FIRST COMMUNITY CORP /SC/

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1 -Nature of Business and Basis of Presentation

Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets, and the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows of First Community Corporation (the “Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, First Community Bank (the “Bank”) (collectively, the “Company”) present fairly in all material respects the Company’s financial position at September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, and the Company’s results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2025.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to fairly present the consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations have been made. All such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The consolidated financial statements and notes thereto are presented in accordance with the instructions for Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q. The information included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 should be referred to in connection with these unaudited interim financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

The following is a summary of recent authoritative pronouncements:

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, “Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses.” This ASU was clarified by the January 2025 issuance of ASU 2025-01, “Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Clarifying the Effective Date.” Combined, these ASUs require disaggregated disclosure of income statement expenses for public business entities. The ASUs require new financial statement disclosures in tabular format, disaggregating information about prescribed categories underlying any relevant income statement expense caption. The prescribed categories include, among other things, employee compensation, depreciation, and intangible asset amortization. Additionally, entities must disclose the total amount of selling expenses and, in annual reporting periods, an entity’s definition of selling expenses. Both ASUs are effective for us fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, though early adoption is permitted. The Company is assessing ASU 2024-03 and ASU 2025-01, and their adoption is not expected to have a significant impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Note 2 -Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding during the period, excluding non-vested restricted shares. Dilutive earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding during the period plus the maximum dilutive effect on common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options or vesting of restricted stock units. Stock options and unvested restricted stock units are considered common stock equivalents and are only included in the calculation of dilutive earnings per common share if the effect is dilutive.

The following reconciles the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted earnings per common share computation:

Note 3 -Investment Securities

The amortized cost and estimated fair values of investment securities are summarized below.

AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE:

HELD-TO-MATURITY:

There were no gross realized gains or gross realized losses from the sale of available-for-sale investment securities during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024.

For available-for-sale securities, management evaluates all investments in an unrealized loss position on a quarterly basis, or more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such evaluation. If the Company has the intent to sell the security or it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security, the security is written down to fair value and the entire loss is recorded in earnings.

If either of the above criteria is not met, the Company evaluates whether the decline in fair value is the result of credit losses or other factors. In making the assessment, the Company may consider various factors including the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, performance on any underlying collateral, downgrades in the ratings of the security by a rating agency, the failure of the issuer to make scheduled interest or principal payments and adverse conditions specifically related to the security. If the assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected are compared to the amortized cost basis of the security and any excess is recorded as an allowance for credit loss, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. Any amount of unrealized loss that has not been recorded through an allowance for credit loss is recognized in other comprehensive income.

Changes in the allowance for credit loss are recorded as provision for (or release of) credit loss expense. Losses are charged against the allowance for credit loss when management believes an available-for-sale security is confirmed to be uncollectible or when either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met. At September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, there was no allowance for credit loss related to the available-for-sale securities portfolio.

The following tables show gross unrealized losses and fair values of available-for-sale securities for which an allowance for credit losses has not been recorded, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position, as of September 30, 2025.

The following table shows gross unrealized losses by fair values of available-for-sale securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position as of December 31, 2024.

The following table shows a roll forward of the allowance for credit losses on held to maturity securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024.

At September 30, 2025, the Company had no securities held-to-maturity that were past due 30 days or more as to principal or interest payments. The Company had no securities held-to-maturity classified as non-accrual at September 30, 2025.

Management measures expected credit losses on held-to-maturity debt securities on a collective basis by major security type. The held-to-maturity portfolio consists of mortgage-backed and municipal securities. Securities are generally rated BBB- or higher. Securities are analyzed individually to establish an allowance for credit losses on held-to-maturity securities.

The estimate of expected credit losses is primarily based on the ratings assigned to the securities by debt rating agencies and the average of the annual historical loss rates associated with those ratings. The Company then multiplies those loss rates, as adjusted for any modifications to reflect current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts as considered necessary, by the remaining lives of each individual security to arrive at a lifetime expected loss amount. Management classifies the held-to-maturity portfolio into the following major security types: mortgage-backed securities or state and local governments.

All the mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) held by the Company are issued by government-sponsored corporations. These securities are either explicitly or implicitly guaranteed by the U.S. government, are highly rated by major rating agencies and have a long history of no credit losses. As a result, no allowance for credit losses was recorded on held-to-maturity MBS as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024. The state and local governments securities held by the Company are highly rated by major rating agencies.

The Company monitors the credit quality of the debt securities held to maturity through the use of credit ratings (Moody’s) on a quarterly basis. In the event that Moody’s does not provide a rating, the comparable S&P rating is used and converted to a Moody’s rating. The following table summarizes the amortized cost of debt securities held to maturity at September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, aggregated by credit quality indicators.

The following tables show the amortized cost and fair value of investment securities at September 30, 2025 by expected maturity. Expected maturities differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay the obligations with or without prepayment penalties. Mortgage-backed securities are included in the year corresponding with the remaining expected life.

Note 4 -Loans

The following table summarizes the composition of our loan portfolio. Total loans are recorded net of deferred loan fees and costs, which totaled $2.2 million and $2.1 million as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively.

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt, including current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis is performed on a monthly basis. Loans not meeting the criteria below that are analyzed individually as part of the analysis are considered as pass rated loans. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Special Mention. Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date. Special mention assets are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.

Substandard. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

The following table presents the Company’s recorded investment in loans by credit quality indicators by year of origination as of September 30, 2025:

The following table presents the Company’s recorded investment in loans by credit quality indicators by year of origination as of December 31, 2024:

The detailed activity in the allowance for credit losses and the recorded investment in loans receivable for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and September 30, 2024 is shown below:

There were eight loans modified for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty during the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and two loans modified for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty during the same period ended September 30, 2024.

The following table shows the amortized cost basis as of September 30, 2025 of the loans modified for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty segregated by loan category and describes the financial effect of the modification made for a borrower experiencing financial difficulty.

The following table depicts the performance of loans that have been modified in the last 12 months.

The following tables are by loan category and present loans past due and on non-accrual status as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024.

The following table is a summary of the Company’s non-accrual loans by major categories for the periods indicated.

The Company recognized $8,700 and $26,100 of interest income on non-accrual loans during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, and the Company recognized $6,800 and $29,200 of interest income on non-accrual loans during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, zero and less than $1,000 of accrued interest was written off by reversing interest income, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, less than $1,000 and $1,600 of accrued interest was written off by reversing interest income, respectively.

There were no collateral dependent loans that were individually evaluated at September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024.

Unfunded Commitments

The Company maintains an allowance for off-balance sheet credit exposures such as unfunded balances for existing lines of credit, commitments to extend future credit, as well as both standby and commercial letters of credit when there is a contractual obligation to extend credit and when this extension of credit is not unconditionally cancellable (i.e., commitment cannot be cancelled at any time). The allowance for off-balance sheet credit exposures is adjusted as a provision for credit loss expense. The estimate includes consideration of the likelihood that funding will occur, which is based on a historical funding study derived from internal information, and an estimate of expected credit losses on commitments expected to be funded over its estimated life, which are the same loss rates that are used in computing the allowance for credit losses on loans. The allowance for credit losses for unfunded loan commitments is separately classified on the balance sheet within Other Liabilities and was $529,000 and $480,000 at September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively.

The following table presents the balance and activity in the allowance for credit losses for unfunded loan commitments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and September 30, 2024.

Note 5 -Fair Value Measurement

US GAAP defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. It also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Fair value estimates, methods, and assumptions are set forth below.

Cash and short term investments-The carrying amount of these financial instruments (cash and due from banks, interest-bearing bank balances, federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell) approximates fair value. All mature within 90 days and do not present unanticipated credit concerns and are classified as Level 1.

Investment Securities-Measurement is on a recurring basis based upon quoted market prices, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for prepayment assumptions, projected credit losses, and liquidity. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, or by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets. Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed securities issued both by government sponsored enterprises and private label mortgage-backed securities. Generally, these fair values are priced from established pricing models. Level 3 securities include corporate debt obligations and asset–backed securities that are less liquid or for which there is an inactive market.

*Other investments, at cost-*The carrying value of other investments, such as FHLB stock, approximates fair value based on redemption provisions.

Loans Held for Sale-The Company originates fixed rate residential loans on a servicing released basis in the secondary market. Loans closed but not yet settled with an investor, are carried in the Company’s loans held for sale portfolio. These loans are fixed rate residential loans that have been originated in the Company’s name and have closed. Virtually all of these loans have commitments to be purchased by investors at a locked in price with the investors on the same day that the loan was locked in with the Company’s customers. Therefore, these loans present very little market risk for the Company and are classified as Level 2. The carrying amount of these loans approximates fair value.

Loans-The valuation of loans receivable is estimated using the exit price notion which incorporates factors, such as enhanced credit risk, illiquidity risk and market factors that sometimes exist in exit prices in dislocated markets. This credit risk assumption is intended to approximate the fair value that a market participant would realize in a hypothetical orderly transaction. The Company’s loan portfolio is initially fair valued using a segmented approach. The Company divides its loan portfolio into the following categories: variable rate loans, individually evaluated loans and all other loans. The results are then adjusted to account for credit risk as described above.

Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”)-OREO is carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value on a non-recurring basis. Fair value is based upon independent appraisals or management’s estimation of the collateral and is considered a Level 3 measurement.

*Derivative Financial Instruments-*Fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow models where future floating cash flows are projected and discounted back. Derivative financial instruments are classified as Level 2.

Accrued Interest Receivable-The fair value approximates the carrying value and is classified as Level 1.

Deposits-The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, and money market accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposits is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. Deposits are classified as Level 2.

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances-Fair value is estimated based on discounted cash flows using current market rates for borrowings with similar terms and are classified as Level 2.

Short Term Borrowings-The carrying value of short term borrowings (securities sold under agreements to repurchase and demand notes to the Treasury) approximates fair value. These are classified as Level 2.

Junior Subordinated Debentures-The fair values of junior subordinated debentures are estimated by using discounted cash flow analyses based on incremental borrowing rates for similar types of instruments. These are classified as Level 2.

Accrued Interest Payable-The fair value approximates the carrying value and is classified as Level 1.

Commitments to Extend Credit-The fair value of these commitments is immaterial because their underlying interest rates approximate market.

The carrying amount and estimated fair value by classification level of the Company’s financial instruments as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 are as follows:

The following tables summarize quantitative disclosures about the fair value for each category of assets carried at fair value as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 that are measured on a recurring basis.

The following table summarizes quantitative disclosures about the fair value for each category of liabilities carried at fair value as of September 30, 2025 that are measured on a recurring basis. There were no liabilities carried at fair value as of December 31, 2024 that are measured on a recurring basis.

The following tables summarize quantitative disclosures about the fair value for each category of assets carried at fair value as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 that are measured on a non-recurring basis. There were no Level 3 financial instruments as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 measured on a recurring basis.

The Company has a large percentage of loans with real estate serving as collateral. Loans to borrowers which are experiencing financial difficulty are primarily valued on a nonrecurring basis at the fair value of the underlying real estate collateral. Such fair values are obtained using independent appraisals, which the Company considers to be Level 3 inputs. There were no such loans at September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024. Third party appraisals are generally obtained when management determines that the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty or at the time it is transferred to OREO. This internal process consists of evaluating the underlying collateral against independently obtained comparable properties. With respect to less complex or smaller credits, an internal evaluation may be performed. Generally, the independent and internal evaluations are updated annually. Factors considered in determining the fair value include, among others, geographic sales trends, the value of comparable surrounding properties and the condition of the property.

For Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements were as follows:

Note 6 -Deposits

The Company’s total deposits are comprised of the following at the dates indicated:

Time deposits of $250,000 or less include zero and $10.4 million in brokered deposits as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively.

Note 7 -Reportable Segments

The Company’s reportable segments represent the distinct product lines the Company offers and are viewed separately for strategic planning by the Bank President and CEO, who is the Chief Operating Decision Maker. (CODM). The CODM regularly reviews the performance of the Company’s four reportable segments, which are detailed below:

The following tables present selected financial information for the Company’s reportable business segments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and September 30, 2024.

The table below presents total assets for the Company’s reportable business segments as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024.

***Note 8 - Derivative Financial Instruments ***

Effective May 5, 2023, the Company entered into a pay-fixed/receive-floating interest rate swap (the “Loan Pay-Fixed Swap Agreement”) for a notional amount of $150.0 million that was designated as a fair value hedge to hedge the risk of changes in the fair value of the fixed rate loans held for investment. This fair value hedge converts the hedged loans from a fixed rate to a synthetic floating SOFR rate. The Loan Pay-Fixed Swap Agreement will mature on May 5, 2026 and will pay a fixed coupon rate of 3.58% while receiving the overnight SOFR rate. The fair value of this hedge is recorded in either other assets or in other liabilities depending on the position of the hedge with the offset recorded in loans.

Effective April 28, 2025, the Company entered into a pay-fixed/receive-floating interest rate swap (the “Investment Pay-Fixed Swap Agreement”) for a notional amount of $19.8 million that was designated as a fair value hedge to hedge the risk of changes in the fair value of securities held in the investment portfolio. This fair value hedge converts the hedged securities from a fixed rate to a USD-SOFR-OIS Compound. The Investment Pay-Fixed Swap Agreement will mature on April 28, 2038 and will pay a fixed coupon rate of 3.67% while receiving USD-SOFR-OIS Compound. The fair value of this hedge is recorded in either other assets or in other liabilities depending on the position of the hedge with the offset recorded in investments.

For both swaps, all changes in fair value are recorded in net interest income.

The interest rate swaps had a total notional amount of $155.4 million and $150.0 million at September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. The interest rate swaps had a positive fair value of $13 thousand and $896 thousand at September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively.

Note 9 -Leases

The Company has operating leases on three of its facilities at September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024. All leases commenced prior to 2024. The three leases have maturities ranging from May 2027 to December 2038, some of which include extensions of multiple two-year terms. The following tables present information about the Company’s leases:

The following table shows future undiscounted lease payments for operating leases with initial terms of one year or more as of September 30, 2025.

Note 10 -Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The following table presents the changes in each component or accumulated other comprehensive loss net of tax, for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024.

Note 11 -Subsequent Events

Subsequent events are events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. Recognized subsequent events are events or transactions that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet, including the estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements. Non-recognized subsequent events are events that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but arose after that date.

Management has reviewed events occurring through the date the financial statements were available to be issued and no other subsequent events occurred requiring accrual or that require disclosure and have not been disclosed in the footnotes to the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2025.

Note 12 –Business Combination

On July 13, 2025, the Company and Signature Bank of Georgia, a Georgia state-chartered bank (“Signature Bank”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “merger agreement”), which provides that, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, Signature Bank will merge with and into First Community Bank, with First Community Bank continuing as the surviving entity following the merger. It is anticipated that the financial closing will be early in the first quarter of 2026 with the operational conversion to follow later in the first or early second quarter of 2026.

At the effective time of the merger, each share of Signature Bank common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.6410 shares of the Company’s common stock. Holders of Signature Bank common stock will receive a cash payment in lieu of any fractional shares. At the effective time of the merger, each outstanding stock option to acquire Signature Bank common stock, whether or not vested, will be converted into the right to receive a cash payment. The amount payable will equal the number of shares of Signature Bank common stock subject to the option multiplied by the excess, if any, of the fair market value per share of Signature Bank common stock (based on the value of the merger consideration) over the option’s exercise price. If the exercise price equals or exceeds the fair market value, a nominal payment of $0.01 per share will be made. All payments will be subject to applicable tax withholdings.