Playtika Holding Corp.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(In millions, unless specified otherwise)

NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of business and organization

Playtika Holding Corp. (“Playtika”) and its subsidiaries (together with Playtika, the “Company”) is one of the world’s leading developers of mobile games creating fun, innovative experiences that entertain and engage its users. It has built best-in-class live game operations services and a proprietary technology platform to support its portfolio of games which enable it to drive strong user engagement and monetization. The Company’s games are free-to-play, and the Company seeks to provide novel, curated in-game content and offers to its users at optimal points in their game journeys to drive user engagement and monetization.

Basis of presentation and consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) and include Playtika and all subsidiaries in which the Company has a controlling financial interest. Control generally equates to ownership percentage, whereby (i) affiliates that are more than 50% owned are consolidated; (ii) investments in affiliates of 50% or less but greater than 20% are generally accounted for using the equity method where the Company has determined that it has significant influence over the entities; and (iii) investments in affiliates of 20% or less are generally accounted for at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer.

The significant accounting policies referenced in the annual consolidated financial statements of the Company as of December 31, 2025 have been applied consistently in these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been recorded within the accompanying financial statements, consisting of normal, recurring adjustments, and all intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2026 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2026. For further information, reference is made to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, as filed with the SEC on February 26, 2026.

Financial statements in United States dollars

The currency of the primary economic environment in which the operations of Playtika and its subsidiaries are conducted is the U.S. dollar ("dollar"); thus, the dollar is the functional currency of Playtika and its subsidiaries. Playtika and its subsidiaries' transactions and balances denominated in dollars are presented at their original amounts. Non-dollar transactions and balances have been remeasured to dollars in accordance with ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters. All transaction gains and losses from remeasurement of monetary balance sheet items denominated in non-dollar currencies are reflected as financial income or expenses, as appropriate.

During the first quarter of 2026, the Company changed the functional currency of a certain subsidiary from its respective local currency to the U.S. dollar. The change in functional currency is due to increased exposure to the U.S. dollar as a result of a change in facts and circumstances in the primary economic environment in which the subsidiary operates.

Use of estimates

The preparation of the interim consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions. The Company’s management believes that the estimates, judgments and assumptions used are reasonable based upon information available at the time they are made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the dates of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

-6-

Concentration of credit risk and significant customers

Financial instruments, which potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, restricted cash, accounts receivable and derivative contracts. The Company’s investment policy imposes certain maturity limits on the Company’s portfolio and restricts the permitted investments to the purchase of bank deposits and highly rated fixed income securities.

Apple and Google are significant distribution and payment platforms for the Company's games. A significant portion of the Company’s revenues has been generated from players who accessed the Company's games through these platforms. Therefore, the Company's accounts receivable are derived mainly from sales through thesetwo platforms.

The following table summarizes the major accounts receivable of the Company as a percentage of the total accounts receivable as of the dates indicated:

Accounts receivable are recorded at their transaction amounts and do not bear interest. The Company bases its allowance for credit losses on management's best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company's existing accounts receivable based on historical collection experience and current economic and market conditions. There wereno credit losses for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025.

Severance Pay

On January 14, 2026, the Company announced a reduction in workforce by approximately fifteen percent, which was substantially complete during the first quarter of 2026. Severance liabilities associated with this reduction in force were recognized as incurred within operating expenses on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income and totaled approximately $13.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026.

Cash and cash equivalents and Short-term investments

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase. Cash equivalents include investments in term deposits, commercial papers and money market funds that can be redeemed immediately at the current net asset value.

Investments with maturities of more than three months but less than one year from the date of purchase are included in short-term investments. Such short-term investments include investments in commercial papers.

The Company accounts for investments in debt securities in accordance with ASC No. 320, "Investments - Debt Securities". The Company determines the appropriate classification of its investments at the time of purchase and reevaluates such designation at each balance sheet date. Unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in shareholders' deficit. Gains and losses are determined using the specific identification method and recognized when realized in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

The Company periodically evaluates its available-for-sale debt securities for impairment in accordance with ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. If the amortized cost of an individual security exceeds its fair value, the Company considers its intent to sell the security or whether it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized basis. If either of these criteria are met, the Company writes down the security to its fair value and records the impairment charge in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss. If neither of these criteria are met, the Company assesses whether credit loss exists. In

-7- making this assessment, the Company considers the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, any changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency, and any adverse conditions specifically related to the security, among other factors. If this assessment indicates that a credit loss may exist, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security are compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss exists and an allowance for credit losses will be recorded, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. Any additional impairment not recorded through an allowance for credit losses is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss).

For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, credit losses were immaterial.

Derivative instruments

The Company uses interest rate swap contracts to reduce its exposure to fluctuating interest rates associated with the Company’s variable rate debt, and to effectively increase the portion of debt upon which the Company pays a fixed interest rate. The Company’s interest rate swap agreements are designated as cash flow hedges under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”), involving the receipt of variable amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreement, without the exchange of the underlying notional amount. These hedges are highly effective in offsetting changes in the Company’s future expected cash flows due to the fluctuation of the Company’s variable rate debt.

The Company monitors the effectiveness of its hedges on a quarterly basis, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The Company performed a regression analysis at inception of the hedging relationship and at period end in which it compared the change in the fair value of the swap transaction and the change in fair value of a hypothetical interest rate swap having terms that identically match the terms of the debt's interest rate payments based on historical swap rates. Based upon this analysis, the Company concluded that the hedging instruments are expected to be highly effective at offsetting changes in the hedged transactions attributable to the risk being hedged. For each future reporting period, the Company will continue performing retrospective and prospective assessments of hedge effectiveness in a single regression analysis by updating the regression analysis that was prepared at the inception of the hedging relationship.

The Company uses foreign currency derivative contracts to reduce its exposure to fluctuating exchange rates between the United States dollar (as the Company’s functional currency) and certain expense lines denominated in Euros (“EUR”), Israeli Shekels (“ILS”), Polish Zloty (“PLN”) and Romanian Leu (“RON”). The Company’s derivative contracts are designated as cash flow hedges under ASC 815. The Company monitors the effectiveness of its hedges on a quarterly basis, both qualitatively and quantitatively, and expects these hedges to remain highly effective at offsetting fluctuations in exchange rates through their respective maturity dates. See Note 6, Derivative Instruments, for additional discussion.

The fair value of derivative financial instruments is recognized as an asset or liability at each balance sheet date, with changes in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income on the consolidated statements of comprehensive income until the future underlying transactions occur. The fair value approximates the amount the Company would pay or receive if these contracts were settled at the respective valuation dates. The inputs used to measure the fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements and foreign currency derivative contracts are categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as established by ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement (“ASC 820”). See Note 7, Fair Value Measurements, for additional discussion.

Cash flows from derivatives, which are designated as accounting hedges, are presented consistently with the cash flow classification of the related hedged items.

Investment in unconsolidated entities

The Company holds certain equity investments in various unconsolidated entities that, based upon the structure of the investment, are not within the scope of equity method investment accounting that would lead to the consolidation conclusions above. Instead, these investments fall within the scope of ASC 321, Investments - Equity Securities. As permitted within that guidance, the Company has elected to account for these investments at cost less impairment, adjusted for changes in fair value from observable transactions for identical or similar investments of the same issuer as of the respective transaction

-8- dates. During the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, no changes were recorded due to impairment or changes in fair value.

Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders

For all periods presented herein, basic net income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average common shares outstanding. Diluted net income (loss) per share reflects the effect of all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average of all common and potentially dilutive shares outstanding. Performance Stock Units (“PSUs”) are considered potentially dilutive as of the first day of the reporting period in which the underlying performance metric is achieved. In the event of a loss, diluted shares are not considered because of their anti-dilutive effect. The Company uses the treasury stock method on a grant-by-grant basis as the method for determining the dilutive effect of options, Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) and PSUs. Under this method, it is assumed that the hypothetical proceeds received upon settlement are used to repurchase common shares at the average market price during the period.

Recently issued accounting standards not yet adopted by the Company

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-10, Government Grants (Topic 832), which addresses authoritative guidance on the accounting for government grants received by business entities. ASU 2025-10 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2028, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2025-10.

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements, which clarifies the guidance in Topic 270 to improve the consistency of interim financial reporting. The ASU provides a comprehensive list of required interim disclosures and introduces a disclosure principle requiring entities to disclose events since the end of the last annual reporting period that have a material impact on the entity. ASU 2025-11 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting ASU 2025-11.

NOTE 2. SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS

Short-term investments at December 31, 2025 are as follows (in millions):

There wereno short-term investments as of March 31, 2026.

-9-

NOTE 3. ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 are as follows (in millions):

NOTE 4. DEBT

Book value of debt in the table above is reported net of deferred financing costs and original issue discount of $18.5 million and $20.7 million at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively.

Credit Agreement

The Company has a $1.9 billion senior secured first lien term loan (the “Term Loan”) maturing on March 11, 2028 and a $550 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) (together, the “Credit Agreement”), maturing on March 6, 2027 (subject to certain conditions, see below). The Term Loan requires quarterly principal payments equal to 0.25% of the original aggregate principal amount of the Term Loan with balance due at maturity.

The Revolving Credit Facility includes a maximum first-priority net senior secured leverage ratio financial maintenance covenant of 6.25 to 1.0. At March 31, 2026, the Company’s first-priority net senior secured leverage ratio was 1.4 to 1.0.

The Company was in compliance with its financial and other covenants under the Credit Agreement as of March 31, 2026.

On April 23, 2025, the Company entered into a Fourth Amendment (the “Fourth Amendment”) to the Credit Agreement which, among other things, (a) amended the Pricing Grid (as defined in the Credit Agreement) for the Company’s revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement (the “Revolving Credit Facility”), and (b) decreased the aggregate principal amount of the Revolving Credit Facility from $600 million to $550 million. The Fourth Amendment was also intended to extend the maturity of the Revolving Credit Facility to September 11, 2027, subject to the Credit Agreement being filed and registered with the National Development and Reform Commission of the People’s Republic of China (the “NDRC”) unless the NDRC states in writing that such registration is not required. This filing requirement with the NDRC is required of the Company’s controlling shareholder due to the fact that the controlling shareholder is controlled by a citizen of the People’s Republic of China. On December 9, 2025, the Company’s controlling shareholder elected to withdraw its filing of the Credit Agreement with the NDRC and, as a result, the maturity of the Revolving Credit Facility was not extended under the Fourth Amendment.

-10-

On February 16, 2026, the Company entered into an Incremental Assumption Agreement No. 4 and Fifth Amendment (the “Fifth Amendment”) to the Credit Agreement which, among other things, effected a refinancing of the Company’s existing $550 million revolving credit facility under the Credit Agreement (the “New Revolving Credit Facility”) on March 11, 2026 subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions set forth therein. The New Revolving Credit Facility will mature on March 6, 2027. Other than the revised maturity date, the New Revolving Credit Facility retains the same material terms as the Company’s existing revolving credit facility immediately prior to the effectiveness of the Fifth Amendment.

Pursuant to the terms of the Fourth Amendment, borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at a rate equal to, at the Company’s option, either (a) a forward-looking term rate based on the secured overnight financing rate for the applicable interest period (“Term SOFR”), subject to a floor of 0.00% or (b) a base rate determined by reference to the highest of (i) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (ii) the prime rate as determined by the administrative agent and (iii) the one-month Term SOFR plus 1.00% per annum, in each case plus an applicable margin. Such applicable margin with respect to the Revolving Credit Facility is 3.00% per annum in the case of any Term SOFR loan and 2.00% per annum in the case of any base rate loan, subject tothree 0.25% step-downs based on the Company’s first lien net leverage ratio. In addition, on a quarterly basis, the Company is required to pay each lender under the Revolving Credit Facility a commitment fee in respect of any unused commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility in the amount of 0.50% of the principal amount of the unused commitments of such lender, subject totwo 0.125% step-downs based on the Company’s first lien net leverage ratio.

Other than what is disclosed above, other significant terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement have not changed from what was disclosed in Note 13, Debtin our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2026.

Offering of 4.250% Senior Notes due 2029

Indenture

On March 11, 2021, the Company issued $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 4.250% senior notes due 2029 (the “Notes”) under an indenture, dated March 11, 2021 (the “Indenture”), among the Company, the subsidiary guarantors party thereto and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”).

Maturity and Interest

The Notes mature on March 15, 2029. Interest on the Notes will accrue at a rate of 4.250% per annum. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually in cash in arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each year.

The significant terms and conditions of the Notes have not changed from what was disclosed in Note 13, Debt in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 26, 2026.

NOTE 5. EQUITY TRANSACTIONS AND STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

Overview of Stock Incentive Plan

On May 26, 2020, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the Playtika Holding Corp. 2020 Incentive Award Plan (the “Plan”).

As of March 31, 2026, a total of 63,970,413 shares of the Company’s common stock had been allocated to awards granted under the Plan and 16,231,005 shares remained available for future grants.

Stock repurchase program

On May 9, 2024, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program for up to $150 million of the Company’s common stock. Under the repurchase program, repurchases can be made using a variety of methods, which may include open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. The specific timing, price and size of purchases will depend on prevailing stock prices, general economic and market conditions, and other

-11- considerations. The repurchase program does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of common stock, and may be suspended or discontinued at any time at the Company’s discretion. There wereno shares of common stock repurchased and retired during the three months ended March 31, 2026. As of March 31, 2026, $129.0 million remains available under the Company’s stock repurchase program.

Stock options

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock option activity during the three months ended March 31, 2026:

The Company used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the grant-date fair value associated with all employee stock options. There wereno options granted in the three months ended March 31, 2026 or 2025.

RSUs

The following table summarizes the Company’s RSU activity during the three months ended March 31, 2026:

The Company used the associated per-share value at the time of grant to determine the compensation cost to be recognized for the RSUs granted during the three months ended March 31, 2026. For grants of RSUs during period when the Company expects to pay dividends, the Company estimates the fair value for compensation cost using the value of its common stock on

-12- the date of grant, reduced by the present value of dividends expected to be paid on its shares of common stock prior to vesting.

The table below summarizes the assumptions used for the RSUs granted during the three months ended March 31, 2025:

PSUs

The following table summarizes the Company’s PSU activity during the three months ended March 31, 2026:

(1) The number of PSUs outstanding represent the total number of PSUs granted to each recipient eligible to vest if the Company meets its highest specified performance goals for the applicable period.

Stock-based compensation

The following table summarizes stock-based compensation costs as reported by award type (in millions):

-13-

The following table summarizes stock-based compensation costs, net of amounts capitalized, as reported on the Company’s consolidated statement of comprehensive income (in millions):

The Company capitalized stock-based compensation of $0.1 million and $0.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.

As of March 31, 2026, the Company’s total unrecognized stock-based compensation expenses related to stock options, RSUs and PSUs was approximately $0.2 million, $87.4 million and $14.4 million, respectively. The expense related to stock options, RSUs and PSUs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 0.8 years,2.4 years and 1.5 years, respectively.

NOTE 6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

Interest rate swap agreements

In March 2021, the Company entered intotwo interest rate swap agreements, each with a notional value of $250 million. Each of these swap agreements is with a different financial institution as the counterparty to reduce the Company’s counterparty risk. The initial terms of each swap required the Company to pay a fixed interest rate of 0.9275% in exchange for receiving one-month LIBOR. In June 2023 thesetwo interest rate swap agreements were amended so that effective July 31, 2023, the Company will pay a fixed interest rate of 0.85% in exchange for receiving one-month term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”). The amendment did not impact the hedge effectiveness.

The interest rate swap agreements settle monthly commencing in April 2021 through their termination dates on April 30, 2026. The estimated fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis.

In January 2023, the Company entered intotwo additional interest rate swap agreements, each with a notional value of $250 million. Each of these swap agreements is with a different financial institution, and each swap requires the Company to pay a fixed interest rate of 3.435% in exchange for receiving one-month LIBOR forsix months and one-month Term SOFR afterwards. The interest rate swap agreements settle monthly commencing in February 2023 through their termination dates on February 28, 2028. The estimated fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements is derived from a discounted cash flow analysis.

The aggregate fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap agreements was a net asset of $2.9 million as of March 31, 2026, and was recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets based upon the timing of the underlying expected cash flows in amounts detailed in Note 7, Fair Value Measurements.

Foreign currency hedge agreements

At March 31, 2026, the Company had outstanding derivative contracts to purchase certain foreign currencies, including EUR, ILS, RON, and PLN at future dates. The amount of future salary expenses the Company had hedged was approximately $245.4 million, and all contracts are expected to mature during the upcoming 12 months. The aggregate fair value of the Company’s derivative contracts was a net asset of $4.5 million as of March 31, 2026 and was recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in amounts detailed in Note 7, Fair Value Measurements.

-14-

The following table summarizes the volume of derivative instrument activity (in millions):

NOTE 7. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company accounts for fair value in accordance with ASC 820. Fair value is defined under ASC 820 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under ASC 820 must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company uses a three-tier hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The following table summarizes the fair value of the Company’s long-term debt for disclosure purposes (in millions):

The estimated fair value of the Company’s term loan is based upon the prices at which the Company’s debt traded in the days immediately preceding the balance sheet date. As the trading volume of the Company’s debt is low relative to the overall debt balance, the Company does not believe that the associated transactions represent an active market, and therefore this indication of value represents a level 2 fair value input.

-15-

The following table sets forth the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025 (in millions):

• Represents an amount less than $0.1

The carrying value of accounts receivable, accounts payables, restricted cash, and the majority of cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the short time to expected payment or receipt of cash.

The Company classifies its short term investments, derivative financial instruments and some cash equivalents within Level 2 because they are valued using inputs other than quoted prices which are directly or indirectly observable in the market, including readily-available pricing sources for the identical underlying security which may not be actively traded.

The change in fair value of contingent consideration payable was valued using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3), was included in the general and administrative expenses in the Company’s consolidated statements of comprehensive income and consisted of the following (in millions):

(1)Amount comprised of $829.0 million for SuperPlay acquisition.

The Company estimated the fair value of its SuperPlay contingent consideration liability using a Monte Carlo simulation to model components of cash flow analyses. The significant assumptions used in the SuperPlay model include revenue volatility

-16- of 10%, discount rate of 11.8% and a risk free rate of 4.9%. These fair value measurements are based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represent Level 3 measurements as defined in ASC 820. The extent to which the actual results differ from assumptions made within the simulation and analyses, along with adjustments resulting from the passage of time, will result in changes in these liabilities in future periods. Based on certain gross revenue growth and Adjusted EBITDA metrics of SuperPlay during the calendar year 2026, earnout payments could exceed currently estimated amounts.

The Company has not elected the fair value measurement option under ASC 825 for any financial assets or liabilities.

NOTE 8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

On November 13, 2023, plaintiff Gina Burt filed a lawsuit against the Company and its subsidiary, Playtika Ltd., in the Circuit Court of Coffee County, Tennessee, alleging that the Company’s social casino-themed games are unlawful gambling under Tennessee law. The lawsuit seeks to recover all amounts paid by Tennessee residents to the Company in connection with its games during the period beginningone year before the filing of the lawsuit until the case is resolved but excluding any residents who spent $75,000 or more during such time period. The plaintiff filed an amended complaint on August 28, 2025, adding several individual plaintiffs. The Company removed the case to federal court on September 29, 2025. On January 12, 2026, Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed claims by plaintiffs Gina Burt, Don Burt and Jamie Trimble, proceeding with Hunter Trimble as the sole named plaintiff. In response to a joint motion of the parties, on January 28, 2026, the court entered an order compelling arbitration of plaintiff’s claims. Plaintiff filed an arbitration demand on March 20, 2026. As the case is in preliminary stages, the Company cannot estimate what impact, if any, the litigation may have on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. The Company intends to defend this case vigorously.

On March 8, 2023, plaintiff Gayla Hamilton Mills filed a lawsuit against the Company and its subsidiary, Playtika Ltd., in the Circuit Court of Franklin County, Alabama, alleging that the Company’s social casino-themed games are unlawful gambling under Alabama law. The lawsuit seeks to recover all amounts paid by Alabama residents to the Company in connection with its games during the period beginningone year before the filing of the lawsuit until the case is resolved. After the Company removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, plaintiff dismissed the complaint and filed a very similar new complaint in the Circuit Court of Franklin County, Alabama on August 25, 2023. The new complaint asserted the same cause of action and bases for relief, but limited the requested recovery to the amounts paid to the Company in connection with its games only by those Alabama residents who spent less than $75,000 during theone year before the filing of the lawsuit until the case is resolved. The court ordered arbitration and stayed the case on August 20, 2025. The parties held a preliminary arbitration conference call on December 5, 2025 and submitted initial briefs on March 20, 2026. As the case is in preliminary stages, the Company cannot estimate what impact, if any, the litigation may have on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. The Company intends to defend this case vigorously.

On June 6, 2025, plaintiff Stuart Mills filed a putative class action lawsuit against the Company and its subsidiary, Playtika Ltd., on behalf of all Alabama-based players of the Company’s games in the Circuit Court of Franklin County, Alabama. The suit, like the suit brought by Gayla Hamilton Mills, alleges that the Company’s casino-themed social games are unlawful gambling under Alabama law. The lawsuit seeks to recover all amounts paid by Alabama residents to the Company in connection with its games during the period beginningone year before the filing of the lawsuit until the case is resolved. The suit was filed by the same counsel who represent Gayla Hamilton Mills. The Company removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama on July 11, 2025. Plaintiff’s motion to remand to state court was filed on August 11, 2025. The court denied the motion to remand and compelled the parties to arbitration on January 20, 2026. Plaintiff filed a petition seeking permission for interlocutory review by the Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals of the denial of his motion to remand on January 30, 2026. The court denied the petition on February 19, 2026 and plaintiff filed an arbitration demand on March 11, 2026. As the case is in preliminary stages, the Company cannot estimate what impact, if any, the litigation may have on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows

On August 22, 2024, plaintiff Dianne Fuqua filed a lawsuit against the Company and its subsidiary, Playtika Ltd., in the District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, alleging that the Company’s casino-themed social games are unlawful gambling under Kentucky law. The lawsuit sought to recover three times the amount paid by Kentucky residents to the Company from its games during the period from August 2019 through June 2023 plus interest, costs and any other relief to which plaintiff is entitled to. On November 21, 2025, the court on its own initiative ordered both parties to submit briefs addressing whether plaintiff possesses Article III (constitutional) standing for purposes of jurisdiction in federal court. The

-17- parties submitted simultaneous briefs on December 22, 2025, in response to that order. On March 26, 2026, the court dismissed the case for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. On April 24, 2026, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal with the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. At this stage, the Company cannot estimate what impact, if any, the litigation may have on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. The Company intends to defend this case vigorously.

On October 27, 2025, plaintiff Andrew Wright filed a putative class action lawsuit against the Company and its subsidiary, Playtika Ltd., in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, alleging that the Company’s social casino-themed games are unlawful gambling under Utah law. The lawsuit seeks to recover twice the amount of economic losses suffered by Utah residents to the Company in connection with its social casino-themed games plus interest and attorneys’ fees. The Company filed a motion to compel arbitration on February 17, 2026. On April 15, 2026, the court granted our motion to compel arbitration and stayed the case. At this stage, the Company cannot estimate what impact, if any, the litigation may have on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. The Company intends to defend this case vigorously.

On October 29, 2025, plaintiff William Barbarino filed a putative class action lawsuit against the Company and its subsidiary, Playtika Ltd., in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging that the Company’s social casino-themed games are unlawful gambling under federal and New Jersey law. The lawsuit seeks to recover up tothree times the amount of economic losses suffered by New Jersey residents to the Company in connection with its social casino-themed games plus interest, attorneys’ fees and other relief to which the plaintiff and the putative class may be entitled. The parties filed a joint stipulation and proposed order submitting the claims to arbitration, staying the case and preserving the parties’ positions on January 27, 2026. As the case is in preliminary stages, the Company cannot estimate what impact, if any, the litigation may have on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. The Company intends to defend this case vigorously.

On June 24, 2025, we received a letter from the Attorney General of the State of Washington alleging that our social casino-themed and bingo-themed games violate state gambling and consumer protection laws, and requesting that we pay certain monetary penalties and prevent those games from being available to play in the state in the future. The Attorney General initiated a lawsuit in King County Superior Court in the State of Washington on February 3, 2026, against the Company and several of its subsidiaries asserting those same allegations. The Attorney General is seeking injunctive and declaratory relief, recovery of monies spent by Washington players in the games, civil statutory penalties, costs and fees, and other relief. The Company’s response to the complaint is due on May 18, 2026. As the case is in preliminary stages, the Company cannot estimate what impact, if any, the litigation may have on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. The Company intends to defend this case vigorously.

On July 8, 2025, the Company received pre-arbitration notices from another law firm purporting to represent 3,860 claimants who have played the Company’s games and intend to file arbitration demands alleging that the Company’s social casino-themed games violate state laws against gambling and that the games use false, deceptive and misleading practices. The notice demands the payment of the greater of $5,000 or the actual amount of in-game losses for the claimants, plus punitive and other damages and attorneys’ fees as well as the cessation of the alleged unlawful conduct. On August 5, 2025, we were notified that the law firm was continuing to solicit claimants and that they now represented 4,688 claimants. On November 4, 2025, the law firm filed arbitration demands on behalf of 1,642 claimants. On March 23, 2026, the claimants filed an amended demand naming certain of the Company’s officers as additional respondents. The amended demand alleges that the officers engaged in fraud and racketeering by virtue of their authority over the Company’s games and practices which the claimant alleges violate gambling and consumer protections laws. As of the date hereof, the Company lacks adequate information to assess the nature or validity of these claims. As such, the Company cannot estimate what impact, if any, these claims may have on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. The Company intends to defend these claims vigorously.

On February 10, 2026, the Company received pre-arbitration notices from another law firm purporting to represent 3,061 claimants who have played the Company’s games and intend to file arbitration demands alleging that the Company’s games violate state laws against gambling, that the games use unfair and deceptive practices and that the Company has been unjustly enriched. The notice demands the full restitution of all amounts expended by the claimants, restitution and disgorgement, interest, and other damages and attorneys’ fees. As of the date hereof, the Company lacks adequate information to assess the nature or validity of these claims. As such, the Company cannot estimate what impact, if any, these claims may have on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. The Company intends to defend these claims vigorously.

-18-

On December 8, 2025, Toni Morrow filed a putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington against SuperPlay Ltd., relating to the game Dice Dreams. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the game constitutes unlawful gambling under Washington law and includes unfair and deceptive practices in connection with in-game purchase offers and purported “sales”, and seeks, inter alia, injunctive relief and restitution. SuperPlay Ltd. filed its response to the complaint on April 24, 2026. The matter is in its preliminary stages. Accordingly, the Company cannot estimate what impact, if any, it may have on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. The Company intends to defend this matter vigorously.

On December 10, 2025, Maor Ben Shushan filed a Motion for Certification of a class action lawsuit in the District Court in Central Lod, Israel, against Playtika Group Israel Ltd. (“PGI”), alleging misleading price presentation in connection with in-app purchases offered to Israeli users in U.S. dollars in several Playtika games, including Slotomania, House of Fun, Caesars Slots, and others, resulting in higher final charges due to undisclosed foreign currency conversion rates and related fees. The lawsuit seeks NIS 18,357 in personal damages to the petitioner and approximately NIS 28 million in damages to the tentative class or approximately USD $8.8 million, using the exchange rate of NIS 3.19: USD $1.00, which was the exchange rate in effect on December 31, 2025. A pre-trial hearing on the motion is scheduled for September 9, 2026. As these claims are in preliminary stages, the Company cannot estimate what impact, if any, they may have on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. The Company intends to defend these claims vigorously.

On January 5, 2026, Daniela Beninati filed a putative class action in the Federal Court of Australia (Victoria Registry) against the Company, alleging that certain of our social casino-themed games constitute unlawful interactive gambling services under the Australian Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (Cth), and that the Company engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and unconscionable conduct in violation of the Australian Consumer Law in connection with the marketing and monetization of such games. The complaint seeks, inter alia, declaratory and injunctive relief, restitution of amounts paid for in-game virtual currency by Australian-based users, damages, interest and costs. On March 26, 2026 the Company filed a motion to compel arbitration and stay the lawsuit. An interlocutory hearing has been scheduled for September 24, 2026. The matter is in its preliminary stages. Accordingly, the Company cannot estimate what impact, if any, it may have on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. The Company intends to defend this matter vigorously.

On March 6, 2026, Crystiauna McLallen filed a putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington against SuperPlay Ltd., relating to its games, including Dice Dreamsand Domino Dreams. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the games constitute unlawful gambling under Washington law and violate state consumer protection laws, and seeks, inter alia, injunctive relief and restitution on behalf of a class of Washington residents who made purchases in the games. Per agreement of the parties, Superplay Ltd.’s response to the complaint is due on June 22, 2026. The matter is in its preliminary stages. Accordingly, the Company cannot estimate what impact, if any, it may have on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. The Company intends to defend this matter vigorously.

On March 26, 2024, the Tel Aviv 3 Tax Office (the “ITA”) issued an assessment order (the “2017 Assessment Order”) to Playtika Ltd. for tax year 2017 alleging that Playtika Ltd. should have applied a higher tax rate to certain income and denying certain tax credits. The 2017 Assessment Order claimed that, as of March 26, 2024, Playtika Ltd. was obliged to pay additional taxes (including interest and CPI linkage) for tax year 2017 in the amount of approximately NIS 72.9 million. On April 14, 2024, Playtika Ltd. filed a notice of appeal in the Tel Aviv District Court challenging the 2017 Assessment Order. On May 15, 2024, the ITA filed its statement of assessment grounds, and on December 1, 2024, Playtika Ltd. filed its statement of appeal grounds. On June 12, 2025, the ITA issued an assessment order (the “2018 Assessment Order”) for tax year 2018 in which it repeated similar arguments to those raised in the 2017 Assessment Order and also disallowed certain aircraft-related business expenses. The 2018 Assessment Order claimed that, as of June 12, 2025, Playtika Ltd. was obliged to pay additional taxes (including interest and CPI linkage) for tax year 2018 in the amount of approximately NIS 85.8 million. On June 26, 2025, Playtika Ltd. filed a notice of appeal and a case was opened in the Tel Aviv District Court. On July 14, 2025, the ITA filed its statement of assessment grounds, and on September 29, 2025, Playtika Ltd. filed its statement of appeal grounds. On December 14, 2025, the cases relating to the 2017 Assessment Order and 2018 Assessment Order were consolidated and a preliminary hearing occurred. At the preliminary hearing, the Court determined that, in light of the expected imminent issuance of assessment orders for additional years, the deadlines for filing affidavits and the evidentiary hearing date for witness examinations would be set after the arguments are filed in connection with the additional assessment orders for tax years 2019-2021. In this hearing, the ITA informed the Court that it was rescinding its claims

-19- disallowing the aircraft-related business expenses. On December 11, 2025, the ITA issued an assessment order (the “2019-2021 Assessment Order”) to Playtika Ltd. for tax years 2019-2021. In that order, the ITA repeated similar arguments to those raised in the 2017 Assessment Order and the 2018 Assessment Order and also denied foreign tax credits in the amount of approximately NIS 19 million for tax years 2019-2021. In addition, in the 2019-2021 Assessment Order, the ITA alleged that the interest rate set for intercompany loans Playtika Ltd. provided should have been higher under transfer pricing principles. The ITA also claimed a “secondary adjustment” in the form of interest on a deemed debt balance in favor of Playtika Ltd., due to the additional deemed income owed to Playtika Ltd. per the ITA’s claims. The 2019-2021 Assessment Order claimed that, as of December 11, 2025, Playtika Ltd. was obliged to pay additional taxes (including interest and CPI linkage) for tax years 2019-2021 in the amount of approximately NIS 312.9 million. On December 31, 2025, Playtika Ltd.filed a notice of appeal regarding the 2019-2021 Assessment Order and a case was opened in the Tel Aviv District Court. On January 28, 2026, the ITA filed its statement of assessment grounds. Playtika Ltd.’s current deadline for filing its appeal arguments is June 21, 2026 (subject to extensions). On April 22, 2026, the court approved the consolidation of all of the cases relating to the assessment orders described above. The total amount of the assessments under the 2017 Assessment Order, the 2018 Assessment Order and the 2019-2021 Assessment Order was approximately USD $149 million as of the respective dates of the assessment orders, using the exchange rate of NIS 3.17: USD $1.00, which was the exchange rate in effect on March 31, 2026. This amount remains subject to continued accrual interest and linkage of the Israeli CPI until paid. The Company intends to pursue this case vigorously. See Note 12, Income Taxes, for additional information.

NOTE 9. REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

The following table provides information about disaggregated revenue by geographic location of the Company’s players and type of platform (in millions):

Revenues through third-party platforms and through the Company’s own direct-to-consumer platforms were as follows (in millions):

Contract balances

Payments from players for virtual items are collected by platform providers or payment processors and remitted to the Company (net of the platform or clearing fees) generally within 30 days after the player transaction. The Company’s right to receive the payments collected by the platform providers or payment processors is recorded as an accounts receivable as the right to receive payment is unconditional. Deferred revenues, which represent a contract liability, represent mostly unrecognized fees billed for virtual items which have not yet been consumed at the balance sheet date. Platform fees paid to platform providers or payment processors and associated with deferred revenues represent a contract asset.

-20-

Balances of the Company’s contract assets and liabilities are as follows (in millions):

(1)Contract assets are included within prepaid expenses and other current assets in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

(2)Contract liabilities are included within accrued expenses and other current liabilities as “deferred revenues” in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

During three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company recognized $22.4 million of its contract liabilities that were outstanding as of December 31, 2025.

Unsatisfied performance obligations

Substantially all of the Company’s unsatisfied performance obligations relate to contracts with an original expected length of one year or less.

NOTE 10. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company operates its business asone operating segment andone reportable segment. The Company has identified its Chief Executive Officer as its Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”). The CODM uses revenues and net income for purposes of assessing performance and deciding how to allocate resources. In addition to revenues and net income, the following significant expense categories and amounts are regularly provided to the CODM for use when allocating resources: interest expense (as disclosed in Note 11, Interest and Other, Net,)and advertising expense, which was $331.9 million and $224.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. Asset information as presented on the consolidated balance sheets is provided to the CODM.

The Company’s long-lived assets, net, by country of domicile are as follows (in millions):

-21-

NOTE 11. INTEREST AND OTHER, NET

Interest and other, net are as follows (in millions):

NOTE 12. INCOME TAXES

The effective tax rates were determined using a worldwide estimated annual effective tax rate and took discrete items into consideration. The difference between the effective tax rate and the 21% U.S. federal statutory rate for the three months ended March 31, 2026 was primarily due to changes in estimated value of contingent consideration and tax rates in foreign jurisdictions, partially offset by impacts of tax positions that do not meet the more likely than not standard. The difference between the effective tax rate and the 21% U.S. federal statutory rate for the three months ended March 31, 2025 was primarily due to the inclusion of Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income, tax rates in foreign jurisdictions, state income taxes, and changes in valuation allowances, partially offset by a favorable impact of tax positions that do not meet the more likely than not standard.

On March 31, 2026, the Israeli Knesset enacted Chapter J, the Law for the Encouragement and Incentivization of Research and Development (the “R&D Law”). The R&D Law introduces a refundable tax credit regime for qualifying research and development expenditures incurred in Israel. The R&D Law applies to qualifying R&D expenditures incurred beginning in the 2026 tax year and allows eligible companies, subject to meeting certain conditions, to offset Israeli income taxes or Israeli qualified domestic minimum top up tax (“QDMTT”), or alternatively to receive a government grant if the credit is not utilized. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, the impact of the R&D Law was immaterial to the Company's interim consolidated financial statements.

The Company accounts for refundable tax credits that are not subject to the scope of ASC 740 using a grant accounting model, by analogy to International Accounting Standards 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, and recognizes such grants when the Company has reasonable assurance that it will comply with the grant’s conditions and that the grant will be received. Refundable tax credits are accounted for by analogy to government grants, as the Company can realize the benefit regardless of whether or not it has an income tax liability. Therefore, these amounts are not considered income taxes and fall outside the scope of Topic 740, Income Tax. Refundable tax credits are recorded in the interim consolidated financial statements in accordance with their purpose, generally as a reduction of expenses, or a reduction of asset costs. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, tax credits were immaterial to the company's interim consolidated financial statements.

-22-

NOTE 13. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

The following tables show a summary of changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, by component for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 (in millions):

The amounts in the summary of changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) tables, above, are net of tax expense/(benefits) as follows (in millions):

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income for interest rate swaps and foreign currency derivative contracts were reclassified to interest expense and operating expenses, respectively, in the Company’s consolidated statements of comprehensive income during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025.

-23-

NOTE 14. NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share attributable to common stockholders (in millions, except per share data):

The Company uses the treasury stock method on a grant-by-grant basis as the method for determining the dilutive effect of options, RSUs and PSUs. Under this method, it is assumed that the hypothetical proceeds received upon settlement are used to repurchase common shares at the average market price during the period. The following outstanding employee equity awards were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented (in millions):

In addition,6.2 million and 10.3 million PSUs were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income per share for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, because the minimum performance measures were not yet met.

NOTE 15. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In late April 2026, the Company paid its first contingent consideration payment to the shareholders of SuperPlay in the amount of $461 million.

The Company performed a review for subsequent events through the date of these financial statements. No other material items were noted for disclosure.

-24-