Skip to main content

DarkHorse Technologies Inc.

For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Mar 28, 2025.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2024 · Filed Mar 28, 2025

DRK$1.64-3.8%Stored close · as of Nov 10, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sphere 3D Corp. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Going Concern Matter

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and does not expect to have sufficient cash on hand to fund its operations that raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Bitcoin Mining Revenue

As disclosed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company accounts for revenue in accordance with Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The Company provides a service to perform hash calculations to third-party operated mining pools and in exchange for providing the service, the Company earns non-cash consideration in the form of bitcoin based on the Full-Pay-Per-Share (“FPPS”) payout method set forth by the mining pool operators. Bitcoin mining revenue is comprised of the block reward and transaction fees earned by the Company net of the mining pool fees charged by the mining pool operators. During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company recognized bitcoin mining revenue of approximately $16.6 million and $19.7 million, respectively.

We identified the auditing of mining revenue as a critical audit matter due to the nature and extent of audit effort required to perform audit procedures over the Company’s hash calculation service provided to the mining pool operators, the associated contractual payouts including the blockchain contractual inputs, the Company’s valuation of bitcoin received from the mining pool operators and evaluating the results of those procedures.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:

We independently confirmed with mining pool operators the significant contractual terms utilized in the determination of mining revenue, total mining rewards earned by the Company, and the Company’s digital asset wallet addresses in which the rewards are deposited.

Using the Company’s digital asset wallet addresses confirmed by the mining pool operators, we reconciled the mining revenue earned from and paid by the mining pool operators against on-chain transactions independently obtained from the blockchain.

We evaluated the reasonableness of the prices utilized by the Company to value bitcoin by obtaining independent bitcoin prices and comparing those to the prices used by the Company.

We recalculated the Company’s recorded mining revenue per the calculation prescribed in the FPPS payout method, based on the hash calculation service provided to the mining pool operators, using independently obtained blockchain contractual inputs and independent bitcoin prices.

We undertook an analytical review of total bitcoin mining revenue expected to be recognized by the Company by assessing the total hash rate contributed onto the network by the Company against total block rewards and transaction fees issued over the year.

For the mining revenue generated through colocation facilities, we developed an expectation for the hash rate provided to the mining pool operators and the mining revenue earned, and compared our expectation to the amount recorded by the Company.

/s/MaloneBailey, LLP

www.malonebailey.com

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2022.

Houston, Texas

March 28, 2025

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.