Finance of America Companies Inc

A decline in the market price of our securities also could adversely affect our ability to issue additional securities and our ability to obtain additional financing in the future.

There may be sales of a substantial amount of Class A Common Stock by certain of the Company’s shareholders and these sales could cause the price of the Company’s securities to fall.

Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, certain shareholders were entitled to demand that the Company register the resale of their securities subject to certain minimum requirements. These shareholders also have certain “piggyback” registration rights with respect to previously filed registration statements.

On June 9, 2022, our post-effective amendment No.1 on Form S-1 to Form S-3 was declared effective by the SEC (the “Registration Statement”). Further, on August 18, 2023, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 relating to the registration for offer and sale of the up to 33,893,666 shares of Class A Common Stock exchangeable by AAG/Bloom pursuant to the Exchange Agreement (such registration statement, the “AAG/Bloom Registration Statement” and together with the Registration Statement, the “Registration Statements”). The AAG/Bloom Registration Statement was declared effective by the SEC on September 1, 2023. Under the Registration Statements, such applicable parties may sell large amounts of our Class A Common Stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. Such sales could have the effect of increasing the volatility in the share price of our Class A Common Stock or putting significant downward pressure on the price of our Class A Common Stock.

Sales of substantial amounts of our Class A Common Stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales will occur, could adversely affect the market price of our Class A Common Stock and make it difficult for us to raise funds through securities offerings in the future.

The trading history of our common stock has been characterized by low trading volume.

Our Class A Common Stock started trading on NYSE on April 5, 2021. During 2023, the average daily trading volume of our Class A Common Stock was approximately 224,196 shares. We cannot predict the extent to which investor interest in us will lead to a more active trading market in our securities or how much more liquid these markets might become. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends upon the presence in the marketplace of willing buyers and sellers of our securities at any given time, which presence is dependent upon the individual decisions of investors, over which we have no control. However, our receipt of a notice of noncompliance from NYSE may adversely impact investor sentiment and result in decreased trading volume of our Class A Common Stock and, if our Class A Common Stock is ultimately delisted by NYSE, it would likely have the effect of decreasing the trading volume of our Class A Common Stock. See “—We have received notice from NYSE that our Class A Common Stock is at risk of being delisted from the exchange unless certain conditions are satisfied. There can be no assurance that we will be able to satisfy the specified conditions or, even if we are able to satisfy such conditions, that we will otherwise be able to comply with the continued listing standards of NYSE for our Class A Common Stock.” Our low trading volume could result in increased share price volatility, downward pricing pressure and inability to sell your shares at desired price levels, if at all.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish or cease publishing research or reports about the Company, its business or its market, or if they change their recommendations regarding the Company’s securities adversely, the price and trading volume of the Company’s securities could decline.

The trading market for the Company’s securities will be influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts may publish about the Company, its business, market or competitors. Securities and industry analysts do not currently, and may never (particularly if our Class A Common Stock is delisted), publish research on the Company. If no securities or industry analysts commence coverage of the Company, the Company’s share price and trading volume would likely be negatively impacted. If any of the analysts who may cover the Company change their recommendation regarding the Company’s securities adversely, or provide more favorable relative recommendations about the Company’s competitors, the price of the Company’s securities would likely decline. If any analyst who may cover the Company were to cease coverage of the Company or fail to regularly publish reports on it, the Company could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause its share price or trading volume to decline.

Our Warrants may have an adverse effect on the market price of our Class A Common Stock.

We have issued warrants to purchase 14,375,000 shares of our Class A Common Stock (“Warrants”). To the extent such Warrants are exercised, additional shares of our Class A Common Stock will be issued, which will result in dilution to our shareholders and an increase in the number of shares of Class A Common Stock eligible for resale in the public market. Sales of substantial numbers of such shares in the public market or the fact that such Warrants may be exercised could adversely affect the market price of our Class A Common Stock.

We may redeem unexpired Warrants prior to their exercise at a time that is disadvantageous to our Warrant holders, thereby making such Warrants worthless.

We have the ability to redeem outstanding Warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a price of $0.01 per Warrant; provided that the last reported sales price of our Class A Common Stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for share splits, share dividends, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading day period ending on the third trading day prior to the date we send the notice of such redemption to the Warrant holders. If and when the Warrants become redeemable by us, we may exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to register or qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state securities laws. Redemption of the outstanding Warrants could force our Warrant holders (i) to exercise Warrants and pay the exercise price at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so, (ii) to sell Warrants at the then-current market price when they might otherwise wish to hold their Warrants or (iii) to accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the outstanding Warrants are called for redemption, is likely to be substantially less than the market value of the Warrants. In addition, we may redeem Warrants after they become exercisable for a number of shares of Class A Common Stock determined based on the redemption date and the fair market value of our Class A Common Stock. Any such redemption may have similar consequences to a cash redemption described above. In addition, such redemption may occur at a time when the Warrants are “out-of-the-money,” in which case our Warrant holders would lose any potential embedded value from a subsequent increase in the value of the Class A Common Stock had the Warrants remained outstanding.

The Company’s management has limited experience in operating a public company.

Certain of the Company’s executive officers and directors have limited experience in the management of a publicly-traded company. The Company’s management team may not successfully or effectively manage its transition to operating a public company subject to complex laws, significant regulatory oversight and reporting obligations under federal securities laws. Their limited experience in operating a public company could be a significant disadvantage in that that may need to devote more of their time to activities associated with navigating these complex laws and obligations to which public companies are subject, resulting in less time being devoted to the management and growth of the Company.

The Company incurs significant increased expenses and administrative burdens as a public company, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Company faces legal, accounting, administrative and other costs and expenses as a public company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, including the requirements of Section 404, as well as rules and regulations subsequently implemented by the SEC, the Dodd-Frank Act and the rules and regulations promulgated and to be promulgated thereunder, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the securities exchanges, impose additional reporting and other obligations on public companies. Compliance with public company requirements increases costs and makes certain activities more time-consuming. For example, the Company has adopted corporate governance requirements and best practices as well as internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures, all of which have expenses associated with them. In addition, additional expenses associated with SEC reporting requirements are incurred in the ordinary course of business. Furthermore, if any issues in complying with those requirements are identified (for example, if the Company’s auditors identify a material weakness or significant deficiency in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting), the Company could incur additional costs rectifying those issues, and the existence of those issues could adversely affect the Company’s reputation or investor perceptions of it. It may also be more expensive to obtain director and officer liability insurance. Risks associated with the Company’s status as a public company may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on the Board or as executive officers. The additional reporting and other obligations imposed by these rules and regulations will increase legal and financial compliance costs and the costs of related legal, accounting and administrative activities. These increased costs require the Company to divert a significant amount of money that could otherwise be used to expand the business and achieve strategic objectives. Advocacy efforts by shareholders and third parties may also prompt additional changes in governance and reporting requirements, which could further increase costs.

The Company may not be able to effectively continue to implement and maintain controls and procedures required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act that are applicable to us.

As a public company, we are required to comply with the SEC’s rules implementing Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which require management to certify financial and other information in our quarterly and annual reports and provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting. To continue to comply with such requirements, we may need to undertake various actions from time to time, such as implementing additional internal controls and procedures and hiring additional accounting or internal audit staff. Management may not be able to effectively continue to implement and maintain controls and procedures that adequately respond to the regulatory compliance and reporting requirements that are applicable to the Company. If management is not able to do so, it may not be able to assess whether the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting are effective, which may subject the Company to adverse regulatory consequences and could harm investor confidence and the market price of our securities. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm is required to issue a report on the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. In the future, our independent registered public accounting firm may issue a report that is adverse in the event that it is not satisfied with the level at which the controls of the Company are documented, designed or operating.

If we experience material weaknesses or deficiencies in the future or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately or timely report our financial results, in which case our business may be harmed, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, and the price of our securities may decline.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal controls over financial reporting such that a reasonable possibility exists that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The identification of any new material weaknesses in the future could limit our ability to prevent or detect a misstatement of our accounts or disclosures and could result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements. In such case, we may be unable to maintain compliance with securities law requirements regarding timely filing of periodic reports in addition to applicable stock exchange listing requirements, investors may lose confidence in our financial reporting and the price of our securities may decline as a result.

The Company is a “controlled company” within the meaning of NYSE rules and, as a result, qualifies for exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements. The stockholders of the Company do not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to such requirements.

The Company’s principal stockholders are parties to a stockholders agreement (the “Stockholders Agreement”) and as of December 31, 2023, beneficially owned approximately 70.8% of the combined voting power of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Class B Common Stock”). As a result, the Company is a “controlled company” within the meaning of NYSE corporate governance standards. Under these corporate governance standards, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power in the election of directors is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements. For example, controlled companies:

•are not required to have a board of directors that is composed of a majority of “independent directors,” as defined under NYSE rules;

•are not required to have a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors; and

•are not required to have director nominations be made, or recommended to the full board of directors, by its independent directors or by a nominations committee that is composed entirely of independent directors.

Accordingly, the stockholders of the Company will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of NYSE.

The principal stockholders control the Company and their interests may conflict with the Company’s or yours in the future.

As of December 31, 2023, principal stockholders beneficially owned approximately 70.8% of the combined voting power of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock. Moreover, the Company agreed to nominate to our Board individuals designated by the principal stockholders in accordance with the Stockholders Agreement. The principal stockholders retain the right to designate directors subject to the maintenance of certain ownership requirements in us. Even when the principal stockholders cease to own shares of Company stock representing a majority of the total voting power, for so long as the principal stockholders continue to own a significant percentage of the Company’s stock, they will still be able to significantly influence or effectively control the composition of the Board and the approval of actions requiring stockholder approval through their voting power. Accordingly, for such period of time, the principal stockholders will have significant influence with respect to the Company’s management, business plans and policies, including the appointment and removal of the Company’s officers.

In particular, for so long as the principal stockholders continue to own a significant percentage of the Company’s stock, the principal stockholders will be able to cause or prevent a change of control of the Company or a change in the composition of the Board and could preclude any unsolicited acquisition of the Company. The concentration of ownership could deprive you of an opportunity to receive a premium for your shares of Class A Common Stock as part of a sale of the Company and ultimately might affect the market price of the Class A Common Stock.

As of December 31, 2023, the principal stockholders owned approximately 51.9% of the Class A LLC Units. Because they hold ownership interests directly in FoA, the principal stockholders may have conflicting interests with holders of shares of the Class A Common Stock. For example, if FoA makes distributions to the Company, the principal stockholders will also be entitled to receive such distributions pro rata in accordance with the percentages of their respective membership interests in FoA and their preferences as to the timing and amount of any such distributions may differ from those of the Company’s public stockholders. The principal stockholders may also have different tax positions from us which could influence their decisions regarding whether and when to dispose of assets, especially in light of the existence of the Tax Receivable Agreements, whether and when to incur new or refinance existing indebtedness, and whether and when the Company should terminate the Tax Receivable Agreements and accelerate its obligations thereunder. In addition, the structuring of future transactions may take into consideration the principal stockholders’ tax or other considerations even where no similar benefit would accrue to the Company.

The A&R Charter does not limit the ability of the principal stockholders to compete with the Company and they may have investments in businesses whose interests conflict with the Company.

The principal stockholders and their respective affiliates engage in a broad spectrum of activities, including investments in businesses that may compete with the Company. In the ordinary course of their business activities, the principal stockholders and their respective affiliates may engage in activities where their interests conflict with the Company’s interests or those of its stockholders. The Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (the “A&R Charter”) provides that none of the principal stockholders or any of their respective affiliates or any of the Company’s directors who are not employed by the Company (including any non-employee director who serves as one of the Company’s officers in both his or her director and officer capacities) or his or her affiliates have any duty to refrain from engaging, directly or indirectly, in the same business activities or similar business activities or lines of business in which the Company operates. The principal stockholders and their respective affiliates also may pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to the Company’s business, and, as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to the Company. In addition, the principal stockholders may have an interest in the Company pursuing acquisitions, divestitures and other transactions that, in their judgment, could enhance their investment, even though such transactions might involve risks to the Company and its stockholders.

Anti-takeover provisions under Delaware law could make an acquisition of the Company, which may be beneficial to the Company’s stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by the Company’s stockholders to replace or remove the Company’s management.

The A&R Charter and the Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (the “A&R Bylaws”) contain provisions that may make the merger or acquisition of the Company more difficult without the approval of the Board. Among other things, these provisions:

•provide that subject to the rights of the holders of any preferred stock and the rights granted pursuant to the Stockholders Agreement, vacancies and newly created directorships may be filled only by the remaining directors at any time the principal stockholders beneficially own less than 30% of the total voting power of all then outstanding shares of the Company’s capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors;

•allow the Company to authorize the issuance of shares of one or more series of preferred stock, including in connection with a stockholder rights plan, financing transactions or otherwise, the terms of which series may be established and the shares of which may be issued without stockholder approval, and which may include super voting, special approval, dividend or other rights or preferences superior to the rights of the holders of common stock;

•prohibit stockholder action by written consent from and after the date on which the principal stockholders beneficially own at least 30% of the total voting power of all then outstanding shares of the Company’s capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors unless such action is recommended by all directors then in office;

•provide for certain limitations on convening special stockholder meetings; and

•establish advance notice requirements for nominations for elections to our Board or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.

Further, as a Delaware corporation, the Company is also subject to provisions of Delaware law, which may impede or discourage a takeover attempt that the Company’s stockholders may find beneficial. These anti-takeover provisions and other provisions under Delaware law may discourage, delay or prevent a transaction involving a change in control of the Company, including actions that the Company’s stockholders may deem advantageous, or negatively affect the trading price of the Class A Common Stock. These provisions may also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing and to cause the Company to take other corporate actions you desire. For further discussion of these and other such anti-takeover provisions, see the section titled “Description of Securities—Certain Anti-Takeover Provisions of Our A&R Charter and A&R Bylaws.”

The A&R Charter designates the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or the federal district courts of the United States of America, as applicable, as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by the Company’s stockholders, which could limit the Company’s stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with the Company or the Company’s directors, officers or other employees.

The A&R Charter provides that, unless the Company consents to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for: (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; (ii) any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty owed by any current or former director, officer, stockholder or employee of the Company to the Company or its stockholders; (iii) any action asserting a claim against the Company arising under the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”), the A&R Charter or the A&R Bylaws (together, the “Organizational Documents”) or as to which the DGCL confers jurisdiction on the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware; or (iv) any action asserting a claim against the Company that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine.

The A&R Charter further provides that, unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the federal district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the federal securities laws of the United States, including the Securities Act and the Exchange Act and, in each case, the applicable rules and regulations promulgated thereunder.

Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in any shares of the Company’s capital stock shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the forum provision in the A&R Charter. This choice-of-forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a different judicial forum, including one that it may find favorable or convenient for a specified class of disputes with the Company or the Company’s directors, officers, other stockholders or employees, which may discourage such lawsuits. Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision of the A&R Charter inapplicable or unenforceable with respect to one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, the Company may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations and result in a diversion of the time and resources of the Company’s management and Board.

You may be diluted by the future issuance of additional Class A Common Stock or Class A LLC Units in connection with the Company’s incentive plans, acquisitions or otherwise.

As of December 31, 2023, the Company has 4,258,500 shares of Class A Common Stock issued and unvested and 5,899,400,759 shares of Class A Common Stock authorized but unissued, including 121,277,826 shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon exchange of Class A LLC Units that are held by the FoA Equity unitholders, 11,692,990 shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon exchange of Class A LLC Units that are held by AAG/Bloom, 14,200,676 shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon exchange of Class A LLC Units that are issuable to AAG/Bloom in connection with our acquisition of operational assets from AAG/Bloom and 14,375,000 shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants. The A&R Charter authorizes the Company to issue these shares of Class A Common Stock and options, rights, warrants and appreciation rights relating to Class A Common Stock for the consideration and on the terms and conditions established by the Board in its sole discretion, whether in connection with acquisitions or otherwise. Similarly, the A&R LLC Agreement permits FoA Equity to issue an unlimited number of additional limited liability company interests of FoA Equity with designations, preferences, rights, powers and duties that are different from, and may be senior to, those applicable to the Class A LLC Units, and which may be exchangeable for shares of Class A Common Stock. Additionally, as of December 31, 2023, the Company has reserved an aggregate of 20,659,781 shares of Class A Common Stock and Class A LLC Units for issuance under the Finance of America Companies Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan. Any Class A Common Stock that the Company issues, including under the Finance of America Companies Inc. 2021 Omnibus Incentive Plan or other equity incentive plans that we may adopt in the future, would dilute the percentage ownership held by the investors who own shares of Class A Common Stock.

The Company may issue preferred stock whose terms could materially adversely affect the voting power or value of its Class A Common Stock.

The A&R Charter authorizes the Company to issue, without the approval of its stockholders, one or more classes or series of preferred stock having such designations, preferences, limitations and relative rights, including preferences over the Company’s Class A Common Stock respecting dividends and distributions, as the Board may determine. The terms of one or more classes or series of preferred stock could adversely impact the voting power or value of the Class A Common Stock. For example, the Company might grant holders of preferred stock the right to elect some number of the Company’s directors in all events or on the happening of specified events or the right to veto specified transactions. Similarly, the repurchase or redemption rights or liquidation preferences the Company might assign to holders of preferred stock could affect the residual value of the Class A Common Stock.