Marygold Companies, Inc.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIALS STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

The Marygold Companies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Company,” “The Marygold Companies,” “we,” “our,” or “us”), is a holding company which operates through its wholly owned subsidiaries on a multinational scale that is focused upon exchange traded funds management, financial services and certain other business activities listed below:

While the Company operates in several business segments, its primary business focus is the financial services industry, including ETF management, and its intention is to continue developing these and similar business segments prospectively.

The Company manages the operations of its subsidiaries and their related businesses on a decentralized basis. There are generally no centralized or integrated operational functions such as marketing, sales, or other synergistic services and there is little involvement by our executive management in the day-to-day business affairs of the Company’s subsidiaries apart from oversight. Our executive management team is primarily responsible for vision and strategy of the Company while effectively implementing capital allocation decisions, investment activities, leadership talent selection, development, performance and retention of the management executives to head each of the operating subsidiaries. The Company’s executive management is also responsible for organizational accountability, corporate governance practices, monitoring regulatory affairs, including those of our operating businesses and involvement in governance-related issues of its subsidiaries as needed.

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation and Accounting Principles

The Company has prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements on a consolidated basis. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets, related statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity and cash flows include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, necessary for their fair presentation, prepared on an accrual basis, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete audited financial statements. Operating results for the three and six months ended December 31, 2025 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending June 30, 2026. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2025, has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2025, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete audited financial statements. The information included in this Report should be read in conjunction with information included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for year ended June 30, 2025.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which are referred herein as the “Financial Statements”, include the accounts of The Marygold Companies and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Our subsidiary USCF Investments relies on the revenues generated from investment management fees from the funds it manages. The concentration of fund management revenue and related receivables were (dollars in thousands):

There are no significant concentrations for the other operating subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (Topic 740). The guidance requires disclosure of disaggregated income taxes paid, prescribes standardized categories for the components of the effective tax rate reconciliation, and modifies other income tax-related disclosures. The standard will be effective for us beginning with our annual reporting for fiscal year 2026, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our income tax disclosures.

In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets. This update introduces a practical expedient and an accounting policy election intended to simplify the application of the credit loss model to current accounts receivable and contract assets arising from transactions accounted for under Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The practical expedient allows entities to assume that current conditions as of the balance sheet date remain unchanged for the remaining life of the asset. ASU 2025-05 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2025, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2025-05 on its financial statements.

NOTE 3. NET LOSS PER SHARE

Basic net loss per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. This calculation includes the weighted average number of shares of Series B, Voting, Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred Stock”) outstanding as they are deemed to be substantially similar to the common shares and shareholders are entitled to the same liquidation and dividend rights and each share of Series B Preferred Stock is convertible at any time into 20 shares of the Company’s common stock. Diluted net loss per share is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Since the Company generated a net loss in the three and six months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, basic and diluted net loss per share were the same. The Company excluded the following shares from the diluted net loss per share calculation as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

Basic and diluted net loss per share reflects the effects of shares potentially issuable upon conversion of the convertible Series B Preferred Stock.

The components of basic and diluted earnings per share were as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

NOTE 4. CERTAIN BALANCE SHEET DETAILS

The components of certain balance sheet line items are as follows (in thousands).

Depreciation expense for property and equipment was approximately $0.1 million for the three and six months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

The $1.8 million investment included in “Other assets, non-current” above represents an equity interest of less than 10% in a domestic financial institution and the $0.5 million investment represents a 10% equity interest in a registered investment advisor. These equity interests do not have readily determinable fair values and are measured at cost minus impairment. There have been no impairments, downwards adjustments, or upward adjustments during the periods presented or cumulatively.

NOTE 5. INVESTMENTS

USCF Investments, from time to time, provides initial seed capital in connection with the organization of exchange traded products (ETPs) or exchange traded funds (ETFs) that are managed by USCF LLC or USCF Advisers. USCF Investments classifies these investments as current assets as these investments are generally sold within one year of the balance sheet date. Investments in which no controlling financial interest or significant influence exist are recorded at fair value with the change included in earnings in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of December 31, 2025 and June 30, 2025, the Company held a total of $1.9 million and $3.6 million, respectively, in funds managed by USCF Advisers which are related parties and are included in other equities in the table below. In addition to the seed capital holdings in these funds, the Company also invests in marketable securities.

All of the Company’s short-term investments are classified as Level 1 assets and consist of the following (in thousands):

During the six months ended December 31, 2025 and year ended June 30, 2025, respectively, there were no transfers between the fair value levels.

NOTE 6. SALE OF BRIGADIER

On June 17, 2025, the independent members of the board of directors of the Company were presented with a proposed transaction for the sale of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Brigadier Security Systems (2000) Ltd., a Canadian registered corporation (“Brigadier”). The independent members of the board of directors reviewed an independent valuation of the fair market value of Brigadier and based upon such valuation and their review of the terms of the proposed transaction, approved the transaction.

On June 19, 2025, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement (“Agreement”) with SKCAL LLC, an Arizona limited liability company (“SKCAL”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to SKCAL all of the shares of stock (“Shares”) that it owns in its wholly owned subsidiary, Brigadier. Scott Schoenberger, a director and a 10.9% shareholder of the Company, is the sole member of SKCAL. The closing (“Closing”) of the sale of Shares took place on July 1, 2025, (“Closing Date”).

Pursuant to the Agreement, the purchase price for the Shares acquired by SKCAL at Closing was $2.2 million subject to certain adjustments thereto. An initial payment of $0.2 million was paid within a few days of the execution and delivery of the Agreement by the parties. An additional $1.0 million was paid near the Closing Date, of which $0.5 million was received as of June 30, 2025. A final payment of $1.0 million was payable on September 1, 2025, subject to adjustment upward or downward thereto in the event of a difference between the Closing Date schedule of Brigadier’s current assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2025 (“Target Balance Sheet”), and the schedule of Brigadier’s audited current assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2025 (“Final Balance Sheet”), including adjustments in the event accounts receivable become uncollectable, cash balances increase or decrease, and/or any liabilities arise prior to Closing but which were not set forth on such Target Balance Sheet. After a comparison of the Final Balance Sheet and the Target Balance Sheet, it was determined and agreed that an upwards adjustment of $0.1 million be added to the purchase price resulting in the final payment amount being $1.1 million.

The audit committee of the Company continued to have oversight of the transaction through the Closing Date of July 1, 2025, and the final payment adjustment procedures concluding on September 1, 2025. While the Chief Operating Decision Maker evaluated the security systems segment for operational purposes through June 30, 2025, this was not considered a significant operation to the Company during the years ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. As of June 30, 2025, Brigadier had total assets of $1.7 million and total liabilities of $0.3 million. The Company received total proceeds of $2.3 million for the sale and had a cost basis in Brigadier of $1.8 million and thus recorded a gain on the sale of Brigadier of $0.5 million.

NOTE 7. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Total amortization expense for intangible assets was $0.1 million for each of the three months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 and $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the six months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

In connection with the sale of Brigadier (see Note 6. Sale of Brigadier), intangible assets with a gross carrying value of $0.8 million and accumulated amortization of $0.7 million were removed from the Company’s consolidated balance sheet during the six months ended December 31, 2025.

Estimated remaining amortization expenses of intangible assets for the next five fiscal years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):

NOTE 8. NOTE PAYABLE

In September 2024, we entered into a note purchase agreement the (“Purchase Agreement”) with Streeterville Capital, LLC (“Holder”), pursuant to which we agreed to issue and sell to Holder a secured promissory note in an initial principal amount of $4,380,000 (“Initial Note”) payable on or before 24 months from the issuance date (“Maturity Date”) and, upon the satisfaction of certain conditions in the Purchase Agreement, up to one additional secured promissory note (“Subsequent Note,” Initial Note and Subsequent Note, “Notes”).

The Purchase Agreement contained certain covenants and agreements, including that we will not pledge or grant any lien or security interest in our or our subsidiaries’ assets without the Holder’s prior written consent and that we will file reports under the Securities Exchange Act timely, and that our shares will continue to be listed or quoted on the NYSE American or Nasdaq. Also, without the Holder’s prior written consent, we may not: issue, incur or guarantee any debt obligations other than trade payables in the ordinary course; issue any security that has conversion rights in which the number of shares varies with the market price of our shares; issue any securities convertible into our shares with a conversion price that varies with the market price of our shares; issue any securities that have a conversion or exercise price subject to a reset due to a change in the market price of our shares or upon the occurrence of certain events related to our business (but excluding certain standard antidilution protection for any reorganization, recapitalization, noncash dividend, stock split or similar transaction); issue any securities pursuant to an equity line of credit, standby equity purchase agreement or similar arrangement. The Purchase Agreement also contained a most favored nations provision that provided we would grant to the Holder the same terms as we offer any subsequent investor in our debt securities and certain arbitration provisions in the event of a claim arising under the Purchase Agreement and other transaction documents.

The Company’s obligations under the Note were secured by: (i) a pledge of all the common stock the Company owned in USCF Investments, Inc. and (ii) a security interest in all of the assets of the Company. Further, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer’s trust, the Nicholas and Melinda Gerber Living Trust (“Gerber Trust”), provided: (i) a guaranty of the Company’s obligations to the Holder under the Note and (ii) a pledge of all of the common stock of the Company owned by the Gerber Trust.

As of June 30, 2025, the note payable balance outstanding, net of the original issue discount and fees paid, was $1.3 million. During the six months ended December 31, 2025 the Company paid all principal and interest due under the Note in the aggregate of $1.4 million. As of December 31, 2025, all collateral and guarantees pledged to the lender in connection with the Note have been released. The Company has no other indebtedness. The effective interest rate for the Note was 41.3%.

NOTE 9. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Public Stock Offering

On January 28, 2025, the Company closed on the sale of an aggregate of 2,050,000 shares of its common stock, $0.001 par value per share (“Common Stock”), at a price to the public of $1.10 per share (before deduction of underwriting discounts and commissions), in a firm commitment underwritten public offering pursuant to an underwriting agreement, dated January 26, 2025 (“Underwriting Agreement”), between the Company and the Maxim Group LLC (“Maxim”) as sole underwriter and book-running manager for the offering (“Offering”). Pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, the Company granted the underwriter a 45-day option to purchase up to an additional 307,500 shares of its Common Stock at the public offering price before deduction of underwriting discounts and commissions (“Overallotment Option”). Maxim did not exercise its Overallotment Option.

The net proceeds of the offering to the Company, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses, was $1.8 million. The Company used a portion of the net proceeds from the Offering to reduce debt, make additional investments in its financial services operations, and for other general working capital and corporate purposes.

The Company agreed that, until January 25, 2026, Maxim would have a right of first refusal to act as sole managing underwriter and sole book runner, sole placement agent, or sole sales agent, for any and all future registered offerings or private placements of the Company’s equity, equity-linked or debt securities for which we retain the service of an underwriter, agent, advisor, finder or other person or entity in connection with such offering during such period. Also, the Company agreed not to offer to retain any entity or person in connection with such an offering on terms more favorable than the terms on which the Company offered to retain Maxim.

Pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement, the Company agreed to indemnify Maxim against liabilities relating to the Offering arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended*(“Securities Act”)*, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Securities Exchange Act”), as well as liabilities arising from the material breach of any of the representations and warranties the Company made in the Underwriting Agreement, and to contribute to payments that Maxim may be required to make for these liabilities.

Equity Distribution Agreement

On March 7, 2025, we entered into an Equity Distribution Agreement (“EDA”) with Maxim pursuant to which we may sell from time-to-time shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $4.65 million through or to Maxim, as sales agent or principal. We have agreed to pay Maxim a commission equal to three percent (3%) of the aggregate gross proceeds from the sale of any shares through Maxim under the EDA, reimburse Maxim for certain legal fees and disbursements, and have agreed to indemnify Maxim against certain liabilities under the Securities Act. The EDA required that, until May 28, 2025, the date of the expiration of the standstill period in our Underwriting Agreement with Maxim for the Offering described above, sales of our shares of common stock be made at a minimum price per share of $1.50 unless, at any time, Maxim and the Company mutually agree upon a lower minimum price per share. As of December 31, 2025, we have not sold any shares pursuant to the EDA. The offer and sale, if any, of our shares of common stock under the EDA will be made pursuant to our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 which was filed with the SEC on December 18, 2024, and became effective on December 27, 2024, the base prospectus included therein, and a prospectus supplement that was filed by the Company with the SEC on March 7, 2025.

The foregoing does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy these securities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or other jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to the registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or other jurisdiction.

Stock-based Compensation

During the six months ended December 31, 2025, the following activity occurred under the Company’s 2021 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan.

As of December 31, 2025, there was $0.2 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to outstanding stock options that will be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 1.0 year. The weighted average remaining contractual life of the outstanding stock options as of December 31, 2025 was 7.8 years. As of December 31, 2025, there was $0.1 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to outstanding restricted stock awards (RSAs) that will be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 0.5 years. The total stock-based compensation expense recognized was $0.1 million and $0.2 million during the three months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and $0.1 million and $0.6 million during the six months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

NOTE 10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease Commitments

The Company’s combined lease costs were $0.2 million for each of the three months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, and $0.3 million and $0.5 million for each of the six months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The lease costs were recorded under general and administrative expense in the statements of operations. During the six months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company renewed leases which increased the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities by $0.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively.

Future minimum lease payments are (in thousands):

The weighted average remaining lease term for the Company’s operating leases was 1.8 years as of December 31, 2025 and a weighted-average discount rate of 5.8% was used to determine the total operating lease liabilities. The remaining lease term for the Company’s finance lease was 5.9 years as of December 31, 2025 with an annual interest rate of 7.0%.

Other Agreements and Commitments

As Marygold US built out its Fintech app, it entered into agreements with various service providers, some of which required long-term contracts. As of December 31, 2025, Marygold US has recorded payment commitments totaling $0.7 million with some former primary service vendors not including an additional $0.2 million in unused service commitments. It is uncertain what amount of this contractual commitment may be reduced by the vendors as services are no longer required.

Litigation

From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries may be involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of their respective businesses. Except as described below, there are no material pending legal proceedings against the Company or its subsidiaries. USCF LLC is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. USCF LLC, as the general partner of the United States Oil Fund, LP (“USO”) and the general partner and sponsor of the related public funds may, from time to time, be involved in litigation arising out of its operations in the ordinary course of business. Except as described herein, USO and USCF LLC are not currently party to any material legal proceedings.

In re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation

On June 19, 2020, USCF LLC, USO, John P. Love, and Stuart P. Crumbaugh, were named as defendants in a putative class action filed by purported shareholder Robert Lucas (the “Lucas Class Action”). The Court thereafter consolidated the Lucas Class Action with two related putative class actions filed on July 31, 2020 and August 13, 2020, and appointed a lead plaintiff. The consolidated class action is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York under the captionIn re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-04740.

On November 30, 2020, the lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint (the “Amended Lucas Class Complaint”). The Amended Lucas Class Complaint asserts claims under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Securities Exchange Act”), and Rule 10b-5 under the Securities Exchange Act. The Amended Lucas Class Complaint challenges statements in registration statements that became effective on February 25, 2020 and March 23, 2020 as well as subsequent public statements through April 2020 concerning certain extraordinary market conditions and the attendant risks that caused the demand for oil to fall precipitously, including the COVID-19 global pandemic and the Saudi Arabia-Russia oil price war. The Amended Lucas Class Complaint purports to have been brought by an investor in USO on behalf of a class of similarly-situated shareholders who purchased USO securities between February 25, 2020 and April 28, 2020 and pursuant to the challenged registration statements. The Amended Lucas Class Complaint seeks to certify a class and to award the class compensatory damages at an amount to be determined at trial as well as costs and attorney’s fees. The Amended Lucas Class Complaint named as defendants USCF LLC, USO, John P. Love, Stuart P. Crumbaugh, Nicholas D. Gerber, Andrew F Ngim, Robert L. Nguyen, Peter M. Robinson, Gordon L. Ellis, and Malcolm R. Fobes III, as well as the marketing agent, ALPS Distributors, Inc., and the Authorized Participants: ABN Amro, BNP Paribas Securities Corporation, Citadel Securities LLC, Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Credit Suisse Securities USA LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Goldman Sachs & Company, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corporation, Morgan Stanley & Company Inc., Nomura Securities International Inc., RBC Capital Markets LLC, SG Americas Securities LLC, UBS Securities LLC, and Virtu Financial BD LLC.

The lead plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of its claims against BNP Paribas Securities Corporation, Citadel Securities LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse Securities USA LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Morgan Stanley & Company, Inc., Nomura Securities International, Inc., RBC Capital Markets, LLC, SG Americas Securities LLC, and UBS Securities LLC.

On September 29, 2025, the Court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint without prejudice and granted plaintiff leave to file a motion to amend its complaint. On November 26, 2025, the plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a proposed second consolidated amended complaint, which defendants have opposed. The motion remains pending before the Court.

USCF LLC, USO, and the individual defendants inIn re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation intend to vigorously contest such claims and have moved for their dismissal.

Mehan Action

On August 10, 2020, purported shareholder Darshan Mehan filed a derivative action on behalf of nominal defendant USO, against defendants USCF, John P. Love, Stuart P. Crumbaugh, Nicholas D. Gerber, Andrew F Ngim, Robert L. Nguyen, Peter M. Robinson, Gordon L. Ellis, and Malcolm R. Fobes, III (the “Mehan Action”). The action is pending in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Alameda as Case No. RG20070732.

The Mehan Action alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties to USO and failed to act in good faith in connection with a March 19, 2020 registration statement and offering and disclosures regarding certain extraordinary market conditions that caused demand for oil to fall precipitously, including the COVID-19 global pandemic and the Saudi Arabia-Russia oil price war. The complaint seeks, on behalf of USO, compensatory damages, restitution, equitable relief, attorney’s fees, and costs. All proceedings in the Mehan Action are stayed pending disposition of the motion(s) to dismiss inIn re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation.

USCF LLC, USO, and the other defendants intend to vigorously contest such claims.

In re United States Oil Fund, LP Derivative Litigation

On August 27, 2020, purported shareholders Michael Cantrell and AML Pharm. Inc. DBA Golden International filed two separate derivative actions on behalf of nominal defendant USO, against defendants USCF, John P. Love, Stuart P. Crumbaugh, Andrew F Ngim, Nicholas D. Gerber, Robert L. Nguyen, Gordon L. Ellis, Malcolm R. Fobes, III, and Peter M. Robinson in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York at Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-06974 (the “Cantrell Action”) and Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-06981 (the “AML Action”), respectively.

The complaints in the Cantrell and AML Actions are nearly identical. They each allege violations of Sections 10(b), 20(a) and 21D of the Securities Exchange Act, Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and common law claims of breach of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, and waste of corporate assets. These allegations stem from USO’s disclosures and defendants’ alleged actions in light of the extraordinary market conditions in 2020 that caused demand for oil to fall precipitously, including the COVID-19 global pandemic and the Saudi Arabia-Russia oil price war. The complaints seek, on behalf of USO, compensatory damages, restitution, equitable relief, attorney’s fees, and costs. The plaintiffs in the Cantrell and AML Actions have marked their actions as related to the Lucas Class Action.

The Court consolidated the Cantrell and AML Actions under the captionIn re United States Oil Fund, LP Derivative Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:20-cv-06974 and appointed co-lead counsel. All proceedings inIn re United States Oil Fund, LP Derivative Litigationare stayed pending disposition of the motion(s) to dismiss inIn re: United States Oil Fund, LP Securities Litigation.

USCF LLC, USO, and the other defendants intend to vigorously contest the claims inIn re United States Oil Fund, LP Derivative Litigation.

No accrual or reserve has been made with respect to the above legal matters for the six months ended December 31, 2025, or the year ended June 30, 2025. We are currently unable to predict the timing or outcome of, or reasonably estimate the possible losses or range of possible losses resulting from these matters. Although we are vigorously contesting the litigation claims discussed above, in the near term it is reasonably possible that we may be required to establish a reserve or an accrual in the future depending upon the outcome of any of the foregoing litigation matters. An adverse outcome in any of these matters could materially adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Retirement Plan

The Company has a 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (“401K Plan”) covering U.S. employees. Participants may make contributions pursuant to a salary reduction agreement. In addition, the 401K Plan makes a safe harbor matching contribution. The Company’s matching contributions were less than $0.1 million for each of the three months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 and less than $0.2 million for each of the six months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.

NOTE 11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

USCF Investments – Related Party Transactions

The funds managed by USCF LLC and USCF Advisers are considered related parties for financial accounting purposes. The Company’s fund management revenue, totaling $4.6 million and $4.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, were earned from these related parties. Accounts receivable, totaling $1.6 million and $1.3 million as of December 31, 2025 and June 30, 2025, respectively, were owed from these related parties. USCF Investments, from time to time, provides initial seed capital investments in connection with the organization of ETP and ETF funds that USCF LLC manages. As of December 31, 2025 and June 30, 2025, the Company held a total of $1.9 million and $3.6 million, respectively, in funds managed by USCF Advisers which are included in investments on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company owns 20% and 21% of the outstanding shares of or other interest in these funds as of December 31, 2025 and June 30, 2025, respectively. Included in interest and dividend income on the consolidated statements of operations are $0.1 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and $0.2 million and $1.1 million for the six months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, of dividends earned from these related party investments.

USCF Advisers is no longer contractually obligated to pay license fees to an affiliated entity related to intellectual property rights for two of the funds during fiscal 2025 and 2026 as both parties agreed to terminate the license fee. The amount of license fee accrued as an expense during the three and six months ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 waszero and $0.2 million, respectively.

Note Payable

Refer to Note 8. Note Payable for a description of a related party transaction involving the Nicholas and Melinda Gerber Living Trust (“Gerber Trust”), of which our CEO is a trustee, pursuant to which, in connection with the Company’s recent debt financing transaction, the Gerber Trust provided to the holder of the note issued in the financing transaction a guaranty of the Company’s performance under the note and, as security, a pledge of all of the shares of the Company’s common stock owned by the Gerber Trust. As of December 31, 2025, all collateral and guarantees pledged to the holder of the note have been released. The note has been repaid in full.

Sale of Brigadier

On June 19, 2025, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with SKCAL LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell to SKCAL LLC all of the shares of stock it owns in its wholly owned subsidiary, Brigadier Security Systems (2000) Ltd., a Canadian registered corporation for $2.2 million. Scott Schoenberger, a director and 10.9% shareholder of the Company, is the sole member of SKCAL LLC making this transaction between related parties (seeNote 6. Sale of Brigadier for more details).

NOTE 12. INCOME TAXES

The Company is required to make its best estimate of the annual effective tax rate for the full fiscal year and use that rate to provide for income taxes on a current year-to-date basis. The effective tax rate could fluctuate in the future due to changes in the taxable income mix between various jurisdictions.

NOTE 13. SEGMENT REPORTING

In its operation of the business, our chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), who is our Chief Executive Officer, reviews revenues and operating income (loss) in assessing segment performance and deciding how to allocate cash and other resources. Asset and expense information by segment is not reported as the CODM does not evaluate segments on the basis of assets and expenses at each segment.