Sotera Health Co

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

Consolidated Statements of Equity

(in thousands)

(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

Principles of Consolidation – Sotera Health Company (also referred to herein as the “Company,” “we,” “our,” “us” or “its”), is a leading global provider of mission-critical end-to-end sterilization solutions, lab testing and advisory services for the healthcare industry with operations primarily in the Americas, Europe and Asia.

We operate and report inthree segments: Sterigenics, Nordion and Nelson Labs. We describe our reportable segments in Note 15, “Segment Information”. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates – In preparing our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), we make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and the accompanying notes. We regularly evaluate the estimates and assumptions used and revise them as new information becomes available. Actual results may vary from those estimates.

Interim Financial Statements– The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities, operating results, and cash flows of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. These financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP for interim financial information and the instructions to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's annual consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in our 2025 10-K.

2. Recent Accounting Standards

ASUs Issued But Not Yet Adopted

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03-Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. The amendments in this ASU require entities to disaggregate certain expense captions into specified categories in disclosures within the footnotes to the financial statements. In January 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-01, which revises the effective date of ASU 2024-03 and clarifies that entities are required to adopt the guidance in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company expects that this ASU will increase disclosures in the annual and interim periods when adopted.

3. Revenue Recognition

The following table shows disaggregated net revenues from contracts with external customers by timing of revenue and by segment for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:

When we receive consideration from a customer prior to transferring goods or services under the terms of a sales contract, we record deferred revenue, which represents a contract liability. Deferred revenue totaled $13.7 million and $18.0 million at March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. We recognize deferred revenue after we have transferred control of the goods or services to the customer and all revenue recognition criteria are met.

4. Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following:

5. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following:

6. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Changes to goodwill during the three months ended March 31, 2026 were as follows:

Other intangible assets consisted of the following:

(a)Includes certain transportation certifications, a class 1B nuclear license and other intangible assets related to obtaining such licensure. These assets are considered indefinite-lived as the decision for renewal by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (“CNSC”) is highly based on a licensee’s previous assessments, reported incidents, and annual compliance and inspection results. New applications for a license can take a significant amount of time and cost; whereas an existing licensee with a historical record of compliance and current operating conditions is generally expected to obtain renewal, as Nordion has demonstrated over its 75 years of history. In September 2025, the CNSC renewed Nordion’s Class 1B nuclear license for a 25-year term.

Amounts include the impact of foreign currency translation. Fully amortized amounts are written off.

Amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets was $5.6 million and $18.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. $3.0 million and $15.3 million was included in “Amortization of intangible assets” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, whereas the remainder was included in “Cost of revenues.”

The estimated aggregate amortization expense for finite-lived intangible assets for each of the next five years and thereafter is as follows:

7. Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following:

8. Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consisted of the following:

Debt Facilities

Under the debt agreements summarized below, at March 31, 2026 we and Sotera Health Holdings, LLC (“SHH”), our wholly owned subsidiary, had debt payment obligations under (a) a term loan in the amount of $1,415.9 million, (b) a revolving credit facility, which supported operationally-related letters of credit but was otherwise undrawn, and which provides to us capacity up to $600.0 million for future potential borrowings, and (c) $750.0 million of senior secured notes. Our debt agreements also include additional covenants, conditions and rights to request additional debt, as summarized below.

Senior Secured Credit Facilities and Indenture

On December 13, 2019, SHH entered into senior secured first lien credit facilities (the “Senior Secured Credit Facilities”), consisting of both a prepayable senior secured first lien term loan (the “Term Loans”) and a senior secured first lien revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) pursuant to a first lien credit agreement (as amended through Amendment No. 6, the “Credit Agreement”). The Senior Secured Credit Facilities also provide SHH the right at any time and under certain conditions to request incremental term loans or incremental revolving credit commitments based on a formula defined in the Senior Secured Credit Facilities.

The weighted average interest rates on borrowings under the Term Loans for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025 was 6.23% and 7.65%, respectively.

On May 30, 2024, SHH, the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company (the “Guarantors”), and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee, paying agent, registrar, transfer agent and notes collateral agent, entered into an Indenture (the “Indenture”) governing SHH’s $750.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.375% senior secured notes due 2031 (the “Secured Notes”) issued in May 2024. The Secured Notes pay interest semiannually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year, which began on December 1, 2024, at a rate of 7.375% per year, and will mature on June 1, 2031.

Outstanding letters of credit are collateralized by encumbrances against the Revolving Credit Facility and the collateral pledged thereunder, or by cash placed on deposit with the issuing bank. As of March 31, 2026, the Company had$8.3 million of letters of credit issued against the Revolving Credit Facility, resulting in total availability under the Revolving Credit Facility of$591.7 million.

9. Income Taxes

Income tax expense (benefit) is provided on an interim basis based upon our estimate of the annual effective income tax rate. In determining the estimated annual effective income tax rate, we analyze various factors, including projections of our annual earnings and the taxing jurisdictions where the earnings will occur, the impact of state and local taxes, our ability to utilize tax credits and net operating loss carryforwards and available tax planning alternatives. Our effective tax rate was 37.6% and 10.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and March 31, 2025, respectively.

Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2026 differed from the statutory rate primarily due to the foreign rate differential, current year permanent differences, including foreign withholding taxes and other non-deductible items, and U.S. state income taxes (net of federal tax benefit). Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2025 differed from the statutory rate primarily due to current year permanent differences, partially offset by the valuation allowance attributable to the limitation on the deductibility of interest expense and the impact of the foreign rate differential.

10. Employee Benefits

The Company sponsors various post-employment benefit plans including, in certain countries outside the U.S., defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans, retirement compensation arrangements, and plans that provide extended health care coverage to retired employees, the majority of which relate to Nordion. The interest cost, expected return on plan assets and amortization of net actuarial gain are recorded in “Other income, net” and the service cost component is included in the same financial statement line item as the applicable employee’s wages in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.

Defined benefit pension plan

The following defined benefit pension plan disclosure relates to Nordion. Certain immaterial foreign defined benefit pension plans have been excluded from the table below. The components of net periodic pension benefit for the defined benefit plans for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:

Other benefit plans

Other benefit plans disclosed below relate to Nordion and include a supplemental retirement arrangement, a retirement and termination allowance, and post-retirement benefit plans, which include contributory health and dental care benefits and contributory life insurance coverage. Certain immaterial other foreign benefit plans have been excluded from the table below. All non-pension post-employment benefit plans are unfunded. The components of net periodic pension cost for the other benefit plans for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:

11. Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are presented net of the related tax. Foreign currency translation is not adjusted for income taxes.

Changes in our accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) balances, net of applicable tax, were as follows:

(a)For defined benefit pension plans, amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are recorded to “Other income, net” within the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.

(b)For interest rate derivatives, amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are recorded to “Interest expense, net” within the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.

12. Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings per share represents the amount of income attributable to each common share outstanding. Diluted earnings per share represents the amount of income attributable to each common share outstanding adjusted for the effects of potentially dilutive common shares. Potentially dilutive common shares include stock options and other stock-based awards. In the periods where the effect would be antidilutive, potentially dilutive common shares are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share.

For 2025 and prior years, in periods in which the Company had net income, earnings per share was calculated using the two-class method. This method was required as unvested pre-IPO restricted stock awards had the right to receive non-forfeitable dividends or dividend equivalents if the Company were to declare dividends on its common stock. Pursuant to the two-class method, earnings for each period were allocated on a pro-rata basis to common stockholders and unvested pre-IPO restricted stock awards. Diluted earnings per share was computed using the more dilutive of the (a) two-class method, and (b) treasury stock method, as applicable, to the potentially dilutive instruments.

In periods in which the Company had a net loss, the two-class method was not applicable because the unvested pre-IPO restricted stock awards did not participate in losses.

Beginning in 2026, earnings per share is calculated using the treasury stock method. As all pre-IPO restricted stock awards were fully vested in the third quarter of 2025, the use of the two-class method is no longer required. Diluted earnings per share represents the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of potential common shares calculated using the treasury stock method.

Our basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share are calculated as follows:

(a)As the Company reported a net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2025, the calculation of diluted weighted average common shares outstanding is not applicable because the effect of including the potential common shares would be anti-dilutive.

Diluted earnings (loss) per share does not consider the following potential common shares as the effect would be anti-dilutive:

13. Commitments and Contingencies

From time to time, we may be or are subject to various lawsuits and other claims, as well as gain contingencies, in the ordinary course of our business. In addition, from time to time, we receive communications from government or regulatory agencies concerning investigations or allegations of noncompliance with laws or regulations in jurisdictions in which we operate. We assess these regulatory and legal actions to determine if a contingent liability should be recorded. In making these determinations, we may, depending on the nature of the matter, consult with internal and external legal counsel and technical experts.

We establish reserves for specific liabilities in connection with regulatory and legal actions that we determine to be both probable and reasonably estimable. The outcomes of regulatory and legal actions can be difficult to predict and are often resolved over long periods of time, making our probability and estimability determinations highly judgmental. Probability determinations require the analysis of various possible outcomes, assessments of potential damages and the impact of multiple factors beyond our control, including potential actions by others, interpretations of the law, and changes and developments in relevant facts, circumstances, regulations and other laws. If a potentially material loss contingency is not probable, but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability is disclosed, together with an estimate of the range of possible loss if the range is determinable and material. In certain of the matters described below, we are not able to estimate potential liability because of the uncertainties related to the outcome(s) and/or the amount(s) or range(s) of loss. The ultimate resolution of pending regulatory and legal matters in future periods, including the matters described below, may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and/or liquidity. The Company may also incur material defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other adverse effects on our business, financial condition, and/or results of operations.

The information regarding those matters set forth below is as of March 31, 2026, except as otherwise indicated.

Ethylene Oxide Tort Litigation

Sterigenics U.S., LLC (“Sterigenics”) and other medical supply sterilization companies have been subjected to tort lawsuits alleging various injuries caused by low-level environmental exposure to EO used at or emitted or released from sterilization facilities. Those lawsuits, as detailed further below, are individual claims, as opposed to class actions.

California

As of April 30, 2026, subsidiaries of the Company and other parties are defendants in lawsuits pending in Los Angeles County Superior Court in which the plaintiffs assert approximately 140 claims for personal injury or wrongful death allegedly resulting from use, emissions and releases of EO from Sterigenics’ Vernon facilities (the “Vernon Cases”). The Vernon Cases have been assigned to one judge, with initial trials scheduled for January and April 2027. Eight individual claims have been selected as the “First Plaintiff Group” and are being prioritized for discovery.

Georgia

Subsidiaries of the Company and other parties are defendants in lawsuits in Georgia in which plaintiffs allege personal injuries, wrongful death and property devaluation resulting from use, emissions and releases of EO from or at Sterigenics’ Atlanta facility.

As of April 30, 2026, approximately 470 personal injury and wrongful death claims filed in the State Court of Cobb County (the “Georgia Trial Court”) are assigned to a single judge (the “Georgia Personal Injury Cases”). The Georgia Personal Injury Cases are governed by case management orders pursuant to which general causation issues in a pool ofeight cases were to be adjudicated in Phase 1 and specific causation issues in those pool cases were to be adjudicated in Phase 2; the remaining Georgia Personal Injury Cases, including 15 cases that include both personal injury and property claims andone personal injury lawsuit that is pending before a different judge, are stayed.

On November 22, 2024, the Georgia Trial Court issued a Phase 1 ruling on general causation issues granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motions to exclude certain Phase 1 expert testimony and defendants’ motions for summary judgment on Phase 1 issues (the “First General Causation Ruling”). Plaintiffs and defendants appealed the First General Causation Ruling to the Court of Appeals of Georgia (the “Phase 1 General Causation Appeals”). While the Phase 1 General Causation Appeals were pending, three of the pool cases, selected by plaintiffs’ counsel, proceeded to Phase 2 (the “Phase 2 Cases”). On October 17, 2025, the Georgia Trial Court issued its Phase 2 rulings on specific causation issues granting Sterigenics’ motions to exclude three of plaintiffs’ specific causation expert witnesses and granting Sterigenics’ motions for summary judgment in allthree Phase 2 Cases (the “Specific Causation Ruling”). On October 28, 2025, the Georgia Trial Court entered an order also adopting its Specific Causation Ruling with respect to our subsidiary Sotera Health LLC. Plaintiffs in the Phase 2 Cases appealed the Specific Causation Ruling to the Court of Appeals of Georgia (the “Phase 2 Specific Causation Appeals”).

On October 31, 2025, the Court of Appeals of Georgia ruled on the Phase 1 General Causation Appeals, finding that as Sterigenics contended on appeal, the First General Causation Ruling failed to apply the proper standard for determining the admissibility of expert testimony on general causation, vacating the First General Causation Ruling and remanding the pool cases to the Georgia Trial Court with instructions to apply the proper standard in ruling on general causation issues. The Court of Appeals also instructed the Georgia Trial Court to consider whether plaintiffs can prove general causation through epidemiological evidence and background risks of the diseases at issue. On March 30, 2026, the Georgia Trial Court granted defendants’ motions to exclude plaintiffs’ general causation experts and entered summary judgment for defendants in thefive remanded pool cases (the “Second General Causation Ruling and Judgment”). Plaintiffs in thefive remanded pool cases appealed the Second General Causation Ruling and Judgment to the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Subsidiaries of the Company and other parties are also defendants in a lawsuit filed in May 2020 in which employees of a sterilization customer of Sterigenics allege they were injured while working at the customer’s distribution facility by exposure to residual EO allegedly emanating from products of the customer that had been sterilized by Sterigenics. The case is proceeding in the Superior Court of Cobb County on plaintiffs’ Fifth Amended Complaint. Pursuant to the customer’s contract with Sterigenics, the customer is indemnifying Sterigenics against this lawsuit.

As of April 30, 2026, approximately 305 lawsuits have been filed in the Georgia Trial Court against subsidiaries of the Company and other parties in which plaintiffs allege property devaluation resulting from use, emissions and releases of EO from or at Sterigenics’ Atlanta facility. These cases have been consolidated for pretrial purposes (the “Consolidated Property Cases”). Proceedings in a pool ofnine of the Consolidated Property Cases are governed by case management orders pursuant to which the parties completed discovery and defendants filed motions to exclude certain plaintiffs’ expert testimony and motions for summary judgment, which remain pending. The remaining cases are stayed.

Illinois

Lawsuits against subsidiaries of the Company and other parties have been filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, by plaintiffs alleging personal injury or wrongful death resulting from use, emissions and releases of EO from Sterigenics’ former Willowbrook facility (the “Illinois Cases”). As of April 30, 2026, subsidiaries of the Company and other parties are defendants in approximately 10 Illinois Cases that are in various stages of pleadings, motions practice and fact discovery.

New Mexico

The Company and certain subsidiaries are defendants in a lawsuit filed in the Third Judicial District Court, Doña Ana County, New Mexico (the “Trial Court”) in which the New Mexico Attorney General (“NMAG”) alleges that use, emissions and releases of EO from Sterigenics’ facility in Santa Teresa have deteriorated the air quality in surrounding communities and materially contributed to increased health risks for residents of those communities and seeks declaratory and permanent injunctive relief and damages. In April 2024, the Court of Appeals of the State of New Mexico denied the NMAG’s petition for leave to file an interlocutory appeal of the Trial Court’s August 2023 order granting Sterigenics’ motion for summary judgment on strict liability, the Unfair Practices Act claim, and the claims for decreased property values, increased healthcare costs and medical monitoring costs, and remanded the case to the District Court of Doña Ana County for further proceedings on the remaining claims. In January 2026, the Trial Court denied NMAG’s May 2025 motion to modify the Trial Court’s August 2023 summary judgment order to reinstate the NMAG’s claim for recovery of healthcare cost damages. The case is set for trial in July 2026.

Additional EO lawsuits have been threatened relating to Sterigenics’ current and former EO sterilization facilities in the United States and may be filed in the future. These threats of additional EO lawsuits are comparable to threats that have similarly been made against other companies within our industry. Based on our view of the strength of the science and related evidence that emissions of EO from Sterigenics’ operations have not caused and could not have caused the harms alleged in such lawsuits, we believe that losses in the remaining or future EO cases through trials and any appeals that may prove necessary are not probable. Although the Company is vigorously defending against the EO tort claims, future settlements of EO tort claims are reasonably possible. The previously disclosed settlements of certain cases related to our facilities in Willowbrook and Atlanta were driven by dynamics unique to the claims that were settled and thus should not give rise to presumptions that the Company will settle additional EO tort claims and/or that any such settlements will be for comparable amounts.

Potential trial and settlement outcomes can vary widely based on a host of factors. EO tort lawsuits will be presided over by different judges, tried by different counsel presenting different evidence and decided by different juries. The substantive and procedural laws of jurisdictions vary and can meaningfully impact the litigation process and outcome of a case. Each plaintiff’s claim involves unique facts and evidence, including the circumstances of the plaintiff’s alleged exposure, the type and severity of the plaintiff’s disease, the plaintiff’s medical history and course of treatment, the location of and other factors related to the plaintiff’s real property, and other circumstances. The outcomes of trials before juries are rarely certain and a judgment rendered or settlement reached inone case is not necessarily representative of potential outcomes of other seemingly comparable cases. As a result, it is not possible to estimate a reasonably possible loss or range of loss with respect to any future EO tort lawsuit, trial or settlement. We are vigorously defending the EO tort lawsuits.

Insurance Coverage for Environmental Liabilities

An environmental liability insurance policy under which we received coverage for certain of the EO tort lawsuits described above has been exhausted. We sought to obtain additional insurance coverage for these tort claims; however, our existing insurance policies exclude coverage for EO tort lawsuits, and we may not be able to secure additional coverage for these matters in the future. On August 27, 2021, Sterigenics filed an insurance coverage lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (the “Illinois District Court”) relating to two commercial general liability policies issued in the

1980s (the “Northern District of Illinois Coverage Lawsuit”). The Illinois District Court issued an order declaring that the defendant insurer owes a duty to Sterigenics and another insured party to defend the Illinois Cases (the “Duty to Defend Order”) and entered judgment for Sterigenics for certain defense costs incurred in the Illinois Cases. The defendant insurer appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. On January 23, 2026, the Illinois Supreme Court issued an opinion on a question of Illinois law certified to it by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, holding that a permit or regulation authorizing emissions plays no role in assessing the application of a pollution exclusion in a standard form commercial general liability policy. On March 13, 2026, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the Duty to Defend Order and remanded the case to the Illinois District Court which then entered judgment in favor of the defendant insurer. In light of the rulings by the Illinois Supreme Court and Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, Sterigenics has agreed to withdraw claims for EO tort lawsuit coverage under other historical commercial general liability policies. Coverage lawsuits filed in the Delaware Superior Court, the Los Angeles County Superior Court and the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois relating to those claims will be dismissed. If other historical insurance coverage for EO tort lawsuits is identified, coverage claims may be pursued, but it is not possible to predict how much coverage, if any, could ultimately be recovered.

Sotera Health Company Securities Litigation and Related Matters

In January 2023, a stockholder class action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (the “Ohio District Court”) against the Company and certain past and present directors and senior executives, the Company’s private equity stockholders and the underwriters of the Company’s IPO in November 2020 and the Company’s secondary public offering (“SPO”) in March 2021 on behalf of a proposed class of stockholders who acquired shares of the Company between November 20, 2020 and September 19, 2022 (the “Michigan Funds Litigation”). Plaintiffs sought damages for alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Exchange Act in certain statements made in connection with the Company’s IPO and March 2021 SPO regarding the safety of the Company’s use of EO and/or the EO tort lawsuits and other risks of its EO operations. On March 19, 2025, the Ohio District Court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss and entered judgment dismissing the Michigan Funds Litigation with prejudice (the “Dismissal Order and Judgment”). Plaintiffs appealed, and on February 24, 2026, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the Dismissal Order and Judgment.

In May 2024, a stockholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (the “Delaware Chancery Court”) for the benefit of the Company as the nominal defendant (the “May 2024 Derivative Litigation”). The plaintiffs alleged breaches of fiduciary duties, insider trading, unjust enrichment and other violations by certain past and present directors and senior executives of the Company and the Company’s private equity stockholders, and sought damages sustained by the Company and other forms of relief including restitution, rescission and disgorgement. The May 2024 Derivative Litigation was stayed pending a ruling on the merits in the Michigan Funds Litigation. Following the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit’s affirmance of the District Court’s Dismissal Order and Judgment, the plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. On March 31, 2026, the Delaware Chancery Court dismissed the May 2024 Derivative Litigation.

The Company also received demands pursuant to 8 Del. C. §220 for inspections of its books and records (“220 Demands”) from shareholders purporting to investigate potential wrongdoing by Company fiduciaries and other issues relating to the Company’s statements regarding the safety of its use of EO and/or the EO tort lawsuits and other risks of its EO operations. The Company produced documents in response to the 220 Demands, and all of the shareholders have since indicated that they have completed their investigations.

14. Financial Instruments and Financial Risk

Derivative Instruments

We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and are not a party to leveraged derivatives.

Derivatives Designated in Hedge Relationships

From time to time, the Company utilizes interest rate derivatives designated in hedge relationships to manage interest rate risk associated with our variable rate borrowings. These instruments are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recorded as a component of “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In March 2025, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $400.0 million. The interest rate swap was effective on August 31, 2025 and expires on August 31, 2027. We receive interest at the one-month Term SOFR rate and pay a fixed interest rate under the terms of the swap agreement. In March 2023, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $400.0 million. The interest rate swap was effective on August 23, 2023 and expired on August 23, 2025. We received interest at the one-month Term SOFR rate and paid a fixed interest rate under the terms of the swap agreement.

We designated both interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges designed to hedge the variability of cash flows attributable to changes in the SOFR benchmark interest rate of our Term Loan (or any successor thereto).

Derivatives Not Designated in Hedge Relationships

The Company also enters into foreign currency forward contracts to manage foreign currency exchange rate risk of our intercompany loans in certain of our international subsidiaries and non-functional currency assets and liabilities. The foreign currency forward contracts expire on a monthly basis. These foreign currency derivatives are not designated in hedge relationships.

Embedded Derivatives

We have embedded derivatives in certain of our customer and supply contracts as a result of the currency of the contract being different from the functional currency of the parties involved. Changes in the fair value of the embedded derivatives are recognized in “Other income, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.

The following table provides a summary of the notional and fair values of our derivative instruments:

(a)Represents the total notional amounts for certain of the Company’s supply and sales contracts accounted for as embedded derivatives.

Embedded derivatives assets/liabilities and foreign currency forward contracts are included in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” and “Accrued Liabilities” on our Consolidated Balance Sheets depending upon their position at period end. Interest rate swaps are included in “Other assets” and “Noncurrent liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets depending upon their position at period end.

The following table summarizes the activities of our derivative instruments for the periods presented, and the line item they are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income:

(a)For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, amounts represent settlement payments on interest rate swaps.

Credit Risk

Certain of our financial assets, including cash and cash equivalents, are exposed to credit risk.

We are also exposed, in our normal course of business, to credit risk from our customers. As of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, accounts receivable was net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts of $2.6 million and $3.0 million, respectively.

Credit risk on financial instruments arises from the potential for counterparties to default on their contractual obligations to us. We are exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance, but do not anticipate non-performance by any of the counterparties to our financial instruments. We limit our credit risk by dealing with counterparties that are considered to be of high credit quality. In the event of non-performance by counterparties, the carrying value of our financial instruments represents the maximum amount of loss that would be incurred.

Our credit team evaluates and regularly monitors changes in the credit risk of our customers. We routinely assess the collectability of accounts receivable and maintain an adequate allowance for uncollectible accounts to address potential credit losses. The process includes a review of customer financial information and credit ratings, current market conditions as well as the expected future economic conditions that may impact the collection of trade receivables. We regularly review our customers’ past due amounts through an analysis of aged accounts receivables, specific customer past due aging amounts, and the history of trade receivables written off. Upon concluding that a receivable balance is not collectible, the balance is written off against the allowance for uncollectible accounts.

Fair Value Hierarchy

The fair value of our financial instruments is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The valuation techniques we would use to determine such fair values are described as follows: Level 1—fair values determined by inputs utilizing quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2—fair values based on observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable; Level 3—fair values determined by unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other market participants.

The following table discloses the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities:

(a)Derivatives designated as hedging instruments are measured at fair value with changes in fair value recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Interest rate swaps are valued using pricing models that incorporate observable market inputs including interest rate curves and yield curves.

(b)Derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments are measured at fair value with gains or losses recognized immediately in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. Embedded derivatives are valued using internally developed models that rely on observable market inputs, including foreign currency forward curves. Foreign currency forward contracts are valued by reference to changes in foreign currency exchange rate over the life of the contract.

(c)Carrying amounts of current portion of long-term debt and long-term debt instruments are reported net of discounts and debt issuance costs. The estimated fair value of these instruments are based upon quoted prices for the Term Loan and the Secured Notes in inactive markets as provided by an independent fixed income security pricing service.

(d)Fair value approximates carrying value.

15. Segment Information

We identify our operating segments based on the way we manage, evaluate and internally report our business activities for purposes of allocating resources and assessing performance. We have three reportable segments: Sterigenics, Nordion and Nelson Labs. We have determined our reportable segments based upon an assessment of organizational structure, service types, and internally prepared financial statements. Our chief operating decision maker, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Sotera Health Company (“CODM”), evaluates performance and allocates resources based on net revenues and segment income after the elimination of intercompany activities. The CODM uses these performance measures to inform decisions about the operations of the business and dedication of resources to selling and general administrative matters pertinent to the Company. The accounting policies of our reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 1, “Significant Accounting Policies,” of the Company's annual consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in our 2025 10-K.

Sterigenics

Sterigenics provides outsourced terminal sterilization and irradiation services for the medical device, pharmaceutical, food safety and advanced applications markets using three major technologies: gamma irradiation, EO processing and E-beam irradiation.

Nordion

Nordion is a leading global provider of Co-60 used in the sterilization and irradiation processes for the medical device, pharmaceutical, food safety, and high-performance materials industries, as well as in the treatment of cancer. In addition, Nordion is a leading global provider of gamma irradiation systems.

Nelson Labs

Nelson Labs provides outsourced microbiological and analytical chemistry testing and advisory services for the medical device and pharmaceutical industries.

(a)Revenues are reported net of intersegment sales. Our Nordion segment recognized $19.2 million and $9.8 million in revenues from sales to our Sterigenics segment for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, that is not reflected in net revenues in the table above. Intersegment sales for Sterigenics and Nelson Labs are immaterial for all periods presented.

(b)Segment expenses are comprised of direct materials, labor, utilities, other costs of revenues, SG&A, and other non-operating expenses (income) attributable to each segment.

(c)Corporate expenses that are directly incurred by a segment are reflected in each segment’s income. The remaining Corporate expenses for executive management, accounting, information technology, legal, human resources, treasury, investor relations, corporate development, tax, purchasing, and marketing not directly incurred by a segment are allocated to the segments primarily based on total net revenue.

Capital expenditures by segment for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 were as follows:

Total assets and depreciation and amortization expense by segment are not readily available and are not reported separately to the CODM.

A reconciliation of segment income to consolidated income (loss) before income taxes is as follows:

(a)Includes depreciation of Co-60 held at gamma irradiation sites and excludes accelerated depreciation associated with business optimization activities.

(b)Represents share-based compensation expense to employees and Non-Employee Directors.

(c)Represents the effects of (i) fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and (ii) non-cash mark-to-fair value of embedded derivatives relating to certain customer and supply contracts at Nordion.

(d)Represents (i) certain costs related to divestitures, acquisitions and the integration of acquisitions, (ii) professional fees and other costs associated with business optimization, cost saving and other process enhancement projects, and (iii) legal, consulting, and other fees associated with secondary offerings and shareholder engagement.

(e)Represents litigation and other professional fees associated with our EO sterilization facilities.

(f)Represents the cost to settle 97 pending and threatened EO claims against Sterigenics in Illinois pursuant to the term sheet entered into on April 3, 2025.

(g)Represents non-cash accretion of ARO related to Co-60 gamma and EO processing facilities, which are based on estimated site remediation costs for any future decommissioning of these facilities and are accreted over the life of the asset.