MAMMOTH ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Mar 6, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Mar 6, 2026
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2025, the related consolidated statementof operations and comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity, and cash flows, for the year ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 6, 2026, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our auditin accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Impairment of long-lived assets — Refer to Notes 2 and 6 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company assesses its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable, referred to as triggering events. Possible indications of impairment may include events or changes in circumstances affecting the manner in which the assets are being used, historical and estimated future profitability measures, and other adverse events or changes that could affect the value of the assets. If a triggering event is identified, recoverability is assessed using undiscounted future net cash flows of assets grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets. If the carrying amount exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows, an analysis is performed to determine the fair value of the assets and the related impairment. The Company recorded $31.7 million related to the impairment of long-lived assets for the year ended December 31, 2025.
The Company makes significant assumptions to evaluate long-lived assets for possible indications of impairment. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on the long-lived assets identified for further analysis. For those long-lived assets where indications of impairment have been identified, the Company makes significant estimates and assumptions to determine the fair value using either: (1) undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated over the life of the asset, including estimates and assumptions related to the discount rate and profitability measures, or (2) external valuations or reasonable market indications of the underlying long-lived assets to approximate a relative fair market value. Assumptions made by the Company in preparing undiscounted cash flow analyses for long-lived assets are useful life of the underlying assets, forecasts of revenue growth and EBITDA.
We identified the Company’s process to identify impairment indicators for long-lived assets and the measurement of impairment of long-lived assets as a critical audit matter because of (1) the significant judgment management uses when determining whether events or changes in circumstances have occurred indicating that the carrying amounts of long-lived assets may not be recoverable and (2) for those long-lived assets where indications of impairment have been identified, the significant judgment used in determining assumptions to be used in the evaluation of the recoverability of long-lived assets. Audit procedures performed to evaluate (1) whether management appropriately identified impairment indicators and (2) the reasonableness of management’s assumptions to estimate future cash flows to conclude on the recoverability of the recorded value required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of audit effort.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to impairment of long-lived assets included the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting related to management’s evaluation of impairment. This included controls related to the Company’s process to identify and evaluate triggering events, including the consideration of market conditions in determining whether a triggering event exists;
We evaluated the Company’s process for identifying qualitative and quantitative impairment indicators of long-lived assets and whether the Company appropriately considered such indicators;
We developed an independent expectation of impairment indicators and compared such expectation to management’s analysis.
We evaluated management’s determination of the long-lived asset’s estimated useful life as well as any factors impacting the useful life, such as plans to sell and any relevant purchase and sales agreements for assets sold or assets held for sale.
We evaluated the reasonableness of the methodology and assumptions used in the Company’s forecasted undiscounted cash flows by:
–Inspecting minutes of the Board of Directors and committees to understand if there were factors that would represent potential impairment indicators for long-lived assets;
–Considering industry and analyst reports and the impact of macroeconomic factors, such as adverse changes in the regulatory environment, legislation or other factors that may represent impairment indicators not previously contemplated in management’s analysis;
–Comparing forecasts to historical financial results;
–Performing sensitivity analysis for the forecasts and revenue growth rate utilized.
/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
March 6, 2026
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2025.
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
Opinion on the financial statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP
We served as the Company’s auditor from 2012 to 2024.
March 7, 2025 (except for Note 3 and the effects thereof, Note 12, and Note 19 as to which the date is March 6, 2026)
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.