Ready Capital Corp

From time to time, the Company may be involved in various claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of business.

On June 6, 2024, a purported former stockholder of Broadmark filed a class action lawsuit, captioned Eibling v. Pyatt, et

al., Case No. C-24-CV-24-000818, in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland (the “Action”). The Action names

as defendants Broadmark’s former board of directors and alleges they breached their fiduciary duties in connection with

the Broadmark Merger by failing to properly consider acquisition proposals that were purportedly superior to the

Broadmark Merger, by relying on purportedly false and misleading valuation analyses, and by authorizing the issuance

of a purportedly false and misleading proxy statement. The Action also asserts claims against Broadmark’s financial

advisor for aiding and abetting these alleged breaches of fiduciary duty. The Action seeks damages in the form of

compensatory damages, quasi-appraisal damages, rescissory damages, and disgorgement of any merger-related benefits.

The Action also seeks reimbursement for litigation expenses and attorneys’ and experts’ fees. On September 13, 2024,

the Action was assigned to the Business and Technology Case Management Program of the Circuit Court for Baltimore

City, Maryland. Thereafter, on December 10, 2024, the defendants moved to dismiss the operative complaint. Although

the Company is not a defendant in the Action, it is subject to contractual indemnification obligations (conditioned on the

satisfaction of various contractual requirements) in connection therewith, including with respect to the defendants’

service as Broadmark directors and provision of services to Broadmark, as applicable. The defendants intend to

vigorously defend against the Action.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures