iBio, Inc.
For the period ended Jun 30, 2025. Filed Sep 5, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Sep 5, 2025
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of iBio, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of iBio, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2025 and 2024, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended June 30, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended June 30, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Impairment of Indefinite-Lived Asset IBIO-101
As disclosed in Note 6 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company acquired an Indefinite-Lived Asset from RubrYc as part of the RubrYc’s Stock Purchase and Asset Acquisition. The RubrYc Indefinite-Lived Asset as fiscal year-end June 30, 2025 and 2024 is $5 million. The Company’s Indefinite-Lived intangible Asset is assessed for impairment annually and/or upon the occurrence of a triggering event. The impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible asset consists of comparing the fair value, which is estimated using the Income Approach-Multi Period Excess Earning
Model, to its carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to such excess. The determination of the fair value is primarily based on discounted future cash flows projected to be generated from the indefinite-lived intangible assets, including the estimates of future revenue, future development costs, the probability of success in various phases of development programs, and potential post-launch cash flows. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impact on either the fair value, the amount of any impairment charges, or both.
Significant judgment is exercised by management when developing the fair value measurement of the indefinite-lived intangible asset. Given these factors, the related audit effort in evaluating management’s judgments of the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible assets was challenging, subjective, and complex and required a high degree of auditor judgment.
How the Critical Audit Matter was addressed in the Audit
Our principal audit procedures related to the Company’s financial reporting relating to potential impairment of the Asset included, among others:
| ● | We audited management’s process for developing the fair value of the Indefinite-Lived Asset. Our procedures entailed testing management’s process for estimating the fair value of intangible assets, which included evaluating the appropriateness of the valuation methods and estimates made by management in developing the prospective financial information (“PFI”) utilized in the underlying data of the valuation model. We performed audit procedures over management’s PFI, which entailed significant assumptions related to future revenue, future development costs, and the probability of success in various phases of development programs as well as post launch cash flows. In evaluating management’s significant assumptions for reasonableness, we considered comparative data from external markets, comparable industry and guideline public companies’ data. |
| ● | We involved our Valuation Specialists to assist in testing the Company’s methodology and significant assumptions utilized in the Company’s impairment assessment. Which entail procedures evaluating the following assumptions (1) Income Approach-Multi Period Excess Earning Model (2) Market Capitalization (3) Discount Rate/Weighted Average Cost of Capital. Moreover, our valuation specialists performed sensitivity analyses over the significant assumptions including the projected upfront payment and the royalty rate to evaluate the Company’s estimated fair value in comparison to the carrying value for reasonableness and gaining an understanding of the qualification of the third-party valuation specialist that prepared the valuation report. |
/s/ GRASSI & Co., CPAs, P.C.
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2024.
Jericho, New York
September 5, 2025
iBio, Inc. and Subsidiaries
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.