MongoDB, Inc.

The information required to be set forth under this Item 1 is incorporated by reference to Note 7, Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q.

On July 9, 2024, a putative class action lawsuit, captioned Baxter v. MongoDB, Inc., et al.(Case No. 1:24-cv-5191), was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against MongoDB, former CEO Dev Ittycheria, and former COO and CFO Michael Gordon (the “Securities Action”). On January 27, 2025, the lead plaintiff in the Securities Action filed an Amended Complaint naming former Senior Vice President of Finance and former Interim CFO Srdjan Tanjga as an additional defendant. The operative complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act, and alleges that defendants made material misstatements and/or omissions, including regarding MongoDB’s sales strategy, growth projections and financial results. The complaint is purportedly brought on behalf of a putative class of persons who purchased or otherwise acquired MongoDB common stock between June 1, 2023 and May 30, 2024. It seeks unspecified monetary damages, costs and attorneys’ fees, and other unspecified relief. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on May 9, 2025. On May 1, 2026, the Court entered an order granting in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss and denying it in part. On May 15, 2026, Defendants filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order on the motion to dismiss. The motion for reconsideration is currently fully briefed and pending before the Court. Defendants also filed their Answer to the operative complaint on June 15, 2026. The Company is unable to estimate any reasonably possible loss, or range of loss, with respect to these matters at this time. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in this matter.

On October 7, 2024, a purported shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Roy v. Ittycheria et al. (Case No. 1:24-cv-7594), against the Company, as a nominal defendant, and former CEO Dev Ittycheria, former COO and CFO Michael Gordon, and several of the Company’s current and former directors. The lawsuit alleges that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties and committed other alleged misconduct in connection with the statements at issue in the Securities Action and by causing the Company to issue allegedly false and misleading statements to investors. Another similar case, Silva v. Ittycheria, et al. (Case No. 1:24-cv-9014) was subsequently filed in the same district on November 25, 2024 against MongoDB, as nominal defendant, and the same individual defendants as the Roy S.D.N.Y. action. It has been consolidated with the Roy action with the caption In re MongoDB, Inc. Shareholder Litigation (Case No. 1:24-cv-7594) (the “S.D.N.Y. Derivative Litigation”). On June 14, 2026, the plaintiffs in the S.D.N.Y. Derivative Litigation filed an amended complaint, naming former Senior Vice President of Finance and former Interim CFO Srdjan Tanjga as an additional defendant. On September 12, 2025, another purported derivative action was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (Case No. 2025-1030) (the “Delaware Derivative Litigation”), against the Company, as a nominal defendant, and former CEO Dev Ittycheria, former COO and CFO Michael Gordon, former Senior Vice President of Finance and former Interim CFO Srdjan Tanjga and several of the Company’s current and former directors. The case is captioned Sansone v. Ittycheria, et al. On June 10, 2026, another purported derivative action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Fernicola v. Ittycheria, et al.(Case No. 1:26-cv-4918), against the Company, as a nominal defendant, and the same individual defendants as the S.D.N.Y. Derivative Litigation. On July 1, 2026, an additional purported derivative action was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned Andrews v. Ittycheria, et al. (Case No. 1:26-cv-5586), against the Company, as a nominal defendant, the individual defendants in the Delaware Derivative Litigation, and former Chief Revenue Officer and former President of Field Operations Cedric Pech. These additional derivative lawsuits, like the S.D.N.Y. Derivative Litigation, allege that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties and committed other alleged misconduct in connection with the statements at issue in the Securities Action and by causing the Company to issue allegedly false and misleading statements to investors. The S.D.N.Y. Derivative Litigation, the Delaware Derivative Litigation, and the Fernicola action have been stayed pending the outcome of the Court’s decision on the Defendants’ motion for reconsideration in the Securities Action.

From time to time, we may be subject to other legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business.

Future litigation may be necessary to defend ourselves, our partners and our customers by determining the scope, enforceability and validity of third-party proprietary rights, or to establish our proprietary rights. The results of any current or future litigation cannot be predicted with certainty and, regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.