Skip to main content

Marcus & Millichap, Inc.

For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Feb 26, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2025 · Filed Feb 26, 2026

MMI$24.62-6.7%Stored close · as of Nov 10, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Marcus & Millichap, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Marcus & Millichap, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated February 26, 2026 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Deferred commissions payable
Description of the MatterAt December 31, 2025, the Company’s commissions payable to investment sales and financing professionals was $72.5 million. As discussed in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements, certain investment sales and financing professionals have the ability to earn additional commissions after meeting certain annual revenue thresholds. All commissions are recognized as cost of services in the period in which they are earned as they relate to specific transactions closed. The Company has the ability to defer payment of certain commissions at its election, for up to three years. These payments are referred to as deferred commissions.Auditing the Company’s deferred commissions was complex with regard to evaluating the completeness of the population of investment sales and financing professionals eligible for deferred commissions and the accuracy of the investment sales and financing professionals’ revenue production to meet thresholds used in determining deferred commissions earned.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our AuditWe evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over the deferred commissions process. We also tested controls over the completeness and accuracy of the data used in calculating the deferred commissions, including approvals.To test the deferred commissions payable, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, evaluating the completeness of the deferred commissions schedule based on investment sales and financing professionals’ sales performance. Additionally, we obtained agreements for a sample of agents and recalculated the deferred commissions payable balances based on the agreement terms and investment sales and financing professionals’ revenue production and commission splits. Finally, we inspected for evidence of the eligibility approval process and performed a hindsight analysis to evaluate the cash disbursed compared to the respective deferred commissions previously accrued.
Income Taxes
Description of the MatterAt December 31, 2025, the Company’s gross deferred tax assets and valuation allowance were $75 million and $6 million, respectively. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company evaluates deferred tax assets to assess whether the deferred tax assets will be realized. Valuation allowances are provided against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Auditing the Company’s assessment of the deferred tax assets was complex with regard to evaluating management’s judgements used in considering both positive and negative evidence supporting the realizability of the deferred tax assets. The Company’s projection of future taxable income, and the ability to utilize deferred tax assets, relies on several key assumptions such as anticipated average commission rates and projected revenue growth rates for both revenue and expenses. Evaluation of the timing of the deferred tax reversals involved a high degree of auditor judgement to assess, including the use of our tax specialists.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our AuditWe evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over the valuation allowance process. We also tested controls over the completeness and accuracy of the data used in the Company’s forecast and deferred tax asset utilization analysis, including approvals.To test the realizability of the deferred tax assets, our audit procedures included evaluating the methodology used, testing the reasonableness of the key assumptions noted above in the Company’s forecast of taxable income, and testing the underlying data used by the Company. In conjunction with our specialists, we compared management’s key assumptions to market data and historical results, evaluating the likelihood of realization under multiple possible scenarios. Additionally, we involved our tax specialists in evaluating the forecast and the timing of deferred tax assets reversal.

/s/Ernst & Young LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2013.

Los Angeles, California

February 26, 2026

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Marcus & Millichap, Inc.

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Marcus & Millichap, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Marcus & Millichap, Inc. (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes and our report dated February 26, 2026 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Los Angeles, California

February 26, 2026

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.