Skillz Inc.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The supplementary financial information required by this Item 8 is included in Item 7.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Skillz Inc.

Opinion on the financial statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Skillz Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”), and our report dated November 6, 2025 expressed an adverse opinion.

Change in accounting principle

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has adopted new accounting guidance in 2024 related to the disclosure of segment information in accordance with Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280). The adoption was retrospectively applied to 2023.

Basis for opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical audit matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Classification of end-user incentives

As described further in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company primarily derives its revenues by providing monetization services. The Company determined that its customer in the provision of its technology platform and services is the game developer. The monetization services provided by the Company allow game developers to offer multi-player competition to end-users. Efforts by the Company to drive traffic to the game platform involve the offering of promotions and incentives to end-users in various forms. Promotions and incentives that are determined to be consideration payable to a customer are presented as a reduction of revenue, while all other promotions and incentives are presented as sales and marketing expenses. The Company determines which promotions and incentives represent consideration payable to a customer based on its evaluation of whether the game developers have a valid expectation that the promotions and incentives will be offered to end-users. The Company’s determination of a valid expectation is based on an evaluation of all information reasonably available to the game developers regarding the Company’s customary business practices, published policies and specific statements. We identified the classification of end-user incentives as a critical audit matter.

The principal considerations for our determination that the classification of end-user incentives is a critical audit matter are that evaluating the appropriateness of this assessment requires subjective auditor judgment in the application of U.S. GAAP to the specific facts of each incentive program, as well as an increased extent of audit effort in evaluating the completeness and accuracy of information relevant to the assessment.

Our audit procedures related to the classification of end-user incentives included the following, among others.

•We evaluated the appropriateness of the entity’s accounting policy in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

•Read and evaluated certain contracts and terms of service with game developers and end-users.

•Performed corroborative inquiries and confirmed key terms and conditions with selected game developers.

•Inspected publicly available information published on the Company’s website and social media platforms and evaluated the consistency of these information sources with the Company’s assessment.

•Inquired of Company personnel in operational, IT, and strategy roles to evaluate the completeness of incentive programs subjected to the Company’s assessment.

•Engaged in live end-user game play and evaluated whether all incentives earned through game play were accurately included in the Company’s assessment.

Monetization services: use of system-generated audit evidence

As described further in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company provides monetization services for game developers’ game content. As disclosed in management’s report on internal control over financial reporting, the Company identified material weaknesses as of December 31, 2024. The material weaknesses included ineffective information technology general controls (ITGCs) in the areas of user access and program change management controls. As a result of the ITGC material weakness, the Company’s related information technology (IT) dependent manual and application controls were also deemed ineffective. The prevention, detection, and correction of material misstatements of the consolidated financial statements is dependent, in part, on management designing and implementing effective ITGCs and related IT dependent manual and application controls related to financial reporting processes. We identified the use of system-generated audit evidence related to the Company’s monetization services as a critical audit matter.

The principal considerations for our determination that this matter is a critical audit matter are that the existence of material weaknesses in ITGCs necessitated (i) especially challenging and complex auditor judgment in designing audit procedures and determining that sufficient appropriate audit evidence is obtained for the accounts and disclosures associated with the Company’s monetization services and (ii) increased audit effort through the use of individuals with specialized skill and knowledge in information technology.

Our audit procedures related to the use of system-generated audit evidence related to the Company’s monetization services included the following, among others.

•We engaged in live end-user game play during the period and traced the related transactions into the system data.

•We tested reconciliations of end-user net cash deposits and withdrawals during the period from payment processors.

•We tested reconciliations of transactions from the system data to the amounts recorded in the general ledger.

•With the assistance of information technology professionals, we:

◦Inspected relevant IT systems to identify and evaluate financially relevant changes during the audit period;

◦Evaluated the appropriateness of user access for the database of the relevant underlying systems;

◦Identified and inspected the code controlling each transaction type, tested the operating effectiveness and inspected the last modification date of each code configuration to determine that no relevant changes were made to that piece of code during the period; and

◦For code changes identified, inspected the code to determine the change was appropriate.

Assessment of indirect tax liabilities

As described further in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company is subject to indirect taxes, including sales and use tax in the United States. There is a high degree of complexity involved in the interpretation and application of indirect tax law to the Company’s activities for certain domestic jurisdictions. Significant judgments are made by management in estimating these liabilities, which include assessing the taxability of services transacted using the Company’s technology solution. We identified the assessment of indirect tax liabilities for certain domestic jurisdictions as a critical audit matter.

The principal consideration for our determination that this matter is a critical audit matter is that management makes significant judgments when determining the indirect tax liabilities for certain domestic jurisdictions, including taxability of services transacted using the Company’s technology solution. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence relating to the indirect tax liabilities. In addition, the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.

Our audit procedures related to the assessment of indirect tax liabilities included the following, among others:

•With the assistance of our indirect tax specialists, we evaluated management’s assessment of the indirect tax law enacted by certain taxing authorities as well as their determination regarding taxability of the Company’s services transacted using the Company’s technology solution.

•We inspected correspondence between the Company and certain tax authorities.

•We tested the completeness and accuracy of information used in the indirect tax liabilities calculations related to the underlying sales activity and tax rates.

/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2023.

San Jose, California

November 6, 2025

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Skillz Inc.

Opinion on internal control over financial reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Skillz Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses described in the following paragraphs on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weaknesses have been identified and included in management’s assessment.

•Ineffectively designed risk assessment process impacting internal control over financial reporting and ineffective monitoring controls. As a result, the Company did not appropriately reassess and adequately design and implement controls over financial reporting, including identification and review of disclosures and monitoring controls, and in providing the appropriate evidence of revenue and reconciliations, budgets, and key elements of the financial close process;

•Ineffective information technology general controls (ITGCs) in the areas of user access and segregation of duties, program change management and program operations over information technology (IT) systems that support the Company’s financial reporting processes were not designed or operating effectively; and

•Ineffectively designed and operating controls due to insufficient documentation of control activities and retention of evidence to demonstrate management’s review, as well as the ineffective implementation of controls to prevent and detect misstatements across several accounting processes, including the financial statement close process.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024. The material weaknesses identified above were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2024 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated November 6, 2025 which expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and limitations of internal control over financial reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

San Jose, California

November 6, 2025

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except for number of shares and par value per share amounts)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands, except for number of shares and per share amounts)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands, except for number of shares)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

1. Description of the Business and Basis of Presentation

Business

Skillz (the “Company” or “Skillz”) operates a competitive multi-player platform, driving the future of entertainment by accelerating the convergence of video games, real world prizes, and media. The Company’s principal activities are to develop and support a proprietary online-hosted technology platform that creates a multi-player system inside of game developer’s games (“Competitions”) to end-players worldwide.

Aarki (“Aarki”) is a subsidiary of the Company and is an artificial intelligence company that delivers advertising solutions to drive revenue growth for mobile app developers. Aarki enables brands to effectively engage audiences in a privacy-first world by using billions of contextual bidding signals coupled with proprietary machine learning and behavioral models. Aarki works with advertisers globally and manages ad requests on mobile devices.

Basis of Presentation

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) as determined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and pursuant to the regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company’s fiscal year ends on December 31st of each year.

Reverse Stock Split

On June 23, 2023, the Company effectuated a one-for-twenty reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock. As a result of the reverse stock split, every 20 shares of issued and outstanding Common Stock were combined and converted into one issued and outstanding share of Common Stock, and the number of authorized shares of Common Stock was reduced proportionately. The par value per share of Common Stock remains unchanged. The Company’s Class A Common Stock began trading on a split-adjusted basis on the NYSE at market open on June 26, 2023. All share and per-share amounts have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the impact of the reverse stock split. The Company has retroactively applied the stock split made effective on June 23, 2023, to share and per share amounts on the consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, any information related to or dependent upon the share amounts in the consolidated financial statements has been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the effect of the stock split.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified or changed to conform to the current-year presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on previously reported net income.

Immaterial Out-Of-Period Adjustments

During the quarter ended December 31, 2024, the Company recorded certain immaterial out-of-period adjustments related to the following:

1. Accounting for indirect taxes: This adjustment related to a prior period change in the calculation of indirect taxes, which resulted in the correction of an understatement to our indirect tax liability and overstatement of revenue of $1.1 million.

2. Accounting for classification of certain incentives: This adjustment resulted in the correction of an overstatement of selling and marketing expense and an overstatement of revenue of $1.7 million.

The Company assessed the materiality of these adjustments on the previously issued financial statements in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 1.M, Materiality and concluded they were not material to the previously issued consolidated financial statements.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in these financial statements and the accompanying notes. Estimates are used in several areas including, but not limited to, end-user incentives, including Bonus Cash and Ticketz accrual, indirect tax liabilities, the fair value of non-marketable securities, and the impairment of long-lived assets. The Company bases these estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities. The actual results may materially differ from these estimates.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue for its services in accordance with the FASB ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). For additional information see Note 4, Revenue.

Cost of revenue primarily consists of third-party payment processing fees, server costs, amortization of developed technology, personnel expenses, direct software costs, amortization of internal use software, hosting expenses, and allocation of shared facility and other costs.

Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash, commercial paper, money market funds and U.S. government agency securities with maturities of three months or less when purchased.

Restricted cash consisted of cash maintained under an agreement that legally restricts the use of such funds and was not included within cash and cash equivalents. For the years ended December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023 restricted cash of $10.0 million relates to the letter of credit for the Company’s former headquarters in San Francisco and cash required to be held by our financial institution. In April 2025, the Company executed a settlement with the landlord of the Company’s former headquarters and as such, in September 2025, the portion of the letter of credit related to the lease was terminated. In addition, the financial institution reduced the amount it required of cash held. As such, in September 2025, the letter of credit was reduced from a total of $10 million to $1 million and in the accompanying balance sheet dated December 31, 2024, $9 million of restricted cash is presented as restricted cash, a component of current assets.

A reconciliation of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents in the consolidated balance sheets to cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash in the consolidated statements of cash flows as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 is as follows:

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and marketable securities. Although the Company deposits its cash with multiple, established financial institutions, the deposits, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced losses on its deposits of cash and cash equivalents. The Company limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer and monitors the financial condition of the financial institutions on a regular basis. At December 31, 2024, the Company had cash balances on deposit with various financial institutions that in the aggregate exceeded the federally insured limits in the amount of $278.2 million.

Accounts Receivable, Net

Accounts receivable, net, represents amounts recorded for programmatic media campaigns, net of an allowance for credit losses from our advertising revenue customers of our Aarki segment. The allowance for credit losses is recorded as an offset to accounts receivable and changes in such are classified as general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company assesses collectability by reviewing accounts receivable on a collective basis where similar characteristics exist and on an individual basis when there are specific customers with known disputes or collectability issues. In determining the amount of the allowance for credit losses, the Company considers historical collectability based on past due status and makes judgments about the creditworthiness of customers based on ongoing credit evaluations. The Company also considers customer-specific information, current market conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions to inform adjustments to historical loss data.

The account activity in the allowance for credit losses for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 is as follows:

Four customers of Aarki accounted for 18%,14%,10% and 10%, of the accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2024, and three customers of Aarki account for 37%,12% and 9% of the accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2023.

Fair Value Measurement

The Company applies fair value accounting for financial assets and liabilities and non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis. The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining fair value measurements for assets and liabilities, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and the market-based risk measurements or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, such as risks inherent in valuation techniques, transfer restrictions and credit risk. Fair value is estimated by applying the following hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels and bases the categorization within the hierarchy upon the lowest level of input that is available and significant to the fair value measurement:

Level 1 — Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 — Inputs reflect quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities; or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s estimate of assumptions incorporated in valuation techniques used to determine fair value. These assumptions are required to be consistent with market participant assumptions that are reasonably available.

The fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Certain financial instruments, including debt, are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of debt was estimated using primarily level 2 inputs including quoted market prices or present value of future payments discounted by the market interest rates or the fixed rates based on current rates offered to the Company for debt with similar terms and maturities.

Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived assets primarily consist of property and equipment with estimable useful lives subject to depreciation and amortization. The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. When impairment indicators are identified, the Company assesses its long-lived assets for impairment. Recoverability of an asset or asset group to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset or asset group to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset or asset group. If the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds the fair value of the asset or asset group.

On March 15, 2023, the Company completed the purchase of an office building in Las Vegas, Nevada for $11.5 million, with $10.5 million and $1.0 million allocated to building and land components, respectively. The building will be depreciated on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life of 39 years. The land is not subject to depreciation. The building has been utilized as the Company’s headquarters effective since February 2024.

Investments

The Company considers all highly liquid interest-earning investments with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. The fair values of these investments approximate their carrying values. In general, investments with original maturities of greater than three months and remaining maturities of less than one year are classified as short-term investments. Investments with maturities beyond one year are classified as non-current marketable securities. Dividend and interest income are recognized when earned.

Marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and realized gains and losses are recorded using the specific identification method. Changes in fair value, excluding credit losses and impairments, are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Fair value is calculated based on publicly available market information or other estimates determined by management. If the cost of an investment exceeds its fair value, the Company evaluates, among other factors, general market conditions, credit quality of debt instrument issuers, and the extent to which the fair value is less than cost. To determine credit losses, the Company employs a systematic methodology that considers available quantitative and qualitative evidence. In addition, the Company considers specific adverse conditions related to the financial health of, and business outlook for, the investee. If the Company plans to sell the security or it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery, then a decline in fair value below cost is recorded as an impairment charge in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss and a new cost basis in the investment is established. If market, industry, and/or investee conditions deteriorate, the Company may incur future impairments.

The Company has elected to measure its existing investments in non-marketable equity securities at cost, less impairments, with remeasurements to fair value only upon the occurrence of observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or similar securities of the same issuer (“measurement alternative”). This election is reassessed each reporting period to determine whether non-marketable equity securities have a readily determinable fair value, in which case they would no longer be eligible for this election and would be measured at fair value. The Company evaluates its non-marketable equity securities for impairment at each reporting period based on a qualitative assessment that considers various potential impairment indicators. Impairment indicators might include, but would not necessarily be limited to, a significant deterioration in the earnings performance, credit rating, asset quality, or business prospects of the investee, a significant adverse change in the regulatory, economic, or technological environment of the investee, a bona fide offer to purchase, an offer by the investee to sell, or a completed auction process for the same or similar securities for an amount less than the carrying amount of the investments in those securities. If an impairment exists, a loss is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the investment. Gains and losses resulting from the remeasurement of non-marketable equity securities, including impairment, are recorded through other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company separately presents investments in non-marketable equity securities within long-term assets on the consolidated balance sheets.

Variable Interest Entities

A variable interest entity ("VIE") is an entity that either (i) has insufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or (ii) has equity investors who lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. Under ASC 810 “Consolidation,” an entity that holds a variable interest in a VIE and meets certain requirements would be considered to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE and required to consolidate the VIE in its consolidated financial statements. In order to be considered the primary beneficiary of a VIE, an entity must hold a variable interest in the VIE and have both:

•the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE; and

•the right to receive benefits from, or the obligation to absorb losses of, the VIE that could be potentially significant to the VIE.

The Company holds a cost method investment in Big Run Studios, Inc. (“Big Run”), a privately held variable interest entity and one of the Company’s top game developers. The Company determined that it is not the primary beneficiary as it does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s performance. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company fully impaired the carrying value of its investment in Big Run of $2.9 million due to significant concerns about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. During 2023, the Company also loaned Big Run $2.0 million pursuant to a loan agreement for the purpose of allowing Big Run to meet its cash flow needs. This loan was fully repaid in 2024 (see Note 5, Balance Sheet Components).

Advertising and Promotional Expense

Advertising and promotional expenses are included in sales and marketing expenses within the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss and are expensed when incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, advertising expenses, not including marketing promotions related to the Company’s end-user incentive programs, were $19.4 million and $30.7 million, respectively.

User Acquisition

User acquisition (“UA”) marketing costs to acquire new paying users to the platform are presented in sales and marketing expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. UA marketing costs during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 were approximately $18.4 million and $29.4 million, respectively.

Private Common Stock Warrant Liabilities

As part of the closing of Flying Eagle Acquisition Corporation’s, a Delaware corporation (“FEAC”), initial public offering, FEAC completed the private sale of 501,667 warrants to FEAC’s sponsor at a purchase price of $30.00 per warrant (the “Private Warrants”). In connection with the FEAC Business Combination, FEAC’s sponsor agreed to forfeit 250,833 Private

Warrants. Each Private Warrant allows the sponsor to purchaseone share of Class A common stock at $230.00 per share. There were 226,786 Private Warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.

The Private Warrants and the shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of the Private Warrants are not transferable, assignable or salable, subject to certain limited exceptions. Additionally, the Private Warrants are exercisable for cash or on a cashless basis, and are non-redeemable so long as they are held by the initial purchasers or their permitted transferees. If the Private Warrants are held by someone other than the initial purchasers or their permitted transferees, the Private Warrants will be redeemable by the Company and exercisable by such holders on the same basis as the Public Warrants.

The Company evaluated the Private Common Stock Warrants under ASC 815-40, Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (“ASC 815-40”), and concluded that they do not meet the criteria to be classified in stockholders’ equity. Specifically, the exercise of the Private Common Stock Warrants may be settled in cash upon the occurrence of a tender offer or exchange that involves 50% or more of the Company’s Class A stockholders. As there are two classes of common stock, and not all of the stockholders need to participate in such tender offer or exchange to trigger the potential cash settlement and the Company does not control the occurrence of such an event, the Company concluded that the Private Warrants do not meet the conditions to be classified in equity. Since the Private Common Stock Warrants meet the definition of a derivative under ASC 815, the Company recorded these warrants as liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value, with subsequent changes in their respective fair values recognized in theconsolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss at each reporting date.

The Private Warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes-Merton Option pricing model that is based on the individual characteristics of the warrants on the valuation date, which include the Company’s stock price and assumptions for expected volatility, expected life and risk-free interest rate, as well as the present value of the minimum cash payment component of the instrument for the warrants, when applicable. Changes in the assumptions used could have a material impact on the resulting fair value of each warrant. The primary inputs affecting the value of the warrant liability are the Company’s stock price and volatility in the Company's stock price, as well as assumptions about the probability and timing of certain events, such as a change in control or future equity offerings. Increases in the fair value of the underlying stock or increases in the volatility of the stock price generally result in a corresponding increase in the fair value of the warrant liability; conversely, decreases in the fair value of the underlying stock or decreases in the volatility of the stock price generally result in a corresponding decrease in the fair value of the warrant liability. As of December 31, 2024, the carrying value of the warrant liability was reduced tozero.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks. The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments, including its long-term debt to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. Embedded derivatives must be separately measured from the host contract if all the requirements for bifurcation are met. The assessment of the conditions surrounding the bifurcation of embedded derivatives depends on the nature of the host contract. Bifurcated embedded derivatives and freestanding derivative financial instruments that are classified as assets or liabilities are recognized at fair value with changes in fair value recognized as a component of other income (expense), net in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all stock-based awards based on estimated grant-date fair values recognized over the requisite service period. For awards that vest solely based on a service condition, the Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The compensation expense related to awards with company-based performance conditions is recognized over the requisite service period when the performance conditions are probable of being achieved. The compensation expense related to awards with market-based performance conditions is recognized on an accelerated attribution basis over the requisite service period identified as the derived service period over which the market conditions are expected to be achieved and is not reversed if the market condition is not satisfied (see Note 14, Stock-Based Compensation, for more information). The Company accounts for forfeitures as they occur. If an employee stock-based award is canceled without the concurrent grant or offer of a replacement award, the cancellation is treated as a settlement for no consideration and any previously unrecognized compensation cost shall be recognized at the cancellation date. Stock-based awards granted to employees are primarily stock options and restricted stock units.

The Company has primarily granted restricted stock units (“RSUs”), which have a service-based vesting condition over afour-year period to members of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) and, since 2023, over aone-year period to its employees. The fair value of each share of underlying common stock is based on the closing price of the Company's common stock on the date of the grant. Also, the Company has granted RSU’s that have a performance-based vesting condition based on the Company meeting minimum targets based on either Gross Marketplace Volume (“GMV”) or Adjusted EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. Given that the actual results were less than the minimum targets in 2024 and 2023, no performance-based targets vested in 2024 or 2023.

For awards with market-based performance conditions, the Company determines the grant date fair value utilizing a Monte Carlo valuation model, which incorporates various assumptions including expected stock price volatility, expected term, risk-free interest rates, expected date of a qualifying event, expected capital raise percentage and market capitalization milestones. Given the Company’s limited market trading history, it has estimated the volatility of its common stock on the date of grant of awards with market conditions based on the weighted average historical stock price volatility of comparable publicly-traded companies in its industry group. The Company estimated the expected term of its awards with market-based performance conditions based on various exercise scenarios, as these awards are not considered “plain vanilla.” The Company utilized a risk-free interest rate based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The Company estimated the expected date of a qualifying event, the expected capital raise percentage and the expected achievement date of market capitalization milestones based on management’s expectations at the time of measurement of the award’s value.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or in the Company’s tax returns. Deferred income taxes are recognized for differences between financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities at the enacted statutory tax rates in effect for the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon future earnings, the timing and amount of which are uncertain.

The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to the net amount that the Company believes is more likely than not to be realized. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, the Company considered historical levels of income, expectations of future taxable income and ongoing tax planning strategies. In light of the uncertainty of the realization of our deferred tax assets, the Company recorded a full valuation allowance against deferred tax assets. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent primarily upon future U.S. taxable income.

The Company utilizes a two-step approach to recognize and measure uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon tax authority examination, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement.

Although the Company believes it has adequately reserved for uncertain tax positions, management can provide no assurance that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be materially different. The Company evaluates its uncertain tax position on a regular basis and evaluations are based on a number of factors, including changes in facts and circumstances, changes in tax law, correspondence with tax authorities during the course of an audit and effective settlement of audit issues.

To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will affect the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made and could have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition and operating results. The provision for income taxes includes the effects of any accruals that the Company believes are appropriate, as well as the related net interest and penalties. The Company accounts for taxes due on future U.S. inclusions in taxable income under the Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (“GILTI”) provision as a current-period expense when incurred.

Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the related asset, generally three tofive years, except for the Company’s owned building, which is 39 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the term of the related lease. Maintenance and repairs that do not extend the life or improve the asset are expensed as incurred. Upon disposal of property and equipment, assets and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and the related gain or loss is included in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss as a component of other income (expense), net.

Property and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying amounts to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate. If property and equipment are considered to be impaired, the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value would represent the impairment to be recognized. Refer to Long-lived Assets above for impairment of long-lived assets.

The Company capitalizes certain costs related to developed software solely for internal use to deliver its services. The Company capitalizes costs during the application development stage once the preliminary project stage is complete, management authorizes and commits to funding the project, it is probable that the project will be completed, and that the software will be used to perform the function intended. Costs related to preliminary project activities and post-implementation activities are expensed as incurred.

The following table presents the estimated useful lives of the Company’s property and equipment:

Leases

The Company accounted for leases in accordance with Accounting Standards Update Topic 842 (“ASC 842”). Under ASC 842, the Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Right of Use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of remaining lease payments over the lease term. For this purpose, the Company considers lease payments that are fixed at the time of commencement. As most of the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate, it uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The determination of an appropriate incremental borrowing rate requires judgment. The Company determines its incremental borrowing rate based on publicly available data for instruments with similar characteristics, including recently issued debt, as well as other factors. The ROU asset also includes any lease payments made prior to commencement and is recorded net of any lease incentives received. The Company has elected to account for short-term leases by recognizing lease payments in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the lease term, and variable lease payments in the period in which the obligation for those payments is incurred.

The Company’s lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that it will exercise such options. When determining the probability of exercising such options, the Company considers contract-based, asset-based, entity-based, and market-based factors. The Company’s lease agreements may contain variable costs such as common area maintenance, insurance, real estate taxes or other costs. Variable lease costs are expensed as general and administrative expenses as incurred on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company’s lease agreements generally do not contain any residual value guarantees or restrictive covenants.

ROU assets related to the Company’s operating leases are included in operating lease ROU assets, while the corresponding lease liabilities are included in current and non-current operating lease liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. ROU assets related to the Company’s finance leases are included in property and equipment, while the corresponding lease liabilities are included inother current liabilities andother non-current long-term liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company recorded a full impairment of an ROU asset, resulting in an impairment charge of $11.5 million.

Interest Income (Expense), Net

Interest income (expense), net consisted of the following for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.

Indirect Tax Liabilities

The Company is subject to indirect taxes such as sales and use tax in the United States and value-added tax in certain foreign jurisdictions, respectively. Indirect tax liabilities are adjusted considering changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax examination, further interpretation of existing tax law, or new tax law. The Company recognizes changes to its estimate if it is estimable and probable that its position would not be sustainable upon examination by taxing authorities. Although management believes the Company’s recorded liabilities are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcomes of these matters will not be different from that which its liabilities are based on. To the extent that final tax outcomes of these matters are different than the amounts recorded, such differences could have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as the Company records related tax reserves as a reduction in revenue, and penalties and interest in general and administrative expenses. The Company recorded indirect tax liabilities of $14.9 million and $11.2 million in 2024 and 2023, respectively. See Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies.

Segments

Operating segments are defined as components of an entity for which separate financial information is available and that are regularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources to an individual segment and in assessing performance. Effective beginning in the fourth quarter of 2023, the Company hadtwo operating and reportable segments. See Note 17, Segment Reporting.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards and Updates

In November 2023, the FASB issued an update, ASU 2023-07, “Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures,” which requires public entities to disclose information about their reportable segments’ significant expenses and other segment items on an interim and annual basis. ASU 2023-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company adopted this update and has retrospectively applied the disclosure requirement to all prior periods presented in its consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures,” which requires public entities to disclose specific tax rate reconciliation categories, as well as income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction, amongst other disclosure enhancements. The ASU is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. The amendments in ASU 2023-09 should be applied on a prospective basis and retrospective application is permitted. The Company is evaluating the disclosure requirements related to the new standard.

In November 2024, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2024-03, “Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses” and an amendment ASU 2025-01 that clarified the effective date. The new standard requires public entities to disclose disaggregated information about certain costs and expenses in the notes to their financial statements in both annual and interim filings. ASU 2024-03 is effective for financial statements issued for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, with early adoption permitted and can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. The Company is evaluating the disclosure requirements related to the new standard.

In March 2025, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2025-02, “Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 122” which eliminates the requirement to recognize a liability and corresponding asset for obligations to safeguard crypto assets. This was effective immediately upon its release and applied retrospectively for annual reporting periods after December 15, 2024. The Company believes this standard will have no material impact on its financial statements or footnotes.

In May 2025, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2025-03, “Determining the Accounting Acquirer in the Acquisition of a Variable Interest Entity” which addresses how to determine the accounting acquirer in business combinations when the legal acquiree is a VIE, especially when the transaction primarily involves the exchange of equity interests. ASU 2024-03 is effective for financial statements issued for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, with early adoption permitted and is to be applied prospectively. The Company is evaluating the disclosure requirements related to the new standard.

3. Spin-Off Transaction

On August 31, 2023, in order to more directly incentivize the key employees of the Company’s subsidiary, Aarki, Inc. (“Aarki”), the Company made the determination to allow certain key employees of Aarki to receive equity awards in Aarki. In connection with the spin-off transaction, the Company provided Aarki $5.0 million to fund its operations in exchange for Series A Preferred Stock of Aarki. In December 2024, the Company provided Aarki an additional $5.0 million to fund its operations in exchange for Series B Preferred Stock of Aarki. Both the Series A and Series B funding transactions were eliminated in consolidation and were used to provide working capital to Aarki. Subsequent to the funding of Series B, on a fully diluted basis, the awards would represent 17.6% of the ownership of Aarki, which, as of December 31, 2024 and 2023,13.4% and 0.0% of the awards had been granted, respectively. Vested and exercised awards constituted an immaterial non-controlling interest in Aarki. The Company does not intend to grant future Skillz equity awards to Aarki employees.

In connection with the foregoing, Aarki is also being designated as an unrestricted subsidiary under the indenture governing the Company’s 10.25% Secured Notes due 2026.

4. Revenue

The following tables present our revenues, disaggregated by offering, geographical region, and reportable segment. Revenue by geographical region is based on the location where the game developer or advertising customer is headquartered. Revenue is recognized net of any taxes collected from customers (e.g., sales and other indirect taxes), which are subsequently remitted to governmental entities. For more information on revenues presented by reportable segments, see Note 17, Segment Reporting.

Revenue from Entry Fees

The Company generates substantially all its revenues through its competition-based Skillz segment by providing a service to game developers for monetization of their game content. The monetization service provided by Skillz allows developers to offer multi-player competition to their end-users for the purpose of end-user retention and engagement. Skillz provides developers with a software development kit (“SDK”) they can download and integrate with their existing games. The SDK serves as a data interface between Skillz and the game developers that enables Skillz to provide monetization services to the developer.

The Company applies the five-step model to achieve the core principle of ASC 606. The Company determined that its customer in the provision of its technology platform and services is the game developer. The Company’s ordinary activities consist of providing game developers services through access to its technology platform using the Skillz SDK. The SDK acts as an application programming interface enabling communication of data between Skillz and the game developers, which when integrated with the developer’s game content, facilitates end-user registration into competitions, managing and hosting end-user competition accounts, matching players of similar skill levels, collecting end-user entry fees, distributing end-user prizes, resolving end-user disputes pertaining to their participation in competitions, and running third-party marketing campaigns (collectively, “Monetization Services”).

The Company provides Monetization Services to game developers enabling them to offer competitive games to their end-users. These activities are not distinct from each other as the Company provides an integrated service enabling game developers to provide the competitive game service to the end-users, and as a result, they do not represent separate performance obligations. The Company is entitled to a revenue share based on total entry fees for paid competitions, regardless of how they are paid, net of end-user prizes (i.e., winnings from the competitions) and other costs to provide the Monetization Services. Entry fees used to enter paid competitions can include net cash deposits, cash from prior winnings, and end-user incentives. The game developers earn monthly revenue share from end-users, calculated based on end users’ paid entry fees attributable to their games as a percentage of total entry fees. End-user incentives are not paid for by game developers. In addition, the Company accounts for end-user incentives either as a reduction of revenue or as sales and marketing expenses (as noted below).

The Company collects entry fees and related charges from end-users on behalf of game developers. This is done via the end-user’s pre-authorized credit card or PayPal account. The Company withholds its portion of revenue share and administrative costs from these entry fees. The balance is then recorded as a reduction to revenue for the amount owed to the game developer. Therefore, the game developer’s ability and intent to pay the amounts withheld by the Company is not subject to significant judgment or collection risk. Certain of Skillz’ larger developer agreements provide the Company with a right to withhold additional amounts from their revenue share. These amounts relate to game-specific sales and marketing costs incurred by the Company, in its sole discretion, to acquire end-users on behalf of the game developer. The amount and timing of such withholding(s) is (are) uncertain and based on the future performance of the respective developer’s games. Such amounts are recorded as part of the monthly settlement process with the game developer. Accordingly, the Company has included these amounts as a reduction to the revenue share paid to game developers.

Revenue is recognized at the time the performance obligation is satisfied by transferring control of the promised service in an amount that reflects the consideration that the Company expects to receive in exchange for the Monetization Services. The Company does not recognize contract assets or contract liabilities as the payment of the transaction price is concurrent with fulfillment of the services. At the time of game completion, the Company has a right to receive payment for services rendered. The Company’s agreements with game developers can generally be terminated for convenience by either party upon thirty days prior written notice, and in certain of the Company’s larger agreements, the game developer, if required by the Company, must continue to make its games available on the platform for a period of up to twelve months. The Company's agreements with certain game developers cannot be terminated by the developer without the Company's approval for a period of at least eighteen months under certain conditions. In accordance with optional exemptions available under Topic 606, the Company does not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for (1) contracts with an original expected length of one year or less, and (2) contracts for which variable consideration relates entirely to an unsatisfied performance obligation or to an unsatisfied promise to transfer a distinct service that forms a part of a single performance obligation.

Games provided by two developer partners accounted for 71% and 73% of the Company’s revenue for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

End-User Incentive Programs

To drive traffic to the platform, the Company provides promotions and incentives to end-users in various forms. Evaluating whether a promotion or incentive is a payment to a customer may require significant judgment. Certain promotions and incentives that are consideration payable to customers, are recognized as a reduction of revenue at the later of when revenue is recognized or when the Company pays or promises to pay the incentive. Promotions and incentives recorded as sales and marketing expenses are recognized when we incur the related cost.

Our primary end-user incentive is Bonus Cash, which is a promotional incentive that cannot be withdrawn and can only be used by end-users to enter paid-entry fee contests. Bonus Cash used as entry fees for paid Competitions can include newly issued Bonus Cash and / or Bonus Cash returned to end-users from prior winnings. We recognize the entire cost of Bonus Cash as sales and marketing expenses or a reduction of revenue (as discussed below). When Bonus Cash is used towards entry fees for a paid Competition and is returned to an end-user as winnings, we do not record any additional sales and marketing expenses or reductions to revenue. Likewise, if Bonus Cash is returned to an end-user and is used to enter subsequent competitions, which they continue to win, we do not record any additional sales and marketing expenses or reductions to revenue.

•Marketing promotions and discounts accounted for as reductions to revenue. These promotions are typically pricing actions in the form of discounts that reduce end-user entry fees. These are offered on behalf of the game developers. Although not required based on the Company’s agreement with its game developers, the Company considers that game developers have a valid expectation that certain incentives will be offered to end-users. The determination of a valid expectation is based on an evaluation of all information reasonably available to game developers regarding the Company’s customary business practices, published policies and specific statements.

An example of an incentive for which the game developer has a valid expectation is the initial deposit Bonus Cash that can be earned in fixed amounts when an end-user makes their first deposit on the Skillz platform. Bonus Cash can only be applied by end-users towards future paid-entry fee competitions and cannot be withdrawn.

Another example of this type of incentive would be the redemption of Ticketz earned via game play for either Bonus Cash or merchandise. The redemption process is managed by Skillz and redemption amounts can be changed at Skillz discretion.

For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company recognized a reduction of revenue of $13.7 million and $25.8 million, respectively, related to these end-user incentives.

•Marketing promotions accounted for as sales and marketing expenses. When the Company concludes that game developers do not have a valid expectation that an incentive will be offered, Management records the related cost as sales and marketing expenses. Management’s assessment is based on an evaluation of all information reasonably available to game developers regarding the Company’s customary business practices, published policies and specific statements. These promotions are offered to end-users to draw, re-engage, or generally increase their use of the Skillz platform.

An example of this type of incentive is limited-time Bonus Cash offers, which are targeted to specific end-users, typically those who deposit more frequently or have not made a deposit recently, via email or in-app promotions. The Company targets groups of end-users differently, offering specific promotions it believes will best stimulate engagement. Similar to Bonus Cash earned from the redemption of “Ticketz”, which are virtual currency earned for every competition played based on the amount of the entry fee, or an initial deposit, limited-time Bonus Cash can only be used by end-users to enter future paid entry fee competitions and cannot be withdrawn. The Company also hosts engagement marketing leagues, which run over a period of days or weeks. Prizes are awarded to winners in the form of cash or luxury goods to end-users earning the most medals at the end of the league. End-users accumulate medals by winning Skillz enabled paid entry fee competitions. Skillz determines whether (or not) to run a league, what prizes should be awarded, over what time period the league should run, and to which end-users’ prizes should be paid, all at the Company’s discretion. The parameters vary from one league to the next and are not reasonably known, nor communicated to game developers. League prizes in the form of cash can be withdrawn or applied towards future paid-entry fee competitions.

For the years ended December 31, 2024, and 2023, the Company recognized sales and marketing expense of $35.8 million and $58.9 million, respectively, related to these end-user incentives.

From time to time, the Company issues credits or refunds to end-users that are dissatisfied by the level of service provided by the game developer. There is no contractual obligation for the Company to refund such end-users nor is there a valid expectation by game developers for the Company to issue such credits or refunds to end-users on their behalf. The Company accounts for credits or refunds, which are not recoverable from the game developer, as sales and marketing expenses when incurred.

Total engagement marketing accounted for as sales and marketing expense recognized in the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 were $37.0 million and $64.9 million, respectively.

Advertising Revenue

The Company offers a technology platform (i.e. demand side platform, “DSP”) to source available advertising space from its network of vendors / suppliers (aka, advertising exchange partners / publishers), which uses a real-time auction process. The revenue from advertising is recognized over time based on the number of impressions as the performance obligation is satisfied. The Company considers itself the agent of its customer(s). This is due to the Company’s involvement in programmatically placing and sourcing advertisements on behalf of customers via a network of third party publishers. The Company does not, at any time, take ownership of advertising inventory being sourced and placed. Via the DSP, if the Company wins the auction and an impression is served, the customer’s advertisement is displayed on the publisher / supplier’s mobile application.

Management evaluates whether the performance obligation contained in its insertion order (“IO”) is distinct within the context of a customer contract as defined above. We determined the nature of our performance obligations to customers is to run their programmatic media campaigns by delivering advertisements to their target audience(s). This is carried out based on parameters and strategies outlined by the customer. This performance obligation to the customer incorporates the following:

•The DSP and related services (i.e., development of campaign strategy, provision of creative services, campaign flighting, performance monitoring and serving of the ads); and

•Sourcing mobile advertising space from the Company’s network of vendors / suppliers.

None of these promises are separately identifiable from each other in the contract, as they are integrated with the DSP to provide the customer a combined output. The output empowers the customer to acquire the most valuable space for their mobile advertising campaign based on a pre-established / maximum budget in the IO. Our customers do not dictate where or how the Company sources advertising space. Likewise, the Company does not take ownership of any inventory before the mobile advertisement is served to the customer.

For performance obligations related to advertising revenue, customers are extended 30 day payment terms from completion of each month’s IO and no advertising revenue customers accounted for more than 5% of the Company’s revenue in either of the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

The Company recognizes an asset for incremental costs of obtaining a contract with the customer as long as Management expects to recover these costs. Incremental costs are those that would have not been incurred if the contract did not exist. Examples of incremental costs often capitalized are sales commissions whereas examples of costs that would not be included are internal employee salaries, standard benefits, travel costs, and other / general legal costs. Sales commissions are the only incremental contract costs the Company incurs and are paid based on collected revenue based on the recipient’s assigned accounts. As commissions are typically satisfied within one year after an executed contract, the Company applies the practical expedient under ASC 340-40, Other Assets and Deferred Costs: Contracts with Customers.

Maintenance Fee Revenue

When a player becomes inactive on the platform by not participating in a tournament for six consecutive months, the Company will impose a monthly maintenance fee. This fee is charged to the player and recognized as revenue by the Company beginning in the seventh month of inactivity.

5. Balance Sheet Components

Note Receivable

Note receivable included in other long-term assets on the consolidated balance sheets consisted of the following as of December 31, 2024 and 2023:

On July 7, 2023, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (together, the “Credit Agreement”) whereby it would lend approximately $2.0 million to Big Run Studio (“Big Run”) at a designated rate of 11.5%, with interest-only for the first six months being paid, at Big Run’s option each month, (1) in cash or (2) in-kind and compounded monthly to the principal and maturing on June 1, 2025. The interest-only period may be extended insix month increments upon mutual written agreement between Big Run and Skillz. The credit facility was perfected by way of a Uniform Commercial Code-1 statement whereby the Company is provided first-order secured rights in the event of default by Big Run. On April 12, 2024, the Company and Big Run Studio entered into a Side Letter Agreement providing that a portion of the AviaGames settlement funds allocated to Big Run Studio be utilized to repay the outstanding principal amount and accrued interest under the Loan and Security Agreement. On May 3, 2024, Big Run Studio repaid all of the outstanding principal amount and accrued interest under the Loan and Security Agreement. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company recognized $0.1 million and $0.1 million of interest income related to this Credit Agreement, respectively.

Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following as of December 31, 2024 and 2023:

Property and Equipment, net

Property and equipment, net consisted of the following as of December 31, 2024 and 2023:

Property and equipment, net by geography was as follows:

Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment was $1.7 million and $2.0 million in the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Non-marketable securities

Non-marketable equity securities are investments in privately held companies without readily determinable fair values. We have accounted for these investments using the measurement alternative. Under the measurement alternative, the equity investment is initially recorded as its allocated cost, but the carrying value may be adjusted through earnings upon an impairment or when there is an observable price change involving the same or a similar investment with the same issuer. There were no indicators of impairment or the occurrence of observable price changes during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. The carrying value of the Company’s investments without readily determinable fair values was $52.8 million and $52.8 million in December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, and was classified within “non-marketable equity securities” in the consolidated balance sheets.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company identified an impairment related to one of its investments in a privately held company. The Company reviewed the private company’s forecast and noted significant concerns about the private company’s ability to continue as a going concern. As a result, an impairment charge of $2.9 million was recorded as of December 31, 2023. The Company did not record any other adjustments to the carrying value of its non-marketable equity securities accounted for under the measurement alternative, and did not recognize any gains or losses related to the sale of non-marketable equity securities in the years ended December 31, 2024 or 2023.

Other Current Liabilities

Other current liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31, 2024 and 2023:

The Company recorded legal expense of $20.3 million and $15.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The increase in legal expense was primarily attributed to the settlement of the litigation with AviaGames. See Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies, for more details.

6. Fair Value Measurements

As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the recorded values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their respective fair values due to the short-term nature of the instruments.

Cash and money market funds are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Highly liquid investments such as commercial papers and corporate bonds are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

Available-for-Sale Investments

Available-for-sale investments were classified within Level 1 or Level 2 as the Company uses quoted market prices or alternative pricing sources and models utilizing market observable inputs to determine their fair value. The market values of Level 2 investments are determined based on observable inputs for securities other than quoted prices, such as interest rates, yield curves, and credit spreads, or quoted prices for identical or similar securities in markets that are not considered active. There were no transfers between levels during the periods presented.

Private Common Stock Warrants

The Private Warrants were classified within Level 3 as they were valued based on a Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model, which involved the use of certain unobservable inputs, such as expected volatility estimated based on the average historical stock price volatility of comparable companies. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the fair value of the Private Warrants liability was $0.0 and $11.0 thousand, respectively.

The following sets forth the activity for Private Warrants:

2021 Senior Secured Notes

The 2021 Senior Secured Notes are classified as Level 2 financial instruments, and the fair value of the notes is presented for disclosure purposes only. The Company determined the fair value of the notes is $121.6 million and $107.3 million as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively based on secondary market quotes.

The following sets forth the activity for the 2021 Senior Secured Notes:

7. Investments

Investment Components

The components of investments were as follows:

Non-marketable equity securities are investments in privately held companies without readily determinable fair values. We have accounted for these investments using the measurement alternative. Under the measurement alternative, the equity investment is initially recorded as its allocated cost, but the carrying value may be adjusted through earnings upon an impairment or when there is an observable price change involving the same or a similar investment with the same issuer. There were no indicators of impairment or the occurrence of observable price changes during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. The carrying value of the Company’s investments without readily determinable fair values was $52.8 million in both December 31, 2024 and 2023 and was classified within “non-marketable equity securities” in the consolidated balance sheets.

During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company identified an impairment related to one of its investments in a privately held company. The Company reviewed the private company’s forecast and noted significant concerns about the private company’s ability to continue as a going concern. As a result, an impairment charge of $2.9 million was recorded as of December 31, 2023. The Company did not record any other adjustments to the carrying value of its non-marketable equity securities accounted for under the measurement alternative, and did not recognize any gains or losses related to the sale of non-marketable equity securities in the years ended December 31, 2024 or 2023.

Unrealized Losses on Marketable Securities

The Company held no marketable securities as of December 31, 2024 and, as such, had no unrealized losses.

8. Long-Term Debt

Components of long-term debt were as follows as of December 31, 2024 and 2023:

2021 Senior Secured Notes

On December 20, 2021, the Company entered into $300 million of 10.25% secured notes (the “2021 Senior Secured Notes”) in a private placement to certain institutional buyers. The 2021 Senior Secured Notes are guaranteed by the Company’s domestic restricted subsidiaries. The interest is payable semiannually on June 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning on June 15, 2022. At issuance, the effective interest rate on the 2021 Senior Secured Notes was 12.14%, and maturity will be on December 15, 2026, unless repurchased or redeemed earlier.

On April 13, 2023, the Company repurchased approximately $159.8 million of its 2021 Senior Secured Notes. In connection with the repurchase, the Company recognized a gain on extinguishment of $15.2 million reflected in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The gain included payment discounts related to consideration below the par value and the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs and discounts.

After giving effect to the 2023 and other previous open market repurchases, as of December 31, 2024, $129.7 million of the 2021 Senior Secured Notes remained outstanding and the effective interest rate was 12.09%.

The 2021 Senior Secured Notes contain customary covenants restricting the Company’s ability to incur debt, incur liens, make distributions to stockholders, make certain transactions with the Company’s affiliates, together with other financial covenants and public filings of our financial statements. We were in compliance with all covenants applicable to the 2021 Senior Secured Notes as of December 31, 2024 and 2023.

Subsequently, on September 30, 2025, we were not in compliance with certain of the covenants (see Note 19, Subsequent Events).

Voluntary prepayments are permitted in whole, or in part, in minimum amounts as set forth in the Indenture Agreement governing the 2021 Senior Secured Notes, with prior notice, and with a prepayment premium of 3.417% on, or during, the twelve-month period that began on December 15, 2024. Voluntary prepayments made on, or during, the twelve-month period beginning December 15, 2025 are not subject to a prepayment premium.

Debt issuance costs incurred in connection with the 2021 Senior Secured Notes are capitalized and amortized to interest expense over thefive-year term using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. Debt issuance costs are included as contra-liabilities in long-term debt. The Company determined the fair value of the notes is $121.6 million as of December 31, 2024 based on secondary market quotes.

Amortization of debt issuance costs and accretion of debt discounts included in interest expense totaled $1.7 million and $2.2 million, in the years ended December 31, 2024 or 2023, respectively.

The following table outlines the future principal maturities related to the Company’s long-term debt as of December 31, 2024:

9. Leases

The Company is a party to various non-cancelable operating lease agreements for certain of its offices. The Company is a party to various non-cancelable finance lease agreements for certain network equipment. The leases have original lease periods expiring between 2025 to 2030. Some leases include one or more options to renew. The Company does not assume renewals in its determination of the lease term unless the renewals are deemed to be reasonably assured at lease commencement. The lease agreements generally do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.

The Company has elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify. For leases with an initial term of 12 months or less that do not include an option to purchase the underlying asset that the Company is reasonably certain to exercise, the Company does not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities. Instead, lease payments for short-term leases are recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Short-term lease costs for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 were $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively, and are included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

The components of lease costs, lease term and the discount rate were as follows for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:

The following table outlines future minimum lease payments under the Company’s non-cancellable leases as of December 31, 2024:

As of December 31, 2024, the Company does not have any operating and/or finance leases, which have not yet commenced. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company recorded a full impairment of its ROU asset, resulting in an impairment charge of $11.5 million. Subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company settled the obligation for the lease (see Note 19, Subsequent Events).

Supplemental cash flow information related to leases for the year ended December 31, 2024 is as follows:

10. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters

The Company is a party to certain claims, suits, and proceedings which arise in the ordinary course and conduct of its business and has certain unresolved claims pending, the outcomes of which are not determinable at this time. The Company records a liability when it believes that it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If the Company determines that a loss is reasonably possible and the loss or range of loss can be reasonably estimated, the Company discloses the possible loss or range of loss. In the Company’s opinion, resolution of pending matters, other than as disclosed herein, is not expected to have a material adverse impact on the results of operations, cash flows, or the Company’s financial position, as of December 31, 2024. Given the unpredictable nature of legal proceedings, there is a reasonable possibility that an unfavorable resolution of one or more such proceedings could in the future materially affect the results of operations, cash flows, or financial position in a particular period. However, based on the information known by the Company, except as set forth herein, any such amount is either immaterial or it is not possible to provide an estimated range of any such possible loss. The Company records legal fee expenses associated with such matters when the relevant services are provided.

Former Employee

On May 15, 2019, a former employee of the Company filed a suit against the Company in the San Francisco Superior Court in California for claims including breach of contract, retaliation and wrongful termination. The case was tried in August and September 2021. The jury found in favor of the former employee and rendered a verdict against the Company for $11.6 million in compensatory damages, and the Company recorded a loss contingency accrual of $7.1 million and corresponding general and administrative expenses in such amount in the third quarter of 2021. In April 2022, the judge in the case determined, in light of the Company’s post-verdict motions, that the instructions given to the jury at trial were defective. Accordingly, the judge ordered a new trial on damages or, alternatively, permitted the plaintiff to accept a reduced verdict in the amount of $4.4 million, which the plaintiff subsequently levied from the Company’s bank account. On May 25, 2022, the Company filed an appeal from the judgment seeking, in part, entry of judgment in the Company's favor notwithstanding the verdict. The plaintiff accepted the reduced verdict, and filed an appeal from the judgment on June 7, 2022, seeking in part, to reinstate the jury's original verdict (or an award less than the original verdict but greater than the $4.4 million final judgment) and challenge the trial court’s conclusion that stock options are not “wages,” which was the basis for dismissing his wrongful termination and retaliation claims. Skillz filed its response and reply brief on July 7, 2023. On April 8, 2024, the Court of Appeals issued its decision, affirming the judgment of $4.4 million, with an additional $2.3 million for a total award of $6.7 million. The Court of Appeals also affirmed the dismissal of the wrongful termination and retaliation claims, holding that stock options are not wages. The Court of Appeal’s decision became final, non-appealable and enforceable on May 20, 2024.

On October 11, 2024, the Court issued preliminary legal rulings on post-judgment interest and ordered parties to meet and confer to determine whether an agreement could be reached. The Company and former employee agreed that post-judgment interest of $733 thousand was owed, but the Company objected to any additional amounts as requested by the former employee. On November 21, 2024, the Court adopted the amount of interest owed and denied additional amounts of post-judgment interest that the former employee claimed. On December 9, 2024, the former employee filed a Notice of Appeal challenging the Court’s denial of a substantial amount of post-judgment interest in excess of $733 thousand. On January 8, 2025, the former employee filed an Abandonment of Appeal, thereby terminating the appeal. The Company considers this matter resolved.

Vendor Disputes

Between November 2022 and March 2023, the Company and a vendor entered into several agreements in which the vendor would perform defined professional services. Of the $7.2 million in invoices from the vendor, the Company paid $3.2 million and claimed that the vendor expanded the scope of work without authorization, over billed for its services, performed poorly and unilaterally refused to perform certain agreed upon deliverables. The vendor, in turn, claimed it received proper authorization for the work it performed, completed its contracted-for tasks and that the Company breached the agreements and failed to pay outstanding invoices. The vendor sought $4.0 million in damages, plus interest, attorney fees and costs of litigation. The Company sought counterclaims from the vendors for breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and fraudulent inducement and sought approximately $15 million in damages, plus interest, attorney fees and costs of litigation. In March 2025, the vendor and the Company settled the dispute. In exchange for mutual releases of all claims, the Company paid the vendor $2.75 million (see Note 19, Subsequent Events).

In April 2022, the Company and a vendor entered an agreement to license certain rights to develop vendor branded mobile games. In consideration, the Company agreed to pay the vendor certain monetary amounts over three years and the vendor, in turn, would use good faith efforts to promote the games. In December 2024, the vendor filed a complaint in Nevada seeking damages of $1.3 million for breach of contract, failure to pay royalties and unjust enrichment. In April 2025, the Company and the vendor agreed to mediate the matter that resulted in a settlement where the Company agreed to pay the vendor $533 thousand, which represented the past due balances for year one and year two of the agreement that were fully accrued as of December 31, 2024 (see Note 19, Subsequent Events).

Termination of Operating Lease

In May 2019, the Company leased its former headquarters with a landlord, (the “Landlord”). From February 2024 to April 2025, the Landlord served demand letters and notices of default on the Company asserting that the Company failed to pay the lease obligations. In April 2025, the Company and the Landlord executed a settlement dismissing with prejudice the dispute and fully resolving the matter. In exchange for the mutual releases, the Company paid the Landlord a lump sum payment of $14.0 million. The Company recorded a loss on termination of the operating lease of $0.4 million representing the difference between the settlement amount and the carrying value of the lease obligation, which was recorded as a component of other income (expense), net in the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2024 (see Note 19, Subsequent Events).

Skillz v. AviaGames

On February 9, 2024, a federal jury in San Jose, California issued a verdict in favor of Skillz in a patent infringement action Skillz brought against a privately-held mobile gaming company, AviaGames, on April 5, 2021 (“Patent Case”). The jury found in favor of Skillz on all issues, determining AviaGames willfully infringed Skillz’s U.S. Patent No. 9,649,564, entitled “Peer-to-Peer Wagering Platform” (the “‘564 patent”) and awarding Plaintiff Skillz Platform Inc. (“Skillz”) its full damages request of $42.9 million. After the jury verdict issued, Skillz requested certain post-trial relief, including that the Court permanently enjoin AviaGames from continuing to infringe the ‘564 patent, award Skillz its attorneys’ fees due to the exceptional nature of the case, and treble the damages awarded by the jury. In addition, Skillz, along with game developer Big Run Studios, Inc. (“Big Run”), brought a separate case against AviaGames for false advertising, copyright infringement, and violations of California’s state unfair competition law in federal court in San Francisco, California (“Unfair Competition Case”). On April 13, 2024, Skillz, Big Run, and AviaGames entered into a settlement agreement with respect to both the Patent Case and Unfair Competition Case pending against AviaGames (the “Litigation Settlement”). In exchange for dismissal of both actions and other settlement terms, AviaGames agreed to pay Skillz and Big Run a total of $80.0 million. On April 12, 2024, the Company and Big Run Studio entered into a Side Letter Agreement providing that a portion of the AviaGames settlement funds allocated to Big Run Studio be utilized to repay the outstanding principal and accrued interest under the Loan and Security Agreement totaling $2.0 million (see Note 5, Balance Sheet Components).

During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company and Big Run collectively received $50.0 million from AviaGames pursuant to the settlement agreement. Of the $50.0 million received, Skillz received $48.0 million, $2.0 million of which was for settlement of the amount outstanding under the Loan and Security Agreement with Big Run. Of the $4.0 million allocated to Big Run under the Side Letter Agreement, Big Run received $2.0 million net of the settlement of the Loan and Security

Agreement. Beginning in March of 2025, AviaGames is required to pay Skillz an additional $7.5 million annually over afour-year period as royalty payments for AviaGames’ license of the ‘564 patent and its patent family; no portion of these payments are due to Big Run.

During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recorded a gain from the Litigation Settlement netting to $46.0 million consisting of the gross payment of $48.0 million less the $2.0 million received for satisfaction and settlement of the Loan and Security Agreement. The Company recorded the $7.5 million payment received in March 2025 and will record the $7.5 million payments to be received in March 2026, 2027 and 2028 as a gain upon receipt of each payment.

Skillz v. Tether Litigation

On August 29, 2025, the Company received a notice (“Notice”) from Tether indicating that Tether is terminating all of its various agreements, as amended, with the Company (the “Tether Agreements”), including the Company’s Developer Terms and Conditions of Service, as amended, effective as of September 1, 2025. The Company believes the termination notice to be invalid and in breach of Tether’s obligations under the Tether Agreements.

Following receipt of the Notice, on September 1, 2025, the Company filed suit in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief in relation to Tether’s breach of the Tether Agreements. On October 3, 2025, the Company filed a first amended complaint in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware alleging additional breaches of contract.

Hanna v. Paradise, et. al.

In March 2024, an alleged stockholder filed a putative derivative complaint, Hanna v. Paradise, et al., No. 2024-0228-KSJM, in the Delaware Court of Chancery, purportedly on behalf of Skillz Inc. (“Skillz”) against certain of Skillz’s current and former officers, directors, and certain stockholders. The complaint alleges breaches of fiduciary duties, aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duties, and unjust enrichment arising out of Skillz’s March 2021 underwritten secondary public offering. The complaint asserts that certain of the director and officer defendants breached fiduciary duties to Skillz by allegedly inappropriately selling stock as part of the public offering while in possession of material, non-public information, that the stockholder defendants aided and abetted these alleged breaches of fiduciary duties, and that all defendants were unjustly enriched by their sales in the public offering. The complaint seeks unspecified damages and restitution for Skillz from the defendants and the payment of costs and attorneys’ fees. Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on June 6, 2024. Plaintiffs responded by voluntarily dismissing 55 of the stockholder defendants but opposing the motion as to all remaining defendants. Briefing on the motion to dismiss was completed at the end of August 2024. The Court heard oral arguments on the motion to dismiss on January 7, 2025. On July 3, 2025, the Court issued a ruling converting defendants’ motion to dismiss on demand futility grounds to a motion for summary judgment and ordered limited discovery on the independence of a former Skillz director. The Court stayed consideration of defendants’ other dismissal arguments given its ultimate ruling on the demand futility issue could moot these other dismissal arguments. Further briefing in support of summary judgment on demand futility grounds is expected, but no schedule is currently in place for such briefing.

Skillz vs. Voodoo SAS et. al.

On July 1, 2024, Skillz filed suit against Voodoo SAS and two affiliate entities, Esport Newco SAS and Esport Newco US Corp. (collectively, "Voodoo") in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In its Complaint, Skillz asserts violations of the Lanham Act's prohibition of false advertising and New York's General Business Law § 349 based on, inter alia, Skillz’s allegations that Voodoo advertises its mobile games offered through the “Blitz Win Cash” application as “fair,” “skill-based,” and for “real players only” when in reality Voodoo is fixing the outcome of its tournaments through the use of computer algorithms or “bots.” On August 22, 2024, Skillz brought a motion for a preliminary injunction, and on September 18, 2024, Voodoo moved to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, to strike certain allegations. Skillz’s and Voodoo’s motions were both mooted when Skillz amended its complaint on October 2, 2024. On October 8, 2024, Skillz renewed its motion for a preliminary injunction and expedited discovery based on the amended complaint, and Voodoo moved to dismiss the amended complaint on October 16, 2024. The preliminary injunction motion and motion to dismiss are both fully briefed and awaiting decisions by the court.

Skillz vs. Papaya Gaming, Ltd., et al.

In March 2024, Skillz sued Papaya Gaming, Ltd. and Papaya Gaming, Inc. (collectively, “Papaya”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging false advertising under the Lanham Act and unfair business practices in connection with Papaya’s marketing of its mobile games as “fair” and “skill-based” despite Papaya’s deployment of algorithmic competitors (“bots”) in its games that win cash prizes for Papaya’s benefit. In June 2024, the Court denied Papaya’s motion to dismiss Skillz’s complaint in its entirety. In September 2024, Papaya filed amended counterclaims against Skillz alleging that Skillz also engaged in false advertising and unfair business practices for purportedly allowing bots in games on Skillz’s platform, defamation for Skillz’s alleged involvement in a non-profit organization that collected and published data related to customer complaints to state attorney generals related to Papaya’s and other companies’ alleged fraudulent bot use, and purported trademark and copyright infringement of design elements of certain games, among other things. In March 2025, the Court dismissed Papaya’s defamation counterclaims and severed Papaya’s intellectual property claims. Following the Court’s rulings, Papaya voluntarily dismissed its intellectual claims against Skillz. The parties have completed discovery and have submitted to the Court summary judgment filings and motions to exclude various experts. The parties are awaiting the Court’s rulings.

Lien, et al. v. Eagle Equity Partners II, LLC, et al.

On October 31, 2022, a class action was filed, Darcy Lien v. Eagle Equity Partners II, LLC, et al., Case No. 2022-0972-PAF, in the Delaware Court of Chancery against Eagle Equity Partners II, LLC and certain of the former officers and directors (the “Individual D&O Defendants”) of Flying Eagle Acquisition Corp. (“Flying Eagle”). This litigation does not name Skillz or any of Skillz’s current directors in their capacity as such. Plaintiffs allege that the Individual D&O Defendants (i) failed to exercise proper due diligence and process in connection with Flying Eagle’s transaction with Skillz and (ii) made misleading statements in Form S-4 filed with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission in connection with the transaction. Defendants filed their initial motion to dismiss on February 17, 2023. Plaintiffs then filed an amended complaint on April 12, 2023. Defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint was filed on June 2, 2023. Plaintiff’s opposition was filed July 17, 2023, and defendant’s reply was filed August 21, 2023. Oral argument was held on the motion to dismiss on January 5, 2024, and on May 29, 2024 the court denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss. In November 2024, Skillz filed suit against its insurance carrier for D&O insurance coverage and on January 17, 2025, the insurance carrier agreed to pay a total of $9,750,000 to the Company in connection with this matter’s settlement agreement. Following certain discovery, on March 27, 2025, the parties executed a term sheet to settle the action in principle for $10 million, subject to completing settlement documentation and obtaining court approval. On May 19, 2025, the parties executed a settlement stipulation, subject to Court approval. As the successor to Flying Eagle, Skillz is obligated to indemnify and pay legal costs of the Individual D&O Defendants of Flying Eagle in their capacities as such in connection with this action and, as such recorded an expense of $10 million, offset by the insurance proceeds of $9.75 million, which is reflected in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024 (see Note 19, Subsequent Events).

Indirect Taxes

The Company is subject to indirect taxes, including sales and use tax in the United States and value-add tax in certain foreign jurisdictions. The Company has indirect tax liabilities totaling$14.9 million and $11.2 million as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, associated with indirect taxes based on currently available information and assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable based on an evaluation of relevant factors. Indirect tax liabilities are adjusted considering changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing of a tax examination, further interpretation of existing tax law, or new tax law. We recognize changes to our estimate if it is estimable and probable that our position would not be sustainable upon examination by taxing authorities. Although management believes our recorded liabilities are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcomes of these matters will not be different from that which our liabilities are based on. The Company’s application of the revenue code for indirect taxes in certain jurisdictions, including those within the United States, may be challenged by taxing authorities in those jurisdictions. The Company is in the process of filing self-disclosure returns in unregistered jurisdictions. Any associated assessments may result in additional tax liabilities. The Company does not currently anticipate that any such assessments will result in a material increase in the liabilities (see Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies).

The Company is currently undergoing an examination in the State of Washington regarding its indirect tax liability.

11. Retirement Plans

401(k) Plan

The Company has a 401(k) Plan that qualifies as a deferred salary arrangement under Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the 401(k) Plan, participating employees may defer a portion of their pretax earnings and receive a matching employer contribution of up to 3% of compensation not to exceed the maximum amount allowable. For both of the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company recognized an expense under this plan of $0.4 million.

12. Common Stock Warrants

As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company had 226,786 Private Warrants outstanding. During the year ended December 31, 2024, there wereno Private Warrants exercised.

As part of the closing of FEAC’s initial public offering, FEAC completed the private sale of 501,667 warrants to FEAC’s sponsor at a purchase price of $30.00 per warrant (the “Private Warrants”). In connection with the FEAC Business Combination, FEAC’s sponsor agreed to forfeit 250,833 Private Warrants. Each Private Warrant allows the sponsor to purchaseone share of Class A common stock at $230.00 per share.

Private Warrants and the shares of Class A common stock issuable upon exercise of the Private Warrants are not transferable, assignable or sellable until 30 days after the completion of the FEAC business combination, subject to certain limited exceptions. Additionally, the Private Warrants are not non-redeemable so long as they are held by the initial purchasers or such purchasers’ permitted transferees. If the Private Warrants are held by someone other than their initial purchasers or their permitted transferees, the Private Warrants will be redeemable by the Company and exercisable by such holders on the same basis as the Public Warrants.

13. Stockholders’ Equity

Common Stock

The Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of Class A common stock and Class B common stock. The rights of the holders of Class A common stock and Class B common stock are identical, except with respect to voting and conversion. Holders of Class A common stock are entitled toone vote per share and holders of Class B common stock are entitled to 20 votes per share. Shares of Class B common stock are convertible into an equivalent number of shares of Class A common stock and generally convert into shares of Class A common stock upon transfer. Any dividends paid to the holders of Class A common stock and Class B common stock will be paid on a pro rata basis. The payment of dividends is restricted under the terms of the Company’s 2021 Senior Secured Notes. On a liquidation event, any distribution to common stockholders is made on a pro rata basis to the holders of the Class A common stock and Class B common stock.

As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the Company has authorized a total of 41.3 million shares, consisting of (i)31.3 million shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“common stock”), including 25 million shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Class A common stock”),6.3 million shares of Class B common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Class B Common Stock”), and (ii)10 million shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“preferred stock”).

Share Repurchase Program

On August 18, 2023, the Board authorized a share repurchase program (the “Share Repurchase Program”) pursuant to which the Company may repurchase, at any time or from time to time, but for a period no longer than one year from the date of authorization, shares of the Company’s Class A common stock up to an aggregate purchase price of $65.0 million. Such purchases may be made on the New York Stock Exchange or any other national securities exchange on which the common stock is then traded. The Share Repurchase Plan is pursuant to a plan pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act and/or pursuant to accelerated share repurchase arrangements, tender offers, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. On December 5, 2024, the Board reapproved the Share Repurchase Program and extended the expiration date until otherwise suspended, terminated or modified at any time for any reason by the Board.

For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company repurchased 3.1 million and 2.3 million shares, respectively under the Share Repurchase Program at a weighted average price of $6.24 and $5.62 per share, respectively, for an aggregate value of $32.3 million. Included in the 3.1 million shares purchased in the year ended December 31, 2024, is a total of 979,848 shares the Company purchased in a private transaction from two shareholders, deemed to be related parties to the Company, at $7.00 per share, a 35% premium to the Company’s share price at the time of the transaction.

14. Stock-Based Compensation

The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense recognized for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, as follows:

In the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, $72 thousand andno amount of stock-based compensation expense was capitalized as internally developed software and included in property and equipment, net.

Equity Incentive Plans

Skillz Inc. 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan

In December 2020, the Board adopted the Skillz Inc. 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2020 Plan”). The 2020 Plan became effective upon consummation of the FEAC business combination and succeeds the Company’s legacy equity incentive plans. Under the 2020 Plan, the Company may grant stock-based awards to purchase or directly issue shares of common stock to employees, directors and consultants. Options are granted at a price per share equal to the fair market value of the underlying common stock at the date of grant. Options granted are exercisable over a maximum term of 10 years from the date of grant. RSUs are also granted under the 2020 Plan. These awards typically have a cliff vesting period ofone year and continue to vest quarterly thereafter. The 2020 Plan also permits the Company to grant stock-based awards with company-performance or market-performance conditions. In connection with the closing of the FEAC business combination, the Company entered into certain option agreements that include vesting conditions contingent upon the attainment of volume weighted average price targets related to the Company’s Class A common stock on the NYSE.

As of December 31, 2024, the 2020 Plan permitted the Company to deliver up to 6,465,771 shares of common stock pursuant to awards issued under the 2020 Plan, consisting of 750,000 shares which may be of Class A and/or Class B common stock,4,597,406 shares of Class A common stock and 1,118,365 shares of Class B common stock. The total number of shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock that will be reserved and that may be issued under the 2020 Plan will automatically increase on the first trading day of each calendar year, beginning with calendar year 2021, by a number of shares equal to 5% of the total number of shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock, respectively, outstanding on the last day of the prior calendar year.

Stock Options and Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)

The following represents the activities for stock options and RSUs during the year ended December 31, 2024 (in thousands, except for share, per share, and contractual term data):

The number of RSUs granted and outstanding does not include 0.7 million of performance based RSUs the Company issued as of December 31, 2023 as these awards are not deemed granted for accounting purposes as they are subject to the Company achieving performance targets that were not met. The performance targets in 2024 were based on Net Gaming Revenue (“NGR” or GMV less prizes and other incentives paid to players) and Adjusted EBITDA. For 2023, the targets were based on Revenue After Engagement Marketing, and Adjusted EBITDA Margin. Additionally, the activity related to stock options and RSUs presented in the table above does not include the 2022 CFO RSUs and performance awards, the 2022 CEO RSUs and performance awards, and the 2021 CEO performance award, described below.

Equity award shares exercised/vested as presented in the above table are net of shares withheld to cover tax obligations on stock-based compensation.

As of December 31, 2024, unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested stock options, RSUs and performance-based RSUs was $26.2 million. Restricted stock generally vests over periods ofone toeight years. The weighted-average period over which such compensation expense will be recognized is 1.82 years.

The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised was $9.6 thousand and $0.8 million during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

No options were granted during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.

2022 Former CFO Restricted Stock Unit and Performance Award

The Company granted the Company’s former President and Chief Financial Officer (“Former CFO”) a restricted stock unit award covering shares of the Class A common stock with a grant date value equal to $15.0 million, comprised of 0.5 million restricted stock units. These grants vest 25% on the first anniversary of the Former CFO’s start date and the remainder vest in 12 substantially equal quarterly installments, in each case subject to continuous service with the Company through each applicable vesting date, provided that the grant vests in full if the Former CFO is terminated without cause following a change of control of the Company. On September 30, 2022, the number of shares became fixed, as such the restricted stock unit award was re-measured based on the fair value of an underlying share of the Class A common stock, which was equal to $10.7 million, and the Company then reclassified the liability classified award to additional paid-in capital.

In addition, the Company issued to the Former CFO a performance stock unit award covering shares of the Class A common stock with a fair value of $5.0 million as of the issuance date, comprised of 0.2 million performance stock units. Such award vests over four one-year periods, with pro-rata vesting for the first and last performance periods, in each case subject to continuous service with the Company through each applicable vesting date and the attainment of certain corporate performance goals. The Company didnot award any performance stock units for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 as the performance goals were not achieved.

On January 5, 2024, the Former CFO informed the Company of his decision to step down from his position. The grants under the 2022 CFO RSUs and performance award were forfeited in 2024.

2022 CEO Restricted Stock Unit and Performance Award

The Company granted the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) a restricted stock unit award covering shares of the Class A common stock with a grant date fair value equal to $25.9 million, comprised of 1.4 million restricted stock units. The grant was comprised of 25% time-based RSUs and 75% performance based RSUs. Such grant vests 25% on the first anniversary of January 1, 2023 and the remainder vests in 12 substantially equal quarterly installments, in each case subject to continuous service with the Company through each applicable vesting date, and with respect to performance-based RSUs, the satisfaction of the applicable performance metrics, provided that the grant vests in full if the CEO is terminated without cause following a change of control of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recognized $3.7 million in compensation expense related to this grant. As of December 31, 2024, the unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to the non-vested CEO restricted stock unit award was $6.9 million. The Company expects this cost to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average period of approximately 2.62 years.

The reduction in additional paid-in capital of $1.4 million from the issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options and release of RSUs in 2024 was associated with shares withheld to cover tax obligations on stock-based compensation related to this award in 2024.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In June 2021, the Company commenced its first offering period under the Skillz Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the Employee Stock Purchase Plan), which assists employees in acquiring a stock ownership interest in the Company and encourages them to remain in the employment of the Company. The Employee Stock Purchase Plan is intended to qualify under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Employee Stock Purchase Plan permits eligible employees to purchase common stock at a discount through payroll deductions during specified offering periods. No employee may purchase more than $25 thousand worth of stock in any calendar year. The price of shares purchased under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan is equal to 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the first or last day of the offering period, whichever is lower. The total Employee Stock Purchase plan expense for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was immaterial.

Founders’ Option Agreements

In December 2020, the Company entered into option agreements with each of the CEO and Chief Strategy Officer (“CSO”) (the “Option Agreements”) awarding them options to purchase (i)498,000 shares of Class B common stock to the CEO and (ii)102,000 shares of Class A common stock to the CSO with an exercise price of $353.60. The options will vest inthree equal increments as follows (i) one-third (1/3) of the options shall vest and become exercisable as of the date, following the grant date, that the volume weighted average price on the NYSE over a ten (10) trading day period of underlying Class A common stock (“VWAP”) equals or exceeds 3.0 x the VWAP of the shares as of the Closing Date (as defined in the Options Agreements), (ii) one-third (1/3) of the options shall vest and become exercisable as of the date, following the grant date, that the VWAP of the shares equals or exceeds 4.0 x the VWAP of the shares as of the Closing Date; and (iii) one-third (1/3) of the options shall vest and become exercisable as of the date, following the grant date, that the VWAP of the shares equals or exceeds 5.0 x the VWAP of the shares as of the Closing Date.

The $93.4 million grant date fair value of the Founders’ Options was estimated using a model based on multiple stock price paths developed through the use of a Monte Carlo simulation that incorporates into the valuation the possibility that the market condition targets may not be satisfied. The significant inputs to the valuation included the Class A stock price and the risk-free interest rate as of the grant date, as well as the estimated volatility of the Class A common stock. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recognized $19.5 million in compensation expense related to these grants. As of December 31, 2024, the unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to the Option Agreements was $14.8 million, which is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of 0.87 years.

15. Income Taxes

The Company has historically generated net operating losses in each of the tax jurisdictions in which it operates and has provided a valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets due to uncertainties regarding the Company’s ability to realize these assets.

The loss before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 consisted of the following:

The provision for income taxes consists of the following:

A reconciliation of the Company’s effective tax rate to the statutory U.S. Federal rate of 21% is as follows:

Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of loss and credit carryforwards and temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities for federal and state income taxes are as follows:

A valuation allowance is required to be established when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon future earnings, the timing and amount of which are uncertain. A full review of all positive and negative evidence needs to be considered. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company has provided a full valuation allowance on its net deferred tax assets. The change in total valuation allowance from 2023 to 2024 was an increase of $4.2 million.

The Company had net operating loss carryforwards for U.S. Federal and state income tax purposes of approximately $626.6 million and $236.8 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2024. The U.S. Federal and state net operating loss carryforwards, if not utilized, will expire beginning in 2033 and 2032, respectively. $590.2 million of the U.S. Federal net operating loss carryforwards are not subject to expiration. Utilization of some of the U.S. Federal and state net operating loss and credit carryforwards may be subject to annual limitations due to the “change in ownership” provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and similar state provisions. The annual limitations may result in the expiration of net operating losses and credits before utilization. The Company has performed a Section 382 study as of December 31, 2024 and does not expect any net operating losses to expire unused due to Section 382 limitations.

The Company files tax returns in the U.S. and various local, state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is not currently under examination in any of these jurisdictions and all its tax years remain open to examination due to net operating loss carryforwards. The Company does not have any material reserves for uncertain tax positions.

16. Related-Party Transactions

On December 10, 2024, the Company entered into Share Repurchase Agreements (the “Share Repurchase Agreements”) with Wildcat Capital Management, LLC and Wildcat Partner Holdings, LP (the “Wildcat Parties”). Prior to the transaction, the Wildcat Parties owned more than 6% of our Class A Common Stock in the aggregate. Pursuant to the Share Repurchase Agreements, the Company agreed to repurchase 961,532 shares of its Class A Common Stock from Wildcat Partner Holdings, LP at a price of $7.00 per share, for a total purchase price of $6.7 million, and 18,316 shares of its Class A Common Stock from Wildcat Capital Management, LLC at a price of $7.00 per share, for a total purchase price of $0.1 million (collectively, the

“Share Repurchase Transactions”), which in the aggregate comprised all of the shares of Class A Common Stock beneficially owned by the Wildcat Parties. The Share Repurchase Agreements contain customary representations and warranties, and closed on December 10, 2024.

At a repurchase price of $7.00 per share, the shares of Class A Common Stock were repurchased at a 35% premium to the Company’s share price at the time of the transaction. The Company recorded the purchase price of the Share Repurchase Transactions as treasury stock.

In December 2024, in light of interest shown by certain institutional shareholders to sell their shares back to the Company, including the Wildcat Parties, the Board formed a special transactions committee comprised solely of independent directors (the “Special Transactions Committee”). The Special Transactions Committee was charged with evaluating and approving any share repurchases from such institutional investors.

Aside from Share Repurchase Transactions and the Executive grants discussed in Note 14, Stock-Based Compensation, the Company did not have any other significant related party transactions during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.

17. Segment Reporting

Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision-making group (the “CODM”). Our CODM consists of the Chief Executive Officer who allocates resources and measures profitability based on our operating segments, which are managed and reviewed separately, as each represents products and services that can be sold separately to our customers. The CODM does not review information regarding total assets on a reportable segment basis.

A description of the Company’stwo reportable segments, as determined by our CODM, is as follows:

•Skillz: Skillz is a leading eSports gaming platform. Its platform enables game developers to monetize their content through multi-player competition. By utilizing Skillz’ monetization services, developers can enhance their end-user experiences by enabling them to compete in head-to-head matches, live tournaments, and leagues while also increasing player retention through referral bonus programs, loyalty perks, on-system achievements, and rewards / prizes. Skillz provides its monetization services to developers via a downloadable SDK. The SDK integrates with developers’ existing games. Monetization services include end-user registration, player matching, fraud & fair play monitoring, and settlement for player billings and payouts. Skillz is headquartered in Las Vegas, NV with an office in Bangalore, India and presence in San Francisco, CA.

•Aarki: Aarki is an AI company that delivers advertising solutions to drive revenue growth for mobile app developers. Aarki enables brands to effectively engage audiences in a privacy-first world by using billions of contextual bidding signals coupled with proprietary machine learning and behavioral models. Aarki works with hundreds of advertisers globally and manages millions of mobile ad requests per second from over 10 billion devices. Aarki is headquartered in San Francisco, CA, with offices in Europe, the Middle East and Asia. In connection with the spin-off of Aarki in the third quarter of 2023 (see Note 3, Spin-Off Transaction), an Aarki Board of Directors was established on August 31, 2023. Two of thethree Aarki Board seats are held by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and an independent member of the Board of the Company. The Company’s CODM received discrete Aarki financial information on a regular basis for purposes of evaluating its operating performance and allocating resources beginning in the fourth quarter of 2023. Effective in the fourth quarter 2023, Aarki met the definition of an operating segment as defined in ASC 280, Segment Reporting (“ASC 280”)

The Company’s corporate operations primarily support Skillz and are included in the results for the Skillz segment. Likewise, Aarki largely has its own corporate operations, which are included in the Aarki segment.

For the Skillz Segment, end user engagement marketing represents the cost of incentives provided to end users such as Bonus Cash and Ticketz. Paid acquisition spend represents amounts paid to third parties to promote the Skillz platform. Headcount expenses include salaries, bonuses, contractors, travel, and burden such as employer taxes, benefits and insurance. Consulting fees represent expenses paid for professional fees. Vendor/Software expenses represent fees paid for the Company’s annual audit and tax advisors, software and server costs and third party technical support. Legal fees (non-litigation) represents legal expenses that relate to contract negotiations, securities law, compliance and lawsuits that do not relate to the Company’s lawsuits against AviaGames, Papaya (see Note 10. Commitments and Contingencies) and a third competitor. Litigation expenses include legal expenses incurred where the Company is pursuing damages against AviaGames and Papaya (see Note 10. Commitments and Contingencies) and a third competitor for unfair business practices and their use of ‘bots’. Office and operations expenses represent rent and building maintenance. Other segment items include marketing expenses which, in turn, consists mostly affiliate marketing, state and corporate fees, fines and penalties and trade shows.

For the Aarki Segment, operating expenses include all operating expenses such as headcount, marketing, software, professional fees such as legal, audit and tax compliance and rent.

For both the Skillz and Aarki segments, stock-based compensation expenses are not included in operating expenses.

The following tables provide summarized information about the Company’s operations by reportable segment and a reconciliation of Segment Adjusted EBITDA to Net Loss for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.

(1)Includes impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets related to one of the Company’s investments in non-marketable securities of a privately held company on account of significant concerns related to the private company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

(2)Amount represents the settlement of a litigation matter relating to a former employee as discussed in Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies.

(3)Amount represents a gain on a legal settlement recorded in connection with proceeds under terms of a settlement agreement entered into with Avia Games in connection with certain bot misuse litigation as discussed in Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies.

The following tables provide summarized information about the Company’s operations used by the CODM by reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Transactions Between Segments

Intercompany revenue was $0.5 million and $0.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Beginning September 1, 2023, Aarki entered into an agreement with Skillz whereby Aarki will reimburse Skillz for shared services on a monthly basis. The amount paid for the years ended December 21, 2024 and 2023 were not material.

Capital Expenditures

Consolidated capital expenditures were $2.5 million and $13.2 million in the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Capital expenditures in 2024 consisted primarily of costs related to internal-use software. Capital expenditures in 2023 consisted primarily of the acquisition of the Company’s headquarters by the Skillz segment in the amount of $11.5 million.

18. Net Loss Per Share

The Company computes net loss per share of the Class A common stock and Class B common stock using the two-class method required for participating securities. Basic and diluted loss per share are the same for each class of common stock as they are entitled to the same liquidation and dividend rights. The effect of potentially dilutive common shares is reflected in diluted loss per share by application of the treasury stock method. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per Class A common stock and Class B common stock (in thousands, except for share and per share data).

The following outstanding common stock equivalents were considered antidilutive; and therefore, excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders for the periods presented (share numbers are not in thousands):

19. Subsequent Events

Lease in Bangalore, India

On February 3, 2025, the Company entered into a letter of intent to lease space in an office building in Bangalore, India. The lease commenced on August 18, 2025 for a term of 36 months. The lease payment is approximately $35.7 thousand per month, plus applicable taxes with an annual escalation of 6% per annum.

License Agreement Dispute

On April 1, 2022, the Company entered into an agreement with a holder of intellectual property (the “Partner”) pursuant to which the Company would develop and market mobile games with the Partner’s brand and the Partner would use “good faith efforts” to promote the games. In consideration, the Company would pay the Partner minimum royalties totaling $1.5 million, but not to exceed $2.0 million, of which $0.5 million had been accrued as of December 31, 2024. The Company contended that the Partner failed to provide good faith efforts to market and, as a result withheld royalty payments. The Partner contended that the Company was in breach of the agreement due to non-payment of royalty payments. The Partner served the Company a complaint on January 14, 2025. In April 2025, the Partner and the Company agreed to attend mediation on this matter and settled the matter for a payment of $0.5 million to the Partner in June 2025 (see Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies).

Vendor Disputes

Between November 2022 and March 2023, the Company and a vendor entered into several agreements in which the vendor would perform defined professional services. Of the $7.2 million in invoices from the vendor, the Company paid $3.2 million and claimed that the vendor expanded the scope of work without authorization, over billed for its services, performed poorly and unilaterally refused to perform certain agreed upon deliverables. The vendor, in turn, claimed it received proper authorization for the work it performed, completed its contracted-for tasks and that the Company breached the agreements and failed to pay outstanding invoices. The vendor sought $4.0 million in damages, plus interest, attorney fees and costs of litigation. The Company sought counterclaims from the vendors for breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and fraudulent inducement and is sought approximately $15 million in damages, plus interest, attorney fees and costs of litigation. In March 2025, the vendor and the Company settled the dispute. In exchange for mutual releases of all claims, the Company paid the vendor $2.75 million (see Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies).

In April 2022, the Company and a vendor entered an agreement to license certain rights to develop vendor branded mobile games. In consideration, the Company agreed to pay the vendor certain monetary amounts over three years and the vendor, in turn, would use good faith efforts to promote the games. In December 2024, the vendor filed a complaint in Nevada seeking damages of $1.3 million for breach of contract, failure to pay royalties and unjust enrichment. In April 2025, the Company and the vendor agreed to mediate the matter that resulted in a settlement where the Company agreed to pay the vendor $533 thousand, which represented the past due balances for year one and year two of the agreement that were fully accrued as of December 31, 2024 (see Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies).

Termination of Operating Lease

On April 18, 2025, the Company and the lessor of its former headquarters in San Francisco mutually agreed to terminate the lease. In exchange for the mutual releases, the Company paid the lessor a lump sum payment of $14,000,000. The loss on termination of the operating lease of $0.4 million represented the difference between the settlement amount and the carrying value of the lease obligation, and was recorded as a component of other income (expense), net in the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Recovery of Legal Settlement

Subsequent to the year ending December 31, 2024, the D&O insurance carrier of the Flying Eagle legal matter (see Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies) agreed to pay a total of $9.75 million to Skillz in connection with this matter. Of those funds, $1.25 million was received in the quarter ending March 31, 2025 and was used to pay defense costs. During the quarter ended June 30, 2025, Skillz received the remaining $8.50 million. In July 2025, the Company paid a settlement $10.00 million on the Flying Eagle legal matter which the court approved in September 2025. The Company recorded the insurance recovery proceeds as an offset to general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2024 (see Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies).

Skillz v. Tether Litigation

On August 29, 2025, the Company received a notice (“Notice”) from Tether indicating that Tether is terminating all of its various agreements with the Company (the “Tether Agreements”), including the Company’s Developer Terms and Conditions of Service, as amended from time to time, including by that certain Amendment to Skillz Online Developer Terms and

Conditions of Service, dated January 15, 2020, effective as of September 1, 2025. The Company believes the termination notice to be invalid and in breach of Tether’s obligations under the Tether Agreements.

Following receipt of the Notice, on September 1, 2025, the Company filed suit in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief in relation to Tether’s breach of the Tether Agreements. On October 3, 2025, the Company filed a first amended complaint in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware alleging additional breaches of contract (see Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies).

Purchase of Treasury Stock

On August 18, 2023, the Board authorized the Company to repurchase, at any time or from time to time but for a period no longer than one year from the date of authorization, shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Common Stock”), having an aggregate purchase price not to exceed $65.0 million (a) on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) or any other national securities exchange on which the Common Stock is then traded, (b) pursuant to a plan effected pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 (a “Rule 10b5-1 Plan”) promulgated under the Exchange Act, and/or (c) pursuant to accelerated share repurchase arrangements, tender offers, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise (the “Share Repurchase Program”). On December 5, 2024, the Board reapproved the Share Repurchase Program and extended the expiration date until otherwise suspended, terminated or modified at any time for any reason by the Board.

Subsequent to December 31, 2024 through November 3, 2025, the Company has repurchased 1.4 million shares of its common stock under the Share Repurchase Program (see Note 13, Stockholders Equity) at an average price of $5.39 share for a total cost (including commission) of $7.7 million.

Skillz v. Papaya Litigation

On October 28, 2025, the court denied Papaya’s motion for summary judgment as to Skillz’s claims against Papaya. The Court also denied Papaya’s motion to exclude Skillz’s consumer survey and damages experts. The court’s rulings on Skillz’ motion for summary judgment as to Papaya’s counterclaims against Skillz, and Papaya’s experts are still pending(see Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies).

New Tax Law

On July 4, 2025, U.S. Congress enacted the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”), which includes significant provision, including tax cut extensions and modifications to the international tax framework. In accordance with GAAP, the Company will account for the tax effects of changes in tax law in the period of enactment, which is in the quarter ending September 30, 2025. The Company is in the process of analyzing the impacts of the law change, and it currently does not expect the OBBBA to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Notice of Default

In light of the delays in the filing of the Company’s annual financial statements on this Form 10-K and the interim financial statements on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2025, on September 30, 2025, the Company received a notice of default (the “Notice of Default”) from UMB Bank, N.A., as trustee (the “Trustee”) under that certain Indenture, dated as of December 20, 2021, between the Company, each of the guarantors party thereto and the Trustee (“Indenture”), pertaining to the Company’s outstanding 2021 Senior Secured Notes. The Notice of Default provided that the Company was not in compliance under the terms of the Indenture as a result of the Company’s failure to timely provide the required quarterly and annual reports within the time periods required under the Exchange Act. Pursuant to the terms of the Indenture, the receipt of the Notice of Default will not result in an Event of Default (as such term is defined under the Indenture) unless the Company remains out of compliance with this reporting covenant for 120 days following receipt of the Notice of Default.

Pursuant to the Indenture, the Company will be deemed to regain compliance with these reporting covenants if it provides all applicable delayed filings within 120 days of receipt of the Notice of Default. The filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K constitutes compliance with a portion of reporting covenant under the Indenture, and the Company is further taking the necessary steps to file its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2025 as soon as practicable, in order to regain compliance with the terms of the Indenture.