U.S. GOLD CORP.

U.S. GOLD CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTE 1 -ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Organization

U.S. Gold Corp., formerly known as Dataram Corporation (the “Company”), was originally incorporated in the State of New Jersey in 1967 and was subsequently re-incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada in 2016. Effective June 26, 2017, the Company changed its name to U.S. Gold Corp. from Dataram Corporation. On May 23, 2017, the Company merged with Gold King Corp. (“Gold King”), in a transaction treated as a reverse acquisition and recapitalization, and the business of Gold King became the business of the Company. The Company is a gold and precious metals exploration company pursuing exploration and development properties. The Company owns certain mining leases and other mineral rights comprising the CK Gold Project in Wyoming, the Keystone Project in Nevada and the Challis Gold Project in Idaho. The Company has established an estimate of proven and probable mineral reserves under subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“S-K 1300”) at its CK Gold Project, where the Company is conducting exploration and pre-development activities, and all of its activities on its other properties are exploratory in nature.

The Company’s CK Gold property contains proven and probable mineral reserves and accordingly is classified as a development stage property, as defined in S-K 1300. None of the Company’s other properties contain proven and probable mineral reserves and all activities are exploratory in nature.

Unless the context otherwise requires, all references herein to the “Company” refer to U.S. Gold Corp. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

NOTE 2 -SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation and principles of consolidation

The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), the instructions to Form 10-Q, and the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for interim financial information, which includes the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and presents the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries as of October 31, 2025. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The accounting policies and procedures used in the preparation of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been derived from the audited financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2025, which are contained in the Form 10-K filed on July 29, 2025, as amended October 10, 2025. The unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of April 30, 2025 was derived from those financial statements. It is management’s opinion that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made, which are necessary for a fair financial statement presentation. Operating results during the six months ended October 31, 2025, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2026 (“fiscal year 2026”).

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated balance sheet, and revenues and expenses for the period then ended. Actual results may differ significantly from those estimates. Significant estimates made by management include, but are not limited to, valuation of mineral rights, stock-based compensation, the fair value of common stock, valuation of warrant liability, asset retirement obligations and the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company has adopted ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”), for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. ASC 820 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied in accordance with U.S. GAAP, which requires the use of fair value measurements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements.

ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, ASC 820 requires the use of valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

These inputs are prioritized below:

The Company analyzes all financial instruments with features of both liabilities and equity under the Financial Accounting Standard Board’s (“FASB”) accounting standard for such instruments. Under this standard, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The Company’s warrant liability for warrants issued in connection with equity financings in March 2022 and April 2023 (see Note 9) was estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model using Level 3 inputs.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents are comprised of certain highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. The Company didnot have any cash equivalents on hand at October 31, 2025 and April 30, 2025. The Company places its cash with high credit quality financial institutions. The Company’s accounts at these institutions are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $250,000. To reduce its risk associated with the failure of such financial institutions, the Company evaluates, at least annually, the rating of the financial institutions in which it holds deposits. At October 31, 2025 and April 30, 2025, the Company had bank balances of approximately $8.6 million and $7.9 million, respectively, exceeding the FDIC insurance limit on interest bearing accounts.

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets of $998,231 and $726,631 at October 31, 2025 and April 30, 2025, respectively, consist primarily of costs paid for future services which will occur within a year. Prepaid expenses principally include prepayments in cash and equity instruments for consulting, public relations, business advisory services, insurance premiums, mining claim fees, easement fees, options fees, and mineral lease fees which are being amortized over the terms of their respective agreements.

Property

Property is carried at cost. The cost of repairs and maintenance is expensed as incurred; major replacements and improvements are capitalized. When assets are retired or disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gains or losses are included in income in the year of disposition. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets, generally three tofifteen years.

Impairment of long-lived assets

The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable, or at least annually. The Company recognizes an impairment loss when the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. The amount of impairment is measured as the difference between the asset’s estimated fair value and its book value. The Company didnot recognize any impairment during the six months ended October 31, 2025 and 2024.

Mineral Rights

Costs of leasing, exploring, carrying and retaining unproven mineral lease properties are expensed as incurred. The Company expenses all mineral exploration costs as incurred. Where the Company has identified proven and probable mineral reserves on any of its properties, development costs will be capitalized when all the following criteria have been met, a) the Company receives the requisite operating permits, b) completion of a favorable Feasibility Study and c) approval from the Board of director’s authorizing the development of the ore body. Until such time all these criteria have been met the Company records pre-development costs to expense as incurred.

When a property reaches the production stage, the related capitalized costs will be amortized on a units-of-production basis over the proven and probable reserves following the commencement of production. The Company assesses the carrying costs of the capitalized mineral properties for impairment under ASC 360-10, “Impairment of Long-Lived Assets”, and evaluates their carrying value under ASC 930-360, “Extractive Activities—Mining”, annually. An impairment is recognized when the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the mineral properties. Impairment losses, if any, are measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the mineral properties over its estimated fair value.

To date, the Company has expensed all exploration and pre-development costs as none of its properties have satisfied the criteria above for capitalization.

ASC 930-805, “Extractive Activities—Mining: Business Combinations” (“ASC 930-805”), states that mineral rights consist of the legal right to explore, extract, and retain at least a portion of the benefits from mineral deposits. Mining assets include mineral rights.

Acquired mineral rights are considered tangible assets under ASC 930-805. ASC 930-805 requires that mineral rights be recognized at fair value as of the acquisition date. As a result, the direct costs to acquire mineral rights are initially capitalized as tangible assets. Mineral rights include costs associated with acquiring patented and unpatented mining claims.

ASC 930-805 provides that in measuring the fair value of mineral assets, an acquirer should take into account both:

● The value beyond proven and probable reserves (“VBPP”) to the extent that a market participant would include VBPP in determining the fair value of the assets.

● The effects of anticipated fluctuations in the future market price of minerals in a manner that is consistent with the expectations of market participants.

Leases to explore for or use of natural resources are outside the scope of ASC 842, “Leases”.

Share-Based Compensation

Share-based compensation is accounted for based on the requirements of ASC 718, “Compensation—Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”), which requires recognition in the financial statements of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments over the period the employee or director is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively, the vesting period). ASC 718 also requires measurement of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award based on the grant-date fair value of the award.

Accounting for Warrants

Warrants are accounted for in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance provided in ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”) as either derivative liabilities or as equity instruments, depending on the specific terms of the agreements. The Company classifies as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (ii) give the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net-cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company) or (ii) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). Instruments that are classified as liabilities are recorded at fair value at each reporting period, with any change in fair value recognized as a component of change in fair value of derivative liabilities in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The Company assessed the classification of its outstanding common stock purchase warrants as of the date of issuance and determined that such instruments, except for the warrants discussed under Warrant Liability below, met the criteria for equity classification under the guidance in ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share”; ASC 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity”; ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging”. The Company has no outstanding warrants that contain a “down round” feature under ASC 815-10.

Warrant Liability

The Company accounts for the 625,000 warrants and 870,000 warrants issued in March 2022 and April 2023, respectively, in accordance with the guidance contained in ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” whereby under that provision these warrants do not meet the criteria for equity treatment and must be recorded as a liability. Accordingly, the Company classifies these warrant instruments as liabilities at fair value and adjusts the instruments to fair value at each reporting period. This liability is re-measured at each balance sheet date until the warrants are exercised or expire, and any change in fair value will be recognized in the Company’s statement of operations. The fair value of these warrants is estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model. Such warrant classification is also subject to re-evaluation at each reporting period (see Note 9).

Offering Costs

Offering costs incurred consisted of legal, placement agent fees and other costs that were directly related to registered direct offerings. Offering costs were allocated to the separable financial instruments issued in the registered direct offering based on the same proportion as the proceeds were allocated to the warrants and equity. Offering costs associated with warrant liabilities are expensed as incurred, presented as offering costs related to warrant liability in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations. Offering costs associated with the sale of common shares are charged against equity.

Remediation and Asset Retirement Obligation

Asset retirement obligations (“ARO”), consisting primarily of estimated reclamation costs at the Company’s CK Gold and Keystone properties, are recognized in the period incurred and when a reasonable estimate can be made, and recorded as liabilities at fair value. Such obligations, which are initially estimated based on discounted cash flow estimates, are accreted to full value over time through charges to accretion expense. Corresponding asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset and depreciated over the asset’s remaining useful life. AROs are periodically adjusted to reflect changes in the estimated present value resulting from revisions to the estimated timing or amount of reclamation and closure costs. The Company reviews and evaluates its AROs annually or more frequently at interim periods if deemed necessary.

Foreign Currency Transactions

The reporting and functional currency of the Company is the U.S. dollar. Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates prevailing on the transaction dates. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date with any transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency included in the results of operations as incurred. Translation adjustments, and transaction gains or losses, have not had, and are not expected to have, a material effect on the results of operations of the Company and are included in general and administrative expenses.

Leases

The Company accounts for leases in accordance with ASC Topic 842, Leases. Operating lease right of use assets represent the right to use the leased asset for the lease term and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at commencement date. As most leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses an incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the adoption date in determining the present value of future payments. Upon the election by the Company to extend the lease for additional years, that election will be treated as a lease modification and the lease will be reviewed for re-measurement. Lease expense for minimum lease payments is amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and is included in general and administrative expenses in the statements of operations.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to the provision of ASC 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), which requires, among other things, an asset and liability approach to calculating deferred income taxes. The asset and liability approach requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is provided to offset any net deferred tax assets for which management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred asset will not be realized.

The Company follows the provision of ASC 740-10, “Accounting for Uncertain Income Tax Positions” (“ASC 740-10”). When tax returns are filed, there may be uncertainty about the merits of positions taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. In accordance with the guidance of ASC 740-10, the benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions.

Tax positions that meet the more likely than not recognition threshold are measured at the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefit associated with tax positions taken that exceed the amount measured as described above should be reflected as a liability for uncertain tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheet along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination. The Company believes its tax positions are all more likely than not to be upheld upon examination. As such, the Company has not recorded a liability for uncertain tax benefits or for any related interest and penalties. In the event that the Company is assessed penalties and/or interest, penalties will be charged to other operating expense and interest will be charged to interest expense.

The Company follows ASC 740-10-25, “Definition of Settlement”, which provides guidance on how an entity should determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits and provides that a tax position can be effectively settled upon the completion and examination by a taxing authority without being legally extinguished. For tax positions considered effectively settled, an entity would recognize the full amount of tax benefit, even if the tax position is not considered more likely than not to be sustained based solely on the basis of its technical merits and the statute of limitations remains open. The federal and state income tax returns of the Company are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities, generally for three years after they are filed.

On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”) was enacted in the U.S. The OBBBA includes significant provisions, such as expensing of U.S. research expenditures and eligible capital expenditures, the permanent extension of certain expiring provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, modifications to the international tax framework and the restoration of favorable tax treatment for certain business provisions. There were no impacts reflected in our results for the quarter ending October 31, 2025, and our income tax expense or effective income tax rate.

Segment Information

The Company is engaged in the exploration and evaluation of its mineral properties. In accordance with ASC 280 – Segment Reporting, the Company has determined that it operates in one operating and reportable segment. Operating segments are defined as components of an entity where discrete financial information is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker (CODM). This determination is based on the manner in which the CODM, identified as the Chief Executive Officer, makes operating decisions, allocates resources and assesses financial performance.

All activities are related to the exploration and evaluation of mineral properties, and the Company has not commenced commercial operations or generated revenues to date. Internal reporting and decision-making are performed, and all financial results are reviewed on a consolidated basis by the CODM, without differentiation by individual exploration property. The single segment constitutes all the consolidated entity, and the accompanying consolidated financial statements and the notes to the accompanying consolidated financial statements are representative of such amounts. For the six months ended October 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company operated inone operating segment.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by FASB that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material effect on the financial statements upon adoption. The Company does not discuss recent pronouncements that are not anticipated to have an effect on or are unrelated to its financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.

In December 2023, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”). The standard enhances income tax disclosure requirements for all entities by requiring specified categories and greater disaggregation within the rate reconciliation table, disclosure of income taxes paid by jurisdiction, and providing clarification on uncertain tax positions and related financial statement impacts. ASU 2023-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. ASU 2023-09 allows entities to apply the amendment prospectively or elect retrospective application. The Company is currently assessing the impact of ASU 2023-09 on its annual disclosures.

On November 4, 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03 Subtopic 220-40 – Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024-03”) to improve the disclosures about a public business entity’s expenses and address requests from investors for more detailed information about the types of expenses (including purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, amortization, and depletion) in commonly presented expense captions (such as cost of sales, SG&A, and research and development). ASU 2024-03 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and early adoption is permitted. ASU 2024-03 allows entities to apply the amendment prospectively or elect retrospective application. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2024-03 may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

On December 8, 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11 – Interim Reporting (“ASU 2025-11”) which is intended to improve the navigability of the guidance in ASC 270, Interim Reporting, and clarify when it applies. Under the amendments, an entity is subject to ASC 270 if it provides interim financial statements and notes in accordance with GAAP. ASU 2025-11 also addresses the form and content of such financial statements, interim disclosures requirements, and establishes a principle under which an entity must disclose events since the end of the last annual reporting period that have a material impact on the entity. ASU 2025-11 is effective for interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2025-11 may have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3 —GOING CONCERN

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As of October 31, 2025, the Company had cash of approximately $8.8 million, working capital of approximately $8.2 million, which consists primarily of cash, and an accumulated deficit of approximately $99.97 million. The Company had a net loss and cash used in operating activities of approximately $6.6 million and $7.1 million, respectively, for the six months ended October 31, 2025. As a result of the utilization of cash in its operating activities, and the development of its assets, the Company has incurred losses since it commenced operations. The Company’s primary source of operating funds since inception has been equity financings. As of the filing date of this Form 10-Q, the Company may have sufficient cash to fund its corporate activities and general and administrative costs and currently undertaken project activities related to permitting and engineering studies. However, in order to advance any of its projects past the aforementioned objectives the Company does not have sufficient cash and will need to raise additional funds. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for the twelve months following the issuance of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset amounts or the classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 4 —MINERAL RIGHTS

As of the dates presented, mineral properties consisted of the following:

NOTE 5 —PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

As of the dates presented, property and equipment consisted of the following:

For the three months ended October 31, 2025 and 2024, depreciation expense amounted to $16,200 and $7,923, respectively, and for the six months ended October 31, 2025 and 2024, depreciation expense amounted to $24,636 and $16,054, respectively, and was included in general and administrative expenses as reflected in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

In September 2025, the Company acquired land and a building located in Cheyenne, Wyoming for a total purchase price of $1,119,324 (the “Property Acquisition”).

Concurrent with the Property Acquisition, the Company entered into a one-year lease agreement (the “leaseback”) to lease the property back to the seller (the “seller-lessee”). Accordingly, the Company is the lessor (the “buyer-lessor”) in the leaseback arrangement. The leaseback is accounted for as an operating lease under ASC 842.

In accordance with ASC 842-40 (Sale and Leaseback Transactions), the Company evaluated and determined that the contractual leaseback payments are below market rent for comparable properties and terms. ASC 842-40 requires the adjustment of the purchase price of the underlying asset for any off-market terms of sale and leaseback transactions. A buyer-lessor should account for such difference as prepayment of rent by the seller-lessee, which should be recognized as lease income along with the contractual leaseback payments.

Accordingly, the acquired land and building is recorded at an adjusted cost of $1,119,324 which consists of the purchase price of $1,095,336 and the off-market adjustment of $23,988 of deferred rent representing the value of the below-market leaseback terms.

The deferred rent is presented within accounts payable and accrued liabilities on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet and will be amortized to other income ratably over the one-year term of the lease agreement.

NOTE 6 —ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION

In conjunction with various permit approvals permitting the Company to undergo exploration activities at the CK Gold and Keystone projects, the Company has recorded an ARO based upon the reclamation plans submitted in connection with the various permits. The following table summarizes activity in the Company’s ARO for the periods presented:

For the three months ended October 31, 2025 and 2024, accretion expense amounted to $8,365 and $7,605 respectively, and for the six months ended October 31, 2025 and 2024, accretion expense amounted to $16,844 and $15,323 respectively, and was included in general and administrative expenses as reflected in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.

NOTE 7 –OPERATING LEASE RIGHT-OF-USE ASSETS AND OPERATING LEASE LIABILITIES

On May 1, 2021, the Company entered into a lease agreement for a facility in Cheyenne, Wyoming. The initial term of the lease was for a two-year period from May 2021 to May 2023 starting with a monthly base rent of $1,667. On January 30, 2023, the Company entered into a first lease amendment effective as of May 1, 2023, to extend this lease for a period of one year expiring April 30, 2024. On January 11, 2024, the Company entered into a second lease amendment effective as of May 1, 2024, to extend this lease for another period of one year expiring April 30, 2025, with an option to renew the lease for an additional one-year term. Under the second lease amendment, the monthly base rent was increased from $1,768 to $1,821 on May 1, 2024. On January 30, 2025, the Company entered into a third lease amendment effective as of May 1, 2025, to extend this lease for another period of one year expiring April 30, 2026, with an option to renew the lease for an additional one-year term. Under the third lease amendment, the monthly base will increase from $1,821 to $1,876 on May 1, 2025. The Company accounted for the lease amendments as lease modifications under ASC 842. On January 30, 2023, the effective date of the first lease amendment, the Company recorded an adjustment to the right-of-use asset and lease liability in the amount of $20,472 based on the net present value of lease payments discounted using an incremental borrowing rate of 8%. On January 11, 2024, the effective date of the second lease amendment, the Company recorded an adjustment to the right-of-use asset and lease liability in the amount of $20,936 based on the net present value of lease payments discounted using an incremental borrowing rate of 8%. On January 30, 2025, the effective date of the third lease amendment, the Company recorded an adjustment to the right-of-use asset and lease liability in the amount of $21,564 based on the net present value of lease payments discounted using an incremental borrowing rate of 8%.

On September 1, 2021, the Company entered into a lease agreement for another facility in Cheyenne, Wyoming. The initial term of the lease was for a two-year period from September 2021 through August 2023. On October 18, 2023, the Company entered into a lease amendment effective as of September 1, 2023 and extended the lease for a period of two years expiring August 31, 2025. On September 1, 2023, the effective date of the amendment, the Company recorded an adjustment to the right-of-use asset and lease liability in the amount of $72,672 based on the net present value of lease payments discounted using an incremental borrowing rate of 8%. On June 18, 2025, the Company entered into a second lease amendment effective as of September 1, 2025, to extend the lease for a period of two years expiring August 31, 2027. The Company will not have an option to renew the lease past August 31, 2027, unless agreed to by the lessor and the Company. Pursuant to the lease amendment, the monthly base rent will increase from $3,265 to $3,600. On June 18, 2025, the effective date of the second amendment, the Company recorded an adjustment to the right-of-use asset and lease liability in the amount of $78,054 based on the net present value of lease payments discounted using an incremental borrowing rate of 9.95%.

During the three months ended October 31, 2025 and 2024, lease expense of $19,909 and $18,931, respectively, and during the six months ended October 31, 2025 and 2024, lease expense of $39,148 and $37,862, respectively, was included in general and administrative expenses as reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Right-of- use assets are summarized below:

Operating Lease liabilities are summarized below:

The weighted average remaining lease term for the operating leases is 1.66 years and the weighted average incremental borrowing rate is 9.69% at October 31, 2025.

The following table includes supplemental cash and non-cash information related to the Company’s leases:

The remaining minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases at October 31, 2025 are as follows:

NOTE 8 —RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On November 25, 2024, the Company and Luke Norman Consulting Ltd. (“Norman Consulting”), an entity controlled by Luke Norman, who was appointed as a director of the Company on May 18, 2022, to provide services related to investor and strategic introductions for potential mergers and acquisitions and other potential and strategic relationships, entered into a consulting agreement (the “November 2024 Agreement”) for an initial term of 12 months, which shall automatically renew for a successive 12-month period unless terminated by the Company. As compensation for services rendered by Norman Consulting to the Company in connection with the November 2024 Agreement, the Company shall pay Norman Consulting an annual consulting fee of $250,000, which shall be paid in equal monthly installments. Additionally, Norman Consulting shall be entitled to receive payments upon the occurrence of a “transformative transaction” (as defined in the November 2024 Agreement). The Company also agreed to compensate Norman Consulting for its past services to the Company from March 2024 to October 2024 by (i) issuing 19,779 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock to Norman Consulting and (ii) paying a lump-sum cash payment of $65,000 to Norman Consulting. The Company paid consulting fees to Norman Consulting of $62,500 and $0 in cash during the three months ended October 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and $125,000 and $0 in cash during the six months ended October 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The Company issued the 19,779 shares discussed above on June 26, 2025. Additionally, as of October 31, 2025, the Company recorded accounts payable and accrued expenses totaling $127,078 due to Norman Consulting that was included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

NOTE 9 —WARRANT LIABILITY

As of October 31, 2025 and April 30, 2025, the Company’s warrant liabilities were valued at $0 and $11,631,100, respectively. Under the guidance in ASC 815-40, certain warrants did not meet the criteria for equity treatment. These warrants included a clause whereby the warrant holder may be entitled to receive a net cash settlement upon the completion of a “fundamental transaction.” A fundamental transaction, as defined in the warrants, includes(a) any merger or consolidation by and between the Company and another Person, (b) the sale or other disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of its assets, (c) the completion of any tender offer or exchange offer pursuant to which the holders of greater than 50% of the Company’s outstanding common stock has agreed to tender or exchange their securities, and (d) the consummation of a stock purchase agreement or other business combination whereby another Person acquires more than 50% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company. In the event of a fundamental transaction, the holder of the warrant has the right to require that the Company purchase the warrant from the holder by paying the holder an amount of cash equal to a valuation based on the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model reflecting an expected volatility equal to the greater of 100% or the 100-day volatility as of the trading day immediately following the public announcement of the applicable fundamental transaction. This volatility input precludes the Company from applying equity accounting as the warrant holder could receive a net cash settlement value that is greater than a holder of the Company’s common stock. Accordingly, the Company concluded that liability accounting was required.

The Company utilized a Monte Carlo Simulation model to estimate the fair values of the April 2023 and March 2022 warrants, which incorporated significant inputs that were not observable in the market, and thus represents a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820. The unobservable inputs utilized for measuring the fair value of the contingent consideration reflect management’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in valuing the contingent consideration. The Company determined the fair value by using the below key inputs to the Monte Carlo Simulation Model.

As such, these warrants are recorded at fair value as of each reporting date with the change in fair value reported within other income in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations as “Change in fair value of warrant liability” until the warrants are exercised, expired or other facts and circumstances lead the warrant liability to be reclassified to stockholders’ equity. In May 2025, the Company issued an aggregate of 870,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of the 870,000 common stock purchase warrants and received proceeds of approximately $5,359,200. Additionally, in May 2025, the Company issued an aggregate of 260,071 shares of common stock upon the cashless exercise of the 625,000 common stock purchase warrants. Therefore, the fair value of the warrant liability on the date of exercise of $10,136,100 was reclassified into additional paid in capital in May 2025.

Measurement

The Company accounted for the 625,000 warrants issued on March 18, 2022 and the 870,000 warrants issued on April 10, 2023, in accordance with the guidance contained in ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” whereby under that provision these warrants did not meet the criteria for equity treatment and were recorded as a liability. In May 2025, the fair value of the warrant liability on the date of exercise was reclassified into additional paid in capital (see above).

The key inputs for the warrant liability were as follows as of May 2, 2025 (the valuation date before the date of exercise):

The key inputs for the warrant liability were as follows as of April 30, 2025:

The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of the Level 3 warrant liability for the six months ended October 31, 2025:

NOTE 10 —STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

As of October 31, 2025, authorized capital stock consisted of 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 50,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share, of which 1,300,000 shares are designated as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock,400,000 shares are designated as Series B Convertible Preferred Stock,45,002 shares are designated as Series C Convertible Preferred Stock,7,402 shares are designated as Series D Convertible Preferred Stock,2,500 shares are designated as Series E Convertible Preferred Stock,1,250 shares are designated as Series F Preferred Stock,127 shares are designated as Series G Preferred Stock,106,894 shares are designated as Series H Preferred Stock, and 921,666 shares are designated as Series I Preferred Stock. The Company’s Board has the authority, without further action by the stockholders, to issue shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to or imposed upon the preferred stock.

There wereno shares of Preferred Stock outstanding as of October 31, 2025 and April 30, 2025.

Common Stock Issued for Cash

During August and September 2025, the Company issued 38,541 shares of its common stock pursuant to the Controlled Equity Offering SM Sales Agreement, dated June 9, 2025, with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., for gross proceeds of approximately $523,276.

Common Stock Issued for Exercise and Cashless Exercise of Stock Warrants

In May 2025, the Company issued an aggregate of 910,384 shares of common stock upon the exercise of 910,384 common stock purchase warrants and received proceeds of approximately $5,682,272. Out of the 910,384 warrants exercised,870,000 warrants were accounted for under warrant liability accounting (see Note 9).

Additionally in May 2025, the Company issued an aggregate of 260,071 shares of common stock upon the cashless exercise of 625,000 common stock purchase warrants which were accounted for under warrant liability accounting (see Note 9).

In June 2025 and July 2025, the Company issued an aggregate of 128,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of 128,000 common stock purchase warrants and received proceeds of approximately $800,740.

Between August 2025 and October 2025, the Company issued an aggregate of 266,665 shares of common stock upon the exercise of 266,665 common stock purchase warrants and received proceeds of approximately $1,864,970.

Additionally between August 2025 and October 2025, the Company issued an aggregate of 52,240 shares of common stock upon the cashless exercise of 105,000 common stock purchase warrants.

Common Stock Issued for Exercise and Cashless Exercise of Stock Options

In May 2025, the Company issued 1,726 shares of common stock upon the exercise of 1,726 stock options and received proceeds of approximately $13,204. Additionally in May 2025, the Company issued 1,016 shares of common stock upon the cashless exercise of 3,453 stock options.

In September 2025, the Company issued 1,726 shares of common stock upon the exercise of 1,726 stock options and received proceeds of approximately $13,204.

Common Stock Issuances, Restricted Stock Awards, and RSUs/DSUs Granted for Services

On June 26, 2025, the Company issued an aggregate of 4,998 shares of common stock to a consultant in connection with a consulting agreement for services rendered from October 2024 to May 2025. The 4,998 shares of common stock had a fair value of approximately $40,000, or $8 per share, based on the quoted trading prices on the respective monthly valuation dates, which was fully vested and expensed over each monthly service period from October 2024 to May 2025. In connection with this issuance, the Company reduced accrued liabilities by $35,000 and recognized stock-based compensation of $55,000 during the six months ended October 31, 2025.

On June 26, 2025, the Company issued 7,272 shares of common stock to a consultant in connection with a consulting agreement for services to be rendered from March 2025 to March 2026. The 7,272 shares of common stock had a fair value of approximately $60,000, or $8.25 per share, based on the quoted trading price on the starting date of the consulting agreement. The Company reduced accrued liabilities by $7,500, recognized stock-based compensation of $30,000 during the six months ended October 31, 2025 and recorded prepaid stock-based expense of $22,500 at October 31, 2025 to be amortized over the term of the agreement.

On June 26, 2025, the Company issued 19,779 shares of common stock to a director of the Company for his past consulting services from March 2024 to October 2024 (see Note 8). Accordingly, the Company reduced accrued liabilities by $151,309 at October 31, 2025.

Total stock-based compensation expense for awards issued for services was $55,268 and $0 for the three months ended October 31, 2025, and 2024, respectively, and total stock-based compensation expense for awards issued for services was $110,535 and $9,375 for the six months ended October 31, 2025, and 2024, respectively. As of October 31, 2025, there were 44,866 unvested RSUs and 4,033 unvested DSUs outstanding, with a total unvested compensation expense of $334,958 remaining to be expensed, which will vest upon the occurrence of certain conditions. Additionally, there were 497,331 vested RSUs and 40,233 vested DSUs that had been awarded but had not yet been converted into common stock. In total,586,461 RSUs and DSUs, both vested and unvested, remained outstanding as of October 31, 2025.

A summary of the changes in RSUs and DSUs outstanding during the six months ended October 31, 2025 follows:

Equity Incentive Plan

In August 2017, the Board approved the Company’s 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”) including the reservation of 165,000 shares of common stock thereunder.

On August 6, 2019, the Board approved and adopted, subject to stockholder approval, the 2020 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2020 Plan”). The 2020 Plan initially reserved 330,710 shares for future issuance to officers, directors, employees and contractors as directed from time to time by the Compensation Committee of the Board. The 2020 Plan was approved by a vote of stockholders at the 2019 annual meeting. With the approval and effectivity of the 2020 Plan, no further grants will be made under the 2017 Plan. On August 31, 2020, the Board approved and adopted, subject to stockholder approval, an amendment (the “2020 Plan Amendment”) to the 2020 Plan. The 2020 Plan Amendment increased the number of shares of common stock available for issuance pursuant to awards under the 2020 Plan by an additional 836,385, to a total of 1,167,095 shares of the Company’s common stock. The 2020 Plan Amendment was approved by the Company’s stockholders on November 9, 2020. On December 16, 2022, the Company’s stockholders approved another amendment to the 2020 Plan increasing the number of shares of common stock available for issuance pursuant to awards under the 2020 Plan by an additional 1,252,476 shares, to a total of 2,419,571 shares of the Company’s common stock.

Stock options

The following is a summary of the Company’s stock option activity during the six months ended October 31, 2025:

At October 31, 2025 and April 30, 2025, the aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable were $3,808,769 and $1,886,016, respectively.

Stock-based compensation for stock options recorded in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations totaled $79,746 and $7,402 for the three months ended October 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and $159,492 and $14,804 for the six months ended October 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. A balance of $186,069 remains to be expensed over future vesting periods related to unvested stock options issued for services to be expensed over a weighted average period of 0.56 years.

Stock-based expense for stock options were recorded in the following amounts as reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations:

Stock Warrants

A summary of the Company’s outstanding warrants to purchase shares of common stock as of October 31, 2025, and the changes during the period are presented below:

As of October 31, 2025, the aggregate intrinsic value of warrants outstanding and exercisable was $17,293,729.

NOTE 11 —NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

Net loss per share of common stock is calculated in accordance with ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share”. Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholder, by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The following were excluded from the computation of diluted shares outstanding as they would have had an anti-dilutive impact on the Company’s net loss. In periods where the Company has a net loss, all dilutive securities are excluded.

NOTE 12 —COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Mining Leases

The CK Gold property position consists of two State of Wyoming Metallic and Non-metallic Rocks and Minerals Mining Leases: (1) State of Wyoming Mining Lease No. 0-40828, consisting of 640 acres, and (2) State of Wyoming Mining Lease No. 0-40858 consisting of 480 acres. These leases were assigned to the Company in July 2014 through the acquisition of the CK Gold Project. Leases to explore for or use natural resources are outside the scope of ASU 2016-02 “Leases”.

Lease 0-40828 was renewed in February 2023 for aten-year term and Lease 0-40858 was renewed for aten-year term in February 2024. Lease 0-40828 requires an annual payment of $3.00 per acre starting with the year beginning February 2023 and Lease 0-40858 requires an annual payment of $3.00 per acre starting with the year beginning February 2024. The Company paid yearly required minimum lease payments of $3,360 in each of February 2024 and January 2025.

In connection with the Wyoming Mining Leases, production royalties of 2.1% of net receipts are required to be paid to the State of Wyoming, although once the project is in operation, the Board of Land Commissioners has the authority to reduce the royalty payable to the State of Wyoming.

The future minimum lease payments at October 31, 2025 under these mining leases are as follows, with each payment to be made in the fourth quarter of the respective fiscal years:

The Company may renew each lease for a fourth term, which will require annual payments of $4.00 per acre.

NPRC option:

Pursuant to the Merger, the Company acquired from NPRC a mineral property called Challis Gold located in Idaho pursuant to an option agreement dated in February 2020, which was later amended in June 2020. The Company paid the minimum royalty payment of $25,000 in June 2024 for fiscal year 2025. The Company paid the minimum royalty payment of $25,000 in June 2025 for fiscal year 2026.

The annual advance minimum royalty payments as of October 31, 2025, under the option agreement are as follows, with each payment to be made on the first anniversary of the effective date of the option agreement and continuing until the tenth anniversary:

100% of the advance minimum royalty payments will be applied to the royalty credits.

Exploration Access and Option to Lease Agreement

On August 25, 2021 (“Effective Date”), the Company entered into an Exploration Access and Option to Lease Agreement (the “Agreement”) with a private-party landowner (the “Landowner”) whereby the Landowner granted the Company an option (the “Option”) to lease and right of way on a property located in Laramie County, Wyoming. The Company may exercise the Option for five years (“Option Term”) from the Effective Date. During the Option, the Landowner granted non-exclusive rights (the “Exploration Access Rights”) to the Company to use the surface of the property for an annual exploration and access right payment of $10,000, thirty days after the effective date and each year on the anniversary of the Effective Date during the Option Term until such time the Option is exercised or expires. The Company is also required to pay an annual Option payment of $35,780 for the lease and $6,560 for the right of way within thirty days after the Effective Date and each year on the anniversary of the Effective Date during the Option Term until such time the Option is exercised by the Company or expires. The Company paid a total of $42,340 for each of the periods ended on September 1, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and 2025, pursuant to this Agreement.

At any time during the Option Term, the Company may exercise the Option by providing a written notice to the Landowner and the Company shall pay a one-time right-of-way payment of $26,240 at closing and shall execute a lease agreement. The exclusive option to lease (the “Lease”) and right of way (the “Right of Way”) is for a term of ten years with the right to extend for an additional ten years and requires an annual lease payment of $50,000, compensation for loss of grazing of $40.00 per acre impacted land and annual Right of Way payments of $13,120.

In consideration for the option rights, lease rights and Right of Way rights under this Agreement, the Company agreed to grant the Landowner shares of the Company’s common stock worth $50,000, which shares will not vest, or be issued, until the Company executes the Lease. Currently, the Company has not executed the Lease.

At any time during the Option Term, the Company may terminate this Agreement by providing a written notice to the Landowner. Upon termination, the Landowner is entitled to retain any payments already made and the Company shall have no further obligation after the date of termination. The Agreement, including the Option and the Exploration Access Rights, may be extended for a period of five years upon written notice from the Company. In the absence of such notice, the Agreement shall automatically terminate at the end of the Option Term. Currently, the Company has not exercised the Option.

Legal Matters

From time to time the Company may be involved in claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. To the Company’s knowledge, there are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or of which any of the Company’s property is the subject.

NOTE 13 —SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Warrant Exercises

In November 2025, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of 5,000 common stock purchase warrants and received proceeds of approximately $22,400.