Advanced Flower Capital Inc.
For the period ended Sep 30, 2025. Filed Nov 12, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Sep 30, 2025 · Filed Nov 12, 2025
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we may become involved in litigation or other legal proceedings relating to claims arising from the ordinary course of business. Furthermore, third parties may try to seek to impose liability on us in connection with our loans.
On September 9, 2025, a complaint was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California in Los Angeles County naming, among others, the Company, the Manager, and certain of their officers and/or directors as defendants. On September 19, 2025, an amended complaint was filed in the same action that revised certain allegations, but did not assert new causes of action or add or remove plaintiffs or defendants. The amended complaint was filed by the parent company and two subsidiaries of Private Company G. The Company has filed separate legal actions in New York against the
Index
guarantors of the loan the Company made to the two subsidiaries (among other borrowers), and those two subsidiaries have filed an action against the Company (and others) in New Jersey. The complaint alleges that the Company conspired with a restructuring advisory firm to mismanage the borrowers’ operations and wrongfully seize their assets during a forbearance period that followed the borrowers’ material defaults under the credit facility. The complaint alleges claims for breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, intentional interference with contract, and unjust enrichment, and seeks substantial monetary damages. The Company, the Manager, and affiliated officers and/or directors (but not the restructuring advisory firm) are preparing a motion to quash the summonses on the grounds of lack of personal jurisdiction over them in California. The Company believes the claims are baseless and intends to vigorously defend this matter.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.