Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Apr 8, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2024 · Filed Apr 8, 2025
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Substantial Doubt about the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company’s significant operating losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Warrant Inducement Transaction – Refer to Note 4 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
On February 16, 2024, the Company entered into an agreement with a current warrant holder to exercise the outstanding Series B Warrants (the “Inducement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Inducement, the holder agreed to exercise the Series B Warrant in full and purchase a total of 980,393 shares of common stock at a reduced price of $2.10 per share, generating total gross cash proceeds of $2,058,825.
In connection with the Inducement, the Company agreed to amend the terms of the October 2023 Series A common stock purchase warrant held by a purchaser in the offering to reduce the exercise price thereof to $1.91 per share and to extend the expiration date to February 2029. All of the other terms of the October 2023 Series A common stock purchase warrant will remain unchanged. Additionally, the Company issued to the investor unregistered Series B-1 Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 735,295 shares of common stock and Series B-2 Warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 735,295 shares of common stock. The Series B-1 and Series B-2 Warrants will have an exercise price of $1.91 per share, will be exercisable immediately following the date of issuance and will expire in 5 years and 1.5 years, respectively.
The fair value of these liability classified warrants was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. This method of valuation involves using inputs such as the fair value of our common stock, historical volatility, the contractual term of the warrants, risk-free interest rates and dividend yields.
In connection with the Inducement, the Company recognized total inducement expense of $2,567,044 during the year ended December 31, 2024.
The principal consideration for our determination that the evaluation of the inducement transaction was a critical audit matter is the high degree of subjectivity and judgment by management in determining (1) the accounting conclusions related to the treatment of new warrants issued and the prior warrants modified in the context of the inducement transaction and (2) the fair values of the warrants given the sensitivity of the underlying significant assumptions specifically the expected volatility. Auditing these elements involved especially challenging and subjective auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of audit effort required to address these matters, including the extent of specialized skill or knowledge needed.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures performed to address this critical audit matter included the following, among others:
| ● | We evaluated the appropriateness of management’s accounting conclusions related to the treatment of new warrants issued and the prior warrants modified in the context of the inducement transaction. |
| ● | We involved our fair value specialist who assisted in evaluating the reasonableness of management’s valuation methodology and significant assumptions in the valuation model, including the expected volatility. |
| ● | We evaluated the competency and objectivity of management’s expert engaged to perform the valuation. |
/s/ GRASSI & CO., CPAs, P.C.
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2023.
Jericho, New York
April 8, 2025
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.