Triumph Financial, Inc.

NOTE 1 —SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Operations

Triumph Financial, Inc. (collectively with its subsidiaries, “Triumph Financial”, or the “Company” as applicable) is a financial holding company headquartered in Dallas, Texas, offering a diversified line of banking, factoring, payments, and intelligence services. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries Triumph CRA Holdings, LLC (“TCRA”), TBK Bank, SSB (“TBK Bank”), and TBK Bank’s wholly owned subsidiary Triumph Insurance Group, Inc. (“TIG”). Substantially all of the Company's products and services (other than certain insurance brokerage activities at TIG) are offered through TBK Bank.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and in accordance with guidance provided by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, the condensed financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation. Transactions between the subsidiaries have been eliminated. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2026.

Reportable Segments

The Company hasfour reportable segments consisting of Banking, Factoring, Payments, and Intelligence. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer uses segment results to evaluate segment performance, develop strategy, and allocate resources. For further discussion of management's operating segments and allocation methodology, see Note 17 – Business Segment Information.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

In December 2023, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2023-09, “Income Taxes (Topic 740), Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures" ("ASU 2023-09"). ASU 2023-09 requires public entities to disclose in their rate reconciliation table additional categories of information about federal, state and foreign income taxes and to provide more details about the reconciling items in some categories if items meet a quantitative threshold. ASU 2023-09 also requires all entities to disclose income taxes paid, net of refunds, disaggregated by federal, state and foreign taxes for annual periods and to disaggregate the information by jurisdiction based on a quantitative threshold, among other things. ASU 2023-09 is effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024 with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 on a prospective basis effective December 31, 2025. Adoption of ASU 2023-09 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In July 2025, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2025-05, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets" ("ASU 2025-05"). ASU 2025-05 provides the option to elect a practical expedient to assume that the current conditions as of the balance sheet date will remain unchanged for the remaining life of the asset when developing a reasonable and supportable forecast as part of estimating expected credit losses on these assets. ASU 2025-05 is effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Adoption of ASU 2025-05 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

Newly Issued, But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards

In November 2024, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2024-03, "Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40)" ("ASU 2024-03"). ASU 2024-03 requires public entities to provide disaggregated disclosures, in the notes to the financial statements, of certain categories of expenses that are included in expense line items on the face of the income statement. ASU 2024-03 is effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company will update its expense disclosures upon adoption.

In September 2025, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2025-06, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40), Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software" ("ASU 2025-06"). ASU 2025-06 clarified and modernizes the accounting for costs related to internal-use software. The amendments in ASU 2025-06 remove all references to project stages throughout Subtopic 350-40 and clarify the threshold entities apply to begin capitalizing costs. ASU 2025-06 is effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of ASU 2025-06 on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2025, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2025-08, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), Purchased Loans" ("ASU 2025-08"). ASU 2025-08 expands the use of the gross-up approach in Accounting Standards Codification 326, "Credit Losses", to all purchased seasoned loans. ASU 2025-08 is effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of ASU 2025-08 on its consolidated financial statements.

USPS Settlement

At June 30, 2025, we carried a receivable (the “Misdirected Payments Receivable”) payable by the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) arising from accounts factored to a large carrier. The balance of such Misdirected Payments Receivable, net of customer reserves, was $19.4 million. The amounts represented by this receivable were paid by the USPS directly to such customer in contravention of notices of assignment delivered to, and previously honored by, the USPS, which amount was then not remitted back to us by such customer as required. The USPS disputed their obligation to make such payment, citing purported deficiencies in the notices delivered to them. We were a party to litigation in the United States Court of Federal Claims against the USPS seeking a ruling that the USPS was obligated to make the payments represented by this receivable directly to us. On June 30, 2025, we reached an agreement with the USPS ("the USPS Settlement") whereby the USPS agreed to pay us $47.5 million to settle the litigation in the United States Court of Federal Claims and certain other related proceedings. Such settlement was entered into as part of a global settlement of the disputes related to the Misdirected Payments Receivable, other amounts we asserted were due to us from USPS for other balances owed to us as a result of their failure to honor our notices of assignment, and certain claims of the large carrier involved in this matter against the USPS for underpayment on certain transportation contracts in which we had a security interest. We received the full $47.5 million settlement proceeds on July 10, 2025. The proceeds of the USPS Settlement were applied as follows:

•$11.5 million to the aforementioned large carrier,

•$19.4 million to relieve the entire balance of Misdirected Payments Receivable, net of customer reserves,

•$1.1 million of interest and fees,

•$7.9 million of legal expense recovery

•$3.8 million to recovery of previously charged-off acquired over-formula advances related to the aforementioned large carrier, and

•$3.8 million to the counterparty of an indemnification asset associated with this matter.

The $19.4 million Misdirected Payments Receivable balance was legally discharged upon receipt of the settlement proceeds on July 10, 2025. The USPS Settlement had a $12.4 million and $11.5 million positive impact on pretax net income for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and nine months ended September 30, 2025, respectively, made up of the prior period impacts of the interest and fees, legal expense recovery, and the recovery of the previously charged-off acquired over-formula advances. The USPS Settlement did not have an impact on pretax net income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026.

Restructuring Activities

In August 2025, the Company announced a reduction in force involving approximately 5% of the Company's workforce, as well as other cost saving initiatives including non-headcount related reductions in facilities, legacy technology, vendor spend, and travel. These actions are part of the Company’s initiatives to re-balance its cost structure in light of technology investments that have delivered significant efficiencies across the organization. These advancements have reduced the need for certain roles and prompted a reorganization of teams and responsibilities to better serve the Company’s transportation verticals. The Company believes these actions will strengthen its competitive position, enhance operational agility, and support sustainable long-term growth.

During the three months ended September 30, 2025, the Company recognized $3,134,000 of expense related to the reduction in force, which consisted primarily of one-time termination charges arising from severance obligations and other customary employee benefit payments made in connection with a reduction in force. These costs were included in salaries and benefits expense in the consolidated statements of income and for segment reporting, $522,000 of the expense was recognized by the Banking segment, $1,059,000 was recognized by the Factoring segment, $513,000 was recognized by the Payments segment, $210,000 was recognized by the Intelligence segment, and $830,000 was allocated to the corporate and other category. The Company's Factoring segment recognized an additional $68,000 of severance expense during the three months ended December 31, 2025.

The Company also recognized $1,250,000 of expense during the three months ended September 30, 2025 related to the cost saving initiatives, which consisted primarily of one-time contract amendment fees. These costs were included in professional fees in the consolidated statements of income and were allocated to the corporate and other category for segment reporting.

All of the restructuring costs were incurred and paid during the year ended December 31, 2025.

NOTE 2 —ACQUISITIONS AND DIVESTITURES

Greenscreens.ai

On May 8, 2025, the Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary TBK Bank, SSB, acquired Greenscreens AI, Inc. ("Greenscreens"), a pricing solution for the logistics industry that delivers short-term freight market pricing intelligence and business insights.

A summary of the estimated fair values of assets acquired, consideration transferred, and the resulting goodwill is as follows:

Consideration paid for the acquisition totaled $151,707,000, including $138,975,000 in cash and 256,984 shares of the Company's common stock valued at $12,732,000.

The Company has recognized goodwill of $113,347,000, which included measurement period adjustments related to customary settlement adjustments, intangible asset valuation adjustments, and the finalization of the Greenscreens stub period tax return and its impact on the acquired deferred tax liability. Goodwill was calculated as the excess of the fair value of consideration exchanged as compared to the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired. The goodwill in this acquisition resulted from expected synergies between the Company's Factoring, Payments, and Intelligence segments, as well as progress towards the development of data products to be offered to the freight brokerage community; therefore goodwill of $16,293,000 was allocated to the Company's Factoring segment, $15,601,000 was allocated to the Company's Payments segment, and $81,453,000 was allocated to the Company’s Intelligence segment. The goodwill will not be deducted for tax purposes.

The intangible assets recognized include a customer relationship intangible asset with an acquisition date fair value of $35,480,000 which will be amortized utilizing an accelerated method over itstwelve year estimated useful life and a capitalized software intangible asset with an acquisition date fair value of $8,320,000 which will be amortized on a straight-line basis over itsfive year estimated useful life. A customer relationship intangible asset of $20,860,000 was allocated to the Company's Intelligence segment and a customer relationship intangible asset of $14,620,000 was allocated to the Company's Payments segment. The entire software intangible asset was allocated to the Company's Intelligence segment.

Revenue and earnings of Greenscreens since the acquisition date have not been disclosed as the acquired company was merged into the Company and separate financial information is not readily available.

Expenses related to the acquisition totaling $3,009,000 and $967,000 were recorded in professional fees in the consolidated statements of income during the three months ended June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025, respectively.

NOTE 3 —SECURITIES

Equity Securities With Readily Determinable Fair Values

The Company held equity securities with readily determinable fair values of $4,369,000 and $4,588,000 at September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. The gross realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized on equity securities with readily determinable fair values included in noninterest income in the Company’s consolidated statements of income were as follows:

Equity Securities Without Readily Determinable Fair Values

The following table summarizes the Company's investments in equity securities without readily determinable fair values:

Equity securities without readily determinable fair values include Federal Home Loan Bank and other restricted stock, which are reported separately in the Company's consolidated balance sheets. Equity securities without readily determinable fair values also include the Company's investments in the common stock of Trax Group, Inc. and Warehouse Solutions Inc., with carrying amounts of $9,700,000 and $38,088,000, respectively, at September 30, 2026. Both investments have been allocated to our Payments segment and are included in other assets in the Company's consolidated balance sheets.

There wereno realized or unrealized gains or losses recognized on equity securities without readily determinable fair values during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025.

Management monitors its equity securities without readily determinable fair values for observable transactions in similar equity instruments as well as indicators of impairment, either of which would require it to mark such equity securities to fair value. No such transactions or indicators of impairment were detected during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025.

Debt Securities

Debt securities have been classified in the financial statements as available for sale or held to maturity. The following table summarizes the amortized cost, fair value, and allowance for credit losses of debt securities and the corresponding amounts of gross unrealized gains and losses of available for sale securities recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and gross unrecognized gains and losses of held to maturity securities:

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities at September 30, 2026, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

There were no sales of debt securities during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025.

Debt securities with a carrying amount of approximately $32,093,000 and $28,896,000 at September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits and for other purposes required or permitted by law.

Accrued interest on available for sale securities totaled $1,513,000 and $3,387,000 at September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively, and was included inother assets on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. There wasno accrued interest related to debt securities reversed against interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025.

The following table summarizes available for sale debt securities in an unrealized loss position for which an allowance for credit losses has not been recorded, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position:

Management evaluates available for sale debt securities in unrealized loss positions to determine whether the impairment is due to credit-related factors or noncredit-related factors. Consideration is given to (1) the extent to which the fair value is less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

At September 30, 2026, the Company had 83 available for sale debt securities in an unrealized loss position without an allowance for credit losses. Management does not have the intent to sell any of these securities and believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell any such securities before a recovery of cost. The fair value is expected to recover as the securities approach their maturity date or repricing date or if market yields for such investments decline. Accordingly, as of September 30, 2026, management believes that the unrealized losses detailed in the previous table are due to noncredit-related factors, including changes in interest rates and other market conditions, and therefore the Company carriedno allowance for credit losses on available for sale debt securities at September 30, 2026.

The following table presents the activity in the allowance for credit losses for held to maturity debt securities:

The Company’s held to maturity securities are investments in the unrated subordinated notes of collateralized loan obligation ("CLO") funds. These securities are the junior-most in securitization capital structures and are subject to suspension of distributions if the credit of the underlying loan portfolios deteriorates materially. The ACL on held to maturity securities is estimated at each measurement date on a collective basis by major security type. Expected credit losses for these securities are estimated using a discounted cash flow methodology which considers historical credit loss information that is adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Ultimately, the realized cash flows on CLO securities such as these will be driven by a variety of factors, including credit performance of the underlying loan portfolio, adjustments to the portfolio by the asset manager, and the timing of a potential call. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company charged offone of itsthree investments in these CLO funds as it was deemed to be an uncollectible investment. The charge-off was fully reserved in a prior period. At September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, $3,042,000 and $1,913,000, respectively, of the Company’s held to maturity securities were classified as nonaccrual.

NOTE 4 —LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

Loans Held for Sale

The following table presents loans held for sale:

Loans Held for Investment

Loans

The following table presents the amortized cost and unpaid principal balance of loans held for investment:

The difference between the amortized cost and the unpaid principal is due to (1) premiums and discounts associated with acquired loans totaling $7,972,000 and $9,300,000 at September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively, and (2) net deferred origination and factoring fees totaling $4,709,000 and $2,530,000 at September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively.

Accrued interest on loans, which is excluded from the amortized cost of loans held for investment, totaled $35,811,000 and $42,478,000 at September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively, and was included in other assets on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.

During the three months ended June 30, 2025, the Company acquired a $23,411,000 nonperforming commercial loan for $3,284,000. The loan was purchased credit deteriorated ("PCD") and a $10,780,000 ACL was established on Day 1 resulting in a discount of $9,348,000. Prior to June 30, 2025, the Company determined that the entire $10,780,000 ACL was uncollectible and charged off the entire amount. Such charge-off had no impact on credit loss expense.

As of September 30, 2026, most of the Company’s non-factoring business activity is with customers located within certain states. The states of Texas (15%), Colorado (10%), Illinois (13%), and Iowa (4%) make up 42% of the Company’s gross loans, excluding factored receivables. Therefore, the Company’s exposure to credit risk is affected by changes in the economies in these states. At December 31, 2025, the states of Texas (20%), Illinois (10%), Colorado (10%), and Iowa (4%) made up 44% of the Company’s gross loans, excluding factored receivables.

A majority (98%) of the Company's factored receivables, representing approximately 38% of the Company's total loan portfolio as of September 30, 2026, are transportation receivables. At December 31, 2025,97% of the Company's factored receivables, representing approximately 29% of the Company's total loan portfolio, were transportation receivables.

At September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the Company had $379,363,000 and $338,496,000, respectively, of customer reserves associated with factored receivables. These amounts represent customer reserves held to settle any payment disputes or collection shortfalls, may be used to pay customers’ obligations to various third parties as directed by the customer, are periodically released to or withdrawn by customers, and are reported as deposits in the consolidated balance sheets.

Loans with carrying amounts of $1,581,144,000 and $1,725,914,000 at September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively, were pledged to secure Federal Home Loan Bank borrowing capacity and Federal Reserve Bank discount window borrowing capacity.

Allowance for Credit Losses

The Company’s estimate of the ACL reflects losses expected over the remaining contractual life of the assets. The contractual term does not consider extensions, renewals or modifications. The activity in the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) related to loans held for investment is as follows:

The increase in required ACL during the three months ended September 30, 2026 is a function of net charge-offs of $1,216,000 and credit loss expense of $5,028,000.

The increase in required ACL during the nine months ended September 30, 2026 is a function of net charge-offs of $4,811,000 and credit loss expense of $6,895,000.

The Company uses the discounted cash flow (DCF) method to estimate ACL for the commercial real estate, construction, land development, land, 1-4 family residential, commercial (excluding liquid credit), and consumer loan pools. During the quarter ended September 30, 2026, the Company implemented updated DCF models to estimate expected credit losses and resulting ACL for said loan pools. While the underlying DCF methodology did not change, the new models reflect updated Company and peer loss data thus enhancing the applicability of reasonable and supportable forecasts. Implementation of the updated DCF models resulted in a $1,204,000 decrease in the allowance for credit losses recognized as a reduction of credit loss expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026. The majority of the ACL decrease driven by updated DCF model adoption was concentrated in our equipment finance loan pool which experienced low losses on defaulted loans through the prior three years when over the road trucking macroeconomic conditions were challenging. There were no other significant impacts at the pooled level as a result of the implementation of the new models. The change was accounted for prospectively as a change in accounting estimate.

Prior to the quarter ended September 30, 2026, for all loan pools utilizing the DCF method, the Company utilized and forecasted national unemployment as a loss driver. The Company also utilized and forecasted either one-year percentage change in national retail sales (commercial real estate – non multifamily, commercial general, commercial agriculture, commercial asset-based lending, commercial equipment finance, consumer), one-year percentage change in the national home price index (1-4 family residential and construction, land development, land), or one-year percentage change in national gross domestic product (commercial real estate – multifamily) as a second loss driver depending on the nature of the underlying loan pool and how well that loss driver correlated to expected future losses. Consistent forecasts of the loss drivers were used across the loan segments.

Effective for the quarter ended September 30, 2026, for all applicable loan pools utilizing the updated DCF models, the Company utilizes and forecasts national unemployment and one-year percentage change in national gross domestic product as loss drivers as those loss drivers most closely correlate to expected future losses under the new models. Consistent forecasts of the loss drivers are used across the loan segments.

Under the prior DCF models and the updated DCF models, the Company forecasted the same prepayment speeds with higher prepayment speeds resulting in lower required ACL levels and vice versa for shorter prepayment speeds. These assumed prepayment speeds are based upon our historical prepayment speeds by loan type adjusted for the expected impact of the future interest rate environment. The impact of these assumed prepayment speeds is lesser in magnitude than the aforementioned loss driver assumptions.

For all DCF models prior to the quarter ended September 30, 2026, the Company had determined that four quarters represented a reasonable and supportable forecast period and the DCF models reverted back to a historical loss rate over eight quarters on a straight-line basis. For all updated DCF models at September 30, 2026, the Company has determined that four quarters represents a reasonable and supportable forecast period and reverts back to a historical loss rate over four quarters on a straight-line basis. The Company continues to leverage economic projections from a reputable and independent third party to inform its loss driver forecasts over the four-quarter forecast period. Other internal and external indicators of economic forecasts are also considered by the Company when developing the forecast metrics. At September 30, 2026 as compared to December 31, 2025, the Company forecasted slight improvement in national unemployment and minimal change in one-year percentage change in national gross domestic product. At September 30, 2026 for national unemployment, the Company projected a percentage in the first quarter that would be slightly higher than the current unemployment rate followed by a gradual rise in the following three quarters. For percentage change in national gross domestic product, management projected very low growth for the first two projected quarters with low levels of contraction for the final two projected quarters. At September 30, 2026, the Company used its historical prepayment speeds with minimal adjustment.

The Company continues to use a loss-rate method to estimate expected credit losses for the farmland, liquid credit, factored receivable, and mortgage warehouse loan pools. For each of these loan segments, the Company applies an expected loss ratio based on internal and peer historical losses adjusted as appropriate for qualitative factors. Qualitative loss factors are based on the Company's judgment of company, market, industry or business specific data, changes in underlying loan composition of specific portfolios, trends relating to credit quality, delinquency, non-performing and adversely rated loans, and reasonable and supportable forecasts of economic conditions. Loss factors used to calculate the required ACL on pools that use the loss-rate method reflect the forecasted economic conditions described above.

For the three months ended September 30, 2026, changes in projected loss drivers and prepayment assumptions over the reasonable and supportable forecast period decreased the required ACL by $695,000. Changes in loan volume and mix increased the required ACL by $1,368,000. Changes in required specific reserves increased the ACL by $4,343,000. Implementation of the updated DCF assumptions resulted in a $1,204,000 decrease in the allowance for credit losses. Net charge-offs during the period were $1,216,000.

For the three months ended September 30, 2025, changes in projected loss drivers and prepayment assumptions over the reasonable and supportable forecast period increased the required ACL by $156,000. Changes in loan volume and mix increased the required ACL by $243,000. Changes in required specific reserves decreased the ACL by $5,542,000. Net charge-offs during the period were $9,391,000.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2026, changes in projected loss drivers and prepayment assumptions over the reasonable and supportable forecast period decreased the required ACL by $4,324,000. Changes in loan volume and mix increased the required ACL by $4,622,000. Changes in required specific reserves increased the required ACL by $2,990,000. Implementation of the updated DCF assumptions resulted in a $1,204,000 decrease in the allowance for credit losses. Net charge-offs during the period were $4,811,000.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, changes in projected loss drivers and prepayment assumptions over the reasonable and supportable forecast period increased the required ACL by $442,000. Changes in loan volume and mix increased the required ACL by $2,029,000. Changes in required specific reserves decreased the required ACL by $9,637,000. Net charge-offs during the period were $22,992,000.

The following table presents the amortized cost basis of collateral dependent loans, which are individually evaluated to determine expected credit losses, and the related ACL allocated to these loans:

Commercial loans secured by Other collateral primarily consist of large liquid credit loans secured by the underlying enterprise values of the borrowers.

Past Due and Nonaccrual Loans

The following tables present an aging of contractually past due loans:

Given the nature of factored receivables, these assets are disclosed as past due 90 days or more still accruing; however, the Company is not recognizing income on the assets. Historically, any income recognized on factored receivables that are past due 90 days or more has not been material.

The following table presents the amortized cost basis of loans on nonaccrual status and the amortized cost basis of loans on nonaccrual status for which there was no related allowance for credit losses:

The following table presents accrued interest on nonaccrual loans reversed through interest income:

There wasno interest earned on nonaccrual loans during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025.

The following table presents information regarding nonperforming loans:

Credit Quality Information

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt, including: current collateral and financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk on a regular basis. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as consumer loans, are analyzed primarily based on payment status. The Company uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

Pass– Pass rated loans have low to average risk and are not otherwise classified.

Classified– Classified loans are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the repayment of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Certain classified loans have the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Management considers the guidance in ASC 310-20 when determining whether a modification, extension, or renewal of loan constitutes a current period origination. As of September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans is as follows:

Loan Modifications to Borrowers Experiencing Financial Difficulty

In an effort to mitigate potential losses on loans, the Company will endeavor to work with borrowers experiencing financial difficulty to modify the terms of such loans to improve the likelihood of principal repayment. Such modifications generally fall into four broad categories; principal forgiveness, interest rate reduction, other-than-insignificant payment delay, or a term extension. Modifications can reflect one or multiple modification categories. For all loan types, including commercial real estate loans, the Company considers the likelihood of repayment by the borrower experiencing financial difficulty under the potential agreed upon modified terms. If such repayment is not deemed likely, the Company will not grant the troubled borrower a modification and will commence ultimate collection proceedings. On an ongoing basis, the Company monitors the performance of modified loans related to their restructured terms.

The following tables present the amortized cost basis of loan modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty made during the reporting period:

There wereno loans modified in the form of a payment delay during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and the three months ended September 30, 2025.

Generally, if a loan to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty is modified, the Company will seek to obtain credit enhancements when possible.

The following table presents the payment status of loans that have been modified in the last twelve months:

At September 30, 2026, the Company had $18,000 of commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty for which the Company modified the terms of the loans in the form of principal forgiveness, an interest rate reduction, an other-than-insignificant payment delay, or a term extension during the current period.

There were $954,000 of commercial loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty that had a payment default during the three months ended September 30, 2026 and were modified in the form of a term extension in the twelve months prior to that default. There were $37,554,000 of commercial real estate loans and $968,000 of commercial loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty that had a payment default during the nine months ended September 30, 2026 and were modified in the form of a term extension in the twelve months prior to that default.

There wereno loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty that had a payment default during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and were modified in the twelve months prior to that default. Default is determined at 90 or more days past due, upon charge-off, or upon foreclosure. Modified loans in default are individually evaluated for the allowance for credit losses or if the modified loan is deemed uncollectible, the loan, or a portion of the loan, is written off and the allowance for credit losses is adjusted accordingly.

Residential Real Estate Loans In Process of Foreclosure

At September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the Company had $1,409,000 and $371,000, respectively, of 1-4 family residential real estate loans for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process.

Other Real Estate Owned

At September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the Company had $0 and $10,185,000 of other real estate owned, net.

NOTE 5 —GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill and intangible assets consist of the following:

The changes in goodwill and intangible assets during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025 are as follows:

NOTE 6 —VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

Collateralized Loan Obligation Funds – Closed

The Company holds investments in the subordinated notes of the following closed Collateralized Loan Obligation (“CLO”) funds:

The net carrying amounts of the Company’s investments in the subordinated notes of the CLO funds, which represent the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with the CLO funds, totaled $554,000 and $1,550,000 at September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively, and are classified as held to maturity securities within the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

The Company performed a consolidation analysis to confirm whether the Company was required to consolidate the assets, liabilities, equity or operations of the closed CLO funds in its financial statements. The Company concluded that the closed CLO funds were variable interest entities and that the Company holds variable interests in the entities in the form of its investments in the subordinated notes of entities. However, the Company also concluded that the Company does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entities’ economic performance. As a result, the Company was not the primary beneficiary and therefore was not required to consolidate the assets, liabilities, equity, or operations of the closed CLO funds in the Company’s financial statements.

NOTE 7 —DEPOSITS

Deposits are summarized as follows:

Mortgage Warehouse Deposits

The Company's mortgage warehouse business is more than self-funded due to the noninterest bearing servicing deposits of its clients. The balance of such deposits was $2,639,810,000 and $668,288,000 at September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. Given their legal form, these deposits are classified as noninterest-bearing demand deposits on the Company's balance sheets. Despite their classification, many of these deposits are not truly free of cost as the Company compensates its clients for these balances in the form of an earnings interest rebate rather than deposit interest. As a result, such noninterest bearing deposits first decrease the Company's loan yield before increasing its deposit rates. Some clients hold significantly higher deposit balances than loan balances. As a result, in some cases, the Company has recently been paying out more in rebates than it earns in interest on a given client’s loans. In those cases, the Company records excess rebate as deposit interest expense. Whether recorded as interest expense or an offset to interest income, the effect on net interest income and net income is the same: these are profitable funds as they displace more expensive wholesale funding and can be invested risk-free above their cost. During the three months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, deposit interest expense recognized on these deposits was $15,710,000 and $0, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, deposit interest expense recognized on these deposits was $28,052,000 and $0, respectively.

NOTE 8 —LEGAL CONTINGENCIES

TBK Bank, SSB (the “Bank”), the wholly-owned bank subsidiary of the Company, is the agent bank for a $60.5 million floorplan loan facility, of which the Bank holds approximately $22.5 million, for which Tricolor Holdings, LLC (“Tricolor”) is the lead borrower. On September 10, 2025, Tricolor and its affiliates filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The floorplan loan facility is secured by a first-priority security interest in the vehicle inventory and certain other assets of Tricolor. As of September 30, 2026, the Bank believes its collateral position adequately secures the outstanding balance of the loan facility. As the bankruptcy proceedings progress, however, the Bank may discover additional information regarding the status of specific collateral securing the loan. Other creditors have asserted that they have interests in some of the collateral in which the Bank asserts a first-priority security interest. To the extent necessary, the bankruptcy court may ultimately have to determine the Bank’s and other creditors’ interest in such collateral. The Company may also be subject to additional claims asserted by creditors or the trustee in the bankruptcy proceedings. Should any of such factual determinations or developments in the bankruptcy proceedings negatively impact the Bank’s assessment of its collateral position or otherwise have a negative impact on the Company, the Company might incur losses which could be material to our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Additionally, other various legal claims have arisen from time to time in the normal course of business which, in the opinion of management as of September 30, 2026, will have no material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 9 —OFF-BALANCE SHEET LOAN COMMITMENTS

From time to time, the Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments.

The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet financial instruments.

The contractual amounts of financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk were as follows:

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being fully drawn upon, the total commitment amounts disclosed above do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if considered necessary by the Company, upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. In the event of nonperformance by the customer, the Company has rights to the underlying collateral, which can include commercial real estate, physical plant and property, inventory, receivables, cash and marketable securities. The credit risk to the Company in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to its customers.

Mortgage warehouse commitments are unconditionally cancellable and represent the unused capacity on mortgage warehouse facilities the Company has approved. The Company reserves the right to refuse to buy any mortgage loans offered for sale by a customer, for any reason, at the Company’s sole and absolute discretion. Other loan commitments represent loans purchased by the Company that have not yet settled.

The Company records an allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures through a charge to credit loss expense on the Company’s consolidated statements of income. At September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures totaled $2,063,000 and $2,342,000, respectively, and was included in other liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The following table presents credit loss expense for off balance sheet credit exposures:

NOTE 10 —FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:

Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2 – Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 – Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

The methods of determining the fair value of assets and liabilities presented in this note are consistent with the methodologies disclosed in Note 15 of the Company’s 2025 Form 10-K.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized in the table below.

There were no transfers between levels during 2026 or 2025.

Revenue Share Asset

On June 30, 2022 and September 6, 2022, the Company entered into and closedtwo separate agreements to selltwo separate portfolios of factored receivables. The June 30, 2022 agreement contains revenue share provisions that entitles the Company to an amount equal tofifteen percent of the future gross monthly revenue of the clients associated with the sold factored receivable portfolio. The September 6, 2022 agreement contains revenue share provisions that entitles the Company to an amount ranging from fifteen totwenty percent, depending on the client, of the future gross monthly revenue of the clients associated with the sold factored receivable portfolio. The fair value of the revenue share assets is calculated each reporting period, and changes in the fair value of the revenue share assets are recorded in noninterest income in the consolidated statements of income. The revenue share asset fair value is considered a Level 3 classification.

At September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the estimated cash payments expected to be received from the purchaser for the Company's share of future gross monthly revenue was $2,070,000 and $2,256,000, respectively, and a discount rate of 10.0% was applied to calculate the present value of the revenue share asset. A reconciliation of the opening balance to the closing balance of the fair value of the revenue share asset is as follows:

Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized in the table below. There wereno liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025.

Collateral Dependent Loans Specific Allocation of ACL: A loan is considered to be a collateral dependent loan when, based on current information and events, the Company expects repayment of the financial assets to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral and the Company has determined that the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty as of the measurement date. The ACL is measured by estimating the fair value of the loan based on the present value of expected cash flows, the market price of the loan, or the underlying fair value of the loan’s collateral. For real estate loans, fair value of the loan’s collateral is determined by third party appraisals, which are then adjusted for the estimated selling and closing costs related to liquidation of the collateral. For this asset class, the actual valuation methods (income, sales comparable, or cost) vary based on the status of the project or property. For example, land is generally based on the sales comparable method while construction is based on the income and/or sales comparable methods. The unobservable inputs may vary depending on the individual assets with no one of the three methods being the predominant approach. The Company reviews the third party appraisal for appropriateness and adjusts the value downward to consider selling and closing costs, which typically range from 5% to 8% of the appraised value. For non-real estate loans, fair value of the loan’s collateral may be determined using an appraisal, net book value per the borrower’s financial statements, or aging reports, adjusted or discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of the valuation, and management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and client’s business.

The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments not measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis at September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 were as follows:

NOTE 11 —REGULATORY MATTERS

The Company (on a consolidated basis) and TBK Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal and state banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s or TBK Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and TBK Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and TBK Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total, common equity Tier 1, and Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to average assets. Management believes, as of September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the Company and TBK Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

As of September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, TBK Bank’s capital ratios exceeded those levels necessary to be categorized as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as “well capitalized,” TBK Bank must maintain minimum total risk based, common equity Tier 1 risk based, Tier 1 risk based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table below. There are no conditions or events since September 30, 2026 that management believes have changed TBK Bank’s category.

The actual capital amounts and ratios for the Company and TBK Bank are presented in the following table.

Dividends paid by TBK Bank are limited to, without prior regulatory approval, current year earnings and earnings less dividends paid during the preceding two years.

The capital conservation buffer set forth by the Basel III regulatory capital framework was 2.5% at September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress and requires increased capital levels for the purpose of capital distributions and other payments. Failure to meet the full amount of the buffer will result in restrictions on the Company’s ability to make capital distributions, including dividend payments and stock repurchases, and to pay discretionary bonuses to executive officers. At September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the Company’s and TBK Bank’s risk based capital exceeded the required capital conservation buffer.

NOTE 12 —STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

The following summarizes the capital structure of Triumph Financial, Inc.

Preferred Stock Series C

Common Stock

NOTE 13 —STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

Stock based compensation expense that has been charged against income was $3,561,000 and $4,013,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $11,088,000 and $10,274,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.

2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan

The Company’s 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (“Omnibus Incentive Plan”) provides for the grant of nonqualified and incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, and other awards that may be settled in, or based upon the value of, the Company’s common stock. The maximum number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the Omnibus Incentive Plan is 3,650,000 shares.

Restricted Stock Units

A summary of changes in the Company’s nonvested Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) under the Omnibus Incentive Plan for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 were as follows:

RSUs granted to employees under the Omnibus Incentive Plan typically vest overone tofour years. Compensation expense for the RSUs will be recognized over the vesting period of the awards based on the fair value of the stock at the issue date. As of September 30, 2026, there was $5,651,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested RSUs. The cost is expected to be recognized over a remaining period of 2.72 years.

Market Based Performance Stock Units

A summary of changes in the Company’s nonvested Market Based Performance Stock Units (“Market Based PSUs”) under the Omnibus Incentive Plan for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 were as follows:

Market Based PSUs granted to employees under the Omnibus Incentive Plan vest after three years. The number of shares issued upon vesting will range from 0% to 175% of the Market Based PSUs granted based on the Company’s relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) as compared to the TSR of specified groups of peer companies, and with respect to the Company's awards granted during and after 2023, may include an additional multiplier of up to 200% of the otherwise earned award based on the Company's absolute TSR. Compensation expense for the Market Based PSUs will be recognized over the vesting period of the awards based on the fair value of the award at the grant date. The fair value of Market Based PSUs granted is estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation. Expected volatilities were determined based on the historical volatilities of the Company and the specified peer group. The risk-free interest rate for the performance period was derived from the Treasury constant maturities yield curve on the valuation dates.

The fair value of the Market Based PSUs granted was determined using the following weighted-average assumptions:

As of September 30, 2026, there was $15,098,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested Market Based PSUs. The cost is expected to be recognized over a remaining period of 2.08 years.

Stock Options

A summary of the changes in the Company’s stock options under the Omnibus Incentive Plan for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 were as follows:

Information related to the stock options for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025 was as follows:

Stock options awarded to employees under the Omnibus Incentive Plan are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant, vest over four years, and haveten year contractual terms. The fair value of stock options granted is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatilities are determined based on the Company’s historical volatility. The expected term of the options granted is determined based on the SEC simplified method, which calculates the expected term as the mid-point between the weighted average time to vesting and the contractual term. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the options is derived from the Treasury constant maturity yield curve on the valuation date.

The fair value of the stock options granted was determined using the following weighted-average assumptions:

As of September 30, 2026, there was $2,704,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted under the Omnibus Incentive Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized over a remaining period of 2.95 years.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted, and the Company’s stockholders approved, the Company's 2019 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”). Under the ESPP,2,500,000 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance. The ESPP enables eligible employees to purchase the Company’s common stock at a price per share equal to 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the common stock at the beginning or end of eachsix month offering period. During the nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025,42,682 shares and 44,048 shares, respectively, were issued under the plan.

NOTE 14 —EARNINGS PER SHARE

The factors used in the earnings per share computation follow:

Shares that were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share because they were antidilutive are as follows:

NOTE 15 —REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

The Company records revenue from contracts with customers in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“Topic 606”). Under Topic 606, the Company must identify the contract with a customer, identify the performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and recognize revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies a performance obligation. The Company generally fully satisfies its performance obligations on its contracts with customers as services are rendered and the transaction prices can be fixed or variable; charged either on a periodic basis or based on activity. Except as disclosed below, the Company presents disaggregated revenue from contracts with customers in the consolidated statements of income.

Banking and Factoring Segments

The Banking segment derives its revenue principally from investments in interest-earning assets as well as noninterest income typical for the banking industry, and the Factoring segment derives the large majority of its revenue from interest income on purchased factored receivables. The majority of such revenue streams fall under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 310, “Receivables” (“Topic 310”) which is outside the scope of Topic 606. There are, however, certain Banking and Factoring activities that generate revenue under Topic 606. Descriptions of the Company's significant Banking and Factoring revenue-generating activities within the scope of Topic 606, which are included in non-interest income in the Company's consolidated statements of income, are as follows:

•Service charges on deposits. Service charges on deposits primarily consists of fees from the Company's deposit customers for account maintenance, account analysis, and overdraft services. Account maintenance fees and analysis fees are earned over the course of a month, representing the period over which the Company satisfies the performance obligation. Overdraft fees are recognized at the point in time that the overdraft occurs.

•Card income. Card income primarily consists of interchange fees. Interchange fees from cardholder transactions represent a percentage of the underlying transaction value and are recognized when the transaction processing services are provided to the cardholder.

•Net OREO gains (losses) and valuation adjustments. The Company records a gain or loss from the sale of OREO when control of the property transfers to the buyer, which generally occurs at the time of an executed deed. When the Company finances the sale of OREO to the buyer, the Company assesses whether the buyer is committed to perform their obligations under the contract and whether collectability of the transaction price is probable. Once these criteria are met, the OREO asset is derecognized and the gain or loss on sale is recorded upon the transfer of control of the property to the buyer.

•Fee income. Fee income for the Banking and Factoring segments primarily consists of transaction-based fees, including wire transfer fees, ACH and check fees, early termination fees, and other fees, earned from the Company's banking and factoring customers. Transaction based fees are recognized at the time the transaction is executed as that is the point in time the Company satisfies its performance obligations.

•Insurance commissions. Insurance commissions are earned for brokering insurance policies and providing administrative services to the Company's customers, over-the-road Carriers, over theone year life of the insurance policies. Because the administrative services are integral to the brokerage relationship, the brokering and servicing are considered one performance obligation and no allocation of the commission transaction price is required. The commissions are recognized over theone-year policy term.

Payments Segment

The Payments segment derives a portion of its revenue from interest income on factored receivables and commercial loans related to invoice payments. These factored receivables consist of (i) invoices where we offer a Carrier a QuickPay opportunity to receive payment at a discount in advance of the standard payment term for such invoice in exchange for the assignment of such invoice to us and (ii) factoring transactions where we purchase receivables payable to such freight brokers from their shipper clients. The Payments segment also offers commercial loans that result from our offering certain Brokers an additional liquidity option through the ability to settle their invoices with us on an extended term following our payment to their Carriers. There wereno such commercial loans at September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025. Such revenue falls under Topic 310 and is outside the scope of Topic 606.

The products and services offered through the Company's Payments segment connect Brokers, Shippers, Factors and Carriers through forward-thinking solutions that help each party successfully manage the life cycle of invoice presentment for services provided by Carrier through processing and audit of such invoice to its ultimate payment to the Carrier or the Factor. The Payments segment earns transaction revenue for such services from fees paid byits customers to receive auditing and payment processing of their invoices. Transaction revenue is recorded in Fee Income on the Consolidated Statements of Income and is subject to Topic 606. Transaction fees can be variable in nature. When such fees are variable, they are typically based upon the number of audit and payment transactions executed during a stated period; generally a calendar month. The customer is charged either a set fee per transaction or a set minimum fee for a stated number of transactions with the variable component being a per-invoice amount for transactions exceeding the stated minimum number. When applicable, the stated minimum number of transactions typically resets on a monthly basis. Transaction volume and related variable fees are known and recognized at each reporting period. Transaction fees can also be fixed in nature with such fees reflecting a set annual amount that is recognized ratably over the terms of the related contracts. In both variable and fixed arrangements, customers are typically billed monthly in arrears with payment due on 30 day terms and as such, no revenue is deferred.

Our LoadPay product, a digital banking platform developed for Carriers, is housed within our Payments segment. LoadPay provides a user experience and financial products, including small business transactional accounts, tailored to the financial needs of the small trucking companies that are the ultimate payees inside of the payments network. A key feature of the LoadPay product is our ability to rapidly fund invoices approved for payment through the payments network or approved for purchase as part of our factoring operations to the LoadPay account without the need for such payments to be processed through traditional payment rails such as ACH transfers.

LoadPay transaction revenue is recognized on interchange fees and instant transfer fees. The Carrier’s LoadPay bank account funds are deposited in a TBK noninterest bearing transactional account. The Carrier has the option to spend the funds directly from the transactional account via a TBK debit card which results in interchange fees (consistently recognized in accordance with the Card income discussion under the Banking segment). Additionally, the Carrier has the ability to transfer its LoadPay transactional account funds to another financial institution. In lieu of an ACH transfer for which the funds will take 2-3 days to be made available in the Carrier’s third party account, the Carrier can elect an instant transfer where the funds will be made available immediately for a fee retained by TBK. Instant transfer fees are within the scope of Topic 606. Instant transfer fees are variable in nature. They are based upon the number of instant transfer transactions executed during a given day. The customer is charged a set fee per transaction that scales up based on the size of the transaction. Instant transfer fees are typically collected directly prior to transfer of the funds and as such, no revenue is deferred.

The Payments segment's service comprises a single performance obligation to provide stand-ready access to its payments and audit platforms for its customers which is satisfied over time as services are rendered. Given the nature of its services and related revenue, no significant judgments are made in applying Topic 606 and there are no refund, warranty, or similar obligations.

The Payments segment's contracts with its customers are usually short-term in nature and can generally be terminated by either party without a termination penalty or refund after the notice period has lapsed. Therefore, the contracts are defined at the transaction level and do not extend beyond the service already provided. The contracts generally renew automatically without any significant material rights. Some of the contracts include tiered pricing, which is based primarily on volume. The fee charged per transaction is adjusted up or down based on the volume processed for a specified period. Management has concluded that this volume-based pricing approach does not constitute a future material right since changes in the fee ranges are typically offered to classes of customers with similar volume.

The Payments segment recognizes fees charged to its customers on a gross basis as transaction revenue as it is the principal in respect of completing Payments segment transactions. As a principal to the transaction, the Payments segment controls the services on its platforms. The Payments segment bears primary responsibility for the fulfillment of the services, contracts directly with its customers, controls the product specifications, and defines the value proposal from its services. Further, the Payments segment has full discretion in determining the fee charged to its customers. The Payments segment is also responsible for providing customer support.

Capitalized contract costs consist of (i) deferred sales commissions that are incremental costs of obtaining customer contracts and (ii) deferred set-up costs, primarily direct payroll costs, for implementation services provided to customers prior to the launching of the Company’s products for general availability (go-live) to customers. Deferred sales commissions are amortized ratably overtwo years, taking into consideration the initial contract term, expected renewal periods, and sales commissions paid on such renewal periods. Deferred set-up costs are amortized ratably over four years which estimates the benefit period of the capitalized costs starting on the go-live date of the service. Deferred sales commissions and deferred set-up costs were included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and were $148,000 and $2,176,000, respectively, at September 30, 2026 and $220,000 and $1,840,000, respectively, at December 31, 2025. The table below shows the amortization of deferred sales commissions and deferred set-up costs, which is included in salaries and employee benefits in the consolidated statements of income:

Given the nature of services provided, the Payments segment does not carry any material contract balances.

The table below shows the Payments segment’s revenue from transaction and network fees from external customers, which are disaggregated by customer category.

Intelligence Segment

The services offered through the Company's Intelligence segment drive efficiency, enhance decision-making, and enable Shippers, Brokers, and Carriers to operate more profitably in a very competitive over-the-road trucking market. With Triumph’s access to data from its Intelligence network and other sources, management believes that Triumph can develop products and services to offer to logistics service providers, allowing them to better plan for peak periods, competitively source freight capacity, and allocate resources efficiently, thus improving their profitability.

The Intelligence segment earns subscription revenue for such services from fees paid by its customers to receive access to the Intelligence platform via a software as a service agreement. Subscription revenue is recorded in Fee Income on the Consolidated Statements of Income and is subject to Topic 606. The customer is charged a monthly fixed subscription fee that is typically billed in arrears with payment due on 30 day terms and as such, no revenue is deferred.

The Intelligence segment's service comprises a single performance obligation to provide stand-ready access to its Intelligence platform for its customers which is satisfied over time as services are rendered. Given the nature of its services and related revenue, no significant judgments are made in applying Topic 606 and there are no refund, warranty, or similar obligations other than standard constrained service level agreements.

The Intelligence segment's contracts with its customers are usuallyone ortwo years in nature and can generally be terminated by either party without a termination penalty or refund if either party gives the other party written notice of non-renewal at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the then-current term. Unless notice is given, the contracts generally renew automatically without any significant material rights. Some of the contracts include tiered pricing, where subscription fees will increase based primarily on an increase in customer revenue; however, such tiered pricing is dependent on customer performance and is constrained until known for revenue recognition purposes. Management has concluded that this tiered pricing approach does not constitute a future material right since changes in the fee ranges are typically offered to classes of customers with similar volume.

The Intelligence segment recognizes fees charged to its customers on a gross basis as subscription revenue as it is the principal in respect of completing Intelligence segment transactions. As a principal to the transaction, the Intelligence segment controls the services on its platforms. The Intelligence segment bears primary responsibility for the fulfillment of the services, contracts directly with its customers, controls the product specifications, and defines the value proposal from its services. Further, the Intelligence segment has full discretion in determining the fee charged to its customers. The Intelligence segment is also responsible for providing customer support.

Capitalized contract costs consist of (i) deferred sales commissions that are incremental costs of obtaining customer contracts and (ii) deferred set-up costs, primarily direct payroll costs, for implementation services provided to customers prior to the launching of the Company’s products for general availability (go-live) to customers. Deferred sales commissions are amortized ratably overtwo years, taking into consideration the initial contract term, expected renewal periods, and sales commissions paid on such renewal periods. Deferred set-up costs are amortized ratably over four years which estimates the benefit period of the capitalized costs starting on the go-live date of the service. Deferred sales commissions and deferred set-up costs were included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and were not significant at September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025. The amortization of deferred sales commissions and deferred set-up costs is included in salaries and employee benefits in the consolidated statements of income and was not significant for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025.

Given the nature of services provided, the Intelligence segment does not carry any material contract balances.

NOTE 16 —LESSOR OPERATING LEASES

On March 20, 2024, the Company purchased a building in Dallas, TX that was intended to be the future headquarters for Triumph Financial. On December 17, 2025, the Company sold the building and will not occupy it in any capacity. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company leased space in the building to tenants under operating leases. The table below shows the Company's revenue from these operating leases, which is included in non-interest income in the Company's consolidated statements of income.

NOTE 17 —BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company's reportable segments are Banking, Factoring, Payments, and Intelligence, which have been determined based upon their business processes and economic characteristics. This determination also gave consideration to the structure and management of various product lines.

The Banking segment includes the operations of TBK Bank. The Banking segment derives its revenue principally from investments in interest earning assets as well as noninterest income typical for the banking industry.

The Factoring segment derives its revenue from factoring services.

The Payments segment includes the presentment, audit, and payment solutions offered to Shipper, Broker, and Factor clients in the trucking industry. The Payments segment derives its revenue from transaction fees and interest income on factored receivables related to invoice payments. These factored receivables consist of (i) invoices where we offer a carrier a quickpay opportunity to receive payment at a discount in advance of the standard payment term for such invoice in exchange for the assignment of such invoice to us, (ii) offering freight brokers the ability to settle their invoices with us on an extended term following our payment to their carriers as an additional liquidity option for such freight brokers, and (iii) factoring transactions where we purchase receivables payable to such freight brokers from their shipper clients. The Payments segment also offer the LoadPay product; a digital banking platform developed for Carriers.

The Intelligence segment was launched at the beginning of the fourth quarter of 2024 to turn the over-the-road trucking data collected through our services into actionable insights for our customers. This launch coincided with our acquisition of the assets of Isometric Technologies Inc. that provides service and performance scoring and benchmarking capabilities to the over-the-road trucking industry. The operations of this segment were further supplemented with our acquisition of Greenscreens AI. Inc., a pricing solution for the logistics industry that delivers short-term freight market pricing intelligence and business insights, during the quarter ended June 30, 2025. Intelligence offerings enable better decision making, market intelligence and automation. The revenue for Intelligence offerings is derived through access and subscription fees, as well as seat licenses where applicable.

The Corporate and Other category consists of other business activities that do not represent a reportable segment.

Expenses that are directly attributable to the Company's Banking, Factoring, Payments, and Intelligence segments such as, but not limited to, occupancy, salaries and benefits to employees that are fully dedicated to the segment, and certain technology costs that can be attributed to specific users or functional areas within the segment are allocated as such. The Company continues to make considerable investments in shared services that benefit the entire organization and these expenses are allocated to the Corporate and Other category. The Company allocates such expenses to the Corporate and Other category in order for the Company's chief operating decision maker and investors to have clear visibility into the operating performance of each reportable segment.

Intersegment interest expense is allocated to the Factoring and Payments segments based on one-month term SOFR for their funding needs. When the Payments segment is self-funded, with customer deposit funding in excess of its factored receivables, intersegment interest income is allocated based on the Federal Funds effective rate. Management believes that such intersegment interest allocations appropriately reflect the current interest rate environment and the relatively quick turn of the underlying receivables.

Reported segments and the financial information of the reported segments are not necessarily comparable with similar information reported by other financial institutions. Additionally, because of the interrelationships of the various segments, the information presented is not indicative of how the segments would perform if they operated as independent entities. Changes in management structure or allocation methodologies and procedures may result in future changes to previously reported segment financial data. The accounting policies of the segments are substantially the same as those described in the “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in Note 1 of the Company’s 2025 Form 10-K.

Transactions between segments consist primarily of borrowed funds, payment network fees, and servicing fees. Intersegment interest expense is allocated to the Factoring and Payments segments as described above. Payment network fees are paid by the Factoring segment to the Payments segment for use of the payments network. Servicing fees are paid by the Payments segment to the Factoring segment for servicing factoring transactions with freight broker clients transferred from the Factoring segment to the Payments segment to align with the supply chain finance product offerings for this business. Servicing fees are paid by the Payments segment to the Factoring segment for servicing such product. The Factoring and Payments segments pay fees to our Banking segment for the Banking segment's execution of various banking services that benefit those segments. Credit loss expense is allocated based on the segment’s ACL determination. Noninterest income and expense directly attributable to a segment are assigned to the related segment. Various shared service costs such as human resources, accounting, finance, risk management and information technology expense are assigned to the Corporate and Other category if they are not directly attributable to a segment. Other segment expense consists of various loan and card related expenses and other insignificant miscellaneous costs not specifically reviewed by the Company's chief operating decision maker. Taxes are paid on a consolidated basis and are not allocated for segment purposes.

(1) Includes revenue and expense from the Company’s holding company, which does not meet the definition of an operating segment. Also includes corporate shared service costs such as the majority of salaries and benefits expense for the Company's executive leadership team, as well as other selling, general, and administrative shared services costs including human resources, accounting, finance, risk management and a significant amount of information technology expense.