Restaurant Brands International Inc
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Feb 21, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2024 · Filed Feb 21, 2025
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Restaurant Brands International Inc.:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Restaurant Brands International Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 21, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Fair value of operating lease assets, lease liabilities and reacquired franchise rights acquired in a business combination
As discussed in Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, on May 16, 2024, the Company acquired the remaining 85% of Carrols Restaurant Group, Inc. (“Carrols”) issued and outstanding shares that were not already held previously by the Company or its affiliates. The Carrols acquisition was accounted for as a business combination by applying the acquisition method of accounting. In connection with the transaction, the Company acquired operating lease assets with a fair value of $705 million, operating lease liabilities, net of current portion with a fair value of $684 million and reacquired franchise rights with a fair value of $363 million. The fair value of the acquired operating lease assets and lease liabilities was determined by discounting the lease payments for each lease using the Company’s incremental borrowing rate corresponding to the maturity of each lease as the discount rate. The incremental borrowing rate applicable to each lease is determined by reference to the Company’s outstanding secured borrowings and implied spreads over the risk-free discount rates that correspond to the term of each lease. The fair value of the reacquired franchise rights was determined using the excess earnings method.
We identified the assessment of the acquisition-date fair value of the operating lease assets, lease liabilities and reacquired franchise rights as a critical audit matter. The evaluation of certain assumptions used to estimate these fair values involved a higher degree of subjective auditor judgment and specialized skills and knowledge. Specifically, those key assumptions included the incremental borrowing rates for the valuation of the operating lease assets and lease liabilities and the discount rate for the reacquired franchise rights. Changes to those key assumptions could have had an impact on the determination of the fair values.
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter: We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls over the Company’s process to estimate the fair value of the operating lease assets, lease liabilities and reacquired franchise rights, including controls over the determination of the incremental borrowing rates and discount rate. We evaluated the Company’s methodology to develop the fair values of the operating lease assets, lease liabilities and reacquired franchise rights. We performed sensitivity analyses over the Company’s incremental borrowing rates and discount rate to evaluate the impact of changes in those assumptions on the Company’s determination of fair values. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:
evaluating the incremental borrowing rates by comparing them to a range of rates independently developed using company-specific information and publicly available market data
evaluating the discount rate by comparing it to a range of discount rates independently developed using publicly available market data for comparable restaurant companies.
Recoverability assessment of the Firehouse Subs brand
As described in Notes 2 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company had recorded an indefinite-lived intangible asset for the Firehouse Subs brand of $816 million as of December 31, 2024. The Company performs indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment testing annually or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment might have occurred. To estimate the fair value of the Firehouse Subs Brand indefinite-lived intangible asset, the Company uses an income approach, which discounts the projected brand-related cash flows using a discount rate determined from a market participant’s perspective.
We identified the evaluation of the recoverability assessment of the Firehouse Subs brand as a critical audit matter. Subjective auditor judgment and specialized skills and knowledge were required to evaluate the projected revenue and discount rate assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the Firehouse Subs brand. Changes to those key assumptions could have had an impact on the Company’s fair value determination and the assessment of the recoverability of the Firehouse Subs brand.
The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter: We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls over the Company’s process to assess recoverability of indefinite-lived intangible assets, including controls related to the Company’s determination of projected revenue and selection of the discount rate assumption used in the determination of the fair value of the Firehouse Subs brand. We performed sensitivity analyses over the Company’s projected revenue and the discount rate to evaluate the impact of changes in those assumptions on the Company’s estimated fair value of the Firehouse Subs brand. We evaluated the reasonableness of the Company’s projected revenue by comparing actual results to the Company’s historical forecasts. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:
evaluating the projected revenue prepared by the Company by comparing it to publicly available projected revenue for comparable restaurant companies
evaluating the discount rate by comparing it against an independently developed discount rate using publicly available market data for comparable restaurant companies.
(signed) KPMG LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 1989.
Miami, Florida
February 21, 2025
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
Restaurant Brands International Inc.:
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Restaurant Brands International Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 21, 2025 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
The Company acquired Carrols Restaurant Group Inc. during 2024, and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2024, Carrols Restaurant Group Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of $1,988 million and total revenues of $1,171 million included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Carrols Restaurant Group Inc..
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
(signed) KPMG LLP
Miami, Florida
February 21, 2025
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.