AMAZE HOLDINGS, INC.

We may be subject to legal disputes and subject to claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. Except as set forth below, we are not a party or subject to any pending legal proceedings the resolution of which is expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows or financial condition.

Michaels v. Amaze Holdings, Inc.:

Lawsuit filed in 2022 alleging breach of plaintiff’s separation agreement. At trial the jury awarded $585,976.25. Judgment was entered in 2024 and now exceeds $600,000 with additional awards of interest and costs. Mr. Michaels has commenced garnishment proceedings against certain of the Company’s bank accounts and other third parties and is seeking the appointment of a limited receiver over the Company’s assets in an attempt to collect on the judgment and such proceedings remain pending. The Company appealed the verdict, and the court of appeals affirmed the judgment in February 2025, which granted approximately $22,000 in additional damages to Mr. Michaels. On March 12, 2025, the Company petitioned the supreme court for review. On May 13, 2025, the supreme court denied the petition. At December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, $27,384 and $484,735, respectively, was accrued as a settlement payable. On November 21, 2025, the Company tendered full payment of the judgment based on calculations of Mr. Michaels’ former counsel, but Mr. Michaels refused to recognize the satisfaction. The Company filed a motion to compel satisfaction of the judgment after tendering an additional $25,000 for interest, and that motion remains pending.

Dubow Decorating, Inc. v. Amaze Software, Inc.:

Amaze Software, Inc. is the Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff in Dubow Decorating, Inc. v. Amaze Software Inc., Case No. 05-CV-25-699, in the Benton County District Court, State of Minnesota, filed on April 16, 2025. Dubow Decorating, Inc. (“Dubow”) was a vendor for Amaze and provided printing services. Dubow sued Amaze claiming $394,000 in damages for Amaze’s failure to pay certain invoices, and Amaze asserted several defenses based on quality of services, discrepancies with Dubow’s invoices and its admitted overbilling. Amaze also asserted counterclaims against Dubow for defamation and tortious interference with Amaze’s other vendor relationships. The litigation is in its early stages and the parties will soon be conducting discovery. In November 2025, the Company settled the lawsuit for $185,000 with monthly payments to be made through September 2026.

G&I IX Aviation LLC v. Teespring, Inc. et al.

Amaze Holding Company LLC is a defendant inG&I IX Aviation LLC v. Teespring, Inc. et al., Case No. 23-CI-00220 in Boone County Circuit Court, Kentucky. When Amaze acquired certain assets of Teespring, Inc., pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement in November 2022, Teespring, Inc. leased commercial property located at 1201 Aviation Boulevard, Hebron, Kentucky, owned by Plaintiff G&I IX Aviation LLC (“G&I”). During and after APA negotiations, Amaze attempted to assume the lease, but Plaintiff refused to consent to the assignment of the lease unless Amaze paid previous obligations the landlord claimed Teespring. Inc. owed. Ultimately, G&I and Amaze never signed a consent to assignment of the lease. Plaintiff provided a notice of default on December 15, 2022, and filed its complaint against Teespring, Inc. and Amaze on February 1, 2023. Plaintiff demands $868,513.34 in unpaid rent plus attorneys’ fees On June 12, 2024, the court denied Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against Amaze. Plaintiff filed a second motion for summary judgment on August 28, 2025. On February 13, 2026, the Court granted Plaintiff’s second motion for summary judgment and awarded liquidated damages in the amount of $1,311,98.53, plus court costs and reasonable attorney fees in an amount to be determined, which shall bear post judgment interest at the 6% statutory rate. On March 20, 2026, Amaze requested that the Court reduce the award by approximately $205,000 in unreasonable fees and costs. Amaze plans to appeal the decision when it becomes final.

DinoCloud, Inc. v. Amaze Software, Inc.

Amaze Software, Inc. is the Defendant inDinoCloud, Inc. v. Amaze Software, Inc., Case No. N24C-02-496 PAW, in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County, filed on February 25, 2025 and served on the Company on April 28, 2025. Plaintiff alleges breach of contract, breach of good faith and fair dealing, detrimental reliance, and unjust enrichment and claims $202,000 in damages. The Company filed its answer and affirmative defenses on July 17, 2025. Discovery is ongoing.

Baron App, Inc. dba Cameo v. Amaze Holding Company LLC

Amaze Holding Company LLC is the Defendant inBaron App, Inc., dba Cameo v. Amaze Holding Company LLC, Case No. 30-2025-01486631-CU-BC-NJC, in the Superior Court of California, County of Orange. Plaintiff filed the Complaint on May 30, 2025. Plaintiff alleges breach of contract and damages in subject to proof in excess of $140,000. Mercer Oak filed the Company’s Answer and Affirmative Defenses on July 15, 2025. An initial Case Management Conference took place October 28, 2025. The parties have started discovery. As of March 2026, the parties have reached a tentative settlement of approximately $140,000, which they are working to document.