Hilltop Holdings Inc

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Hilltop Holdings Inc.

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hilltop Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, and the related consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive income, of stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control*–* Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2023 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Basis for Opinions

The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management's assessment and our audit of Hilltop Holdings Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting also included controls over the preparation of financial statements in accordance with the

instructions to the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (Form FR Y-9C) to comply with the reporting requirements of Section 112 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA). A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the** consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated **financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Allowance for Credit Losses for Loans Held for Investment – Collectively Evaluated

As described in Notes 1** **and 6 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s allowance for credit losses for loans held for investment was $111 million as of December 31, 2023. Management’s allowance for credit losses for collectively evaluated loans is an estimate of expected losses over the lifetime of a loan within the Company’s existing loans held for investment portfolio and is based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The credit loss estimation process considers the characteristics of the Company’s loan portfolio segments, which are further disaggregated into loan classes, the level at which credit risk is monitored. The allowance for credit losses for collectively evaluated loans is calculated using statistical credit factors, including probabilities of default (“PD”) and loss given default (“LGD”), to the amortized cost of pools of loan exposures with similar risk characteristics over its contractual life, adjusted for prepayments, to arrive at an estimate of expected credit losses. As described by management, one of the most significant judgments involved in estimating the Company’s allowance for credit losses relates to the macroeconomic forecasts used to estimate credit losses over the reasonable and supportable forecast period. Management utilizes a single macroeconomic alternative scenario published by a third-party that reflects the U.S. economic outlook. This alternative scenario utilizes multiple economic variables in forecasting the economic outlook. Significant variables that impact the modeled losses across the Company’s loan portfolios are the U.S. Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rates and unemployment rate assumptions. Management also considers adjustments for certain conditions in the Company’s allowance for credit losses estimate qualitatively where they have not been measured directly in management’s collective assessments.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the allowance for credit losses for collectively evaluated loans held for investment is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management in estimating the allowance for credit losses, which in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence relating to management’s determination of the impact of GDP growth rate and unemployment rate forecasts within the macroeconomic alternative scenario, as well as qualitative adjustments to the allowance for credit losses; and (ii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the allowance for credit losses for collectively evaluated loans held for investment, which included controls over evaluation and selection of the variables used in the macroeconomic alternative scenario as well as qualitative adjustments. These procedures also included, among others, the involvement of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in testing management’s process for estimating the allowance for credit losses, which included (i) evaluating the appropriateness of the methodology and models, (ii) testing the completeness and accuracy of certain data used in the estimate, (iii) evaluating the reasonableness of management’s determination of the impact of GDP growth rate and unemployment rate forecasts within the macroeconomic alternative scenario and (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of qualitative adjustments to the allowance for credit losses.

Valuation of Mortgage Servicing Rights

As described in Notes 1, 3 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company measures its residential mortgage servicing rights asset at fair value, which totaled $97 million as of December 31, 2023. Management estimates the fair value of residential mortgage servicing rights by valuing the projected net servicing cash flows, which are then discounted to estimate fair value using a discounted cash flow model. The significant unobservable inputs related to the valuation of residential mortgage servicing rights are the discount rate and the constant prepayment rate assumptions. As disclosed by management, the model assumptions and the mortgage servicing rights fair value estimates are compared to observable trades of similar portfolios as well as to broker valuations and industry surveys, as available.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the valuation of mortgage servicing rights is a critical audit matter are (i) the significant judgment by management in estimating the fair value of residential mortgage servicing rights, which in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence relating to management’s estimate of the fair value of mortgage servicing rights and the constant prepayment rate and discount rate assumptions used in the estimate, and (ii) the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the valuation of mortgage servicing rights, which included controls over the constant prepayment rate and discount rate assumptions. These procedures also included, among others, the involvement of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in testing management’s process for estimating the valuation of mortgage servicing rights, which included (i) evaluating the appropriateness of the methodology, (ii) testing the completeness and accuracy of certain data used in the estimate, (iii) evaluating the reasonableness of the constant prepayment rate and discount rate assumptions used in the estimate and (iv) evaluating the reasonableness of the fair value of mortgage servicing rights, which included comparison to observable trades of similar portfolios and industry surveys.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Dallas, Texas

February 14, 2024

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1998.