GT Biopharma Inc
For the period ended Dec 31, 2023. Filed Mar 26, 2024.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2023 · Filed Mar 26, 2024
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Stockholders and Board of Directors of GT Biopharma, Inc.
Brisbane, California
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of GT Biopharma, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2023 and 2022 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter Description
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Valuation of Warrant Liability
Description of the Matter
As described in Note 5 to the financial statements, during the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company issued certain warrants to acquire its common stock and such warrants contained provisions and terms that resulted in the warrants requiring recognition as fair value liabilities. The warrant liabilities are required to be measured at fair value initially at issuance, and subsequently thereafter at each reporting date including December 31, 2023.
We identified auditing the valuation of the warrant liabilities as a critical audit matter due to the complexity of the accounting for the transaction and the significant judgements used by the Company in determining the fair value of the warrant liabilities. This required a high degree of auditor judgment and increased auditor effort in auditing the determination and valuation of the warrant liabilities.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:
| ● | We obtained and examined the warrant liability agreement, including assessing the reasonableness of its presentation as a liability in the financial statements. |
| ● | We evaluated the appropriateness of the model used to value the warrant liability and tested the reasonableness of the assumptions used by the Company in determining the fair value of the warrant liability. |
| ● | We developed an independent expectation of the warrant liability and compared our independent expectation to the Company calculated value. |
Liquidity Assessment
Description of the Matter
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As disclosed in Note 2 to the financial statements, for the year ended December 31, 2023 the Company had cash and short-term investments of $14.0 million, working capital of $7.4 million and stockholders’ equity $7.5 million as of December 31, 2023. Management evaluated the Company’s liquidity within one year after the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements to determine if there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management has concluded that, based on its current plans and projections, the Company will be able to satisfy its liquidity requirements for more than one year from when these financial statements were issued. In the preparation of the liquidity assessment, management applied judgment to estimate the projected cash flows of the Company.
We identified management’s evaluation of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and related disclosures as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments and assumptions used by management in preparing the Company’s forecasted cash flows and the risk of bias in management’s judgments and assumptions in estimating these cash flows. Auditing these judgments and assumptions required a high degree of auditor judgment and increased auditor effort required to address these matters.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:
| ● | We obtained management’s cash flow forecasts covering the going concern assessment period and evaluated the reasonableness of the cash flow forecast by comparing it to historical operating results. |
| ● | We evaluated Managements assumptions in the preparing these forecasts and examined the underlying evidence. |
| ● | We performed sensitivity analyses on the projected research and development and general and administrative expenses used in the Company’s cash flow projections to evaluate the impact on the conclusions reached by management. |
| ● | We evaluated the adequacy of management’s disclosure in the financial statements regarding the Company’s liquidity by comparing to other audit evidence obtained to determine whether such information is consistent with the Company’s liquidity disclosure |
Weinberg & Company, P.A.
Los Angeles, California
March 26, 2024
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.