SoFi Technologies, Inc.

Three months. The provision for credit losses was $13.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, reflecting net charge-offs of $9.2 million and an allowance increase of $4.5 million. Net charge-offs of $9.2 million increased $2.7 million compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025, driven by higher average credit card balances. The allowance increase of $4.5 million primarily reflected growth in the credit card portfolio balances, partially offset by continued strength in credit quality of the portfolio.

The prior year provision for the three months ended June 30, 2025 was $10.0 million, reflecting net charge-offs of $6.6 million and an allowance increase of $3.5 million.

Six Months. The provision for credit losses was $22.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026, reflecting net charge-offs of $17.1 million and an allowance increase of $5.5 million. Net charge-offs of $17.1 million increased $2.6 million compared to the six months ended June 30, 2025, driven by higher average credit card balances. The allowance increase of $5.5 million primarily reflected growth in the credit card portfolio balances, partially offset by continued strength in credit quality of the portfolio.

The prior year provision for the six months ended June 30, 2025 was $15.7 million, reflecting net charge-offs of $14.6 million and an allowance increase of $1.2 million.

Refer to “Analysis of Charge-offs” for a further discussion of the factors driving changes in net charge-offs and the allowance.

Analysis of Allowance for Credit Losses

Allowance for Credit Losses Ratios

The following table presents the ratio of allowance for credit losses to total loans outstanding that are measured at amortized cost:

(1)Total loans outstanding excludes accrued interest.

(2)The increase in the ratio was primarily attributable to a decrease of $272.9 million in secured loans.

We omitted the credit ratios associated with nonaccrual loans, as the balance of nonaccrual loans was immaterial.

Allocation of Allowance for Credit Losses

The following table presents the allocation of the allowance for credit losses and the percentage of loans outstanding by category to total loans outstanding that are measured at amortized cost:

(1)Loans outstanding balances used in the calculation exclude accrued interest.

(2)Secured loans are term loan arrangements secured by underlying loans (collateral) owned by the debtor. The underlying loans were previously originated by us and were subject to our underwriting process and risk models, prior to being sold to the debtor and in most instances these loans continue to be serviced by us. We evaluate the credit quality of our secured loan portfolio relative to the fair value of the underlying collateral, reassessing it quarterly based on relevant information, including funded loan rates and historical loss experience. An allowance for credit losses is required when there is an expected credit loss after considering the fair value of the collateral as well as any anticipated future changes in the underlying collateral. As of June 30, 2026, based on this evaluation we did not recognize an allowance for credit losses on our secured loans.

Analysis of Charge-offs

The following tables present information regarding average loans outstanding, net charge-offs and the annualized ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding:

(1)Average balances were calculated on daily carrying balances.

(2)Net charge-offs include both credit- and certain non-credit-related charge-offs. Non-credit related charge-offs, which primarily relate to alleged or potential fraud, occur occasionally in our business and are impacted by factors different from our credit related charge-offs. Non-credit related charge-offs were immaterial for all periods presented.

(3)Net charge-offs related to personal, student and home loans are generally recorded innoninterest income—loan origination, sales, securitizations and servicing as part of the respective loans total change in fair value. Net charge-offs related to credit card and commercial and consumer banking are considered as part of theallowance for credit losses andprovision for credit losses.

(4)Excludes the impact of delinquent personal loan sales during the quarter. These loans were sold prior to charge-off during each respective quarter and otherwise would have been charged off as of the quarter-end consistent with our policy. See Note 4. Loans to the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

(5)Net charge-off ratio is calculated as net charge-offs divided by average loans.

For the three months ended June 30, 2026, the total net charge-off ratio was 1.81%, a decrease of 31 bps compared with the three months ended June 30, 2025, and total net charge-offs were $204.5 million, an increase of $44.2 million over the comparable period. The decrease in the total net charge-off ratio was primarily due a lower student loan charge-off ratio primarily driven by the repurchase of seasoned loans during 2025 that had a higher charge-off rate as well as higher average student loan balances. Additionally, a lower personal loan charge-off ratio contributed to the decrease, reflecting higher average personal loan balances and steady delinquency rates compared to the year ago period (total personal loan delinquency rate was 40 bps, down approximately 2 bps from the comparative period).

The increase in total net charge-offs was $44.2 million, driven by higher personal loan net charge-offs of $41.0 million primarily reflecting an increase in average loans.

For the six months ended June 30, 2026, the total net charge-off ratio was 1.91%, a decrease of 33 bps compared with the six months ended June 30, 2025, and total net charge-offs were $406.1 million, an increase of $77.2 million over the comparable period. The decrease in the total net charge-off ratio was primarily due a lower credit card net charge-off ratio reflective of higher average credit card loan balances. Additionally, a lower personal loan charge-off ratio contributed to the decrease, reflecting higher average personal loan balances and steady delinquency rates compared to the year ago period (total personal loan delinquency rate was 40 bps, down approximately 2 bps from the comparative period). The student loan charge-off ratio also decreased primarily driven by the repurchase of seasoned loans during 2025 that had a higher charge-off rate as well as higher average student loan balances.

The increase in total net charge-offs was $77.2 million, driven by higher personal loan net charge-offs of $61.8 million and student loan net charge-offs of $12.8 million, primarily reflecting an increase in average loans.