Skip to main content

Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Mar 12, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2025 · Filed Mar 12, 2026

HEPA$0.11-13.7%Stored close · as of Nov 10, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hepion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Substantial Doubt about the Company’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company’s significant operating losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

January 2025 Common Stock and Warrant Transaction – Refer to Note 4 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

On January 23, 2025, the Company completed a public offering of 553,846 shares of common stock (or pre-funded warrants in lieu thereof) with each share of common stock (or pre-funded warrant) accompanied by (i) a series A common warrant to purchase one (1) common share at an exercise price of $20.00 per share and (ii) a series B common warrant to purchase one (1) common share at an exercise price of $20.00 per share, generating total gross cash proceeds of $9.0 million. The exercise periods for the Series A and B warrants are five years and two and half years, respectively. The Series B warrants have an alternate cashless exercise of one warrant for three common shares. The Company accounted for Series A and Series B warrants as liability awards and the Pre-Funded Warrant as permanent equity.

The company estimated the fair value at issuance using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. This method of valuation involves using inputs such as the fair value of the common stock, historical volatility, the contractual term of the warrants, risk-free interest rates and dividend yields. The Company then performed a back solve that contemplated a discount for lack of marketability and dilution adjustments. At issuance, the Company recorded liabilities for the initial fair values of $1.3 million for the Series A warrants and $5.4 million for the Series B warrants.

The principal consideration for our determination that the evaluation of this transaction was a critical audit matter is the high degree of subjectivity and judgment by management in determining (1) the accounting conclusions related to the treatment of warrants issued (2) the fair values of the warrants given the sensitivity of the underlying significant assumptions specifically thediscount for lack of marketability and dilution adjustments. Auditing these elements involved especially challenging and subjective auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of audit effort required to address these matters, including the extent of specialized skill or knowledge needed.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures performed to address this critical audit matter included the following, among others:

●We evaluated the appropriateness of management’s accounting conclusions related to the treatment of the warrants as liability or equity instruments.
●We involved our fair value specialist who assisted in evaluating the reasonableness of management’s valuation methodology and the significant assumptions used in the valuation models, including the discount for lack of marketability and dilution adjustments.
●We evaluated the competency and objectivity of management’s expert engaged to perform the valuation.

/s/ GRASSI & CO., CPAs, P.C.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2023.

Jericho, New York

March 11, 2026

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.