Skip to main content

Elmet Group Co.

For the period ended Oct 2, 2026. Filed Nov 9, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.

Oct 2, 2026 · Filed Nov 9, 2026

ELMT$21.99+12.1%Stored close · as of Nov 9, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits

Item 1A. Risk Factors

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, we are not required to provide information required by this Item. Our current risk factors are set forth in the section entitled “Risk Factors” contained in our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-294725), as amended and supplemented (the “IPO Registration Statement”), and declared effective by the SEC on April 22, 2026.

Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in the IPO Registration Statement.

The purchase price for the OSRAM Acquisition is not currently determinable. The final purchase price we pay at the OSRAM Closing will be determined by a number of factors, some of which, including the price of tungsten, will be outside of our control. The final purchase price may differ from our pre-OSRAM Closing expectations, which if the difference is significant, could materially affect our financial results.

The final purchase price we pay for the OSRAM Acquisition will not be determined until the OSRAM Closing and will be determined in accordance with a purchase price formulation detailed in the Purchase Agreement, which includes factors outside of our control. For example, part of the value that will be ascribed to the OSRAM Business at the OSRAM Closing is the current inventory of the OSRAM Business, which includes significant amounts of APT, molybdenum powder, work in process and finished goods that will be valued at prevailing market prices. The international tungsten market has seen significant volatility in recent years, with prices surging from $330 per metric ton unit on January 1, 2025, to over $3,132 per metric ton unit on July 3, 2026, an increase of over 949%. If the price of tungsten were to significantly increase, or the value of any of the factors of the purchase price formulation were to significantly change between the date hereof and the OSRAM Closing, it could result in a significant increase in the purchase price for the OSRAM Acquisition. If the purchase price for the OSRAM Acquisition were to significantly increase above our current expectations, among other things, the OSRAM Acquisition may become economically unviable, forcing us to abandon the OSRAM Acquisition and potentially pay liquidated damages to OSRAM, or, if we consummate the transaction it may take us longer than anticipated to obtain the anticipated benefits from the OSRAM Acquisition, if we are able to obtain a benefit at all. Whether the OSRAM Acquisition is consummated or abandoned, any significant increase to the purchase price for the OSRAM Acquisition could have a material adverse impact on our business, liquidity position, financial condition and results of operations. See “Part I Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Recent Developments.”

While we have executed the DoW Transaction Documents with the DoW and received funding thereunder, there can be no assurances that the authorization of and continued support for the transactions contemplated by the DoW Transaction Documents will not be modified, challenged or impaired in the future, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

The DoW Transaction Documents contain representations by the DoW regarding its authority to enter into the DoW Transaction Documents and the availability of funds for the Initial Closing Date. Those representations were made solely for purposes of the Investment Agreement and should not be construed as a legal opinion, a representation by any other U.S. Government entity, or an endorsement of the Company, its securities, or its projects. The parties’ respective obligations under the DoW Transaction Documents are subject to the terms of those agreements and applicable law. A dispute or legal or administrative challenge concerning the interpretation, validity, enforceability, or performance of the DoW Transaction Documents could materially adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. No U.S. Government entity other than the DoW is a party to, or assumes obligations under, the DoW Transaction Documents. The DoW Transaction Documents contain affirmative covenants requiring us to take certain actions and negative covenants restricting us from taking certain actions. A failure by us to comply with those covenants could constitute an event of default under the DoW Transaction Documents. In that event, subject to the applicable terms of the DoW Transaction Documents, the DoW may exercise the remedies provided therein, which may include termination of one or more of the DoW Transaction Documents and redemption of the Class A Preferred Stock, any of which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial position.

The DoW Transaction Documents require us to make substantial investments in and commitments to specific aspects of our business, including, among others, the Springer Transactions. We received $200 million at the Initial Closing Date and expect to rely in part on the additional funding commitment provided for in the Investment Agreement to implement certain planned projects and its related business strategy. The Investment Agreement contemplates up to $250 million of additional preferred stock purchases during specified funding periods following the Initial Closing Date, subject to our exercise of our funding rights and the satisfaction or waiver of applicable closing conditions. Those conditions include, among other things, continuing congressional authorization or reauthorization for the contemplated investments and the availability of appropriations. If the subsequent closing does not occur when expected, including because applicable conditions are not satisfied or waived, we may need to seek alternate financing or modify the timing, scope, or sequencing of its planned projects. There can be no assurance that alternative financing would be available on acceptable terms, in a timely manner or at all. If we cannot obtain alternate financing when needed, it may be required to reduce costs, or delay, cancel, or scale back development projects. Further, historically, market prices for critical materials, such as tungsten, and their downstream products have been subject to a high degree of volatility. Because many of our products may be designed to satisfy DoW specifications and requirements, our products may not find customers in the commercial marketplace, and our profitability may be materially adversely impacted if we are unable to identify alternative sales channels, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Our operations are subject to extensive federal, state, local and other regulatory requirements. If applicable laws or regulations are interpreted or enforced in a manner adverse to us, we may be subject to enforcement actions, penalties, exclusion, and other material limitations on our operations. Our obligations under, and the performance or termination of, the DoW Transaction Documents may affect our operations and strategic plans. The DoW Transaction Documents do not assure us of access to sources of supply, the receipt of permits and approvals, or action or assistance by any government entity except as expressly provided therein. We remain responsible for obtaining all permits, approvals, supply arrangements, and authorizations required for our operations and projects. A modification, termination or failure of performance under one or more of the DoW Transaction Documents could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations, and any remedies available to us would be subject to the applicable agreements and applicable law.

In addition, our performance under the DoW Transaction Documents may subject us to additional contractual and compliance requirements that could constrain our future business or otherwise adversely affect our financial results. We may be subject to heightened scrutiny of our business activities with both government and non-government customers, government audits, investigations, congressional scrutiny, inquiries about conflicts of interest, civil or criminal enforcement by the Department of Justice (including actions under the False Claims Act), exclusion or limitation on future government-funded opportunities, suspension, debarment, and other administrative remedies. See “Part I Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Recent Developments – Department of War Transaction.”

An event of default or Liquidation Event under the DoW Transaction Documents could require us to redeem all, or a portion of, the outstanding Class A Preferred Stock, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

Upon the occurrence of an event of default or Liquidation Event under the DoW Transaction Documents, each of the holders of Class A Preferred Stock may, in its sole discretion, require us to redeem all, or any portion, of its outstanding shares of Class A Preferred Stock in accordance with the terms of the Class A Certificate of Designations. Any such redemption obligation could require us to use a significant portion of our available cash or obtain additional financing, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all. If we fail to pay the applicable redemption price when due, such failure will constitute an event of default under the DoW Transaction Documents. The resulting reduction in our liquidity and available capital, or an event of default under the DoW Transaction Documents, could materially adversely affect our ability to fund our operations and meet our other obligations and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. See “Part I Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Recent Developments – Department of War Transaction.”

The DoW Transaction Documents contain affirmative and negative covenants that may restrict our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to take actions management believes are important to our long-term strategy, and therefore could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, or results of operations.

The DoW Transaction Documents contain affirmative covenants requiring us to take certain actions and negative covenants restricting our ability to take certain actions. The affirmative covenants impose obligations on us with respect to, among other things, (i) own or hold valid licensed rights to use all intellectual property and technology material to the Projects; (ii) maintain, prosecute and defend all material registrations and applications included in the intellectual property material to the Projects, and use commercially reasonable efforts to preserve the confidentiality of all material trade secrets and know-how included in the intellectual property material to the Projects; and (iii) comply in all material respects with all applicable export control and technology-transfer laws. The negative covenants in the DoW Transaction Documents restrict us with respect to, among other things, (i) authorize, create or issue any additional equity securities, or any securities convertible into or exercisable for any equity securities, of the Company having rights, preferences or privileges senior to, or in parity with the Class A Preferred Stock; (ii) change the authorized number of directors of the Board of Directors (or the number of votes provided to each director); (iii) enter into any transactions with an affiliate of the Company pursuant to which the Company shall make any payment, sell, lease, transfer, or dispose of any of this properties or assets to, or purchase any property or assets from, or enter or amend any transaction or arrangement with, or for the benefit of, such affiliate of the Company involving aggregate value in excess of $120,000; (iv) knowingly issuing common stock to Restricted Entities (as defined in the Investor Rights Agreement) and person(s) from foreign jurisdictions other than certain permitted jurisdictions; (v) being owned or controlled by, transferring property to, or otherwise doing business with any Restricted Entity in violation of applicable law, subject to specified exceptions; and (vi) making any Restricted Payments (as defined in the Investor Rights Agreement).

Compliance with the affirmative and negative covenants contained in the DoW Transaction Documents could restrict our ability to take actions that management believes are important to our long-term strategy. If strategic transactions we wish to undertake are prohibited by the DoW Transaction Documents, our ability to execute our long-term strategy could be materially adversely affected, which could in turn have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition, or results of operations. See “Part I Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Recent Developments – Department of War Transaction.”

The exercise of the DoW Penny Warrant and DoW Strike Price Warrant into shares of Common Stock would dilute the ownership position of existing common stockholders, and the subsequent sale of a substantial number of such shares of Common Stock in the public market, or the perception of such sales, could cause our stock price to decline.

The shares of common stock into which the DoW Penny Warrant and DoW Strike Price Warrant are initially exercisable collectively represent 24.84% of our issued and outstanding common stock as of the Initial Closing Date, without giving effect to the issuance of such shares. The DoW Penny Warrant and DoW Strike Price Warrant are exercisable at any time and from time to time after the date that is twelve (12) months after the Initial Closing Date, and the initial exercise prices of the DoW Penny Warrant and DoW Strike Price Warrant are equal to $0.001 and $15.92, respectively. At any time after the three-year anniversary of the Initial Closing Date, if the VWAP of our common stock exceeds 400% of the exercise price of the DoW Strike Price Warrant for 20 consecutive trading days, the DoW Warrants will be subject to a mandatory exercise, on a cashless basis, provided, that, we provide 20 calendar days’ prior notice, allowing the holders of the DoW Warrants to exercise for cash. Any portion of the DoW Warrants that remains unexercised upon their expiration shall be automatically exercised by means of a “cashless” exercise as set forth in the DoW Warrants. As such, existing common stockholders may experience substantial dilution of their ownership positions.

Furthermore, the sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales might occur, including of the shares issuable upon exercise of the DoW Warrants, could depress the market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. We are unable to predict the effect that sales may have on the prevailing market price of our common stock. See “Part I Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Recent Developments – Department of War Transaction – DoW Warrants.”

The financial, tax and accounting treatment of the DoW Transactions contemplated by the DoW Transaction Documents remains uncertain and subject to change.

Given both the novelty and complexity of the DoW Transactions, our initial analysis of the financial, tax and accounting implications of its commitments and obligations under the DoW Transaction Documents has not been completed and may take considerable time and require significant attention from management. The accounting for the DoW Transactions is complex and involves significant judgments and estimates. Our conclusions are based on the current contractual terms and facts and may require revision if those terms are modified or relevant facts change. Additionally, no assurance can be provided that this initial assessment will not require adjustment or amendment over time due to changes in tax law or regulations, accounting practices and requirements and unforeseen developments in the course of providing services and receiving cash flows relating to the DoW Transactions. The DoW Transaction Documents are also highly integrated, and certain of the obligations under each DoW Transaction Document are contingent upon or impacted by the terms and obligations of the others. If one or more of the DoW Transaction Documents, or one or more elements of the DoW Transactions, were to be altered, amended or terminated, management would need to assess the financial, tax and accounting implications of such changes, which could be significant, together with any related remedies available to us and the present condition of our business and operations. We are unable to predict, and may not be able to anticipate, either these changes or the impact thereof. Any of the foregoing may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations, including, but not limited to, material changes to our financial outlook, recharacterizations, restatements or other modifications of our financial statements or adjustments to previously provided estimates or guidance.

The Springer Transactions will require us to make substantial investments, and we may not realize the anticipated benefits from these investments.

We will be making substantial investments in connection with the Springer Transactions, specifically the JV Entity and the Blue Moon Investment. We may not realize the anticipated strategic, operational or financial benefits of these investments, and the costs required to develop and operate the JV Entity, including but not limited to, the APT Plant, may exceed our expectations. We may also encounter difficulties in managing the JV Entity, aligning the interests of the JV Entity partners, achieving anticipated synergies and efficiencies, and retaining key personnel and business relationships. If the JV Entity and its operations or the Blue Moon Investment do not perform as anticipated, or if we are unable to realize the expected benefits of such investments, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. See “Part I Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Recent Developments – Springer Project.”

We may not realize the anticipated benefits of the DLA Offtake Agreement if it is unable to satisfy contractual requirements, achieve planned production levels, or deliver tungsten ore or concentrate or sodium tungstate in accordance with applicable specifications and timelines.

Our ability to generate revenue and achieve the strategic benefits contemplated by the DLA Offtake Agreement depends on our ability to successfully develop, finance, construct, and operate our production facilities or contract for supply of tungsten ore and concentrate and sodium tungstate to meet contractual requirements, including volume commitments, delivery schedules, quality standards, and other performance obligations. Delays in project execution, permitting, financing, supply chain disruptions, technical challenges, or operational difficulties could impair our ability to fulfill our obligations under the DLA Offtake Agreement and could result in reduced purchases, contractual penalties, termination, or loss of anticipated commercial opportunities with the U.S. government or other industry participants.

The Defense Logistics Agency may modify, suspend, delay, or terminate the DLA Offtake Agreement, and government funding, policy priorities, or procurement decisions may change.

Offtake agreements with U.S. government entities may be subject to federal procurement requirements, appropriations, agency priorities, and contractual provisions that provide the government with certain rights not typically available in commercial agreements. Changes in government policy, legislation, administration priorities, funding availability, national security priorities, or procurement requirements could adversely affect the continuation, timing, scope, or economic terms of the DLA Offtake Agreement. Any reduction, delay, modification, or termination of the agreement could materially impact our expected revenues, business plans, and financial condition.

If we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), including as a result of our investments in Masan and Blue Moon, applicable restrictions could make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Under Sections 3(a)(1)(A) and (C) of the 1940 Act, a company generally will be deemed to be an “investment company” for purposes of the 1940 Act if (1) it is, or holds itself out as being, engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in securities, or (2) it engages, or proposes to engage, in the business of investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading in securities and it owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis (the “40% Test”). We do not believe that we are an “investment company,” as such term is defined in either of those sections of the 1940 Act. We intend to conduct our operations so that we will not be deemed an investment company. However, our investments in Masan, Blue Moon and other strategic relationships could be considered “investment securities” for purposes of the 1940 Act, and if the value of our investments in Masan, Blue Moon or others were to violate the 40% Test, we may inadvertently be deemed an investment company and be forced to divest some of our ownership of Masan, Blue Moon or other companies’ securities. If it were established that we were an unregistered investment company, we could be subject to monetary penalties and injunctive relief in an action brought by the SEC, we could be unable to enforce contracts with third parties and third parties could seek to obtain rescission of transactions undertaken during the period it was established that we were an unregistered investment company. If we were required to register as an investment company, restrictions imposed by the 1940 Act, including limitations on our capital structure and our ability to transact with affiliates, could make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated and could have a material adverse effect on our business.

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.