G III APPAREL GROUP LTD /DE/

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

As used in these financial statements, the term “Company” or “G-III” refers to G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. and its subsidiaries. The Company designs, sources, distributes and markets an extensive range of apparel, including outerwear, dresses, sportswear, suit separates, athleisure, jeans, swimwear, as well as handbags, footwear, small leather goods, cold weather accessories and luggage. The Company also operates retail stores and licenses its proprietary brands under several product categories.

The Company consolidates the accounts of its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. The Company’s DKNY and Donna Karan business in China is operated by Fabco Holding B.V. (“Fabco”), a Dutch joint venture limited liability company that was 75% owned by the Company through April 16, 2024 and was treated as a consolidated majority-owned subsidiary. Effective April 17, 2024, the Company acquired the remaining 25% interest in Fabco that it did not previously own and, as a result, Fabco began being treated as a wholly-owned subsidiary. AWWG Investments B.V. (“AWWG”) is a Dutch corporation that was 12.1% owned by the Company from May 3, 2024 through July 18, 2024 and was accounted for using the cost method of accounting. Effective July 19, 2024, the Company acquired an additional 6.6% minority interest in AWWG, increasing its total ownership interest to 18.7% and, as a result, AWWG began being accounted for under the equity method of accounting. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Karl Lagerfeld Holding B.V. (“KLH”), a Dutch limited liability company that is wholly-owned by the Company, Vilebrequin International SA (“Vilebrequin”), a Swiss corporation that is wholly-owned by the Company, Sonia Rykiel, a Swiss corporation that is wholly-owned by the Company, AWWG and certain other subsidiaries of the Company report results on a calendar year basis rather than on the January 31 fiscal year basis used by the Company. Accordingly, the results of KLH, Vilebrequin, Sonia Rykiel, AWWG and certain other subsidiaries of the Company are included in the financial statements for the quarter ended or ending closest to the Company’s fiscal quarter end. For example, with respect to the Company’s results for the six-month period ended July 31, 2025, the results of KLH, Vilebrequin, Sonia Rykiel, AWWG and certain other subsidiaries of the Company are included for the six-month period ended June 30, 2025. The Company’s retail operations segment reports on a 52/53 week fiscal year. For fiscal 2026 and 2025, the three and six-month periods for the retail operations segment were each 13-week and 26-week periods, respectively, and ended on August 2, 2025 and August 3, 2024, respectively.

The results for the three and six months ended July 31, 2025 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the entire fiscal year, given the seasonal nature of the Company’s business. The accompanying financial statements included herein are unaudited. All adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim period presented have been reflected.

The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2025 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign operations, where the functional currency is not the U.S. dollar (reporting currency), are translated from the foreign currency into U.S. dollars at period-end rates, while income and expenses are translated at the weighted-average exchange rates for the period. The related translation adjustments are reflected as a foreign currency translation adjustment in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within stockholders’ equity.

NOTE 2 – ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS

The Company’s financial instruments consist of trade receivables arising from revenue transactions in the ordinary course of business. The Company considers its trade receivables to consist oftwo portfolio segments: wholesale and retail trade receivables. Wholesale trade receivables result from credit the Company has extended to its wholesale customers based on pre-defined criteria and are generally due within 60 days. Retail trade receivables primarily relate to amounts due from third-party credit card processors for the settlement of debit and credit card transactions and are typically collected within 3 to 5 days.

The Company’s accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts as of July 31, 2025, July 31, 2024 and January 31, 2025 were:

The allowance for doubtful accounts for wholesale trade receivables is estimated based on several factors. In circumstances where the Company is aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations (such as in the case of bankruptcy filings (including potential bankruptcy filings), extensive delay in payment or substantial downgrading by credit rating agencies), a specific reserve for bad debt is recorded against amounts due from that customer to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount reasonably expected to be collected. For all other wholesale customers, an allowance for doubtful accounts is determined through analysis of the aging of accounts receivable at the end of the reporting period for financial statements, assessments of collectability based on historical trends and an evaluation of the impact of economic conditions. The Company considers both current and forecasted future economic conditions in determining the adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts.

The allowance for doubtful accounts for retail trade receivables is estimated at the credit card chargeback rate applied to the previous 90 days of credit card sales. In addition, the Company considers both current and forecasted future economic conditions in determining the adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts.

During the six months ended July 31, 2025, accounts receivable balances of $8.4 million were deemed uncollectable and written off against the allowance primarily due to the bankruptcy of certain customers within the Company’s wholesale operations segment, including Hudson’s Bay Company.

The Company had the following activity in its allowance for doubtful accounts:

NOTE 3 – INVENTORIES

Wholesale inventories, which comprise a significant portion of the Company’s inventory, are stated at the lower of cost (determined by the first-in, first-out method) or net realizable value. Retail and Vilebrequin inventories are stated at the lower of cost (determined by the weighted average method) or net realizable value. Substantially all of the Company’s inventories consist of finished goods.

The inventory return asset, which consists of the amount of goods that are anticipated to be returned by customers, was $7.2 million, $6.5 million and $13.2 million as of July 31, 2025, July 31, 2024 and January 31, 2025, respectively. The inventory return asset is recorded within prepaid expenses and other current assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Inventory held on consignment by the Company’s customers totaled $5.1 million, $4.7 million and $5.9 million at July 31, 2025, July 31, 2024 and January 31, 2025, respectively. The Company reflects this inventory on its condensed consolidated balance sheets.

NOTE 4 – FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles establish a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The determination of the applicable level within the hierarchy for a particular asset or liability depends on the inputs used in its valuation as of the measurement date, notably the extent to which the inputs are market-based (observable) or internally-derived (unobservable). A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:

The following table summarizes the carrying values and the estimated fair values of the Company’s debt instruments:

The Company’s debt instruments are recorded at their carrying values in its condensed consolidated balance sheets, which may differ from their respective fair values. The carrying amount of the Company’s variable rate debt approximates the fair value, as interest rates change with market rates. Furthermore, the carrying value of all other financial instruments potentially subject to valuation risk (principally consisting of cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable) also approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these accounts.

Non-Financial Assets and Liabilities

The Company’s non-financial assets that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include long-lived assets, which consist primarily of property and equipment and operating lease assets. The Company reviews these assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be fully recoverable. For assets that are not recoverable, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the difference between the carrying amount of the asset or asset group and its estimated fair value. For operating lease assets, the Company determines the fair value of the assets by discounting the estimated market rental rates over the remaining term of the lease. These fair value measurements are considered level 3 measurements in the fair value hierarchy. During fiscal 2025, the Company recorded a$0.8 million impairment charge primarily related to leasehold improvements and furniture and fixtures at certain retail stores as a result of their performance.

NOTE 5 – LEASES

The Company leases retail stores, warehouses, distribution centers, office space and certain equipment. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet. The Company recognizes lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Most leases are for a term ofone toten years. Some leases include one or more options torenew, with renewal terms that can extend the lease term fromone toten years. Several of the Company’s retail store leases include an option to terminate the lease based on failure to achieve a specified sales volume. The exercise of lease renewal options is generally at the Company’s sole discretion. The exercise of lease termination options is generally by mutual agreement between the Company and the lessor.

Certain of the Company’s lease agreements include contingent rental payments based on a percentage of retail sales over contractual levels and others include rental payments adjusted periodically for inflation. Contingent rent is accrued each period as the liabilities are incurred. The Company’s leases do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.

The Company’s operating lease assets and liabilities as of July 31, 2025, July 31, 2024 and January 31, 2025 consist of the following:

The Company recorded lease costs of $17.8 million and $36.0 million during the three and six months ended July 31, 2025. The Company recorded lease costs of $18.0 million and $36.2 million during the three and six months ended July 31, 2024. Lease costs are recorded within selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. The Company recorded variable lease costs and short-term lease costs of $4.4 million and $7.9 million for the three and six months ended July 31, 2025. The Company recorded variable lease costs and short-term lease costs of $5.8 million and $11.1 million for the three and six months ended July 31, 2024. Short-term lease costs are immaterial.

As of July 31, 2025, the Company’s maturity of operating lease liabilities in the years ending up to January 31, 2030 and thereafter are as follows:

As of July 31, 2025, there are no material leases that are legally binding but have not yet commenced.

As of July 31, 2025, the weighted average remaining lease term related to operating leases is 6.5 years. The weighted average discount rate related to operating leases is 6.4%.

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities was $38.2 million and $38.0 million during the six months ended July 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations were $26.8 million and $16.1 million during the six months ended July 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

NOTE 6 – NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

Basic net income per common share has been computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted net income per share, when applicable, is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and potential dilutive common shares, consisting of unvested restricted stock unit awards outstanding during the period. Approximately 43,000 and 34,500 shares of common stock have been excluded from the diluted net income per share calculation for the three and six months ended July 31, 2025. A nominal amount of shares of common stock have been excluded from the diluted net income per share calculation for the three and six months ended July 31, 2024. All share-based payments outstanding that vest based on the achievement of performance conditions, and for which the respective performance conditions have not been achieved, have been excluded from the diluted per share calculation.

The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators used in the calculation of basic and diluted net income per share:

NOTE 7 – NOTES PAYABLE

Long-term debt consists of the following:

Senior Secured Notes

The Company had previously completed a private debt offering of $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Senior Secured Notes due August 2025 (the “Notes”).

In August 2024, the Company used cash on hand and borrowings from its revolving credit facility to make a $400.7 million payment to voluntarily redeem the entire $400.0 million principal amount of the Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest. At the date of redemption, the Company had unamortized debt issuance costs of $1.6 million associated with the Notes. These debt issuance costs were fully extinguished and charged to interest expense in the Company’s results of operations.

Third Amended and Restated ABL Credit Agreement

On June 4, 2024, the Company’s subsidiaries, G-III Leather Fashions, Inc., Riviera Sun, Inc., AM Retail Group, Inc. and The Donna Karan Company Store LLC (collectively, the “Borrowers”), entered into the third amended and restated credit agreement (the “Third ABL Credit Agreement”) with the lenders named therein and with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent. The Third ABL Credit Agreement is afive-year senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility providing for borrowings in an aggregate principal amount of up to $700.0 million. The Company and certain of its wholly-

owned domestic subsidiaries, as well as G-III Apparel Canada ULC (collectively, the “Guarantors”), are guarantors under the Third ABL Credit Agreement.

The Third ABL Credit Agreement amends and restates the Second Amended Credit Agreement, dated as of August 7, 2020 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time prior to June 4, 2024, the “Second Credit Agreement”), by and among the Borrowers and the Guarantors, the lenders from time-to-time party thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., in its capacity as the administrative agent thereunder. The Second Credit Agreement provided for borrowings of up to $650.0 million and was due to expire on August 7, 2025. The Third ABL Credit Agreement extends the maturity date to June 2029, subject to a springing maturity date as defined within the credit agreement.

Amounts available under the Third ABL Credit Agreement are subject to borrowing base formulas and overadvances as specified in the Third ABL Credit Agreement. Borrowings bear interest, at the Borrowers’ option, at Adjusted Term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) plus a margin of 1.50% to 2.00%, or the alternate base rate plus a margin of 0.50% to 1.00% (defined as the greatest of (i) the “prime rate” of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. from time to time, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.5% and (iii) SOFR for a borrowing with an interest period of one month plus 1.00%), with the applicable margin determined based on the Borrowers’ average daily availability under the Third ABL Credit Agreement. As of July 31, 2025, interest under the Third ABL Credit Agreement was being paid at an average rate of 8.0% per annum.

The Third ABL Credit Agreement is secured by specified assets of the Borrowers and the Guarantors. In addition to paying interest on any outstanding borrowings under the Third ABL Credit Agreement, the Company is required to pay a commitment fee to the lenders under the credit agreement with respect to the unutilized commitments. The commitment fee accrues at a tiered rate equal to 0.375% per annum on the average daily amount of the available commitments when the average usage is less than 50% of the total available commitments and decreases to 0.25% per annum on the average daily amount of the available commitments when the average usage is greater than or equal to 50% of the total available commitments.

The Third ABL Credit Agreement contains covenants that, among other things, restrict the Company’s ability to, subject to specified exceptions, incur additional debt; incur liens; sell or dispose of certain assets; merge with other companies; liquidate or dissolve the Company; acquire other companies; make loans, advances, or guarantees; and make certain investments. In certain circumstances, the revolving credit facility also requires the Company to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined in the agreement, not less than 1.00 to 1.00 for each period of twelve consecutive fiscal months of the Company. As of July 31, 2025, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.

As of July 31, 2025, the Company hadno borrowings outstanding under the Third ABL Credit Agreement. The Third ABL Credit Agreement also includes amounts available for letters of credit. As of July 31, 2025, there were $0.6 million outstanding trade letters of credit and $2.6 million of standby letters of credit.

At the date of the refinancing of the Second ABL Credit Agreement, the Company had $1.8 million of unamortized debt issuance costs remaining from the Second ABL Credit Agreement. There wasno extinguishment of any amount of the unamortized debt issuance costs remaining from the Second ABL Credit Agreement. The Company incurred new debt issuance costs totaling $3.8 million related to the Third ABL Credit Agreement. The Company has a total of $5.6 million debt issuance costs related to its Third ABL Credit Agreement. As permitted under ASC 835, the debt issuance costs have been deferred and are presented as an asset which is amortized ratably over the term of the Third ABL Credit Agreement.

Unsecured Loans

Several of the Company’s foreign entities borrow funds under various unsecured loans to provide funding for operations in the normal course of business. In the aggregate, the Company is currently required to make quarterly installment payments of principal in the amount of €0.8 million under these loans. Interest on the outstanding principal amount of the loans accrues at a fixed rate equal to 0% to 5.0% per annum, payable on either a quarterly or monthly basis. As of July 31, 2025, the Company had an aggregate outstanding balance of €4.4 million ($5.2 million) under these unsecured loans.

Overdraft Facilities

Certain of the Company’s foreign entities entered into overdraft facilities that allow for applicable bank accounts to be in a negative position up to a certain maximum overdraft. These uncommitted overdraft facilities with HSBC Bank allow for an aggregate maximum overdraft of €10 million. Interest on drawn balances accrues at a rate equal to the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (“EURIBOR”) plus a margin of 1.75% per annum, payable quarterly. The facility may be cancelled at any time by the Company or HSBC Bank. Additionally, certain of the Company’s foreign entities entered into overdraft facilities with UBS Bank in Switzerland for an aggregate of CHF 4.7 million at varying interest rates of 0% to 0.5%. As of July 31, 2025, the Company had an aggregate of €3.5 million ($4.1 million) drawn under these various facilities.

Foreign Credit Facilities

KLH has a credit agreement with ABN AMRO Bank N.V. with a credit limit of €15.0 million which is secured by specified assets of KLH. Borrowings bear interest at the EURIBOR plus a margin of 1.7%. A subsidiary of Vilebrequin has a credit agreement with CIC Bank with a credit limit of €5.0 million. Borrowings bear interest at the Euro Short-Term Rate plus a margin of 1.75%. As of July 31, 2025, the Company had an aggregate of €5.3 million ($6.2 million) drawn under these credit facilities.

NOTE 8 – SUPPLY CHAIN FINANCE PROGRAM

The Company has a voluntary supply chain finance program (the “SCF Program”) administered through a third-party platform. The Company’s payment obligations confirmed under the SCF Program are due to a financial intermediary that will remit payment to the Company’s suppliers. The SCF Program also provides participating suppliers with the option to sell their receivables due from the Company, at their sole discretion, to a third-party financial institution at terms negotiated between the supplier and the financial institution. The Company is not a party to the agreements between the suppliers and the financial institution. The Company’s payment obligations to its suppliers, including the amounts due and payment terms, which generally do not exceed 75 days, are not impacted by a suppliers’ participation in the SCF Program. There are no assets pledged as security or other forms of guarantees provided specifically under the SCF Program, however the obligations under the SCF Program benefit from guarantees and collateral provided under our revolving credit facility to which the financial institutions involved in the SCF Program are a party to.

The Company’s outstanding payment obligations under its SCF Program are recorded within accounts payable in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets and the corresponding payments are reflected in cash flows from operating activities within the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. As of July 31, 2025, the Company had $205.3 million of payment obligations outstanding under the SCF Program. During the three and six months ended July 31, 2025, the Company settled obligations of $89.8 million and $131.6 million through the SCF Program, respectively.

The following supply chain finance program activity is presented for the six-month period indicated below:

NOTE 9 – REVENUE RECOGNITION

Disaggregation of Revenue

In accordance with ASC 606 –Revenue from Contracts with Customers, the Company discloses its revenues by segment. Each segment presents its own characteristics with respect to the timing of revenue recognition and the type of customer. In addition, disaggregating revenues using a segment basis is consistent with how the Company’s Chief Operating Decision

Maker manages the Company. The Company has identified the wholesale operations segment and the retail operations segment as distinct sources of revenue.

*Wholesale Operations Segment.*Wholesale revenues include sales of products to retailers under owned, licensed and private label brands, as well as sales related to the Karl Lagerfeld and Vilebrequin businesses, including from retail stores operated by Karl Lagerfeld and Vilebrequin, other than sales of product under the Karl Lagerfeld Paris brand generated by the Company’s retail stores and digital platforms. Wholesale revenues from sales of products are recognized when control transfers to the customer. The Company considers control to have been transferred when the Company has transferred physical possession of the product, the Company has a right to payment for the product, the customer has legal title to the product and the customer has the significant risks and rewards of the product. Wholesale revenues are adjusted by variable consideration arising from implicit or explicit obligations. Wholesale revenues also include revenues from license agreements related to trademarks associated with the Company’s owned brands. As of July 31, 2025, revenues from license agreements related to trademarks associated with the Company’s owned brands represented an insignificant portion of wholesale revenues.

*Retail Operations Segment.*Retail store revenues are generated by direct sales to consumers through company-operated stores and product sales through the Company’s digital channels for the DKNY, Donna Karan, Karl Lagerfeld Paris, G.H. Bass and Wilsons Leather businesses. Retail stores primarily consist of DKNY and Karl Lagerfeld Paris retail stores, substantially all of which are operated as outlet stores in North America. Retail operations segment revenues are recognized at the point of sale when the customer takes possession of the goods and tenders payment. Digital revenues primarily consist of sales to consumers through the Company’s digital platforms. Digital revenue is recognized when a customer takes possession of the goods. Retail sales are recorded net of applicable sales tax.

Contract Liabilities

The Company’s contract liabilities, which are recorded within accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, primarily consist of gift card liabilities and advance payments from licensees. Total contract liabilities were $5.8 million, $5.1 million and $5.9 million at July 31, 2025, July 31, 2024 and January 31, 2025, respectively. The Company recognized $3.4 million in revenue for the three months ended July 31, 2025 related to contract liabilities that existed at April 30, 2025. The Company recognized $4.5 million in revenue for the six months ended July 31, 2025 related to contract liabilities that existed at January 31, 2025. There wereno contract assets recorded as of July 31, 2025, July 31, 2024 and January 31, 2025. Substantially all of the advance payments from licensees as of July 31, 2025 are expected to be recognized as revenue within the next twelve months.

NOTE 10 – SEGMENTS

The Company’s reportable segments are business units that offer products through different channels of distribution. The Company hastwo reportable segments: wholesale operations and retail operations. The wholesale operations segment includes sales of products to retailers under owned, licensed and private label brands, as well as sales related to the Karl Lagerfeld and Vilebrequin businesses, including from retail stores operated by Karl Lagerfeld and Vilebrequin, other than sales of product under the Karl Lagerfeld Paris brand generated by the Company’s retail stores and digital platforms. Wholesale revenues also include revenues from license agreements related to trademarks associated with the Company’s owned brands. The retail operations segment consists primarily of direct sales to consumers through company-operated stores, which consists primarily of DKNY and Karl Lagerfeld Paris stores, as well as the digital channels for DKNY, Donna Karan, Karl Lagerfeld Paris, G.H. Bass and Wilsons Leather. Substantially all DKNY and Karl Lagerfeld Paris stores are operated as outlet stores in North America.

The Company determines its operating segments based on how the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) views and analyzes each segment’s operations and performance. The Company’s CODM is its Chief Executive Officer. The CODM utilizes operating profit or loss as the measure of segment profit or loss. The CODM uses operating profit or loss to determine resource allocation and operational decisions for matters including, but not limited to, compensation, advertising and facilities needs.

All historical financial segment information has been recast to conform to the new disclosure requirements under Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2023-07, “Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures.”

The following segment information is presented for the three month periods indicated below:

(1)Represents intersegment sales to the Company’s retail operations segment.

(2)Other segment items include design and product development costs, professional fees, office expenses, freight and packaging and other selling, general and administrative expenses.

The total net sales by licensed and proprietary product sales for each of the Company’s reportable segments are as follows:

The Company allocates overhead to its business segments on various bases, which include units shipped, space utilization, inventory levels and relative sales levels, among other factors. The method of allocation has been applied consistently on a period-to-period basis.

The total assets for each of the Company’s reportable segments, as well as assets not allocated to a segment, are as follows:

Capital expenditures during the six months ended July 31, 2025 for the wholesale operations segment and retail operations segment were $17.2 million and $1.2 million, respectively.

NOTE 11 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the three months ended July 31, 2025, the Company issuedno shares of common stock and utilized 63,362 shares of treasury stock in connection with the vesting of equity awards. For the three months ended July 31, 2024, the Company issuedno shares of common stock and utilized 99,585 shares of treasury stock in connection with the vesting of equity awards. For the six months ended July 31, 2025, the Company issuedno shares of common stock and utilized 277,191 shares of treasury stock in connection with the vesting of equity awards. For the six months ended July 31, 2024, the

Company issuedno shares of common stock and utilized 366,714 shares of treasury stock in connection with the vesting of equity awards.

NOTE 12 – LITIGATION WITH PVH CORP.

On June 13, 2025, the Company filed a complaint against PVH Corp. andtwo of its subsidiaries (“Defendants”) in the New York County Commercial Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and tortious interference with contract arising out of the unreasonable denial of the Company’s request to extend the Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger licenses for the women’s suits category for an additional three-year period and other actions taken by Defendants that undermined the Company’s ability to perform under Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger license agreements and subjected the Company to contractual penalties. On July 30, 2025, Calvin Klein, Inc. and Tommy Hilfiger Licensing LLC filed their own complaint against G-III in the same court alleging breaches of the license agreements between the parties. The Company believes that Calvin Klein, Inc. and Tommy Hilfiger Licensing LLC’s complaint is without merit, and the Company intends to vigorously defend against these actions. Due to the uncertainty inherent in any litigation, the Company is unable to estimate any reasonably possible loss, or range of loss, with respect to this matter.

NOTE 13 – RECENT ADOPTED AND ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance

There was no accounting guidance adopted during the three months ended July 31, 2025.

Issued Accounting Guidance Being Evaluated for Adoption

In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2023-09, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures”. The ASU requires public companies to disclose, on an annual basis, a tabular reconciliation of the effective tax rate to the statutory rate for federal, state and foreign income taxes. It also requires greater detail about individual reconciling items in the rate reconciliation to the extent the impact of those items exceeds a specified threshold. In addition, the ASU requires public companies to disclose their income tax payments (net of refunds received), disaggregated between federal, state/local and foreign jurisdictions. ASU 2023-09 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted. The Company expects to adopt this standard in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2026 and is currently evaluating the standard and determining the extent of additional disclosures that may be required.

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, “Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses”. The ASU requires public entities to disclose more detailed information about certain costs and expenses presented in the income statement, including inventory purchases, employee compensation, selling expenses, depreciation and intangible asset amortization. ASU 2024-03 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The amendments in this ASU should be applied prospectively; however, retrospective application is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2024-03 on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.