Brightline Interactive, Inc./NV
For the period ended Jun 30, 2026. Filed Sep 28, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2026 · Filed Sep 28, 2026
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Brightline Interactive, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Brightline Interactive, Inc. (formerly The Glimpse Group, Inc.) (the Company) as of June 30, 2026, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements).
In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2026, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended June 30, 2025, before the adjustments described in Note 5 to retrospectively reflect the discontinued operations presentation, were audited by other auditors whose report dated September 29, 2025, except for Note 16, as to which date is September 28, 2026, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Emphasis of Matter
As discussed in Note 3 and Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company effected a 1-for-8 reverse stock split of its issued and outstanding common stock on September 28, 2026. Accordingly, all share and per-share amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes have been retroactively adjusted for all periods presented to reflect the reverse stock split. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.
Consideration of the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations that raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Audit of Adjustments to the 2025 Consolidated Financial Statements
We also have audited the adjustments described in Note 5 that were applied to the 2025 consolidated financial statements to retrospectively reflect the presentation of all subsidiaries except BLI sub as discontinued operations. In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2025 consolidated financial statements of the Company other than with respect to the adjustments and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2025 consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
I) Revenue Recognition
As described in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company recognizes revenue when it satisfies its performance obligations under contracts with customers, either at a point in time or over time, in accordance with ASC 606. Total revenues for the year ended were $3,659,216, which includes revenue from discontinued operations as disclosed in Note 5. The Company’s revenue streams include recurring revenue from licenses, recurring services, revenue from projects and royalties. For licenses, revenue is recognized at the commencement of the license term, with renewals treated as separate performance obligations recognized no earlier than the beginning of each renewal period, based on management’s assessment that the license grants the customer a right to use the intellectual property as it exists at a point in time. Recurring services revenue is recognized over time, and revenue from projects is recognized at the point in time control transfers to the customer*.*
We identified the evaluation of revenue recognition, including the identification and classification of distinct performance obligations across the Company’s license, recurring services, and project revenue streams, and the determination of the appropriate timing of revenue recognition for each, as a critical audit matter. Auditing this area required especially subjective and complex auditor judgment because (i) determining whether a license, service, or project constitutes one or more distinct performance obligations requires judgement, (ii) evaluating management’s assessment of the point in time at which control transfers to the customer for project revenue involved judgment based on contractual terms and delivery/acceptance evidence that varies by contract, and (iii) determining the appropriate transaction price allocation across performance obligations required evaluation of management’s assumptions.
Our audit procedures related to revenue recognition included the following, among others:
| ● | We obtained an understanding of and evaluated the design of controls over management’s process for identifying performance obligations, determining transaction price, allocating transaction price, and determining the timing of revenue recognition. |
| ● | For a sample of revenue transactions across each material revenue stream (license, recurring services, and projects), we tested management’s application of the five-step revenue recognition model by obtaining and inspecting the underlying statement of work (SoW), customer invoice, evidence of collection, and delivery/acceptance confirmation, and evaluated whether revenue was recognized in the appropriate period and at the appropriate amount based on the terms of each arrangement. |
| ● | For a sample of licenses that were related to renewals, as delivery confirmation for the new performance obligation was not available, we sent confirmations to customers to verify that the service was provided in the correct period. |
| ● | We evaluated the consistency of management’s classification of contracts as licenses, recurring services, or projects with the substance of the underlying agreements and the Company’s accounting policy. |
| ● | We tested the mathematical accuracy of the allocation of transaction price to performance obligations for contracts with multiple performance obligations. |
| ● | We evaluated the Company’s disclosures related to revenue recognition, including disaggregation of revenue, for consistency with the requirements of ASC 606 and with the evidence obtained during our procedures. |
II) Discontinued Operations
As described in Note 5 to the financial statements, the Company divested/wound down certain subsidiaries during the year as part of a strategic business shift. Management evaluated this transaction under ASC 205-20 and determined that it met the criteria for presentation as discontinued operations. As of and for the year ended June 30, 2026, current assets of discontinued operations were $984,159, non-current assets of discontinued operations were $367,138, other current liabilities of discontinued operations were $529,020, long-term liabilities of discontinued operations were $4,704, and loss from discontinued operations was $1,208,953.
We identified management’s evaluation of the divestiture/wind-down of the subsidiaries as meeting the criteria for discontinued operations presentation under ASC 205-20, and the allocation of consolidated balance sheet and results of operations amounts to discontinued operations, as a critical audit matter. Auditing this matter involved especially subjective and complex auditor judgment because (i) evaluating whether the divestiture/wind-down represented a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results, as required by ASC 205-20-45-1B, required judgment regarding the significance and nature of the change to the Company’s operations, and (ii) evaluating the allocation of consolidated balances and results to the discontinued components required judgment, particularly with respect to the manual reclassification of overhead expenses from corporate to the individual subsidiaries, which involved subjective determinations as to which costs were directly attributable to the discontinued components versus costs that should remain within continuing operations.
Our audit procedures related to discontinued operations included the following, among others:
| ● | We obtained and evaluated management’s technical accounting memorandum documenting its assessment of the divestiture/wind-down against the criteria of ASC 205-20, including corroborating evidence such as Board meetings resolving the change in the business direction, shutdown of S5D and Glimpse Learning LLC sale and divestiture agreement. |
| ● | We evaluated whether management’s conclusion that the transaction represented a strategic shift with a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results was consistent with the nature and significance of the subsidiaries divested/wound down relative to the Company as a whole. |
| ● | We obtained the underlying general ledger records supporting the allocation of assets, liabilities, and results of operations to discontinued operations, and independently recalculated the amounts allocated to each subsidiary, agreeing the recalculated totals to the amounts presented as discontinued operations in the financial statements. |
| ● | We tested, the manual reclassifications of overhead expenses from corporate to the individual subsidiaries, evaluating the reasonableness of the basis used by management for the allocation. |
| ● | We evaluated the Company’s disclosures related to discontinued operations for consistency with the requirements of ASC 205-20 and with the evidence obtained during our procedures. |
September 28, 2026
/s/ GreenGrowth CPAs
GreenGrowth CPAs
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2026.
Los Angeles, California
PCAOB ID Number 6580
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Brightline Interactive, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited, before the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively apply the discontinued operations described in Notes 4 and 5, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Brightline Interactive, Inc. (formerly, The Glimpse Group, Inc.) (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2025, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements, before the effects of the adjustments to retrospectively apply the discontinued operations described in Notes 4 and 5, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2025, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the adjustments to retrospectively apply the discontinued operations described in Note 4 and Note 5 and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance about whether such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied. Those adjustments were audited by GreenGrowth CPAs.
Explanatory Paragraph – Going Concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has recurring losses since its inception and the Company’s current assets may not be sufficient to fund operations and other commitments for at least the next twelve months from the date of issuance of these financial statements. Management’s plan regarding these matters are described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Turner, Stone & Company, L.L.P.
Turner, Stone & Company, L.L.P.
We served as the Company’s auditor from 2023 to 2025.
Dallas, Texas
September 29, 2025, except for the effect of the reverse stock split described in Notes 3 and 16, as to which the date is September 28, 2026
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.