Insight Molecular Diagnostics Inc.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Mar 26, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Mar 26, 2026
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID No.199)
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Insight Molecular Diagnostics Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2025, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2025 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Contingent consideration – Fair valuation of contingent consideration liabilities
As described in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company reported certain contingent consideration liabilities at their estimated fair value as of year-end. The Company used a discounted cash flow model, which is an income approach, in determining the fair value of the contingent consideration liabilities.
The principal consideration for our determination that the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities is a critical audit matter is that there is significant judgment by management in estimating possible future payouts, the discount rate, and the likelihood of certain milestones being met. This in turn led to high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing audit procedures in evaluating audit evidence related to management’s estimates and assumptions used in the valuation model. Furthermore, evaluating the related audit evidence required significant auditor judgment as the nature of the evidence is highly subjective, and audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skills and knowledge to assist in evaluating the audit evidence obtained.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating evidence in connection with forming our overall audit opinion on the financial statements. These procedures included (i) evaluating the methodology management used to develop its estimate, (ii) testing the significant inputs and assumptions to management’s estimate, and (iii) involving the use of auditor-employed valuation specialists in assessing the estimate.
Intangible assets – Impairment of certain indefinite-lived intangible assets
As described in Note 5 to the financial statements, the Company recognized impairment expense related to its indefinite-lived intangible assets. The Company used a multi-period excess earnings method, which is an income approach, to determine the fair value of the intangible assets in such evaluation.
The principal consideration for our determination that the impairment evaluation is a critical audit matter is that there is significant judgment by management in estimating forecasted cash flows and assumptions such as the discount rate. This in turn led to high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing audit procedures in evaluating audit evidence related to management’s estimates and assumptions used in the forecasted cash flows and valuation model. Furthermore, evaluating the audit evidence related to impairment evaluation required significant auditor judgment as the nature of the evidence is highly subjective.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating evidence in connection with forming our overall audit opinion on the financial statements. These procedures included (i) developing an independent estimate of the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible assets and comparing it to management’s own estimate.
/s/CBIZ CPAs P.C.
CBIZ CPAs P.C.
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2023 (such date takes into account the acquisition of the attest business of Marcum LLP by CBIZ CPAs P.C. effective November 1, 2024).
Costa Mesa, CA
March 26, 2026
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID No. 688)
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Insight Molecular Diagnostics Inc., formerly known as Oncocyte Corporation, (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock and shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/Marcum LLP
Marcum LLP
We served as the Company’s auditor from 2023 through 2025.
Costa Mesa, CA
March 24, 2025
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.