CAL-MAINE FOODS INC
For the period ended Jun 1, 2024. Filed Jul 23, 2024.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2024 · Filed Jul 23, 2024
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our
and
results
of
are
subject
to
numerous
risks
and
uncertainties,
many
of
which
are
beyond
our
control. The following is a description of the known factors that may materially affect
our business, financial condition or results
of operations. They
should be considered
carefully,
in addition
to the information
set forth
elsewhere in
this Annual
Report on
Form
10-K,
under
Part
II.
Management’s
Discussion
and
Analysis
of
Condition
and
Results
of
Operations,
in
making
any
decisions
with
respect
to
our
securities. Additional
risks
or
that
are
not
currently known
to us,
or that we
are aware
of but
currently deem
to be
immaterial or
apply to
any company
could
also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results
of operations.
INDUSTRY RISK FACTORS
Market prices
of wholesale
are volatile,
and decreases
in these
prices can
adversely impact
our revenues
and
profits.
Our operating results are significantly
affected by wholesale shell egg
market prices, which fluctuate widely and
are outside our
control. As
a result,
our prior
should not
be presumed
to be
an accurate
indication of
future performance.
Under
certain circumstances, small increases
in production, or small
decreases in demand, within
the industry might
have a large adverse
effect on shell egg prices. Low shell egg prices adversely affect
our revenues and profits.
Market prices for
wholesale shell eggs
have been volatile
and cyclical. Shell
egg prices have
risen in the
past during periods
of
high demand such as the initial outbreak of
the COVID-19 pandemic and periods when high protein
diets are popular. Shell egg
prices
have
also
risen
during
periods
of
constrained
supply,
such
as
the
latest
highly
avian
(“HPAI”)
outbreak
that was
first detected
in domestic
commercial flocks
in February
- During
times when
prices are
high, the
egg
has
typically
geared
up
to
produce
more
eggs,
by
increasing
the
number
of
layers,
which
historically
has
ultimately resulted in an oversupply of eggs, leading to a period of lower prices.
As discussed
above in
Part I. Item 1. Business – Seasonality
, seasonal fluctuations
impact shell
egg prices. Therefore,
comparisons
of
our
sales
and
results
between
different
within
a
single
fiscal
year
are
not
necessarily
meaningful
comparisons.
A decline in consumer demand for shell eggs can negatively impact our business.
We believe high
-protein diet trends, industry advertising campaigns,
the improved nutritional reputation of eggs and an increase
in at-home consumption
of eggs during
the COVID-19 pandemic,
have all contributed
at one time or
another to increased
shell
egg demand. However, it is possible that the demand for shell eggs will decline in the future. Adverse publicity relating to health
or safety
concerns and
the perception
of the
nutritional
value
eggs,
consumer
views regarding
consumption of
animal-based products,
as well
as movement
away from
high protein
diets, could
shell eggs, which could have a material adverse effect on our future
results of operations and financial condition.
Feed costs are volatile and increases in these costs can
adversely impact our results of operations.
Feed costs are the largest element of our shell
egg (farm) production cost, ranging from 55%
to 63% of total farm production cost
in the last five fiscal years.
Although feed ingredients, primarily corn and soybean
meal, are available from a
number of sources, we do
not have control over
the prices
of the
ingredients we
purchase, which
are affected
by weather,
various global
and U.S.
supply and
demand factors,
transportation
and
storage
costs,
speculators,
and
agricultural,
energy
and
trade
policies
in
the
U.S.
and
internationally.
For
example, while feed
costs declined during fiscal
2024, we saw higher
prices for corn and soybean
meal in fiscal 2022
and 2023
as a result of
weather-related shortfalls in
production and yields,
ongoing supply chain
disruptions and the
Russia-Ukraine War
and its impact on the export markets. Our costs for corn and soybean meal
are also affected by local basis prices.
Increases in feed
costs unaccompanied by increases
in the selling price
of eggs can have
a material adverse effect
on the results
of our operations
and cash flow.
Alternatively,
low feed costs
can encourage
egg industry overproduction,
possibly resulting in
lower egg prices and lower revenue.
Agricultural risks,
including outbreaks
of avian
diseases such as
HPAI,
have harmed
and in
the future
could harm
our
Our shell egg
production activities are
subject to a variety
of agricultural risks.
Unusual or extreme
weather conditions, disease
and pests can materially and adversely affect the quality and quantity of shell eggs
we produce and distribute. Outbreaks of avian
influenza among poultry
occur periodically worldwide
and have occurred
sporadically in the
U.S. Since the
HPAI
outbreaks in
2015, there were no reported
significant outbreaks of HPAI in the commercial table egg
layer flocks in the
U.S. until the February
– December
2022 time
period and
then again
beginning in
November 2023.
During the
third and
fourth quarters
of our
fiscal
experienced HPAI
outbreaks within
our facilities
located in
Kansas and
Texas,
resulting in
total depopulation
of 3.1
million laying hens
and 577,000 pullets.
Both locations have
been cleared by
the USDA to resume
operations and repopulation
is expected to
be completed
before calendar
year end. As
of July 5,
2024, the
U.S. Centers for
Disease Control
and Prevention
(“CDC”) reported
outbreaks in 138
dairy herds in
12 states and
five cases in
the U.S. in
persons who were
exposed to infected
cows or poultry.
The CDC has not
reported any case of
human-to-human transmission. The
CDC considers that the
overall risk
to the general U.S. public
posed by the virus remains
low; however,
as a precautionary measure,
the U.S. Department of
Health
and
Human
Services
has
awarded
funding
to
Moderna
to
develop
a
human
vaccine
against
avian
influenza.
For
information, refer to
Part II. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations –
HPAI
.
We
and
to reduce
the risk
of
exposing
our
flocks and
to harmful
diseases;
despite these
efforts, outbreaks
of avian
diseases can
and do
still occur
and have
adversely impacted,
and may
in the
future adversely impact, the health of our flocks and could in the future adversely impact the health of our employees. Continued
or intensified spread of HPAI could have a material adverse impact on our financial results
by increasing government restrictions
on the sale and
distribution of our products
and requiring us to
euthanize the affected
layers. Negative publicity
from outbreaks
within our industry
can negatively impact
customer perception. If
a substantial portion
of our layers
or production facilities
are
affected by any of these factors in any given quarter or year,
our business, financial condition, and results of operations could
be
materially and adversely affected.
Shell
eggs
and
shell
egg
are
susceptible
to
microbial
contamination,
and
we
may
be
to,
or we
may
voluntarily, recall
contaminated products.
Shell eggs
and shell
are vulnerable
to contamination
by pathogens
such as
Salmonella. The
Company maintains
policies and procedures designed to comply with the complex rules and regulations governing egg production, such as The Final
Egg
Rule
issued
by
the
FDA
“Prevention
of
Salmonella
Enteritidis
in
Shell
Eggs
During
Production,
Storage,
and
Transportation,” and
the FDA’s
Food Safety Modernization Act. Shipment
of contaminated products, even
if inadvertent, could
result in a
violation of law and
lead to increased
risk of exposure
to product liability
claims, product recalls
and scrutiny by
federal
and
state
agencies.
We
have
little,
if
any,
control
over
proper
handling
once
the
product
has
been
shipped
or
delivered. In
purchased
from
other
could
contain
contaminants
that
might
be
inadvertently
redistributed by us. As such, we might decide or be required
to recall a product if we, our customers
or regulators believe it poses
a potential
health risk.
Any product
recall could
a loss
of consumer
confidence in
our products,
our
reputation
with existing
and potential
customers and
have a
material adverse
effect
on our
business, results
of operations
and
financial condition. We
currently maintain insurance
with respect to certain of
these risks, including product
liability insurance,
interruption
insurance,
product
recall
and
general
insurance,
but
in
many
cases
such
is
expensive, difficult
to obtain
and no
assurance can
be given
that such
insurance can
be maintained
in the
future on
acceptable
terms, or in sufficient amounts to protect us against losses due
to any such events, or at all.
Our profitability
may be adversely
impacted by
increases in other
input costs such
as packaging materials
and delivery
expenses, including as a result of inflation.
In addition to feed ingredient costs, other significant input costs include costs of packaging materials and delivery expenses. Our
packing materials
increased during
the past
three fiscal
years due
to inflation
and higher
labor costs,
and during
also as a
result of supply
chain constraints initially
caused by
the pandemic,
and these costs
may continue
to increase. We
also
experienced increases in delivery expenses during fiscal 2023 and 2022 due to increases in fuel and labor costs for both our fleet
and contract
trucking, and
these costs
may continue
to increase.
Increases in
these costs
are largely
outside of
our control
and
have an adverse effect on our profitability and cash flow.
BUSINESS AND OPERATIONAL
Our acquisition growth strategy subjects us to various risks.
As discussed in
Part I. Item I. Business – Growth Strategy
, we plan to continue to pursue a growth strategy that includes,
in part,
selective
of
other
engaged
in
the
and
sale of
shell
eggs,
with
a
priority
on
those
that
will
facilitate our ability to
expand our cage-free shell
egg production capabilities in
key locations and markets.
We may over-estimate
or under-estimate the demand for cage-free
eggs, which could cause
our acquisition strategy to be
less-than-optimal for our future
growth and profitability.
The number of
existing businesses with
cage-free capacity
that we may be
able to purchase
is limited,
as
most
of
shell
eggs
by
other
in
our
markets
currently
does
not
meet
demands
or
legal
requirements to be designated as cage-free. Conversely,
if we acquire cage-free production capacity,
which is more expensive to
and
operate,
and
demands
or
legal
for
eggs
were
to
change,
the
lack
of
demand for cage-free eggs may result in higher costs and lower profitability
.
Acquisitions require capital resources and can divert management’s attention from our existing business. Acquisitions also entail
an inherent risk that we
could become subject to contingent or
other liabilities, including liabilities arising from
events or conduct
prior to
our acquisition
of a
business that
were unknown
to us
at the
time of
acquisition. We
could incur
significantly greater
expenditures in integrating an acquired business than we anticipated at the
time of its purchase.
We cannot assure
you that we:
will identify suitable acquisition candidates;
can consummate acquisitions on acceptable terms;
can successfully integrate an acquired business into our operations; or
can successfully manage the operations of an acquired business.
No
can
be
given
that
we
acquire
in
the
future
will
contribute
positively
to
our
results
of
or
financial condition.
In addition,
federal antitrust
laws require
regulatory approval
of acquisitions
that exceed
certain threshold
levels of significance, and we cannot guarantee that such approvals
would be obtained.
The consideration
we pay in
connection with any
acquisition affects
our financial results.
If we pay
cash, we could
be required
to
use
a
portion
of
our
cash
or
credit
facility
to
consummate
the
acquisition.
To
the
extent
we
issue
shares
of
our
Common Stock, existing stockholders may
be diluted. In addition,
acquisitions may result in
additional debt. Our ability to
access
any additional
capital that
may be
needed for
an acquisition
may be
adversely impacted
by higher
interest rates
and economic
uncertainty.
Global
or
health
crises including
pandemics
or
epidemics
could
have
an
adverse impact
on
our
business and
The
effects
of
global
or
pandemics
or
epidemics
can
significantly
impact
our
Although
demand
for
our
products could
increase as
a result
of restrictions
such as
travel bans
and restrictions,
quarantines, shelter-in-place
orders, and
business and government shutdowns, which can
prompt more consumers to eat
at home, these restrictions
could also significantly
increase our cost of doing business due to labor shortages, supply-chain disruptions, increased costs
and decreased availability of
packaging supplies or
feed, and increased
medical and other
costs.
We
experienced these impacts
as a result of
the COVID-19
pandemic,
during
our
fiscal
years
and
The
pandemic
recovery
also
contributed
to
higher
inflation
and
rates,
which
persist
and
may
to
persist.
The
impacts
of
health
crises
are
difficult
to
predict
and
depend
on
numerous factors
including the
severity,
length and
geographic scope
of the
outbreak, resurgences
of the
disease and
variants,
and
acceptance
of vaccines,
and governmental,
and
individuals’
responses.
A resurgence
of
COVID-19
and/or variants, or
any future major public
health crisis, would disrupt
our business and could
have a material adverse
effect on
our financial results.
Our largest customers have accounted for a significant portion of our net sales volume. Accordingly, our business may be
adversely affected by the loss of, or reduced purchases by,
one or more of our large customers.
Our customers, such as supermarkets, warehouse clubs
and food distributors, have continued to consolidate and consolidation
is
expected to continue. These consolidations have
produced larger customers and potential customers with
increased buying power
that are more
capable of operating
with reduced
inventories, opposing
price increases,
and demanding
lower pricing,
promotional programs and specifically tailored products. Because of these trends,
our volume growth could slow or
we may need
to lower prices or increase promotional spending for our products, any of
which could adversely affect our financial results.
Our top
three customers
an aggregate of
49.0%, 50.1%
and 45.9%
of net sales
dollars for
2023, and
2022, respectively.
Our largest
customer,
Walmart
Inc. (including
Sam's Club),
33.8%, 34.2%
and 29.5%
of net
sales dollars for fiscal 2024, 2023 and
2022, respectively. Although we have established long-term relationships with most of our
customers who
continue to purchase
from us based
on our ability
to service their
needs, they are
generally free to
acquire shell
eggs from
other sources. If,
for any
reason, one
or more
of our
large customers
were to
purchase significantly
less of
our shell
eggs in the
future or terminate their
purchases from us, and
we were not
able to sell
our shell eggs to
new customers at comparable
levels, it would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, and results of operations.
Our business is highly competitive.
The production and sale of fresh shell eggs, which accounted for 96.1% to 96.6% of our net sales in our
last three fiscal years, is
intensely
competitive.
We
compete
with
a large
number
of competitors
that may
prove to
be more
successful
than
we are
in
producing, marketing and selling shell eggs. We
cannot provide assurance that we will be able to compete successfully with any
or all of these companies. Increased competition could result in price reductions, greater cyclicality,
reduced margins and loss of
market share, which would negatively affect our business, results
of operations, and financial condition.
We
are
on
our
team,
and
the
loss
of
any
key
member
of
this
team
may
affect
the
implementation of our business plan in a timely manner.
Our success
depends largely
upon the
continued service
of our
senior management
team. The
loss or interruption
of service
of
one or more
of our key
executive officers
could adversely affect
our ability to
manage our operations
effectively and/or
pursue
our growth strategy.
We
have not entered
into any employment
or non-compete agreements
with any of
our executive officers.
Competition could cause us to lose talented employees, and unplanned turnover could deplete institutional knowledge
and result
in increased costs due to increased competition for employees.
Our
is
on
our
technology
systems
and
software,
and
failure
to
protect
against
or
effectively respond to
cyber-attacks, security
breaches, or other
incidents involving those systems,
could adversely affect
day-to-day operations
and decision making processes and have an adverse effect
on our performance and reputation.
The efficient operation of our business depends
on our information technology systems, which we rely
on to effectively manage
our
data,
communications,
logistics,
accounting,
and
other
processes.
If
we
do
not
allocate
and
effectively manage the resources necessary to build and sustain an appropriate technology environment, our business, reputation,
or financial results could be negatively impacted.
In addition, our information technology systems may be vulnerable
to damage
or
interruption
from
circumstances
beyond
our
control,
systems
failures,
natural
disasters,
terrorist
attacks,
viruses, ransomware, security breaches
or cyber incidents. Cyber-attacks
are becoming more sophisticated
and are increasing in
the number of attempts and frequency by groups and individuals with a wide range of motives. We
have experienced and expect
to continue to experience attempted cyber-attacks of our information
technology systems or networks.
We regularly engage with
third-party service providers
as part
of our operations
to provide a
high level of
service to our
customers.
We have
implemented certain practices and policies
to minimize the potential risks associated with
the exchange of information
with contracted
vendors. Despite
these practices
and policies,
we cannot
guarantee that
information technology
systems of
our
service providers
will prevent
and detect
all cybersecurity
breaches and
incidents. Although
we require
service providers to notify us
upon a potential breach
or incident, there is
a potential risk that
our business, reputation,
or financial
results could be negatively impacted by cybersecurity incidents at their businesses
.
Additionally, future or past business
transactions (such as acquisitions
or integrations) could expose
us to additional
risks and vulnerabilities, as our systems could be negatively affected
by vulnerabilities present in acquired or integrated systems
and technologies.
Furthermore, we
may discover
security issues
that were
not found
during due
diligence of
such acquired
or
integrated businesses,
and it
may be
difficult to
integrate businesses
into our
information technology
environment and security
Our information technology systems also subject us to numerous data privacy obligations. We
may at times fail (or be perceived
to have failed)
in our efforts
to comply with
our data privacy obligations.
If we or the
third parties on which
we rely fail, or
are
perceived to have failed, to address or comply
with applicable data privacy obligations, we could face significant
consequences,
including but not
limited to government
enforcement actions and
litigation. A security breach of
sensitive information could
result
in damage
to our reputation
and our relations
with our customers
or employees.
Any such damage
or interruption
could have
a
material adverse effect on our business.
and
related
business and
to change
rapidly.
Failure to
update
or replace
legacy
systems
to
address
these
changes
could
result
in
costs,
costs,
system
downtime,
third
party
litigation, regulatory actions or cyber security vulnerabilities which could
have a material adverse effect on our business.
Labor shortages or increases in labor costs could adversely
impact our business and results of operations.
Our
success
is
upon
recruiting,
motivating,
and
retaining
staff
to
operate
our
farms.
Approximately
76%
of
our
at hourly
rates, often
in entry-level
positions. While
all our
employees are
paid at
rates above
the federal
minimum wage requirements,
any significant increase
in local, state or
federal minimum wage
requirements could increase
our
labor costs. In
addition, any
regulatory changes
requiring us to
provide additional
employee benefits
or mandating
increases in
other employee-related
costs, such as
unemployment insurance
or workers compensation,
would increase our
costs. A shortage
in
the
labor
pool,
which
may
be
caused
by
competition
from
other
employers,
the
remote
locations
of
many
of
our
farms,
decreased labor participation rates
or changes in government-provided support
or immigration laws, particularly
in times of lower
unemployment, could adversely affect our business and results of operations. A shortage of labor available to us could cause our
farms to operate
with reduced staff,
which could negatively impact
our production capacity
and efficiencies.
In fiscal 2022, our
labor
costs
due
to
the
pandemic
and
its
effects,
which
caused
us
to
wages
in
response
to
labor
shortages.
In
fiscal
and
2024,
labor
wages
continued
to
rise
due
to
inflation
and
low
unemployment.
Accordingly,
any
significant labor shortages or increases in our labor costs could have
a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We are controlled by the family of our late founder, Fred
R. Adams, Jr., and Adolphus B. Baker,
Chairman of our Board
of Directors,
controls the vote of 100% of our outstanding Class A Common Stock.
Fred R. Adams, Jr.,
our Founder and Chairman Emeritus
died on March 29, 2020. A
limited liability company (the
“Daughters’
LLC”), owned by
Mr. Adams’
son-in-law,
Adolphus B. Baker,
Chairman of our board
of directors, Mr.
Baker’s spouse and
her
three sisters
(Mr.
Adams’ four
daughters) (collectively,
the “Family”),
owns 100%
of our
outstanding Class
A Common
Stock
(which has
10 votes
per share),
controlling approximately
52.0% of
our total
voting power.
As sole
managing member
of the
Daughters’
LLC,
Mr.
Baker
the
vote
of
100%
of
our
Class
A
Common
Stock,
except
that
certain
extraordinary matters requiring the
vote of the
Company’s stockholders such as a
merger or amendment of
the Company’s Second
Amended
and Restated
Certificate of
Incorporation
require joint
of Mr.
Baker and
members of
the Daughters’
LLC
holding a majority of its voting
interests. Family members also have
additional voting power due to beneficial
ownership of our
Common Stock (which has one vote per share), directly or indirectly
through the Daughter’s LLC and other entities, resulting in
family voting control of approximately 53.8% of our total voting power.
We understand that the Family
intends
to retain ownership
of a
sufficient amount of our
Common Stock and
our Class A
Common
Stock to assure continued ownership of more than 50% of the voting power of
our outstanding shares of capital stock. As a result
of
this ownership,
the
Family has
the
ability
to exert
substantial
influence
over
matters requiring
action
by our
stockholders,
amendments
to our
certificate
of incorporation
and by-laws,
the election
and removal
of directors,
and any
merger,
consolidation,
or
sale of
all or
all of
our
assets,
or
other
transactions.
law
that
the
holders of a majority of the voting power of shares entitled to vote must approve certain fundamental corporate transactions such
as a merger,
consolidation and sale of
all or substantially all
of a corporation’s
assets; accordingly,
such a transaction involving
us
and
requiring
stockholder
cannot
be
effected
without
the
of
the
Family.
Such
ownership
will
make
an
unsolicited acquisition of our Company more difficult and discourage
certain types of transactions involving a change of control
of our Company, including
transactions in which the holders of our Common Stock might otherwise receive a premium for their
shares over then current market prices.
The Family’s controlling
ownership of our capital stock may adversely
affect the market
price of our Common Stock.
For
refer
to
Exhibit
4.1
to
this
Annual
Report
on
Form
10-K,
“Description
of
Registrant’s
Registered Under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.”
The
price
of
our
Common
Stock
may
be
affected
by
the
of
shares
for
sale
in
the
market,
and
you
may
experience significant dilution as a result of future issuances
of our securities, which could materially and
the market price of our Common Stock.
The sale or
availability for
sale of substantial
amounts of
Stock could adversely
impact its price.
The Daughters’
LLC holds approximately 1.1
million shares of
Common Stock (the “Subject
Shares”) that are
subject to an
Agreement Regarding
Common Stock (the “Agreement”) filed as an exhibit to this report. The Subject Shares remain subject to potential sale
Agreement. The Agreement
generally provides that
if a holder of
Subject Shares intends
to sell any of
the Subject Shares,
such
party must give the
Company a right of first
refusal to purchase all or
any of such shares.
The price payable by
the Company to
purchase shares
pursuant to
the exercise
of the
right of
first refusal
will reflect
a 6%
discount to
the then-current
market price
based
on
the
business-day
volume-weighted
average
price.
If
the
Company
does
not exercise
its right
of
first
refusal
and
purchase the shares offered, such party will, subject to the approval of a special committee of independent directors of the
Board
of Directors, be
permitted to sell
the shares not
purchased by the
Company pursuant to
a Company registration
statement, Rule
144 under the Securities Act of 1933, or another manner of sale agreed to by the Company. Although pursuant
to the Agreement
will have a
right of first
refusal to purchase
all or any
of those shares,
may elect not
to exercise its
rights
of
first
refusal,
and
if so
such
shares
would
be
eligible for
sale pursuant
to
the registration
rights
in
the
or
to
Rule
under
the Securities
Act
of
Sales, or
the
for
sale, of
a
large
number
of
our
Common Stock could result in a decline in the market price of our Common
Stock.
In addition,
our articles
of incorporation
authorize us
to issue
120,000,000 shares
of our
Common Stock.
As of
June 1,
2024,
there were
44,238,766 shares
of our
outstanding. Accordingly,
a substantial
Stock
are
and
are,
or
could
become,
for
sale
in
the
market.
In
we
may
be
obligated
to
issue
shares of our Common Stock in connection with employee benefit plans (including
equity incentive plans).
In the
future, we
may decide
to raise
capital through
offerings of
Stock, additional
securities convertible
into or
exchangeable for Common
Stock, or rights to acquire
these securities or our Common
Stock. We
may also issue such securities
as consideration in an
acquisition. The issuance of
such securities could result
in dilution of
existing stockholders’ equity interests
in us. Issuances of substantial
amounts of our Common
Stock, or the perception that
such issuances could occur,
may adversely
affect prevailing market prices for our Common Stock, and we
cannot predict the effect this dilution may have on
the price of our
Common Stock.
LEGAL AND REGULATORY
Pressure from animal rights groups regarding the treatment of animals may subject us to additional costs to conform our
practices
to
comply
with
developing
or
subject
us
to
costs
to
defend
challenges
to
our
current
practices and protect our
image with our customers.
In particular,
changes in customer preferences
and state legislation
have accelerated an increase in demand for cage-free eggs, which increases uncertainty
in our business and increases our
costs.
We and many of our customers face pressure from animal rights groups, such
as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
and
the Humane
Society of
the United States,
to require
companies that supply
food products
to operate
their business in
a manner
that
treats
animals
in
conformity
with
certain
developed
or
by
these
groups.
In
general,
we
may
incur
additional costs to conform our practices to address
these standards or to defend our existing
practices and protect our image with
our customers.
The standards promoted
by these groups
change over time,
but typically
require minimum
cage space
for hens,
among other requirements, and some
of these groups have led successful
legislative efforts to ban
any form of caged housing
in
various states.
As
discussed
in
Part I. Item 1. Business - Government Regulation
,
ten
states
have
passed
minimum
space
and/or
for hens,
states are
considering such
requirements. In
addition, a
our customers
have announced goals to either exclusively offer cage-free eggs or significantly increase the volume of cage-free
egg sales in the
future, subject in most cases to availability of supply, affordability and
consumer demand, among other contingencies. While we
anticipate that our
retail and foodservice
customers will continue
to transition to
selling cage-free eggs
given publicly stated
goals,
no assurance
that this
transition will
take place
or take
place according
to the
timeline of
current cage-free
goals. For
example, customers may accelerate their transition to stocking cage-free eggs, which may challenge our ability to meet the cage-
free volume
needs of
those customers
and result
in a loss
egg sales.
Similarly,
customers who
commit to
stock greater
proportional quantities of cage-free eggs are under no obligation to continue to do
so, which may result in an oversupply of
cage-
free eggs and result
in lower specialty
egg prices,
which could reduce the
return on our capital
investment in cage-free production.
Changing our
infrastructure and
operating procedures
to conform
to consumer
preferences, customer
demands and
recent laws
has resulted
and will
continue to
additional costs,
including capital
and operating
cost increases.
The USDA
reported
that the
estimated U.S.
cage-free flock
was 122.0 million hens
as of
May 31,
2024, which
is approximately
39.9% of
the total
U.S. table
egg
layer hen
population.
to the
USDA Agricultural
Marketing
Service, as
of May
2024 approximately
220.1 million hens, or about
72% of the U.S.
non-organic laying flock would have to be
in cage-free production to meet
cage-free commitments
from the
retailers, foodservice
providers and
food manufacturers
that have
stated goals
to transition
to
cage-free eggs.
In response
to our
customers’ announced
goals and
increased legal
requirements for
cage-free eggs,
we have
increased capital
expenditures
to
our
capacity.
We
are
also
enhancing
our
focus
on
when
considering
acquisition opportunities.
Our customers
typically do
not commit
to long-term
purchases of
specific quantities
or
type of eggs
with us, and
as a result,
we cannot predict
with any certainty
which types of
eggs they will
require us to
supply in
future
periods.
The
of
eggs
is
more
costly
than
the
of
eggs,
and
these
higher
production costs contribute
to the prices
of cage-free eggs,
which historically have
typically been higher
than conventional egg
prices. Many consumers prefer to buy less expensive conventional shell eggs. These consumer preferences may in turn influence
our customers’ future needs for
cage-free and conventional eggs. Due
to these uncertainties, we
may over-estimate future demand
eggs, which
could increase
our costs
unnecessarily,
or we
may under-estimate
future demand
eggs,
which could
harm us
competitively.
If our
competitors obtain
non-cancelable
long-term contracts
to provide
cage-free eggs
to
our existing or potential customers,
then there may be decreased demand
for our cage-free eggs due
to these lost potential sales.
If we and our
competitors increase cage-free egg production
and there is no
commensurate increase in demand for
cage-free eggs,
this overproduction
could lead to
an oversupply of
cage-free eggs, reducing
the sales price
for specialty eggs
and our return
on
capital investments in cage-free production.
Failure
to
comply
with
governmental
environmental
could
harm
our
operating results,
financial condition,
and reputation.
Further,
we may
incur significant
costs to
comply with
any such
regulations.
We are subject to federal, state and local
regulations relating to grading, quality
control, labeling, sanitary control, waste
areas of
our business.
As a
fully-integrated
producer,
our shell
egg facilities
are subject
to regulation
and
inspection by the USDA, OSHA, EPA and
FDA, as well as state and local health and agricultural agencies, among others. All of
our shell egg production and
feed mill facilities are subject
to FDA, EPA and OSHA regulation and inspections. In addition, rules
are often proposed that, if adopted as proposed, could increase our costs.
Our operations and facilities are subject to various federal, state and local environmental, health, and safety laws and regulations
governing,
among
other
things,
the
generation,
storage,
handling,
use,
transportation,
and
of
hazardous
materials. Under these laws and
regulations, we are required to obtain permits
from governmental authorities, including, but
not
limited to wastewater discharge permits and manure
and litter land applications.
If we
fail to
comply with
applicable laws
or regulations,
or fail
to obtain
necessary permits,
we could
be subject
to significant
fines and penalties or other sanctions, our reputation could be harmed, and our operating results and financial condition could be
affected.
In
because
these
are
becoming
increasingly
more
stringent,
it is
possible that we will be required to incur significant costs for compliance
with such laws and regulations in the future.
Climate change and legal or regulatory responses
may have an adverse impact on our business and results of
Extreme
weather
events,
such
as derechos,
wildfires,
drought,
tornadoes,
hurricanes,
storms,
floods
or
other
natural
disasters
could materially and adversely affect our operating
results and financial condition. In fact, derechos, fires, floods,
tornadoes and
hurricanes have affected our facilities or the facilities of other egg producers in the past. Increased global temperatures
and more
frequent occurrences
of extreme
weather events,
which may
be exacerbated
by climate
change, may
cause crop
and livestock
areas to
become unsuitable,
including due
to water
scarcity or
high or
unpredictable
temperatures,
which may
much
greater stress on food systems and more pronounced food
insecurity globally. Lower
global crop production, including corn and
the primary
feed ingredients
that support
the health of
our animals,
in significantly
higher
prices for these commodity inputs, impact our ability to source the commodities we use to feed our flocks, and negatively impact
to maintain
or grow our
operations. Climate
change may
increasingly expose
workers and
animals to
high heat
and
humidity
stressors
that
impact
poultry
and
our
costs.
Increased
greenhouse
gas
emissions
may
also
negatively impact air quality, soil quality and water quality, which
may hamper our ability to support our operations, particularly
in higher water- and soil-stressed regions.
Increasing
frequency of
severe weather
events, whether
tied to
climate change
or any
other cause,
may negatively
impact our
ability to raise
poultry and
produce eggs profitably
or to
operate our transportation
and logistics
supply chains. Regulatory
and
market
pricing may
to drive
the costs
of fossil
-based
fuels higher,
which
could negatively
impact
to
source commodities
necessary to
operate our
farms or
plants and
our current
fleet of
vehicles. These
changes may
cause us
to
change, significantly, our day-to-day
business operations and our strategy. Climate change and extreme weather events may also
impact demand for our products
given evolution of consumer food preferences.
Even if we take
measures to position our business
in anticipation
of such
changes, future
compliance
with legal
or regulatory
requirements may
require significant
time, oversight and enterprise expense. We
may also incur significant expense tied to regulatory fines if laws and regulations are
interpreted and applied
in a manner that
is inconsistent with our
business practices. We
can make no
assurances that our efforts
to prepare
for these
adverse events
will be
in line
with future
market and
regulatory expectations
and our
access to
capital
to
support our business may also be adversely impacted.
Current and future litigation could expose us to significant
liabilities and adversely affect our business reputation.
We and certain of our subsidiaries are involved in various legal proceedings.
Litigation is inherently unpredictable, and although
we
believe
we
have
meaningful
defenses
in
these
matters,
we
may
incur
due
to
adverse
judgments
or
enter
into
settlements of claims that
could have a material
adverse effect on our
results of operations, cash
flow and financial condition.
For
a
discussion
of
our
ongoing
legal
see
Part I. Item 3. Legal Proceedings
below
and
Part
II.
Item
Notes
to
the
Consolidated Financial
.
Such lawsuits are
expensive to
defend, divert
attention, and
may
adverse judgments
or settlements.
may expose
us to
negative publicity,
which could adversely affect our business reputation and customer
preference for our products and brands.
FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC RISK FACTORS
Weak or unstable economic conditions, including continued high inflation and interest rates,
could negatively impact our
Weak
or unstable economic
conditions, including
continued high inflation
and interest rates,
may adversely
affect our
by:
Limiting our access to capital markets or increasing the cost of capital we may
need to grow or operate our business;
Changing consumer spending and habits and demand for eggs, particularly
higher-priced eggs;
Restricting the supply of energy sources or increasing our cost to procure
energy; or
Reducing the availability of feed
ingredients, packaging material, and other raw
materials, or increasing the cost
items.
Deterioration of economic conditions could also negatively
impact:
The financial condition of our suppliers, which may make it more
difficult for them to supply raw materials;
The financial condition of our customers, which may decrease demand
for eggs or increase our bad debt expense; or
The financial condition of our insurers, which could increase our cost to obtain insurance, and/or make it difficult for or
insurers to meet their obligations in the event we experience a loss due to an insured
peril.
to
the
U.S.
Bureau
of
Labor
Statistics,
from
May
to
May
2022,
the
Consumer
Price Index for
All
Urban
Consumers (“CPI-U”) increased
8.5 percent, the largest
12-month increase since
the period ending December
- The CPI-U
increased 4.1% and
3.3% from May
2022 to May
2023 and May
2023 to May
2024, respectively. Inflationary costs have
our input costs, and if we are unable to pass these costs through to the customer
it could have an adverse effect on our business.
We
hold
cash balances
in deposit
accounts with
deposits in
excess of
the amounts
insured by
the Federal
Deposit
Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). In
the event of
a bank failure
at an institution
where we maintain
deposits in excess
of the FDIC-
insured amount, we may lose such excess deposits.
The
loss
of
any
registered
trademark
or
other
intellectual
property
could
enable
other
to
compete
more
effectively with us.
We
utilize intellectual
property in
our business. For
example, we
own the
trademarks
Farmhouse Eggs®
,
4Grain®, Sunups®
,
and
. We
produce and market
Best®
and
Land O’ Lakes
® under license
agreements with EB. We
have invested a significant amount of
money in establishing and promoting
our trademarked brands. The loss or
expiration of any
intellectual property could
enable our competitors
to compete more
effectively with us
by allowing them
to make and
sell products
similar
to
those
we
offer. This
could
negatively
impact
our
ability
to
produce
and
sell
those
products,
thereby
adversely affecting our operations.
Impairment in the carrying value
of goodwill or other assets
could negatively affect our results of
operations or net worth.
the
excess
of
the
cost
of
over
the
fair
value
of
the
net
assets
acquired. Goodwill
is
reviewed
at
least
for
by
assessing
qualitative
factors
to
whether
the
existence of events or circumstances
leads to a determination that
it is more likely than not
that the fair value of
a reporting unit
is less
than its
amount. As of
June 1,
had $45.8 million
of goodwill. While
the current
value of this goodwill is not impaired, future goodwill impairment charges could adversely affect our results of operations in any
particular period and our net worth.
Events beyond our control such as extreme
weather and natural disasters could negatively impact our business.
Fire,
bioterrorism,
pandemics,
extreme
weather
or natural
disasters, including
droughts,
floods,
excessive
cold
or
heat, water
rights restrictions, hurricanes or other storms, could impair the health or growth of our flocks, decrease production or availability
of feed ingredients, or interfere
with our operations due to
power outages, fuel shortages, discharges from
overtopped or breached
wastewater treatment lagoons, damage to our production and processing facilities, labor shortages or disruption of transportation
channels, among other things. Any of these factors could have a material adverse
effect on our financial results.
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.