Q/C TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

TNF Pharmaceuticals. Inc. and Subsidiaries

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of TNF Pharmaceuticals. Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024 and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Substantial Doubt About the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has experienced a net loss and negative cash flows from operations for the year ended December 31, 2024, which raises substantial doubt about their ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of their internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Valuation of preferred stock and bifurcated embedded derivative

As discussed in Notes 1 and 2 to the consolidated financial statements, on February 21, 2023, the Company sold 15,000 shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series F Preferred Stock”), with various embedded features. The Preferred Stock was determined to be more akin to a debt-like host than an equity-like host. The Company concluded that the embedded features were not clearly and closely related to the debt host instrument and thus were deemed to be bifurcated embedded derivatives (“Embedded Derivative”). The Embedded Derivative liabilities are measured at fair value at inception and then are required to be re-measured and reported at fair value at each reporting period. Management’s estimate of the Embedded Derivative liabilities as of December 31, 2024 was $0. On April 8, 2025, the Company entered into an Omnibus Amendment Agreement with the Series F Preferred Stock holders, which amended certain terms of the Certificate of Designations surrounding the Stated Value, the timing and amount of installment redemptions and the final maturity date of the Series F Preferred Stock. This amendment resulted in an extinguishment of the original instrument and reissuance of Series F Preferred Stock on December 31, 2024. The estimated fair value of the Series F Preferred Stock at December 31, 2024 reissuance was $4,930,000.

As discussed in Notes 1 and 2 to the consolidated financial statements, on May 20, 2024, the Company sold 5,050 shares of Series F-1 Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series F-1 Preferred Stock”), with various embedded features. The Preferred Stock was determined to be more akin to a debt-like host than an equity-like host. The Company concluded that the embedded features were not clearly and closely related to the debt host instrument and thus were deemed to be bifurcated embedded derivatives (“Embedded Derivative”). The Embedded Derivative liabilities are measured at fair value at inception and then are required to be re-measured and reported at fair value at each reporting period. Management’s estimate of the Embedded Derivative liabilities at inception and as of December 31, 2024 was $854,000 and $1,303,000. The estimated fair value of the Series F-1 Preferred Stock at issuance was $9,323,000.

As discussed in Notes 1 and 2 to the consolidated financial statements, on May 20, 2024, the Company sold 8,950 shares of Series G Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series G Preferred Stock”). The estimated fair value of the Series G Preferred Stock at issuance was $22,260,000.

Management applies considerable judgment in selecting assumptions used to estimate the fair value of Preferred Stock and Embedded Derivative liabilities and changes in market conditions or variations in certain assumptions could result in significant fluctuations in the estimate. Management estimates the fair value of the Preferred Stock and Embedded Derivative liabilities using a Monte Carlo simulation model, with the following inputs: the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the issuance date and re-measurement date, estimated equity volatility, estimated traded volume volatility, the time to maturity, a discounted market interest rate, a dividend rate, a penalty dividend rate, and probability of default. The fair value of the bifurcated derivative liabilities was estimated utilizing the with and without method which uses the probability weighted difference between the scenarios with the derivative and the plain vanilla maturity scenario without a derivative.

Given the inherent uncertainty in selecting assumptions and the complexity of the calculations, we have determined that management’s valuation of the Preferred Stock and Embedded Derivative liabilities is a critical audit matter which required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort when performing audit procedures to evaluate the judgments made and the reasonableness of the models and assumptions used in the valuation. The audit effort included the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained from these procedures.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included the following:

Goodwill - Assessment of Impairment

As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s goodwill balance was approximately $10.5 million. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company tests goodwill for impairment annually, or more frequently if certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of the reporting unit may be less than its carrying amount. The Company operates as a single reporting unit and performed its annual impairment test as of December 31, 2024, using both qualitative and quantitative approaches. The Company’s assessment included consideration of a third-party valuation and a recent equity financing transaction. The results of these analyses, along with various mitigating factors, were evaluated to determine if goodwill impairment was necessary.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the impairment assessment for goodwill is a critical audit matter is the significant judgment by management in making the qualitative and quantitative assessment of whether goodwill was impaired. This in turn led to significant auditor judgment in assessing whether the fair value of the reporting unit exceeded its carrying amount, particularly given the pre-revenue status of the Company, its reliance on ongoing research and development activities, and its low market capitalization relative to book value.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included the following:

Going Concern Assessment

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, historically, the Company has incurred net losses. Since its inception, the Company has met its liquidity requirements principally through the sale of its preferred and common stock in public and private placements. The Company believes that its current financial resources as of the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements are not sufficient to fund its current operating budget and contractual obligations as of December 31, 2024 as they fall due in the next twelve-month period, and as such have concluded that there are material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. In making such a determination, management prepared a short-term cash flow projection. Management used significant assumptions in preparing the short-term cash flow projection, which included operating costs and financing obligations.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the going concern assessment is a critical audit matter are the significant judgments in management’s plans to fund its operating budget and contractual obligations. This required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort when performing audit procedures to evaluate management’s conclusion that it is probable the Company’s plans will be effectively implemented within twelve months after the date the consolidated financial statements are issued and will provide the necessary cash flows to fund the Company’s operating budget and contractual obligations.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included the following:

Investment in Oravax, Inc. - Assessment of Impairment

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has elected to measure its investment in Oravax Medical, Inc. as an equity security without a readily determinable fair value. Under this election, an equity security without a readily available fair value is reflected at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. At each reporting period, the Company is required to make a qualitative assessment considering impairment indicators to evaluate whether the investment is impaired. If deemed impaired, the Company is required to estimate the fair value of the investment and recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference between the fair value of the investment and its carry amount. As of December 31, 2024, the Company performed a qualitative assessment to evaluate whether the investment is impaired and determined that the investment was not impaired and thus no adjustment to fair market value was required as of December 31, 2024. In making such a determination, management prepared a detailed qualitative analysis considering various impairment indicators. Management used significant judgment in their qualitative assessment.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the impairment assessment of investments in equity securities without readily determinable fair value is a critical audit matter is the significant judgment by management in making the qualitative assessment of whether investments in equity securities were impaired. This in turn led to significant auditor judgment and effort in performing procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of significant judgments management applied in determining whether events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment might not be recoverable.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included the following:

/s/Stephano Slack LLC

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2024.

Wayne, Pennsylvania

April 11, 2025

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

TNF Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (formerly, MyMD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Subsidiaries

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of TNF Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (formerly, MyMD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2023 and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2023 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2023 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2023 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company has experienced a net loss and negative cash flows from operations for the year ended December 31, 2023, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Valuation of bifurcated embedded derivative

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, on February 21, 2023, the Company sold 15,000 shares of Series F Convertible Preferred Stock (“Preferred Stock”), with various embedded features. The Preferred Stock was determined to be more akin to a debt-like host than an equity-like host. The Company concluded that the embedded features were not clearly and closely related to the debt host instrument and thus were deemed to be bifurcated embedded derivatives (“Embedded Derivative”). The Embedded Derivative liabilities are measured at fair value at inception and then are required to be re-measured and reported at fair value at each reporting period. Management’s estimate of the Embedded Derivative liabilities at inception and as of December 31, 2023 was $3,149,800 and $61,000. Management applies considerable judgment in selecting assumptions used to estimate the Embedded Derivative liabilities and changes in market conditions or variations in certain assumptions could result in significant fluctuations in the estimate. Management estimates the fair value of the Embedded Derivative liabilities using a Monte Carlo simulation model, with the following inputs: the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the issuance date and re-measurement date, estimated equity volatility, estimated traded volume volatility, the time to maturity, a discounted market interest rate, a dividend rate, a penalty dividend rate, and probability of default. The fair value of the bifurcated derivative liabilities was estimated utilizing the with and without method which uses the probability weighted difference between the scenarios with the derivative and the plain vanilla maturity scenario without a derivative.

Given the inherent uncertainty in selecting assumptions and the complexity of the calculations, we have determined that management’s valuation of Embedded Derivative liabilities is a critical audit matter which required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort when performing audit procedures to evaluate the judgments made and the reasonableness of the models and assumptions used in the valuation. The audit effort included the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained from these procedures

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included the following:

Going Concern Assessment

As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, historically, the Company has incurred net losses. Since its inception, the Company has met its liquidity requirements principally through the sale of its preferred and common stock in public and private placements. The Company believes that its current financial resources as of the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements are not sufficient to fund its current operating budget and contractual obligations as of December 31, 2023 as they fall due in the next twelve-month period, and as such have concluded that there are no material uncertainties related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt upon the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. In making such a determination, management prepared a short-term cash flow projection. Management used significant assumptions in preparing the short-term cash flow projection, which included operating costs and financing obligations.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the going concern assessment is a critical audit matter are the significant judgments in management’s plans to fund its operating budget and contractual obligations. This required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort when performing audit procedures to evaluate management’s conclusion that it is probable the Company’s plans will be effectively implemented within twelve months after the date the consolidated financial statements are issued and will provide the necessary cash flows to fund the Company’s operating budget and contractual obligations.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included the following:

Assessment of Impairment for Investment in Oravax, Inc.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has elected to measure its investment in Oravax Medical, Inc. as an equity security without a readily determinable fair value. Under this election, an equity security without a readily available fair value is reflected at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. At each reporting period, the Company is required to make a qualitative assessment considering impairment indicators to evaluate whether the investment is impaired. If deemed impaired, the Company is required to estimate the fair value of the investment and recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference between the fair value of the investment and its carry amount. As of December 31, 2023, the Company performed a qualitative assessment to evaluate whether the investment is impaired and determined that the investment was not impaired and thus no adjustment to fair market value was required as of December 31, 2023. In making such a determination, management prepared a detailed qualitative analysis considering various impairment indicators. Management used significant judgment in their qualitative assessment.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the impairment assessment of investments in equity securities without readily determinable fair value is a critical audit matter is the significant judgment by management in making the qualitative assessment of whether investments in equity securities were impaired. This in turn led to significant auditor judgment and effort in performing procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of significant judgments management applied in determining whether events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment might not be recoverable.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included the following:

/s/Morison Cogen LLP

We served as the Company’s auditor from 2010 to 2024.

Blue Bell, Pennsylvania

April 1, 2024