Doximity, Inc.

Beginning in April 2024, the Company and certain of our directors and officers have been named in lawsuits in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The first lawsuit is captioned In re Doximity, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 5:24-cv-02281 (N.D. Cal.). The operative complaint brings securities law claims on behalf of a putative class of our investors from June 24, 2021 and August 8, 2023 against the Company and our CEO related to our disclosure of user count and engagement rates. Five shareholder derivative lawsuits have also been filed. Two are consolidated under the caption In re Doximity, Inc. Stockholder Derivative Litigation, No. 5:24-cv-02801 (N.D. Cal.). Two were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, they are captioned Guttman v. Tangney, et al,. 1:24-cv-01387 (D. Del) and Wong v. Tangney, et al., No. 1:25-cv-750 (D. Del.). One was filed in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware with the caption, Stern v. Tangney, et al., No. 2025-0661 (Del. Ch.) The complaints assert claims for, among other things, violations of securities law, breach of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and waste against certain of our directors and officers on a similar basis to the securities lawsuit. The securities lawsuit is currently proceeding in the discovery phase. Other similar lawsuits or proceedings may be initiated in the future. The defendants intend to defend vigorously against these actions.

On June 20, 2025, the Company, its Chief Technology Officer and its Director of AI Products were named as defendants in a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, captioned OpenEvidence Inc. v. Doximity, Inc. et al., No. 1:25-cv-11802-RGS (D. Mass.). On September 17, 2025, the defendants filed their Answer and Counterclaims, in which they asserted counterclaims against the plaintiff including false advertising in violation of the Lanham Act, the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Law, and common law defamation. On October 29, 2025, the plaintiff amended its Complaint, adding Doximity’s subsidiary Pathway Medical, Inc. and certain other individuals as defendants. In its Amended Complaint, the plaintiff alleges the defendants gained unauthorized access to and launched cyberattacks against the defendant’s AI medical information platform. The Amended Complaint asserts claims for violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and trespass to chattels. The Amended Complaint dropped several previously asserted claims against the defendants, including a trade secrets claim under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA). The Amended Complaint requests a permanent injunction enjoining defendants from (i) accessing plaintiff’s platform; and (ii) engaging in any further conduct that violates plaintiff’s rights; an order to return or destroy the plaintiff’s information; actual damages, including lost profits; defendants’ profits and unjust enrichment attributable to the alleged misconduct; among other remedies. The defendants intend to defend vigorously against these claims.

For further discussion of our legal proceedings, please refer to Note 13—Commitments and Contingencies included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.