Sadot Group Inc.

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are a defendant or plaintiff in various legal actions that arise in the normal course of business. We record legal costs associated with loss contingencies as incurred and have accrued for all probable and estimable settlements.

Lombard Trading International Corp. commenced two related proceedings against Sadot Latam, LLC and the Company and in the 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida (Case No.: 2024-020971-CA-01 & 2025-021675-CA-01). In each case, plaintiff alleges a breach of contract claim related to an agricultural commodities transaction against Sadot Latam, LLC and seeks damages in the approximate amount of $7.4 million and $17 million, respectively. The plaintiff also alleges an alter ego and contract guaranty claim against the Company related to the alleged breach of contract. The original claims have been substantially narrowed through the Company’s successful motions practice. The Company denies the allegations and has filed its Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaim, asserting a counterclaim of approximately $1.6 million against the plaintiff for amounts paid by the Company for which no goods were delivered. The Company has also filed a motion to dismiss the alter ego and contract guaranty claims. While the Company believes it has meritorious defenses, it cannot predict the outcome of this matter or reasonably estimate the range of potential loss at this time. Based on the assessment of the Company’s legal counsel, a loss in respect of the plaintiff’s claim is reasonably possible but not probable, and the amount or range of potential loss cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. Accordingly, no contingent liability has been accrued in accordance with ASC 450 as of March 31, 2026.

In August 2023, the Company closed on the acquisition of approximately 5,000 acres of farmland in the Mkushi Region of Zambia through Sadot Zambia. Sadot Zambia is 100% owned by Sadot Enterprises Limited, which is 70% owned by Sadot LLC. On December 11, 2025, the High Court for Zambia (Commercial Division) delivered a judgment in the case of Cropit Farming Limited v. Sadot LLC (2025/HPC/0184). The Court declared the Pre-Conditional Offer Agreement, the Purchase of Receivables and Validation Agreement, and the Joint Venture Agreement between the parties to be invalid, non-binding, and unenforceable. As a result, the Company, has lost possession, control, and ownership of approximately 5,000 acres of farmland in Mkushi, Zambia, which had been placed in escrow pursuant to the invalidated agreements. The Court dismissed Cropit Farming Limited’s claims for monetary damages but ordered Sadot LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, to pay Cropit Farming Limited’s litigation costs. The Company’s counterclaims were also dismissed. The Company has filed an appeal seeking recovery of $3.5 million. The appeal process is expected to take in excess of one year. There is no guarantee that the Company will be successful in such appeal. While the Court has ordered the Company to pay Cropit Farming Limited’s litigation costs, the amount of such costs has not yet been determined. Accordingly, no liability has been accrued as of March 31, 2026, as the amount of the obligation is not reasonably estimable.

Zen-Noh Grain Corporation commenced commodity arbitration proceedings against Sadot Group Inc. and Sadot Latam LLC claiming non-delivery under a grain sales contract. The Company denies liability on the basis that Sadot Group Inc. was not a party to the underlying contract and that Sadot Latam LLC performed its obligations. . A further final round of submissions was allowed by the Tribunal, the final of which will be made in May 2026 by the Claimant. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses, including jurisdictional grounds for dismissal of the claim against Sadot Group Inc., but the outcome of arbitration proceedings is inherently uncertain and cannot be predicted. Based on the assessment of the Company’s legal counsel, a loss is reasonably possible but not probable, and the amount or range of potential loss cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. Accordingly, no contingent liability has been accrued in accordance with ASC 450 as of March 31, 2026.

Kevin Mohan v Sadot Group Inc., formerly Muscle Maker, Inc. (AAA Case No. 01-25-0003- 4507). Former Chairman’s employment claims under Texas law exceeding $0.3 million (excluding unvested stock). The Claimant failed to pay the arbitrator’s deposit. The arbitration was suspended on 5 March 2026 (Preliminary Order No. 3) and terminated without prejudice on 31 March 2026 (Preliminary Order No. 4, Arbitrator John Allen Chalk, Sr.) pursuant to AAA Rule 56(d). No award was made and no liability was determined. The Claimant retains the right to refile until approximately March 2029 (limitation). It is too early to assess whether there would be a continuation to this claim, resulting in a loss and even if there was a loss the amount of such a loss cannot be estimated. On April 2, 2026, Mr. Mohan filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Texas alleging breaches of employment contract and damages in the amount greater than $250,000 and less than $1,000,000 relating to alleged unpaid performance bonuses. The Company believes the plaintiffs’ positions are without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself in all respects. No contingent liability has been recorded as of March 31, 2026.

Nuval Trade S.A. v. Sadot Latam LLC (GAFTA No. 19-403) is a GAFTA arbitration arising from two soybean meal contracts. On April 17, 2026, a partial award was issued in favor of Nuval Trade S.A. against Sadot Latam LLC (not Sadot Group Inc.). The award relates to contracts dated February 27, 2024 and April 9, 2024, and grants approximately $12.0 million in damages. In addition, the award provides for interest at 5% per annum, compounded quarterly, on approximately $11.1 million from August 13, 2024 and on approximately $1.0 million from February 11, 2025 until the date of payment, as well as reimbursement of Nuval’s legal fees and arbitration costs. As of March 31, 2026, the total estimated liability, including interest and costs, was approximately $12.9 million, which has been accrued.

The Andersons, Inc. v Sadot LLC. On September 26, 2025, The Andersons, Inc. filed an admiralty and maritime action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in aid of a arbitration proceeding against the Company’s subsidiaries, Sadot LLC and Sadot Latam, alleging breach of a contract for the sale of Argentine wheat and seeking approximately $521,641 plus alleged dispatch, pre-award interest, and other fees. In February 2026, The Andersons initiated a related GAFTA arbitration against the same parties. On March 9, 2026, The Andersons amended its complaint to add the Company as a defendant. The Company intends to defend these claims. Based on the assessment of the Company’s legal counsel, a loss is reasonably possible, but not probable, and the amount or range of any potential loss cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. Accordingly, no contingent liability has been accrued under ASC 450 as of March 31, 2026.

Star Fund commenced proceedings alleging that Sadot Group Inc. guaranteed Sadot Latam LLC’s obligations under a factoring agreement and claiming approximately $2.9 million. The claim against Sadot Group Inc. was based solely on a 2023 board resolution authorizing management to guarantee subsidiary debt with specified lenders. No executed guaranty document exists and Star Fund was not named in the resolution. The guaranty count was dismissed by agreement on December 9, 2025. A motion for summary judgment by a codefendant was heard on February 25, 2026 and remains under advisement. Following the dismissal by agreement of the guaranty count on December 9, 2025, the only count remaining against Sadot Group Inc. is a derivative unjust enrichment claim, in respect of which the Company maintains it has meritorious defenses on the basis that no executed guaranty document exists, no benefit was received by Sadot Group Inc., and Star Fund was not a party identified in the underlying 2023 board resolution. The matter remains pending against Sadot Group Inc. and Sadot Latam LLC. Based on the assessment of the Company’s legal counsel, a loss in respect of the residual claim against Sadot Group Inc. is reasonably possible but not probable, and the amount or range of potential loss cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. Accordingly, no contingent liability has been accrued in accordance with ASC 450 as of March 31, 2026.

Rocket Capital NY LLC v. Sadot Latam LLC. The plaintiff commenced proceedings in connection with a merchant cash advance arrangement entered into by Sadot Latam LLC. The claim is against Sadot Latam LLC only. The matter is at a preliminary stage. The Company denies the allegations and will defend the proceedings. Based on the assessment of the Company’s legal counsel, a loss is reasonably possible but not probable, and the amount or range of potential loss cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. Accordingly, no contingent liability has been accrued in accordance with ASC 450 as of March 31, 2026.

Centurion MPP Pte. Ltd. v. Sadot Latam LLC. The claimant commenced proceedings in Singapore arising out of an alleged breach of a commodity sale and purchase contract. The claim is against Sadot Latam LLC only. The matter is at a preliminary stage. The Company denies the allegations and will defend the proceedings. Based on the assessment of the Company’s legal counsel, a loss is reasonably possible but not probable, and the amount or range of potential loss cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. Accordingly, no contingent liability has been accrued in accordance with ASC 450 as of March 31, 2026.

OSR Rotterdam BV filed a maritime attachment claim against Sadot Latam LLC on April 14, 2025 arising from an alleged breach of a charter party. OSR claims a contractual cancellation fee of $250,000 plus interest. The Company has recorded $250,000 within accounts payable as of March 31, 2026 in respect of the principal claim. Based on the assessment of the Company’s legal counsel, a loss is probable and the principal amount has been accrued; the amount of any further interest, costs, and enforcement charges in excess of the accrued sum cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.

On April 4, 2026, a former employee of the Company filed a complaint against the Company and its chief executive officer in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging breaches of employment contract and damages in the amount of $144,212 plus punitive damages relating to alleged unpaid performance bonuses, vacation time, and severance. The Company believes the plaintiffs’ positions are without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself in all respects. In early May 2026 the employee agreed to dismiss the complaint and move to an arbitration in Texas.

On February 18, 2026, Lisiten Associates Inc. filed a complaint against the Company in the Supreme Cout of the State of New York, County of New York, alleging unpaid brokerage fees in connection with the sale of the Company’s restaurant business in the amount of $319,000 plus treble damages. The Company believes the plaintiffs’ positions are without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself in all respects.

In the normal course of business, the Company may be involved in legal proceedings, claims and assessments arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management after consulting legal counsel, such matters are currently not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

The Company records legal costs associated with loss contingencies as incurred and accrues for all probable and estimable settlements after consulting legal counsel.