GREENWAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

Note 1 -Organization and Nature of Operations

Organization and Nature of Operations

Greenway Technologies, Inc. (collectively, “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company”), through its wholly owned subsidiary, Greenway Innovative Energy, Inc., is primarily engaged in the research, development and commercialization of a proprietary Gas-to-Liquids (GTL) syngas conversion system that can be economically scaled to meet individual natural gas field/resource requirements. The Company’s proprietary and patented technology has been realized in Greenway’s first generation commercial-scale G-ReformerTM unit (“G-Reformer”), a unique and critical component of the Company’s overall GTL technology solution. Greenway’s objective is to become a material direct and licensed producer of renewable GTL synthesized diesel and jet fuels, with a near term focus on U.S. market opportunities.

Both of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries: Universal Media Corp and Logistix Technology Systems, Inc. are currently inactive.

Liquidity, Going Concern and Management’s Plans

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business.

As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, for the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company had:

For the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company incurred a net loss of $1,957,734 and used $710,289 in cash from operating activities.

These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year from the date the financial statements are issued.

Management’s plans these conditions include:

There can be no assurance that these plans will be successfully implemented. Accordingly, substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern persists.

The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Note 2 -Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Greenway and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

**Business Segments **

The Company uses the “management approach” to identify its reportable segments. The management approach requires companies to report segment financial information consistent with information used by management for making operating decisions and assessing performance as the basis for identifying the Company’s reportable segments. The Company has identified one single reportable operating segment. The Company manages its business on the basis of one operating and reportable segment and derives revenues from selling its product and related services.

Preparing financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and those estimates may be material.

Changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and other assumptions, which include both quantitative and qualitative assessments that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances.

Significant estimates during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, include valuation of stock-based compensation, uncertain tax positions, and the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company accounts for financial instruments under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 820,Fair Value Measurements. ASC 820 provides a framework for measuring fair value and requires disclosures regarding fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, based on the Company’s principal or, in absence of a principal, most advantageous market for the specific asset or liability.

The Company uses a three-tier fair value hierarchy to classify and disclose all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, as well as assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, in periods subsequent to their initial measurement. The hierarchy requires the Company to use observable inputs when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs, when determining fair value.

The three tiers are defined as follows:

The determination of fair value and the assessment of a measurement’s placement within the hierarchy requires judgment. Level 3 valuations often involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity. Level 3 valuations may require the use of various cost, market, or income valuation methodologies applied to unobservable management estimates and assumptions. Management’s assumptions could vary depending on the asset or liability valued and the valuation method used. Such assumptions could include estimates of prices, earnings, costs, actions of market participants, market factors, or the weighting of various valuation methods. The Company may also engage external advisors to assist us in determining fair value, as appropriate.

Although the Company believes that the recorded fair value of our financial instruments is appropriate, these fair values may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values.

The Company’s financial instruments, including cash, accounts payable and accrued expenses, accounts payable and accrued expenses – related parties, advances and various debt instruments are carried at historical cost. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, the carrying amounts of these instruments approximated their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments.

ASC 825-10*“Financial Instruments”* allows entities to voluntarily choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value (“fair value option”). The fair value option may be elected on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable unless a new election date occurs. If the fair value option is elected for an instrument, unrealized gains and losses for that instrument should be reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The Company did not elect to apply the fair value option to any outstanding financial instruments.

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Concentration of Credit Risk

For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the purchase date and money market accounts to be cash equivalents.

At December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, the Company didnot have any cash equivalents.

The Company is exposed to credit risk on its cash and cash equivalents in the event of default by the financial institutions to the extent account balances exceed the amount insured by the FDIC, which is $250,000. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, the Company didnot have any cash in excess of the insured FDIC limit.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

Management evaluates the recoverability of the Company’s identifiable intangible assets and other long-lived assets when events or circumstances indicate a potential impairment exists, in accordance with the provisions of ASC 360-10-35-15*“Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.”* Events and circumstances considered by the Company in determining whether the carrying value of identifiable intangible assets and other long-lived assets may not be recoverable include but are not limited to: significant changes in performance relative to expected operating results; significant changes in the use of the assets; significant negative industry or economic trends; and changes in the Company’s business strategy. In determining if impairment exists, the Company estimates the undiscounted cash flows to be generated from the use and ultimate disposition of these assets.

If impairment is indicated based on a comparison of the assets’ carrying values and the undiscounted cash flows, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.

**Property and Equipment **

Expenditures for repair and maintenance which do not materially extend the useful lives of property and equipment are charged to operations. When property and equipment is sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts with the resulting gain or loss reflected in operations.

Management reviews the carrying value of its property and equipment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.

Derivative Liabilities

The Company analyzes all financial instruments with features of both liabilities and equity under FASB ASC Topic No. 480, (“ASC 480”), “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” and FASB ASC Topic No. 815, (“ASC 815”)“Derivatives and Hedging”. Derivative liabilities are adjusted to reflect fair value at each reporting period, with any increase or decrease in the fair value recorded in the results of operations (other income/expense) as change in fair value of derivative liabilities. The Company uses a binomial pricing model to determine fair value of these instruments.

Upon conversion or repayment of a debt instrument in exchange for shares of common stock, where the embedded conversion option has been bifurcated and accounted for as a derivative liability (generally convertible debt and warrants), the Company records the shares of common stock at fair value, relieves all related debt, derivatives, and debt discounts, and recognizes a net gain or loss on debt extinguishment.

Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification under ASC Topic 815 are reclassified to liabilities at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date.

At December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, the Company hadno derivative liabilities.

Debt Discount

For certain notes issued, the Company may provide the debt holder with an original issue discount. The original issue discount is recorded as a debt discount, reducing the face amount of the note, and is amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Debt Issue Cost

Debt issuance cost paid to lenders, or third parties are recorded as debt discounts and amortized to interest expense over the life of the underlying debt instrument, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income tax using the asset and liability method prescribed by ASC 740,“Income Taxes”. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates that will be in effect in the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company records a valuation allowance to offset deferred tax assets if based on the weight of available evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized as income or loss in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company follows the accounting guidance for uncertainty in income taxes using the provisions of ASC 740 “Income Taxes”. Using that guidance, tax positions initially need to be recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively, the Company hadno uncertain tax positions that qualify for either recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain income tax positions in other expense. No interest and penalties related to uncertain income tax positions were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Research and Development

The Company accounts for research and development costs in accordance with ASC subtopic 730-10, Research and Development (“ASC 730-10”).

Under ASC 730-10, all research and development costs must be charged to expense as incurred. Accordingly, internal research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Third-party research and development costs are expensed when the contracted work has been performed or as milestone results have been achieved as defined under the applicable agreement. Company-sponsored research and development costs related to both present and future products are expensed in the period incurred.

The Company incurred research and development expenses of $1,205,335 and $50,000 for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for our stock-based compensation under ASC 718*“Compensation – Stock Compensation”* using the fair value-based method. Under this method, compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period. This guidance establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges it equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments.

The Company uses the fair value method for equity instruments granted to non-employees and use the Black-Scholes model or a binomial method for measuring the fair value of options.

The fair value of stock-based compensation is determined as of the date of the grant or the date at which the performance of the services is completed (measurement date) and is recognized over the vesting periods.

When determining fair value, the Company considers the following assumptions in the Black-Scholes model:

Stock Warrants

In connection with certain financing, consulting and collaboration arrangements, the Company may issue warrants to purchase shares of its common stock. The outstanding warrants are standalone instruments that are not puttable or mandatorily redeemable by the holder and are classified as equity awards. The Company measures the fair value of the awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model as of the measurement date. Warrants issued in conjunction with the issuance of common stock are initially recorded at fair value as a reduction in additional paid-in capital of the common stock issued. All other warrants are recorded at fair value as expense over the requisite service period or at the date of issuance if there is not a service period.

Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Share

Pursuant to ASC 260-10-45, basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the periods presented. Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock, common stock equivalents and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive common shares may consist of common stock issuable for stock options and warrants (using the treasury stock method), convertible notes and common stock issuable. These common stock equivalents may be dilutive in the future.

At December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, the Company had the following common stock equivalents outstanding, which are potentially dilutive equity securities:

On October 31, 2025, the Company entered into a settlement agreement related to litigation with plaintiffs Ric Halden, Randy Moseley, Tunstall Canyon Group, LLC and Chisos Equity Consultants, LLC. Due to the settlement, the note payable to Tunstall Canyons Group, LLC, which held the debt convertible into warrants, was completely settled. As a result, the warrants were cancelled by operation of the settlement.

Related Parties

Parties are considered to be related to the Company if the parties, directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, control, are controlled by, or are under common control with the Company.

Related parties also include principal owners of the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal owners of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal with if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

Accounting Pronouncements

The Company follows Accounting Standards Update 2023-07 – Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Reportable Segment Disclosures (“ASU 2023-07”), which expands reportable segment information by requiring companies to disclose, on an annual and interim basis, significant reportable segment expenses that are regularly provided to the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) and included within each reported measure of a segment’s profit of loss. ASU 2023-07 also requires disclosure of the title and position of the individual identified as the CODM and an explanation of how the CODM makes decisions about allocating resources to segments and evaluating performance.

The Company operates as a single reportable segment focused on GTL development and commercialization of the technology.

The CODM is the Chief Executive Officer.

Note 3 –Notes Payable

Notes payable and related terms were as follows:

Note 4 –Notes Payable – Related Parties

The Company executed a loan agreement for up to $5,000,000 in advances with a Company owned by a stockholder is the brother of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer as well as the Company’s Executive Vice President – Sales and a member of the Board of Directors.

Mr. Robert K. Jones and his late wife and Mabert have loaned a total of $2,057,341 to the Company and four other shareholders have loaned a balance of $793,433, pursuant to the Loan Agreement, through the year ended December 31, 2025. These loans are secured by the assets of our Company. A financing statement and UCC-1 have been filed according to Texas statutes. Should a default under the Loan Agreement occur, there could be a foreclosure or a bankruptcy proceeding filed by Mabert on behalf of the lenders party to the Loan Agreement. A foreclosure sale or distribution through bankruptcy could only result in the creditors receiving a pro-rata payment based on the terms of the Loan Agreement. Mabert did not nor will it receive cash compensation for its efforts.

The notes bear interest ranging from 10% -18%. These notes are in default at December 31, 2025.

Typically, with each of these notes, the Company has issued shares of common stock, which have been recognized as a debt discount and amortized over the life of the note.

During 2025, the Company did not issue notes under this loan structure and therefore, did not issue shares in connection with such note structure.

Notes payable – related parties consist of loans from various members of management and the Board of Directors, typically for use as working capital. Related terms were as follows:

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, total accrued interest for Notes Payable-Related Parties was $2,677,058 and $2,427,321, respectively, and is presented as part of Accounts payable and accrued expenses – related parties. The Company recorded interest expense from Notes Payable-Related Parties for fiscal years ending December 31, 2025 and 2024, of $495,214 and $495,279, respectively.

**Note 5 –Convertible Note Payable **

Convertible note payable and related terms were as follows:

As of December 31, 2025 and 2023, total accrued interest for Convertible Notes Payable was $-0- and $188,567, respectively. The Company recorded interest expense from Convertible Notes Payable for fiscal years ending December 31, 2024 and 2023, of $24,985 and $30,082, respectively.

On October 31, 2025, the Company entered into a settlement agreement related to litigation with plaintiffs Ric Halden, Randy Moseley, Tunstall Canyon Group, LLC and Chisos Equity Consultants, LLC. Due to the settlement, the note payable to Tunstall Canyons Group, LLC, which held the debt convertible into warrants, was completely settled. As a result, the warrants were cancelled by operation of the settlement.

The interest expense in 2025 was accrued from January 1, 2025 through the date of settlement on October 31, 2025.

Note 6 –Employment Agreements – Related Parties

In August 2012, we entered into an employment agreement with Raymond Wright, for the position of president of GIE, for a term offive years, with compensation of $90,000 per year. In September 2014, Mr. Wright’s employment agreement was amended to increase his annual pay to $180,000. By its terms, Mr. Wright’s employment agreement automatically renewed on August 12, 2020, 2021, 2022 2023, 2024 and 2025, for successive one-year periods. During the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we paid and/or accrued a total of $180,000 under the terms of the agreement. As of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, total accrued salary was $1,635,938 and $1,599,738, respectively, and is presented as part of Accounts payable and accrued expenses -related party. Mr. Wright is also the Chairman of our Board of Directors and Interim President.

Effective May 10, 2018, we entered into an employment agreement with Ransom Jones, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer and a member of the board of directors. Mr. Jones earns a base salary of $120,000 per year. During each year that Mr. Jones’ agreement is in effect, he is entitled to receive a bonus (“Bonus”) equal to at least Thirty-Five Thousand Dollars ($35,000) per year, such amount having been accrued for the period ended December 31, 2025. Mr. Jones received a grant of common stock (the “Stock Grant”) at the start of his employment equal to 250,000 shares each of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share (the “Common Stock”), such shares vesting immediately. Mr. Jones is also entitled to participate in the Company’s benefit plans when such plans exist. The foregoing summary of Mr. Jones’s employment agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the actual true and correct Employment Agreement by and between Mr. Jones and our Company, dated May 10, 2018, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 10.40 to this Form 10-K and incorporated by reference herein. By its terms, Mr. Jones’ employment agreement automatically renewed on May 10,2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025, for successive one-year periods. twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, we paid and/or accrued a total of $120,000, respectively, under the terms of the agreement. As of December 31, 2025, total accrued salary was $884,667 and, as of December 31,2024, the total accrued salary was $889,167 and is presented as part of Accounts payable and accrued expenses – related parties.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the accrued salary from employment agreements and accrued interest for Notes Payable Related Parties totaling $5,197,663 and $4,916,226, respectively are presented as Accounts payable and accrued expensed – related parties.

Note 7 –Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters

On September 7, 2021, the Company was served with a demand for mediation and potential arbitration by Gregory Sanders, a previous employee of the Company. The demand claims Mr. Sanders had an employment agreement with the Company entitling him to certain compensation payments under the contract. No conclusion was made during mediation which occurred in the fourth quarter of 2021. On October 25, 2023, there was a hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgement. Plaintiff asserted 3 motions, all of which were denied by the court, as ordered on November 1, 2023. Plaintiff withdrew his action against the Company on January 11, 2024 and the court so ordered on the same date.

On November 8, 2023, the Company was served with a demand for payments under various agreements with the plaintiffs. The Plaintiffs are Ric Halden, Randy Moseley, Tunstall Canyon Group, LLC (“Tunstall Canyon”) and Chisos Equity Consultants, LLC (“Chisos”). Ric Halden and Randy Moseley were founders of the Company and served as officers and directors of the Company until 2017, when each of them resigned all positions with the Company. The Company believes that Tunstall Canyon and Chisos are majority-owned by Ric Halden. As of June 30, 2025, the Company had accrued liabilities in the amount of $1,672,074 to Ric Halden, Randy Moseley and Tunstall Canyon, which are all included in the liabilities reflected on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The court set an original trial date for November 25, 2024. The Plaintiffs and the Company petitioned the Court for a new trial date, which was granted and a new trial date was set for May 26, 2025. On March 28, 2025, Plaintiffs and the Company again petitioned the Court for a new trial date. The request was granted and the trial was reset set for September 15, 2025. Trial was subsequently reset to December 1, 2025.

The Plaintiffs, Ric Halden, Randy Moseley, Tunstall Canyon and Chisos, filed a Traditional Motion for Partial Summary Judgement , or in the Alternative, Traditional Motion for Partial Summary Judgement as to Liability Only which was originally set to be set to be heard by the Court on March 26, 2025. Plaintiffs and the Company agreed to reset the hearing to at least 45 days after March 26, 2025. A new hearing date was set for July 9, 2025.

The Plaintiffs, Ric Halden, Randy Moseley, Tunstall Canyon and Chisos, filed a Traditional Motion for Partial Summary Judgement, or in the Alternative, Traditional Motion for Partial Summary Judgement as to Liability Only which was originally set to be heard by the Court on March 26, 2025. Plaintiffs and the Company agreed to reset the hearing to at least 45 days after March 26, 2025. On April 29, 2025, Tunstall Canyon, LLC filed a second traditional motion for partial summary judgement. The hearing was set for July 19, 2025. The Company did not challenge the motion and on July 9, 2025, the court granted a summary judgement in the amount of $335,234 plus prejudgement interest at a rate of 18% per year from January 1, 2025, until the date of a Final Judgement in the case. The amount payable to Tunstall Canyon is fully recorded as a liability by the Company.

On October 30, 2025, this dispute was fully resolved on the following terms:(1) Greenway to issue Ric Halden 2,000,000 shares of restricted stock in Greenway by November 6, 2025 (representing a value of $80,000 at a price of $.04 per share); (2) Greenway to make a payment to Plaintiffs in the amount of $50,000 by February 27, 2026; (3) Greenway to pay $900,000 in twelve (12) monthly installments beginning on August 1, 2026. Greenway’s payment obligations will be secured by an Agreed Judgment in the amount of $1,250,000 that will held in trust by Plaintiff’s counsel and only filed with a court in the event of a non-cured default by Greenway. In exchange for these obligations, the lawsuit will be dismissed and Plaintiffs will execute a release of all claims against Greenway that could have been brought in the litigation. This includes the withdrawal of the summary judgement granted to Tunstall Canyon by the court on July 9, 2025 in the amount of $335,234 plus prejudgement interest at a rate of 18% per year from January 1, 2025. Further, Plaintiff, Randy Moseley, relinquished his claims against the Company. The Company reflected a liability to Randy Moseley in the amount of $714,663 as of September 30, 2025.

On December 9, 2025, the court approved an AGREED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE.

The Company recognized a gain of $648,783 related to the legal settlement.

The Company is subject to litigation, claims, investigations, and audits arising from time to time in the ordinary course of business. Although legal proceedings are inherently unpredictable, the Company believes that it has valid defenses with respect to any matters currently pending against the Company and intends to defend itself vigorously.

**Note 8 –Stockholders’ Deficit **

The Company has one (1) class of stock:

Common Stock

Equity Transactions for the Year Ended December 31, 2025

Stock Issued for Cash

The Company issued 22,523,333 shares of common stock for $458,500 ($0.02 - $0.10/share).

Stock Issued for Legal Settlement

The Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock in settlement of accrued liabilities totaling $83,500, ($0.0417/share). The fair value of these shares was based upon the quoted closing trading price. The Company recognized a gain of $648,783 related to the legal settlement.

Stock Issued for prepaid legal fees

The Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock for prepaid legal services totaling $100,000, ($0.10/share). The share price was negotiated between the parties.

Equity Transactions for the Year Ended December 31, 2024

Stock Issued for Cash

The Company issued 22,578,333 shares of common stock for $458,500 ($0.01 - $0.03/share).

Stock Issued for Settlement of Liabilities

The Company issued 4,415,334 shares of common stock in settlement of accrued liabilities totaling $77,930, ($0.015 - $0.03/share). The fair value of these shares was based upon the quoted closing trading price. In connection with this settlement, there was no gain or loss on settlement.

Note 9 –Warrants

There was no warrant activity for the years ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024.

Note 10 –Income Taxes

The Company’s tax expense differs from the “expected” tax expense for the period (computed by applying the corporate tax rate of 21% to loss before taxes), are approximately as follows:

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2025 and 2024 are approximately as follows:

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed by applying the federal and state income tax rates in effect to the gross amounts of temporary differences and other tax attributes, such as net operating loss carryforwards. In assessing if the deferred tax assets will be realized, the Company considers whether it is more likely than not that some or all of these deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the period in which these deductible temporary differences reverse.

During the year ended December 31, 2025, the valuation allowance increased by approximately $400,000 The total valuation allowance results from the Company’s estimate of its uncertainty in being unable to recover its net deferred tax assets.

At December 31, 2025, the Company has federal net operating loss carryforwards, which are available to offset future taxable income, of approximately $34,040,800. The Company is in the process of analyzing their NOL and has not determined if the Company has had any change of control issues that could limit the future use of these NOL’s.

NOL carryforwards that were generated after 2017 of approximately $34,040,800 may only be used to offset 80% of taxable income and are carried forward indefinitely.

These carryforwards may be subject to an annual limitation under Section 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and similar state provisions if the Company experienced one or more ownership changes which would limit the amount of NOL and tax credit carryforwards that can be utilized to offset future taxable income and tax, respectively. In general, an ownership change, as defined by Section 382 and 383, results from transactions increasing ownership of certain stockholders or public groups in the stock of the corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three- year period. The Company has not completed an IRC Section 382/383 analysis. If a change in ownership were to have occurred, NOL and tax credit carryforwards could be eliminated or restricted.

If eliminated, the related asset would be removed from the deferred tax asset schedule with a corresponding reduction in the valuation allowance. Due to the existence of the valuation allowance, limitations created by future ownership changes, if any, will not impact the Company’s effective tax rate.

The Company files corporate income tax returns in the United States and Texas jurisdictions. Due to the Company’s net operating loss posture, all tax years are open and subject to income tax examination by tax authorities. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest expense and penalties related to income tax matters as tax expense. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, there wereno unrecognized tax benefits, and there are no significant accruals for interest related to unrecognized tax benefits or tax penalties.

As of December 31, 2025, the Company had not filed any corporate tax returns since the year ended December 31, 2016. The Company’s failure to file penalties are immaterial.

Note 11 –Forfeiture of Customer Deposit

During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company recognized $1,700,000 as other income related to the forfeiture of customer deposits.

In May 2025, the Company entered into a term sheet with a third party pursuant to which the third party paid deposits totaling $1,700,000 in contemplation of entering into definitive agreements for the purchase and deployment of a G-Reformer unit. The term sheet provided that $1,300,000 of the deposits were non-refundable if definitive agreements were not executed. No definitive agreements were executed, and the third party did not proceed with the contemplated transaction.

The deposits had previously been recorded as customer deposits (a contract liability) on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. During 2025, management evaluated the status of the arrangement and determined that no performance obligations remained, no definitive agreements had been executed, and no refund obligation existed. Accordingly, the Company concluded that the related liability was extinguished and recognized $1,700,000 as income during the year ended December 31, 2025.

The forfeiture is non-recurring in nature and is presented separately within other income in the consolidated statement of operations.

Note 12 –Subsequent Events

From January 1, 2026 through March 11, 2026, the Company issued 9,973,333 shares of Rule 144 restricted Common Stock in private placements to 17 accredited investors at $0.02 - $0.03 per share.