Nutex Health, Inc.

The Company, its consolidated subsidiaries or VIEs may be named in various claims and legal actions in the normal course of business. Based upon counsel and management’s opinion, except for the items listed below, the outcome of such matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

On April 14, 2025, VLS Emergency Medicine, LLC, Astra Assets, LLC, Right on Hereford, LLC, and Nexus Group Two LLC (collectively, the “ABQ Plaintiffs”) filed an Original Petition against Nutex Health Holdco LLC (“Nutex Holdco”) and Thomas Vo, MD in the District Court of Harris County, Texas, Case No. 2025-26239. The ABQ Plaintiffs allege that the May 16, 2024 Amendment to the Contribution Agreement, dated November 23, 2021, was wrongfully executed by Nutex Holdco and Dr. Vo, in his capacity as the authorized “Owner Representative” (as defined in the Contribution Agreement). The Amendment clarifies that the Parent Stock Price Floor, as defined in the Contribution Agreement, is adjusted for the 2024 Reverse Stock Splits. The Parent Stock Price Floor is used in the determination of the number of shares to be issued to the ABQ Plaintiffs. Rejecting the reverse-stock-split adjustment, the ABQ Plaintiffs demand the issuance of a higher number of shares, which would force the Company to grant the ABQ Plaintiffs a higher percentage ownership in the Company, to the detriment of the Company’s other stockholders. Nutex Health disputes the allegation that the Amendment was wrongfully executed and intends to defend against the ABQ Plaintiffs’ demands. The Company cannot guarantee that the ABQ Plaintiffs will not prevail in their demands, which would have a materially adverse effect on the Company and its stockholders. Please see Item 1A. Risk Factors - Our obligation to issue additional shares of our common stock to former owners of under construction hospitals may cause additional dilution of our current stockholders.

Nutex Holdco and Dr. Vo have filed their answers and counterclaims, addressing the allegations set forth and presenting their own claims against the ABQ Plaintiffs. The parties are currently engaged in the initial stages of written discovery and document production. At this time, no depositions have been conducted, and no dispositive motions have been filed. A trial date for this case has not been set.

In addition, on May 30, 2025, JBS Fort Smith Hospital Investors, LP, Copper Oaks Emergency Physicians, LLC, KG4JB 5578, PLLC, Mark R. Rucker, PLLC, Premier Macy Management Holdings, LLC, Nicut EMS, LLC, and Tribbey Emergency Services,

LLC (collectively the “Former Ft. Smith Owners”) submitted a Notice of Claim and Draft Complaint (“Notice”) to Nutex Holdco. In the Notice, the Former Ft. Smith Owners demand that the pre-reverse split Parent Stock Price Floor shall be used in the calculation of the number of shares to be issued. The parties are currently engaged in settlement discussions. The Company is unable to predict the outcome of these discussions or determine whether any resolution of the demands made in the Notice will have a materially adverse effect on the Company and its stockholders.

Securities Action

On August 22, 2025, a putative securities class action complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (Anjana Bhagavan v. Nutex Health Inc., Case No. 4:25-cv-03999) on behalf of the plaintiff and all other persons (other than defendants) who purchased Nutex Health Inc.’s stock between August 8, 2024 and August 14, 2025. The complaint names Nutex Health Inc., its Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, its Chief Financial Officer and its President and Director as defendants and asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.

The plaintiff alleges that the defendants made material misstatements and omissions in the Company’s public filings relating to the alleged conduct of a third-party vendor who assisted the Company in pursuing claims against health plans under the independent dispute resolution process of the No Surprises Act. The plaintiff also alleges that the defendants made material misstatements and omissions related to the Company’s internal accounting controls. The plaintiff seeks unspecified damages, fees, and interest on behalf of himself and the putative class.

The Company has not yet responded to the complaint. The court has not yet issued a scheduling order or set the case for trial. No discovery has occurred. The Company is unable to predict the outcome of the litigation or estimate the potential financial impact, but an adverse ruling could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Derivative Actions

On September 8, 2025, a purported stockholder filed a derivative action on behalf of Nutex Health Inc. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, captioned Juan Camilo Jimenez, derivatively on behalf of Nutex Health Inc., Case No. 4:25-cv-04253, naming as defendants the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, its Chief Financial Officer and its President, along with the current members of its Board of Directors (other than Frank E. Jaumot) and a director who recently retired from the Board of Directors, alleging, among other things, violations of Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act, breaches of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and waste of corporate assets. In addition, on September 11, 2025, a second purported stockholder filed a derivative action on behalf of Nutex Health Inc. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, captioned Michael Minckler, derivatively on behalf of Nutex Health Inc., nominal defendant v. Thomas T. Vo, et al; Case no. 4:25-cv-4330 containing nearly identical allegations. The derivative actions arise from the same operative facts as alleged in the securities class action, and they seek orders permitting the plaintiff to maintain the action derivatively on behalf of the Company, awarding unspecified damages allegedly sustained by the Company, awarding restitution from the individual defendants and requiring the Company to make certain reforms to its corporate governance and internal procedures.

The Company has stipulated to the consolidation of the two derivative actions but has not yet responded to the complaints. The court has not yet issued a scheduling order or set either case for trial. No discovery has occurred. The Company is unable to predict the outcome of the litigation or estimate the potential financial impact, if any.