ONITY GROUP INC.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Feb 17, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Feb 17, 2026
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Servicing
This segment is primarily comprised of our mortgage servicing and subservicing business. We earn servicing and subservicing fees, including ancillary income, and incur cost to service the loans which varies depending on delinquency status. We are exposed to MSR valuation adjustments and advancing obligations when we own the MSR. Our servicing portfolio includes conventional, government-insured and non-Agency mortgage loans, small-balance commercial and multi-family loans, and reverse mortgage loans reported on our balance sheet. As of December 31, 2025, we serviced 1.4 million mortgage loans with an aggregate UPB of $328.3 billion.
In addition, the Servicing segment includes our wholly-owned captive reinsurance business (referred to as CRL), which provides re-insurance related to direct physical loss coverage on foreclosed real estate properties owned or serviced by us. CRL generally assumes a 90% (60% through January 2024) quota share of insurance coverage written by a third-party insurer issued to PHH.
Concentration
We strive to diversify our revenue sources by maintaining a balanced portfolio of owned servicing and subservicing, and by extending our subservicing client base. The below graph displays the distribution of our serviced loans by relationship at December 31, 2025 (percentage of total loan count). We also measure and monitor concentration risk of our subservicing clients by their relative profitability contribution.
Rithm is our largest subservicing client. On October 31, 2025, we were notified by Rithm of its intent to not renew its subservicing agreements effective January 31, 2026 with servicing transfers expected to begin in the first half of 2026. Upon transfer, we expect to downsize certain aspects of our servicing business as well as the related corporate support functions.
Servicing and subservicing fees from Rithm amounted to $78.5 million, or 12% of total servicing and subservicing fees (excluding ancillary income) in 2025 and the related remittances to Rithm presented as Pledged MSR liability expense amounted to $36.8 million. Rithm accounted for $32.2 billion or 10% and 19% of the total serviced UPB and loan count, respectively, of our servicing and subservicing portfolio as of December 31, 2025, and 50% of all delinquent loans that Onity serviced, for which the cost to service and the associated risks are higher.
MAV is our second largest subservicing client. As of December 31, 2025, PHH subserviced a total $38.3 billion UPB on behalf of MAV. PHH recognized servicing and subservicing fees of $58.6 million and the related remittances to MAV presented as Pledged MSR liability expense of $44.8 million in 2025. MAV is a GSE MSR investment vehicle formed by Onity subsequently sold to Oaktree (85% sold in 2021, the remaining 15% in 2024). Through November 2029, PHH has the right to be the exclusive subservicer of MAV of all MSRs that MAV owned upon MAV sale in 2024, for all future MSRs that MAV acquires from PHH, and for the majority of MAV’s MSR portfolio overall. In addition, the parties agreed to lockout restrictions where MAV is restricted to sell or otherwise transfer MSRs owned by MAV at the MAV sale date in 25% increments through September 30, 2027. MAV may freely sell or transfer any MSRs thereafter.
Loan Resolutions
We are a leader in the servicing industry that is focused on creating positive outcomes for homeowners, clients and investors. Reducing delinquencies enables us to recover advances and recognize additional ancillary income such as late fees, which we do not recognize on delinquent loans until they are brought current. Loan resolution activities address the pipeline of delinquent loans and generally lead to (i) modification of the loan terms, (ii) repayment plan alternatives, (iii) a discounted payoff of the loan (e.g., a “short sale”), or (iv) foreclosure or deed-in-lieu-of-foreclosure and sale of the resulting REO. To select an appropriate loan modification option for a borrower in accordance with the applicable servicing agreement, we perform a structured analysis, using a proprietary model, of all options using information provided by the borrower as well as external data, including recent broker price opinions to value the mortgaged property. Our proprietary model includes, among other things, an assessment of re-default risk.
Advance Obligation
As a servicer, we are generally obligated to advance funds in the event borrowers are delinquent on their monthly mortgage related payments. We advance principal and interest (P&I Advances), taxes and insurance (T&I Advances) and legal fees, property valuation fees, property inspection fees, maintenance costs and preservation costs on properties that have been foreclosed (Corporate Advances). For certain loans in non-Agency securitization trusts, we have the ability to cease making P&I advances and immediately recover advances previously made from the general collections of the respective trust if we determine that our P&I advances cannot be recovered from the projected future cash flows. With T&I and Corporate advances, we continue to advance if net future cash flows exceed projected future advances without regard to advances already made.
Most of our advances have the highest reimbursement priority (i.e., they are “top of the waterfall”), so we are entitled to repayment from respective loan or REO liquidation proceeds before any interest or principal is paid on the bonds that were issued by the trust. In the majority of cases, advances in excess of respective loan or REO liquidation proceeds may be recovered from pool-level proceeds. The costs incurred in meeting these obligations consist principally of the interest expense incurred in financing the servicing advances. Most subservicing agreements, including our agreements with Rithm and MAV, provide for prompt reimbursement of any advances from the owner of the servicing rights.
MSR Valuation Adjustments
The financial performance of our Servicing segment is impacted by the changes in fair value of the MSR portfolio due to changes in market interest rates, among other factors. Our MSR hedging policy is designed to reduce the expected volatility of the MSR portfolio fair value due to market interest rates commensurate with the target hedge coverage ratio determined by our Market Risk Committee. Refer to Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk for further detail on our hedging strategy.
Significant Variables
The following factors could significantly impact the results of our Servicing segment from period to period.
Aggregate UPB and Loan Count. Servicing fees are generally earned as a percentage of UPB and subservicing fees are earned on a per-loan basis or as a percentage of UPB. As a result, the change in aggregate UPB and loan count for which we have servicing rights or subservice will directly impact our revenue contributed by our Servicing segment. Aggregate UPB and loan count decline over time as a result of portfolio runoff or sales and increase to the extent we retain or add MSRs from new originations or engage in MSR acquisitions.
Cost to Service and Operating Efficiency. The financial performance of our Servicing segment is heavily dependent on our ability to scale our operations to cost-effectively and efficiently perform servicing activities in accordance with our servicing agreements.
Delinquencies. Delinquencies impact our financial results and operating cash flows for our Servicing segment. Non-performing loans are more expensive to service because the loss mitigation activities that we must undertake to keep borrowers in their homes or to foreclose, if necessary, are costlier than the activities required to service a performing loan. These loss mitigation activities include increased contact with the borrower for collection and the development of forbearance plans or loan modifications by highly skilled associates who command higher compensation as well as the higher compliance costs associated with these, and similar activities. In addition, when borrowers are delinquent, the amount of funds that we are required to advance to the investors increases. We utilize servicing advance financing facilities (match funded liabilities) to finance a portion of our advances. As a result, increased delinquencies result in increased interest expense.
Prepayment Speed. The rate at which portfolio UPB declines can have a significant impact on our Servicing segment. Items reducing UPB include scheduled and unscheduled principal payments (runoff), refinancing, loan modifications involving forgiveness of principal, voluntary property sales and involuntary property sales such as foreclosures. Prepayment speed impacts future servicing fees, runoff and valuation of MSRs, float earnings on float balances and interest expense on advances. Increases in anticipated lifetime prepayment speeds generally cause MSR valuation adjustments to increase because MSRs are valued based on total expected servicing income over the life of a portfolio. The converse is true when expectations for prepayment speeds decrease. Prepayments do not vary linearly with interest rates resulting in the convexity of the MSR, i.e., the interest rate sensitivity of the MSR changes when interest rates change. Specifically, as interest rates further increase, the lower the fair value of the MSR increases. While we economically mitigate the short-term prepayment risk of our MSR portfolio through recapture (see our Consumer Direct channel discussion), we remain exposed to MSR fair value volatility due to prepayments. Our MSR hedging strategy is designed to mitigate the impact of such interest rate fluctuations on lifetime projected prepayment activity, among other variables, and MSR asset value.
Interest rates. In addition to the impact of interest rate changes on prepayment speeds, the fair value of the MSR and associated hedging activities, float earnings on float balances, and the funding cost of servicing advances and MSR financing facilities are directly impacted by interest rate changes.
Reverse Mortgages
Our reverse business activities include both the subservicing of reverse mortgage loans on behalf of investors and the servicing of our owned portfolio. Owned portfolio loans are insured by the FHA, which provides protection against risk of borrower default, and are securitized through the Ginnie Mae program.
Our servicing activities of reverse loans are generally consistent with forward mortgage loan servicing as described above, with the following additional functions: the funding of borrower advances or draws under their approved borrowing capacity and the repurchase of loans upon reaching a limit:
a. Borrower draw funding obligation - Under the terms of ARM-based HECM loan agreements, the borrowers have additional borrowing capacity. Borrower draws or tails are funded by the servicer and are securitized. We do not incur any substantive underwriting, marketing or compensation costs in connection with any future draws, although we must maintain sufficient capital resources and available borrowing capacity to ensure that we are able to fund these future draws prior to securitization with Ginnie Mae (generally less than 30 days).
b. Loan repurchase obligation -As an HMBS issuer, we are required to purchase loans out of the Ginnie Mae securitization pools once they reach 98% of the maximum claim amount (MCA buyouts). Active buyouts are assigned to HUD and payment is received from HUD through a claims process, generally within 30 days. HUD reimburses us for the outstanding principal balance on the loan up to the maximum claim amount; we bear the risk of exposure if the outstanding balance on a loan exceeds the maximum claim amount. We may carry loans for some time in anticipation of payoff or favorable liquidation if we deem the investment accretive. Inactive buyouts (loans that are in default for one of the following reasons - title conveyances or the borrower is deceased, no longer occupies the property or is delinquent on tax and insurance payments) are generally liquidated through foreclosure and subsequent sale of REO. State specific foreclosure and REO liquidation timelines have a significant impact on the timing and amount of our recovery. If we are unable to sell the property securing the inactive reverse loan for an acceptable price within the timeframe established by HUD (typically six months from obtaining marketable title of the property), we are required to make an appraisal-based claim to HUD. In such cases, HUD reimburses us for the loan balance, eligible expenses and interest, less the appraised value of the underlying property. Thereafter, all the risks and costs associated with maintaining and liquidating the property remain with us; we may incur additional losses on REO properties as they progress through the liquidation processes related to delayed timelines due to market conditions, sales commissions, property preservation costs or property tax and insurance advances. The significance of future losses associated with appraisal-based claims is dependent upon the volume of inactive loans, condition of foreclosed properties and the general real estate market.
The Gain on reverse loans and HMBS-related borrowings, net reported within the Servicing segment includes the net fair value changes of securitized reverse mortgage loans and HMBS-related borrowings, that comprise the following:
contractual interest income earned on securitized reverse mortgage loans, or HECM loans, net of interest expense on HMBS-related borrowings, that is, on a net basis, the servicing fee we are contractually entitled to and collect on a monthly basis under the Ginnie Mae MBS Guide regarding servicing HMBS; and
other fair value changes of the net balance of securitized loans and HMBS-related borrowings, that effectively represents tails and servicing value. Tails are participations in previously securitized HECM loans and are created by additions to principal for borrower draws on lines-of-credit (scheduled and unscheduled), interest, servicing fees, and mortgage insurance premiums.
The fair value of our Ginnie Mae securitized HECM loan portfolio net of HMBS-related Borrowings generally decreases as market interest rates rise and increases as market rates fall. The interest rate exposure is managed as part of our MSR hedging strategy (see Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, Reverse loans held for sale pooled into HMBS and HMBS-related Borrowings and the associated interest rate sensitivity disclosure).
Gain (loss) on reverse loans and HMBS-related borrowings, net strictly reflects the financial performance of owned loans/servicing and excludes any subservicing activity. The financial performance associated with the subservicing of reverse mortgage loans on behalf of investors is primarily reflected within Servicing and subservicing fees, net.
Since 2023, we have opportunistically acquired reverse mortgage assets (reverse buyouts) from financial institutions and companies, specifically active and inactive reverse mortgage loans, HUD claim receivables, and real estate properties. We finance our asset acquisitions along with the buyouts of our own portfolio through on-balance sheet private placement securitizations (referred to as OLIT). The financial performance of such reverse asset management is reported within the Servicing segment, largely within Gains (losses) on loans held for sale, that are driven by multiple factors, including liquidation timeline and changes in market interest rates.
In November 2025, PHH agreed to sell its HECM loan portfolio and HMBS related borrowings to Finance of America Reverse LLC (“FAR”) and subservice the sold portfolio and additional loans from FAR. As of the filing date of this Form 10-K, the closing of the transaction remains contingent on Ginnie Mae's approval.
Operating Metrics
The following table provides selected operating statistics for our Servicing segment:
| % Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2025 vs 2024 | 2024 vs 2023 | |
| Unpaid principal balance (UPB) in billions: | |||||
| Performing loans (1) | $316.2 | $289.7 | $276.5 | 9% | 5% |
| Non-performing loans | 11.6 | 11.5 | 11.4 | 1 | 1 |
| Non-performing real estate | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | (1) | (10) |
| Total | $328.3 | $301.7 | $288.4 | 9 | 5 |
| Non-performing to total % | 3.7% | 4.0% | 4.1% | (7) | (4) |
| Conventional loans | $224.0 | $198.0 | $187.4 | 13% | 6% |
| Government-insured loans | 43.2 | 38.5 | 33.3 | 12 | 15 |
| Non-Agency loans | 61.1 | 65.1 | 67.6 | (6) | (4) |
| Total | $328.3 | $301.7 | $288.4 | 9 | 5 |
| Conventional loans to total % | 68.2% | 65.6% | 65.0% | 4 | 1 |
| Servicing portfolio - Owned MSR (2) | $164.8 | $142.7 | $131.4 | 15% | 9% |
| Servicing portfolio - Transferred MSR (3) | 38.6 | 40.5 | $46.9 | (5) | (14) |
| Subservicing portfolio | |||||
| Subservicing - forward (4) | 112.1 | 105.0 | 89.5 | 7 | 17 |
| Subservicing - commercial | 5.9 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 31 | 27 |
| Subservicing - reverse | 7.0 | 9.1 | 17.1 | (23) | (47) |
| Total subservicing | 125.0 | 118.5 | 110.1 | 5 | 8 |
| Total | $328.3 | $301.7 | $288.4 | 9 | 5 |
| Prepayment speed (CPR) | |||||
| Voluntary CPR | 6.1% | 5.0% | 4.1% | 23% | 22% |
| Involuntary CPR | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | (3) | (3) |
| Total CPR (6) | 9.6 | 8.5 | 7.6 | 13 | 12 |
| Number of completed modifications (in thousands) | 17.2 | 17.7 | 14.6 | (3)% | 21% |
| MSR weighted average note rate (5) | 4.6% | 4.2% | 3.9% | 8 | 9 |
| n/m: not meaningful | |||||
(1)Performing loans include those loans that are less than 90 days past due and those loans for which borrowers are making scheduled payments under loan modification, forbearance or bankruptcy plans. We consider all other loans to be non-performing.
(2)Includes HECM reverse mortgage loans with a UPB of $9.3 billion that are recognized in our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2025.
(3)Loans serviced pursuant to our sale or transfer agreements with MSR capital partners for which sale accounting is not achieved. Includes $8.3 billion with Rithm at December 31, 2025.
(4)Includes $23.9 billion UPB of subserviced loans on behalf of Rithm at December 31, 2025.
(5)Related to our owned MSR forward servicing portfolio.
(6)Total CPR includes voluntary and involuntary prepayments, as shown in the table, plus scheduled principal amortization.
The following table provides selected operating statistics related to our owned reverse mortgage loans held for sale pooled into HMBS, previously, held for investment reported within our Servicing segment:
| % Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2025 vs 2024 | 2024 vs 2023 | |
| Unpaid principal balance (UPB): | |||||
| Reverse Mortgage Loans (1) | $9,280.1 | $10,618.8 | $7,605.5 | (13)% | 40% |
| Active Buyouts (2) | 209.1 | 158.8 | 68.4 | 32 | 132 |
| Inactive Buyouts (2) | 846.3 | 525.3 | 198.1 | 61 | 165 |
| Total | $10,335.5 | $11,302.8 | $7,872.1 | (9) | 44 |
| Future draw commitments (UPB): | 2,896.6 | 3,077.7 | 1,782.0 | (6) | 73 |
| Fair value: | |||||
| Reverse Mortgage Loans (1) | $9,703.1 | $10,950.8 | $7,868.5 | (11) | 39 |
| HMBS related borrowings | 9,611.7 | 10,872.1 | 7,797.3 | (12) | 39 |
| Net asset value | $91.4 | $78.6 | $71.2 | 16 | 10 |
| Net asset value to UPB | 0.98% | 0.74% | 0.94% | ||
(1)Excludes unsecuritized loans reported within the Originations segment. Classified as loans held for sale, at fair value at December 31, 2025 and previously classified as loans held for investment. See Note 5 – Reverse Mortgages
(2)Buyouts are reported as Loans held for sale, Receivables or REO depending on loan and foreclosure status.
The following table provides a breakdown of our servicer advances, net of allowance for losses:
| Advances by investor type | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| December 31, 2025 | Principal and Interest | Taxes and Insurance | Foreclosures, bankruptcy, REO and other | Total |
| Conventional | $1.1 | $74.9 | $6.2 | $82.2 |
| Government-insured | 2.0 | 38.9 | 22.5 | 63.3 |
| Non-Agency | 95.6 | 165.1 | 77.3 | 337.9 |
| Total, net | $98.7 | $278.8 | $106.0 | $483.4 |
| December 31, 2024 | Principal and Interest | Taxes and Insurance | Foreclosures, bankruptcy, REO and other | Total |
| Conventional | $1.3 | $87.3 | $5.4 | $94.0 |
| Government-insured | 1.7 | 47.0 | 21.8 | 70.6 |
| Non-Agency | 146.8 | 179.8 | 86.0 | 412.6 |
| Total, net | $149.8 | $314.2 | $113.2 | $577.2 |
The following table provides the rollforward of activity of our portfolio of mortgage loans serviced that includes MSRs, whole loans and subserviced loans, both forward and reverse:
| Amount of UPB ($ in billions) | Count (000’s) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
| Portfolio at January 1 | $301.7 | $288.4 | $289.8 | 1,395.1 | 1,344.5 | 1,378.8 |
| Additions (1) (2) | 84.7 | 85.3 | 50.7 | 258.0 | 319.6 | 164.2 |
| MSR Sales (3) | (9.2) | (14.8) | — | (39.2) | (54.6) | (0.3) |
| Servicing transfers (1) (2) (3) | (14.6) | (25.3) | (23.3) | (64.0) | (91.1) | (80.1) |
| Runoff | (34.3) | (32.0) | (28.7) | (124.3) | (123.3) | (118.1) |
| Portfolio at December 31 | $328.3 | $301.7 | $288.4 | 1,425.7 | 1,395.1 | 1,344.5 |
(1)Includes the volume of UPB associated with short-term interim subservicing for some clients as a support to their originate-to-sell business, where loans may be boarded and deboarded within the same quarter.
(2)Includes MSRs acquired in 2025 with a UPB of $1.9 billion for which we were previously performing the subservicing.
(3)Includes MSRs sold in 2025 with a UPB of $9.2 billion for which we started performing subservicing.
Financial Performance
The following table presents selected results of operations of our Servicing segment. The amounts presented are before the elimination of balances and transactions with our other segments:
| Years Ended December 31, · % Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2025 vs 2024 | 2024 vs 2023 | |
| Revenue | |||||
| Servicing and subservicing fees | $857.2 | $830.5 | $945.2 | 3% | (12)% |
| Gain (loss) on loans held for sale, net | (4.1) | 1.4 | 10.3 | (397) | (87) |
| Gain (loss) on reverse loans and HMBS-related borrowings, net | 34.5 | 16.5 | 23.5 | 108 | (30) |
| Other revenue, net | 22.1 | 18.2 | 15.5 | 21 | 17 |
| Total revenue | 909.6 | 866.7 | 994.6 | 5 | (13) |
| MSR valuation adjustments, net | (189.4) | (109.7) | (243.9) | 73 | (55) |
| Operating expenses | |||||
| Compensation and benefits | 93.6 | 100.6 | 107.2 | (7) | (6) |
| Servicing expense | 47.6 | 42.8 | 53.5 | 11 | (20) |
| Occupancy, equipment and mailing | 28.8 | 27.3 | 28.1 | 5 | (3) |
| Professional services | 19.6 | 28.0 | 35.1 | (30) | (20) |
| Technology and communications | 30.3 | 24.7 | 24.6 | 23 | — |
| Corporate overhead allocations | 55.1 | 45.8 | 45.5 | 20 | 1 |
| Other expenses | 1.9 | 3.7 | 7.8 | (49) | (52) |
| Total operating expenses | 276.8 | 273.0 | 301.7 | 1 | (10) |
| Other income (expense) | |||||
| Interest income | 51.0 | 32.9 | 21.7 | 55 | 51 |
| Interest expense | (211.6) | (184.4) | (173.3) | 15 | 6 |
| Pledged MSR liability expense | (169.6) | (175.6) | (296.4) | (3) | (41) |
| Loss on debt redemption | — | (0.1) | — | (100) | n/m |
| Earnings of equity method investee | — | 22.9 | 7.3 | (100) | 214 |
| Other, net | 0.7 | (6.8) | 1.7 | (110) | (504) |
| Other income (expense), net | (329.5) | (311.2) | (439.0) | 6 | (29) |
| Income before income taxes | $113.9 | $172.8 | $9.9 | (34) | n/m |
| Income before income taxes to UPB (bps) | 4 | 6 | — | (37) | n/m |
| Average serviced UPB ($ billions) | $311.7 | $299.6 | $292.4 | 4 | 2 |
| Average headcount - Servicing | 2,870 | 3,133 | 3,414 | (8) | (8) |
Servicing and Subservicing Fees
The following chart displays servicing and subservicing fees by component for the years presented:
The following table and discussion present the drivers of servicing and subservicing fees.
| Years Ended December 31, · % Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2025 vs 2024 | 2024 vs 2023 | |
| Servicing fees | |||||
| Average servicing UPB (1) (6) | $183.1 | $167.4 | $203.0 | 9% | (18)% |
| Average servicing fee (2) | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.32 | (1)% | (7)% |
| Servicing fees (3) | $546.2 | $503.4 | $656.6 | 9% | (23)% |
| Subservicing fees (8) | |||||
| Average number of subserviced loans (4) (7) | 566.4 | 587.9 | 294.1 | (4)% | 100% |
| Average monthly fee per loan (5) | $15 | $16 | $23 | (11)% | (27)% |
| Subservicing fees (3) | $99.2 | $115.2 | $79.4 | (14)% | 45% |
(1) In $ billions, (2) In % of UPB, (3) In $ millions, (4) In thousands, (5) In dollars.
(6) Includes $34.9 billion average UPB of MSRs in 2023 previously sold to Rithm for which the sale accounting criteria were met effective December 31, 2023.
(7) Includes an average 209 thousand and 258 thousand loans subserviced under Rithm agreements in 2025 and 2024, respectively, of MSRs previously sold to Rithm for which the sale accounting criteria were met effective December 31, 2023.
(8) Includes reverse mortgage loan subservicing.
Servicing fees increased $42.8 million or 9% in 2025 primarily driven by to a 9% increase in average servicing UPB, with robust originations and recapture, and selective bulk MSR acquisitions as part of our replenishment and growth initiative.
Subservicing fees decreased $16.1 million or 14% in 2025 driven by three main factors. First, our Rithm subservicing fees decreased $15.1 million due to the lower pricing of the Rithm agreement (main driver of the lower average monthly fee in the table above), the deboarding of $5.7 billion UPB Rithm loans in the first quarter of 2025, and overall Rithm portfolio runoff. Second, reverse mortgage subservicing fees decreased $11.7 million mainly due to our acquisition of the reverse mortgage loans from MAM in November 2024 that we previously subserviced, and portfolio runoff. Third, and partly offsetting, subservicing fees increased $10.8 million due to our successful enterprise sale efforts to grow our residential and commercial subservicing portfolio by 19%, net of portfolio runoff.
The following table presents the composition of our ancillary income:
| Ancillary Income · Years Ended December 31, · % Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2025 vs 2024 | 2024 vs 2023 | |
| Custodial accounts (float earnings) | $134.0 | $129.3 | $110.7 | 4 | 17 |
| Late charges | 38.2 | 34.3 | 38.3 | 11% | (10)% |
| Reverse subservicing ancillary fees | 11.4 | 21.9 | 33.5 | (48) | (35) |
| Other | 28.3 | 26.4 | 26.7 | 7 | (1) |
| Ancillary income | $211.9 | $211.9 | $209.1 | —% | 1% |
Ancillary income for 2025 remained flat as compared to 2024, with some offsetting factors. Reverse subservicing ancillary fees decreased $10.5 million mostly driven by the acquisition of previously-subserviced client portfolio (from Waterfall) in the fourth quarter 2024 and by portfolio runoff. Float earnings increased $4.6 million or 4% due to higher average float balances driven by an increased servicing volume overall, partly offset by lower average short term interest rates (as a benchmark, the average 1-month term SOFR declined by 90 basis points). Late charges increased $3.8 million mainly driven by borrower payment behavior.
Gain (Loss) on Loans Held for Sale, Net
We recognized a $4.1 million loss on loans held for sale, net for 2025, as compared to the $1.4 million gain recognized in 2024. The $5.5 million decline is driven by losses on reverse mortgage buyouts in 2025, largely attributed to the reverse portfolio acquired from Waterfall in the fourth quarter of 2024.
Gain (Loss) on Reverse Loans and HMBS-Related Borrowings, Net
Gain (loss) on reverse loans and HMBS-related borrowings, net reported in the Servicing segment is the net change in fair value of securitized loans and HMBS-related borrowings. It excludes reverse subservicing that is reflected in Servicing and subservicing fees.
The following table presents the components of the net fair value change and is comprised of net interest income and other fair value gains or losses. Net interest income is primarily driven by the volume of securitized UPB as it is the interest income earned on the securitized loans offset against interest expense incurred on the HMBS-related borrowings, and represents a key component of our compensation for servicing the portfolio, which is generally a fixed percentage of the outstanding UPB. Other fair value changes are primarily driven by changes in market-based inputs or assumptions. Lower interest rates generally result in favorable net fair value impacts on our HECM reverse mortgage loans and the related HMBS financing liability and higher interest rates generally result in unfavorable net fair value impacts. The fair value changes of the net asset value between securitized HECM loans and HMBS (referred to as our reverse MSR) attributable to interest rate changes were effectively used as a hedge of our forward MSR portfolio through the third quarter of 2025. See further description of our hedging strategy and its effectiveness in Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
| Years Ended December 31, · % Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2025 vs 2024 | 2024 vs 2023 | |
| Net interest income (servicing fee) | $31.6 | $26.2 | 23.6 | 21 | 11% |
| Other change in fair value of securitized loans and HMBS-related borrowings, net | 1.2 | (9.7) | (0.1) | (112) | n/m |
| HECM hedging derivative gains (losses) | 1.6 | — | — | n/m | n/m |
| Gain (loss) on reverse loans and HMBS-related borrowings, net (Servicing) | $34.5 | $16.5 | $23.5 | 108% | (30)% |
Gain (loss) on reverse loans and HMBS-related borrowings, net for 2025 increased $17.9 million as compared to 2024, driven by the growth of the portfolio and a favorable decline in market interest rates and yield spread tightening, partly offset by certain unfavorable input and assumption updates. While not the only benchmark for the reverse mortgage exposure, the 10-year Treasury rate declined 40 basis points in 2025. As our HECM loan portfolio is predominantly comprised of ARMs, lower interest rates cause the loan balance to accrue and reach the 98% maximum claim amount liquidation at a slower pace, extending the life of the servicing net asset. Other change in fair value is partially hedged with our forward MSR hedge strategy through the third quarter of 2025. Net interest income, which effectively represents the servicing fee that we collect through monthly securitization, increased $5.4 million in 2025 as compared with 2024, mostly due to the acquisition of reverse mortgage loans from MAM in November 2024 that we previously subserviced.
Other Revenue, Net
Other revenue, net increased $3.8 million in 2025 as compared to 2024, mostly driven by the growth of our CRL captive reinsurance premium portfolio with an increase in covered properties.
Refer to the discussion above within Overview -Results of Operations and Financial Condition-MSR Valuation Adjustments, Net.
The following chart summarizes the impact of our MSR interest rate hedging strategy on Servicing segment results along with the impact of fair value changes due to other input and assumption updates (refer to the MSR Hedging Strategy section of Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks for further detail). As displayed below, our net income (total) is impacted by the combined effect of the fair value changes of the MSR portfolio attributable to input and assumption changes (including interest rates), the MSR hedging derivative gains and losses - both reported within MSR valuation adjustments, net on the face of the consolidated statement of operations - and other fair value changes of the HECM loans and HMBS-related borrowings (reverse exposure) used as a hedge for risk management purposes but separately presented on our consolidated statement of operations as Gain on reverse loans and HMBS-related borrowings, net through the third quarter of 2025. While our risk management hedging strategy is targeted towards changes in fair value due to interest rates, the below information portrays all fair value changes due to inputs and assumptions, including interest rates.
| ☐ | MSR fair value changes due to input and assumption changes - including interest rates (reported within the Servicing segment) |
|---|---|
| ☐ | MSR hedging derivative fair value changes |
| ☐ | Other change in fair value of securitized reverse mortgage loans and HMBS-related borrowings, net (through Q3 of 2025) |
With a high targeted hedge coverage ratio, the fair value volatility of the MSR portfolio due to changes in market interest rates, net of hedges (including the reverse exposure) was materially reduced for the years presented. The total impact of our MSR hedge strategy resulted in losses of $0.9 million in 2025 and gains of $37.2 million in 2024, largely driven by favorable input and assumption updates to reflect market transaction pricing levels.
Compensation and Benefits
Compensation and benefits expense for 2025 declined $7.1 million, or 7%, as compared to 2024 largely driven by an 8% headcount reduction resulting in a $5.9 million decrease in salaries and benefits. The decrease in average headcount is mainly attributed to the runoff of our reverse subservicing portfolio, lower average delinquencies and further efficiency gains within forward servicing.
Servicing Expense
Servicing expense primarily includes claim losses and interest curtailments on government-insured loans (provision for account receivables), provision expense for advances and servicing representation and warranties, other provision expense (including related to our captive reinsurance CRL), and certain loan-volume related expenses.
Servicing expense for 2025 was $4.7 million higher as compared to 2024 primarily attributed to $5.0 million higher CRL insurance loss expense due to higher property casualties, with other offsetting factors. We recognized an increase in provision for indemnification obligations mostly driven by recoveries and favorable resolutions in 2024, and an increase in satisfaction and interest on payoff expense attributable to higher payoff volume. These increases in servicing expense were partially offset by a reduction in 2025 in provision for advances and account receivables and debenture interest collection from HUD HECM claims.
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses (total operating expenses less Compensation and benefit expense and Servicing expense) for 2025 increased by $6.1 million as compared to 2024, with multiple offsetting factors. Corporate overhead allocations increased $9.3 million largely driven by higher Corporate services to support our growth initiatives. Technology and communications increased $5.6 million primarily driven by our technology initiatives (including robotic process automation, digitization and machine learning / artificial intelligence) and certain technology expenses previously reflected within Professional services. Professional services expense declined $8.4 million largely driven by certain litigation-related expenses recognized in 2024, with offsetting legal expenses and recoveries, and the reclassification of certain technology expenses now reflected within Technology and Communications.
Other income (expense) primarily includes net interest expense and pledged MSR liability expense.
| Years Ended December 31, · % Change | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2025 vs 2024 | 2024 vs 2023 | |
| Interest Expense | |||||
| MSR financing facilities | $85.8 | $72.4 | $70.6 | 19 | 3 |
| Advance match funded liabilities | 30.3 | 37.3 | 41.4 | (19)% | (10)% |
| Reverse mortgage securitization notes | 47.7 | 35.2 | 9.6 | 35 | 266 |
| Mortgage warehouse facilities | 12.7 | 5.6 | 12.3 | 124 | (54) |
| Corporate debt interest expense allocation | 27.2 | 26.5 | 30.2 | 3 | (12) |
| Escrow | 7.8 | 7.4 | 9.3 | 6 | (20) |
| Total interest expense | $211.6 | $184.4 | $173.3 | 15% | 6% |
| Average balances | |||||
| MSR financing facilities | $1,156.3 | $875.9 | $884.6 | 32 | (1) |
| Advance match funded liabilities | 327.0 | 391.1 | 427.7 | (16)% | (9)% |
| Reverse mortgage securitization notes | 560.3 | 337.8 | 93.9 | 66 | 260 |
| Mortgage warehouse facilities | 179.0 | 66.7 | 160.8 | 168 | (59) |
| Total asset-backed financing | $2,222.6 | $1,671.6 | $1,567.0 | 33% | 7% |
| Effective average interest rate | |||||
| MSR financing facilities | 7.42 | 8.26 | 7.98 | (10) | 4 |
| Advance match funded liabilities | 9.28% | 9.54% | 9.68% | (3)% | (1)% |
| Reverse mortgage securitization notes | 8.52 | 10.43 | 10.24 | (18) | 2 |
| Mortgage warehouse facilities | 7.08 | 8.46 | 7.63 | (16) | 11 |
| Average 1 month Term SOFR | 4.21% | 5.11% | 5.07% | (18)% | 1% |
Interest expense for 2025 increased by $27.2 million, or 15%, compared to 2024, driven by the growth of our assets, partly offset by lower financing cost due to lower interest rates. Interest expense on reverse mortgage securitization notes increased $12.5 million mainly due to the acquisitions and securitizations (OLIT) of reverse mortgage buyouts in 2025 and 2024, partly offset by lower cost of funds on the new securitizations. In addition, interest expense increased $7.0 million on warehouse facilities and $13.4 million on MSR facilities due to the growth of our portfolios, offset in part by lower average short-term market interest rates. These increases were partially offset by a $7.0 million decrease in interest expense on advance match funded facilities, mostly driven by the decline in average debt balances for servicing advances due to lower delinquencies and increased loan resolutions in our non-Agency MSR portfolio.
Interest income for 2025 increased $18.1 million, or 55%, compared to 2024 primarily due to the reverse mortgage buyouts acquired in 2025 and 2024.
Pledged MSR liability expense includes the servicing fee remittance related to the MSR sales or transfers that do not meet sale accounting criteria and are presented on a gross basis in our consolidated financial statements, including the servicing spread remittance associated with our ESS financing liability at fair value. See Note 8 — MSR Related Financing Liabilities, at Fair Value to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The following table provides the components of Pledged MSR liability expense:
| Years Ended December 31, | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
| Net servicing fee remittance for MSR transfers that do not meet sale accounting (1) | 117.5 | 123.8 | 244.9 |
| ESS servicing spread remittance | 52.1 | 51.8 | 51.5 |
| Pledged MSR liability expense | $169.6 | $175.6 | $296.4 |
(1)See Note 8 — MSR Related Financing Liabilities, at Fair Value to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The servicing fee and ancillary income collections on such transferred MSRs are recognized within Servicing and subservicing fees.
Pledged MSR liability expense for 2025 decreased $6.0 million as compared to 2024, mostly driven by MAV’s sale of MSRs in 2024 (previously sold by Onity to MAV in a transaction which did not qualify for sale accounting) which resulted in the derecognition of the Pledged MSR liability, partly offset by the lower subservicing fee pricing on Rithm agreement effective March 2025 (effectively increasing remittances).
Other, net is mostly driven by early payoff protection expense recognized in 2024 in connection with our MSR sale transactions.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.