C4 Therapeutics, Inc.

Note 1. Nature of the business

We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company dedicated to delivering on the promise of TPD science to create a new generation of small-molecule medicines that transform patients’ lives. By leveraging our proprietary TORPEDO platform, we have the capability to efficiently design and optimize small molecule protein degraders that are highly active against their desired targets by harnessing the body’s natural process for destroying unwanted proteins. To date, our platform has produced several novel, oral, highly catalytic and brain penetrant degraders that have demonstrated robust target degradation, several of which are progressing through clinical development and have the potential to overcome drug resistance often seen with inhibitors and improve patient outcomes.

Our clinical pipeline is comprised of two oncology programs which our research efforts are focused on inflammation, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration. Additionally, our partnership strategy allows us to further expand our reach in both oncology and non-oncology indications.

The Company was incorporated in Delaware on October 7, 2015 and has its principal office in Watertown, Massachusetts.

Liquidity and capital resources

Since its inception, the Company’s primary activities have been focused on performing research and development activities, building the Company’s intellectual property, recruiting personnel, and raising capital to support these activities. To date, the Company has funded its operations primarily with proceeds received from the sales of redeemable convertible preferred stock, public offerings of the Company’s common stock, equity issuances, through its collaboration agreements, and debt financing.

The Company has incurred recurring losses since its inception, including net losses of $105.0 million and $105.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. In addition, as of December 31, 2025, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $738.7 million. To date, the Company has not generated any revenue from product sales as none of its product candidates has been approved for commercialization. The Company expects to continue to generate operating losses for the foreseeable future.

The Company expects that its cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities of $297.1 million as of December 31, 2025 will be sufficient to fund its operations for at least the next twelve months from the date of issuance of these consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a basis that assumes the Company will continue as a going concern and contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the ordinary course of business.

Risks and uncertainties

The Company is subject to risks common to other life science companies in the early development stage including, but not limited to, uncertainty of ability to raise additional financing, product development and commercialization, development by its competitors of new technological innovations, dependence on key personnel, market acceptance of products, lack of marketing and sales history, product liability, protection of proprietary technology and intellectual property, and compliance with the Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, and other government regulations. If the Company does not successfully advance its programs into and through human clinical trials and commercialize any of its product candidates either directly or through collaborations with other companies, the Company may be unable to produce product revenue or achieve profitability. There can be no assurance that the Company’s research and development efforts will be successful, adequate protection for the Company’s intellectual property will be obtained, any products developed will obtain necessary government regulatory approval, or any approved products will be commercially viable. Even if the Company’s product development efforts are successful, it is uncertain when, if ever, the Company will generate significant revenue from product sales. The Company operates in an environment of rapid change in technology and substantial competition from pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies.

Note 2. Summary of significant accounting policies

Basis of presentation

The Company has prepared the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, or U.S. GAAP. Any reference in these notes to applicable guidance is meant to refer to the authoritative U.S. GAAP as found in the Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, and Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, of the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB.

Principles of consolidation

The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of C4 Therapeutics, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, C4T Securities Corporation, a Massachusetts securities corporation. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on historical experience when available and on various factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. This process may result in actual results differing materially from those estimated amounts used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements if these results differ from historical experience or other assumptions do not turn out to be substantially accurate, even if such assumptions are reasonable when made. Areas where management uses subjective judgment include, but are not limited to, amounts and timing of revenues recognized under the Company’s research and development collaboration arrangements, prepaid and accrued research and development expense, estimates of the useful lives of long-lived assets, assessments of the impairment of long-lived assets, measurement of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities, incremental borrowing rate used in the measurement of lease liability, and valuation and recognition of share-based compensation expense. The Company assesses estimates on an ongoing basis, and bases its estimates on historical experience, known trends and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

Segments

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate and discrete information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker in deciding how to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company hasone operating segment. The Company’s chief operating decision maker, its Chief Executive Officer, manages the Company’s operations on a consolidated basis for the purpose of allocating resources. All of the Company’s long-lived assets are held in the United States.

Cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. The Company’s cash equivalents are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

Restricted cash

Restricted cash consists of cash placed in a separate restricted bank account as required under the terms of the Company’s lease agreement for its Watertown, Massachusetts facilities, as further described within Note 6, Leases.

Marketable securities

The Company classifies marketable securities with a remaining maturity of greater than three months at the date of purchase as available-for-sale. Marketable securities with a remaining maturity date greater than one year are classified as non-current assets. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value with the unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income as a component of stockholders’ equity until realized. Any premium or discount arising at purchase is amortized and/or accreted to interest income and/or expense over the life of the instrument. Realized gains and losses are determined using the specific identification method and are included in other income (expense).

Concentrations of credit risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities, and restricted cash. The Company may maintain deposits in financial institutions in excess of government insured limits. The Company believes that it is not exposed to significant credit risk as its deposits are held at financial institutions that management believes to be of high credit quality, and the Company has not experienced any losses on these deposits. Additionally, the Company has established guidelines relative to credit ratings and maturities intended to safeguard principal balances and maintain liquidity. The Company maintains its funds in accordance with its investment policy, which defines allowable investments, specifies credit quality standards and is designed to limit credit exposure to any single issuer.

Fair value of financial instruments

ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, or ASC 820, establishes a fair value hierarchy for instruments measured at fair value that distinguishes between assumptions based on market data (observable inputs) and the Company’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). Observable inputs are those that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability and are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. ASC 820 identifies fair value as the exchange price or exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, ASC 820 establishes a three-tier value hierarchy that distinguishes between the following:

•Level 1—Observable inputs that reflect quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

•Level 2—Inputs other than Level 1 inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.

•Level 3—Unobservable inputs, which are supported by little or no market activity, and may be developed using estimates of assumptions developed by the Company, which reflect those that a market participant may use.

To the extent the valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair values requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized as Level 3. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company evaluates transfers between levels at the end of each reporting period.

Property and equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. When assets are retired or disposed of, the assets and related accumulated depreciation are derecognized from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is included in the determination of net loss.

Depreciation on equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

Leases

The Company accounts for leases in accordance with ASC Topic 842, Leases, or ASC 842. At the inception of an arrangement, the Company determines whether the arrangement is or contains a lease based on specific facts and circumstances present, the existence of an identified asset(s), if any, and the Company’s control over the use of the identified asset(s), if applicable. As provided by ASC 842, the Company elected to combine lease and non-lease components as a single component for all leases. Operating lease liabilities and their corresponding right-of-use assets are recorded based on the present value of future lease payments over the expected lease term. Certain adjustments to the right-of-use asset may be required for items such as incentives received. The Company typically only includes an initial lease term in its assessment of a lease arrangement; options to renew a lease are not included in the assessment unless there is reasonable certainty that the Company will renew. The interest rate implicit in lease contracts is typically not readily determinable. As such, in calculating the lease liability, the Company utilizes its incremental borrowing rate, which is the rate incurred to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. Lease expense is recognized over the expected lease term on a straight-line basis.

Impairment of long-lived assets

The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset.

If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceed the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

Warrants

The Company accounts for warrants as either equity-classified or liability-classified instruments based on an assessment of the warrant’s specific terms and applicable authoritative guidance in ASC 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” (“ASC 480”), and ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”). The assessment considers whether the warrants are freestanding financial instruments pursuant to ASC 480, meet the definition of a liability pursuant to ASC 480, and whether the warrants meet all of the requirements for equity classification under ASC 815, including whether the warrants are indexed to the Company’s own ordinary shares and whether warrant holders could potentially require “net cash settlement” in a circumstance outside of the Company’s control, among other conditions for equity classification. This assessment, which requires the use of professional judgment, is conducted at the time of warrant issuance and as of each subsequent quarterly period end-date while the warrants are outstanding.

For issued or modified warrants that meet all the criteria for equity classification, the warrants are required to be recorded as a component of equity at the time of issuance. For issued or modified warrants that do not meet all the criteria for equity classification, the warrants are required to be recorded as liabilities at their initial fair value on the date of issuance, and each balance sheet date thereafter. Changes in the estimated fair value of warrants classified as liabilities are recognized as a non-cash gain or loss on the statements of operations.

The Pre-Funded Warrants, Class A Warrants, and Class B warrants that the Company issued in conjunction with the 2025 Offering met the criteria for equity classification under ASC 815 and were classified as equity.

Commitments and contingencies

Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred, and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Legal costs incurred in connection with loss contingencies are expensed as incurred.

Revenue recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, or ASC 606. This standard applies to all contracts with customers, except for contracts that are within the scope of other standards. Under ASC 606, an entity recognizes revenue when its customer obtains control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services.

The Company enters into collaboration and licensing agreements with strategic partners, which are within the scope of ASC 606, under which it may exclusively license rights to research, develop, manufacture, and commercialize its product candidates to third parties. The terms of these arrangements typically include payment to the Company of one or more of the following: (1) non-refundable, upfront license fees; (2) reimbursement of certain costs; (3) customer option fees for additional goods or services; (4) development milestone payments; (5) regulatory and commercial milestone payments; and (6) royalties on net sales of licensed products.

In determining the appropriate amount of revenue to be recognized as it fulfills its obligations under each of its agreements, the Company performs the following steps: (i) identification of the promised goods or services in the contract; (ii) determination of whether the promised goods or services are performance obligations including whether they are distinct in the context of the contract; (iii) measurement of the transaction price, including the constraint on variable consideration; (iv) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations; and (v) recognition of revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies each performance obligation. As part of the accounting for these arrangements, the Company must use its judgment to determine: (a) the number of performance obligations based on the determination under step (ii) above; (b) the transaction price under step (iii) above; (c) the stand-alone selling price for each performance obligation identified in the contract for the allocation of transaction price in step (iv) above; and (d) the contract term and pattern of satisfaction of the performance obligations under step (v) above. The Company uses judgment to determine whether milestones or other variable consideration, except for royalties, should be included in the transaction price as described further below. The transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation on a relative stand-alone selling price basis, for which the Company recognizes revenue as or when the performance obligations under the contract are satisfied.

Amounts due to the Company for satisfying the revenue recognition criteria or that are contractually due based upon the terms of the collaboration agreements are recorded as accounts receivable in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

Amounts received prior to satisfying the revenue recognition criteria are recorded as deferred revenue in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. Amounts expected to be recognized as revenue within the 12 months following the balance sheet date are classified as current deferred revenue. Amounts not expected to be recognized as revenue within the 12 months following the balance sheet date are classified as deferred revenue, net of current portion.

Upfront license fees

If the license to the Company’s intellectual property is determined to be distinct from the other promises or performance obligations identified in the arrangement, the Company recognizes revenue from non-refundable, upfront fees allocated to the license when the license is transferred to the customer and the customer is able to use and benefit from the license. In assessing whether a promise or performance obligation is distinct from the other promises, the Company considers factors such as the research, manufacturing, and commercialization capabilities of the customer; the retention of any key rights by the Company; and the availability of the associated expertise in the general marketplace. In addition, the Company considers whether the customer can benefit from a promise for its intended purpose without the receipt of the remaining promises, whether the value of the promise is dependent on the unsatisfied promise, whether there are other vendors that could provide the remaining promise and whether it is separately identifiable from the remaining promise. For licenses that are combined with other promises, the Company exercises judgment to assess the nature of the combined performance obligation to determine whether the combined performance obligation is satisfied over time or at a point in time and, if over time, the appropriate method of measuring progress for purposes of recognizing revenue. The Company evaluates the measure of progress each reporting period and, if necessary, adjusts the measure of performance and related revenue recognition.

Customer options

If an arrangement is determined to contain customer options that allow the customer to acquire additional goods or services, the goods and services underlying the customer options are not considered to be performance obligations at the outset of the arrangement, as they are contingent upon option exercise. The Company evaluates the customer options for material rights or options to acquire additional goods or services for free or at a discount. If the customer options are determined to represent a material right, the material right is recognized as a separate performance obligation at the outset of the arrangement. The Company allocates the transaction price to material rights based on the relative standalone selling price, which is determined based on the identified discount and the probability that the customer will exercise the option. Amounts allocated to a material right are not recognized as revenue until, at the earliest, the option is exercised. If an option is not exercised and the target is terminated, the Company will accelerate and recognize all remaining revenue related to the material right performance obligation.

Research and development services

The promises under the Company’s collaboration agreements may include research and development services to be performed by the Company for or on behalf of the customer. Payments or reimbursements resulting from the Company’s research and development efforts are recognized as the services are performed and presented on a gross basis because the Company is the principal for such efforts. Reimbursements from and payments to the customer that are the result of a collaborative relationship with the customer, instead of a customer relationship, such as co-development activities, are recorded as a reduction to research and development expense.

Milestone payments

At the inception of each arrangement that includes development milestone payments, the Company evaluates whether the milestones are considered probable of being achieved and estimates the amount to be included in the transaction price using the most likely amount method. If it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur, the associated milestone value is included in the transaction price. Milestone payments that are not within the control of the Company or the licensee, such as regulatory approvals, are not considered probable of being achieved until those approvals are received. The Company evaluates factors such as the scientific, clinical, regulatory, commercial and other risks that must be overcome to achieve the particular milestone in making this assessment. There is considerable judgment involved in determining whether it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur. At the end of each subsequent reporting period, the Company reevaluates the probability of achievement of all milestones subject to constraint and, if necessary, adjusts its estimate of the overall transaction price. Any such adjustments are recorded on a cumulative catch-up basis, which would affect revenues and earnings in the period of adjustment.

For further discussion of accounting for collaboration revenues, see Note 8. Collaboration and license agreements.

Research and development expenses

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and consist of the costs associated with conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials, which primarily include salaries, stock-based compensation and other employee benefit expenses, lab related supplies and other operational costs related to the Company’s research and development activities, including allocated facility-related expenses and external costs of outside vendors engaged to conduct research and development activities.

Clinical trial costs are a significant component of the Company's research and development expenses. The Company historically has contracted with third parties that perform various clinical trial activities on behalf of the Company in the ongoing development of the Company's product candidates. As part of the process of preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Company is required to estimate their accrued research and development expenses. The Company makes estimates of the accrued expenses as of each balance sheet date in the consolidated financial statements based on facts and circumstances known at that time, and include reviewing open contracts and purchase orders, communicating with its personnel to identify services that have been performed on its behalf and estimating the level of service performed and the associated costs incurred for the services when the Company has not yet been invoiced or otherwise notified of the actual costs. If contracted amounts with third parties are modified (for instance, as a result of changes in the clinical trial protocol or scope of work to be performed), the Company will modify the related accruals accordingly on a prospective basis. Revisions in the scope of a contract are charged to expense in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become reasonably certain.

In addition, there may be instances in which payments made to the Company’s vendors will exceed the level of services provided and result in a prepayment of the expense, in which case such amounts are reflected as prepaid expenses and other current assets. In accruing service fees, the Company estimates the time period over which services will be performed and the level of effort to be expended in each period. If the actual timing of the performance of services or the level of effort varies from the estimate, the Company adjusts the accrual or the amount of prepaid expenses accordingly. Nonrefundable advance payments for goods or services to be received in the future for use in research and development activities are deferred and capitalized in prepaid expenses and other current assets. The capitalized amounts are expensed as the related goods are delivered or the services are performed.

Stock-based compensation

The Company applies ASC Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation, or ASC 718, to account for its stock-based payments. In accordance with the ASC 718, the Company determines whether an award should be classified and accounted for as a liability award or an equity award. All of the Company's grants of stock-based awards to employees were classified as equity awards and are recognized in the Company's financial statements based on the grant date fair value measured using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option pricing model estimates the fair value of the equity award using the expected term, expected volatility, risk-free interest rate, dividend rate, and the fair value of the common stock underlying the stock-based award.

•The Company estimates the expected term using the “simplified” method, whereby, the expected term equals the arithmetic average of the vesting term and the contractual term of the option.

•Due to the lack of sufficient company-specific historical and implied volatility data, the Company has based its computation of expected volatility on the historical volatility of a representative group of public companies with similar characteristics to the Company, including stage of product development and life science industry focus.

•The risk-free interest rates for periods within the expected life of the option were based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect during the period the options were granted.

•The expected dividend yield is assumed to bezero as the Company has never paid dividends and currently has no plans to pay any dividends on its common stock.

•The fair value of the common stock underlying shared-based awards is the quoted market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant.

•The Company recognizes forfeitures as they occur.

The fair value of the awards are recognized as stock-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the awards, which is generally the vesting period. For awards subject to both performance and service-based vesting conditions, the Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense over the remaining service period if the performance condition is considered probable of achievement using management’s best estimates. Stock-based compensation expense is classified in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss in the same manner in which the award recipients’ payroll costs are classified or in which the award recipients’ service payments are classified.

A change in any of the terms or conditions of an equity award is accounted for as a modification of the award. Incremental compensation cost is measured as the excess, if any, of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before its terms are modified, measured based on the fair value of the awards and other pertinent factors at the modification date. For vested awards, the Company recognizes incremental compensation cost in the period the modification occurs. For unvested awards, the Company recognizes the expense over the remaining requisite service period, the sum of the incremental compensation cost and the remaining unrecognized compensation cost for the original award on the modification date. If the fair value of the modified award is lower than the fair value of the original award immediately before modification, the minimum compensation cost the Company recognizes is the cost of the original award.

Income taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequence of events that have been recognized in the consolidated financial statements or the Company’s tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the consolidated financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded in the provision for income taxes. The Company assesses the likelihood that its deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent it believes, based upon the weight of available evidence, that it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is established.

The Company evaluates its uncertain tax positions using the provisions of ASC Topic 740, Income taxes, or ASC 740, which prescribes a recognition threshold that a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the consolidated financial statements by using a "more-likely-than-not" criteria for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The provision for income taxes includes the effects of any resulting tax reserves, or unrecognized tax benefits, which are considered appropriate as well as the related net interest and penalties.

Comprehensive loss

Comprehensive loss is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Comprehensive loss includes net loss as well as other changes in stockholders’ equity which includes certain changes in equity that are excluded from net loss. The Company’s only element of other comprehensive income is unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities.

Net loss per share

The Company applies the two-class method to compute basic and diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders when it has issued shares that meet the definition of participating securities. The two-class method determines net income (loss) per share for each class of common and participating securities according to dividends declared or accumulated and participation rights in undistributed earnings. The two-class method requires income (loss) available to common stockholders for the period to be allocated between common and participating securities based upon their respective rights to share in the earnings as if all income (loss) for the period had been distributed. The Company’s pre-funded warrants, Class A warrants, and Class B warrants participate in any dividends declared by the Company and are therefore considered to be participating securities. The participating securities are not required to participate in the losses of the Company, and therefore during periods of loss there is no allocation required under the two-class method.

Basic net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders is computed by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders is computed by adjusting net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders to reallocate undistributed earnings based on the potential impact of dilutive securities. Diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders is computed by dividing the diluted net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period, including potential dilutive common shares. The Company computes diluted (loss) earnings per share after giving consideration to the dilutive effect of stock options and unvested restricted stock that are outstanding during the period, except where such securities would be anti-dilutive.

Common stock equivalent shares are excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share if their effect is antidilutive. In periods in which the Company reports a net loss, diluted net loss per share is generally the same as basic net loss per share since dilutive common shares are not assumed to have been issued if their effect is anti-dilutive.

Going concern

At each reporting period, the Company evaluates whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the consolidated financial statements are issued. The Company is required to make certain additional disclosures if it concludes substantial doubt exists and it is not alleviated by the Company’s plans or when its plans alleviate substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s evaluation entails analyzing prospective operating budgets and forecasts for expectations of the Company’s cash needs and comparing those needs to the current cash, cash equivalent, and marketable securities balances.

Recently adopted accounting standards

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, or ASU 2023-09. ASU 2023-09 requires a company's annual financial statements to include consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation, and income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction. ASU 2023-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. Adoption is either with a prospective method or a fully retrospective method of transition.

The Company has adopted Accounting Standards Update 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”) for the year ended December 31, 2025, and applied the new disclosure requirements prospectively to the current annual period. Prior period disclosures have not been adjusted to reflect the new disclosure requirements. Please see additional disclosures related to income taxes in Note 12, Income Taxes, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Recently issued accounting standards

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, or ASU 2024-03. ASU 2024-03 requires enhanced disclosures of disaggregated income statement expenses. Disclosure within the notes of the financial statements for each annual and interim period should include: employee compensation, depreciation, and intangible asset amortization, included in each relevant expense caption; certain amounts that are already required to be disclosed under current GAAP in the same disclosure as the other disaggregation requirement; a qualitative description of the amounts remaining in relevant expense captions that are not separately disaggregated quantitatively; and the total amount of selling expenses and, in annual reporting periods, an entity’s definition of selling expenses. ASU 2024-03 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that adoption of ASU 2024-03 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 3. Fair value measurements

The following tables present information about the Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and indicates the level of the fair value hierarchy utilized to determine such fair values as of December 31, 2025 (in thousands):

The following table sets forth the fair value of the Company’s financial assets by level within the fair value hierarchy at December 31, 2024 (in thousands):

The Company classifies its money market funds, which are valued based on quoted market prices in active markets, with no valuation adjustment, as Level 1 assets within the fair value hierarchy.

Marketable securities consist of U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government debt securities, and corporate debt securities, all of which are classified as available-for-sale pursuant to ASC 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities. Marketable securities are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date, and fair value is determined using models or other valuation methodologies on a recurring basis.

Note 4. Marketable securities

Marketable securities at December 31, 2025 consisted of the following (in thousands):

Marketable securities at December 31, 2024 consisted of the following (in thousands):

Marketable securities classified as current have maturities of less than one year. Marketable securities classified as non-current are those that: (i) have a maturity of greater than one year, and (ii) the Company does not intend to liquidate within the next twelve months, although these funds are available for use and, therefore, are classified as available-for-sale. No available-for-sale debt securities held as of December 31, 2025 or December 31, 2024 had remaining maturities greater than five years.

Marketable securities in unrealized loss positions as of December 31, 2025 consisted of the following (in thousands, except number of securities):

Marketable securities in unrealized loss positions as of December 31, 2024 consisted of the following (in thousands, except number of securities):

Based on factors such as historical experience, market data, issuer-specific factors, and current economic conditions, the Company didnot record an allowance for credit losses at December 31, 2025 and 2024, related to these securities.

Note 5. Property and equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):

Depreciation expense related to property and equipment was as follows (in thousands):

Note 6. Leases

In July 2017, the Company entered into a lease of office and laboratory space for its headquarters in Watertown, Massachusetts, or the Watertown Lease. The Watertown Lease had a non-cancelable term often years with an option to extend forone additional five-year period and is subject to rent escalation throughout the term. Additionally, the Watertown Lease required the Company to provide collateral, which was recorded as restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheets. The Watertown Lease commenced in April 2018. The Watertown Lease was classified as an operating lease and, upon the commencement in April 2018, the Company recorded a lease liability of $15.1 million and a right-of-use asset of $16.7 million, which is inclusive of $1.5 million of construction costs funded by the Company. In initially calculating the lease liability and the right-of-use asset, the Company did not include the additional five-year period option as management did not believe there was reasonable certainty that the Company would exercise the option. In addition to rent, the Company is also responsible for paying its pro rata share of costs incurred for common area maintenance, real estate taxes and property insurance related to the leased space, which are accounted for as variable lease costs.

In November 2021, the Company entered into an amendment to the Watertown Lease, or the Amended Lease. The Amended Lease serves to extend the lease term of the Company’s existing leased space, or the Existing Leased Space, and provides additional office and laboratory space, or the Newly Leased Space. The Amended Lease commenced in January 2022 and the Company’s obligation to pay rent on the Newly Leased Space commenced in March 2022, with the amount of this new rent obligation added to the Company’s continuing obligation to pay rent on the Existing Leased Space. The Amended Lease terminates in March 2032, which is 10 years from the rent commencement date for the Newly Leased Space. The Amended Lease is subject to fixed rate rent escalations, provides for up to $2.6 million in tenant improvements, and provides an option for the Company to extend the lease term of the Amended Lease forone additional five-year period. Upon executing the Amended Lease, the Company increased its collateral to $3.3 million, which is recorded as restricted cash on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2025 and 2024. In addition to rent, under the terms of the Amended Lease, the Company is also responsible for paying its pro rata share of costs incurred for common area maintenance, real estate taxes and property insurance related to the leased space, including both the Existing Leased Space and, as of January 2022, the Newly Leased Space, which amounts are accounted for as variable lease costs.

Accounting for the amended lease

As the Amended Lease extends the term of the Existing Leased Space and provides access to the Newly Leased Space, in accordance with the provisions of ASC 842, the Company accounted for the Amended Lease astwo separate contracts: 1) modification of the existing lease agreement to extend the lease term of the Existing Leased Space, and 2) new lease agreement for the right-of-use of the Newly Leased Space.

As the Company maintained control of the Existing Leased Space upon execution of the Amended Lease, the Company recorded an increase in right-of-use asset and lease liability of $20.1 million related to the new rental payments during the extended term and current incremental borrowing rate of the Existing Leased Space upon execution of the Amended Lease. The calculation of the lease liability and the right-of-use asset of the Existing Leased Space does not include the additional five-year period option as the Company does not believe there is reasonable certainty that the option will be exercised.

As noted above, the lease for the Newly Leased Space commenced in January 2022. As a result, the Company recorded a right-of-use asset of $44.4 million, and a corresponding lease liability of $44.1 million for the Newly Leased Space. The calculation of the lease liability and the right-of-use asset of the Newly Leased Space does not include the additional five-year period option provided under the Amended Lease as the Company does not believe there is reasonable certainty that the option will be exercised. As stated above, the Amended Lease provides for up to $2.6 million of tenant improvement allowance which was used in full in the year ended December 31, 2023.

In May 2022, the Company entered into a sublease agreement with a third party, or the Sublease, for a portion of the office and laboratory space in Suite 200 at 490 Arsenal Way, Watertown, Massachusetts. The term of the Sublease ended in June 2025.

In September 2025, the Company entered into a sublease agreement with a third party, or the 2025 Sublease, for a portion of the office and laboratory space in Suite 200 at 490 Arsenal Way, Watertown, Massachusetts. The term of the 2025

Sublease commences in February 2026 and ends in January 2029, with an option to extend for an additionaltwo year term. This transaction triggered an impairment analysis, which resulted in the recognition of a $10.6 million impairment charge for the Suite 200 right-of-use (ROU) asset for the year ended December 31, 2025.

The impairment charge reduces the carrying value of the associated ROU asset, leasehold improvements and certain furniture and fixture assets that remained in the facility to their estimated fair values. The fair values are estimated using a discounted cash flows approach based on forecasted future cash flows expected to be derived from the property based on current sublease market rent, which is considered a Level 3 input in the fair value hierarchy, and other key assumptions such as future sublease market conditions and the discount rate.

The elements of lease costs were as follows (in thousands):

The following table summarizes the lease term and incremental borrowing rate applied in arriving at the lease liability:

Future lease payments under non-cancelable leases as of December 31, 2025 for each of the years ending December 31 are as follows (in thousands):

Note 7. Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

Note 8. Collaboration and license agreements

Pfizer Collaboration and Supply Agreement

On September 30, 2025, the Company entered into a Clinical Trial Collaboration and Supply Agreement, or the Pfizer Agreement, with Pfizer, Inc., or Pfizer. Pursuant to the Pfizer Agreement, Pfizer will supply the Company with elranatamab (ELREXFIO®), a B-cell maturation antigen CD3 targeted bispecific antibody, for the Company's upcoming Phase 1b trial evaluating the safety and tolerability of cemsidomide, an IKZF1/3 degrader, and dexamethasone in combination with elranatamab as a second-line or later therapy for patients with multiple myeloma. Under the terms of the Pfizer Agreement, Pfizer will supply elranatamab for use in the trial at no cost to the Company and the Company will sponsor, conduct and pay the costs of the trial. The Pfizer Agreement provides that the Company and Pfizer will jointly own clinical data generated from the trial. The collaboration is managed by a joint development committee responsible for coordinating all regulatory and other activities under the Pfizer Agreement. Under the terms of the Pfizer Agreement, each party has various termination rights under certain circumstances, including material breach, insolvency, and other customary provisions, subject to certain conditions.

Merck KGaA Collaboration and License Agreement

On March 1, 2024, the Company entered into a license and collaboration agreement, or the Merck KGaA Agreement, with Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, or Merck KGaA, to discovertwo targeted protein degraders against critical oncogenic proteins.

Under the terms of the Merck KGaA Agreement, the Company granted Merck KGaA a worldwide, exclusive license under certain of the Company's intellectual property rights to develop, manufacture, and commercializetwo targeted protein degraders against critical oncogenic proteins within the KRAS family. Merck KGaA is responsible for all development, regulatory approval, manufacturing and commercialization costs. Under the terms of the Merck KGaA Agreement, Merck KGaA agreed to make an upfront cash payment of $16.0 million and to fund the Company's discovery research efforts. The Company is eligible to receive approximately $740.0 million in the aggregate in discovery, regulatory, and commercial milestone payments across the collaboration, plus tiered royalties on net sales. Royalties payable from Merck KGaA to the Company range from mid-single digit to low-double digit percentages, subject to reductions under certain circumstances as described in the Merck KGaA Agreement. In April 2025, the Company earned a $1.0 million milestone for the achievement of a discovery milestone for one of the active collaboration targets, which resulted in the addition of $1.0 million to the transaction price for the collaboration.

The collaboration is managed by a joint research committee, or Merck KGaA JRC, and a joint steering committee, or Merck KGaA JSC, each of which is comprised of representatives of Merck KGaA and the Company. Under the Merck KGaA Agreement, Merck KGaA has final decision-making authority over the Merck KGaA JSC, which has the authority to decide matters that cannot be resolved by the Merck KGaA JRC. Merck KGaA may terminate the Merck KGaA Agreement on a project-by-project basis or in its entirety upon 60 days’ prior written notice. Each party also has various termination rights under certain circumstances, including but not limited to patent challenges, insolvency, or a material breach by the other party, subject to certain conditions. As the research activities with Merck KGaA have progressed and evolved over time, there is nowone target on which the parties continue to collaborate.

Merck KGaA Agreement Accounting

The Company identifiedtwo performance obligations at the outset of the Merck KGaA Agreement, represented by thetwo potential research and development targets. While the Company is obligated under the Merck KGaA Agreement to provide the exclusive license and perform certain research activities, the Company determined that the license, the research activities, and participation on the Merck KGaA JRC and Merck KGaA JSC are considered promised services. Participation on the Merck KGaA JRC and Merck KGaA JSC to oversee the research activities contemplated under the Merck KGaA Agreement were determined to be quantitatively and qualitatively immaterial and, therefore, were excluded from the performance obligations. The total transaction price of the Merck KGaA Agreement is allocated to the performance obligations based on their relative standalone selling price. The Company recognizes the transaction price allocated to the performance obligations as the research and development services are provided, using an input method, in proportion to costs incurred to date for each research development target as compared to total costs incurred and expected to be incurred in the future to satisfy the underlying obligation. Incremental fees for research and development services are paid at agreed upon FTE rates and recognized as revenue in the period incurred.

As of December 31, 2025, the total transaction price of $17.0 million is allocated to theone remaining performance obligation and $3.9 million remains unsatisfied.

Amounts due to the Company that have not yet been received are recorded as accounts receivable and amounts received that have not yet been recognized as revenue are recorded in deferred revenue on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Betta Pharma License and Collaboration Agreement

On May 29, 2023, the Company entered into a license and collaboration agreement, or the Betta Pharma License Agreement, with Betta Pharmaceuticals, Co. Ltd., or Betta Pharma, to collaborateon the development, manufacturing, and commercialization of CFT8919 in Greater China, comprised of mainland China, Hong Kong SAR, Macau SAR and Taiwan, with the Company retaining rights to CFT8919 in the rest of the world other than Greater China, or the C4T Territory.

Under the terms of the Betta Pharma License Agreement, the Company granted Betta Pharma an exclusive license under certain of the Company's intellectual property rights to develop, manufacture and commercialize CFT8919 for all uses in humans in Greater China. Betta Pharma is responsible for all development, regulatory approval, manufacturing and commercialization costs in Greater China except where Betta Pharma acts as the Company's agent in Greater China in connection with a global trial sponsored by the Company. As part of the collaboration, Betta Pharma made an upfront cash payment of $10.0 million to the Company and has agreed to make up to $357.0 million in aggregate milestone payments, plus tiered royalties on net sales of CFT8919 in Greater China. These payments are subject to a withholding tax by the State Taxing Authority of the People's Republic of China. Royalties payable from Betta Pharma to the Company range from low to mid double-digit percent, subject to certain reductions under certain circumstances as described in the Betta Pharma License Agreement. In addition, as part of the collaboration, the Company has agreed to make milestone payments to Betta Pharma of up to $40.0 million following the Company's receipt of approval of a New Drug Application for CFT8919 from the FDA, with the milestone amount based on the percentage of patients in contemplated clinical trials that were enrolled by Betta Pharma and the line of therapy of the approval. In addition, the Company has agreed to pay Betta Pharma tiered royalties on net sales of CFT8919 in the C4T Territory in the low single digit percent range, subject to reductions under certain circumstances as described in the Betta Pharma License Agreement.

In connection with the execution of the Betta Pharma License Agreement, the Company, Betta Pharma, and an affiliate of Betta Pharma, Betta Investment (Hong Kong) Limited, or Betta Investment, entered into a stock purchase agreement dated May 29, 2023, or the Betta Stock Purchase Agreement, and together with the Betta Pharma License Agreement, or the Betta Agreements, pursuant to which Betta Investment agreed to purchase 5,567,928 shares of the Company's common stock, or the Shares, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $25.0 million, or $4.49 per share, which represented a 25% premium over the 60-trading-day volume weighted average closing price as oftwo trading days prior to the effective date of the Betta Stock Purchase Agreement. The closing under the Betta Stock Purchase Agreement occurred on January 4, 2024. The $25.0 million of proceeds that the Company received were recorded as $20.0 million for the issuance of shares, with the remaining $5.0 million of premium paid on the share price recorded as consideration for revenue under the Betta Pharma License and Collaboration Agreement. The Betta Stock Purchase Agreement has certain restrictions customary to agreements of this nature. Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 12, 2024 and information known to the Company as of December 31, 2025, the Company believes that Betta Investment beneficially owns 4,874,550 shares of the Company’s common stock. Following the Offering (as defined Note 9), Betta Investment is no longer considered a related party to the Company based on its current holdings.

The collaboration is managed by a joint steering committee, which is composed of representatives from both Betta Pharma and the Company. Following the completion of the dose escalation phase of the Phase 1 trial of CFT8919, Betta Pharma may terminate the Betta Pharma License Agreement for convenience upon at least 90 days’ prior written notice. Each party also has various termination rights under certain circumstances, including but not limited to regulatory safety stoppages, patent challenges, insolvency, or a material breach by the other party, subject to certain conditions.

Betta Agreements accounting

The Company expects to recognize revenue under the Betta Agreements from one type of arrangement, the licensing agreement. The Betta Agreements will consist of the following activities: (1) license of intellectual property, (2) clinical supply agreement, (3) manufacturing technology transfer, and (4) commercial manufacturing supply agreement. The clinical supply agreement, or the Betta Pharma Supply Agreement, was signed on August 31, 2024. The Company recognizes the transaction price allocated to the performance obligation as the costs related to manufactured clinical supply are incurred, using an input method, in proportion to costs incurred to date as compared to total costs incurred and expected to be incurred in the future to satisfy the underlying obligation. The clinical manufacturing costs are paid at agreed upon rates and included in the estimated transaction price. The estimated transaction price as of December 31, 2025 is$125.0 million, consisting of the $10.0 million upfront cash consideration, $5.0 million from the closing of the Betta Stock Purchase Agreement, a $2.0 million milestone achieved in December 2023 under the Betta Pharma License Agreement, and the estimated consideration expected to be received from the manufactured clinical supply of $108.0 million. This estimate includes a number of assumptions, including but not limited to the duration and total volume of clinical supply to be provided by the Company pursuant to the Betta Pharma Supply Agreement. In the event there are fluctuations in the Company's assumptions, the estimates of consideration expected to be received pursuant to the Betta Pharma Supply Agreement will also change. Due to scientific and technical uncertainties of the clinical trials, the Company cannot be certain that this amount will be recognized as revenue in future periods.

Amounts due to the Company that have not yet been received are recorded as accounts receivable and amounts received that have not yet been recognized as revenue are recorded as deferred revenue on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

Roche Collaboration and License Agreement

In March 2016, the Company entered into a license agreement with Roche, which was amended in June 2016 and again in March 2017. The Company and Roche amended and restated that agreement (as so amended) in December 2018. This amended and restated agreement is referred to as the Roche Agreement. Under the Roche Agreement, the Company and Roche agreed to collaborate in the research, development, manufacture and commercialization of target-binding degrader medicines using the Company’s proprietary TORPEDO platform for the treatment of cancers and other indications. Under the Roche Agreement, the Company may elect to opt into certain co-development rights, in which case the Company will receive an increased royalty rate on future product sales from products directed to that target. In addition, if the Company opts into certain co-detailing rights, it is also entitled to reimbursement of certain commercialization costs. Upon entry into the Roche Agreement, the Company received additional upfront consideration of $40.0 million.

In November 2020, the Company signed a further amendment, the effect of which was to provide that the parties would develop up tofive potential targets, with Roche maintaining its option rights to license and commercialize products directed to those targets. The November 2020 amendment also provides a mechanism through which the Company and Roche can mutually agree to terminate the Roche Agreement on a target-by-target basis by the entry into a Mutual Target Termination Agreement. Upon the entry into a Mutual Target Termination Agreement, the Roche Agreement provides that all rights and responsibilities for know-how and other intellectual property in support of products that use inhibition as their mode of action revert to Roche and all rights and responsibilities for know-how and other intellectual property in support of products that use degradation as their mode of action revert to the Company. In support of this allocation of rights, Roche provides the Company, and the Company provides Roche, with a perpetual irrevocable, fully paid up, exclusive (even as to party granting the license), sublicensable (including in multiple tiers) license to the patents and know-how that are allocated to a party under a Mutual Target Termination Agreement. As the research activities with Roche have progressed and evolved over time, there are nowtwo targets on which the parties continue to collaborate, with Roche maintaining its option rights to license and commercialize products directed to thosetwo targets. In December 2023, the Company signed a second amendment to the Roche Agreement, the effect of which was to update the terms of the agreement as it pertains to thetwo targets on which the parties continue to collaborate. Under the second amendment to the Roche Agreement, Roche retains its option rights to license and commercialize products directed to those targets but the timing of its option rights are adjusted to begin upon Roche's receipt of the dose range finding data package. There was no material impact to the accounting in 2023 as a result of the second amendment to the Roche Agreement.

Under the Roche Agreement, as amended, the Company receives annual research plan payments of $1.0 million for each active research plan. For thetwo targets that remain under collaboration among the parties, Roche is required to pay the Company fees of $2.0 million upon the progression of targets to the lead series identification achievement phase. In March 2025, the Company achieved this $2.0 million milestone for each of the active collaboration targets, which resulted in the addition of $4.0 million to the transaction price for the collaboration. In the event Roche exercises its option rights as to one of these targets, Roche is required to pay the Company an option exercise fee of $8.0 million.

Under the Roche Agreement, as amended, for each target option exercised by Roche, the Company is eligible to receive milestone payments up to $273.0 million upon the achievement of certain development milestones with respect to corresponding products, subject to certain reductions and exclusions based on intellectual property coverage. Roche is also required to pay the Company up to $150.0 million per target in one-time sales-based milestone payments upon the achievement of specified levels of net sales of a product directed to such target. Finally, Roche is required to pay the Company tiered royalties ranging from the mid-single digits to mid-teen percentages on net sales of products sold by Roche pursuant to its exercise of its option rights, subject to certain reductions. For sales of products for which the Company exercises its co-development right, the applicable royalty rates will be increased by a low-single digit percentage.

The collaboration is managed by a joint research committee, or Roche JRC. The Company has control over the Roche JRC prior to Roche’s exercise of its option rights as to a particular target, with Roche assuming control of the Roche JRC thereafter, Roche may terminate the Roche Agreement on a target-by-target or product-by-product basis under several scenarios, upon at least 90 days’ prior written notice. Each party also has various termination rights under certain circumstances, including but not limited to insolvency or a material breach by the other party, subject to certain conditions.

Roche Agreement accounting

At commencement, the Company identified twelve performance obligations within the Roche Agreement, represented by thesix potential research and development targets then included in the collaboration and the option rights held by Roche for each of thosesix targets. A non-exclusive royalty-free license to use the Company’s intellectual property to conduct research and development activities, and participation on the Roche JRC were identified as promised services. However, the Company determined that the research and development license and research and development services were not distinct from one another, and participation on the Roche JRC was determined to be quantitatively and qualitatively immaterial.

The total transaction price of the Roche Agreement is allocated to the performance obligations based on their relative standalone selling price. The allocated transaction price is recognized as revenue from collaboration agreements in one of two ways:

•Research and development targets: The Company recognizes the portion of the transaction price allocated to each of the research and development performance obligations as the research and development services are provided, using an input method, in proportion to costs incurred to date for each research development target as compared to total costs incurred and expected to be incurred in the future to satisfy the underlying obligation related to said research and development target. The transfer of control occurs over this period and, in management’s judgment, is the best measure of progress towards satisfying the performance obligation.

•Option rights: The transaction price allocated to the options rights, which are considered material rights, is recognized in the period that Roche elects to exercise or elects to not exercise its option right to license and commercialize the underlying research and development target.

The following table summarizes the allocation of the total transaction price to the identified performance obligations under the arrangement, and the amount of the transaction price unsatisfied as of December 31, 2025 (in thousands):

Amounts due to the Company that have not yet been received are recorded as accounts receivable and amounts received that have not yet been recognized as revenue are recorded as deferred revenue on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

Merck License and Collaboration Agreement

On December 11, 2023, the Company and Merck Sharp & Dohme, LLC, or Merck, entered into an exclusive license and collaboration agreement, or the Merck Agreement, to develop degrader-antibody conjugates, or DACs, an emerging modality designed to selectively target and neutralize disease-causing proteins in cancer cells. The Merck Agreement was terminated by Merck, effective late November 2025.

Under the terms of the Merck Agreement, the Company received a$10.0 million upfront payment in January 2024.

Merck Agreement Accounting

The Company identifiedone performance obligation at the outset of the Merck Agreement, which consists of: (1) the exclusive license and (2) the research activities for the initial undisclosed oncology target and the joint research plan. The Company determined that the license and research activities were not distinct from one another, as the license had limited value without the performance of the research activities by the Company. Participation on the Merck JRC to oversee the research activities and the technology transfer associated with the Merck Agreement were determined to be quantitatively and qualitatively immaterial and therefore were excluded from performance obligations. The Company recognized the transaction price allocated to this performance obligation as the research and development services were provided, using an input method, in proportion to costs incurred for each research development target as compared to total costs incurred and expected to be incurred in the future to satisfy the underlying obligation. The transfer of control occurs over this period and, in management’s judgment, was the best measure of progress towards satisfying the performance obligation.

As of December 31, 2025, the total transaction price of$10.0 million was allocated to the research and development services performance obligation and has been fully recognized.

Biogen Collaboration Research and License Agreement

In December 2018, the Company entered into a collaboration research and license agreement, or the Biogen Agreement, with Biogen MA, Inc., or Biogen. In February 2020, the Company and Biogen amended the Biogen Agreement to provide further clarity around Biogen’s ownership of target binding moieties (which are portions of molecules), and any related intellectual property that are directed at or bind to collaboration targets. This amendment further provided that Biogen licenses to the Company rights to use these Biogen target binding moieties and any related intellectual property as needed in order to conduct the research and development activities contemplated under the Biogen Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Biogen Agreement, the Company and Biogen agreed to collaborate on research activities to develop novel treatments for neurological conditions such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease through medicines that rely on TPD as their mode of action, all of which are created using the Company’s degrader technology. Under the terms of the Biogen Agreement, the Company was engaged to develop TPD therapeutics that utilize degrader technology for up tofive target proteins over a period of 54 months, ending in June 2023. On a target-by-target basis, after successful completion of a defined target evaluation period, Biogen assumes full rights and responsibility for continued development of each target. As of June 30, 2024, the research term of the Biogen Agreement has been fully satisfied.

In exchange for the non-exclusive research license from Biogen, as well as a $45.0 million nonrefundable upfront payment, the Company has granted Biogen a license to develop, commercialize, and manufacture products related to each of the targets (which is contingent on the parties not terminating the agreement), performs initial research services for drug discovery, has provided a non-exclusive research and commercial license to its intellectual property, and participates on the joint steering committee, or the Biogen JSC. For any target, following the achievement of development candidate criteria and prior to any IND-enabling study, Biogen will bear all costs and expenses of and will have sole discretion and decision-making authority with respect to the performance of further activities with respect to any degrader under development under the Biogen Agreement and all products that incorporate that degrader. Biogen is also required to pay the Company up to $35.0 million per target in development milestones and $26.0 million per target in one-time sales-based payments for the first product to achieve certain levels of net sales. In addition, Biogen is required to pay the Company royalties on a licensed product-by-licensed product basis, on worldwide net product sales. All milestone and sales-based payments are made after the Company has met the defined criteria in the joint research plan for that target, at which time Biogen will have control of the products related to the targets for commercialization; the receipt of these payments is contingent on the further development of products directed to the targets to commercialization by Biogen, without any additional research and development efforts from the Company.

In September 2025, the Company earned a $2.0 million milestone from Biogen after Biogen advanced BIIB142, a development candidate for IRAK4 that the Company delivered to Biogen, into the clinic. In April and September 2024, the Company earned payments of $8.0 million each from Biogen after Biogen accepted delivery oftwo development candidates. The Company's performance obligation under the Biogen Agreement was fully satisfied as of March 31, 2024 and the transaction price has been fully allocated.

The Company has recognized the full amount as revenue during the year ended December 31, 2025.

Summary of revenue recognized from collaboration agreements

Revenue from collaboration agreements was as follows (in thousands):

Supplemental information related to the collaboration and license agreements consisted of the following in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2025 (in thousands):

Supplemental information related to the collaboration and license agreements consisted of the following in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2024 (in thousands):

Supplemental financial information related to the collaboration and license agreements are (in thousands):

As of December 31, 2025, the aggregate amount of the estimated transaction price allocated to performance obligations under the Merck KGaA Agreement, the Betta Agreements, and Roche Agreement that are partially unsatisfied was $135.1 million. The majority of the remaining transaction price to be recognized as revenue is based on the estimated manufactured clinical supply costs under the Betta Pharma collaboration. Due to scientific and technical uncertainties of the clinical trials, the Company cannot be certain that this amount will be recognized as revenue in future periods.

Note 9. Stockholders’ equity

At-The-Market Equity Program

In November 2021, the Company filed an automatically effective registration statement on Form S-3, or the Registration Statement, with the SEC that registers the offering, issuance and sale of an unspecified amount of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and/or units of any combination thereof. Simultaneously, the Company entered into a sales agreement with Cowen and Company, LLC (now known as TD Securities (USA) LLC), as sales agent, to provide for the issuance and sale by the Company of up to $200.0 million of common stock from time to time in “at-the-market” offerings under the Registration Statement and related prospectus filed with the Registration Statement, or the 2021 ATM Program. For the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company settled 4,132,122 shares for net proceeds of $24.4 million. As of December 31, 2024, a total of 15,318,264 shares of the Company's common stock were sold at an average price of $5.54 per share for proceeds, net of commissions and fees, of $82.3 million.

In October 2024, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-3, or the 2024 Registration Statement, with the SEC that became effective on November 13, 2024 and registered the offering, issuance and sale of an unspecified amount of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and/or units of any combination thereof. Simultaneously, the Company entered into a sales agreement with TD Securities (USA) LLC, as sales agent, to provide for the issuance and sale by the Company of up to $200.0 million of common stock from time to time in “at-the-market” offerings under the 2024 Registration Statement and related prospectus filed with the 2024 Registration Statement, or the 2024 ATM Program. For the year ended December 31, 2025, a total of 3,769,483 shares of the Company's common stock at an average purchase price of $2.55 had been sold through the 2024 ATM Program, resulting in net proceeds of $9.4 million. No sales were made in 2024 under the 2024 ATM Program. In October 2025, the Company terminated the sales agreement prospectus related to the 2024 ATM Program.

In November 2025, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-3, or the 2025 Registration Statement, with the SEC that became effective on December 10, 2025 and registered the offering, issuance and sale of up to $400 million of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and/or units or any combination thereof, together with a sales agreement prospectus for the offer and sale of up to $125.0 million of common stock from time to time in “at-the-market” offerings under the 2025 Registration Statement and related prospectus filed with the 2025 Registration Statement, or the 2025 ATM Program. No sales have been made under the 2025 ATM program for the year ended December 31, 2025.

Certificate of Amendment to Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation

In June 2025, the Company's stockholders approved, and the Company filed, an amendment to the Company's Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 150,000,000 to 300,000,000. The certificate of amendment, which was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, became effective on June 18, 2025.

Underwritten Offering

In October 2025, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement, or the Underwriting Agreement, with Jefferies LLC, TD Securities (USA) LLC and Evercore Group L.L.C., or collectively, the Underwriters, related to an underwritten offering, or the Offering, of (i)21,895,000 shares, or the Shares, of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, or the Common Stock; (ii) in lieu of Common Stock to certain investors, pre-funded warrants to purchase an aggregate of 28,713,500 shares of Common Stock, or the Pre-Funded Warrants; (iii) accompanying Class A warrants to purchase an aggregate of 50,608,500 shares of Common Stock (or pre-funded warrants in lieu thereof), or the Class A Warrants, and together with the Class B Warrants (as defined below), the Class A and Class B Warrants; and (iv) accompanying Class B warrants to purchase an aggregate of 50,608,500 shares of Common Stock (or pre-funded warrants in lieu thereof), or the Class B Warrants, and together with the Pre-Funded Warrants and the Class A Warrants, the Warrants. Each Share was offered and sold together with accompanying Class A and Class B Warrants each exercisable forone share of Common Stock at a combined offering price of $2.47 per Share and accompanying Class A and Class B Warrants, and each Pre-Funded Warrant was offered and sold together with accompanying Class A and Class B Warrants at a combined offering price of $2.4699 per Pre-Funded Warrant and accompanying Class A and Class B Warrants. The Company received net proceeds from the Offering, after deducting the underwriting discount and commissions and estimated offering expenses, of approximately $116.9 million. If all Warrants are exercised, the aggregate net proceeds to the Company from the Offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses, are expected to be $341.7 million. See Note 10 for details on the Warrants.

Note 10. Warrants

In connection with the 2025 Offering, the Company issued 28,713,500 Pre-Funded Warrants, which have an initial exercise price per share of $0.0001, subject to certain adjustments. Each Pre-Funded Warrant can be exercised forone share of common stock. The Pre-Funded Warrants may be exercised at any time after the date of issuance by cash or cashless exercise, at the holder’s election, until all of the Pre-Funded Warrants are exercised in full, subject to the Beneficial Ownership Limitation. The Pre-Funded Warrants do not expire.

In connection with the 2025 Offering, the Company issued 50,608,500 Class A Warrants that can be exercised either forone share of common stock at an initial exercise price per share of $2.22 or forone pre-funded warrant for an exercise price of $2.2199, subject to certain adjustments. Each Class A Warrant is exercisable immediately and will expire on the earlier of (i) 30 calendar days following the public release of nine-month median follow-up data from any expansion cohort in the Company’s planned Phase 1b study of cemsidomide with elranatamab and (ii) the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance.

In connection with the 2025 Offering, the Company issued 50,608,500 Class B Warrants that can be exercised either forone share of common stock at an initial exercise price per share of $2.22 or forone pre-funded warrant for an exercise price of $2.2199, subject to certain adjustments. Each Class B Warrant is exercisable immediately and expire on the fifth anniversary of the date of issuance; provided that the Company may require the mandatory exercise of the Class B Warrants on or after thesix-month anniversary of the date of issuance and so long as the per share closing price of the Common Stock on The Nasdaq Global Select Market on each of theten consecutive trading days prior to the date of the Company’s notice of mandatory exercise is above $6.66, subject to certain adjustments.

The Class A and Class B Warrants are exercisable solely by means of a cash exercise; provided that, if, at the time a holder exercises its Class A Warrants, there is no effective registration statement registering, with a current prospectus available for, the issuance of the shares of Common Stock underlying such Class A or Class B Warrant or prior consent has been provided by the Company, then a holder may, elect to exercise such warrant through cashless exercise pursuant to the terms of the applicable warrant agreement. If the Company consents to a cashless exercise for a holder of Class A or Class B Warrants, a similar allowance for cashless exercise shall be provided to all holders of the same class of warrants.

All Warrants are outstanding as of December 31, 2025 and are classified as equity.

Note 11. Stock-based compensation

2015 Incentive Stock Option and Grant Plan

On December 28, 2015, the Company’s board of directors adopted the 2015 Incentive Stock Option and Grant Plan, or the 2015 Plan, and reserved 2,525,327 shares of common stock for issuance under this plan.

The 2015 Plan authorized the board of directors or a committee of the board to grant incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options and restricted stock awards to eligible employees, outside directors and consultants of the Company. Options granted under the 2015 Plan generally vest over a period offive oreight years with a cliff vesting atone year and quarterly vesting thereafter and options that lapse or are forfeited are available to be granted again. The contractual life of all options granted under the 2015 Plan isten years from the date of grant.

2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan

On September 8, 2020, the Company’s board of directors adopted the C4 Therapeutics, Inc. 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, or the 2020 Plan, which became effective on September 30, 2020. Upon adoption there were 6,567,144 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the 2020 Plan. The Company’s Board of Directors, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, and, in certain contexts, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company are authorized to grant a broad range of stock-based awards under the 2020 Plan, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, or SARs, restricted stock awards, or RSAs, restricted stock units, or RSUs, performance awards and stock bonus awards to the Company’s officers, employees, directors and other key persons, including consultants.

Following the effectiveness of the 2020 Plan, the Company ceased making grants under the 2015 Plan. However, the 2015 Plan continues to govern the terms and conditions of the outstanding awards granted under it. Shares of common stock subject to awards granted under the 2015 Plan that cease to be subject to such awards by forfeiture or otherwise after the termination of the 2015 Plan will be available for issuance under the 2020 Plan. As of December 31, 2025, there were 3,845,524 shares available for future grant under the 2020 Plan.

The 2020 Plan provides for an annual increase, to be added on the first day of each fiscal year, beginning with January 1, 2021 and continuing until the expiration of the 2020 Plan, equal to the lesser of (i)5% of the outstanding shares of common stock on the immediately preceding December 31st, or (ii) lesser number of shares determined by the administrator of the 2020 Plan, which is the Company’s Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. On January 1, 2026, the annual increase for the 2020 Plan resulted in an additional 4,845,720 shares authorized for issuance being added to the 2020 Plan.

On March 7, 2024, the Company approved an option repricing program applicable to outstanding option awards granted to current employees of the Company under the 2020 Plan with an exercise price per share greater than or equal to $22.00. The repriced awards have new exercise prices of $11.88 per share for awards held by employees generally and $19.00 per share for awards held by members of the Company's senior leadership team. To receive the benefit of this reduced exercise price, holders of repriced option awards must not, prior to March 7, 2025, (i) voluntarily leave employment with the Company or (ii) exercise the repriced options. The repriced options otherwise remain on their existing terms and conditions as set forth in the 2020 Plan and applicable award agreements. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company recorded an incremental non-cash charge of $0.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, related to this option repricing. On October 7, 2024, the 2020 Plan was amended to prohibit the plan's administrator from reducing the exercise price of outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights or effecting repricing through cancellation and re-grant or cancellation in exchange for cash or other awards without prior stockholder approval.

Stock-based compensation expense was as follows (in thousands):

The following table summarizes the stock option activity under the Company’s equity awards plans for the year ended December 31, 2025:

Other information related to the option activity of the Company was as follows:

As of December 31, 2025, the unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding options was $14.0 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.

The following table summarizes assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options granted to employees:

Performance-based restricted stock units

In January and February 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an issuance of 563,500 performance-based restricted stock units, or PSUs, to certain employees, including members of the Company’s leadership team under the 2020 Plan. Vesting of the PSUs are contingent upon the determination of achievement of certain discovery and clinical milestones, or as specified market conditions are met. Upon vesting, each PSU converts automatically intoone share of the Company’s common stock.

The following table summarizes the activity under the Company’s equity plans with respect to PSUs for the year ended December 31, 2025:

As of December 31, 2025, the remaining 98,000 unvested PSUs had been forfeited, as the term of the performance-based vesting period expired on February 28, 2025.

Time-based restricted stock units

The Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of time-based restricted stock units, or RSUs, to employees under the 2020 Plan. Vesting of the RSUs are contingent to time-based vesting conditions. These RSUs are valued on the grant date using the grant date market price of the underlying shares. Upon vesting, each RSU automatically converts into one share of the Company’s common stock.

The following table summarizes the activity under the Company’s equity plans with respect to RSUs for the year ended December 31, 2025:

As of December 31, 2025, the unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding RSUs was $9.1 million which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.7 years.

Inducement grants

On three separate dates in April, September, and October 2024, the Company's Board of Directors approved the grant of non-qualified stock options to purchase shares of the Company's common stock tothree new employees. Options granted under these inducement grants vest over a period offour years with 25% of the award vesting on the first anniversary of the vesting start date and the balance vesting in equal quarterly installments thereafter.

Other information related to the option activity of the Company was as follows:

As of December 31, 2025, the unrecognized compensation cost related to outstanding options was $2.0 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.4 years.

The following table summarizes assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options granted to employees in the year ended December 31 2024:

2020 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In September 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the C4 Therapeutics, Inc. 2020 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or the 2020 ESPP. Eligible employees may authorize payroll deductions of up to 15% of their eligible compensation during an offering period. The Company may holdone or more offering periods each year during which employees will be able to purchase shares under the 2020 ESPP. The Company issued 170,703 shares during the year ended December 31, 2025.

As of December 31, 2025, the Company had 2,652,916 shares available for future issuance under the 2020 ESPP. The 2020 ESPP provides for an annual increase to be added on the first day of each fiscal year, beginning with January 1, 2021 and continuing thereafter through January 1, 2030, equal to the lesser of (i)1% of the outstanding shares of common stock on the immediately preceding December 31st, (ii)656,714 shares, or (iii) lesser number of shares determined by the administrator of the 2020 ESPP. On January 1, 2026, the annual increase for the 2020 ESPP resulted in an additional 656,714 shares authorized for issuance being added to the 2020 ESPP.

Note 12. Income taxes

Income tax (benefit) expense consists of the following (in thousands):

The amounts of income taxes paid (net of refunds received) disaggregated by federal, states and foreign were as follows for the tax years ended (in thousands):

Tax rate reconciliation

A reconciliation of the expected income tax (benefit) expense computed at the statutory federal rate to income taxes as reflected in the consolidated financial statements was as follows:

1 State taxes in Massachusetts made up the majority (greater than 50%) of the tax effect in this category.

The Company's effective tax rate as of December 31, 2025, was primarily driven by income taxes related to the C4T Securities Corporation, a Massachusetts security corporation. This resulted in a tax provision of $0.1 million and effective tax rate of (0.1)%.

As previously disclosed for the tax year ended December 31, 2024, prior to the adoption of ASU 2023-09, the effective income tax rate differs from the statutory federal income tax rate as follows:

Significant components of deferred taxes

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of (a) temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes and (b) operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities were as follows (in thousands):

The Company has evaluated the positive and negative evidence bearing upon the realizability of the deferred tax assets. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, based on the Company’s historical operating losses, the Company has concluded that it is more-likely-than-not that the benefit of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. Accordingly, the Company has provided a full valuation allowance for the deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2025 and 2024. The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 was $203.6 million and $173.5 million, respectively. The net valuation allowance increased $30.0 million and $28.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The change during the year ended December 31, 2025 was primarily due to the increase in net operating loss, or NOL, and tax credits carryforward, and a decrease in capitalization of research and experimental expenditures.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had $359.6 million and $222.8 million gross United States federal NOL carryforwards, respectively, which may be available to offset future taxable income. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or TCJA, which was enacted in December 2017, will generally allow federal losses generated after 2017 to be carried over indefinitely, but will generally limit the NOL deduction to the lesser of the NOL carryover or 80% of a corporation’s taxable income (subject to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or IRC). In addition, there will be no carryback for losses generated after 2017. Losses generated prior to 2018 will generally be deductible to the extent of the lesser of a corporation’s NOL carryover or 100% of a corporation’s taxable income and be available for twenty years from the period the loss was generated. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Company has federal NOLs generated after 2017 of $359.6 million, which do not expire. The Company does not have any available NOLs generated prior to 2019 as they were fully utilized in 2019. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act, temporarily allows the Company to carryback NOLs arising in 2018, 2019 and 2020 to the five prior tax years. In addition, NOLs generated in these years could fully offset prior year taxable income without the 80% of the taxable income limitation under the TCJA.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company has total gross United States state NOL carryforwards of $474.9 million and $338.3 million, respectively, which may be available to offset future taxable income that expire at various dates through 2045.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company has United States federal research credit carryforwards of $18.8 million and $15.8 million, respectively, which are available to offset future federal income tax liabilities, which expire at various dates through 2045. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company has United States state credit carryforwards of $9.2 million and $7.8 million, respectively, which are available to reduce future tax liabilities which expire at various dates through 2040.

NOL and tax credit carryforwards may become subject to an annual limitation in the event of certain cumulative changes in the ownership interest of significant stockholders over a three-year period in excess of 50%, as defined under Sections 382 and 383 of the IRC, respectively, as well as similar state provisions. This could limit the amount of tax attributes that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income or tax liabilities. The amount of the annual limitation is determined based on the value of the Company immediately prior to the ownership change. Subsequent ownership changes may further affect the limitation in future years. In 2022, the Company completed a study of ownership changes from inception through December 31, 2020, to assess whether an ownership change has occurred or whether there have been multiple ownership changes since its formation. The result of this study indicated that the Company experienced ownership changes as defined by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, however there areno NOL carryforwards that will be limited and expire unused as a result of such ownership changes. Given the continued loss position, the Company has not currently undertaken an analysis for IRC Section 382 purposes of any activities post December 31, 2020. A full valuation allowance has been provided against the Deferred Tax Assets related to the Company’s NOL and tax credit carryforwards and, if an adjustment is required, this adjustment would be offset by an adjustment to the valuation allowance.

The Company will recognize interest and/or penalties related to unrecorded tax benefits in income tax expense as they arise. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company hadno accrued interest or penalties related to unrecorded tax benefits.

The Company files income tax returns as prescribed by the tax laws of the jurisdictions in which it operates. The federal and state income tax returns are generally subject to tax examinations for the tax years ended December 31, 2022 through present. To the extent that the Company has tax attribute carryforwards, the tax years in which the attributes were generated may still be adjusted upon examination by the Internal Revenue Services or State tax authorities to the extent utilized in a future period. The Company is not currently under examination by any tax authorities.

Note 13. Net loss per share

As described in Note 2, Summary of significant accounting policies, for periods in which the Company reports a net loss, potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as their effects would be anti-dilutive. Therefore, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate both basic and diluted net loss per share is the same. The Company excluded the following potential common shares presented based on amounts outstanding at period end, from the computation of diluted net loss per share for the periods indicated because including them would have had an anti-dilutive effect:

Holders of the Company's Class A and Class B Warrants participate in dividends on an as-converted basis when declared on common stock. As a result, both Class A and Class B Warrants meet the definition of a participating security, which requires the application of the two-class method to compute both basic and diluted net income per share. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that treats participating securities as having rights to earnings that would otherwise have been available to common stockholders. In addition, as the Class A and Class B Warrants are participating securities, it is required to calculate diluted net income per share under the if-converted method in addition to the two-class method and utilize the most dilutive result. In periods where there is a net loss, no allocation of undistributed net loss to stockholders is performed as the holders of our Class A and Class B Warrants are not contractually obligated to participate in the Company's losses.

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period. Potential common shares that are issuable for little or no cash consideration, such as the Company’s Pre-Funded Warrants issued with a de minimis exercise price of $0.0001 per share, respectively, are considered outstanding common shares which are included in the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share in all circumstances. Diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted average number of Common Stock and, if dilutive, potential Common Stock outstanding during the period. Potential Common Stock consists of the incremental Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants (in thousands, except share and per share data):

Note 14. Defined contribution plan

The Company has a 401(k) retirement plan, the 401(k) Plan, whereby all employees may contribute up to 90% of their eligible compensation, up to the maximum allowable amount set by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company matches 100% of contributions to the 401(k) Plan up to 3%, and matches an additional 50% of contributions up to 5%, for a total potential match of 4% for each employee. During each of the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company contributed approximately $1.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively, to the 401(k) Plan.

Note 15. Commitments and contingencies

Legal proceedings

The Company is not currently party to any material legal proceedings. At each reporting date, the Company evaluates whether or not a potential loss amount or a potential range of loss is probable and reasonably estimable under the provisions of the authoritative guidance that addresses accounting for contingencies. The Company expenses as incurred the costs related to such legal proceedings.

Note 16. Restructuring

On January 9, 2024, the Company implemented a plan to reduce operating costs and better align its workforce with the needs of its business. Under the cost reduction plan, the Company reduced its workforce by approximately 30%. The Company incurred one-time restructuring charges of $2.4 million, including employee severance, benefits and related termination costs. The termination costs were fully paid by December 31, 2024.

Note 17. Segment Reporting

The Company operates asone operating segment. The Company's chief operating decision maker, or CODM, is its chief executive officer, who reviews financial information presented on a consolidated basis. The CODM manages and allocates resources to the operations of the Company on a total company basis by assessing the overall level of resources available and how to best deploy these resources across functions and research and development projects that are in line with our long-term company-wide strategic goals. Consistent with this decision-making process, the CODM uses operating expenses to monitor budget versus actual results for purposes of evaluating performance and to make decisions about the allocation of resources. The CODM does not utilize revenue in their decision-making process as a significant amount of the revenues recognized by the Company are derived from the upfront payments received from our collaboration partners (see Footnote 8 for further details).

The financial metrics used by the CODM to make key operating decisions consist of development, research, and general and administrative expenses.

The following table presents selected financial information with respect to the Company’s single operating segment for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.

(1)The reconciling items include revenue, stock-based compensation expense, and impairment of long-lived assets expense for the year ended December 31, 2025. The reconciling items include revenue, stock-based compensation expense, and restructuring expense for the year ended December 31, 2024.