NEWMARK GROUP INC

Throughout this document Newmark Group, Inc., and where applicable, its consolidated subsidiaries, is referred to as “Newmark,” “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our.”

Our Business

Newmark is a leading commercial real estate advisor and service provider to large institutional investors, global corporations, and other owners and occupiers. We offer a diverse array of integrated services and products designed to meet the full needs of our clients.

Our investor/owner services and products include:

•capital markets consists of investment sales and commercial mortgage brokerage (which includes the placement of debt, equity raising, structured finance, and loan sales on behalf of third parties);

•landlord (or agency) representation leasing;

•valuation and advisory;

•property management and flexible workspace solutions for owners;

•our leading commercial real estate technology platform and capabilities;

•due diligence, consulting and other advisory services;

•GSEs and FHA lending, including multifamily lending and loan servicing;

•limited loan servicing and asset management; and

•business rates for U.K. property owners.

Our corporate or occupier services and products include:

•tenant representation leasing;

•GCS, which includes real estate, workplace and occupancy strategy, corporate consulting services, project management, lease administration and facilities management;

•flexible workspace solutions for occupiers; and

•business rates for U.K. occupiers.

Our goal is to lead with extraordinary talent, data, and analytics, which together allow us to provide strategic and specialized advice. This combination enables our revenue-generating employees, including brokers, originators, and other customer-facing professionals to be highly productive and to help clients increase their efficiency and profits while optimizing their real estate portfolios.

We have relationships with many of the world’s largest commercial property owners, real estate developers and investors, as well as Fortune 500 and Forbes Global 2000 companies. For the year ended December 31, 2024, we generated revenues of over $2.7 billion, primarily from commissions on leasing and capital markets transactions, consulting and technology user fees, property and facility management fees, and mortgage origination and loan servicing fees. Our revenues are widely diversified across service lines, geographic regions and clients, with our top 10 clients accounting for approximately 9.1% of our total revenue on a consolidated basis for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Newmark’s History

Newmark was founded in New York City in 1929, with an emphasis on local investor/owner and occupier services and products and became known for having dedicated, knowledgeable, and client-focused advisors/intermediaries. Our acquisition by Cantor’s subsidiary BGC in 2011 and its subsequent investments in our business contributed to Newmark’s strong growth. From that time until we spun off from BGC in November 2018, we embarked on a rapid expansion throughout North America encompassing nearly all key business lines in the commercial real estate services sector, which included the acquisition of Berkeley Point Financial LLC in 2017. We believe our long-term growth has been a result of our management team’s strong understanding of commercial real estate as an asset class, long-term vision and deep relationships with users and owners, our strong culture of innovation and collaboration, our ability to adapt to the evolving market and to shifts in the demand for our services, and our proven track record of attracting and retaining the industry’s best talent.

Between 2011 and 2024, we increased our total revenues by a CAGR of approximately 21%. Based on reported results, we believe that our improvement was greater than the average for our publicly traded commercial real estate services peers listed in the U.S. that have reported revenues over this period, as of March 3, 2025.

Due to this long-term record of growth, we are now a top commercial real estate services platform in the United States with a rapidly expanding international footprint.

Recent Board of Directors and Executive Officers Changes

On February 18, 2025, Mr. Howard W. Lutnick was confirmed by the United States Senate as the 41st Secretary of Commerce. Following his confirmation, on February 18, 2025, Mr. Howard W. Lutnick stepped down as Chairman of the Board and Executive Chairman of the Company. On February 18, 2025, the Company appointed Mr. Kyle Lutnick, son of Mr. Howard W. Lutnick, to serve as a member of the Board. Additionally, on February 18, 2025 the Company appointed Mr. Stephen M. Merkel to serve as a member of the Board and as Chairman of the Board. On February 18, 2025, the Company appointed its Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Barry M. Gosin, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company following Mr. Howard W. Lutnick’s departure. Mr. Howard W. Lutnick has agreed to divest his interests in Newmark to comply with U.S. government ethics rules, which is expected to occur within 90 days following his confirmation, and does not expect any arrangement which involves selling shares on the open market.

Our Services

Newmark offers a diverse array of integrated services designed to meet the full needs of both real estate investors/owners and occupiers. We believe our technological advantages, industry-leading talent, deep and diverse client relationships and suite of complementary services allow us to actively cross-sell our services and drive margins.

Real Estate Investor/Owner Services and Products

Capital Markets. We offer a broad range of capital markets services, including investment sales and mortgage brokerage (which together include debt and equity placement, fundraising, and recapitalization) of individual assets, portfolios and operating companies. We match capital providers with capital users. Our capital markets professionals have deep relationships with investors and capital sources of various composition, including government sponsored agencies, insurance companies, pension funds, real estate investment trusts, private funds, private investors, developers and construction firms.

Landlord (or “Agency”) Representation Leasing. We understand the nuanced needs of corporate, institutional, family and entrepreneurial property owners, and develop customized leasing strategies to help them attract and maintain the right tenants. Armed with both on-the-ground intelligence and comprehensive data, we help landlords find opportunities and make sound decisions. From strategic planning to property and asset management, we believe that our seamless services deliver increased revenue and enhanced value for our clients.

V&A. Our V&A professionals execute projects of nearly every size and type, from single properties to large portfolios, existing and proposed facilities, and mixed-use developments across the spectrum of asset classes. Clients include banks, pension funds, equity funds, REITs, insurance companies, developers, corporations, and institutional capital sources. These institutions utilize the advisory services we provide in their loan underwriting, construction financing, portfolio analytics, feasibility determination, acquisition structures, litigation support, property tax, and financial reporting.

Property Management and Flexible Workspace Solutions. We provide property management services on a contractual basis to owners and investors in office (including medical and life sciences offices), industrial and retail properties. Property management services include building operations and maintenance, vendor and contract negotiation, project oversight and value engineering, labor relations, property inspection/quality control, property accounting and financial reporting, cash flow analysis, financial modeling, lease administration, due diligence and exit strategies. We also offer amenity-rich and flexible work environments across a network of offices, located primarily in Europe and North America. These businesses also give us better insight into our clients’ overall real estate needs.

U.K. Business Rates Services. Business rates is a property tax payable on most commercial properties in the U.K. This tax is based on government valuations based on market rental value that are currently reassessed every three years. According to the Office for Budget Responsibility, U.K. businesses spend a total of approximately £30 billion annually in business rates liability. The owner and occupier of each property has a right to challenge the level of value assessed on their premises and, where applicable, can apply for relevant reliefs and exemptions. As part of our service suite, we manage rate payments, processing £1 billion in rates each year as one of the U.K.’s leading outsourced ratepayers. Our success in helping clients save on this tax is underpinned by the deep knowledge that our team has of property sectors, property cases, market movements, and complex legislative procedures. We are an established market leader in the U.K. with over 1,800 corporate clients. Since 2017, Gerald Eve (which now operates as Newmark), has handled £9.3 billion in Rateable Value and achieved £1.3 billion in client savings. We believe that this business provides valuable connectivity to many of our other service lines and generates a solid stream of recurring and predictable revenues.

Leading Commercial Real Estate Technology Platform and Capabilities. Investing in digital solutions has become imperative and we remain dedicated to creating customer-centric technology that optimizes our business methods while keeping our workforce and clients safe. Our multi-faceted real estate database continues to grow, as does our commitment to providing innovative, value-added technological solutions across our service lines, which enables our professionals to provide clients with data-driven advice and analytics with expediency. Our solutions are designed to increase operational efficiency, realize additional income, and/or generate cost savings for our professionals and clients.

Due Diligence, Consulting, Advisory Services and Other Services. We provide commercial real estate due diligence consulting and advisory services to a variety of clients, including lenders, investment banks and investors. Our core competencies include underwriting, modeling, structuring, due diligence, and asset management. We also offer clients cost-effective and flexible staffing solutions through both on-site and off-site teams. We believe this business line and other non-brokerage services we offer give us additional ways to cross-sell services and add value to our clients.

GSE/FHA Lending. We operate a leading commercial real estate finance company focused on the origination and sale of multifamily and other related commercial real estate loans through government-sponsored and government-funded loan programs, as well as the servicing of loans originated by it and third parties. We participate in loan origination, sale, and servicing programs operated by two GSEs, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. We also originate, sell and service loans under HUD FHA programs, and are an approved HUD MAP and HUD LEAN lender, as well as an approved Ginnie Mae issuer.

Through HUD’s MAP and LEAN Programs, we provide construction and permanent loans to developers and owners of multifamily housing, affordable housing, senior housing and healthcare facilities. We are one of 25 approved lenders that participate in the Fannie Mae DUS program and one of 23 lenders approved as a Freddie Mac seller/servicer. As a low-risk intermediary, we use our warehouse facilities, including $1.5 billion of committed loan funding, $1.1 billion of uncommitted loan funding available through three commercial banks, and an uncommitted $500.0 million Fannie Mae loan repurchase facility to originate loans guaranteed by government agencies or entities and pre-sell such loans prior to transaction closing. We have established a strong credit culture over decades of originating loans and remain committed to disciplined risk management from the initial underwriting stage through loan payoff.

Loan Servicing and Asset Management. In conjunction with our origination services, we sell the loans that we originate under GSE and FHA programs and retain the servicing of those loans. Our GSE/FHA loan servicing portfolio provides a stable, predictable recurring stream of revenue to us over the life of each loan. The typical multifamily loan that we originate and service under these programs is either fixed or variable rate and includes significant prepayment penalties. These structural features generally offer prepayment protection and provide more stable, recurring fees. In addition to our GSE/FHA portfolio, we also service loans for other lenders, as well as offer limited servicing, special servicing, and asset management for a wide range of commercial and multifamily loans.

Our servicing operations are rated by Fitch, S&P, and Kroll for commercial loan primary and special servicing and consist of a team of professionals dedicated to primary, limited, special servicing and asset management. These professionals focus on financial performance and risk management to anticipate potential property, borrower, or market issues. Portfolio management conducted by these professionals is not only a risk management tool, but also leads to deeper relationships with borrowers, resulting in continued interaction with borrowers over the term of the loan, and potential additional financing opportunities.

Real Estate Corporate or Occupier Services and Products

Tenant Representation Leasing. We represent commercial tenants in virtually all aspects of the leasing process (often in conjunction with GCS), including space acquisition and disposition, strategic planning, site selection, financial and market analysis, economic incentives analysis, lease negotiations, lease auditing and project management. We assist clients by defining space requirements, identifying suitable alternatives, recommending appropriate occupancy solutions, negotiating lease and ownership terms with landlords and minimizing real estate costs and associated risks for clients through analyzing, structuring and negotiating business and economic incentives, as well as advising on relevant sustainability and environmental issues. Fees are typically based on a percentage of the total financial consideration of the lease commitment for executed leases and are generally earned when a lease is signed. In many cases, landlords are responsible for paying the fees. We use innovative technology and data to provide tenants with an advantage in negotiating leases, which has contributed to our market share gains.

Global Corporate Services. GCS is our consulting and outsourcing services business that focuses on reducing occupancy expenses and improving efficiency for corporate real estate occupiers, with significant, often multi-national presences. We provide beginning-to-end corporate real estate solutions for clients. GCS strives to make its clients more effective by optimizing real estate usage, managing overall corporate footprint expenses, and improving workflow and human capital efficiency through large scale data analysis and our industry-leading technology.

We provide real estate strategic consulting services to our clients, including Fortune 500 and Forbes Global 2000 companies, owner-occupiers, and government agencies, as well as organizations in healthcare and higher education. We also provide enterprise asset management information consulting and technology solutions which can yield cost-savings for our client base. Our consulting services include financial integration, asset and portfolio strategy, location strategy and optimization, workplace strategies, energy and sustainability, workflow and business process improvement, merger and acquisition integration and industrial consulting. We also offer clients value added services including project management, real estate and lease administration and facilities management. Fees for these services are on a negotiated basis and are often part of a multi-year services agreement. Fees may be contingent on meeting certain financial or savings objectives with incentives for exceeding agreed upon targets.

We believe that GCS provides us with a unique lens into commercial real estate and offers ways to win business across multiple business lines. Whether a client currently manages its real estate function in-house (insource) or has engaged an external provider (outsource), GCS aims to create value by securing accounts that are first generation outsourced or by gaining outsourced market share. GCS often provides us with recurring and/or contractual revenue streams when it enters into multi-year contracts for ongoing services, such as project and facilities management and real estate and lease administration over the course of the contract.

For the past 16 years, the International Association of Outsourcing Professionals has named Newmark to The Global Outsourcing 100®, which identifies the world’s best outsourcing providers across all industries.

U.K. Business Rates Services and Flexible Workspace Solutions. See the above descriptions under“Real Estate Investor/Owner Services and Products.”

Business Partners

In certain smaller U.S. and international markets in which we do not maintain Newmark-owned offices, we have agreements in place to operate on a collaborative and cross-referral basis with certain independently owned offices in return for contractual and referral fees paid to us and/or certain mutually beneficial co-branding and other business arrangements. These independent offices are referred to as “business partners.” We believe these partnerships allow us to provide the best service to our clients and higher returns to our shareholders, without diluting our focus. These business partners may use some variation of our branding in their names and marketing materials. These agreements typically take the form of multi-year contracts, and provide for mutual referrals in their respective markets, generating additional contract and brokerage fees. While we do not derive a significant portion of our revenue from these relationships, they do enable us to seamlessly provide service to our mutual clients. These business partners give our clients access to additional brokerage professionals with local market research capabilities as well as other commercial real estate services in locations where the Company does not have a physical presence. The discussion of our financial results and other metrics reflects only the business owned by us and does not include the results for business partners using some variation of the Newmark name in their branding or marketing. See “Risks Related to Our Business—Risks Related to Our Commercial Contracts and Arrangements—We may not be able to replace partner offices when affiliation agreements are terminated, which may decrease our scope of services and geographic reach,” under Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors.

Industry Trends and Opportunity

We expect the following industry and macroeconomic trends to impact our market opportunity:

Large and Highly Fragmented Market. We estimate that the commercial real estate services industry is a more than $400 billion global revenue market opportunity. This TAM represents the actual and/or potential revenues that are or could be generated annually by public and private commercial real estate services firms. We believe that a significant portion of the TAM currently resides with smaller and regional companies offering services like ours. We also believe that a large percentage consists of real estate services that are performed in-house by owners and occupiers but that could be partially or entirely outsourced. The estimated TAM also includes businesses in which our public commercial real estate services competitors operate but where Newmark currently does not. We estimate that less than 20% of the potential revenue in the global commercial real estate services market is currently serviced by the top 10 global firms (by total revenues), leaving a large opportunity for us to reach clients through superior experience and high-quality service, relative to both our larger competitors and the significant number of fragmented smaller and regional companies. We believe that clients increasingly value full service real estate service providers with comprehensive capabilities and multi-jurisdictional reach. We expect this to provide Newmark a competitive advantage as we have full-service capabilities to service both real estate owners and occupiers.

Institutional Investor Demand for Commercial Real Estate. Institutions investing in real estate often compare their returns on investments in real estate to those of alternative asset classes, benchmark sovereign bonds, and investment-grade corporate bonds. Even with their recent rise, benchmark interest rates have remained below long-term average historical rates around the world over the past several years. For example, ten-year U.S. Treasuries averaged approximately 5.9% over the fifty years ended December 31, 2024.

The weighted average target allocation for all global institutional investors to real estate increased from 5.6% of their overall portfolios in 2010 to 10.8% in 2024, according to figures from an annual survey by Cornell University’s Baker Program in Real Estate and Hodes Weill & Associates. The Cornell survey estimates that the global target allocations will remain relatively flat at 10.7% in 2025. We expect these relatively high investor allocations to benefit our owner-focused businesses as interest rates and transaction activity normalize. According to data from Bloomberg (as of early February 2025), economists and futures market participants widely expect major central banks, including the Federal Reserve, to continue gradually lowering short term rates over the next two calendar years. We expect these interest rate movements will accelerate real estate capital markets activity.

One indication that investors remain ready to deploy capital toward real estate is the undeployed amounts held by global real estate focused institutions in closed-end funds. Preqin estimated that there was approximately $380 billion of investible funds held by such institutions as of January 31, 2025, versus $325 billion at the end of 2015 and $205 billion at year-end 2010. These figures exclude the significant amount of real estate assets already invested or held by other types of investors and owners, such as publicly traded REITs, non-traded REITs, and open-ended core property funds. According to the most recent data from MSCI, total global funds under management by real-estate focused institutional investors was $13.2 trillion in 2023. According to Preqin and Goldman Sachs, the subset of such institutional assets under management held by private credit funds focused on real estate debt is expected to grow from $150 billion in 2022 to more than $680 billion in 2027. These types of funds have correspondingly become a growing percentage of commercial and multifamily lending in the U.S. over the past two years.

Significant Levels of Commercial Mortgage Debt Outstanding and Upcoming Maturities. As of the most recently available data from the MBA, there is approximately $4.8 trillion in U.S. commercial and multifamily mortgage debt outstanding (excluding loans for acquisitions, development, and construction, as well as loans collateralized by owner-occupied commercial properties). Of this amount, approximately $2.1 trillion is expected to mature between 2025 and 2027. Refinancing typically makes up a significant portion of overall industry originations. For context, the MBA states that total U.S. commercial and multifamily originations were $891 billion in 2021, $816 billion in 2022, $429 billion in 2023, and an estimated $503 billion in 2024. As of February 2025, the MBA projects that U.S. originations will grow by 16% in 2025 and 22% in 2026. We expect the pullback in commercial real estate lending by banks will continue to drive a large percentage of investors and owners to find alternative solutions, including via the growing share of loans we expect to be originated by alternative lenders such as private credit funds and insurance companies. We anticipate a significant portion of debt maturities to be resolved not only through refinancing, which should help our mortgage brokerage and origination businesses, but also through the kinds of more complex and sophisticated restructurings, loan sales, and recapitalizations in which Newmark specializes. Our capital markets clients have sought, and we believe will continue to seek, our counsel with respect to addressing their related investing and financing needs. We expect our professionals to not only provide our clients with innovative capital markets solutions, but to offer integrated services from our experts across leasing, V&A, property management, servicing, and other areas of Newmark. By using a collaborative and multidisciplinary approach, we can provide our clients with extensive industry and product expertise along regional, national, and increasingly global reach across a wide variety of property types.

Expected Stabilization of Interest Rates. Steady interest rate environments typically stimulate our capital markets business, where demand is often dependent on attractive all-in borrowing rates versus expected asset yields. Demand also depends on credit accessibility and general macroeconomic trends. As interest rates stabilize, we expect this to increase demand for our origination, investment sales, and mortgage brokerage businesses.

Favorable Multifamily Demographics Driving Growth in Multifamily Originations and Sales. Increasing sales prices for single-family homes and condominiums relative to wages, the rise in mortgage rates, relatively low home construction rates over the past decade, an aging population, and immigration to the United States are among the factors increasing demand for new apartment living in the U.S., as well as for single-family rental housing. We expect these factors to support continued growth for our multifamily capital markets business, which provides integrated investment sales, mortgage brokerage, GSE/FHA lending, and loan servicing capabilities. We believe that the combination of these businesses has provided and will continue to have a multiplier effect that drives growth across the Company.

Trend Toward Outsourcing of Commercial Real Estate Services. We estimate that the outsourcing of real estate-related services has reduced both property owner and tenant costs, which has increased the profitability for those who utilize commercial real estate and spurred additional demand for property. We believe that the more than $400 billion global revenue opportunity includes a large percentage of companies and landlords that have not yet outsourced their commercial real estate functions, including many functions offered by our management services businesses. Large corporations are focused on consistency in service delivery and centralization of the real estate function and procurement to maximize cost savings and efficiencies in their real estate portfolios. This focus tends to lead them to choose full-service providers like Newmark, where customers can centralize service delivery and maximize cost savings. We expect our GCS and property management businesses to benefit from the continued growth of outsourcing. For those companies and landlords who do not outsource, we consult with them and offer technology solutions to facilitate self-management more efficiently. Our GCS business has seen increased demand for services relevant to these client needs. We believe that our outsourcing, consulting, and technology offerings allow us to engage further with clients and position us for opportunities to provide additional services to fulfill their needs.

See “Business Environment,” in Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for additional information regarding trends in market demand and competitive conditions, which is incorporated by reference herein.

Our Competitive Strengths

We believe our success has been driven by a unique combination of strategies, including:

Valuable Market Insight. The notional value of leasing, investments sales, mortgage brokerage, and GSE/FHA origination transactions that we facilitated, as well as the estimated value of all properties appraised by our V&A business, was nearly $1 trillion in 2024. This provides us with extraordinary and valuable insight across the commercial and multifamily real estate markets.

Expertise and Knowledge. Our comprehensive platform and in-depth knowledge of local, national, and global real estate markets, coupled with our strong understanding of commercial real estate as an asset class, ability to adapt to the evolving market and to shifts in the demand for our services, and deep relationships with users and owners empower us to supply an array of solutions for our clients.

Attracting and Retaining Talent. Newmark’s strong culture of innovation, and collaboration has helped us hire and retain a significant number of the industry’s most talented professionals over the past decade, while encouraging their innovative and entrepreneurial natures and empowering them through our technology, data analytics, and infrastructure. We believe this makes them better at what they do while strengthening client relationships and enabling our professionals to deliver higher returns for them. Over the past decade, Newmark has been able to provide full-service capabilities while maintaining a manageable scale and has gained market share and risen in relevant league table standings across many business lines. We have accomplished this in part by investing in leadership and recruiting the top performers across our diverse business lines and geographies to our platform.

Culture of Ownership. Our broad-based employee ownership, which was collectively 29% of our fully diluted shares as of December 31, 2024, helps to recruit and retain our talent, encourages an ownership mindset and shared long-term vision, and promotes cross-selling in an environment where our professionals work together within and across business lines to productively and creatively solve our clients’ real estate needs. We also believe that this ownership culture serves to align the interests of employees with those of our bondholders and stockholders.

Industry-Leading Revenue per Employee. Newmark’s focus is on higher revenue and higher margin businesses, which we believe helps make our professionals among the most productive among U.S.-listed full-service peers. For example, we believe Newmark’s total average revenue per employee was more than 70% higher than the average for our U.S.-listed full-service peers in 2023, which is the most recent year for which data is available for all relevant companies.

Full-Service Capabilities. We provide a fully integrated real estate services platform to meet the needs of our clients and seek to provide beginning-to-end services when relevant. We lead with capital markets, where we aim to build the number one platform in the U.S., while expanding our investment sales and debt businesses internationally. We expect this to have a continued multiplier effect on many of our other investor- and owner-focused revenue streams across the Company, including in GSE/FHA origination and loan servicing, V&A, property management, our underwriting, asset management, and servicing platform, and landlord representation leasing. We expect this virtuous circle to continue to drive our growth over time. We are also actively cross-selling our occupier-focused services, which are described above. Today’s clients are focused on consistency of service delivery and centralization of the real estate function and procurement, resulting in savings and efficiencies, and allowing them to focus on their core competencies. Our target clients increasingly award business to full-service commercial real estate services firms, a trend which we believe benefits our business over many of our competitors. Additionally, our capabilities afford us an advantage when competing for business from clients who are outsourcing real estate services for the first time, as well as clients seeking best in class data, industry knowledge, and technology solutions. We believe our comprehensive and collaborative approach to commercial real estate services has allowed our revenue sources to become well-diversified across services and key markets throughout the U.S., U.K., and increasingly, other global locations.

Opportunity to Grow Domestic and Global Footprint. In 2024, approximately 13% of our revenues were from international sources, while our largest, full-service, U.S.-listed competitors generated approximately 28% to 46% of their revenues outside the U.S. for the most recent fiscal years reported. We believe that our successful history of acquiring over 55 companies since 2011 and making profitable hires across our business lines and existing geographies demonstrates our ability to continue to grow substantially around the globe.

Strong and Diversified Client Relationships. We have long-standing relationships with many of the world’s largest commercial property owners, real estate developers and investors, and Fortune 500 and Forbes Global 2000 companies. We can provide beginning-to-end solutions for our clients through our management services offerings. This allows us to generate more recurring and predictable revenues. We generally have multi-year contracts to provide services, including repeatable transaction work, lease administration, project management, facilities management and consulting. In capital markets, we provide real estate investors and owners with property management and landlord representation during their ownership and assist them with maximizing their return on real estate investments through investment sales, debt and equity financing, lending and V&A services and real estate technology solutions. We believe that the many touch points we have with our clients gives us a competitive advantage in client-specific and overall industry knowledge, and that this has a multiplier effect that drives growth across the Company.

Strong Financial Position to Support High Growth. We generate significant earnings and have a long-term track record of generating strong and consistent cash flow. We had $197.7 million of cash and cash equivalents and $525.0 million available under our revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2024. We expect to use our strong financial position and cash flow generation to fuel our future growth.

Strong and Experienced Management Team. Our management team possesses deep leadership experience and subject matter expertise, benefiting both us and our clients. Our executive officers comprise a set of individuals with an average of more than 30 years of industry expertise and a wide range of range of backgrounds and experiences. Additionally, our geographic and business line leadership teams also average more than 30 years of industry experience. Together, these leadership teams represent our flat leadership structure and robust capabilities in both corporate strategy and production expertise.

Technology and Data Analytics

We recognize the transformative impact of technology on the broader commercial real estate industry and on evolving client expectations. We believe our technology portfolio, centered around customer needs, empowers our professionals to deliver exceptional real estate experiences and exceptional value. Newmark seeks to redefine industry standards and to leverage data-driven market, client, and property insights, alongside seamless transaction management and our proven client servicing capabilities. We believe that our holistic approach to internal data capture and integration with outside data providers can open up new revenue opportunities across nearly all of our service lines. The tight partnership between Newmark producers and our technology teams should enable cutting-edge solutions and highly productive technology investments. With a focus on the future and anticipating client needs, we expect this synergy to position our professionals with a competitive edge, as detailed below. We are committed to empowering our professionals with customized data and digital solutions intended to improve and optimize the client experience and help drive growth. For example, we have begun to implement an AI solution for use by our personnel designed to enable Newmark professionals to improve efficiencies by unburdening them from time-consuming routine tasks and enabling them to focus on value-add endeavors.

Integrated Capital Markets Platform. Our suite of capital markets products, intended for use by our investment sales, debt financing, and debt servicing personnel, captures critical data, which is then fed into our comprehensive capital markets insights platform. This integration can empower our professionals with valuable insights into investor, lender, and seller activity.

Newmark’s end-to-end digitization of the loan lifecycle used by our professionals connects pre-screeners, processors, business support, closers, underwriters, traders, and servicing on one platform. Through standardized workflows, automation, and system integrations, our digital loan underwriting tool is designed to reduce data input redundancy, improve productivity and accuracy, and reduce cycle times. We believe the integration between our capital markets products creates a convergence of investment and debt sales, financing, and servicing, harmonizing Newmark’s capital markets platform for operational efficiency.

Newmark’s internal deal management and customer relationship management solution facilitates the entire deal management process from lead generation to transaction closing. It provides a centralized platform for managing clients and prospects and allows for efficient tracking of investor activity through its transaction management module. Additionally, the solution integrates full-service conversion opportunities, which may enhance the potential for increased revenue. We believe that this software streamlines the deal management process for Newmark professionals, capturing pivotal data points from the inception of client interest to the finalization of deals.

Business Intelligence. Newmark offers internal self-service analytics dashboards that consolidate data from diverse sources, providing our professionals with valuable insights and intelligence to assist in their business pursuits. Newmark’s GCS technology, Newlitic, aggregates and integrates information across an enterprise’s real estate portfolio into one single platform. A flexible and intuitive tool for commercial real estate professionals, this software offers capabilities for multiple management reporting needs—including occupancy utilization, portfolio and lease administration, transaction management, capital projects and facilities management—through customizable web dashboards.

Property Intelligence. Newmark’s interactive site selection intelligence platform offers clients extensive market and property intelligence to aid in their location decision-making process. By leveraging data visualization, our interactive platform enables clients to make informed decisions based on demographics and logistics. Our digital tourbook generator, Spaceful, enhances the tour process for our clients through an intuitive mobile user experience. It allows brokerage teams to collaborate and make real-time adjustments, creating elegant tourbooks with auto-generated maps quickly. This software furthers our commitment to sustainability, by reducing the need for paper and streamlining collaboration and touring.

Full-Service V&A Product Suite. Newmark’s V&A digital solutions used by our professionals contain extensive repositories of sales data, comparable leases, and building operating expenses. Use of such datasets is intended to reduce appraisal modeling time while improving report accuracy. Our property management digital solution used by our professionals is designed to improve visibility into sales pipelines, new business pursuits, service agreements, and vendor management revenue. Processes are streamlined through centralization, notification automation, and simplified templates.

Industry Recognition

Over the past several years, we have consistently won a number of U.S. industry awards and accolades, been ranked highly by third-party sources, and significantly increased our rankings, which we believe reflects recognition of our performance and achievements. For example:

•#1 Top Mortgage Banking & Brokerage Firms, Commercial Property Executive & Multi-Housing News, 2025;

•#1 Top Office Brokers, MSCI, 2024;

•#1 Top Student Housing Lender, Freddie Mac, 2024;

•#2 Top Sales Firms, Commercial Property Executive, 2024;

•#2 Top Multifamily Brokerage Firms, Multi-Housing News, 2024;

•#2 Top Office Brokers, Real Estate Alert, 2024;

•#2 Top Brokers of Data-Center Properties, Real Estate Alert, 2024;

•#3 Top Seniors Housing DUS® Producers, Fannie Mae, 2024;

•#3 Top Apartment Brokers, MSCI, 2024;

•#3 Top Cross-Border Brokers, MSCI, 2024;

•#3 Top Brokers of Multi-Family Properties, Real Estate Alert, 2024;

•#3 Top Brokers of Self-Storage Properties, Real Estate Alert, 2024;

•#4 Top Leasing Firms, Commercial Property Executive, 2024;

•#4 Top Overall DUS® Producers, Fannie Mae, 2024;

•#4 Top Brokers by Investment Volume, MSCI, 2024;

•#5 Top Conventional Lender, Freddie Mac, 2024;

•Ranked among The Global Outsourcing 100® by the International Association of Outsourcing Professionals, 2024, for the 16th consecutive year;

•Named World’s Best Real Estate Consultant, Euro money, 2024; and

•Named among GlobeSt’s. ‘Best Places to Work’, 2024.

Clients

Our clients include a full range of real estate owners, occupiers, tenants, investors, lenders, small and medium size businesses, as well as multi-national corporations and some of the largest institutional owners of real estate in the world in numerous markets and across multiple property types, including office, retail, industrial, multifamily, student housing, hotel/lodging, data centers, healthcare, self-storage, land, condominium conversions, subdivisions and special use. Our clients vary greatly in size and complexity, and include for-profit and non-profit entities, governmental entities and public and private companies.

Sales and Marketing

We seek to develop our brand and highlight its expansive platform while reinforcing our position as a leading commercial real estate services firm globally through brand and corporate marketing, local marketing of specific business lines and targeted brokerage professional marketing efforts, as described below.

Global Brand and Corporate Marketing. Globally, we utilize media relations, industry sponsorships, social media, sales collateral and targeted advertising in trade and business publications to develop and market our brand. We believe that our emphasis on our unique capabilities enables us to demonstrate our strengths and differentiate ourselves from our competitors. Our multi-market business groups provide customized collateral, website and technology solutions designed to address specific client needs.

Local Market Expertise and Targeted Brokerage Professional Efforts. On a local level, our offices (including those owned by us and those independently owned by business partners) have access to tools and templates that provide our revenue-generating professionals with the market knowledge we believe is necessary to educate and advise clients, and also to bring properties to market quickly and effectively. These tools and templates include proprietary research and analyses, web-based marketing systems and ongoing communications and training about our depth and breadth of services. Our professionals use these local, national and global resources to participate directly in selling to, advising and servicing clients. We provide marketing services and materials to certain business partners as part of an overall agreement allowing them to use our branding. We also benefit from shared referrals and materials from local offices.

Leading Research Capabilities. We invest in and rely on comprehensive and proprietary research to support and guide the development of real estate and investment strategy for our clients. Research plays a key role in keeping colleagues attuned to important trends and changing conditions in world markets. We disseminate this information internally and externally directly to prospective clients and the marketplace through the company website, direct email, and social media. We believe that our investments in research and technology are critical to establishing our brand as a thought leader and expert in real estate-related matters and provide a key sales and marketing differentiator.

Intellectual Property

We hold various trademarks, trade dress and trade names and rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark, service mark and trade secret laws, as well as contractual restrictions, to establish and protect our intellectual property rights. We own numerous domain names and have registered numerous trademarks and/or service marks in the United States and foreign countries. We will continue to file additional patent applications on new inventions, as appropriate, demonstrating our commitment to technology and innovation. Although we believe our intellectual property rights play a role in maintaining our competitive position in a number of the markets that we serve, we do not believe we would be materially adversely affected by the expiration or termination of our trademarks or trade names or the loss of any of our other intellectual property rights. Our trademark registrations must be renewed periodically, and, in most jurisdictions, every 10 years.

Competition

We compete across a variety of business disciplines within the commercial real estate industry, including commercial property and facilities management, owner-occupier, property and landlord representation, property sales, valuation, capital markets (equity and debt) solutions, GSE/FHA lending and loan servicing, limited servicing and asset management, and special servicing. Each business discipline is highly competitive on a local, regional, national and global level. We also compete with other large multi-national firms that have similar or overlapping service competencies to ours, including CBRE Group, Inc., Colliers International Group Inc., Cushman & Wakefield PLC, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated, and Savills plc. In addition, more specialized large firms like Berkadia Proprietary Holding LLC, Eastdil Secured LLC, Knight Frank LLP, Marcus & Millichap Inc., and Walker & Dunlop, Inc. compete with us in certain service lines or property types. Depending on the geography, property type or service, we may compete with other commercial real estate service providers, including outsourcing companies such as Aramark, ISS A/S, and ABM Industries. We may also compete with firms that provide flexible office-space solutions, such as International Workplace Group PLC and WeWork Companies LLC. From time to time, we also compete with in-house corporate real estate departments, institutional lenders, insurance companies, investment banking firms, and accounting and consulting firms in various parts of our business. Despite recent consolidation, the commercial real estate services industry remains highly fragmented and competitive. Although many of our competitors are local or regional firms that are smaller than us, some of these competitors are more entrenched than us on a local or regional basis.

Seasonality

Due to the strong desire of many market participants to close real estate transactions prior to the end of a typical calendar year, our business exhibits certain seasonality, with our revenue tending to be lowest in the first quarter and strongest in the fourth quarter. This is particularly true for the industry across leasing, capital markets, and V&A. For the five years from 2020 through 2024, we generated an average of approximately 21% of our revenues in the first quarter and 30% of our revenues in the fourth quarter.

Partnership and Equity Overview

We expect many of our key brokerage professionals, salespeople and other professionals to have a substantial amount of their own capital invested in our business, aligning their interests with those of our stockholders. We control the general partner of Newmark Holdings. The limited partnership interests in Newmark Holdings consist of: (i) a special voting limited partnership interest held by us; (ii) exchangeable limited partnership interests held by Cantor; (iii) founding/working partner interests held by founding/working partners; (iv) limited partnership units, which consist of a variety of units that are generally held by employees such as REUs, RPUs, PSUs, PSIs, PSEs, LPUs, APSUs, APSIs, AREUs, ARPUs and NPSUs; and (v) Preferred Units, which are working partner interests that may be awarded to holders of, or contemporaneous with, the grant of certain limited partnership units. See “Our Organizational Structure.”

While Newmark Holdings limited partnership interests generally entitle our partners to participate in distributions of income from the operations of our business, upon leaving Newmark Holdings (or upon any other purchase of such limited partnership interests), any such partners will only be entitled to receive over time, and provided such partner does not violate certain partner obligations, an amount for their Newmark Holdings limited partnership interests that reflects such partner’s capital account or compensatory grant awards, excluding any goodwill or going concern value of our business unless Cantor, in the case of the Founding Partners, and we, as the general partner of Newmark Holdings, otherwise determine. Our partners will be able to receive the right to exchange their Newmark Holdings limited partnership interests for shares of our Class A common stock (if, in the case of Founding Partners, Cantor so determines and, in the case of working partners and limited partnership unit holders, we, as the Newmark Holdings general partner, with Cantor’s consent, determine otherwise) and thereby realize any higher value associated with our Class A common stock. We believe that employee equity ownership creates a sense of responsibility for the health and performance of our business and a strong incentive to maximize our revenues and profitability. See “—Human Capital Management—Performance-Based and Highly Retentive Compensation Structure,” “—Our Organizational Structure,” and the information contained under “Risks Related to Our Relationship with Cantor and Its Respective Affiliates” included in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors.

Regulation

The brokerage of real estate sales and leasing transactions, property and facilities management, conducting real estate valuation and securing debt for clients and other business lines require that we comply with regulations affecting the real estate industry and maintain licenses in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Like other market participants that operate in numerous jurisdictions and in various business lines, we must comply with numerous regulatory regimes.

We could be required to pay fines, return commissions, have a license suspended or revoked, or be subject to other adverse actions if we conduct regulated activities without a license or violate applicable rules and regulations. Licensing requirements could also impact our ability to engage in certain types of transactions, change how we conduct business or affect the cost of conducting business. We and our licensed associates may be subject to various obligations, and we could become subject to claims by regulators and/or participants in real estate sales or other services claiming that we did not fulfill our obligations. This could include claims with respect to alleged conflicts of interest where we act, or are perceived to be acting, for two or more clients. While management has overseen highly regulated businesses before and expects us to comply with all applicable regulations in a satisfactory manner, no assurance can be given that it will always be the case. In addition, federal, state and local laws and regulations impose various environmental zoning restrictions, use controls, and disclosure obligations that impact the management, development, use and/or sale of real estate. Such laws and regulations tend to discourage sales and leasing activities, as well as mortgage lending availability, with respect to such properties. In our role as property or facilities manager, we could incur liability under environmental laws for the investigation or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances or wastes relating to properties we currently or formerly managed. Such liability may be imposed without regard for the lawfulness of the original disposal activity, or our knowledge of, or fault for, the release or contamination. Further, liability under some of these laws and regulations may be joint and several, meaning that one of multiple liable parties could be responsible for all costs related to a contaminated site. Certain requirements governing the removal or encapsulation of asbestos-containing materials, as well as recently enacted local ordinances obligating property or facilities managers to inspect for and remove lead-based paint in certain buildings, could increase our costs of regulatory compliance and potentially subject us to claims of violations by regulatory agencies or others. Additionally, under certain circumstances, failure by our brokerage professionals acting as agents for a seller or lessor to disclose environmental contamination at a property could result in liability to a buyer or lessee of an affected property.

We are required to meet and maintain various eligibility criteria from time to time established by the GSEs and HUD, as well as applicable state and local licensing agencies, to maintain our status as an approved lender. These criteria include minimum net worth, operational liquidity and collateral requirements, and compliance with reporting requirements. We also are required to originate our loans and perform our loan servicing functions in accordance with the applicable program requirements and guidelines from time to time established by the GSEs and HUD. For additional information, see “Risks Related to Our Mortgage Servicing Business—Changes in relationships with GSEs and HUD could adversely affect our ability to originate commercial real estate loans through such programs, although we also provide debt and equity to our clients through other third-party capital sources. Compliance with the minimum collateral and risk-sharing requirements of such programs, as well as applicable state and local licensing agencies, could reduce our liquidity” included in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors.

Newmark is subject to various capital requirements in connection with seller/servicer agreements that Newmark has entered into with the various GSEs. Failure to maintain minimum capital requirements could result in Newmark’s inability to originate and service loans for the respective GSEs and could have a direct material adverse effect on Newmark’s consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2024, Newmark met all capital requirements. As of December 31, 2024, the most restrictive capital requirement was Fannie Mae’s net worth requirement. Newmark exceeded the minimum requirement by $370.2 million.

Certain of Newmark’s agreements with Fannie Mae allow Newmark to originate and service loans under Fannie Mae’s DUS program. These agreements require Newmark to maintain sufficient collateral to meet Fannie Mae’s restricted and operational liquidity requirements based on a pre-established formula. Certain of Newmark’s agreements with Freddie Mac allow Newmark to service loans under the Freddie Mac TAH. These agreements require Newmark to pledge sufficient collateral to meet Freddie Mac’s liquidity requirement of 8% of the outstanding principal of TAH loans serviced by Newmark. As of December 31, 2024, Newmark met all liquidity requirements.

In addition, as a servicer for Fannie Mae, GNMA and FHA, Newmark is required to advance to investors any uncollected principal and interest due from borrowers. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, outstanding borrower advances were approximately $0.5 million and $1.6 million, respectively, and are included in “Other assets” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

In order to continue our business in our current structure, we and Newmark Holdings must not be deemed investment companies under the Investment Company Act. We intend to take all legally permissible action to ensure that such entities are not subject to such Act. For additional information, see “Risks Related to Our Corporate and Partnership and Equity Structure—If we or Newmark Holdings were deemed an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act, the Investment Company Act’s restrictions could make it impractical for us to continue our business and structure as contemplated and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects” included in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors.

Human Capital Management

Human Capital Resources. Newmark is an organization built on strong values, employee engagement and ownership. At our core we are committed to our employees by providing them with an opportunity to participate in our success. We believe that by cultivating a dynamic mix of people and ideas, we enrich the performance of our businesses, the experiences of our employee base, and the level of engagement in the communities in which we operate. We value hard work, innovation, superior client service, strong ethics and governance and equal employment opportunity. Further, philanthropy is woven into our corporate culture. We believe these values foster sustainable, profitable growth. We strive to be exemplary corporate citizens and honor high ethical principles in our interactions with other businesses, our employees and the communities in which we live and work.

Workforce. As of December 31, 2024, we had nearly 7,500 employees in approximately 140 offices in 120 cities. The expenses of approximately 1,200 of those employees are partially or fully reimbursed by clients, mainly in our property management and GCS businesses. In addition, and as of this same date, Newmark has licensed its name to certain independently owned commercial real estate providers we consider business partners, with more than 400 employees of such business partners operating in various locations where Newmark does not operate. As of December 31, 2024, Newmark and our business partners together operated from approximately 170 offices with over 8,000 professionals across four continents.

We also receive support services from certain employees who also work for Cantor and its affiliates and who provide services to us pursuant to our Administrative Services Agreement with Cantor and devote some or all of their time to Newmark. Generally, employees are not subject to any collective bargaining agreements, except approximately 240 employees in the United States, all of whom are employees for which the expenses are fully reimbursed by our clients, and for certain of our employees based in our European offices who are covered by the national, industry-wide collective bargaining agreements relevant to the countries/sectors in which they work.

Our non-U.S. headcount has grown in recent years, including for our India offshoring operations, the hiring of new international professionals across capital markets, leasing, V&A, and GCS, and certain acquisitions. We expect our international headcount to increase as we continue to expand our global operations.

We have invested significantly through acquisitions, technology spending and the hiring of new brokerage professionals, salespeople, managers and other front-office personnel. The market for these acquisitions has been competitive, and it is expected that these conditions will persist for the foreseeable future. We have attracted best-in-class professionals to our platform, which is known for scale, technology and expertise.

Human Capital Measures and Objectives. In response to shifting client demands, we seek to also manage our human capital resources as we expand service offerings and geographies in order to maximize profitability.

Our human capital measures and objectives include those related to employee headcount. During 2024, we saw a decrease in voluntary turnover year-on-year in all parts of the organization. Our retention rate for our managers, brokers, salespeople, and other revenue-generating personnel improved measurably compared with 2023, reflecting industry trends and the strong retention incentives for our talent.

We continue to invest in the business by adding high profile and talented producers and other revenue-generating professionals. In 2024, we continued to expand our presence in the U.K. as well as in Europe, including launching brokerage businesses in France and Germany. From a human capital perspective, we have made some key management hires in 2024 and expect them to be continued areas of growth in the future.

From time to time, we engage in cost-savings initiatives, including reducing the number of employees to improve margins. We are also focused on driving margin expansion through the use of technology to improve our workforce’s productivity and rationalizing our cost structure to drive increased efficiencies and through the use of nearshoring and offshoring where appropriate. As an example of the latter, our India offshoring operation now consists of nearly 800 employees in 2024, compared with over 510 in 2023.

Human Capital and Social Policies and Practices. We are committed to our people, our stockholders and the community as a whole. We have a variety of programs to incentivize and support our employees, from employee ownership to comprehensive benefits and training. We are also committed to equal employment opportunity, and other policies and practices designed to fulfill our commitment to social and human capital development.

Attracting and Retaining the Best Talent. Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain talented, productive and skilled employees to transact with our clients in a challenging and regulated environment that is experiencing ever-increasing competition for talent. We are investing in fostering an inclusive and incentivized work environment where our people can deliver their best work every day. In 2021 and in 2024, we were named by GlobeSt.com as one of commercial real estate’s “Best Places to Work.” Newmark was ranked #1 on LinkedIn’s 2022 “Top Companies in Real Estate” list, which ranks the top 25 companies at which to grow a career in the industry.

Safe, Empowering, and Flexible Work Environment. We recognize that the health and well-being of our employees is fundamentally linked to the success of our organization. We have implemented significant measures to create a safe work environment. In addition to ensuring our offices meet applicable state and local regulatory standards, Newmark maintains a comprehensive Health and Safety Manual that guides our policies and procedures in compliance with federal standards enforced by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Our employees receive safety awareness training via Newmark’s online safety training platform, providing access to over 1,000 courses across three safety catalogs. We are committed to a culture that is built around the evolving needs of our talented workforce, promoting safety, empowerment, and flexibility. As part of this commitment, we proudly offer a comprehensive benefits package crafted to enhance our culture and support the success of our employees, both at work and home. To facilitate the retention of our employees, we also provide additional benefits, including a 401(k) match.

Performance-Based and Highly Retentive Compensation Structure. Virtually all of our key executives and producers have equity or partnership stakes in the Company and its subsidiaries. Generally, they receive deferred equity, limited partnership units or RSUs as part of their compensation. As of December 31, 2024, our employees and independent contractors, partners, executive officers and directors owned approximately 29% of our equity on a fully diluted basis. We issue limited partnership units and other forms of equity-based compensation, such as RSUs, which:

•Provide liquidity to our partners and employees over time;

•Align the interests of our partners and employees and management with those of common stockholders;

•Help motivate and retain key partners and employees; and

•Encourage a collaborative culture that drives cross-selling and growth.

The non-exchangeable partnership units held by our partners are subject to forfeiture (such as if the non-compete, confidentiality or non-solicit provisions of the Newmark Holdings limited partnership agreement are violated), and unvested restricted stock units are subject to service conditions that must be met in order for them to vest into shares of Newmark common stock. In addition, any partnership amounts paid following termination of service generally are paid over a number of years to ensure compliance with partner obligations. This compensation structure has proven to be highly retentive, and since 2015, we have retained approximately 93% of our top-performing producers.

We also enter into various agreements with certain of our employees and partners. Many of these individuals receive loans that may be either wholly or in part repaid from the proceeds of sales of the employees’ shares of our Class A common stock or distribution earnings that the individual receives on some or all of their limited partnership units, or that may be forgiven over a period of time. These loans provide incentives and promote entrepreneurship, retention and long-term engagement.

Compensation Recovery/Clawback Policy. The Company has adopted a compensation recovery (“clawback”) policy for its executive officers effective as of December 1, 2023, with retroactive applicability to October 2, 2023. The policy applies to compensation received by the company’s executive officers that results from the attainment of a financial reporting measure based on or derived from financial information (“Incentive-Based Compensation”). The policy provides for the recovery of Incentive-Based Compensation received by a covered person in the event of an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements that is in excess of the Incentive-Based Compensation that such person would have received based upon the restated financial reporting measure. The policy only applies to Incentive-Based Compensation and does not apply to compensation that is purely discretionary or purely based on subjective goals or goals unrelated to financial reporting measures.

Equal Employment Opportunity. We are committed to equal employment opportunity, and other policies and practices that seek to further our development of a productive and inclusive workplace. We consider all qualified applicants for job openings and promotions without regard to race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin or ancestry, age, disability, service in the armed forces, or any other protected characteristic. We continue to develop initiatives to support these values.

Fairness in Pay. We are dedicated to our efforts to achieve pay fairness. Our promotion and compensation processes are designed to enable us to treat employees fairly with respect to pay and opportunity and our compensation decisions are differentiated based on performance.

Talent remains at the core of who we are as a company, and we remain committed to having a culture built around fairness, equal employment opportunity and inclusion and developing a talented workforce with a range of backgrounds and experiences, including through our active participation in various initiatives. We also participate in job fairs and job boards that are focused on reaching a broad applicant pool of qualified applicants with a range of backgrounds, perspectives, and experiences.

Employee Engagement, Communication, Career Management and Training and Development. We invest in our employees’ long-term development and engagement by delivering training and development programs and a culture where our people can thrive and maximize their potential. We require mandatory annual training in workplace respect and inclusion on various topics including, anti-money laundering, and anti-crime, global sanctions, ethics, cybersecurity and anti-harassment and anti-discrimination among other topics. We also provide or support periodic job-specific and other developmental training and support for our employees so they can maximize their potential, as well as tuition reimbursement programs to eligible employees.

We provide virtual and in-person leadership training to managers on topics, including management effectiveness, communication skills, interview skills, writing and delivering effective performance evaluations, and other topics. This training is supplemented by a comprehensive library of on-line training courses that managers and employees may access. Finally, our individual business lines offer ongoing learning and development opportunities tied to deepening the subject matter expertise of their professionals.

Our success depends on employees understanding how their work and engagement contribute to our strategy, culture, values and regulatory environment. We use various channels to facilitate open and direct communication, including internal calls and meetings with employees, training and policy updates, and our social outings and events.

Succession Planning and Retention. From time to time, the Board discusses succession planning, including our consideration of succession strategy, the impact of any potential absence due to illness or leave of certain key executive officers or employees, as well as competing demands on the time of certain of our executive officers who also provide services to Cantor, BGC and its consolidated subsidiaries, and various other ventures and investments sponsored by Cantor. Our Board also discusses from time to time, as part of its succession planning, engagement and encouragement of future business leaders and the process of introducing directors to leaders in our business lines, including discussing business strategies and challenges with our existing senior business leaders. The Board may also discuss short-term succession in the event that certain of the senior executive officers should, on an interim or unexpected basis, become temporarily unable to fulfill their duties. The Board also considers hiring and retention of leaders required for the changing business landscape and to lead future business lines. Such individuals could include internal and external candidates. Additionally, we have implemented identification and tracking of candidates with a range of backgrounds and experience as part of our succession planning efforts.

Our succession discussions were particularly relevant in 2024 as, in November 2024, Mr. Lutnick, our Executive Chairman, was nominated as the 41st U.S. Secretary of Commerce. Mr. Lutnick was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on February 18, 2025 and stepped down from all of his positions with Newmark and as Chairman of the Board. Our Board has elected Mr. Kyle Lutnick and Mr. Stephen M. Merkel, our Chief Legal Officer, to join our Board of Directors and Mr. Merkel to serve as Chairman of the Board. Mr. Gosin will take on additional responsibilities with our operating companies and will serve as our Principal Executive Officer. See “Recent Board of Directors and Executive Officers Changes.”

Wehave taken strong steps to ensure the retention of our executive officers, including Messrs. Gosin and Rispoli, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively. The employment agreement entered into with Mr. Gosin on February 10, 2023 and the employment agreement entered into with Mr. Rispoli on September 29, 2022, each provide strong incentives for our key executive officers to continue providing their services to the Company. The high proportion of equity-based compensation in Messrs. Gosin and Rispoli’s respective employment agreements further align their interests with those of our stockholders. In February 2025, Mr. Merkel also entered into a change of control agreement to facilitate continuous service during any change in control.

Corporate Responsibility, Environmental, Social and Governance and Sustainability. We believe our business-focused corporate responsibility and ESG policies and practices support our efforts to be an exemplary corporate citizen, creates sustainable long-term value for Newmark, our stockholders and other stakeholders, our clients and our employees, and helps us mitigate risks, reduce costs, protect brand value, and capitalize on market opportunities. As Newmark continues to expand globally, we expect that our ESG programs will add value and enhance the sustainable business solutions for our clients and positively impact the communities in which our clients and we operate.

Our Board-level ESG Committee provides oversight with respect to our ESG policies and practices. The ESG Committee charter may be found on our website atwww.nmrk.com/esg/governance under the heading “Environmental, Social and Governance Committee Charter.” With the Board’s and the ESG Committee’s oversight, we are embedding social and human capital, employment, environmental, sustainability, charitable and corporate governance policies and practices into our corporate strategy, compensation, disclosure, and goals to maintain and advance long-term value for our investors.

Newmark supports sustainable business practices and is focused on taking the steps necessary to continue developing our sustainability program internally and further develop the sustainability-related services we offer our clients. We retained a nationally certified women-owned firm to assist our leadership in this endeavor. We also established an ESG Executive Committee, comprised of key Company executives and other senior leaders, to provide direction for Newmark’s ESG and sustainability progress and initiatives. Their results include:

•The publication of our first Corporate Responsibility Report in 2023 and expected publication of our second report this spring;

•Prioritization of industry-relevant ESG topics to guide our actions, informed by management, market, employee and investor interests and ESG standards;

•Engagement on ESG topics to meet business and client objectives; and

•Recognition as a Green Lease Leader from the Department of Energy and Institute for Market Transformation for sustainability and green lease guidance used internally and shared with clients.

Our Environmental Focus, Workplace Strategies and Sustainable Business Practices. We are focused on the environment and recognize the importance of treating our natural resources with respect so that they are available to future generations. Building operations have a significant impact on the environment, and as technology continues to place greater demands on building systems for power and cooling, energy consumption is expected to continue to rise at an unsustainable rate. As one of the largest global commercial real estate service providers, we believe it is our responsibility to improve energy efficiency and reduce energy consumption to protect the environment through continuous improvement of building practices. Newmark has a public-facing Environmental Policy that highlights our strategies toward reducing resource consumption, assessing performance through utility data collection and upholding stakeholder interests around environmental performance. We understand that sustainable buildings provide a better work environment, increase building efficiency, and reduce the environmental impact of building operations, and recognize that this requires continuous improvement in our own spaces and increasingly sophisticated support for our clients.

As a responsible business, we are acutely aware of climate change and other major issues affecting the environment. We also understand the impact commercial real estate can have on the health of the environment. That is why we encourage sustainable building practices and, in our GCS business and property management assignments, recommend strategies to clients to maximize energy efficiency, recycle materials and limit waste. These goals apply to Newmark’s offices as well as to the work we do for our clients, whether in selecting a location, building out space or managing an asset. Newmark’s property, facilities and energy/sustainability management teams work internally and with clients to reduce energy demand and carbon emissions. Newmark is increasingly collecting and measuring environmental data and this data is used to build client strategies around energy efficiency and renewable energy supply initiatives.

We are taking steps to minimize the environmental impact and carbon footprint of our corporate offices. We have updated our site selection guidelines to prioritize more energy efficient and sustainably managed spaces. We also updated our energy efficiency policy, our interior fit-out standards and our waste reduction policy. We continue to explore strategies for reducing our greenhouse gas emissions, increasing use of renewable energy, conserving water, and reducing waste. Newmark is working with the owners and property management teams that oversee the buildings we occupy to collect accurate and actionable energy data. As this data becomes more available, Newmark plans to implement energy efficiency initiatives where possible that will help lower our overall carbon footprint. We are also investigating the purchase of renewable energy supply where possible in deregulated energy markets. For all newly leased space for Newmark, we generally consider green lease options and strive to build and operate a sustainable workplace. Newmark occupies over a dozen buildings that are LEED certified and over 30 that are Energy Star certified. For example, our New York City headquarters at 125 Park Avenue is in a building that has received U.S. Green Building Council LEED Gold certification and is also Energy Star certified.

Environmental Policy and Energy and Sustainable Service Reference Guide. We have a policy with respect to the responsible environmental management of our operations. We are creating a baseline to understand and minimize the impact that our business has on the environment and are actively searching for ways to reduce our footprint. We are pursuing traditional, as well as new and innovative, methods to achieve our goals.

Further information on our policy can be found on our website atwww.nmrk.com/esg/environmental under the heading “Environmental Policy.”

Energy and sustainability are growing areas of focus for our clients and client services. Since 2017, Newmark’s Energy and Sustainability Services team has led energy management initiatives for Newmark clients. The team partners with clients to help identify, develop and manage green building investments, pursue Energy Star certifications, manage their greenhouse gas emissions inventory, and establish long-term energy conservation measures to help meet their corporate decarbonization and net zero emissions goals. The team utilizes a cloud-based Energy Intelligence Platform that empowers clients with access to their utility data, offers facility utility bill payment services and manages third-party procurement contracts, which it integrates with Energy Star reporting. To support our services, we have also developed an Energy and Sustainability Services Reference Guide, available atwww.nmrk.com/storage-nmrk/uploads/documents/Newmark-Energy-and-Sustainability-Services-Guide_2023.pdf, which assists clients and property teams in reducing the environmental impact of property operations, maintenance and construction associated with real estate assets.

For more information about our policies and these initiatives and services provided to clients and within our own facilities as they evolve, please refer to our website atwww.nmrk.com/esg.

Newmark annually publishes further details on our policies and programs in a Corporate Responsibility Report including employee resources, learning and development programs and supplier and vendor practices. You may also find our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the charters of the committees of our Board of Directors, Policy Statement on Hedging information about our charitable initiatives and other sustainability and ESG policies and practices on our website. The information contained in such report and on, or accessed through, our website, is not part of, and not incorporated into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

OUR ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

Current Organizational Structure

Dual Class Equity Structure of Newmark Group, Inc. We have a dual class equity structure, consisting of shares of Newmark Class A common stock and Newmark Class B common stock. We expect to retain and have no plans to change our dual class structure.

Newmark Class A common stock. Each share of Newmark Class A common stock is generally entitled to one vote on matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. As of December 31, 2024, there were 224,490,246 shares of Newmark Class A common stock issued and 149,506,832 shares outstanding. As of December 31, 2024, Cantor and CFGM held no shares of Newmark Class A common stock. See “—Partnership Exchange Rights into Newmark Class A and Class B Common Stock,” below, for a discussion of developments after December 31, 2024.

Newmark Class B common stock. Each share of Newmark Class B common stock is generally entitled to the same rights as a share of Newmark Class A common stock, except that, on matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders, each share of Newmark Class B common stock is entitled to 10 votes. The Newmark Class B common stock generally votes together with the Newmark Class A common stock on all matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders. As of December 31, 2024, Cantor and CFGM held 21,285,533 shares of Newmark Class B common stock, representing all of the outstanding shares of Newmark Class B common stock and approximately 58.8% of our total voting power.

Shares of Newmark Class B common stock are convertible into shares of Newmark Class A common stock at any time in the discretion of the holder on a one-for-one basis. Accordingly, if Cantor and CFGM had converted all of their shares of Newmark Class B common stock into shares of Newmark Class A common stock as of December 31, 2024, they would have collectively held 12.5% of the voting power in Newmark and the other stockholders of Newmark would have held 87.5% of the voting power in Newmark (and the indirect economic interests in Newmark OpCo would remain unchanged). In addition, if as of December 31, 2024 (1) Cantor and CFGM continued to hold shares of Newmark Class B common stock and (2) Cantor exchanged all of the 25,750,090 Newmark Holdings exchangeable limited partnership units then held by Cantor for shares of Newmark Class B common stock, Cantor and CFGM would have held 76.6% of the voting power in Newmark, and the stockholders of Newmark other than Cantor and CFGM would have held 23.4% of the voting power in Newmark.

Cantor has pledged 5,000,000 shares of Class B common stock held by it to Bank of America, N.A. in connection with certain partner loans. There are no circumstances under which the holders of Newmark Class B common stock would be required to convert their shares of Newmark Class B common stock into shares of Newmark Class A common stock, absent the exercise of the pledge in the event of foreclosure. Our Certificate of Incorporation does not provide for automatic conversion of shares of Newmark Class B common stock into shares of Newmark Class A common stock upon the occurrence of any event.

Partnership Structure of Newmark Holdings and Newmark OpCo. At Newmark Group, Inc., we are a holding company that holds partnership interests as described below, serves as the general partner of Newmark Holdings and, through Newmark Holdings, acts as the general partner of Newmark OpCo. As a result of our ownership of the general partnership interest in Newmark Holdings and Newmark Holdings’ general partnership interest in Newmark OpCo, we consolidate Newmark OpCo’s results for financial reporting purposes.

We hold the Newmark Holdings general partnership interest and the Newmark Holdings special voting limited partnership interest, which entitle us to remove and appoint the general partner of Newmark Holdings and serve as the general partner of Newmark Holdings, which entitles us to control Newmark Holdings. Newmark Holdings, in turn, holds the Newmark OpCo general partnership interest and the Newmark OpCo special voting limited partnership interest, which entitle Newmark Holdings to remove and appoint the general partner of Newmark OpCo, and serve as the general partner of Newmark OpCo, which entitles Newmark Holdings (and thereby us) to control Newmark OpCo. In addition, as of December 31, 2024, we directly held Newmark OpCo limited partnership interests consisting of approximately 173,965,102 units, representing approximately 69.2% of the outstanding Newmark OpCo limited partnership interests.

Cantor, founding partners, working partners and limited partnership unit holders directly hold Newmark Holdings limited partnership interests. Newmark Holdings, in turn, holds Newmark OpCo limited partnership interests and, as a result, Cantor, founding partners, working partners and limited partnership unit holders indirectly have interests in Newmark OpCo limited partnership interests.

The Newmark Holdings limited partnership interests are held and designated as follows:

•Newmark Holdings limited partnership interests held by Cantor and CFGM are designated as Newmark Holdings exchangeable limited partnership interests;

•Newmark Holdings limited partnership interests held by the founding partners are designated as Newmark Holdings founding partner interests;

•Newmark Holdings limited partnership interests held by working partners are designated as Newmark Holdings working partner interests; and

•Newmark Holdings limited partnership interests held by limited partnership unit holders are designated as limited partnership units.

Partnership Exchange Rights into Newmark Class A and Class B Common Stock. Each Newmark Holdings limited partnership interest held by Cantor and CFGM is generally exchangeable with us for a number of shares of Newmark Class B common stock (or, at Cantor’s option or if there are no additional authorized but unissued shares of Newmark Class B common stock, a number of shares of Newmark Class A common stock) equal to the Exchange Ratio.

As of December 31, 2024, 2,113,360 founding/working partner interests were outstanding. These founding/working partner interests were issued in the Separation to holders of BGC Holdings founding/working partner interests, who received such founding/working partner interests in connection with BGC Partners’ acquisition of the BGC Partners business from Cantor in 2008. The Newmark Holdings limited partnership interests held by founding/working partners are not exchangeable with us unless (1) Cantor acquires Cantor Units from Newmark Holdings upon termination or bankruptcy of the founding/working partners or redemption of their units by Newmark Holdings (which it has the right to do under certain circumstances), in which case such interests will be exchangeable with us for shares of Newmark Class A common stock or Newmark Class B common stock as described above, or (2) Cantor determines that such interests can be exchanged by such founding/working partners with us for Newmark Class A common stock, with each Newmark Holdings unit exchangeable for a number of shares of Newmark Class A common stock equal to the exchange ratio (which was initially one, but is subject to adjustment as set forth in the Separation and Distribution Agreement), on terms and conditions to be determined by Cantor (which exchange of certain interests Cantor expects to permit from time to time). Cantor has provided that certain founding/working partner interests are exchangeable with us for Class A common stock, with each Newmark Holdings unit exchangeable for a number of shares of Newmark Class A common stock equal to the exchange ratio (which was initially one, but is subject to adjustment as set forth in the Separation and Distribution Agreement), in accordance with the terms of the Newmark Holdings limited partnership agreement. Once a Newmark Holdings founding/working partner interest becomes exchangeable, such founding/working partner interest is automatically exchanged upon a termination or bankruptcy with us for Newmark Class A common stock.

We also provide exchangeability for partnership units into Newmark Class A common stock in connection with (1) our partnership redemption, compensation and restructuring programs, (2) other incentive compensation arrangements and (3) business combination transactions.

As of December 31, 2024, 77,251,954 limited partnership units were outstanding (including founding/working partner interests and working partner interests, and units held by Cantor). Limited partnership units will be only exchangeable with us in accordance with the terms and conditions of the grant of such units, which terms and conditions are determined in our sole discretion, as the Newmark Holdings general partner, with the consent of the Newmark Holdings exchangeable limited partnership interest majority in interest, in accordance with the terms of the Newmark Holdings limited partnership agreement.

The exchange ratio between Newmark Holdings limited partnership interests and Newmark Class A or Class B common stock was initially one. However, this exchange ratio will be adjusted in accordance with the terms of the Separation and Distribution Agreement if our dividend policy and the distribution policy of Newmark Holdings are different. As of December 31, 2024, the exchange ratio was 0.9279.

As of December 31, 2024, Cantor was obligated to distribute 7,221,277 shares of Class A common stock to certain current and former partners of Cantor to satisfy certain deferred stock distribution obligations provided to such partners (i) on April 1, 2008, and (ii) on February 14, 2012 in connection with Cantor’s payment of previous quarterly partnership distributions. Certain Cantor partners had elected to receive their distributed shares in 2008 and 2012, respectively, and others had elected to defer receipt of their shares until a future date.

On February 18, 2025, Cantor exercised exchange rights with respect to 7,782,387 exchangeable limited partnership interests held by it, at the then-current Exchange Ratio of 0.9279, for 7,221,277 shares of Class A common stock, which Newmark issued to Cantor in reliance on the exemption from registration under the Securities Act provided by Section 4(a)(2) thereof for transactions not involving a public offering, and then immediately delivered those 7,221,277 shares of Class A Common Stock to those certain current and former Cantor partners in satisfaction of all its remaining distribution rights obligations to them. After this event, Cantor held 19,787,703 limited partnership interests, 69,469,567 limited partnership units were outstanding, and 159,223,231 shares of Class A common stock were outstanding. This issuance will not change the fully diluted number of shares outstanding.

With each exchange, our direct and indirect interest in Newmark OpCo will proportionately increase because, immediately following an exchange, Newmark Holdings will redeem the Newmark Holdings unit so acquired for the Newmark OpCo limited partnership interest underlying such Newmark Holdings unit.

Allocation of Profits and Losses. The profit and loss of Newmark OpCo are allocated to Newmark Holdings and Newmark Group based on the total number of Newmark OpCo units held by each of those entries outstanding.

Ownership Structure. The following diagram illustrates the ownership structure of Newmark as of December 31, 2024. The diagram does not reflect the various subsidiaries of Newmark, Newmark OpCo or Cantor (including certain operating subsidiaries that are organized as corporations whose equity is either wholly-owned by Newmark or whose equity is majority-owned by Newmark with the remainder owned by Newmark OpCo) or the results of any exchange of Newmark Holdings exchangeable limited partnership interests or, to the extent applicable, Newmark Holdings founding partner interests, Newmark Holdings working partner interests or Newmark Holdings limited partnership units.

STRUCTURE OF NEWMARK AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2024

(1) Excludes unrestricted Class A common stock owned by employees.

(2) Cantor includes Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. and CFGM. Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. has 12.3% of the economics and 57.8% of the voting power in Newmark Group, Inc. CFGM has 0.2% of the economics and 1.0% of the voting power in Newmark Group, Inc.

The diagram reflects the following activity in Newmark Class A common stock and Newmark Holdings partnership unit activity from January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024: (a) an aggregate of 16,017,135 limited partnership units granted by Newmark Holdings; (b) 17,729,096 shares of Newmark Class A common stock repurchased by us; (c) 863,722 limited partnership interests purchased by us; (d) 257,378 shares of Newmark Class A common stock forfeited; (e) 2,399,349 shares of Newmark Class A common stock issued for vested restricted stock units; (f) 486,987 shares of Newmark Class A common stock issued by us under our acquisition shelf Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-231616), but not the 17,318,904 of such shares remaining available for issuance by us under such Registration Statement; (g) 12,831 shares of Class A common stock issued to Cantor in exchange for 13,861 exchangeable limited partnership interests; and (h) 481,570 terminated limited partnership units.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. These filings are also available to the public from the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov.

Our website address iswww.nmrk.com. Through our website, we make available, free of charge, the following documents as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC: our Annual Reports on Form 10-K; our proxy statements for our annual and special stockholder meetings; our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q; our Current Reports on Form 8-K; Forms 3, 4 and 5 and Schedules 13D filed on behalf of Cantor, CFGM, our directors and our executive officers; and amendments to those documents. Our website also contains additional information with respect to our financial results, business, and industry. Investors can sign up for email alerts informing them of when certain new information is posted to the investor relations portion of our website by navigating toir.nmrk.com/resources/investor-email-alerts. The information contained on, or that may be accessed through, our website is not part of, and is not incorporated into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

An investment in shares of our Class A common stock, our 7.500% Senior Notes or our other securities involves risks and uncertainties, including the potential loss of all or a part of your investment. The following are important risks and uncertainties that could affect our business, but we do not ascribe any particular likelihood or probability to them unless specifically indicated. Before making an investment decision to purchase our Class A common stock, our 7.500% Senior Notes or our other securities, you should carefully read and consider all of the risks and uncertainties described below, as well as other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and the consolidated financial statements and related notes included herein. The occurrence of any of the following risks or additional risks and uncertainties that are currently immaterial or unknown could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, liquidity, result of operations, cash flows or prospects.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

Risks Related to Global Economic and Market Conditions

General conditions in the economy, commercial real estate market and the banking sector (including perceptions of such conditions) can have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Commercial real estate markets are cyclical and traditionally relate to the condition of the economy or, at least, to the perceptions of investors and users as to the relevant economic outlook or market factors. For example, companies may be hesitant to expand their office space or enter into long-term real estate commitments if they are concerned about the general economic environment or perceive a diminishing need for office space. Companies under financial pressure or attempting to more aggressively manage their expenses may reduce the size of their workforces, limit capital expenditures, including with respect to office space, permit more staff to work from home and/or seek corresponding reductions in office space and related management or other services. Inflation and other macroeconomic pressures in the United States and the global economy, such as fluctuating interest rates, new or increased tariffs imposed by the U.S. and foreign governments and other factors driving trade uncertainty and inflationary pressures, supply chain disruptions, reductions in government spending, including on infrastructure, recession fears, and geopolitical conflicts, such as Russia’s invasion in Ukraine and conflict in the Middle East, continue to create a complex and challenging economic environment that could adversely affect investors’ and users’ perception of the economic outlook.

General economic conditions and declines in the demand for commercial real estate brokerage and the services we provide in several markets or in significant markets have led to, and could continue to lead to, material adverse effects on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects, including:

•a general decline in the acquisition and disposition of commercial real estate has led to, and could continue to lead to, a reduction in the commissions and fees we receive for arranging such transactions, as well as in commissions and fees we earn for arranging the financing for such transactions;

•a general decline in the value and performance of commercial real estate and in rental rates has led to, and could continue to lead to, a reduction in management and leasing commissions and fees. Additionally, such declines have led to, and could continue to lead to, a reduction in commissions and fees that are based on the value of, or revenue produced by, the properties for which we provide services. This may include commissions and fees for appraisal and valuation, sales and leasing, and property and facilities management;

•cyclicality in the commercial real estate markets may lead to volatility in our earnings, as the commercial real estate business can be highly sensitive to market perception of the economy generally and our industry specifically. Real estate markets are also thought to “lag” the broader economy. This means that even when underlying economic fundamentals improve in a given market, it may take additional time for these improvements to translate into strength in the commercial real estate markets;

•changes to the utilization of many types of commercial real estate, including the adoption of hybrid and remote work schemes, shifts in demand across geographical areas or from urban to suburban or rural sites, and changes in environmental regulations and costs associated with renovations and new builds each has led to, and could continue to lead to, reduced demand in areas in which we provide services, particularly for Class B and Class C office space;

•in weaker economic environments, income-producing multifamily real estate may experience higher property vacancies, lower investor and tenant demand and reduced values. In such environments, including the current environment, we have in the past experienced, and in the future we could experience, lower transaction volumes and transaction sizes as well as fewer loan originations with lower relative principal amounts, as well as potential credit losses arising from risk-sharing arrangements with respect to certain GSE and FHA loans;

•periods of economic weakness or recession, volatile interest rates, fiscal uncertainty, declining employment levels, declining demand for commercial real estate, falling real estate values, disruption to the global capital or credit markets, political uncertainty or the public perception that any of these events may occur, have negatively affected, and may continue to negatively affect, the performance of our business lines;

•changes to U.S. trade or immigration policy may have an adverse impact on the financial results of our clients, which could in turn adversely impact our business and our results of operations;

•our ability to raise funding in the long-term or short-term debt capital markets or the equity capital markets, or to access secured lending markets has been, and may be, adversely affected by conditions in the United States and international economy and markets, with the cost and availability of funding possibly adversely affected by illiquid credit markets and wider credit spreads, and changes in interest rates;

•pandemics and other international health emergencies have had and could have an adverse effect on our business and our results of operations and the usage of, demand for and valuation of commercial real estate generally; and

•disagreement over the federal budget has caused the U.S. federal government to shut down for periods of time in recent years, and there have recently been initiatives to reduce federal spending. Federal government entities, such as HUD, that rely on funding from the federal budget could be adversely affected in the event of a government shutdown or reduction in funding, which could have an adverse effect on our business and our results of operations.

Actions taken by central banks in major global economies, including with regards to interest rates, may have a material negative impact on our businesses.

Mortgage interest rates for commercial and multifamily properties had been near historic lows for a number of years leading up to 2022. In response to domestic and international markets experiencing significant inflationary pressures, the Federal Reserve in the U.S. and other central banks in various countries raised interest rates rapidly between the first quarter of 2022 and the fourth quarter of 2023. These actions reduced credit and capital availability, particularly in the second half of 2022 and in 2023. Less available and more expensive credit and capital has had pronounced effects on the commercial mortgage origination and investment sales markets in which we operate and could cause acquisitions and dispositions of commercial real estate to become yet more difficult to finance for our clients, in turn affecting our ability to service them.

Higher interest rates may cause commercial and multifamily capitalization rates to increase and property valuations to decline. This may reduce property owners’ equity and the amount of financing available to them. These factors, combined with record loan maturities in the near future, may cause significant distress for our owner and investor clients as they seek to refinance their debt or service their existing mortgages, in turn impacting our fees and business with them. Although we believe we may earn fees from increased sales of distressed properties or loans on such properties, and Newmark may be retained to manage properties acquired under distress, there can be no assurance that these incremental fees, if any, will offset any declines in other parts of our business as a result of higher interest rates, which in turn could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

In 2024, the Federal Reserve in the U.S. and other central banks began lowering interest rates. While the Federal Reserve has not indicated whether it will continue to lower interest rates or take other actions in 2025, it has stated that it continues to view inflation as a concern, which could lead the Federal Reserve and other central banks to hold interest rates steady or increase interest rates. The markets in which we operate may continue to experience reduced volumes and negative conditions until interest rates stabilize, and it may take longer for interest rates to stabilize than anticipated. Volatile changes in interest rates or other government actions taken by central banks could also result in recessionary pressures in many parts of the world, which may materially affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Downgrades of sovereign credit ratings, sovereign debt crises, or a decrease in the integrity of capital markets may have material adverse effects on the financial and commercial real estate markets and general economic conditions, as well as our businesses, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and prospects.

Any downgrades of the U.S. sovereign credit rating by one or more major credit rating agencies could have material adverse effects on the financial and commercial real estate markets and economic conditions in the U.S. and throughout the world. This in turn could have a material adverse impact on our businesses, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and prospects. The ultimate impacts of any negative credit rating actions with respect to U.S. government obligations on global financial markets and our businesses, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and prospects are unpredictable and may not be immediately apparent. Additionally, the negative impact on economic conditions and global financial markets from sovereign debt matters with respect to the U.K., the EU and/or its member states, Japan, China or other major economies could adversely affect our businesses, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and prospects. Concerns about the sovereign debt of certain major economies have caused uncertainty and disruption for financial markets globally, and continued uncertainties loom over the outcome of various governments’ financial support programs and the possibility that EU member states or other major economies may experience similar financial troubles. Any downgrades of the long-term sovereign credit rating of the U.S. or additional sovereign debt crises in major economies could cause disruption and volatility of financial markets globally and have material adverse effects on our businesses, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Risks Related to Concentration of our Business

Our business is generally geographically concentrated and could be significantly affected by any adverse change in the regions in which we operate.

Our current business operations are primarily located in the United States, with other business operations in the U.K., Latin America, Canada, the EU and Asia. Although we continue to expand our business outside the U.S., we are still highly concentrated in the United States. Because we derived the large majority of our total revenues on a consolidated basis for the year ended December 31, 2024 from our operations in the United States, we are particularly exposed to adverse competitive changes, economic downturns and changes in regulatory or political conditions domestically. If we are unable to identify and successfully manage or mitigate these risks, our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects could be materially adversely affected.

Concentration of business with particular institutional owners and corporate clients can increase risk, and our business can be adversely affected due to the loss of certain of these clients.

We value the expansion of business relationships with individual corporate clients because of the increased efficiency and economics that can result from developing recurring business from performing an increasingly broad range of services for the same client. Although our client portfolio is currently highly diversified for the year ended December 31, 2024, our top 10 clients, collectively, accounted for approximately 9.1% of our total revenue on a consolidated basis. As we grow our business, relationships with certain institutional owners and corporate clients may increase, and our client portfolio may become increasingly concentrated. Having increasingly large and concentrated clients also can lead to greater or more concentrated risks if, among other possibilities, any such client:

•experiences its own financial problems;

•becomes bankrupt or insolvent, which can lead to our failure to be paid for services we have previously provided or funds we have previously advanced;

•decides to reduce its operations or its real estate facilities;

•makes a change in its real estate strategy, such as no longer outsourcing its real estate operations;

•decides to change its providers of real estate services; or

•merges with another corporation or otherwise undergoes a change of control, which may result in new management taking over with a different real estate philosophy or in different relationships with other real estate providers.

Risks Related to the Commercial Real Estate Services Industry

We operate in a highly competitive industry with numerous competitors, some of which may have greater financial and operational resources than we do.

We compete to provide a variety of services within the commercial real estate industry. Each of these business disciplines is highly competitive on a local, regional, national and global level. We face competition not only from other national real estate service companies, but also from global real estate services companies, boutique real estate advisory firms, and consulting and appraisal firms. Depending on the product or service, we also face competition from other real estate service providers, institutional lenders, insurance companies, investment banking firms, commercial banks, investment managers and accounting firms, some of which may have greater financial resources than we do. Although many of our competitors are local or regional firms that are substantially smaller than we are, some of our competitors are substantially larger than us on a local, regional, national or international basis and have similar service competencies to ours. Such competitors include CBRE Group, Inc., Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated, Cushman & Wakefield plc, Savills plc., and Colliers International Group Inc. In addition, more specialized firms like Marcus & Millichap Inc., Eastdil Secured LLC, Walker & Dunlop, Inc., Berkadia Proprietary Holding LLC, Knight Frank LLP, NAI Global, and International Workplace Group PLC compete with us in certain service lines and/or geographies. Our industry has continued to consolidate, and there is an inherent risk that competitor firms may be more successful than we are at growing through merger and acquisition activity. See the heading “Competition” under Part I, Item 1, Business for more information. In general, there can be no assurance that we will be able to continue to compete effectively with respect to any of our commercial real estate business lines or on an overall basis, to maintain current commission and fee levels or margins, or to maintain or increase our market share.

Additionally, competitive conditions, particularly in connection with increasingly large clients, may require us to compromise on certain contract terms with respect to the extent of risk transfer, acting as principal rather than agent in connection with supplier relationships, liability limitations and other terms and conditions. Where competitive pressures result in higher levels of potential liability under our contracts, the cost of operational errors and other activities for which we have indemnified our clients will be greater and may not be fully insured.

Risks Related to New Opportunities/Possible Transactions and Hires

We may pursue opportunities including strategic alliances, acquisitions, dispositions, joint ventures or other growth opportunities (including hiring new brokers and other professionals), which could present unforeseen integration obstacles or costs and could dilute our stockholders. We may also face competition in our acquisition strategy, and such competition may limit such opportunities.

We have explored and continue to explore a wide range of acquisitions, dispositions, and joint ventures and strategic alliances with other real estate services firms, including maintaining or developing relationships with independently owned offices and other companies that have interests in businesses in which there are brokerage, management or other strategic opportunities. These arrangements may be terminable by either party or may be subject to amendment. Such transactions may be necessary for us to enter into or develop new products or services or markets, as well as to strengthen our current ones.

These opportunities and activities involve a number of risks and challenges, including:

•potential disruption of our ongoing business and product, service and market development and distraction of management;

•retaining and integrating personnel and integrating administrative, operational, financial reporting, internal control, compliance, technology and other systems;

•potentially hiring additional managers and other critical professionals and integrating them into current operations;

•increased scope, geographic diversity and complexity of our operations;

•to the extent that we pursue these opportunities internationally, exposure to political, economic, legal, regulatory, operational and other risks that are inherent in operating in a foreign country, including risks of possible nationalization and/or foreign ownership restrictions, expropriation, price controls, capital controls, foreign currency fluctuations, regulatory and tax requirements, economic and/or political instability, geographic, time zone, language and cultural differences among personnel in different areas of the world, exchange controls and other restrictive government actions, as well as the outbreak of hostilities;

•the expansion of our cybersecurity processes to include new businesses, or the integration of the cybersecurity processes of acquired businesses, including internationally;

•integrating accounting and financial systems and accounting policies and the related risk of having to restate our historical financial statements;

•potential dependence upon, and exposure to liability, loss or reputational damage relating to, systems, controls and personnel that are not under our control;

•addition of business lines in which we have not previously engaged and which we do not have experience operating;

•potential unfavorable reaction to our strategy by our customers, counterparties, employees and investors;

•the upfront costs associated with pursuing transactions and recruiting personnel, which efforts may be unsuccessful in the increasingly competitive marketplace for the most talented producers and managers;

•conflicts or disagreements with any strategic alliance or joint venture partner;

•exposure to potential unknown liabilities of any acquired business, strategic alliance or joint venture that are significantly larger than we anticipate at the time of acquisition, and unforeseen increased expenses or delays associated with acquisitions, including costs in excess of the costs that we estimate at the outset of a transaction;

•reduction in availability of financing due to credit ratings downgrades or defaults by us, in connection with these activities;

•a significant increase in the level of our indebtedness in order to generate cash resources that may be required to effect acquisitions;

•dilution resulting from any issuances of shares of our Class A common stock or limited partnership units in connection with these activities;

•a reduction of the diversification of our business resulting from any dispositions;

•replacing certain individuals whose services are lost and functions that are sold in dispositions;

•the cost of rebranding and the impact on our brand awareness of dispositions;

•the impact of any reduction in our asset base resulting from dispositions on our ability to obtain financing or the terms thereof;

•additional taxes or other fees or expenses associated with the risks described above; and

•a lag in the realization of financial benefits from these transactions and arrangements.

We face competition for acquisition targets, which may limit our number of acquisition and growth opportunities and may lead to higher acquisition prices or other less favorable terms. Our international acquisitions and expansion have required compliance and other regulatory actions. As we continue to grow internationally, we may experience additional expenses or obstacles. There can be no assurance that we will be able to identify, acquire or profitably manage additional businesses or integrate successfully any acquired businesses or new revenue-generating hires without substantial costs, delays or other operational or financial difficulties.

Any future growth will be partially dependent upon the continued availability of suitable transactional candidates at favorable prices and valuations and upon advantageous terms and conditions, which may not be available to us, as well as sufficient liquidity to fund these transactions. Future transactions and any necessary related financings also may involve significant transaction-related expenses, which include payment of break-up fees, assumption of liabilities, including compensation, severance, lease termination, and other restructuring costs, and transaction and deferred financing costs, among others. In addition, there can be no assurance that such transactions will be accretive or generate favorable operating margins. The success of these transactions will also be determined in part by the ongoing performance of the acquired companies and the acceptance of acquired employees of our equity-based compensation structure and other variables which may be different from the existing industry standards or practices at the acquired companies.

We will need to successfully manage the integration of recent and future acquisitions and future growth opportunities effectively. Such integration and additional growth may place a significant strain upon our management, administrative, operational, financial reporting, internal control and compliance infrastructure. Our ability to grow depends upon our ability to successfully hire, train, supervise and manage additional employees, expand our management, administrative, operational, financial reporting, compliance and other control systems effectively, allocate our human resources optimally, maintain clear lines of communication between our transactional and management functions and our finance and accounting functions, and manage the pressure on our management, administrative, operational, financial reporting, compliance and other control infrastructure. Additionally, managing future growth due to geographic locations, markets and business lines may be difficult. We may not realize, or it may take an extended period of time to realize, the full benefits that we anticipate from strategic alliances, mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures or other growth opportunities. There can be no assurance that we will be able to accurately anticipate and respond to the changing demands we will face as we integrate recent or future acquisitions and continue to expand our operations, and we may not be able to manage growth effectively or to achieve growth at all.

From time to time, we may also seek to dispose of portions of our business, or otherwise reduce our ownership or minority investments in other businesses, each of which could materially affect our cash flows and results of operations. Dispositions involve significant risks and uncertainties, such as the ability to sell such businesses at satisfactory prices and terms and in a timely manner (including long and costly sales processes and the possibility of lengthy and potentially unsuccessful attempts by a buyer to receive required regulatory approvals) or at all, disruption to other parts of the business and distraction of management, loss of key employees or customers, and exposure to unanticipated liabilities or ongoing obligations to support the businesses following such dispositions. In addition, if such dispositions are not completed for any reason, the market price of our Class A common stock may reflect a market assumption that such transactions will occur, and a failure to complete such transactions could result in a decline in the market price of our Class A common stock. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Risks Related to International Operations

We are and we will continue to be exposed to political, economic, legal, regulatory, operational and other risks, including with respect to the outbreak of hostilities or other instability, inherent in operating in foreign countries.

As we grow our business internationally, and due to our current international operations, we are and we will continue to be exposed to political, economic, legal, regulatory, operational and other risks that are inherent in operating in foreign countries. These include, among others, risks of restrictive government actions, such as possible nationalization and/or foreign ownership restrictions, expropriation, price controls, capital controls and exchange controls, risks related to the differences among our personnel in different areas of the world, such as geographic, time zone, language and cultural differences, foreign currency fluctuations, regulatory and tax requirements, and increased exposure to potential or actual drivers of economic and/or political instability, including, among others, economic volatility, political, trade and other tensions between the U.S. and China and other major powers, the outbreak of hostilities, such as the conflict between Ukraine and Russia and conflicts in the Middle East, and measures taken in response thereto, including sanctions imposed by governments and related counter-sanctions. We also face uncertain risks associated with potential changes in these factors as a result of the new presidential administration, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Our international activities are subject to a number of laws, including laws that prohibit corruption, anti-bribery laws, import and export control law, and economic and trade sanctions programs. We may not be successful in complying with these laws in all situations and violations may result in material monetary fines, penalties, and other costs or sanctions against us.

The U.K. exit from the EU could materially adversely impact our customers, counterparties, businesses, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

On January 31, 2020, the U.K. formally left the EU, and on January 1, 2021, U.K.-EU trade became subject to a new withdrawal agreement. The exit from the EU is commonly referred to as Brexit. In light of ongoing uncertainties, market participants are still adjusting. The long-term impact of Brexit on the U.K.-EU flow of services and on the economies of the U.K. and EU member states remains unknown.

Market access risks and uncertainties have had, and could continue to have, a material adverse effect on our customers, business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, as the U.K. and EU amend legislation and regulations post-Brexit, there is a risk of increased divergence between the U.K.’s and EU’s regulatory regimes, which could disrupt and increase the costs of our operations, and result in a loss of existing levels of cross-border market access.

Risks Related to Regulatory Compliance and Potential Liabilities

We may have liabilities in connection with our business activities, including appraisal and valuation, sales and leasing and property and facilities management activities, and such liabilities may exceed our insurance coverage.

As a licensed real estate broker and provider of commercial real estate services, we and our licensed sales professionals and independent contractors that work for us are subject to statutory due diligence, disclosure and standard-of-care obligations. While we believe we have adequate insurance coverage relative to the scale of our business, failure to fulfill these obligations could subject us or our sales professionals or independent contractors to litigation from parties who purchased, sold or leased properties that we brokered or managed.

We could become subject to claims by participants in real estate sales and leasing transactions, as well as building owners and companies for whom we provide management services, claiming that we did not fulfill our obligations. We could also become subject to claims made by clients for whom we provided appraisal and valuation services and/or third parties who perceive themselves as having been negatively affected by our appraisals and/or valuations. We also could be subject to audits and/or fines from various local real estate authorities if they determine that we are violating licensing laws by failing to follow certain laws, rules and regulations. While these liabilities have been insignificant in the past, we have no assurance that this will continue to be the case.

In our property and facilities management business, we hire and supervise third-party contractors to provide services for our managed properties. Depending upon (i) the terms of our contracts with clients, which, for example, may place us in the position of a principal rather than an agent, or (ii) the responsibilities we assume or are legally deemed to have assumed in the course of a client engagement (whether or not memorialized in a contract), we may be subject to claims for defects, negligent performance of work or other similar actions or omissions by third parties we do not control. Moreover, our clients may seek to hold us accountable for the actions of contractors because of our role as property or facilities manager or project manager, even if we have disclaimed liability as a contractual matter, in which case we may be pressured to participate in a financial settlement for purposes of preserving the client relationship. While these liabilities have been insignificant in the past, there is no assurance that this will continue to be the case.

Because we employ large numbers of building staff in facilities that we manage, we face risk in potential claims relating to employment injuries, termination and other employment matters. While these risks are generally passed back to the building owner, there is no assurance that this will continue to be the case.

Adverse outcomes of property and facilities management disputes or litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, particularly to the extent we may be liable on our contracts, or if our liabilities exceed the amounts of the insurance coverage procured and maintained by us. Some of these litigation risks may be mitigated by any commercial insurance we maintain in amounts we believe are appropriate. However, in the event of a substantial loss or certain types of claims, our insurance coverage and/or self-insurance reserve levels might not be sufficient to pay the full damages. Additionally, in the event of grossly negligent or intentionally wrongful conduct, insurance policies that we may have may not cover us at all. Further, the value of otherwise valid claims we hold under insurance policies could become uncollectible in the event of the covering insurance company’s insolvency, although we seek to limit this risk by placing our commercial insurance only with highly rated companies. Any of these events could materially negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. While these liabilities have been insignificant in the past, we have no assurance that this will continue to be the case.

If we fail to comply with laws, rules and regulations applicable to commercial real estate brokerage, valuation and advisory, mortgage transactions and our other business lines, we may incur significant financial penalties.

Due to the broad geographic scope of our operations and the commercial real estate services we perform, we are subject to numerous federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules and regulations specific to our services. For example, the brokerage of real estate sales and leasing transactions and other related activities require us to maintain brokerage licenses in each state in which we conduct activities for which a real estate license is required. We also maintain certain state licenses in connection with our lending, servicing and brokerage of commercial and multifamily mortgage loans. If we fail to maintain our licenses or conduct brokerage activities without a license or violate any of the laws, rules and regulations applicable to our licenses, then we may be subject to audits, required to pay fines (including treble damages in certain states), be prevented from collecting commissions owed, be compelled to return commissions received or have our licenses suspended or revoked.

In addition, because the size and scope of commercial real estate transactions have increased significantly during the past several years, both the difficulty of ensuring compliance with the numerous state licensing and regulatory regimes and the possible loss resulting from non-compliance have increased. Furthermore, the laws, rules and regulations applicable to our business lines also may change in ways that increase the costs of compliance. The failure to comply with federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules and regulations could result in significant financial penalties that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Changes in our tax rates, unavailability of certain tax credits or reliefs, exposure to additional tax liabilities or assessments or challenges to our tax positions or interpretations could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We are subject to tax risks inherent in operating a global business in various jurisdictions, including increased taxes and levies and future changes in income tax regulations. The authorities of countries in which we have offices or do business may from time-to-time institute changes to tax law that, if applicable to us, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Similarly, the current presidential administration has outlined a series of proposed changes to U.S. tax law, some of which could apply to us. It is not possible to predict if any of these new provisions will be enacted or, if they are, what form they may take. It is possible that one or more of such provisions could negatively impact our costs and our effective tax rate, which would affect our after-tax earnings. If any of such changes to tax law were implemented and/or deemed to apply to us, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, including on our ability to attract, compensate and retain brokers, salespeople, managers, technology professionals and other front-office personnel. Similarly, our tax positions and interpretations of the application of tax laws, including to our business and to our structure and those of our subsidiaries, have been challenged in the past and may be challenged in the future. If we are unable to successfully address any such challenge, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Environmental regulations may adversely impact our commercial real estate business and/or cause us to incur costs for cleanup of hazardous substances or wastes or other environmental liabilities.

Federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules and regulations impose various environmental zoning restrictions, use controls, and disclosure obligations which impact the management, development, use and/or sale of real estate. Such laws and regulations tend to discourage sales and leasing activities, as well as mortgage lending availability, with respect to some properties. A decrease or delay in such transactions may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, a failure by us to disclose environmental concerns in connection with a real estate transaction may subject us to liability to a buyer/seller or lessee/lessor of property. While historically we have not incurred any significant liability in connection with these types of environmental issues, there is no assurance that this will continue to be the case.

In addition, various laws, rules and regulations restrict the levels of certain substances that may be discharged into the environment by properties and such laws, rules and regulations may impose liability on current or previous real estate owners or operators for the cost of investigating, cleaning up or removing contamination caused by hazardous or toxic substances at the property. We may face costs or liabilities under these laws as a result of our role as an on-site property or facilities manager relating to properties we currently or formerly managed. Such liability may be imposed without regard to the lawfulness of the original disposal activity, or our knowledge of, or fault for, the release or contamination. Further, liability under some of these laws may be joint and several, meaning that one liable party could be held responsible for all costs related to a contaminated site. Insurance for such matters may not be available or sufficient. While historically we have not incurred any significant liability under these laws, and we believe that we have taken adequate measures to prevent any such losses, no assurances can be given that these events will not occur.

Certain requirements governing the removal or encapsulation of asbestos-containing materials, as well as local ordinances obligating property or facilities managers to inspect for and remove lead-based paint in certain buildings, could increase our costs of legal compliance and potentially subject us to violations or claims. More stringent enforcement of existing regulations could cause us to incur significant costs in the future, and/or materially and adversely impact our commercial real estate brokerage and management services business. While historically we have not incurred any significant liability under these laws, this may not always be the case.

Within our own operations, we may face rising costs of environmental compliance, which may make it more expensive to operate our corporate offices. Our operations are conducted within leased office building spaces, and, accordingly, we do not currently anticipate that regulations restricting the emissions of greenhouse gases, or taxes that may be imposed on their release, would result in material costs or capital expenditures. However, we cannot be certain about the extent to which such regulations will develop as there are higher levels of understanding and commitments by different governments in the United States and around the world regarding risks related to the climate and how they should be mitigated.

Risks Related to Our Mortgage Origination and Servicing Business

Changes in relationships with the GSEs and HUD could materially adversely affect our ability to originate and service multifamily real estate loans through such programs, although we also provide debt and equity to our clients through other third-party capital sources. Compliance with the minimum collateral and risk-sharing requirements of such programs, as well as applicable state and local licensing agencies, could reduce our liquidity.

Currently, through our capital markets business, we originate a significant percentage of our loans for sale through the GSE and HUD programs. Berkeley Point Capital LLC, a subsidiary within our capital markets business, is approved as a Fannie Mae DUS lender, a Freddie Mac Optigo seller/servicer, a Freddie Mac TAH Seller, a HUD MAP lender nationwide, and a Ginnie Mae issuer. Our status as an approved lender affords us a number of advantages, which may be terminated by the applicable GSE or HUD at any time. Although we intend to take all actions to remain in compliance with the requirements of these programs, as well as applicable state and local licensing agencies, the loss of such status would, or changes in our relationships with the GSEs and HUD could, prevent us from being able to originate commercial real estate loans for sale through the particular GSE or HUD, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. It could also result in a loss of similar approvals from the GSEs or HUD. As of December 31, 2024, we exceeded the most restrictive applicable net worth requirement of these programs by approximately $370.2 million, but there is no assurance that this will continue to be the case.

We are subject to risk of loss in connection with defaults on loans sold under the Fannie Mae DUS program that could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and liquidity.

Under the Fannie Mae DUS program, we originate and service multifamily loans for Fannie Mae without having to obtain Fannie Mae’s prior approval for certain loans, as long as the loans meet the underwriting guidelines set forth by Fannie Mae. In return for the delegated authority from Fannie Mae to make loans and Fannie Mae’s commitment to purchase such loans, we must maintain minimum collateral and generally are required to share risk of loss on loans sold through Fannie Mae. With respect to most loans, we are generally required to absorb approximately one-third of any losses on the unpaid principal balance of a loan at the time of loss settlement. Some of the loans that we originate under the Fannie Mae DUS program are subject to reduced levels or no risk-sharing. However, we generally receive lower servicing fees with respect to such loans. Although our average annual losses from such risk-sharing programs have been a minimal percentage of the aggregate principal amount of such loans to date, if loan defaults increase, actual risk-sharing obligation payments under the Fannie Mae DUS program could increase, and such defaults could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, a material failure to pay our share of losses under the Fannie Mae DUS program could result in the revocation of our license from Fannie Mae and the exercise of various remedies available to Fannie Mae under the Fannie Mae DUS program.

A change to the conservatorship of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and related actions, along with any changes in laws and regulations affecting the relationship between Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the U.S. federal government or the existence of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Each GSE has been under a conservatorship established by its regulator, the FHFA, since 2008. The conservatorship is a statutory process designed to preserve and conserve the GSEs’ assets and property and put them in a sound and solvent condition. The conservatorships have no specified termination dates. There has been significant uncertainty regarding the future of the GSEs, including how long they will continue to exist in their current forms. Changes in such forms could eliminate or substantially reduce the number of loans we originate with the GSEs. Policymakers and others have focused significant attention in recent years on how to reform the nation’s housing finance system, including what role, if any, the GSEs should play. Suggested reforms have included changes to the GSEs’ business charters, removing the GSEs from conservatorship, eliminating the entities entirely and other changes to the existing framework. Such reforms could significantly limit the role of the GSEs in the nation’s housing finance system and negatively impact transaction volume. Any such reduction in the loans we originate with the GSEs could lead to a reduction in fees related to the loans we originate or service. These effects could cause our capital markets business to realize significantly lower revenues from its loan originations and servicing fees, and ultimately could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. If the federal government were to reduce or eliminate programs that provide support for mortgage loans (including due to any failure of lawmakers to agree on a budget or appropriate legislation to fund relevant programs or operations or the privatization of certain existing government programs), we similarly could experience a reduction in fees related to the loans we originate or service with the GSEs, which could adversely affect our business.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights or may be prevented from using intellectual property necessary for our business.

Our success is dependent, in part, upon our intellectual property. We rely primarily on trade secret, contract, patent, copyright and trademark law in the United States and other jurisdictions as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to establish and protect our intellectual property rights to proprietary technologies, products, services or methods, and our brand.

Unauthorized use of our intellectual property could make it more expensive to do business and harm our operating results. We cannot ensure that our intellectual property rights are sufficient to protect our competitive advantages or that any particular patent, copyright or trademark is valid and enforceable, and all patents ultimately expire. We also cannot ensure that all intellectual property rights are registrable in the U.S. or elsewhere. In addition, the laws of some foreign jurisdictions may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws in the United States, or at all. We may also utilize third-party software licensed under “open source” licenses from time-to-time in connection with our business or product or service offerings. Although we have taken steps to protect ourselves, use of such third-party software may restrict how we use or distribute our products or services, subject us to claims, or impair our intellectual property rights. Any significant impairment of our intellectual property rights could harm our business or our ability to compete.

Although we have taken steps to protect ourselves, there can be no assurance that we will be aware of all patents, copyrights or trademarks that may pose a risk of infringement by our products and services. Generally, it is not economically practicable to determine in advance whether our products or services may infringe the present or future rights of others.

Accordingly, we may face claims of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights that could interfere with our ability to use intellectual property or technology that is material to our business. The number of such third-party claims may grow. Our technologies may not be able to withstand such third-party claims or rights against their use.

We may have to rely on litigation or other adversarial proceedings to secure, defend or enforce our intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets, determine the validity and scope of the rights of others or defend against claims of infringement or invalidity. Additionally, third parties may claim that we have infringed upon their intellectual property rights. Any such claims, proceedings or litigation, whether successful or unsuccessful, could result in substantial costs to us, and the diversion of resources and the attention of management, any of which could materially negatively affect our business. Such claims, proceedings or litigation could also require us to enter into settlement, royalty or licensing agreements (including with third parties claiming such infringement), stop selling or redesign affected products or services, rebrand or restrict our products or services, pay damages or satisfy indemnification commitments with our customers. Such settlement, royalty or licensing agreements, if any, may not be available on terms acceptable to us, and may negatively affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

If our software licenses or services from third parties are terminated or adversely changed or amended or contain material defects or errors, or if any of these third parties were to cease doing business, or if products or services offered by third parties that we rely upon were to contain material defects or errors, our ability to operate our business may be materially adversely affected.

We license databases, software and services from third parties, much of which is integral to our systems and our business. The licenses are terminable if we breach or have been perceived to have breached our obligations under the license agreements. If any material licenses were terminated or adversely changed or amended, if any of these third parties were to cease doing business or if any licensed software or databases licensed by these third parties were to contain material defects or errors, we may be forced to spend significant time and money to replace the licensed software and databases, and our ability to operate our business may be materially adversely affected. Further, any errors or defects in third-party services or products (including hardware, software, databases, cloud computing and other platforms and systems) or in services or products that we develop ourselves, could result in errors in, or a failure of, our services or products, which could harm our business. Although we take steps to locate replacements, there can be no assurance that the necessary replacements will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. There can be no assurance that we will have an ongoing license to use all intellectual property which our systems require, the failure of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Risks Related to Our IT Systems and Cybersecurity

Defects or disruptions in our technology or services could diminish demand for our products and services and subject us to liability.

Because our technology, products and services are complex and use or incorporate a variety of computer hardware, software and databases, both developed in-house and acquired from third-party vendors, our technology, products and services may have errors or defects. Errors and defects could result in unanticipated downtime or failure and could cause financial loss and harm to our reputation and our business. We have from time to time found defects and errors in our technology, products and service and defects and errors in our technology, products or services may be detected in the future. Our customers may use our technology, products and services in unanticipated ways that may cause a disruption for other customers. As we acquire companies, we may encounter difficulty in integrating the acquired technologies, products and services and maintaining the quality standards that are consistent with our technology, products and services. Since our customers use our technology, products and services for important aspects of their business, any errors, defects, or disruptions in such technology, products and services, or other performance problems with our technology, products and services, could subject our customers to harm and hurt our reputation.

Malicious cyber-attacks and other adverse events affecting our operational systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties, could disrupt our business, result in the disclosure of confidential information, damage our reputation and cause losses or regulatory penalties.

While we view cybersecurity as a top priority, developing and maintaining our operational systems and infrastructure is challenging, particularly as a result of rapidly evolving legal and regulatory requirements and technological shifts. Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information on our computer systems and networks. Although we take protective measures such as software programs, firewalls and similar technology, to maintain the confidentiality, integrity and availability of our and our clients’ information, and endeavor to modify these protective measures as circumstances warrant, the nature of cyber threats continues to evolve. As a result, our computer systems, software and networks may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, loss or destruction of data (including confidential client information), account takeovers, unavailability or disruption of service, computer viruses, acts of vandalism, or other malicious code, ransomware, supply-chain attacks, hacking, phishing and other cyber-attacks and other adverse events that could have an adverse security impact. Additionally, we may have become more vulnerable to cybersecurity attacks utilizing emerging technologies, such as AI. Despite the defensive measures we have taken, these threats may come from external forces such as governments, nation-state actors, organized crime, hackers, or may originate internally from within us.

We also face the risk of operational disruption, failure, termination or capacity constraints of any of the third parties that facilitate our business activities. Such parties could also be the source of a cyber-attack on or breach of our operational systems, network, data or infrastructure. Malicious actors may also attempt to compromise or induce our employees, clients or other users of our systems to disclose sensitive information or provide access to our data, and these types of risks may be difficult to detect or prevent.

Our financial, accounting, data processing or other operating and compliance systems and facilities may fail to operate properly or become disabled as a result of events that are wholly or partially beyond our control, such as a malicious cyber-attack or other adverse events, which may adversely affect our ability to provide services. Any such cyber incidents involving our computer systems and networks, or those of third parties important to our business, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

There have been an increasing number of ransomware, hacking, phishing and other cyber-attacks in recent years in various industries, and cybersecurity risk management has been the subject of increasing focus by our regulators. Like other companies, we have on occasion experienced, and may continue to experience, threats to our systems, including viruses, phishing and other cyber-attacks. The number and complexity of these threats continue to increase over time. The techniques used in these attacks are increasingly sophisticated, change frequently and are often not recognized until launched. If one or more cyber-attacks occur, it could potentially jeopardize the confidential, proprietary and other information processed and stored in, and transmitted through, our computer systems and networks, or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our, as well as our clients’ or other third parties’, operations, which could result in reputational damage, financial losses and/or client dissatisfaction, which may not in all cases be covered by insurance. If an actual, threatened or perceived cyber-attack or breach of our security occurs, our clients could lose confidence in our platforms and solutions, security measures and reliability, which would materially harm our ability to retain existing clients and gain new clients. As a result of any such attack or breach, we may be required to expend significant resources to repair system, network or infrastructure damage and to protect against the threat of future cyber-attacks or security breaches. We could also face litigation or other claims from impacted individuals as well as substantial regulatory sanctions or fines.

The extent of a particular cyber-attack and the steps that we may need to take to investigate the attack may not be immediately clear, and it may take a significant amount of time before such an investigation can be completed and full and reliable information about the attack is known. While such an investigation is ongoing, we may not necessarily know the full extent of the harm caused by the cyber-attack, and any resulting damage may continue to spread. Furthermore, it may not be clear how best to contain and remediate the harm caused by the cyber-attack, and certain errors or actions could be repeated or compounded before they are discovered and remediated. Any or all of these factors could further increase the costs and consequences of a cyber-attack. A technological breakdown could also interfere with our ability to comply with financial reporting requirements. Such a breakdown could also impact our ability to report on a timely basis due to the international locations of members of our accounting and finance departments.

Additionally, data privacy is subject to frequently changing rules and regulations in countries where we do business. Rights in relation to an individual’s personal data in the EU and U.K. are governed respectively by the GDPR in the EU and the equivalent Data Protection Act 2018 in the U.K. which create obligations in relation to such personal data and the possibility of significant financial penalties for non-compliance. We are also subject to certain U.S. federal and state laws governing the protection of personal data. These laws and regulations are increasing in complexity and number. In addition to the increased cost of compliance, our failure to successfully implement or comply with appropriate processes to adhere to the GDPR and other laws and regulations relating to personal data could result in substantial financial penalties for non-compliance, expose us to litigation risk and could harm our reputation.

We and our competitors may use AI in our businesses, and challenges with properly managing its use could result in competitive harm, regulatory action, legal liability and brand or reputational harm.

We may utilize AI in our business and integrate AI into our platforms, products, offerings and services. Such use may present legal, regulatory and other challenges that could subject us to competitive harm, regulatory action, legal liability and brand or reputational harm. Our efforts to utilize these technological advancements may not be successful, may result in substantial integration and maintenance costs, and may expose us to additional risks. If the output of any AI integrated into our platforms, products, offerings or services are or are alleged to be deficient, inaccurate, infringing, violative of third-party rights or biased, our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be adversely affected. The content, analyses, or recommendations generated by AI programs, if deficient, inaccurate, or biased, could adversely impact our business, financial condition, and operational results, as well as our reputation. Moreover, ethical concerns associated with AI could lead to brand damage, competitive disadvantages, or legal repercussions. Any problems with our implementation or use of AI or other technological advancements could negatively impact our business or results of our operations.

Our success and ability to remain competitive in the industry in which we operate requires adapting to technological developments and evolving industry standards, including in the field of AI. Our competitors or other third parties may incorporate AI into their products or services more quickly or more successfully than us, which could make our products and services obsolete, impair our ability to compete effectively and adversely affect our business. Moreover, use of third-party AI tools could lead to the inadvertent disclosure of confidential and proprietary information, which could put us at a competitive disadvantage and adversely affect our proprietary rights, business and financial condition and expose us to reputational harm and liability.

As AI capabilities improve and are increasingly adopted, we may also become more vulnerable to cybersecurity attacks that use AI. Such cybersecurity attacks could compromise our intellectual property and other sensitive information, be costly to remediate and cause significant damage to our business, reputation and operations. Our vendors and third-party partners may incorporate AI without disclosing this use to us, and the providers may not meet existing or rapidly evolving regulatory or industry standards with respect to privacy and data protection and may inhibit our or our vendors’ ability to maintain an adequate level of service and experience further exposing us to cybersecurity attacks and the loss of valuable property and information as well as adversely impact the public perception of the effectiveness of our security measures.

Risks Related to Our Key Personnel and Employee Turnover

Howard Lutnick’s confirmation as the U.S. Secretary of Commerce and the loss of his services could have an adverse effect on our business.

On February 18, 2025, Howard Lutnick was confirmed by the United States Senate as the 41st Secretary of Commerce. Following his confirmation, Howard Lutnick stepped down as our Executive Chairman of the Board, a position he has held since 2016, and our Board appointed our Chief Executive Officer, Barry Gosin, as our Principal Executive Officer.

We continue to have full confidence in Mr. Gosin, our long-term CEO and respected industry veteran and leader, as well as in the other executives and senior leaders of Newmark. However, the loss of Howard Lutnick as Executive Chairman, as well as his deep institutional knowledge and industry relationships, may be inherently difficult to manage and may hamper our ability to meet our financial and operational goals as we and our management adapt, particularly in the short term. The loss of

Mr. Lutnick’s services may also result in disruptions to our operations and impact our ability to execute on our current strategy and pursue new strategic initiatives, which in turn could have an adverse effect on our business.

The loss of key employees or the failure to hire and retain highly skilled and other key personnel could negatively affect our business.

Our people are our most important resource. We must retain the services of our key employees and strategically recruit and hire new talented employees to attract clients and transactions. Further, as we diversify into future business lines or geographic regions, hiring and engagement of effective management in these areas will impact our success. See “Human Capital Management” in Part I, Item 1, Business. If our retention efforts are not successful or our turnover rate increases in the future, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Our success has largely been led by key employees, such as Barry M. Gosin, who serves as our Chief Executive Officer, and other key officers and brokers, including some who have been hired from competitors or in connection with acquisitions. Although Mr. Gosin entered into an employment agreement in February 2023, as amended and restated in August 2024, if any of our key employees were to join an existing competitor, form a competing company, offer services to Cantor or any affiliates that compete with our products, services or otherwise leave us, some of our clients could choose to use the services of that competitor or another competitor instead of our services, which could adversely affect our revenues and as a result could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Effective succession planning is also important to our long-term success. Failure to smoothly navigate current and future transitions among our senior management or to effectively transfer knowledge to future executive officers and key employees could hinder our strategic planning and execution. From time to time, members of senior management, directors or other key employees may leave our Company or be absent due to illness or other factors. While we strive to retain our key employees and to reduce the negative impact of such changes when they occur, losing certain key employees could result in significant disruptions to our operations, adversely impact employee retention and morale, and seriously harm our business. Similarly, hiring, training, and successfully integrating replacements for critical personnel is time consuming and, if unsuccessful, could disrupt our operations, and as a result could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

The ability of key employees to devote adequate time and attention to us are a key part of the success of our business, and failure to continue to employ and have the benefit of these persons may adversely affect our business and prospects.

Certain officers and other key employees may have positions with and obligations to Cantor, BGC or their respective affiliates, and may dedicate only a portion of their professional efforts to our business and operations. There may be no contractual obligation for them to spend a specific amount of their time with us, BGC or Cantor or their respective affiliates.

For example, Mr. Merkel, the Chairman of our Board and our Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer, is employed as Executive Vice Chairman, Executive Managing Director, General Counsel and Secretary of Cantor and Executive Vice President and General Counsel of BGC well as a Director and Chairman of BGC’s board of directors. In addition, Mr. Merkel also holds offices at various other affiliates of Cantor. While we have entered into employment agreements with Mr. Gosin and Mr. Rispoli, and we have a change of control agreement with Mr. Merkel, Mr. Merkel is not subject to employment agreements with us or any of our subsidiaries.

In 2024, Mr. Merkel spent approximately 30% of his working time on our matters. Mr. Merkel expects to spend approximately 30% of his working time on our matters in 2025. This percentage may vary depending on business developments, strategic initiatives or acquisition activity at us or BGC or Cantor or any of our or their other affiliates, including SPACs.

Mr. Merkel or certain other of our officers or key employees who have positions with and obligations to other entities may not be able to dedicate adequate time and attention to our business and operations, may be subject to conflicts of interest with us due to their other positions and obligations, and we could experience an adverse effect on our operations due to the demands placed on these persons by their other professional obligations.

We may be unable to enforce post-employment restrictive covenants applicable to our employees.

Certain of our key employees and officers are subject to post-employment restrictive covenants, including non-competition agreements, in connection with their employment agreements and/or the Newmark Holdings limited partnership agreement. For instance, Mr. Gosin entered into an employment agreement in February 2023, as amended and restated in August 2024, and Mr. Rispoli entered into an employment agreement in September 2022, both of which contain certain non-compete provisions. If any of our key employees were to join an existing competitor, form a competing company, offer services to Cantor or any affiliates that compete with our products, services or otherwise leave us, some of our clients could choose to use the services of that competitor or another competitor instead of our services, which could adversely affect our revenues and as a result could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

While we have had success in responding to challenges to certain of our non-compete provisions, there can be no assurance that our non-competition agreements will be found enforceable if challenged in certain states, including states that generally do not enforce post-employment restrictive covenants. In 2024, the Federal Trade Commission enacted a rule, which is currently under legal challenge, that would render non-competition clauses unenforceable in certain situations. If such a rule is upheld (in any form) by the courts, it could have a material adverse impact on any applicable post-employment restrictive covenants currently in place.

Risks Related to Seasonality

Our business is generally affected by seasonality, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in a given period.

Due to the strong desire of many market participants to close real estate transactions prior to the end of a calendar year, our business exhibits certain seasonality, with our revenue tending to be lowest in the first quarter and strongest in the fourth quarter. This could have a material effect on our results of operations in any given period.

The seasonality of our business makes it difficult to determine during the course of the year whether planned results will be achieved and to adjust to changes in expectations. To the extent that we are not able to identify and adjust for changes in expectations or we are confronted with negative conditions that inordinately impact seasonal norms, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially adversely affected.

Risks Related to Our Commercial Contracts and Arrangements

We may not be able to replace partner offices when affiliation agreements are terminated, which may decrease our scope of services and geographic reach.

We have agreements in place to operate on a collaborative and cross-referral basis with certain offices in the United States and in various other locations globally in return for contractual and referral fees paid to us and/or certain mutually beneficial co-branding and other business arrangements. These independently owned offices, which we may refer to as “business partners,” generally use some variation of Newmark in their names and marketing materials. These agreements are normally multi-year contracts, and generally provide for mutual referrals in their respective markets, generating additional contract and brokerage fees. Through these business partners, our clients have access to additional brokers with local market research capabilities as well as other commercial real estate services in locations where we do not have a physical presence. From time to time our arrangements with these business partners may be terminated pursuant to the terms of the individual license agreements. The opening of a Company-owned office to replace an office owned by a business partner requires us to invest capital, which in some cases could be significant. Certain of these agreements or relationships could be impacted in the event that we rebrand or our brand awareness is changed. There can be no assurance that, if we lose additional business partners, we will be able to identify suitable replacement partners or fund the establishment or acquisition of an owned office. In addition, although we do not control the activities of these business partners and are not responsible for their liabilities, we may face reputational risk if any of these business partners are involved in or accused of illegal, unethical or similar behavior. Failure to maintain coverage in important geographic markets may negatively impact our operations, reputation and ability to attract and retain key employees and expand domestically and internationally and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Declines in or terminations of servicing engagements or breaches of servicing agreements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We expect that loan servicing fees will continue to constitute a significant portion of our revenues and/or earnings related to our multifamily business for the foreseeable future. A large majority of our fees with respect to servicing and asset management are derived from loans that we originate and that are sold through GSE/FHA programs or placed with institutional investors. A decline in the number or value of loans, due to reductions in the total volumes of loans through GSE/FHA programs or otherwise, that we originate for these investors or terminations of our servicing engagements will decrease these fees. HUD has the right to terminate our capital markets business’ current servicing engagements for cause. In addition to termination for cause, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac may terminate our servicing engagements without cause by paying a termination fee. Institutional investors typically may terminate servicing engagements with us at any time with or without cause, without paying a termination fee. We are also subject to losses that may arise from servicing errors, such as a failure to maintain insurance, pay taxes, or provide notices. If we breach our servicing obligations to the agencies or institutional investors, including as a result of a failure to perform by any third parties to which we have contracted certain routine back-office aspects of loan servicing, the servicing engagements may be terminated. Significant declines or terminations of servicing engagements or breaches of such obligations, in the absence of replacement revenue sources, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Reductions in loan servicing fees as a result of defaults or prepayments by borrowers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

In addition to exposure to potential loss sharing, our loan servicing business is also subject to potential reductions in loan servicing fees if the borrower defaults on or prepays a loan originated thereby, as the generation of loan servicing fees depends upon the continued receipt and processing of periodic installments of principal, interest and other payments such as amounts held in escrow to pay property taxes and other required expenses. The loss of such loan servicing fees would reduce the amount of cash actually generated from loan servicing and from interest on amounts held in escrow. The expected loss of future loan servicing fees would also result in non-cash impairment charges to earnings. Such cash and non-cash charges could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Risks Related to Liquidity, Funding and Indebtedness

Liquidity is essential to our business, and insufficient liquidity could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Liquidity is essential to our business. Our liquidity position could be impaired due to circumstances that we may be unable to control, such as a general market disruption or idiosyncratic events that affect our clients, other third parties or us.

We are a holding company with no direct operations. We conduct substantially all of our operations through our operating subsidiaries. We do not have any material assets other than our direct and indirect ownership in the equity of our subsidiaries. As a result, our operating cash flow as well as our liquidity position are dependent upon the earnings of our subsidiaries. In addition, we are dependent on the distribution of earnings, loans or other payments by our subsidiaries to us. In the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or similar proceeding with respect to any of our subsidiaries, we, as an equity owner of such subsidiary, and therefore holders of our securities, including our Class A common stock, will be subject to the prior claims of such subsidiary’s creditors, including trade creditors, and any preferred equity holders. Any dividends declared by us, any payment by us of our indebtedness or other expenses, and all applicable taxes payable in respect of our net taxable income, if any, are paid from cash on hand and funds received from distributions, loans or other payments, primarily from our subsidiaries. Regulatory, tax restrictions or elections, and other legal or contractual restrictions may limit our ability to transfer funds freely from our subsidiaries. These laws, regulations and rules may hinder our ability to access funds that we may need to meet our obligations. Certain debt and security agreements entered into by our subsidiaries contain or may contain various restrictions, including restrictions on payments by our subsidiaries to us and the transfer by our subsidiaries of assets pledged as collateral. To the extent that we need funds to pay dividends and repurchase shares or purchase limited partnership units, repay indebtedness and meet other expenses, or to pay taxes on our share of Newmark OpCo’s net taxable income, and Newmark OpCo or its subsidiaries are restricted from making such distributions under applicable law, regulations, or agreements, or are otherwise unable to provide such funds, it could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects, including our ability to maintain adequate liquidity or to raise additional funding, including through access to the debt and equity capital markets.

Our ability to raise funding in the long-term or short-term debt capital markets or the equity capital markets, or to access lending markets could be adversely affected by conditions in the United States and international economy and markets, or idiosyncratic events, with the cost and availability of funding adversely affected by wider credit spreads, changes in interest rates and dislocations in capital markets, as well as various business, governance, tax, accounting and other considerations. To the extent we are unable to access the debt capital markets on acceptable terms in the future, we may seek to raise funding and capital through equity issuances or other means.

Turbulence in the U.S. and international economy or markets adversely affects our liquidity and funding positions, financial condition and the willingness of certain clients to do business with each other or with us. Acquisitions and financial reporting obligations related thereto may impact our ability to access the capital markets on a timely basis, or at all, and may necessitate greater short-term borrowings during certain times, which in turn may adversely affect our cost of borrowing, financial condition, and creditworthiness, and as a result, potentially impact our credit ratings and associated outlooks.

We may need to access short-term funding sources in order to meet a variety of business needs from time to time, including financing acquisitions, as well as ongoing business operations or activities such as hiring or retaining real estate brokers, salespeople, managers and other professionals. While we have credit facilities in place, to the extent that our capital or other needs exceed the capacity of our existing funding sources or we are not able to access any of these sources, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

As of December 31, 2024, our GSE business had $1.5 billion of committed loan funding and $1.1 billion of uncommitted loan funding available through multiple commercial banks, and an uncommitted $500 million Fannie Mae loan repurchase facility. Consistent with industry practice, our capital markets business’ existing warehouse facilities are short-term, requiring annual renewal. If any of the committed facilities are terminated or are not renewed or the uncommitted facility is not honored, we would be required to obtain replacement financing, which we may be unable to find on favorable terms, or at all, and, in such event, we might not be able to originate loans, which could have a material adverse effect on MSRs and on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We are subject to the risk of failed loan deliveries, and even after a successful closing and delivery, may be required to repurchase the loan or to indemnify the investor if there is a breach of a representation or warranty made by us in connection with the sale of loans, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We bear the risk that a borrower will not close on a loan that has been pre-sold to an investor and the amount of such borrower’s rate lock deposit and any amounts recoverable from such borrower for breach of its obligations are insufficient to cover the investor’s losses. In addition, the investor may choose not to take delivery of the loan if a catastrophic change in the condition of a property occurs after we fund the loan and prior to the investor purchase date. We also have the risk of errors in loan documentation which prevent timely delivery of the loan prior to the investor purchase date. A complete failure to deliver a loan could be a default under the warehouse facilities collateralized by GSEs used to finance the loan. While we have not experienced failed deliveries in the past, no assurance can be given that we will not experience failed deliveries in the future or that any losses will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

We must make certain representations and warranties concerning each loan we originate for the GSEs’ and HUD’s programs or securitizations. The representations and warranties relate to our practices in the origination and servicing of the loans and the accuracy of the information being provided by them. In the event of a material breach of representations or warranties concerning a loan, even if the loan is not in default, investors could, among other things, require us to repurchase the full amount of the loan and seek indemnification for losses from it, or, for Fannie Mae DUS loans, increase the level of risk-sharing on the loan. Our obligation to repurchase the loan is independent of our risk-sharing obligations. Our ability to recover on a claim against the borrower or any other party may be contractually limited and would also be dependent, in part, upon the financial condition and liquidity of such party. Although these obligations have not had a significant impact on our results to date, significant repurchase or indemnification obligations imposed on us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We have debt, which could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations and activities, limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or the commercial real estate services industry, expose us to interest rate risk, impact our ability to obtain favorable credit ratings and prevent us from meeting or refinancing our obligations under our indebtedness, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our indebtedness, which on March 3, 2025 was approximately $735 million (exclusive of indebtedness on our warehouse facilities), may have important, adverse consequences to us and our investors, including:

•it may limit our ability to borrow money, dispose of assets or sell equity to fund our working capital, capital expenditures, dividend payments, debt service, strategic initiatives or other obligations or purposes;

•it may limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in the economy, the markets, regulatory requirements, our operations or business;

•our financial leverage may be higher than some of our competitors, which may place us at a competitive disadvantage;

•it may make us more vulnerable to downturns in the economy or our business;

•it may require a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to make interest payments;

•it may make it more difficult for us to satisfy other obligations;

•it may increase the risk of a future downgrade of our credit ratings or otherwise impact our ability to obtain or maintain investment grade credit ratings, which could increase the interest rates under certain of our debt agreements, increase future debt costs and limit the future availability of debt financing;

•we may not be able to borrow additional funds or refinance existing debt as needed or take advantage of business opportunities as they arise, pay cash dividends, repurchase common stock or purchase limited partnership units; and

•there would be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects if we are unable to service our indebtedness or obtain additional financing or refinance our existing debt on terms acceptable to us.

The $735 million of indebtedness excludes the warehouse facilities collateralized by GSEs because these lines are used to fund short-term loans held for sale that are generally sold within 45 days from the date the loan is funded. All of the loans held for sale are either under commitment to be purchased by Freddie Mac or have confirmed forward trade commitments for the issuance and purchase of Fannie Mae or Ginnie Mae mortgage-backed securities that will be secured by the underlying loans.

Some of our borrowings have variable interest rates. As a result, increases in market interest rates have had and may continue to have a material adverse effect on our interest expense. Prolonged high or rising interest rates could further increase our cost of funds, which could reduce our net income. In an effort to limit our exposure to interest rate fluctuations, we may rely on interest rate hedging or other interest rate risk management activities. These activities may limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the hedged borrowings. Adverse developments resulting from changes in interest rates or hedging transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our ability to meet our payment and other obligations related to our debt depends on our ability to refinance such debt, borrow funds from our credit facilities and to generate and maintain sufficient cash flows. To the extent that we incur additional indebtedness or seek to refinance our existing debt, the risks described above could increase. In addition, our actual cash requirements in the future may be greater than expected. We cannot assure you that our business will generate cash flow from operations, or that additional capital will be available to us, in an amount sufficient to enable us to meet our payment obligations under our borrowings and to fund other liquidity needs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We may incur substantially more debt or take other actions which would intensify the risks discussed herein.

We may incur substantial additional debt in the future, some of which may be secured debt. Under the terms of our existing debt, we are permitted under certain circumstances to incur additional debt, grant liens on our assets to secure existing or future debt, recapitalize our debt or take a number of other actions that could have the effect of diminishing our ability to make payments on our debt when due. To the extent that we borrow additional funds, the terms of such borrowings may include higher interest rates, more stringent financial covenants, change of control provisions, make-whole provisions or other terms that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Credit ratings downgrades could adversely affect our cost of capital and the availability of debt financing.

Our credit ratings and associated outlooks are critical to our reputation and operational and financial success. Our credit ratings and associated outlooks are influenced by a number of factors, including: operating environment, regulatory environment, earnings and profitability trends, the rating agencies’ view of our funding and liquidity management practices, balance sheet size/composition and resulting leverage, cash flow coverage of interest, composition and size of the capital base, available liquidity, outstanding borrowing levels, our competitive position in the industry, our relationships in the industry, our relationship with Cantor, acquisitions or dispositions of assets and other matters. A credit rating and/or the associated outlook can be revised upward or downward at any time by a rating agency if such rating agency decides that circumstances of that company or related companies warrant such a change. Any adverse ratings change or a downgrade in the credit ratings of

Newmark, Cantor or any of their other affiliates, and/or the associated ratings outlooks could adversely affect the availability of debt financing to us on acceptable terms, as well as the cost and other terms upon which we may obtain any such financing. In addition, our credit ratings and associated outlooks may be important to clients of ours in certain markets and in certain transactions. A company’s contractual counterparties may, in certain circumstances, demand collateral in the event of a credit ratings or outlook downgrade of that company. Further, interest rates payable on our future or currently outstanding debt may increase in the event that our ratings get downgraded; for example, under the terms of our 7.500% Senior Notes, a downgrade in our credit ratings by Fitch Ratings Inc. or Standard & Poor’s would lead to an increase in the interest rate payable on those notes.

As of December 31, 2024, our long-term credit ratings from Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. are BBB+ with a stable outlook, and from both Fitch Ratings Inc. and Kroll Bond Rating Agency are BBB-, and the associated outlooks are stable. Our long-term credit rating from Standard & Poor’s is BB+ with an associated outlook of stable. No assurance can be given that our credit ratings and associated outlooks will remain unchanged in the future.

Our acquisitions may require significant cash resources and may lead to a significant increase in the level of our indebtedness.

Future acquisitions may require significant cash resources and lead to a significant increase in the level of our indebtedness. We may enter into short- or long-term financing arrangements in connection with acquisitions which may occur from time to time. In addition, we may incur substantial nonrecurring transaction costs, including break-up fees, assumption of liabilities and expenses and compensation expenses. The increased level of our consolidated indebtedness in connection with potential acquisitions may restrict our ability to raise additional funding or capital on favorable terms, and such leverage, and any resulting liquidity or credit issues, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Risks Related to Our 7.500% Senior Notes

We may not have the funds necessary to repurchase the 7.500% Senior Notes upon a change of control triggering event as required by the indenture governing these notes.

Upon the occurrence of a “change of control triggering event” (as defined in in the indenture governing the 7.500% Senior Notes) unless we have exercised our right to redeem the notes, holders of the notes will have the right to require us to repurchase all or any part of their notes at a price in cash equal to 101% of the then-outstanding aggregate principal amount of the notes repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. If we experience a “change of control triggering event,” we can offer no assurance that we would have sufficient, financial resources readily available to satisfy our obligations to repurchase any or all of the notes should any holder elect to cause us to do so. Our failure to repurchase the notes as required would result in a default under the indenture, which in turn could result in defaults under agreements governing certain of our other indebtedness, including the acceleration of the payment of any borrowings thereunder, and which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

The requirement to offer to repurchase the 7.500% Senior Notes upon a change of control triggering event may delay or prevent an otherwise beneficial takeover attempt of us.

The requirement to offer to repurchase the 7.500% Senior Notes upon a change of control triggering event may in certain circumstances delay or prevent a takeover of us and/or the removal of incumbent management that might otherwise be beneficial to investors in our Class A common stock.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR CORPORATE AND PARTNERSHIP AND EQUITY STRUCTURE

We are a holding company and accordingly are dependent upon distributions from Newmark OpCo to pay dividends, taxes and indebtedness and other expenses and to make repurchases of our Class A common stock.

We are a holding company with no direct operations, and we will be able to pay dividends, taxes and other expenses, and to make repurchases of shares of our Class A common stock and purchases of Newmark Holdings limited partnership interests or other equity interests in our subsidiaries, only from our available cash on hand and funds received from distributions, loans or other payments, primarily from Newmark OpCo. Tax restrictions or elections and other legal or contractual restrictions may limit our ability to transfer funds freely from our subsidiaries. In addition, any unanticipated accounting, tax or other charges against net income could adversely affect our ability to pay dividends and to make repurchases.

On November 4, 2024, our Board of Directors and Audit Committee authorized repurchases of shares of our Class A common stock and purchases of limited partnership interests or other equity interests in our subsidiaries up to an aggregate of $400.0 million. See “Stock and Unit Repurchase and Redemption Program and 2024 Activity” in Part II, Item 5, Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. This authorization includes repurchases of stock or purchases of units from executive officers, other employees and partners, including Cantor, as well as other affiliated persons or entities. From time to time, we may repurchase shares or purchase units. See “—Risks Related to Our Business—Risks Related to Liquidity, Funding and Indebtedness— Liquidity is essential to our business, and insufficient liquidity could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.”

Reductions in our quarterly cash dividend and reductions in distributions by Newmark Holdings to its partners may reduce the value of our common stock. There can be no assurance that future dividends will be paid, that dividend amounts will be maintained or that repurchases or purchases will be made at current or future levels.

On February 13, 2025 our Board declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.03 per share payable on March 17, 2025 to Class A and Class B common stockholders of record as of March 3, 2025. Investors seeking a high short-term dividend yield may find our Class A common stock less attractive than securities of issuers with higher dividend yields.

Our ability to pay dividends is dependent upon our available cash on hand and funds received from distributions, loans or other payments from Newmark OpCo. Newmark OpCo intends to distribute to its limited partners, including us, on a pro rata and quarterly basis, cash in an amount that will be determined by Newmark Holdings, its general partner, the entity of which we are the general partner of. Newmark OpCo’s ability, and in turn our ability, to make such distributions will depend upon the continuing profitability and strategic and operating needs of our business. We may not pay the same dividend to our shares as the distribution paid by Newmark OpCo to its limited partners.

We have flexibility in how we deploy our capital. As noted above, in November 2024, our Board of Directors reauthorized our stock repurchase and unit purchase authorization to an aggregate of $400 million, which repurchases and purchases we may make from time to time. In addition, from time to time, we may reinvest all or a portion of the distributions we receive in Newmark OpCo’s business. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that future dividends will be paid, that dividend amounts will be maintained or that repurchases or purchases will be made at current or future levels. See “Capital Deployment Priorities, Dividend Policy and Repurchase and Redemption Program” in Part II, Item 5, Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Because our voting control is concentrated among the holders of our Class B common stock, the market price of our Class A common stock may be materially adversely affected by its disparate voting rights.

The holders of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock have substantially identical economic rights, but their voting rights are different. Holders of Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per share, while holders of Class B common stock are entitled to 10 votes per share on all matters to be voted on by stockholders in general.

Our Class B common stock is controlled by Cantor and will not be subject to conversion or redemption by us. Our Certificate of Incorporation does not provide for automatic conversion of shares of Class B common stock into shares of Class A common stock upon the occurrence of any event. Furthermore, the Class B common stock is only issuable to Cantor, members of the Lutnick family or certain persons or entities controlled by them. The difference in the voting rights of our Class B common stock could adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock.

As long as Cantor beneficially owns a majority of our total voting power, it will have the ability, without the consent of the other holders of our Class A common stock, to elect all of the members of our Board of Directors and to control our management and affairs. In addition, it will be able to determine the outcome of matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders for approval and will be able to cause or prevent a change of control of us.

The dual class structure of our common stock may adversely affect the trading market for our Class A common stock.

S&P Dow Jones Indices and FTSE Russell have previously excluded companies with multiple classes of shares of common stock from being added to their indices or limited their inclusion in them. In addition, several shareholder advisory firms have announced their opposition to the use of multiple class structures. It is possible that the dual class structure of our common stock may prevent the inclusion of our Class A common stock in such indices and may cause shareholder advisory firms to publish negative commentary about our corporate governance practices or otherwise seek to cause us to change our capital structure. Any such exclusion from indices could result in a less active trading market for our Class A common stock. Any actions or publications by shareholder advisory firms critical of our corporate governance practices or capital structure could also adversely affect the value of our Class A common stock.

Delaware law may protect decisions of our Board of Directors that have a different effect on holders of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock.

Stockholders may not be able to challenge decisions that have an adverse effect upon holders of our Class A common stock compared to holders of our Class B common stock if our Board of Directors acts in a disinterested, informed manner with respect to these decisions, in good faith and in the belief that it is acting in the best interests of our stockholders. Delaware law generally provides that a Board of Directors owes an equal duty to all stockholders, regardless of class or series, and does not have separate or additional duties to different groups of stockholders, subject to applicable provisions set forth in a corporation’s certificate of incorporation and general principles of corporate law and fiduciary duties.

If we or Newmark Holdings were deemed an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act, the Investment Company Act’s restrictions could make it impractical for us to continue our business and structure as contemplated and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Generally, an entity is deemed an “investment company” under Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act if it is primarily engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities, and is deemed an “investment company” under Section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act if it owns “investment securities” having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. We believe that neither we nor Newmark Holdings should be deemed an “investment company” as defined under Section 3(a)(1)(A) because neither of us is primarily engaged in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities. Rather, through our operating subsidiaries, we and Newmark Holdings are primarily engaged in the operation of various types of commercial real estate services businesses as described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Neither we nor Newmark Holdings is an “investment company” under Section 3(a)(1)(C) because more than 60% of the value of our total assets on an unconsolidated basis are interests in majority-owned subsidiaries that are not themselves “investment companies.” In particular, Berkeley Point, a significant majority-owned subsidiary, is entitled to rely on, among other things, the mortgage banker exemption in Section 3(c)(5)(C) of the Investment Company Act.

To ensure that we and Newmark Holdings are not deemed “investment companies” under the Investment Company Act, we need to be primarily engaged, directly or indirectly, in the non-investment company businesses of our operating subsidiaries. If we were to cease participation in the management of Newmark Holdings, if Newmark Holdings, in turn, were to cease participation in the management of Newmark OpCo, or if Newmark OpCo, in turn, were to cease participation in the management of our operating subsidiaries, that would increase the possibility that we and Newmark Holdings could be deemed “investment companies.” Further, if we were deemed not to have a majority of the voting power of Newmark Holdings (including through our ownership of the Special Voting Limited Partnership Interest), if Newmark Holdings, in turn, were deemed not to have a majority of the voting power of Newmark OpCo (including through its ownership of the Special Voting Limited Partnership Interest), or if Newmark OpCo, in turn, were deemed not to have a majority of the voting power of our operating subsidiaries, that would increase the possibility that we and Newmark Holdings could be deemed “investment companies.” Finally, if any of our operating subsidiaries were deemed “investment companies,” our interests in Newmark Holdings and Newmark OpCo, and Newmark Holdings’ interests in Newmark OpCo, could be deemed “investment securities,” and we and Newmark Holdings could be deemed “investment companies.”

We expect to take all legally permissible action to ensure that we and Newmark Holdings are not deemed investment companies under the Investment Company Act, but no assurance can be given that this will not occur.

The Investment Company Act and the rules thereunder contain detailed prescriptions for the organization and operations of investment companies. Among other things, the Investment Company Act and the rules thereunder limit or prohibit transactions with affiliates, limit the issuance of debt and equity securities, prohibit the issuance of stock options and impose certain governance requirements. If anything were to happen that would cause us or Newmark Holdings to be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, the Investment Company Act would limit our or its capital structure, ability to transact business with affiliates (including Cantor, Newmark Holdings or Newmark OpCo, as the case may be) and ability to compensate key employees. Therefore, if we or Newmark Holdings became subject to the Investment Company Act, it could make it impractical to continue our business in this structure, impair agreements and arrangements and impair the transactions contemplated by those agreements and arrangements, between and among us, Newmark Holdings and

Newmark OpCo, or any combination thereof, and materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We may be required to pay Cantor for a significant portion of the tax benefit, if any, relating to any additional tax depreciation or amortization deductions we claim as a result of any step up in the tax basis of the assets of Newmark OpCo resulting from exchanges of interests held by Cantor in Newmark Holdings for our common stock.

Certain partnership interests in Newmark Holdings may be exchanged for shares of Newmark common stock. In the vast majority of cases, the partnership units that become exchangeable for shares of Newmark common stock are units that have been granted as compensation, and, therefore, the exchange of such units will not result in an increase in Newmark’s share of the tax basis of the tangible and intangible assets of Newmark OpCo. However, exchanges of other partnership units—including non-tax-free exchanges of units by Cantor—could result in an increase in the tax basis of such tangible and intangible assets that otherwise would not have been available, although the Internal Revenue Service may challenge all or part of that tax basis increase, and a court could sustain such a challenge by the Internal Revenue Service. These increases in tax basis, if sustained, may reduce the amount of tax that Newmark would otherwise be required to pay in the future. In such circumstances, the tax receivable agreement that Newmark entered into with Cantor provides for the payment by Newmark to Cantor of 85% of the amount of cash savings, if any, in the U.S. federal, state and local income tax or franchise tax that Newmark actually realizes as a result of these increases in tax basis and certain other tax benefits related to its entering into the tax receivable agreement, including tax benefits attributable to payments under the tax receivable agreement. It is expected that Newmark will benefit from the remaining 15% cash savings, if any, in income tax that we realize.

Risks Related to Our Relationship with Cantor and its Affiliates

In connection with his confirmation as the 41 st Secretary of Commerce, Mr. Howard Lutnick has stated his intention to divest his interests in our company, Cantor and CFGM to comply with U.S. government ethics rules. We cannot predict the consequences of this divestiture.

In addition to the risks described under “—Risks Relating to Our Key Personnel and Employee Turnover,” there are various risks associated with Howard Lutnick’s intended upcoming divestment of his interests in our company, Cantor and CFGM. The consequences of these divestments will depend upon the manner in which they are accomplished, and we do not currently expect such divestments to trigger “change of control” provisions under any material agreements. That expectation may change and it may be difficult to predict the full consequences of such divestments, and there can be no assurance that these divestments will not trigger such “change of control” provisions.

Our Class B common stock is held by Cantor and CFGM, whose interests may conflict with ours and may exercise their control in a way that favors their interests to our detriment.

Since our inception, we have been controlled directly by Cantor, and indirectly by Howard Lutnick through his control of Cantor. Cantor exercises control over our management and affairs and all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of our directors and determinations with respect to acquisitions and dispositions, as well as material expansions or contractions of our business, entry into new lines of business and borrowings and issuances of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock or other securities. This control is subject to the approval of our Audit Committee on those matters requiring such approval. Cantor’s voting power may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control of us.

Further changes in Cantor’s management may occur pursuant to Mr. Howard Lutnick’s divestiture of his interests, which may impact Cantor’s control over and relationship with us in ways that we cannot currently predict.

As of December 31, 2024, Cantor and CFGM held no shares of our Class A common stock. As of December 31, 2024, Cantor and CFGM held 21,285,533 shares of our Class B common stock, which represented all of the outstanding shares of our Class B common stock. The shares of Class B common stock held by Cantor and CFGM as of December 31, 2024 represented approximately 58.7% of our total voting power. As of December 31, 2024, Cantor and CFGM also owned 27,570,090 exchangeable limited partnership units of Newmark Holdings. If Cantor and CFGM were to exchange such units into shares of our Class B common stock, Cantor would have approximately 76.6% of our total voting power as of December 31, 2024 (61.7% if Cantor were to exchange such units into shares of our Class A common stock). We expect to retain our dual class structure, and there are no circumstances under which the holders of Class B common stock would be required to convert their shares of Class B common stock into shares of Class A common stock. Additionally, on February 18, 2025, Mr. Brandon Lutnick was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Cantor and Chief Executive Officer of CFGM, and Mr.

Kyle Lutnick was appointed as Executive Vice Chairman of Cantor and President of CFGM, and as a member of our Board of Directors.

Cantor’s and/or members of the Lutnick family’s ability to exercise control over us could create or appear to create potential conflicts of interest. Conflicts of interest may arise between us and Cantor in a number of areas relating to our past and ongoing relationships, including:

•potential acquisitions and dispositions of businesses, mergers, joint ventures, investments or similar transactions;

•the issuance, acquisition or disposition of securities by us;

•the election of new or additional directors to our Board of Directors;

•the payment of dividends by us (if any), distribution of profits by Newmark OpCo and/or Newmark Holdings and repurchases of shares of our Class A common stock or purchases of Newmark Holdings limited partnership interests or other equity interests in our subsidiaries, including from Cantor or our executive officers, other employees, partners and others;

•any loans to or from us or Cantor, or any financings or credit arrangements that relate to or depend on our relationship with Cantor or its relationship with us;

•business operations or business opportunities of ours and Cantor’s that would compete with the other party’s business opportunities;

•intellectual property matters;

•business combinations involving us;

•the nature, quality and pricing of administrative services and transition services to be provided to or by Cantor or its affiliates; and

•any positions by members of the Lutnick family with us and our affiliates, BGC Group and/or Cantor and their ownership of any such equity or the equity of any of Cantor’s other affiliates.

Potential conflicts of interest could also arise if we decide to enter into any new commercial arrangements with Cantor in the future or in connection with Cantor’s desire to enter into new commercial arrangements with third parties. Further, potential allegations of conflicts or reputational impacts could occur, which may have an adverse effect on our business. Members of the Lutnick family have been, and may be, periodically employed by and/or involved in the management of our and our affiliate’s businesses.

We expect Cantor to manage its continued ownership of us so that it will not be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, including by maintaining its voting power in us above a majority absent an applicable exemption from the Investment Company Act. This may result in conflicts with us, including those relating to acquisitions or offerings by us involving issuances of shares of our Class A common stock, or securities convertible or exchangeable into shares of our Class A common stock, which would dilute Cantor’s voting power in us. See “—Risks Related to Our Corporate and Partnership and Equity Structure—If we or Newmark Holdings were deemed an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act, the Investment Company Act’s restrictions could make it impractical for us to continue our business and structure as contemplated and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.”

In addition, Cantor has from time to time in the past and may in the future consider possible strategic realignments of its own business and/or of the relationships that exist between and among Cantor and its other affiliates and us. Any related-party transaction or arrangement between Cantor and its other affiliates and us is subject to the prior approval by our Audit Committee, but generally does not require the separate approval of our stockholders, and if such stockholder approval is required, Cantor may retain sufficient voting power to provide any such requisite approval without the affirmative consent of our other stockholders. There is no assurance that such restructuring would not result in a material expense or disruption to our business.

We also have entered into agreements that provide certain rights to the holder of a majority of the Newmark Holdings exchangeable limited partnership interest, which is currently Cantor. For example, the Separation and Distribution Agreement provides that dividends for a year to our common stockholders that are 25% or more of our post-tax Adjusted Earnings per fully diluted share for such year shall require the consent of the holder of a majority of the Newmark Holdings exchangeable limited partnership interests. In addition, the Separation and Distribution Agreement requires Newmark to contribute any reinvestment cash (i.e., any cash that Newmark retains, after the payment of taxes, as a result of distributing a smaller percentage than Newmark Holdings from the distributions they receive from Newmark OpCo), as an additional capital contribution with respect to its existing limited partnership interest in Newmark OpCo, unless Newmark and the holder of a majority of the Newmark Holdings exchangeable limited partnership interests agree otherwise. It is possible that Cantor, as the holder of a majority of the

Newmark Holdings exchangeable limited partnership interest, will not agree to a higher dividend percentage or a different use of reinvestment cash, even if doing so might be more advantageous to the Newmark stockholders.

Our agreements and other arrangements with BGC Group and Cantor, including the Separation and Distribution Agreement, may be amended upon agreement of the parties to those agreements and approval of our Audit Committee. We may not be able to resolve any potential conflicts, and, even if we do, the resolution may be less favorable to us than if we were dealing with an unaffiliated party. In order to address potential conflicts of interest between or among BGC Group, Cantor and their respective representatives and us, our Certificate of Incorporation contains provisions regulating and defining the conduct of our affairs as they may involve BGC Group and/or Cantor and their respective representatives, and our powers, rights, duties and liabilities and those of our representatives in connection therewith.

Cantor may compete with us for acquisitions or other business opportunities.

Cantor has existing real estate-related businesses and may, from time to time, sponsor SPACs or invest in other ventures which have a real estate focus. While these businesses do not currently compete with Newmark, it is possible that, in the future, real estate-related opportunities in which Newmark would be interested may also be pursued by Cantor and/or Cantor may conduct activities in any real estate-related business or asset-backed securities-related business or any extensions thereof and ancillary activities thereto. For example, Cantor’s commercial lending business has historically offered conduit loans to the multifamily market. While conduit loans have certain key differences versus multifamily agency loans, such as those offered by our capital markets business, there can be no assurance that Cantor’s lending businesses will not seek to offer multifamily loans to our existing and potential multifamily customer base.

Moreover, the service of officers or partners of Cantor as our officers and directors, and those persons’ ownership interests in and payments from Cantor and its affiliates, SPACs and similar investments or other entities, could create conflicts of interest when we and those directors or officers are faced with decisions that could have different implications for us and them.

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that, to the greatest extent permitted by law, no Cantor Company or BGC Group Company, each as defined in our Certificate of Incorporation, or any of the representatives, as defined in our Certificate of Incorporation, of a Cantor Company or BGC Group Company will, in its capacity as our stockholder or affiliate, owe or be liable for breach of any fiduciary duty to us or any of our stockholders. In addition, to the greatest extent permitted by law, none of any Cantor Company, BGC Group Company or any of their respective representatives will owe any duty to refrain from engaging in the same or similar activities or lines of business as us or our representatives or doing business with any of our or our representatives’ clients or customers. If any Cantor Company, BGC Group Company or any of their respective representatives acquires knowledge of a potential transaction or matter that may be a corporate opportunity (as defined in our Certificate of Incorporation) for any such person, on the one hand, and us or any of our representatives, on the other hand, such person will have no duty to communicate or offer such corporate opportunity to us or any of our representatives, and will not be liable to us, any of our stockholders or any of our representatives for breach of any fiduciary duty by reason of the fact that they pursue or acquire such corporate opportunity for themselves, direct such corporate opportunity to another person or do not present such corporate opportunity to us or any of our representatives, subject to the requirement described in the following sentence. If a third-party presents a corporate opportunity to a person who is both our representative and a representative of a BGC Group Company and/or a Cantor Company, expressly and solely in such person’s capacity as our representative, and such person acts in good faith in a manner consistent with the policy that such corporate opportunity belongs to us, then such person will be deemed to have fully satisfied and fulfilled any fiduciary duty that such person has to us as our representative with respect to such corporate opportunity, provided that any BGC Group Company, any Cantor Company or any of their respective representatives may pursue such corporate opportunity if we decide not to pursue such corporate opportunity.

The corporate opportunity policy that is included in our Certificate of Incorporation is designed to resolve potential conflicts of interest between us and our representatives and BGC Group, Cantor and their respective representatives. The Newmark Holdings and Newmark OpCo limited partnership agreements contain similar provisions with respect to us and/or BGC Group and Cantor and each of our respective representatives. This policy, however, could make it easier for BGC Group or Cantor to compete with us. If BGC Group or Cantor competes with us, it could materially harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Agreements between us and/or Cantor or its affiliates are between related parties, and the terms of these agreements may be less favorable to us than those that we could negotiate with third parties and may subject us to litigation.

Our relationship with Cantor and/or its affiliates may result in agreements with Cantor and/or its affiliates that are between related parties. For example, we provide to and receive from Cantor and/or its affiliates various administrative services and transition services. As a result, the prices charged to us or by us for services provided under any agreements with such entities may be higher or lower than prices that may be charged by third parties, and the terms of these agreements may be less favorable to us than those that we could have negotiated with third parties. Any future material related-party transaction or arrangement between us and such parties is subject to the prior approval by our Audit Committee, but generally does not require the separate approval of our stockholders, and if such stockholder approval were required, Cantor may retain sufficient voting power to provide any such requisite approval without the affirmative consent of our other stockholders. These related-party relationships may also from time to time subject us to litigation.

We are controlled by Cantor. Cantor controls its wholly owned subsidiary, CF&Co, which may provide us with investment banking services from time to time. In addition, Cantor, CF&Co and their affiliates may provide us with advice and other services from time to time.

We are controlled by Cantor. Cantor, in turn, controls its wholly owned subsidiary, CF&Co. Cantor, CF&Co and their affiliates have provided investment banking services to us and our affiliates in the past and may be expected to do so in the future, including acting as our financial advisor in connection with business combinations, dispositions or other transactions, and placing or recommending to us various investments, stock loans or cash management vehicles. They receive customary fees and commissions for these services in accordance with our investment banking engagement letter with CF&Co. They may also receive brokerage and market data and analytics products and services from us and our respective affiliates. CF&Co may make a market in our notes once the appropriate registration statement is filed with the SEC.

RISKS RELATED TO OWNERSHIP OF OUR CLASS A COMMON STOCK AND OUR STATUS AS A PUBLIC COMPANY

If we fail to implement and maintain an effective internal control environment, our operations, reputation and stock price could suffer, we may need to restate our financial statements and we may be delayed in or prevented from accessing the capital markets.

As a public company, we are required, under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This assessment is required to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our key internal controls over financial reporting. A material weakness is a control deficiency or combination of control deficiencies that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. To ensure compliance with Section 404, we will continue to evaluate our key internal controls over financial reporting, including with respect to acquisitions.

Internal controls over financial reporting, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, internal controls determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. Moreover, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate due to changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. As such, we could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which may have a material adverse effect on our reputation and stock price.

Our ability to identify and remediate any material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting could affect our ability to prepare financial reports in a timely manner, control our policies, procedures, operations and assets, assess and manage our operational, regulatory and financial risks, and integrate our acquired businesses. Similarly, we need to effectively manage any growth that we achieve in such a way as to ensure continuing compliance with all applicable control, financial reporting and legal and regulatory requirements. Any material failure to ensure full compliance with control and financial reporting requirements, including as a result of acquisitions, could result in restatement of our financial statements, delay or prevent us from accessing the capital markets and harm our reputation and/or the market price for our Class A common stock.

Purchasers of our Class A common stock, as well as existing stockholders, may experience significant dilution as a result of sales of shares of our Class A common stock by us, and the perception that such sales could occur may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our stock.

We may sell shares of our Class A common stock from time to time, including, without limitation, in connection with underwritten offerings, any “at-the-market” controlled equity offering program we may establish, or to our employees and partners. We may also facilitate forms of compensatory unit monetization which may result in the issuance of shares to employees and partners. As a well-known seasoned issuer, we may file an automatic shelf registration statement and commence a registered offering, including of our Class A common stock, immediately thereafter.

We have an effective registration statement on Form S-4 with respect to the offer and sale of up to 20 million shares of our Class A common stock from time to time in connection with business combination transactions, including acquisitions of other businesses, assets, properties or securities. As of December 31, 2024, we have issued an aggregate of 2,681,096 shares of our Class A common stock under this registration statement. We have filed registration statements on Form S-8 pursuant to which we have registered the shares underlying the Equity Plan. As of December 31, 2024, there were 389.6 million shares remaining for issuance under such registration statements.

Our management will have broad discretion as to the timing and amount of sales of our Class A common stock in any offering by us, as well as the application of the net proceeds of any such sales. Accordingly, purchasers in any such offering will be relying on the judgment of our management with regard to the use of such net proceeds, and purchasers will not have the opportunity, as part of their investment decision, to assess whether the proceeds are being used appropriately. It is possible that the proceeds will be invested in a way that does not yield a favorable, or any, return for us and cause the price of our Class A common stock to decline.

We cannot predict the effect, if any, of future sales of our Class A common stock, or the availability of shares for future sales, on the market price of our Class A common stock. Sales of substantial amounts of our Class A common stock, or the perception that such sales could occur, could dilute existing holders of our Class A common stock and may adversely affect prevailing market prices for our Class A common stock.

Because future sales of our Class A common stock may be made in the markets at prevailing market prices or at prices related to such prevailing market prices, the prices at which these shares have been sold and may be sold in the future will vary, and these variations may be significant. Purchasers of these shares may suffer significant dilution if the price they pay is higher than the price paid by other purchasers of shares of our Class A common stock in any future offerings of shares of our Class A common stock. In addition, the sale by us of any shares of our Class A common stock may decrease our existing Class A common stockholders’ proportionate ownership interest in us, reduce the amount of cash available per share for dividends payable on shares of our Class A common stock and diminish the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding share of our Class A common stock.

Delaware law, our corporate organizational documents and other requirements may impose various impediments to the ability of a third-party to acquire control of us, which could deprive our investors of the opportunity to receive a premium for their shares.

We are a Delaware corporation, and the anti-takeover provisions of the DGCL, our Certificate of Incorporation and our Bylaws impose various impediments to the ability of a third-party to acquire control of us, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our Class A stockholders.

These provisions, summarized below, may discourage coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids. These provisions may also encourage persons seeking to acquire control of us to first negotiate with our Board of Directors. We believe that the benefits of increased protection give us the potential ability to negotiate with the initiator of an unfriendly or unsolicited proposal to acquire or restructure us and outweigh the disadvantages of discouraging those proposals because negotiation of them could result in an improvement of their terms.

Our Bylaws provide that special meetings of stockholders may be called only by the Chairman of our Board of Directors, or in the event the Chairman of our Board of Directors is unavailable, by the Chief Executive Officer or by the holders of a majority of the voting power of our Class B common stock, which is currently held by Cantor and CFGM. In addition, our Certificate of Incorporation permits us to issue “blank check” preferred stock.

Our Bylaws require advance written notice prior to a meeting of our stockholders of a proposal or director nomination which a stockholder desires to present at such a meeting, which generally must be received by our Secretary not later than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of our proxy statement for the preceding year’s annual meeting. In the event that the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be so delivered not later than the close of business on the later of the 120th day prior to the date of such proxy statement or the tenth day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by us. Our Bylaws provide that all amendments to our Bylaws must be approved by either the holders of a majority of the voting power of all of our outstanding capital stock entitled to vote or by a majority of our Board of Directors.

We have elected in our Certificate of Incorporation not to be subject to Section 203 of the DGCL, which generally prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a business combination, such as a merger, with a person or group owning 15% or more of the corporation’s voting stock, for a period of three years following the date on which the person became an interested stockholder, unless (with certain exceptions) the business combination or the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder is approved in accordance with Section 203. Accordingly, we are not subject to the anti-takeover effects of Section 203. However, our Certificate of Incorporation contains provisions that have the same effect as Section 203, except that they provide that each of the Qualified Class B Holders, as defined therein, and certain of their direct transferees will not be deemed to be “interested stockholders,” and accordingly will not be subject to such restrictions.

Further, certain of the awards under our Equity Plan contain provisions pursuant to which grants that are unexercisable or unvested may automatically become exercisable or vested as of the date immediately prior to certain change of control events. Additionally, change in control and employment agreements between us and our named executive officers also provide for certain grants, payments and grants of exchangeability, and exercisability in the event of certain change of control events.

The foregoing factors, as well as the significant common stock ownership by Cantor, including shares of our Class B common stock, and rights to acquire additional such shares, and the provisions of any debt agreements could impede a merger, takeover or other business combination or discourage a potential investor from making a tender offer for our Class A common stock that could result in a premium over the market price for shares of Class A common stock.

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that a state court located within the State of Delaware (or, if no state court located within the State of Delaware has jurisdiction, the federal court for the District of Delaware) shall be the sole and exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, employees or agents.

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that, unless we consent to the selection of an alternative forum, a state court located within the State of Delaware (or, if no state court located within the State of Delaware has jurisdiction, the federal court for the District of Delaware) shall be the sole and exclusive forum for any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; any action asserting a claim for or based on a breach of duty or obligation owed by any current or former director, officer, employee or agent of ours to us or to our stockholders, including any claim alleging the aiding and abetting of such a breach; any action asserting a claim against us or any current or former director, officer, employee or agent of ours arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or our Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws; any action asserting a claim related to or involving us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine; or any action asserting an “internal corporate claim” as that term is defined in Section 115 of the DGCL. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers, employees or agents, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers, employees and agents. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our Certificate of Incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

GENERAL RISKS

Employee misconduct, fraud, miscommunication or error could harm us by impairing our ability to attract and retain customers and subjecting us to significant financial losses, legal liability, regulatory sanctions and penalties and reputational harm; moreover, misconduct is difficult to detect and deter, and error is difficult to prevent.

Employee errors and miscommunication, including mistakes in executing, recording or processing transactions for customers, could cause us to suffer liability, loss, sanction and/or reputational harm, which could expose us to the risk of material losses even if the errors and miscommunication are detected and the transactions are unwound or reversed.

It is not always possible to deter and detect employee misconduct or fraud or prevent errors and miscommunications. While we have various supervisory systems and compliance processes and procedures in place, and seek to mitigate applicable risks, the precautions we take to deter and detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in all cases. Misconduct or fraud by employees could include engaging in improper or unauthorized transactions or activities, failing to properly supervise other employees or improperly using confidential information.

Ongoing scrutiny and changing expectations from stockholders, clients and customers with respect to the Company’s corporate responsibility or ESG practices may result in additional costs or risks.

Companies across our industry are facing continuing scrutiny related to their corporate responsibility or ESG practices and related demographic disclosures. Investor advocacy groups, certain institutional investors, investment funds and other influential investors are also focused on such practices and related demographic disclosures and in recent years have placed increasing importance on the non-financial impacts of their investments. Further, customer bids, requests for proposals and other customer arrangements or opportunities may require disclosure of or improvements in ESG metrics in order to compete for business. While we have published a corporate responsibility report and are focused on these efforts and disclosures, if our practices and disclosure of specific metrics do not meet customer, investor or other industry participant expectations, which continue to evolve, we may not win or may lose customers, or may incur additional costs and our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially adversely affected.

We face increasing financial, regulatory, and transitional risks associated with the effects of climate change.

Extreme weather events such as flooding, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, extreme temperatures and wildfires could negatively impact our operations or the physical assets and operations of our clients. Such weather events that affect one or more of our offices could disrupt our operations and increase our operating costs. Additionally, related regulation, including regulation designed to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions of buildings or any climate change related rules, could negatively affect us or our clients.