CREATIVE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.

CREATIVE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Table of Contents

To the Board of Directors and

Stockholders of Creative Medical Technologies, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Creative Medical Technologies, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Valuation and Disclosure of Warrants, Related Inducements and Modifications

Description of the Matter:

As discussed in Note 4 of the financial statements, the Company has a significant number of Warrants outstanding and issued additional warrants during the current period to induce the exercise of prior year warrants. The Company uses the Black Scholes model to value the warrants and related modifications. This model, the valuation of the warrants, and the sufficiency of the related disclosures, can be complex, involves judgment, and requires a thorough understanding of award terms.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit:

We gained an understanding of management’s processes and methodology to develop the estimates. We reviewed the warrant agreements, evaluated management’s selection of the valuation method, tested the inputs used in the Black-Scholes model. We further note that we reviewed relevant accounting guidance, including ASC 815-40-35-17 which discusses modifications for equity instruments in exchange for equity raises. We recalculated the Company’s warrants issued during the year, the value of the modifications, and we evaluated the adequacy of the disclosures in the Company’s financial statements, in line with related authoritative guidance.

/s/ Haynie

HaynieSalt Lake City, UtahMarch 20, 2026PCAOB #457

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.