ALLIANCE RESOURCE PARTNERS LP

From time to time, we are party to litigation matters incidental to the conduct of our business. It is the opinion of management that the ultimate resolution of our pending litigation matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operation or liquidity. However, we cannot assure you that disputes or litigation will not arise or that we will be able to resolve any such future disputes or litigation in a satisfactory manner. The information under "General Litigation" and "Other" in "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data—Note 21 – Commitments and Contingencies" is incorporated herein by this reference.

Litigation was initiated in November 2019 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky*(Branson v. Webster County Coal, LLC et al.)* against certain of our subsidiaries in which the plaintiffs allege violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and state law due to alleged failure to compensate for time "donning" and "doffing" equipment and to account for certain bonuses in the calculation of overtime rates and pay. A similar lawsuit was initiated in March 2020 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky*(Brewer v. Alliance Coal, LLC, et al.).* Subsequently, four additional lawsuits making similar allegations were initiated against certain of our subsidiaries: filed March 4, 2021 in the Circuit Court for Hopkins County, Kentucky*(Johnson v. Hopkins County Coal, LLC, et al.); filed April 6, 2021 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia(Rettig v. Mettiki Coal WV, LLC, et al.);* filed April 9, 2021 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois*(Cates v. Hamilton County Coal, LLC, et al.); and filed April 13, 2021 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana(Prater v. Gibson County Coal, LLC, et al.).* The plaintiffs in these cases seek class and collective action certification, which we oppose, and the courts have not yet made

definitive final rulings on these issues. The plaintiffs seek to recover alleged compensatory, liquidated and/or exemplary damages for the alleged underpayment, and costs and fees that potentially may be recoverable under applicable law. We believe our ultimate exposure, if any, will not be material to our results of operations or financial position; however, if our current belief as to the merit of the claims in these lawsuits is not upheld, it is reasonably possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters could result in a potential loss that may be material to our results of operations.