Ranpak Holdings Corp.

Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Measures

As noted above, we believe that in order to better understand the performance of the Company, providing non-GAAP financial measures to users of our financial information is helpful. We believe presentation of these non-GAAP measures is useful because they are many of the key measures that allow management to evaluate more effectively our operating performance and compare the results of our operations from period to period and against peers without regard to financing methods or capital structure. Management does not consider these non-GAAP measures in isolation or as an alternative to similar financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP. The computations of EBITDA, AEBITDA and Constant Currency (Non-GAAP) % Change may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. These non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered as alternatives to, or more meaningful than, measures of financial performance as determined in accordance with GAAP or as indicators of operating performance.

The following tables and related notes reconcile certain non-GAAP measures to GAAP information presented in this Report for 2025 and 2024:

(see subsequent footnotes)

(1)Reconciliations of EBITDA and AEBITDA for each period presented are to net loss, the nearest GAAP equivalent.

(2)Adjustments are related to non-cash unusual or infrequent costs such as: effects of non-cash foreign currency remeasurement or adjustment; impairment of returned machines; costs associated with the evaluation of acquisitions; costs associated with executive severance; costs associated with restructuring actions such as plant rationalization or realignment, reorganization, and reductions in force; costs associated with the implementation of the global ERP system; and other items deemed by management to be unusual, infrequent, or non-recurring.

(3)Represents amortization of capitalized costs primarily related to the implementation of the global ERP system, which are included in SG&A.

(4)Third-party professional services and consulting fees related to post-implementation system remediation.

(5)In 2025, Other adjustments includes non-recurring warehouse and transitory costs incurred related to conversion services, non-recurring excess above market procurement costs, and other insignificant items. In 2024, Other adjustments represents primarily non-recurring costs incurred from the outsourcing of paper conversion services, legal expenses and fees related to the Company’s patent litigation which was settled in the second quarter of 2024, and other insignificant items.

(6)The Constant Currency (Non-GAAP) % Change excludes the impact of foreign currency translation effects when comparing current results to the prior year. In calculating the Constant Currency (Non-GAAP) % Change, the current year results are translated at the average exchange rate for the prior year period, which in this case was 1 Euro to 1.0822 USD. Refer to further discussion in “Non-GAAP Measures.”

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We evaluate liquidity in terms of cash flows from operations and other sources and the sufficiency of such cash flows to fund our operating, investing and financing activities. We believe that our cash and cash equivalents of $63.0 million as of December 31, 2025 and cash flow from operations, together with borrowing capacity under the revolving portion of our senior secured credit facilities, will provide us with sufficient resources to cover our current requirements.

Our main liquidity needs relate to capital expenditures and expenses for the production and maintenance of PPS systems placed at end-user facilities, working capital, including the purchase of paper raw materials, and payments of principal and interest on our outstanding debt. Our AS and APS product lines are for the sale of capital goods and we do not require significant capital expenditures for production equipment to support growth. We expect our capital expenditures to increase as we continue to grow our business, expand our manufacturing footprint, and upgrade our existing systems and facilities. We continue to evaluate our inventory requirements and adjust according to our volume forecasts. Our future capital requirements and the adequacy of available funds will depend on many factors, and if we are unable to obtain needed additional funds, we may have to reduce our operating costs or incur additional debt, which could impair our growth prospects and/or otherwise negatively impact our business. Further, volatility in the equity and credit markets from macroeconomic factors could make obtaining new equity or debt financing more difficult or expensive.

Including finance lease liabilities and financing arrangements and excluding deferred financing costs, we had $410.5 million in debt, $5.5 million of which was classified as short-term, as of December 31, 2025, compared to $415.7 million in debt, $5.6 million of which was classified as short-term, as of December 31, 2024. At December 31, 2025, we did not have amounts outstanding under our $50.0 million revolving credit facility, and we had no borrowings under such facility through March 5, 2026.

Debt Profile

The material terms of our debt are summarized in Note 7 — Long-Term Debt to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Report.

On December 19, 2024, the Company entered into a First Lien Credit Agreement (the “2024 Credit Agreement”), which consists of senior secured credit facilities of a $410.0 million USD-denominated first lien term facility (the “Term Facility”) and a $50.0 million revolving facility available in USD and Euros (the “Revolving Facility” and together with the Term Facility, the “Facilities”). The Term Facility matures in December 2031 and the Revolving Facility matures in December 2029. Borrowings under the Facilities, at our option, bear interest at either (1) the secured overnight financing rate (“SOFR”) plus 4.50% or (2) the base rate plus 3.50%, in each case assuming a First Lien Leverage Ratio, as defined in the 2024 Credit Agreement, of greater than 3.60:1.00, and subject to a leverage-based step-down to 4.25% for SOFR borrowing and 3.25% for base rate borrowings, respectively. The interest rate for the Term Facility as of December 31, 2025 was 8.42% and the effective rate is 9.30%.

As of December 31, 2025, no amounts were outstanding under the Revolving Facility. The Revolving Facility includes borrowing capacity available for standby letters of credit of up to $50.0 million. Any issuance of letters of credit reduces the amount available under the revolving facility. As of December 31, 2025, we had $5.9 million committed to outstanding letters of credit, leaving net availability under the Revolving Facility at $44.1 million.

The Facilities provide the Company with the option to increase commitments under the Facilities in an aggregate amount not to exceed the greater of $85.0 million and 100% of Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (as defined in the 2024 Credit Agreement), plus certain voluntary prepayments (and in the case of the Revolving Facility, to the extent such voluntary prepayments are accompanied by permanent commitment reductions under the Revolving Facility), plus unlimited amounts subject to the relevant net leverage ratio tests and certain other conditions.

The obligations of (i) Ranpak Corp. (the “U.S. Borrower”) under the Facilities and certain of its obligations under hedging arrangements and cash management arrangements are guaranteed by Ranger Pledgor LLC (“Holdings”) and each existing and subsequently acquired or organized direct or indirect wholly-owned U.S.-organized restricted subsidiary of the U.S. Borrower (together with Holdings, the “ U.S. Guarantors”) and (ii) Ranpak B.V. (the “Dutch Borrower”) under the Facilities are unconditionally guaranteed by the U.S. Borrower, the U.S. Guarantors and each existing and subsequently acquired or organized direct or indirect wholly-owned Dutch-organized restricted subsidiary of the U.S. Borrower (the “Dutch Guarantors”, and together with the U.S. Guarantors, the “Guarantors” or the “Borrowers”), in each case, other than certain excluded subsidiaries. The Facilities are secured by (i) a first priority pledge of the equity interests of the Borrowers and of each direct, wholly-owned restricted subsidiary of any Borrower or any Guarantor and (ii) a first priority security interest in substantially all of the assets of the Borrowers and the Guarantors (in each case, subject to customary exceptions), provided that obligations of the U.S. Borrower and U.S. Guarantors under the Facilities were not secured by assets of the Dutch Borrower or any Dutch Guarantor.

The Facilities are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company. No mandatory prepayments were required as of December 31, 2025, and the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants.

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth our summary cash flow information for the periods indicated:

Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $23.1 million in 2025. Cash provided by operating activities was $41.4 million in 2024. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to the increase in net loss, largely due to the litigation settlement proceeds of $16.1 million in the prior year which did not recur in the current year period. Accounts receivable and inventory increased in the current year compared to the prior year and we expect that this trend will continue, due to large enterprise accounts.

Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $32.8 million in 2025 and reflects cash used for production of converter equipment and purchases of machinery and equipment, and cash paid for investments in Pickle. Net cash used in investing activities was $32.5 million in 2024 and reflects cash used for production of converter equipment and purchases of machinery and equipment, and an additional investment in Pickle of $4.8 million, partially offset by proceeds from sale of patents of $5.4 million.

Cash Flows (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $7.0 million in 2025 and reflects principal payments on our term loans, payments on finance lease liabilities, tax payments for withholdings on stock compensation, and payments on financing arrangements, partially offset by proceeds from our financing arrangements and our hedging instruments. Net cash provided by financing activities was $1.8 million in 2024 and reflects the proceeds from the 2024 Credit Agreement, partially offset by repayments of our prior debt facilities and related exit costs, payments for financing costs related to our 2024 Credit Agreement, payments on finance lease liabilities, net repayments on our financing arrangements, and tax payments for withholdings on stock-based compensation.

Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments

We have cash obligations under our leases for facilities and automobiles andunder our Term Facility, which are described in more detail in Note 12 — Leases and in Note 7 — Long-Term Debt in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements. We have various contractual obligations and commercial commitments that are recorded as liabilities in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2025.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our accounting principles and the methods of applying these principles are in accordance with GAAP, which often require the judgment of management in the selection and application of certain accounting principles and methods. We consider the following accounting policies to be critical to understanding our financial statements because the application of these policies requires significant judgment on the part of management, which could have a material impact on our financial statements. The following accounting policies include estimates that require management’s subjective or complex judgments about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. For information on our significant accounting policies, including the policies discussed below, see Note 2 — Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to the audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Report.

Revenue Recognition— Revenue from contracts with customers is recognized using a five-step model consisting of the following: (i) identify the contract with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) we satisfy a performance obligation. Performance obligations are satisfied when we transfer control of a good or service to a customer, which can occur over time or at a point in time. The amount of revenue recognized is based on the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services, including the expected value of variable consideration. The customer’s ability and intent to pay the transaction price is assessed in determining whether a contract exists with the customer. If collectability of substantially all of the consideration in a contract is not probable, consideration received is not recognized as revenue unless the consideration is nonrefundable and we no longer have an obligation to transfer additional goods or services to the customer or collectability becomes probable.

We sell our PPS products to end-users primarily through an established distributor network and direct sales to select end-users. For both customer types, the customer is granted the right to use our machine(s) for which we charge a fixed fee or may waive the fee at management’s discretion. Our revenue associated with our PPS business contains (i) a non-lease component (the paper consumables) accounted for as revenue under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), and (ii) a lease component (our PPS systems) accounted for as machine lease revenue under ASC Topic 842, Leases (“ASC 842”). Machine lease revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the PPS systems agreements with customers, which have durations of less than one year.

We determine the standalone selling price for a performance obligation sold on a standalone basis for our paper products. Judgment is applied to allocate a percentage of PPS paper revenue to machine lease revenue using the residual approach to estimate the standalone selling price of our PPS systems to customers. The allocation is performed based on the number of PPS systems in the field. We do not sell or transfer ownership of our PPS systems to our customers. Our lease agreements with customer for PPS systems are for one year or less and renew annually.

We have forms of variable consideration present in our contracts with customers, including rebates on volume and other discounts. For all contracts that contain a form of variable consideration, we estimate at contract inception, and periodically throughout the term of the contract, what volume of goods and/or services the customer will purchase in a given period and determine how much consideration is payable to the customer or how much consideration we would be able to recover from the customer based on the structure of the type of variable consideration, using either the expected value method or the most likely amount method. In most cases, the variable consideration in contracts with customers results in amounts payable to the customer by the Company. We adjust the contract transaction price based on any changes in estimates each reporting period and perform an inception to date cumulative adjustment to the amount of revenue previously recognized. We include in the transaction price some or all of an amount of variable consideration estimated to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved.

We recognize revenue from each Automation product separately, on a contract-by-contract basis (i.e., by individual machine). Our automation machines are highly customized to customer specific needs and termination is only allowed in the case of breach of contract. As such, we are entitled to all consideration from the production of the machine. We cannot sell the machine to another customer due to the level of customization, and as such, there is not an alternative use for the product produced. Because of these factors, we recognize machine revenue over time on a contract-by-contract basis using an input method, based on the percentage of costs and effort incurred to complete the construction of the machine.

We grant warrants in our common stock to certain customers which we account for as consideration payable to a customer. The value of the warrants is recognized as a reduction in the transaction price over the term of the contract. The reduction in revenue is recognized ratably as performance obligations are achieved. A portion of the warrants awarded to customers immediately vested on the grant date which we concluded to be an upfront payment. We apply judgment to evaluate the recoverability of the warrant-related assets based on our forecast of future payments expected to be received from these customers.

Goodwill, Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets, and Long-Lived Assets. Goodwill is not subject to amortization but is tested for impairment annually at a reporting unit level as of October 1 st and between annual tests if events and circumstances indicate that the estimated fair value of a reporting unit may no longer exceed its carrying value. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

Application of the goodwill impairment test requires judgment, including the identification of reporting units (North America and Europe/Asia), assignment of goodwill to reporting units, and determination of the fair value of reporting units. We assess, use estimates, and make judgments regarding a variety of factors that may impact the fair value of the goodwill reporting unit being tested. These estimates and judgments include, but are not limited to, projected revenues, gross margin, operating expense, and discount rate, which are dependent on business plans, anticipated future cash flows, economic projections, and other market data.

The test for goodwill used unobservable inputs that required significant judgment and was performed using a combination of the Discounted Cash Flow Method and the Guideline Public Company Method to estimate fair value. Upon completion of the annual impairment assessment, we concluded that neither reporting unit was impaired. However, the test for one of our goodwill reporting units that encompasses our business in North America indicated that fair value of the reporting unit was close to approximating carrying value. The unobservable inputs that required significant judgment include estimates and assumptions affected by conditions specific to our businesses, economic conditions related to the industries in which we operate, and conditions in the global economy. Changes in these estimates and assumptions may result in an impairment charge for the North America reporting unit.

The assumptions that have the most significant effect on the fair values of our North America reporting unit based on the Discounted Cash Flow Method are (i) the expected revenue growth rate, (ii) gross margin, (iii) projected operating expense, and (iv) discount rate. An impairment charge would have resulted from a hypothetical 1.8% reduction in long-term revenue growth, a 3.1% decline in long-term gross margin, a 3.1% increase in long-term operating expenses, or a 1.3% increase in the discount rate.

We believe that our estimates and assumptions used in our annual impairment assessment are reasonable but are subject to change from period to period. Because there are inherent uncertainties in these estimates and judgments, significant differences between actual results of operations and other factors and the estimates used could result in significant differences and if we fail an impairment test, any non-cash impairment charge may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

For recently issued and adopted accounting pronouncements, see Note 2 — Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Report.