Roadzen Inc.

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

From time to time, we may be subject to litigation and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings and we are not aware of any pending or threatened legal proceeding against us that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, cash flows or financial condition.

On April 17, 2025, Roadzen filed a lawsuit in Palm Beach County, Florida against Meteora Capital Partners, LP and affiliated entities (“Meteora”), alleging willful breach of contract and conduct that has damaged Roadzen and its public market value. The lawsuit stems from a forward purchase agreement (the “FPA”) signed in August 2023, under which Meteora agreed to acquire 5 million shares in Roadzen at effectively a zero-cost basis and to remit proceeds from the sale of those shares to Roadzen under certain contractual mechanisms. Roadzen alleges that, despite negotiated safeguards, Meteora sold Roadzen shares without honoring its payment obligations or providing the required notices under the FPA. Roadzen is pursuing a contractual claim plus additional damages.

On April 18, 2025, Meteora filed a separate lawsuit against the Company in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, also arising out of the FPA and the subscription agreement, dated August 25, 2023, between the Company and Meteora (the “Subscription Agreement”). In its complaint, among other things, Meteora alleges breach of contract by the Company based on the Company’s registration obligations under the Subscription Agreement and seeks specific performance and damages, as well as declaratory judgment that (i) Meteora complied with its obligations under the FPA and Subscription Agreement, (ii) the Company breached certain of its registration obligations under the Subscription Agreement and (iii) Meteora’s obligations to the Company under the FPA are limited to $914,726.53.

On May 23, 2025, the Company removed the pending action to the District Court for the District of Delaware. Thereafter, on June 3, 2025, Meteora moved to remand the action back to the Court of Chancery and subsequently sought default judgment against the Company in the District Court. On September 24, 2025, the Company filed an answer in opposition to the motion for default judgment with the District Court.

On September 23, 2025, the Company filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“USDC NY”) alleging securities fraud and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) by Meteora.

On October 17, 2025, the Company filed a voluntary discontinuance of the Florida case against Meteora and thereafter filed an amended complaint in USDC NY to include the breach of contract and breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing originally asserted in the Florida complaint.

On November 6, 2025 the District Court for the District of Delaware denied Meteora’s request for default judgment.