Hillman Solutions Corp.

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Hillman Solutions Corp.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hillman Solutions Corp. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 27, 2025 and December 28, 2024, the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss), cash flows, and stockholders' equity, for each of the three years in the period ended December 27, 2025, and the related notes and the financial statement schedule II - Valuation Accounts (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 27, 2025 and December 28, 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 27, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 27, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 17, 2026, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Goodwill – Hardware Solutions Reporting Unit – Refer to Note 2 to the Financial Statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company’s evaluation of goodwill for impairment involves the comparison of the fair value of each reporting unit to their respective carrying values.

The Company used both a discounted cash flow model and a guideline public company method to estimate the fair value of the Hardware Solutions (“HS”) reporting unit. The discounted cash flow model requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions including projected net sales and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”) growth rates and the discount rate. The guideline public company method requires the use of market price data of guideline public companies to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on either the fair value of the reporting unit, the amount of any goodwill impairment charge, or both. The Company’s consolidated goodwill balance was $830.7 million as of December 27, 2025, of which $450.9 million was allocated to the HS reporting unit. The estimated fair value of the HS reporting unit exceeded its carrying value as of the measurement date and, therefore, no impairment was recognized.

We identified the Company’s valuation of goodwill for the HS reporting unit as a critical audit matter because of the significant judgments made by management to estimate the fair value of this reporting unit. This required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists, when performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of certain of management’s estimates and assumptions, particularly related to projected net sales and EBITDA growth rates as well as the selection of the discount rate.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the estimates of projected net sales and EBITDA growth rates and the selection of the discount rate used by management to estimate the fair value of the HS reporting unit included the following, among others:

•We tested the effectiveness of controls over management’s goodwill impairment evaluation, including those over the determination of the fair value of the Hardware Solutions reporting unit, such as controls related to management’s forecasts of projected net sales and EBITDA growth rates and selection of the discount rate.

•We evaluated management’s ability to accurately forecast projected net sales and EBITDA growth rates by comparing actual results to management’s historical forecasts.

•We performed a sensitivity analysis of the projected net sales and EBITDA growth rates and selected discount rate, which included their impact on cash flows.

•We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s projected net sales and EBITDA growth rates by comparing the forecasts to (1) historical net sales and EBITDA growth rates, (2) underlying analysis detailing business strategies and growth plans, (3) internal communications to management and the Board of Directors, and (4) industry reports for the Company and certain of its peer companies.

•With the assistance of our internal fair value specialists, we evaluated the reasonableness of the valuation methodologies utilized, along with the discount rate and long-term net sales growth rate selected by:

◦Testing the source information underlying the determination of the discount rate and long-term net sales growth rate, including the mathematical accuracy of the calculation.

◦Developing a range of independent estimates for the discount rate and compared it to the rate selected by management.

◦Utilizing industry and market-specific growth trends to assess the reasonableness of the long-term net sales growth rate selected by management.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Cincinnati, Ohio

February 17, 2026

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2022.