are distinct from the surgical equipment and may be sold together with the surgical equipment in a single contract or on a standalone basis. Revenue from the sale of delivery systems, disposable surgical packs and other surgical instruments is recognized in accordance with the contracted delivery terms, generally upon shipment or customer receipt. IOLs are sold primarily on a consignment basis and revenue is recognized upon notification of use.

When a sale transaction in the Surgical segment contains multiple performance obligations, the transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation based on the relative standalone sales price and revenue is recognized upon satisfaction of each performance obligation.

Product Sales Provisions

As is customary in the eye health industry, gross product sales of certain product categories are subject to a variety of deductions in arriving at reported net product sales. The transaction price for such product categories is typically adjusted for variable consideration, which may be in the form of cash discounts, allowances, returns, rebates, chargebacks and distribution fees paid to customers. Provisions for variable consideration are established to reflect the Company’s best estimates of the amount of consideration to which it is entitled based on the terms of the contract. The amount of variable consideration included in the transaction price may be constrained, and is included in the net sales price only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of the cumulative revenue recognized will not occur in the future period.

Provisions for these deductions are recorded concurrently with the recognition of gross product sales revenue and include cash discounts and allowances, chargebacks and distribution fees, which are paid to direct customers, as well as rebates and returns, which can be paid to direct and indirect customers. Returns provision balances and volume discounts to direct customers are included in Accrued and other current liabilities. All other provisions related to direct customers are included in Trade receivables, net, while provision balances related to indirect customers are included in Accrued and other current liabilities.

The following tables present the activity and ending balances of the Company’s variable consideration provisions for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024:

Included in Rebates in the table above are cooperative advertising credits due to customers of approximately $33 million and $32 million as of September 30, 2025 and January 1, 2025, respectively, which are reflected as a reduction of Trade receivables, net in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, included in Payments and credits in the table above, are payments made, or to be made, by Novartis, on behalf of the Company for Rebates, in accordance with the agreements associated with the 2023 acquisition of XIIDRA® (lifitegrast ophthalmic solution) and certain other ophthalmology assets (the “XIIDRA Acquisition”).

Included in Rebates in the table above are cooperative advertising credits due to customers of approximately $38 million and $35 million as of September 30, 2024 and January 1, 2024, respectively, which are reflected as a reduction of Trade receivables, net in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, included in Payments and credits in the table above, are payments made, or to be made, by Novartis, on behalf of the Company, in accordance with the agreements associated with the XIIDRA Acquisition in September 2023.

Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities

There are no contract assets for any period presented. Contract liabilities consist of deferred revenue, the balance of which is not material to any period presented.

Allowance for Credit Losses

An allowance is maintained for potential credit losses. The Company estimates the current expected credit loss on its receivables based on various factors, including historical credit loss experience, customer credit worthiness, value of collaterals (if any), and any relevant current and reasonably supportable future economic factors. Additionally, the Company generally estimates the expected credit loss on a pooled basis when customers are deemed to have similar risk characteristics. Trade receivable balances are written off against the allowance when it is deemed probable that the trade receivable will not be collected. Trade receivables, net are stated net of certain sales provisions and the allowance for credit losses.

The activity in the allowance for credit losses for trade receivables for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 is as follows:

4. RELATED PARTIES

Prior to May 10, 2022, Bausch + Lomb had been managed and operated in the ordinary course of business with other affiliates of BHC. On May 10, 2022, Bausch + Lomb became an independent publicly traded company. As of October 22, 2025, BHC directly or indirectly held 310,449,643 common shares of Bausch + Lomb, which represented approximately 88% of the issued and outstanding common shares of Bausch + Lomb.

Additionally, there have been no sales made to related parties for all periods presented.

Accounts Receivable and Payable

Certain transactions between Bausch + Lomb and BHC and affiliate businesses are cash-settled on a current basis and, therefore, are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Amounts payable to BHC and its affiliates related to related party transactions were $15 million and $5 million as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively, and are included within Accounts payable in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Amounts due from BHC and its affiliates related to related party transactions were $12 million and $25 million as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively, of which $5 million and $6 million are included within Prepaid expenses and other current assets and $7 million and $19 million are included within Other non-current assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. These amounts are inclusive of the receivables and payables associated with the separation agreements entered into in connection with the B+L IPO, as discussed below.

Separation Agreement with BHC

In connection with the completion of the B+L IPO, the Company entered into a Master Separation Agreement (the “MSA”), that, together with the other agreements summarized herein, govern the relationship between BHC and the Company following the completion of the B+L IPO.

Other agreements that the Company entered into with BHC that govern aspects of Bausch + Lomb’s relationship with BHC following the B+L IPO include:

•Transition Services Agreement – In connection with the completion of the B+L IPO, Bausch + Lomb has entered into the TSA with BHC to provide each other, on a transitional basis, certain administrative, human resources, treasury and support services and other assistance, for a limited time to help ensure an orderly transition following the B+L IPO. The TSA specifies the calculation of Bausch + Lomb costs and receipts for these services. Under the TSA, Bausch + Lomb has received certain services from BHC, including information technology services, technical and engineering support, application support for operations, legal, payroll, finance, tax and accounting, general administrative services and other support services, and has also provided certain similar services to BHC. Individual services provided under the TSA have been scheduled for a specific period, generally ranging fromsix totwelve months, depending on the nature of the services. As of the date of this filing, most of these transitional services have either expired or been terminated; however, a limited number of these transitional services are still being provided by the parties.

•Tax Matters Agreement – In connection with the completion of the B+L IPO, Bausch + Lomb has entered into a Tax Matters Agreement (the “Tax Matters Agreement”) with BHC that governs the parties’ respective rights, responsibilities and obligations with respect to tax liabilities and benefits, tax attributes, the preparation and filing of tax returns, the control of audits and other tax proceedings and other matters regarding taxes following the B+L IPO.

•Employee Matters Agreement – In connection with the completion of the B+L IPO, Bausch + Lomb has entered into an Employee Matters Agreement with BHC that governs, among other things, the allocation of employee-related liabilities, the mechanics for the transfer of Bausch + Lomb employees, the treatment of outstanding BHC equity awards solely in connection with the Distribution and the treatment of Bausch + Lomb employees’ participation in BHC’s retirement and health and welfare plans. On July 31, 2024, Bausch + Lomb and BHC entered into an Amended and Restated Employee Matters Agreement which, among other things, sets forth revised terms for the treatment of certain BHC equity awards solely in connection with the Distribution.

In addition to the previously discussed agreements, Bausch + Lomb has entered into certain other agreements with BHC including, but not limited to, the Intellectual Property Matters Agreement and the Real Estate Matters Agreement that provide a framework for the ongoing relationship with BHC.

Charges incurred related to the above agreements were $6 million and $5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and are primarily reflected within Selling, general and administrative in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

5. ACQUISITIONS

2025 Acquisitions

Acquisition of Manufacturing Equipment

On September 10, 2025, the Company, through its affiliates, entered into an agreement to acquire certain manufacturing equipment and assets and assume the lease of a manufacturing facility in Mexico. The acquisition is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2025 or first quarter of 2026, subject to receipt of regulatory approval and other customary closing conditions, and will include an upfront cash payment of approximately $75 million due at closing. The acquisition is expected to unlock manufacturing capacity and expand the Company's margins.

Acquisition of Whitecap Biosciences

On January 3, 2025, the Company, through its affiliate, acquired Whitecap Biosciences, LLC, (“Whitecap Biosciences”) for an upfront payment of approximately $28 million and potential future milestone and royalty payments. The acquisition is expected to expand the Company’s clinical-stage pipeline, as Whitecap Biosciences is currently developingtwo innovative therapies for potential use in glaucoma and geographic atrophy. The Company accounted for the transaction as an asset acquisition and during the nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company expensed the upfront payment of approximately $28 million as acquired in-process research development costs, as included within Other expense on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

2024 Acquisitions

Acquisition of Elios Vision

On December 10, 2024, the Company, through its affiliate, acquired Elios Vision, Inc. (“Elios Vision”), who was the developer of the ELIOS® procedure, the first clinically validated, minimally invasive glaucoma surgery procedure using an excimer laser. The Company consummated the acquisition for: (i) a cash payment of approximately $99 million and (ii) potential future milestone obligations. This acquisition is expected to bolster the Company’s glaucoma treatment portfolio. The acquisition of Elios Vision has been accounted for as a business combination under the acquisition method of accounting. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed are included within the Company’s Surgical segment.

As of the acquisition date, the potential future milestone obligations, included as part of the aggregate purchase consideration, were recognized as a contingent consideration liability of $89 million, of which $11 million was recorded as a current liability. The Company reassesses its acquisition-related contingent consideration liabilities each quarter for changes in fair value. See Note 6, “FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS” for additional information regarding the fair value assessment of the acquisition-related contingent consideration liabilities. In addition, as of the acquisition date, the Company allocated the aggregate purchase consideration of $188 million based on estimated fair values, which included recording $177 million of identifiable intangible assets, $16 million of other net liabilities and $27 million of goodwill. See Note 4, “ACQUISITIONS AND LICENSING AGREEMENTS” in the Annual Report for additional information regarding the Elios Vision acquisition, including further detail regarding the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The valuation of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as part of the Elios Vision acquisition, has not yet been finalized as of September 30, 2025. The areas that could be subject to change primarily relate to income tax matters. The Company will finalize these amounts no later than one year from the acquisition date.

Acquisition of Trukera Medical

On July 19, 2024, the Company, through an affiliate, acquired TearLab Corporation, d/b/a Trukera Medical (“Trukera Medical”) from its private equity owner, AccelMed Partners, and other shareholders. Trukera Medical commercializes ScoutPro®, a point-of-care portable device for precisely measuring osmolarity, the salt content of a person’s tears. This acquisition expands the Company’s presence in the dry eye market. The acquisition of Trukera Medical has been accounted for as a business combination under the acquisition method of accounting. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed are included within the Company’s Surgical segment. As of the acquisition date, the Company allocated the aggregate purchase consideration of approximately $24 million based on estimated fair values, which included recording $16 million of identifiable intangible assets, $6 million of other net assets and $2 million of goodwill. See Note 4, “ACQUISITIONS AND LICENSING AGREEMENTS” in the Annual Report for additional information regarding the Trukera Medical acquisition, including further detail regarding the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

6. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair value measurements are estimated based on valuation techniques and inputs categorized as follows:

•Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

•Level 2 — Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and

•Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are financial instruments whose values are determined using discounted cash flow methodologies, pricing models, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation.

If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following fair value hierarchy table presents the components and classification of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments, primarily money market funds, with maturities of three months or less when purchased, and are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at carrying value, which approximates fair value due to their short-term nature.

There were no transfers into or out of Level 3 during the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024.

Cross-currency Swaps

The Company uses cross-currency swaps to mitigate fluctuation in the value of a portion of its euro-denominated net investment in its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements from fluctuation in exchange rates. The euro-denominated net investment being hedged is the Company’s investment in certain euro-denominated subsidiaries. As of September 30, 2025, these swaps had an aggregate notional value of $1,000 million.

The assets and liabilities associated with the Company’s cross-currency swaps as included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are as follows:

The following table presents the effect of hedging instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024:

No portion of the cross-currency swaps were ineffective for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024. The Company received $12 million and $13 million in interest settlements for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, which are reported as investing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts

The Company enters into foreign currency exchange contracts to economically hedge the foreign exchange exposure on certain of the Company’s intercompany balances. As of September 30, 2025, these contracts had an aggregate notional amount of $288 million.

The assets and liabilities associated with the Company’s foreign exchange contracts as included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 are as follows:

The following table presents the effect of the Company’s foreign exchange contracts on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024:

Acquisition-related Contingent Consideration Obligations

Acquisition-related contingent consideration, which primarily consists of potential milestone payments, is recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at its acquisition date estimated fair value, in accordance with the acquisition method of accounting. The fair value of the acquisition-related contingent consideration is remeasured each reporting period, with changes in fair value recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value measurement is based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in fair value measurement accounting.

The fair value measurement of contingent consideration obligations arising from business combinations is determined via a probability-weighted discounted cash flow analysis, using unobservable (Level 3) inputs. These inputs may include: (i) the estimated amount and timing of projected cash flows, (ii) the probability of the achievement of the factor(s) on which the contingency is based and (iii) the risk-adjusted discount rate used to present value the probability-weighted cash flows. Significant increases or decreases in any of those inputs in isolation could result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement. At September 30, 2025, the fair value measurements of acquisition-related contingent consideration were determined using risk-adjusted discount rates ranging from 10% to 16%, and a weighted average risk-adjusted discount rate of 10%. The weighted average risk-adjusted discount rate was calculated by weighting each contract’s relative fair value at September 30, 2025.

The following table presents a reconciliation of contingent consideration obligations measured on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024:

Fair Value of Long-term Debt

The fair value of long-term debt as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 was $5,078 million and $4,898 million, respectively, and was estimated using the quoted market prices for the same or similar debt issuances (Level 2).

7. INVENTORIES

Inventories, net consist of:

8. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL

Intangible Assets

The major components of intangible assets consist of:

Long-lived assets with finite lives are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment charges associated with these assets are included in Other expense, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Bausch + Lomb continues to monitor the recoverability of its finite-lived intangible assets and tests the intangible assets for impairment if indicators of impairment are present.

There wereno asset impairments during the nine months ended September 30, 2025. Asset impairments during the nine months ended September 30, 2024 were $5 million related to a product brand discontinuation.

Estimated amortization expense of finite-lived intangible assets for the remainder of 2025 and the five succeeding years ending December 31 and thereafter are as follows:

Goodwill

The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill during the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and the year ended December 31, 2024 were as follows:

Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment at least annually as of October 1 st at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is the same as, or one level below, an operating segment. Bausch + Lomb performs its annual impairment test by first assessing qualitative factors. Where the qualitative assessment suggests that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, a quantitative fair value test is performed for that reporting unit (Step 1).

2024 Annual Goodwill Impairment Test

The Company conducted its annual goodwill impairment test as of October 1, 2024, by first assessing qualitative factors. Based on its qualitative assessment as of October 1, 2024, management believed that it was more likely than not that the carrying amounts of each of its reporting units were less than their respective fair values and therefore concluded that a quantitative fair value test was not required.

June 30, 2025 Interim Assessment

During the period from October 1, 2024 (the last time goodwill was tested for all reporting units) through June 30, 2025, the Company identified a decline in its market capitalization. This decline was primarily in response to the overall volatility within the global equity markets. However, at June 30, 2025, after considering the length and lack of recovery from this market capitalization decline, in comparison to the performance of the overall equity markets, the Company believed that the fair value of its reporting units could be less than their carrying amounts, and, therefore, a quantitative fair value test was performed.

The quantitative fair value tests utilized the Company’s most recent cash flow projections for each of its reporting units which reflected current market conditions and current trends in business performance. The quantitative assessment utilized long-term growth rates of 3.0% and discount rates ranging from 10.00% to 11.50%, in estimation of the fair value of the reporting units. After completing the testing, the fair value of each of the Company’s reporting units exceeded its carrying value by more than 25%, and, therefore, there wasno impairment to goodwill.

September 30, 2025 Interim Assessment

No events occurred or circumstances changed during the period from June 30, 2025 (the last time goodwill was tested for all reporting units) through September 30, 2025 that would indicate that the fair value of any reporting unit might be below its carrying value.

If market conditions deteriorate, or if the Company is unable to execute its strategies, it may be necessary to record impairment charges in the future.

There wereno goodwill impairment charges through September 30, 2025.

9. ACCRUED AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

Accrued and other current liabilities consist of:

Under the terms of a December 2019 license agreement with Novaliq GmbH, the Company is required to make future sales-based payments for MIEBO®, and, in anticipation of achieving an annual sales-based milestone, the Company accrued the $35 million milestone payment as of September 30, 2025, which is included within Other, in the table above.

10. FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

Principal amounts of debt obligations and principal amounts of debt obligations net of issuance costs consist of the following:

Senior Secured Credit Facilities

On May 10, 2022, Bausch + Lomb entered into a credit agreement (the “Original Credit Agreement”), providing for a term loan of $2,500 million with afive-year term to maturity (the “May 2027 Term Facility”) and afive-year revolving credit facility of $500 million (the “May 2027 Revolving Credit Facility”).

On September 29, 2023, Bausch + Lomb entered into an incremental term loan facility secured on a pari passu basis with the Company’s existing May 2027 Term Facility. This incremental term loan facility was entered into in the form of an incremental amendment (the “September 2023 Credit Facility Amendment”) to our credit agreement and consisted of borrowings of $500 million in new term B loans with afive-year term to maturity (the “September 2028 Term Facility”).

On November 1, 2024, Bausch + Lomb entered into an additional incremental term loan facility secured on a pari passu basis with the Company’s existing May 2027 Term Facility and September 2028 Term Facility. This incremental term loan facility was entered into in the form of an incremental amendment (the “November 2024 Credit Facility Amendment”) to our credit agreement and consisted of borrowing $400 million of new term loans with a maturity of May 2027.

June 2025 Refinancing Activity

On June 26, 2025, the Company entered into a third amendment to our credit agreement (the “June 2025 Credit Facility Amendment”; the Original Credit Agreement, as amended by the September 2023 Credit Facility Amendment, the November 2024 Credit Facility Amendment and the June 2025 Credit Facility Amendment, the “Amended Credit Agreement”), whereby the Company entered into a new $800 million revolving credit facility maturing June 26, 2030 (subject to customary “springing” maturity provisions) (the “June 2030 Revolving Credit Facility”) and a new $2,325 million term B loan facility maturing January 15, 2031 (the “January 2031 Term Facility” and, together with the September 2028 Term Facility, the “Term Facilities”; the Term Facilities, together with the June 2030 Revolving Credit Facility, the “Senior Secured Credit Facilities”). The net proceeds from the January 2031 Secured Notes offering (as defined and described below) and the January 2031 Term Facility were used by the Company to: (i) repay in full borrowings under the May 2027 Revolving Credit Facility, (ii) refinance, in full, its outstanding term loans due 2027 and (iii) pay related fees and expenses.

The Senior Secured Credit Facilities are secured by substantially all of the assets of Bausch + Lomb and its material, wholly-owned Canadian, U.S., Dutch and Irish subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions. The Term Facilities are denominated in U.S. dollars, and borrowings under the June 2030 Revolving Credit Facility may be made available in U.S. dollars, euros, pounds sterling and Canadian dollars. As of September 30, 2025, the principal amounts outstanding under the September 2028 Term Facility and the January 2031 Term Facility were $490 million and $2,319 million, respectively. As of

September 30, 2025, the Company hadno outstanding borrowings, $38 million of issued and outstanding letters of credit and remaining availability, subject to certain customary conditions, of $762 million under its June 2030 Revolving Credit Facility.

Borrowings under the June 2030 Revolving Credit Facility in: (i) U.S. dollars bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at Bausch + Lomb’s option, either: (a) a term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”)-based rate or (b) a U.S. dollar base rate, (ii) Canadian dollars bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at Bausch + Lomb’s option, either: (a) a term Canadian Overnight Repo Rate Average (“CORRA”)-based rate or (b) a Canadian dollar prime rate, (iii) euros bear interest at a rate per annum equal to EURIBOR and (iv) pounds sterling bear interest at a rate per annum equal to Sterling Overnight Index Average (“SONIA”) (provided, however, that the term SOFR-based rate, term CORRA-based rate, EURIBOR and SONIA shall be no less than 0.00% per annum at any time and the U.S. dollar base rate and the Canadian dollar prime rate shall be no less than 1.00% per annum at any time), in each case, plus an applicable margin. Term SOFR-based borrowings under the June 2030 Revolving Credit Facility are not subject to any credit spread adjustment.

The applicable interest rate margins for borrowings under the June 2030 Revolving Credit Facility are between 0.75% to 1.75% with respect to U.S. dollar base rate or Canadian dollar prime rate borrowings and between 1.75% to 2.75% with respect to SOFR, CORRA, EURIBOR or SONIA borrowings based on Bausch + Lomb’s total net leverage ratio. In addition, Bausch + Lomb is required to pay commitment fees of 0.25% per annum in respect of the unutilized commitments under the June 2030 Revolving Credit Facility, payable quarterly in arrears. Bausch + Lomb is also required to pay letter of credit fees on the maximum amount available to be drawn under all outstanding letters of credit in an amount equal to the applicable margin on SOFR borrowings under the June 2030 Revolving Credit Facility on a per annum basis, payable quarterly in arrears, as well as customary fronting fees for the issuance of letters of credit and agency fees.

Borrowings under the September 2028 Term Facility bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, either: (i) a term SOFR-based rate, plus an applicable margin of 4.00%, or (ii) a U.S. dollar base rate, plus an applicable margin of 3.00% (provided, however, that the term SOFR-based rate shall be no less than 0.00% per annum at any time and the U.S. dollar base rate shall not be lower than 1.00% per annum at any time). Term SOFR-based borrowings under the September 2028 Term Facility are not subject to any credit spread adjustment. The stated rate of interest under the September 2028 Term Facility at September 30, 2025 was 8.16% per annum.

Borrowings under the January 2031 Term Facility bear interest at a rate per annum equal to, at our option, either: (i) a term SOFR-based rate, plus an applicable margin of 4.25%, or (ii) a U.S. dollar base rate, plus an applicable margin of 3.25% (provided, however, that the term SOFR-based rate shall be no less than 0.00% per annum at any time and the U.S. dollar base rate shall not be lower than 1.00% per annum at any time). Term SOFR-based borrowings under the January 2031 Term Facility are not subject to any credit spread adjustment. The stated rate of interest under the January 2031 Term Facility at September 30, 2025 was 8.41% per annum.

Subject to certain exceptions and customary baskets set forth in the Amended Credit Agreement, Bausch + Lomb is required to make mandatory prepayments of the loans under Term Facilities under certain circumstances, including from: (i)100% of the net cash proceeds of insurance and condemnation proceeds for property or asset losses (subject to reinvestment rights, decrease based on leverage ratios and net proceeds threshold), (ii)100% of the net cash proceeds from the incurrence of debt (other than permitted debt as described in the Amended Credit Agreement), (iii)50% of Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) subject to decrease based on leverage ratios and subject to a threshold amount and (iv)100% of net cash proceeds from asset sales (subject to reinvestment rights, decrease based on leverage ratios and net proceeds threshold). These mandatory prepayments may be used to satisfy future amortization.

The amortization rate for the September 2028 Term Facility is 1.00% per annum, or $5 million, payable in quarterly installments. Bausch + Lomb may direct that prepayments be applied to such amortization payments in order of maturity. As of September 30, 2025, the remaining mandatory quarterly amortization payments for the September 2028 Term Facility were $14 million through June 2028, with the remaining term loan balance being due in September 2028.

The amortization rate for the January 2031 Term Facility is 1.00% per annum, or $23 million, payable in quarterly installments, with the first installment to be paid on September 30, 2025. Bausch + Lomb may direct that prepayments be applied to such amortization payments in order of maturity. As of September 30, 2025, the remaining mandatory quarterly amortization payments for the January 2031 Term Facility were $122 million through December 2030, with the remaining term loan balance being due in January 2031.

See Note 10, “FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS” in the Annual Report for additional information regarding the Company’s Senior Secured Credit Facilities.

Senior Secured Notes

On September 29, 2023, Bausch + Lomb issued $1,400 million aggregate principal amount of 8.375% Senior Secured Notes due October 2028 (the “October 2028 Secured Notes”).

On June 26, 2025, Bausch + Lomb’s subsidiaries, Bausch + Lomb Netherlands B.V. and Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (the “Issuers”), issued €675 million aggregate principal amount of Senior Secured Floating Rate Notes due January 2031 (the “January 2031 Secured Notes” and, together with the October 2028 Secured Notes, the “Senior Secured Notes”). The proceeds from the January 2031 Secured Notes, along with the proceeds of the January 2031 Term Facility, were used by the Company to: (i) repay in full outstanding borrowings under the May 2027 Revolving Credit Facility, (ii) refinance, in full, its outstanding term loans due 2027 and (iii) pay related fees and expenses. The January 2031 Secured Notes accrue interest at a rate per annum of: (i) three-month EURIBOR (subject to a 0% floor) plus (ii)3.875%, reset quarterly, payable quarterly in arrears on January 15, April 15, July 15 and October 15 of each year, commencing on January 15, 2026. At September 30, 2025, the January 2031 Secured Notes bore interest at 5.87% per annum.

The January 2031 Secured Notes are guaranteed by the Company and each of the Company’s subsidiaries (other than the Issuers) that is a guarantor under the Amended Credit Agreement (collectively, the “Note Guarantors”). The January 2031 Secured Notes and the guarantees related thereto are senior obligations and are secured, subject to permitted liens and certain other exceptions, by the same first priority liens that secure the borrowings under the Amended Credit Agreement and the obligations under the October 2028 Secured Notes.

The January 2031 Secured Notes and the guarantees related thereto rank pari passu in right of payment with all of the Issuers’ and Note Guarantors’ respective existing and future unsubordinated indebtedness and senior to the Issuers’ and Note Guarantors’ respective existing and future indebtedness that expressly provides for its subordination to the January 2031 Secured Notes and the applicable guarantees. The January 2031 Secured Notes and the guarantees related thereto are effectively pari passu with the Issuers’ and the Note Guarantors’ respective existing and future indebtedness secured by a first priority lien on the collateral securing the obligations under the Amended Credit Agreement, the October 2028 Secured Notes and the January 2031 Secured Notes and effectively senior to the Issuers’ and the Note Guarantors’ respective existing and future indebtedness that is unsecured, or that is secured by junior liens, in each case to the extent of the value of the collateral. In addition, the January 2031 Secured Notes are: (i) structurally subordinated to all liabilities of any of the Company’s subsidiaries (other than the Issuers) that do not guarantee the January 2031 Secured Notes to the extent of the value of such subsidiaries’ assets and (ii) effectively subordinated to any of the Issuers’ and Note Guarantors’ debt that is secured by assets that are not collateral to the extent of the value of such assets.

Upon the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the indenture governing the January 2031 Secured Notes), unless the Issuers have exercised their right to redeem all of the January 2031 Secured Notes, holders of the January 2031 Secured Notes may require the Issuers to repurchase such holders’ January 2031 Secured Notes, in whole or in part, at a purchase price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, but not including, the date of purchase.

The January 2031 Secured Notes are redeemable at the option of the Issuers, in whole or in part, at any time on or after June 30, 2026, at a redemption price of 100.000% of the principal amount thereof, redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the date of redemption. Prior to June 30, 2026, the Issuers may redeem the January 2031 Secured Notes in whole or in part at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of the January 2031 Secured Notes redeemed plus a make-whole premium. Prior to June 30, 2026, the Issuers may on any one or more occasions redeem up to 40% of the aggregate principal amount of the January 2031 Secured Notes at a redemption price of 103.875% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the date of redemption with the net cash proceeds of one or more equity offerings, subject to certain conditions.

See Note 10, “FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS” in the Annual Report for additional information regarding the Company’s Senior Secured Notes.

Weighted Average Stated Rate of Interest

The weighted average stated rate of interest for the Company’s outstanding debt obligations as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 was 7.97% and 7.95%, respectively.

In connection with the repayment of the May 2027 Term Facility, May 2027 Incremental Term Facility and May 2027 Revolving Credit Facility (as described above), the Company incurred a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately $6 million, representing the difference between the amount paid to settle the extinguished debt and the extinguished debt’s carrying value. The loss on extinguishment of debt of $6 million, includes a $3 million true-up recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2025.

Maturities and Mandatory Payments

Maturities and mandatory payments of debt obligations for the remainder of 2025, five succeeding years ending December 31 and thereafter are as follows:

Covenant Compliance

The Senior Secured Credit Facilities contain customary affirmative and negative covenants and specified events of default. These affirmative and negative covenants include, among other things, and subject to certain qualifications and exceptions, covenants that restrict Bausch + Lomb’s ability and the ability of its subsidiaries to: incur or guarantee additional indebtedness; create or permit liens on assets; pay dividends on capital stock or redeem, repurchase or retire capital stock or subordinated indebtedness; make certain investments and other restricted payments; engage in mergers, acquisitions, consolidations and amalgamations; transfer and sell certain assets; and engage in transactions with affiliates. The June 2030 Revolving Credit Facility also contains a financial covenant that requires the Company to, if, as of the last day of any fiscal quarter of the Company (commencing with the second full fiscal quarter ending after the closing the June 2025 Credit Facility Amendment), loans and swingline loans are outstanding thereunder in an aggregate amount greater than 35% of the total commitments thereunder at such time, maintain a maximum first lien net leverage ratio of not greater than (a) commencing with the second full fiscal quarter ending after the closing of the June 2025 Credit Facility Amendment through and including the eighth full fiscal quarter,5.75:1.00, (b) commencing with the ninth full fiscal quarter after the closing of the June 2025 Credit Facility Amendment through and including the twelfth full fiscal quarter,5.50:1.00, (c) commencing with the thirteenth full fiscal quarter after the closing of the June 2025 Credit Facility Amendment through and including the sixteenth full fiscal quarter,5.25:1.00, and (d) thereafter,5.00:1.00. The financial covenant applicable to the June 2030 Revolving Credit Facility may be waived or amended with the consent of a majority of the lenders under the June 2030 Revolving Credit Facility, and without the consent of the lenders under any other Senior Secured Credit Facility or any other person and contain a customary term loan facility standstill and customary cure rights. The indentures governing the Senior Secured Notes also contain negative covenants and events of default that are similar to those contained in the Senior Secured Credit Facilities.

As of September 30, 2025, the Company was in compliance with its financial covenants related to its debt obligations. Bausch + Lomb, based on its current forecast for the next twelve months from the date of issuance of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, expects to remain in compliance with its financial covenants and meet its debt service obligations over that same period.

11. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

Bausch + Lomb Corporation 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan

Effective May 5, 2022, Bausch + Lomb established the Bausch + Lomb Corporation 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and a total of 28,000,000 common shares of Bausch + Lomb were originally authorized for issuance under the Plan. The Plan was amended and restated effective April 24, 2023 and further amended and restated on May 29, 2024, to increase the number of shares authorized for issuance (the “Amended and Restated Plan”), resulting in an aggregate 52,000,000 common shares of Bausch + Lomb authorized for issuance under the Amended and Restated Plan.

The Amended and Restated Plan provides for the grant of various types of awards, including restricted stock units (“RSUs”), restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, stock options, performance-based awards and cash awards. Under the Amended and Restated Plan, the exercise price of awards, if any, is set on the grant date and may not be less than the fair market value per share on that date. Generally, stock options have a term often years and athree-year vesting period, subject to limited exceptions.

Share-based awards granted to senior management align with the Company’s focus on enhancing its revenue growth while maintaining focus on total shareholder return over the long term. The share-based awards granted under this long-term incentive program consist of time-based stock options, time-based RSUs and performance-based RSUs (“PSUs”). The PSUs are comprised of awards that vest upon: (i) achievement of certain share price appreciation conditions, including absolute and relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) (the “TSR PSUs”), (ii) attainment of certain performance targets that are based on the Company’s Organic Revenue Growth (the “Organic Revenue Growth PSUs”) and (iii) outperformance of performance goals, based on the level of achievement of: (a) a revenue metric (measured for fiscal year 2026) and (b) relative TSR metric (if applicable) (“OPG PSU”). If the Company’s performance is below a specified performance level, no common shares will be paid. Each vested PSU represents the right of a holder to receive a number of the Company’s common shares up to a specified maximum.

Approximately 13,700,000 common shares were available for future grants as of September 30, 2025. Bausch + Lomb uses reserved and unissued common shares to satisfy its obligations under its share-based compensation plans.

In July 2025, the Talent and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved certain amendments to the employment agreement by and between Brent Saunders, Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chair of the Board of Directors of the Company, and Bausch + Lomb, dated as of February 14, 2023, and the award agreement underlying certain performance stock units previously granted to Mr. Saunders in connection with his appointment as CEO (the “New Hire PSUs”). The amendments to the New Hire PSUs provided that the New Hire PSUs will now vest and payout between 120% -330% of the target award on February 23, 2029 (the “New Performance End Date”), based on the level of achievement of (x) specified share-price hurdle goals ranging from $26.57 per share to $39.06 per share measured as of the New Performance End Date and (y) a new cumulative Adjusted EBITDA performance modifier goal for the Company’s 2025 - 2028 fiscal years measured against specified cumulative targets (which modifies the payout between a range of -40% to+40% of the payout level under the share-price hurdle performance goal, subject to Mr. Saunders’ continued employment through the New Performance End Date (subject to certain exceptions). The Company began accounting for these modifications during the quarter ended September 30, 2025. These modifications did not have a material impact on the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025.

The components and classification of share-based compensation expense related to stock options, PSUs and RSUs directly attributable to those employees specifically identified as Bausch + Lomb employees for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 were as follows:

Share-based awards granted for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 consist of:

As of September 30, 2025, the remaining unrecognized compensation expenses related to all outstanding non-vested stock options, time-based RSUs and PSUs amounted to $137 million, which will be amortized over a weighted-average period of 1.78 years.

12. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

Accumulated other comprehensive loss consists of:

Income taxes are not provided for foreign currency translation adjustments arising on the translation of Bausch + Lomb’s operations having a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar, except to the extent of translation adjustments related to Bausch + Lomb’s retained earnings for foreign jurisdictions in which Bausch + Lomb is not considered to be permanently reinvested.

13. OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE, NET

Other (income) expense, net for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 consists of:

The Company evaluates opportunities to improve its operating results and implements cost savings programs to streamline its operations and eliminate redundant processes and expenses. Restructuring and integration costs include expenses associated with the implementation of these cost savings programs and include expenses associated with reducing headcount and other cost reduction initiatives. Restructuring, integration and separation costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 were $43 million and $20 million, respectively, and primarily consist of employee severance costs. These severance costs were provided under an ongoing benefit arrangement and were therefore recorded once they were both probable and reasonably estimable in accordance with the provisions of ASC 712-10, “Nonretirement Postemployment Benefits”.

Acquired in-process research and development costs in 2025 primarily relates to the acquisition of Whitecap Biosciences, as discussed in Note 5, “ACQUISITIONS”.

Acquisition-related contingent consideration in 2025 primarily reflects changes in: (i) the timing of regulatory approval of certain pipeline products and (ii) the estimated amount and timing of projected cash flows of certain products.

14. INCOME TAXES

For interim financial statement purposes, U.S. GAAP income tax expense/benefit related to ordinary income is determined by applying an estimated annual effective income tax rate against a company’s ordinary income, subject to certain limitations on the benefit of losses. Income tax expense/benefit related to items not characterized as ordinary income is recognized as a discrete item when incurred. The estimation of Bausch + Lomb’s income tax provision requires the use of management forecasts and other estimates, application of statutory income tax rates and an evaluation of valuation allowances. The Company’s estimated annual effective income tax rate may be revised, if necessary, in each interim period.

Benefit from income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 was $36 million. The difference between the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to jurisdictional mix of earnings and the discrete tax effects of: (a) a benefit for previously accrued taxes that settled favorably with the Internal Revenue Service (b) the impact of the voluntary recall of certain enVista IOL products, (c) the filing of certain tax returns and (d) a change in the deduction for stock compensation. Provision for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 was $79 million. The difference between the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to jurisdictional mix of earnings and the discrete tax effects of: (a) the filing of certain tax returns, (b) a change in the deduction for stock compensation and (c) the release of uncertain tax positions where the statute of limitations in certain jurisdictions lapsed.

The Company records a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets to reduce the net carrying value to an amount that it believes is more likely than not to be realized. When the Company establishes or reduces the valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets, the provision for income taxes will increase or decrease, respectively, in the period such determination is made. The valuation allowance against deferred tax assets was $201 million and $179 million as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. The increase is related to the losses incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2025 in jurisdictions for which the Company has established a full valuation allowance offset partially by movement in deferred taxes due to realized gain on loan settlements.

The Company’s U.S. affiliates remain under examination for various state tax audits in the U.S. for years 2017 through 2023.

The Company’s subsidiaries in Germany are under audit for tax years 2017 through 2019. During the three months ended September 30, 2023, the Company received a preliminary assessment from the German taxing authority for the 2014 through 2016 period that would disallow certain transfer pricing adjustments. The Company contested this alleged tax deficiency through the appropriate appeals process and reached a preliminary settlement with the German taxing authority during the year ended December 31, 2024. The settlement was then finalized with the taxing authority and resulted in an immaterial tax cost that closed the 2014 to 2016 audit period. The Company continues to believe this liability will be indemnified by BHC pursuant to the Tax Matters Agreement.

As of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company had $72 million and $64 million of unrecognized tax benefits, which included $11 million and $9 million of interest and penalties, respectively. Of the total unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2025, $58 million would reduce the Company’s effective tax rate, if recognized.

15.(LOSS) EARNINGS PER SHARE

(Loss) earnings per share attributable to Bausch + Lomb Corporation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 were calculated as follows:

During thethree and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and the nine months ended September 30, 2024, all potential common shares issuable for RSUs, PSUs and stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share, as the effect of including them would have been anti-dilutive. The dilutive effect of potential common shares issuable for RSUs, PSUs and stock options on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding would have been approximately 3,184,000 and 2,700,000 common shares for thethree and nine months ended September 30, 2025, respectively. The dilutive effect of potential common shares issuable for RSUs, PSUs and stock options on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding would have been approximately 1,592,000 common shares for thenine months ended September 30, 2024.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, RSUs, PSUs and stock options to purchase approximately 11,328,000 and 13,698,000 common shares, respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, an additional 2,494,000 PSUs were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as they are either linked to the completion of the Separation or the required performance conditions had not yet been met.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2024, RSUs, PSUs and stock options to purchase approximately 10,815,000 common shares were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, an additional 2,865,000 PSUs were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as they are either linked to the completion of the Separation or the required performance conditions had not yet been met.

16. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Bausch + Lomb is involved, and, from time to time, may become involved, in various legal and administrative proceedings, which include or may include product liability, intellectual property, commercial, tax, antitrust, governmental and regulatory investigations, related private litigation and ordinary course employment-related issues. From time to time, Bausch + Lomb also initiates or may initiate actions or file counterclaims. Bausch + Lomb could be subject to counterclaims or other suits in response to actions it may initiate. Bausch + Lomb believes that the prosecution of these actions and counterclaims is important to preserve and protect Bausch + Lomb, its reputation and its assets.

On a quarterly basis, Bausch + Lomb evaluates developments in legal proceedings, potential settlements and other matters that could increase or decrease the amount of the liability accrued. As of September 30, 2025, Bausch + Lomb’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets includes accrued current loss contingencies of $10 million related to matters which are both probable and reasonably estimable. For all other matters, unless otherwise indicated, Bausch + Lomb cannot reasonably predict the outcome of these legal proceedings, nor can it estimate the amount of loss, or range of loss, if any, that may result from these proceedings. An adverse outcome in certain of these proceedings could have a material adverse effect on Bausch + Lomb’s business, financial condition and results of operations, and could cause the market price or value of its common shares and/or debt securities to decline.

Antitrust

Generic Pricing Antitrust Litigation

BHC and its subsidiaries, Oceanside Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bausch Health US, LLC (formerly Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America LLC) (“Bausch Health US”), and Bausch Health Americas, Inc. (formerly Valeant Pharmaceuticals International) (“Bausch Health Americas”) (for the purposes of this paragraph, collectively, the “Company”), are defendants in multidistrict antitrust litigation (“MDL”) entitled In re: Generic Pharmaceuticals Pricing Antitrust Litigation, pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (MDL 2724, 16 MD-2724). Bausch + Lomb Corporation had been named as a defendant in the MDL inone complaint, but this complaint has been amended to remove Bausch + Lomb Corporation and, as a result, Bausch + Lomb Corporation isno longer a party to the MDL. The lawsuits seek damages under federal and state antitrust laws, state consumer protection and unjust enrichment laws and allege that the Company’s subsidiaries entered into a conspiracy to fix, stabilize, and raise prices, rig bids and engage in market and customer allocation for generic pharmaceuticals. The lawsuits, which are brought as putative class actions by direct purchasers, end payers, and indirect resellers, and as direct actions by direct purchasers, end payers, insurers, hospitals, pharmacies, and various Counties, Cities, and Towns, are consolidated into the MDL. There are also additional, separate complaints which are consolidated in the same MDL that do not name the Company or any of its subsidiaries as a defendant. State of Connecticut, et al. v. Sandoz, Inc., et al., (D. CT, C.A. No. 3:20-00802), in which Bausch Health US and Bausch Health Americas are defendants has been remanded to and is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut. There are cases pending in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County and New York State Supreme Court against the Company and other defendants related to the multidistrict litigation. The Company disputes the claims against it and these cases will be defended vigorously.

Additionally, BHC and certain U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries (for the purposes of this paragraph, collectively the “Company”) have been named as defendants in a proposed class proceeding entitled Kathryn Eaton v. Teva Canada Limited, et al. in the Federal Court in Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Court File No. T-607-20). The plaintiff seeks to certify a proposed class action on behalf of persons in Canada who purchased generic drugs in the private sector, alleging that the Company and other defendants violated the Competition Act by conspiring to allocate the market, fix prices, and maintain the supply of generic drugs, and seeking damages under federal law. The proposed class action contains similar allegations to the In re: Generic Pharmaceuticals Pricing Antitrust Litigation pending in the U.S. Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The Company disputes the claims against it and this case will be defended vigorously.

These lawsuits cover products of both Bausch + Lomb and BHC’s other businesses. It is anticipated that Bausch + Lomb and BHC will split the fees and expenses associated with defending these claims, as well as any potential damages or other liabilities awarded in or otherwise arising from these claims, in the manner set forth in the MSA.

Product Liability

Shower to Shower® Products Liability Litigation

Since 2016, BHC and its affiliates, including Bausch + Lomb, have been named in a number of product liability lawsuits involving the Shower to Shower® body powder product acquired in September 2012 from Johnson & Johnson; due to dismissals, twenty-three (23) of such product liability suits currently remain pending. In three (3) cases pending in the Atlantic County, New Jersey Multi-County Litigation, agreed stipulations of dismissal have been entered by the Court, thus dismissing the Company from those cases. One (1) case was also recently dismissed with prejudice in its entirety for failure of plaintiff to comply with court orders requiring plaintiff fact sheets. Two cases in the federal Multidistrict Litigation were dismissed recently for failure to comply with orders requiring Plaintiff Profile Forms. Potential liability (including its attorneys’ fees and costs) arising out of these remaining suits is subject to full indemnification obligations of Johnson & Johnson owed to BHC and its affiliates, including Bausch + Lomb, and legal fees and costs will be paid by Johnson & Johnson. Twenty-two (22) of these lawsuits filed by individual plaintiffs allege that the use of Shower to Shower® caused the plaintiffs to develop ovarian cancer, mesothelioma or breast cancer. The allegations in these cases include failure to warn, design defect, manufacturing defect, negligence, gross negligence, breach of express and implied warranties, civil conspiracy concert in action, negligent misrepresentation, wrongful death, loss of consortium and/or punitive damages. The damages sought include compensatory damages, including medical expenses, lost wages or earning capacity, loss of consortium and/or compensation for pain and suffering, mental anguish anxiety and discomfort, physical impairment and loss of enjoyment of life. Plaintiffs also seek pre- and post-judgment interest, exemplary and punitive damages, and attorneys’ fees. Additionally, two proposed class actions were filed in Canada against BHC and various Johnson & Johnson entities (one in the Supreme Court of British Columbia andone in the Superior Court of Quebec), on behalf of persons who have purchased or used Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder or Shower to Shower®. The class actions allege the use of the product increases certain health risks (British Columbia) or negligence in failing to properly test, failing to warn of health risks, and failing to remove the products from the market in a timely manner (Quebec). The plaintiffs in these actions are seeking awards of general, special, compensatory and punitive damages. On November 17, 2020, the British Columbia court issued a judgment declining to certify a class as to BHC or Shower to Shower®, and at this time no appeal of that judgment has been filed. On December 16, 2021, the plaintiff in the British Columbia class action filed a Second Amended Notice of Civil Claim and Application for Certification, removing BHC as a defendant; as a result, the British Columbia class action is concluded as to BHC.

In October 2021, Johnson & Johnson, through one or more subsidiaries purported to complete a Texas divisional merger with respect to any talc liabilities at Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. (“JJCI”). LTL Management, LLC (“LTL”), the resulting entity of the divisional merger, assumed JJCI’s talc liabilities and thereafter filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of North Carolina, which in November 2021 was transferred to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey (the “New Jersey Bankruptcy Court”). The first bankruptcy case was dismissed on April 4, 2023, after a decision by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, and LTL re-filed a new Chapter 11 case on the same day. Several motions to dismiss were again filed, and on August 11, 2023, the second Chapter 11 case was dismissed. LTL and certain supporting creditors and tort claimants appealed, and on July 25, 2024, the Third Circuit affirmed the dismissal order, and LTL’s second bankruptcy case was closed. During the pendency of LTL’s bankruptcy cases, the New Jersey Bankruptcy Court extended a preliminary injunction that had stayed substantially all cases subject to the indemnification agreement related to Johnson & Johnson’s talc liability, which injunction was terminated in connection with the bankruptcy case dismissal.

In December 2023, LTL changed its name to LLT Management LLC (“LLT”). In June and July 2024, LLT solicited votes for a new “pre-packaged” Chapter 11 plan, and after the reported successful solicitation of votes to commence the planned bankruptcy, LLT and certain affiliates underwent another corporate restructuring that resulted intwo entities, Red River Talc LLC (“Red River”) and Pecos River Talc LLC (“Pecos River”), assuming the talc liabilities of LLT. On September 20, 2024, Red River filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (the “Texas Bankruptcy Court”), seeking to resolve all ovarian cancer-related talc claims. On October 21, 2024, the Texas Bankruptcy Court agreed to enter a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction staying all ovarian cancer-related talc claims at least through December 2024, which it has since extended through March 15, 2025. On December 9, 2024, Red River filed a Second Amended Chapter 11 plan incorporating the settlement with the Talc Claimants’ Committee. A hearing on confirmation of the plan and any objections thereto began on February 18, 2025. Johnson & Johnson has reported that the entity Pecos River will be responsible for resolving all non-ovarian cancer-related talc claims outside of bankruptcy. After the conclusion of the confirmation hearing, on March 31, 2025, the Texas Bankruptcy Court issued a memorandum decision denying confirmation of the plan, ordering the dismissal of Red River’s bankruptcy case and vacating the preliminary injunction. The debtor’s time to appeal has expired. Certain claimants filed motions to reconsider the dismissal of the bankruptcy case. Those motions were denied and the time to appeal has expired.

Red River, Pecos River and Johnson & Johnson continue to have indemnification obligations running to BHC and its affiliates, including Bausch + Lomb, for Shower to Shower® related product liability litigation. It is our expectation that Johnson & Johnson, in accordance with the applicable indemnification agreement, will continue to vigorously defend BHC and Bausch + Lomb in each of the remaining actions, and that BHC and Bausch + Lomb will not incur any material losses with respect to indemnification claims as a result of the divisional merger or the bankruptcy.

General Civil Actions

U.S. Securities Litigation– New Jersey Declaratory Judgment Lawsuit

On March 24, 2022, BHC and Bausch + Lomb were named in a declaratory judgment action in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Somerset County, Chancery Division, brought by certain individual investors in BHC’s common shares and debt securities who are also maintaining individual securities fraud claims against BHC and certain current or former officers and directors as part of the U.S. Securities Litigation. This action seeks a declaratory judgment that alleged transfers of certain BHC assets to Bausch + Lomb would constitute a voidable transfer under the New Jersey Voidable Transactions Act and that Bausch + Lomb would be liable for damages, if any, awarded against BHC in the individual opt-out actions. The declaratory judgment action also alleges that the potential future separation of Bausch + Lomb from BHC by distribution of Bausch + Lomb stock to BHC’s shareholders would leave BHC with inadequate financial resources to satisfy these plaintiffs’ alleged securities fraud damages in the underlying individual opt-out actions. None of the plaintiffs in this declaratory judgment action have obtained a judgment against BHC in the underlying individual opt-out actions and BHC disputes the claims against it in those underlying actions. The underlying individual opt-out actions assert claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a)

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), and certain actions assert claims under Section 18 of the Exchange Act. The allegations in those underlying individual opt-out actions are made against BHC and several of its former officers and directors only and relate to, among other things, allegedly false and misleading statements made during the 2013-2016 time period by BHC and/or failures to disclose information about BHC’s business and prospects, including relating to drug pricing and the use of specialty pharmacies. On March 31, 2022, BHC and Bausch + Lomb removed the declaratory judgment action to the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. On April 29, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a motion to remand. On November 29, 2022, the District Court granted Plaintiffs’ remand motion and the case was remanded to the New Jersey Superior Court Chancery Division. On December 8, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a proposed Order to Show Cause and motion for a preliminary injunction and sought interim relief including expedited discovery. On December 13, 2022, the Court denied Plaintiffs’ proposed Order to Show Cause and stayed discovery pending the resolution of BHC’s and Bausch + Lomb’s forthcoming motions to dismiss, while instructing BHC to provide certain notice to Plaintiffs of the intended completion of a potential future distribution referenced above under certain circumstances. On December 22, 2022, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint which, among other things, added claims seeking injunctive relief. On January 11, 2023, BHC and Bausch + Lomb moved to dismiss the amended complaint. Briefing was complete on February 24, 2023, and the motion to dismiss was heard on March 3, 2023. On April 3, 2023, the Court issued a decision granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss. In early August 2025, a settlement was reached and, on August 29, 2025, the Court issued an order staying this action pending satisfaction of certain conditions to that settlement. The case is expected to be dismissed with prejudice in January 2026.

Both BHC and Bausch + Lomb dispute the claims in this declaratory judgment action and intend to vigorously defend this matter.

Doctors Allergy Formula Lawsuit

In April 2018, Doctors Allergy Formula, LLC (“Doctors Allergy”), filed a lawsuit against Bausch Health Americas in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, asserting breach of contract and related claims under a 2015 Asset Purchase Agreement, which purports to include milestone payments that Doctors Allergy alleges should have been paid by Bausch Health Americas. Doctors Allergy claims its damages are not less than $23 million. Bausch Health Americas has asserted counterclaims against Doctors Allergy. Bausch Health Americas filed a motion seeking an order granting Bausch Health Americas’ motion for summary judgment on its counterclaims against Doctors Allergy and dismissing Doctors Allergy’s claims against Bausch Health Americas. The motion was fully briefed as of May 2021.The Court held a hearing on the motion on January 25, 2022. On May 12, 2023, the Court issued a Decision and Order denying the motion. On June 14, 2023, Bausch Health Americas filed a Notice of Appeal as to the Decision and Order. On March 13, 2024, Bausch Health Americas filed its appellate brief with the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court, First Department, appealing the trial court’s denial of Bausch Health America’s motion for summary judgment. Doctors Allergy filed its answering brief on July 26, 2024, and Bausch Health Americas filed its reply brief on September 13, 2024. The Appellate Division heard oral argument on November 7, 2024. On December 5, 2024, the Appellate Division denied Bausch Health Americas’ appeal as to Doctors Allergy’s second cause of action (breach of contract) and Bausch Health Americas’ counterclaims, but it granted the appeal as to Doctors Allergy’s third cause of action (breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing) and dismissed that claim. On December 13, 2024, the Appellate Division remitted this action back to the trial court. Trial has been set, with jury selection beginning on April 20, 2026, and trial scheduled for April 24 to May 8, 2026. Bausch Health Americas disputes the claims against it and this lawsuit will be defended vigorously.

Intellectual Property Matters

Lumify® Paragraph IV Proceedings – DRL, Somerset and Gland

On August 16, 2021, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (“B&L Inc.”) received a Notice of Paragraph IV Certification from Slayback Pharma LLC (“Slayback”), in which Slayback asserted that certain U.S. patents, each of which is listed in the FDA’s Orange Book for Lumify® (brimonidine tartrate solution) drops (the “Lumify Patents”), are either invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use or sale of Slayback’s generic drops, for which an Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) has been filed by Slayback. B&L Inc., through its affiliate Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited, exclusively licenses the Lumify Patents from Eye Therapies, LLC (“Eye Therapies”). On September 10, 2021, B&L Inc., Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited and Eye Therapies filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey against Slayback pursuant to the Hatch-Waxman Act, alleging infringement by Slayback of one or more claims of the Lumify Patents (the “Slayback Lawsuit”), thereby triggering a 30-month stay of the approval of the Slayback ANDA. Since then, U.S. Patent No. 9,259,425 has been dismissed from the case.

On May 15, 2023, the United States Patent & Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the“PTAB”) issued a Final Written Decision, finding all claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,293,742 unpatentable (IPR2022-00142). This decision was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the “Federal Circuit”). The Federal Circuit issued its opinion on

June 30, 2025, which reversed the PTAB’s claim construction of certain limitation, vacated its obviousness finding, and remanded for further proceedings.

Furthermore, two additional patents (U.S. Patent Nos. 11,596,600 and 11,833,245) have issued and been listed in the Orange Book as related to Lumify®. Lawsuits alleging infringement of these patents were filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey against Slayback and its licensees, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories S.A. and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Inc.(collectively, “DRL”) (the “DRL Lawsuits”). The Slayback Lawsuit and DRL Lawsuits were subsequently consolidated intoone district court action before the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey (3:21-cv-16766-RK-RLS). On December 15, 2023, B&L Inc., Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited, and Eye Therapies filed a Motion for a Preliminary Injunction requesting the court to enjoin any infringing activities by DRL and a hearing was held in January 2024. On May 10, 2024, the Court denied Plaintiffs’ Motion, finding that Plaintiffs had not proven that they would be “irreparably harmed” absent a preliminary injunction.

Additionally, on December 18, 2023, B&L Inc., Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited, and Eye Therapies amended its complaint in the consolidated district court action to add claims for copyright infringement, as well as claims under the Lanham Act, including trademark and trade dress infringement. DRL subsequently petitioned for inter partes review (“IPR”) of U.S. Patent Nos. 11,596,600 and 11,833,245 and the PTAB instituted both petitions (IPR2024-00467 and IPR2024-00563). Oral argument was held before the PTAB on May 13, 2025.

On July 9, 2025, settlement was reached with DRL and B&L Inc., Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited, Eye Therapies and DRL entered into a settlement agreement effective as of July 9, 2025, providing for, among other things, a market entry date of June 30, 2027 (or earlier subject to certain acceleration clauses) for DRL’s generic drops. On July 14, 2025, the consolidated district court action (3:21-cv-16766-RK-RLS) was dismissed without prejudice and on July 22, 2025, the PTAB terminated IPR2024-00467 and IPR2024-00563. On August 13, 2025, the PTAB terminated IPR2022-00142 following remand from the Federal Circuit.

On March 28, 2025, B&L Inc. received a Notice of Paragraph IV Certification from Somerset Therapeutics, LLC (“Somerset”), in which Somerset asserted that U.S. Patent Nos. 8,293,742, 9,259,425, 11,596,600 and 11,833,245, each of which is listed in the FDA’s Orange Book for Lumify® (brimonidine tartrate solution) drops, are either invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use or sale of Somerset’s generic drops, for which an ANDA has been filed by Somerset. On April 28, 2025, B&L Inc., Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited and Eye Therapies filed suit against Somerset and certain affiliates pursuant to the Hatch-Waxman Act, alleging infringement by Somerset ofone or more claims of such Lumify patents, thereby triggering a 30-month stay of the approval of the Somerset ANDA.

On April 25, 2025, B&L Inc. and Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited received a Notice of Paragraph IV Certification from Gland Pharma Limited (“Gland”), in which Gland asserted that U.S. Patent Nos. 8,293,742, 9,259,425, 11,596,600 and 11,833,245, each of which is listed in the FDA’s Orange Book for Lumify® (brimonidine tartrate solution) drops, are either invalid, unenforceable and/or will not be infringed by the commercial manufacture, use or sale of Gland’s generic drops, for which an ANDA has been filed by Gland. On April 28, 2025, B&L Inc., Bausch + Lomb Ireland Limited and Eye Therapies filed suit against Gland pursuant to the Hatch-Waxman Act, alleging infringement by Gland ofone or more claims of such Lumify patents, thereby triggering a 30-month stay of the approval of the Gland ANDA.

Bausch + Lomb remains confident in the strength of the Lumify® related patents and intends to vigorously defend its intellectual property.

In addition to the intellectual property matters described above, in connection with the Vyzulta® and Lotemax® SM products, the Company previously commenced infringement proceedings against potential generic competitors in the U.S. In connection with Vyzulta®, two matters have been resolved and dismissed andone matter was recently filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey and is ongoing. In connection with Lotemax® SM, one matter resulted in a four-day bench trial starting January 13, 2025, and the parties await a decision; another matter was recently filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey and is ongoing.

Completed or Inactive Matters

The following matters have concluded, have settled, are the subject of an agreement to settle or have otherwise been closed during or prior to the three months ended September 30, 2025 or have been inactive from the Company’s perspective for several fiscal quarters or the Company anticipates that no further material activity will take place with respect thereto. Due to the closure, settlement, inactivity or change in status of the matters referenced below, these matters will no longer appear in the Company’s future public reports and disclosures, unless required or as deemed appropriate. With respect to inactive matters, to the extent material activity takes place in subsequent quarters with respect thereto, the Company will provide updates as required or as deemed appropriate.

PreserVision® AREDS Patent Litigation

PreserVision® AREDS and PreserVision® AREDS 2 are OTC eye vitamin formulas for those with moderate-to-advanced AMD. The PreserVision® U.S. formulation patent expired in March 2021, but a patent covering methods of using the formulation remains in force into 2026. B&L Inc. has filed patent infringement proceedings against 20 named defendants in 17 proceedings claiming infringement of these patents and, in certain circumstances, related unfair competition and false advertising causes of action. All of these proceedings are now closed, with fifteen settling andtwo resulting in default. The last ongoing matter (Bausch & Lomb Inc. & PF Consumer Healthcare 1 LLC v. SBH Holdings LLC, C.A. No. 20-cv-01463-GBW-CJB (D. Del.)) was dismissed with prejudice on April 10, 2025.

New Mexico Attorney General Consumer Protection Action

BHC and Bausch Health US were named in an action brought by State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General of New Mexico, in the County of Santa Fe New Mexico First Judicial District Court (New Mexico ex rel. Balderas v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., Civil Action No. D-101-CV-2020-00013, filed on January 2, 2020), alleging consumer protection claims against Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., BHC and Bausch Health US related to Shower to Shower® and its alleged causal link to mesothelioma and other cancers. In April 2020, Bausch Health US filed a motion to dismiss, which in September 2020, the Court granted in part as to the New Mexico Medicaid Fraud Act and New Mexico Fraud Against Taxpayers Act claims and denied as to all other claims. The State of New Mexico brought claims against all defendants under the New Mexico Unfair Practices Act and other common law and equitable causes of action, alleging defendants engaged in wrongful marketing, sale and promotion of talcum powder products. The lawsuit sought to recover the cost of the talcum powder products as well as the cost of treating asbestos-related cancers allegedly caused by those products. Bausch Health US filed its answer on November 16, 2020. On December 30, 2020, Johnson & Johnson filed a Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings and on January 4, 2021, Bausch Health US filed a joinder to that motion, which was denied on March 8, 2021. Trial was scheduled to begin on May 30, 2023, until the case was stayed by an interlocutory appeal to the New Mexico Supreme Court by Johnson & Johnson. That stay was lifted on October 21, 2024 when the New Mexico Supreme Court ruled in favor of Johnson & Johnson and reversed the trial court, remanding the case back for further proceedings.

On July 14, 2022, LTL filed an adversary proceeding in the Bankruptcy Court (Case No. 21-30589, Adv. Pro. No. 22-01231) against the State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General, and obtained an injunction from the Bankruptcy Court barring the New Mexico Attorney General from continuing to prosecute the action while the bankruptcy case was pending. Because the Bankruptcy Court has ultimately dismissed both LTL’s first and second bankruptcy cases and because a stay was not revived during the newest bankruptcy case of Red River Talc LLC (successor to LTL), filed on September 20, 2024, this suit has returned to its status quo prior to LTL’s filing.

The State has negotiated a settlement of the lawsuit with Johnson & Johnson, in which BHC and its affiliates, including Bausch + Lomb, are released parties. Following completion of the settlement and payment, a consent judgment dismissing the Company and its affiliates was entered on May 5, 2025.

17. SEGMENT INFORMATION

Reportable Segments

The Company’s CEO, who is the Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker, manages the business through three operating segments, consistent with how the Company’s CEO: (i) assesses operating performance on a regular basis, (ii) makes resource allocation decisions and (iii) designates responsibilities of his direct reports. The Company operates in the following operating segments, which also qualify as reportable segments: (i) Vision Care, (ii) Pharmaceuticals and (iii) Surgical. These segments are generally determined based on the decision-making structure of Bausch + Lomb and the grouping of similar products and services.

•The Vision Care segment consists of: (i) sales of contact lenses that span the spectrum of wearing modalities, including daily disposable and frequently replaced contact lenses, and (ii) sales of contact lens care products, OTC eye drops that address various conditions, including eye allergies, conjunctivitis, dry eye and redness relief, and eye vitamin and mineral supplements.

•The Pharmaceuticals segment consists of sales of a broad line of proprietary and generic pharmaceutical products for post-operative treatments and the treatment of a number of eye conditions, such as glaucoma, eye inflammation, ocular hypertension, dry eyes and retinal diseases.

•The Surgical segment consists of sales of medical device equipment, consumables and technologies for the treatment of cataracts, corneal, vitreous and retinal eye conditions, which includes IOLs and delivery systems, phacoemulsification equipment and other surgical instruments and devices necessary for cataract surgery.

The Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker uses segment profit to assess operating performance and make resource allocation decisions for each of its segments. Segment profit is based on operating income (loss) after the elimination of intercompany transactions. Certain costs, such as Amortization of intangible assets, and Other expense, net, are not included in the measure of segment profit, as management excludes these items in assessing segment financial performance.

Corporate includes the finance, treasury, certain research and development programs, tax and legal operations of Bausch + Lomb’s businesses and incurs certain expenses, gains and losses related to the overall management of Bausch + Lomb, which are not allocated to the other business segments. In assessing segment performance and managing operations, management does not review segment assets. Furthermore, a portion of share-based compensation is considered a corporate cost, since the amount of such expense depends on company-wide performance rather than the operating performance of any single segment.

Segment Revenues and Profit

Segment revenues and profits for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 were as follows:

Revenues by Segment and by Product Category

Revenues by segment and product category were as follows:

The topten products/franchises represented 55% and 54% of total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

18. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Leasing Transaction

The Company has entered into a sale and master lease agreement with a third party. Under this agreement, on October 2, 2025, the Company sold various fixed asset equipment, for a sale price of $36 million, and then leased the equipment back through athree-year leaseback transaction. The Company will account for this transaction during the fourth quarter of 2025.