Skip to main content

First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc.

For the period ended Dec 28, 2025. Filed Feb 24, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2025 · Filed Feb 24, 2026

FWRG$13.44-3.0%Stored close · as of Nov 10, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc.

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of First Watch Restaurant Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 28, 2025 and December 29, 2024, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, of equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 28, 2025, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We have also audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 28, 2025 and December 29, 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 28, 2025 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2025, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for the consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Managements’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Valuation of Insurance Reserves

As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s estimated unpaid claims and other insurance liabilities was $6.3 million as of December 28, 2025. The Company is self-insured for employee group health claims and Ohio workers’ compensation. The Company also carries retention levels and per-claim deductibles associated with other workers’ compensation and general liability insurance programs. Stop loss coverage is maintained with third-party insurers to limit loss exposure. Management records liabilities for unresolved and incurred but not reported claims at the anticipated cost below applicable retention levels or per-claim deductible amounts. Insurance reserve liabilities are established at the balance sheet date using actuarial assumptions and historical data including the frequency and severity of claims.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the valuation of insurance reserves is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management when developing the estimate of insurance reserves; (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s significant assumptions related to the frequency and severity of claims; and (iii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s valuation of insurance reserves, including controls over the development of significant assumptions. These procedures also included, among others (i) testing management’s process for developing the estimate of insurance reserves, (ii) evaluating the appropriateness of the actuarial methods used by management, (iii) evaluating the reasonableness of the significant assumptions used by management related to the frequency and severity of claims, and (iv) testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used in the valuation. Evaluating management’s assumptions related to the frequency and severity of claims involved considering (i) the consistency with external market data; and (ii) whether the assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge assisted in evaluating the reasonableness of management's estimate by (i) developing an independent estimate of insurance reserves and comparing the independent estimate to management's actuarial determined reserves, (ii) evaluating the appropriateness of management's actuarial methodologies and, (iii) evaluating the reasonableness of management's significant assumptions related to frequency and severity of claims.

Acquisition of Franchise Operated First Watch Restaurants on April 28, 2025 – Valuation of Reacquired Rights

As described in Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, on April 28, 2025, the Company acquired certain franchise operated First Watch restaurants for a net purchase price of $49.2 million. Of the assets acquired, $13.1 million of reacquired rights were recorded. The fair value of reacquired rights is determined as of the acquisition date by management using the excess earnings method. Under this method, the fair value is determined based on estimated future cash flows arising from the reacquired rights over their estimated economic lives. The assumptions that have the most significant effect on the fair value calculations are projected Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (“EBIT”) margins and the discount rate.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the valuation of reacquired rights acquired in the acquisition of franchise operated First Watch restaurants on April 28, 2025 is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management when developing the fair value estimate of the reacquired rights intangible asset acquired; (ii) a high degree of auditor judgment and effort in performing procedures and evaluating management’s significant assumptions related to the projected EBIT margins and the discount rate; and (iii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the acquisition accounting, including controls over management’s valuation of the reacquired rights intangible asset acquired. These procedures also included, among others, (i) reading the purchase agreement; (ii) testing management’s process for developing the fair value estimate of the reacquired rights intangible asset acquired; (iii) evaluating the appropriateness of the excess earnings method used by management; (iv) testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used in the excess earnings method; and (v) evaluating the reasonableness of the significant assumptions used by management related to the projected EBIT margins and the discount rate. Evaluating management’s assumptions related to projected EBIT margins involved considering (i) the current and past performance of the franchisee’s franchise locations; (ii) the consistency with the historical performance of the Company’s existing restaurants; and (iii) whether the assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in evaluating (i) the appropriateness of the excess earnings method and (ii) the reasonableness of the discount rate assumption.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Tampa, Florida

February 24, 2026

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1999.

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.