Northwest Bancshares, Inc.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013). Based on such assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2025, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based upon those criteria.

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report and has issued a report with respect to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors

Northwest Bancshares, Inc.:

Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

We have audited Northwest Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated statements of financial condition of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 25, 2026 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

February 25, 2026

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors

Northwest Bancshares, Inc.:

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Northwest Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2025 and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 25, 2026 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Allowance for credit losses for loans evaluated on a collective basis

As discussed in Notes 1 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s allowance for credit losses for loans held for investment was $150.2 million as of December 31, 2025, a portion of which included the measurement of expected credit losses on a collective (pool) basis for all loans that share similar risk characteristics. The expected credit loss methodologies incorporate probability of default (PD) and loss given default (LGD) to determine a PD and LGD loss assumption which is applied to loan level exposures on an undiscounted basis over the contractual term of the loans, adjusted for prepayments, certain of which use a prepayment model. The Company uses a twenty-four-month reasonable and supportable forecast period, which is based on a probability-weighted multiple macroeconomic forecast approach (macroeconomic forecasts) and reverts to historical average loss rates over a twelve-month period for the remaining life of the loans. The following methodologies were developed for each significant loan portfolio segment: (1) the allowance for credit losses within the residential mortgage and home equity loan portfolios are calculated using a PD, LGD, and prepayment model adjusted for asset specific characteristics at the loan-level using projected default rates, prepayment rates, and severity rates as well as macroeconomic forecasts determined at the pool level; (2) the allowance for credit losses within the vehicle loan portfolio is calculated using a PD, LGD, and prepayment model adjusted for asset specific characteristics at the loan-level using projected default rates and prepayment rates, as well as macroeconomic forecasts determined at the pool level; (3) the allowance for credit losses for commercial real estate small business and commercial small business loan portfolios are calculated using PD and LGD models at the borrower-level using either a regression model or a fractional logit model as well as macroeconomic forecasts and expected prepayment rates at the pool level; and (4) the allowance for credit losses for the commercial real estate and commercial loan portfolios are calculated using PD and LGD models at the pool-level using projected default and severity rates as well as macroeconomic forecasts and expected prepayment rates determined at the pool level. A portion of the collective ACL is comprised of adjustments to historical loss information for asset-specific risk characteristics to reflect the extent they do not exist in the historical loss information. These adjustments are based on qualitative factors not reflected in the quantitative models but are likely to impact the measurement of estimated credit losses.

We identified the assessment of the expected credit losses on a collective basis for all loans, except for consumer loans, (collective ACL), as a critical audit matter. A high degree of audit effort, including specialized skills and knowledge, and subjective and complex auditor judgment was involved in the assessment of the collective ACL due to significant measurement uncertainty. Specifically, the assessment encompassed the evaluation of the collective ACL methodologies, including the (1) PD, LGD, and prepayment models and their significant assumptions, including the selection and weighting of the macroeconomic forecasts, and the reasonable and supportable forecast period, (2) adjustment for asset specific risk characteristics for residential mortgage, home equity, and vehicle loans, and (3) the qualitative factor methodology. The assessment also included an evaluation of the conceptual soundness and performance of the models. In addition, auditor judgment was required to evaluate the sufficiency of audit evidence obtained.

The following are the primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter. We evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of certain internal controls related to the Company’s collective ACL estimate, including controls over the:

•development of the collective ACL methodologies

•continued use and conceptual soundness of the PD, LGD, and prepayment models

•performance monitoring of the models

•determination and measurement of the significant assumptions used in the models

•determination of the methodology used to develop the qualitative factors

•analysis of the collective ACL results, trends, and ratios.

We evaluated the Company’s process to develop the collective ACL estimate by testing certain sources of data, factors, and assumptions that the Company used, and considered the relevance and reliability of such data, factors, and assumptions. In addition, we involved credit risk professionals with specialized skills and knowledge, who assisted in:

•evaluating the Company’s collective ACL methodologies for compliance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles

•evaluating judgments made by the Company relative to the development and performance testing of the model assumptions, inclusive of the metrics used for asset-specific risk characteristics for the mortgage, home equity, and vehicle models, by comparing them to relevant Company-specific metrics and trends and the applicable industry and regulatory practices

•assessing the conceptual soundness and performance testing of the model assumptions by inspecting the model documentation to determine whether the models are suitable for their intended use

•evaluating the selection and weighting of the macroeconomic forecasts by comparing it to the Company’s business environment and relevant industry practices

•evaluating the length of the reasonable and supportable forecast period by comparing it to specific portfolio risk characteristics and trends

•evaluating the methodology used to develop the qualitative factors

We also assessed the sufficiency of the audit evidence obtained related to the collective ACL by evaluating the cumulative results of the audit procedures, qualitative aspects of the Company’s accounting practices, and potential bias in the accounting estimate.

/s/ KPMG LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1963.

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

February 25, 2026

(in thousands, excluding share data)

Seeaccompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

(in thousands, excluding share data)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands, excluding per share data)

(1)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a) Nature of Operations

Northwest Bancshares, Inc., a Maryland corporation headquartered in Columbus, Ohio, is thebank holding company for its wholly owned subsidiary, Northwest Bank. Northwest Bank, a Pennsylvania chartered savings bank, offers a complete line of business and personal banking products, as well as treasury management solutions and wealth management services through its 161 banking locations in Pennsylvania, New York, Ohio, and Indiana. We have determined that we haveone repo rtable business segment.

(b) Principles of Consolidation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries after elimination of all intercompany accounts and transactions.

(c) Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statements of financial condition and cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and amounts due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions, federal funds sold, and other short-term investments with original maturitiesof three months or less.

(d) Marketable Securities

We classify marketable securities at the time of purchase as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale, or trading. Securities for which management has the intent and ability to hold until maturity are classified as held-to-maturity and are carried at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on a level yield basis (amortized cost). If it is management’s intent at the time of purchase to hold securities for an indefinite period of time and/or to use such securities as part of its asset/liability management strategy, the securities are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of tax. Securities classified as available-for-sale include securities that may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, resultant prepayment risk, or other market factors. Securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term are classified as trading and are reported at fair value, with changes in fair value included in earnings. The cost of securities sold is determined on a specific identification basis. We heldno securities classified as trading at or during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. Fair values are determined as described in Note 17. Throughout the year we validate the prices received from third parties by comparing them to prices provided by a different independent pricing service. We have reviewed the detailed valuation methodologies provided to us by our pricing services.

On a quarterly basis, we measure expected credit losses on held-to-maturity debt securities on a collective basis by major security type and all of our held-to-maturity debt securities are residential mortgage-backed securities. Accrued interest receivable on held-to-maturity debt securities totaled $4 million and $3 million at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively, and is excluded from estimated credit losses. All of our residential mortgage-backed securities are issued by U.S. government entities and agencies.

For available-for-sale debt securities in an unrealized loss position, on at least a quarterly basis, we review our investments for impairment. An investment security is deemed impaired if the fair value of the investment is less than its amortized cost. We consider both our intent to sell and the likelihood that we will not have to sell the investment securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis during our evaluation. If we intend to sell the investment security or if it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the investment security, the entire impairment is recorded in earnings. For available-for-sale debt securities that do not meet this criteria, we evaluate whether the decline in fair value has resulted from credit losses or other factors. In making this assessment we consider the issuer of the securities and their creditworthiness, any changes to the rating of the security and any adverse conditions specifically related to the security, among other factors. Also, we may evaluate the business and financial outlook of the issuer, as well as broader economic performance indicators. If this assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security is compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss exists and an allowance for credit losses is recorded for the credit loss, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than amortized cost. Any impairment that has not been recorded through an allowance for credit losses is recognized in other comprehensive income.

Changes in the allowance for credit losses are recorded as provision for (or reversal of) credit loss expense. Losses are charged against the allowance when we believe the uncollectibility of an available-for-sale security is confirmed or when there is an intent or requirement to sell the security.

Accrued interest receivable on available-for-sale debt securities totaled $3 million and $2 million at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively, and is excluded from the estimate of credit losses.

A debt security is placed on nonaccrual status at the time any principal or interest payments become 90 days past due. The receivable for interest income that is accrued but not collected is reversed against interest income when the debt security is placed on nonaccrual status. No debt securities were on nonaccrual status as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024.

(e) Loans Receivable

Our portfolio segments are based on the class of financing receivable. Additionally, the class of financing receivables are based on several factors including the method for monitoring and assessing credit risk and the risk characteristics of the financing receivables. Based on evaluation of the nature of our financing receivables, along with the nature and extent of exposure to credit risk arising from these receivables, our portfolio segments were determined to be Personal Banking and Commercial Banking loans.

•Personal Banking loans consist of the following classes of financing receivables:

◦Residential mortgage loans - fixed and adjustable-rate mortgage loans

◦Home equity loans - first and second mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit

◦Vehicle loans - direct and indirect automobile and motorcycle loans and recreational and powersports loans

◦Consumer loans - unsecured lines of credit, credit card, and other consumer loans

•Commercial Banking loans consist of the following classes of financing receivables:

◦Commercial real estate - multi-family commercial real estate loans secured by multi-family residences, such as rental properties and loans secured by nonresidential properties such as hotels, commercial offices, medical buildings, manufacturing facilities and retail establishments, excluding owner-occupied loans, and including small business commercial real estate loans

◦Commercial real estates - owner occupied - commercial real estate loans secured by residential or non-residential properties

◦Commercial loans - other commercial loans, including small business commercial loans and equipment finance loans

Loans are reported at amortized cost. Amortized cost is the principal balance outstanding, net of any deferred purchase premiums and discounts, deferred origination fees or costs and net charge-offs. Accrued interest receivable totaled$48 million and $40 million at December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively, and was reported in accrued interest receivable on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Accrued interest receivable is excluded from the amortized cost basis of loans and from the estimate of allowance for credit losses. Interest income on loans is credited to income as earned. Interest earned on loans for which no payments were received during the month is accrued at month end.

Generally, accrued interest on loans more than 90 days delinquent is reversed and such loans are placed on nonaccrual status, except for credit cards which are not placed in nonaccrual status based on delinquency. All loans are placed on nonaccrual status when principal or interest is 90 days or more delinquent or when there is reasonable doubt that interest or principal will not be collected in accordance with the contractual terms. Interest receipts on all nonaccrual loans are recognized as interest income when it has been determined that all principal and interest will be collected or are applied to principal when collectability of contractual principal is in doubt. Nonaccrual loans generally are restored to an accrual basis when principal and interest become current and a period of performance has been established in accordance with the contractual terms, typicallysix months.

Occasionally, the Company modifies loans to borrowers in financial distress by providing principal forgiveness, term extensions, an other-than-insignificant payment delay, or interest rate reduction. When principal forgiveness is provided, the amount of forgiveness is charged off against the allowance for credit losses.

Loan delinquency is measured based on the number of days since the payment due date. Past due status is measured using the loan’s contractual maturity date.

Personal Banking loans are charged-off or charged down when they become 180 days delinquent, unless the borrower has filed for bankruptcy. Commercial Banking loans are charged-off or charged down when, in our opinion, they are no longer collectible or when it has been determined that the collateral value no longer supports the carrying value of the loan for loans that are collateral dependent.

Loan fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and the net deferred fee or cost is then recognized using the level-yield method over the contractual life of the loan as an adjustment to interest income.

We identify certain residential mortgage loans, small business administration guaranteed loans and commercial loans which will be sold prior to maturity, as loans held-for-sale. These loans are recorded at fair value less estimated cost to sell. At December 31, 2025, and 2024, there were $22 million and $76 million of loans classified as held-for-sale, respectively.

Acquired loans that are not considered purchased with credit deterioration (“PCD”) are initially measured at fair value with no carryover of the related allowance for credit losses. Determining the fair value of the loans involves estimating the amount and timing of principal and interest cash flows expected to be collected on the loans and discounting those cash flows at a market rate of interest.

Acquired loans may be classified as PCD loans upon acquisition if they have experienced more than insignificant credit deterioration since origination. An allowance for credit losses on day 1 is determined using the same methodology as other loans held for investment. The initial allowance for credit losses determined on a collective basis is allocated to individual loans. The allowance is recognized on day 1 by adding it to the fair value of the loan, which is the “Day 1 amortized cost”. There is no credit loss expense recognized on PCD loans because the initial allowance is established by grossing up the amortized cost of the PCD loan. The difference between the initial amortized cost basis and the par value of the loan is a noncredit discount or premium, which is amortized into interest income over the life of the loan. Subsequent changes to the allowance for credit losses are recorded through provision expense.

(f) Allowance for Credit Losses and Provision for Credit Losses

The allowance for credit losses is deducted from, or added to, the loan’s amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on our lending portfolios. We estimate the allowance balance using relevant available information, from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Loans are charged off against the allowance when we believe that a loan balance is confirmed to be uncollectible. Expected recoveries do not exceed the aggregate of amounts previously charged-off and expected to be charged-off.

Expected credit losses are estimated over the contractual term of the loans, adjusted for prepayments. The contractual term includes extension or renewal option included in the contract that are outside of our control and is not unconditionally cancellable by the Company.

Credit card receivables do not have stated maturities. In determining the estimated life of a credit card receivable, we first estimate the future cash flows expected to be received and then apply those expected future cash flows to the credit card balance.

The allowance for credit losses is measured on a collective (“pool”) basis when similar risk characteristics exist. For the purpose of calculating portfolio-level reserves, we have grouped our loans into seven segments: residential mortgage loans, home equity loans, vehicle loans, consumer loans, commercial real estate loans, commercial real estate owner-occupied and commercial loans. The allowance for credit losses is measured at the pool level utilizing loan-level inputs wherever possible. We use a twenty-four month forecasting period and revert to historical average loss rates thereafter. The reasonable and supportable forecast is based on a probability-weighted multiple macroeconomic forecast approach and obtained from a third-party vendor. Reversion to the mean takes place over a twelve-month period. Our loss rate models utilize a linear reversion method. For our probability of default (“PD”)/loss given default (“LGD”) models we revert the PD utilizing exponential reversion, which is an accelerated method, and the LGD utilizing a linear reversion method. Historical average loss rates are calculated using historical data beginning in 2009 through the current period. As part of the analysis as of December 31, 2025, we considered the most recent macroeconomic forecasts available.

Mortgage and Home Equity Loans

The allowance for credit losses within the mortgage and home equity loan pools is calculated using a non-discounted cash flow method through a PD, LGD, and prepayment model developed by an external third-party and adjusted for asset specific characteristics. These classes are further divided into smaller pools of loans with similar risk characteristics such as lines versus loans, fixed versus variable, senior lien position versus junior lien position, among other things.

For each pool, the models project default rates, prepayment rates, and severity rates. The models accept as inputs key risk drivers such as current balance, original credit bureau score, original loan-to-value ratio, type of collateral, location of collateral, delinquency status, loan age, among other characteristics. They also utilize macroeconomic forecasts of home price indices, unemployment rates, gross domestic product, and others.

Vehicle Loans

The allowance for credit losses within the vehicle loan pool is calculated using a non-discounted cash flow model through a PD, LGD, and prepayment model developed by an external third-party and adjusted for asset specific risk characteristics. These classes are further divided into smaller pools of loans with similar risk characteristics such as cars, trucks and powersport vehicles and recreational vehicles. Monthly probabilities of default and prepayments are estimated for each loan, along with estimates of exposure at default and loss given default. The model accepts as inputs key risk drivers such as loan, borrower, and collateral characteristics. It also uses macroeconomic forecasts of used car price indices, gross domestic product, unemployment rates and others.

Consumer Loans

The allowance for credit losses within the consumer loan portfolio is calculated at the portfolio-level using a non-discounted cash flow method through a suite of loss rate models developed internally with the assistance of an external third-party. This class of financing receivables is further divided into credit cards, unsecured lines of credit and other consumer loans.

The allowance for credit losses for credit cards and unsecured lines of credit is calculated using two transition matrix models to project portfolio-level net charge-off rates. Both models use current balance and delinquency status as key risk drivers. These models are not natively sensitive to macroeconomic forecasts. The necessary adjustments to account for current and expected macroeconomic conditions is captured via our qualitative adjustment framework.

For other consumer loans, a regression model is used to project portfolio-level net charge-off rates. This model uses borrower information and macroeconomic forecasts as key inputs.

Commercial Real Estate Loans

The commercial real estate loan class is further segmented into smaller pools of loans with similar risk characteristics, commercial real estate loans and small business commercial real estate loans.

The allowance for credit losses for the commercial real estate loan portfolio is calculated at the pool level using a non-discounted cash flow method through a PD/LGD model developed by an external third-party. This model projects default and severity rates. The model accepts as inputs key risk drivers such as current balance, original loan-to-value-ratio, type of collateral, location of collateral, delinquency status, loan age, obligor financial statement information, and expected prepayment rates, among other characteristics. It also utilizes macroeconomic forecasts of commercial real estate price indices, unemployment rates, gross domestic product and others.

The allowance for credit losses for commercial real estate small business portfolio is calculated at a borrower-level with a PD/LGD model. Separate models were built by industry segments. Each model was built with a logistic regression model except for the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) and Agriculture sub-portfolios. For SBA, a portfolio-level fractional logit model was developed; the small business Agriculture segment uses a simple long-run average loss rate. The LGD model is assumption-based and assigns varying LGDs by industry segment. The models’ overall key inputs are borrower and collateral characteristics and macroeconomic forecasts including real GDP, unemployment, home price appreciation, and real disposable personal income.

Commercial Loans and Commercial Real Estate - Owner Occupied Loans

The commercial loan class is further segmented into smaller pools of loans with similar risk characteristics, commercial loans and commercial small business loans, including equipment finance loans.

The allowance for credit losses for the commercial loan portfolio and the commercial real estate - owner occupied loan portfolio is calculated at the pool level using a non-discounted cash flow method through a PD/LGD model developed by an external third-party. The commercial loan portfolio and the commercial real estate owner occupied loan portfolio models project default and severity rates. The model accepts as inputs key risk drivers such as the obligor financial statement information, collateral type, the obligor’s primary industry, expected prepayment rates, among other characteristics. It also utilizes macroeconomic forecasts of unemployment rates, gross domestic product, corporate bond spreads, and others.

The allowance for credit losses for commercial small business loans is calculated at a borrower-level with a PD/LGD model. Separate models were built by industry segments. Each model was built with a logistic regression model except for the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) and Agriculture sub-portfolios. For SBA, a portfolio-level fractional logit model was developed; the small business Agriculture segment uses a simple long-run average loss rate. The LGD model is assumption-based and assigns varying LGDs by industry segment. The models’ overall key inputs are borrower and collateral characteristics and macroeconomic forecasts including real GDP, unemployment, home price appreciation, and real disposable personal income.

Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. Loans evaluated individually are not included in the collective evaluation. When we determine that foreclosure is probable or when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty at the reporting date and repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral, expected credit losses are based on the fair value of the collateral at the reporting date, adjusted for selling costs. If this criterion is not met, a discounted cash flow method is used to determine the allowance for credit losses. All changes in the discounted cash flow method over time are reported in the allowance for credit losses.

The allowance calculation is also supplemented with qualitative reserves that takes into consideration the current portfolio and specific risk characteristics, such as changes in underwriting standards, portfolio mix, delinquency level, or term, as well as changes in environmental conditions, among other factors, that have occurred but are not yet reflected in the quantitative model component.

The modifications to borrowers experiencing financial distress are included in their respective portfolio segment and the current loan balance and updated loan terms are run through their respective allowance models to arrive at the quantitative portion of the allowance for credit losses. Subsequent performance of the loans will be measured by delinquency status and will be captured through our models or our qualitative factor assessment, as deemed appropriate. If we no longer believe the loan demonstrates similar risks to their respective portfolio segment, an individual assessment will be performed. Upon the Company’s determination that a modified loan (or portion of a loan) has subsequently been deemed uncollectible, the loan (or a portion of the loan) is charged off. Therefore, the amortized cost basis of the loan is reduced by the uncollectible amount and the allowance for credit losses is adjusted by the same amount.

For off-balance-sheet credit exposures, we estimate expected credit losses over the contractual period in which we are exposed to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable. The liability for credit losses on off-balance-sheet credit exposures is adjusted through a provision for credit loss - unfunded commitments expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income. We estimate the liability balance using relevant available information, from internal and external sources, relating to past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The estimate includes a consideration of the likelihood that funding will occur and an estimate of expected credit losses on commitments expected to be funded over its estimated life. Off-balance-sheet exposures that are not unconditionally cancellable have been identified for the mortgage, home equity, commercial real estate, and commercial loan portfolios.

(g) Real Estate Owned

Real estate owned is comprised of property either acquired through foreclosure or voluntarily conveyed by borrowers. These assets are recorded on the date acquired at the lower of the loan balance or fair value of the collateral, less estimated disposition costs, with the fair value being determined by an appraisal. Any initial write-down is charged to the allowance for credit losses. Subsequently, foreclosed assets are valued at the lower of the amount recorded at acquisition date or the current fair value, less estimated disposition costs. Any subsequent write-down or gains or losses realized from the disposition of such property are credited or charged to noninterest income.

(h)Restricted Investment in FHLB Stock

Federal law requires a member institution of the FHLB system to hold stock of its district FHLB according to a predetermined formula. FHLB stock is carried at cost and evaluated for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value. FHLB stock can only be purchased, redeemed and transferred at par value. Dividends are reported in interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

(i) Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is accumulated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Estimated lives range from three to 39 years. Amortization of leasehold improvements is accumulated on a straight-line basis over the terms of the related leases or the useful lives of the related assets, whichever is shorter.

(j) Goodwill

Goodwill is generated from the premium paid for an acquisition and is allocated to reporting units, which are either our reportable segments or one level below. Reporting units are identified based upon analyzing each individual operating segment. A reporting unit is defined as a distinct, separately identifiable component of an operating segment for which complete, discrete financial information is available that management regularly reviews.

Goodwill is not subject to amortization but is tested for impairment at least annually and possibly more frequently if certain events occur or changes in circumstances arise. In testing goodwill for impairment, we have the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If, after assessing all events and circumstances, we determine it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, then performing the two-step impairment test would be unnecessary. However, if we conclude otherwise, it would then be required to perform the first step of the goodwill impairment test and continue to the second step, if necessary. Step 1 requires the fair value of each reporting unit be compared to its carrying amount, including goodwill. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit requires a high degree of subjective judgment, including developing cash flow projections, selecting appropriate discount rates, identifying relevant market comparables, incorporating general economic and market conditions and selecting an appropriate control premium. We have established June 30 of each year as the date for conducting our annual goodwill impairment assessment. Quarterly, we evaluate if there are any triggering events that would require an update to our previous assessment.

We conducted our annual impairment assessment as of June 30, 2025 by first performing a qualitative assessment of goodwill to determine if it was more likely than not that the fair value was less than the carrying value. In performing a qualitative analysis, factors considered include, but are not limited to, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions and overall financial performance. The results of the qualitative assessment for 2025 indicated that it was not more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit was less than the carrying value. Consequently, no additional quantitative impairment test was required andno impairment wasrecorded in 2025. Future events could cause us to conclude that goodwill has become impaired, which would result in recording an impairment loss. There were no events or changes in circumstance in our operations that would cause us to update the assessment performed as of June 30, 2025 and 2024. Accordingly, we have determined that goodwill is not impaired as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.

(k) Core Deposit and Other Identifiable Intangibles

Through the assistance of an independent third party, we analyze and prepare a core deposit study for all bank acquisitions or other identifiable intangible asset study, such as customer lists, for all non-bank acquisitions. The core deposit study reflects the cumulative present value benefit of acquiring deposits versus an alternative source of funding. The other identifiable intangible asset study reflects the cumulative present value benefit of acquiring the income stream from an existing customer base versus developing new business relationships. Based upon analysis, the amount of the premium related to the core deposits or other identifiable intangibles of the business purchased is calculated along with the estimated life of the intangible. The intangible, which is recorded in other intangible assets, is then amortized to expense on an accelerated basis over an approximate life of typically between seven toeleven years.

(l) Bank-Owned Life Insurance

We own insurance on the lives of a certain group of current and former employees and directors. The policies were purchased to help offset the increase in the costs of various benefit plans, including healthcare, as well as the directors deferred compensation plan. The cash surrender value of these policies is included as an asset on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and any increases in the cash surrender value are recorded as tax-free noninterest income on the Consolidated Statements of Income. In the event of the death of an insured individual covered by these policies, after distribution to the insured’s beneficiaries, if any, we receive a tax-free death benefit, which is recorded as noninterest income.

(m) Deposits

Interest on deposits is accrued and charged to expense monthly and is paid or credited in accordance with the terms of the accounts.

(n) Revenue Recognition

Revenue that is not associated with our financial assets and financial liabilities is recognized when performance obligations under the terms of a contract with our customers are satisfied. Revenue is measured as the amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for transferring goods or providing services. The majority of our revenue continues to be recognized at the point in time when the services are provided to our customers.

(o)Pension Plans

We maintain multiple noncontributory defined benefit pension plans (“Pension Plan”) for certain of our employees. The net periodic pension cost has been calculated using service cost, interest cost, expected returns on plan assets and net amortization. The other components of the net periodic benefit cost are included in other expense on the Consolidated Statement of Income and are reported separately from the service costs.

Pension expense and obligations depend on assumptions used in calculating such amounts. These assumptions include discount rates, anticipated salary increases, interest costs, expected return on plan assets, mortality rates, and other factors. In determining the projected benefit obligations for pension benefits at December 31, 2025 and 2024, we used a discount rateof 5.41% and 5.44%, respectively.

(p) Income Taxes

We join with our wholly owned subsidiaries in filing a consolidated federal income tax return. In accordance with an intercompany tax allocation agreement, the applicable federal income tax expense or benefit is allocated to each subsidiary based upon taxable income or loss calculated on a separate company basis. Each subsidiary is responsible for payment of its own federal income tax liability or receives reimbursement of federal income tax benefit. In addition, deferred taxes are calculated and maintained on a separate company basis.

We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. The objective of the asset and liability method is to establish deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of our assets and liabilities based on the tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities with regard to a change in tax rates is recognized in the tax provision in the period the change is enacted. If current available information raises doubt as to the realization of the deferred tax assets, a valuation allowance is established.

(q) Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation expense is recognized based on the grant-date fair value of stock-based awards that are expected to vest over the requisite service period. All awards, both those with cliff vesting and graded vesting, are expensed on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. As compensation expense is recognized, a deferred tax asset is recorded that represents an estimate of the future tax deduction from exercise or release of restrictions. At the time awards are exercised, cancelled, expire or restrictions are released, we recognize an adjustment to income tax expense for the difference between the previously estimated tax deduction and the actual tax deduction realized. We account for forfeitures as they occur. For additional information regarding grants of stock-based awards, see Note 16.

(r) Derivative Financial Instruments

We recognize all derivative financial instruments as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. To qualify for hedge accounting rules, a hedging relationship must be highly effective in offsetting the risk designation as being hedged. The hedging relationship must be formally documented at inception and assess the hedging relationship at least on a quarterly basis to ensure the hedging instrument continues to be highly effective over the life of the hedging relationship. Those methods must be consistent with our approach to managing risk.

At times, we utilize interest rate swap agreements as part of the management of interest rate risk to hedge the interest rate risk on floating rate borrowings. Amounts receivable or payable are recognized as accrued under the terms of the agreements and the differential is recorded as an adjustment to interest expense. The interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedges, with the derivative’s unrealized gain or loss recorded as a component of other comprehensive income which is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. A hedging relationship that is determined to not be highly effective no longer qualifies for hedge accounting and must be de-designated. Any gain or loss is recognized immediately in earnings.

We act as an interest rate or foreign exchange swap counterparty for certain commercial borrowers in the normal course of servicing our customers, which are accounted for at fair value. We manage our exposure to such interest rate or foreign exchange swaps by entering into corresponding and offsetting interest rate swaps with third parties that mirror the terms of the swaps we have with the commercial borrowers. These positions (referred to as “customer swaps”) directly offset each other and our exposure is the fair value of the derivatives due to changes in credit risk of our commercial borrowers and third parties. Customer swaps are recorded within other assets or other liabilities on the consolidated statement of financial condition at their estimated fair value. Changes to the fair value of assets and liabilities arising from these derivatives are included, net, in other operating income in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

We offset the fair value amounts recognized for derivative instruments and the fair value for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral arising from derivative instruments recognized at fair value executed with the same counterparty under a master netting arrangement.

(s) Off-Balance-Sheet Instruments

In the normal course of business, we extend credit in the form of loan commitments, undisbursed lines of credit, and standby letters of credit. These off-balance-sheet instruments involve, to various degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk not reported in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. We utilize the same underwriting standards for these instruments as other extensions of credit.

(t) Leases

At inception, the Company determines if an arrangement contains a lease and whether that lease meets the classification of a finance or operating lease. Operating lease right of use (“ROU”) assets represent our right to use an underlying asset during the lease term and operating lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized at lease commencement based on the present value of the remaining lease payments. ROU assets are further adjusted for lease incentives and initial direct costs.

The Company has operating leases for certain branch and office facilities or land with lease terms up to 35 years. These leases generally contain renewal options for periods ranging fromone toten years. These options are included in the lease term when it is reasonably certain that the options will be exercised.

Some of the Company’s lease arrangements contain lease components (e.g., minimum rent payments) and non-lease components (e.g., common area maintenance, taxes, etc.). For all leases, the Company elected the option of not separating lease and non-lease components and instead we account for them as a single lease component.

Certain lease agreements include rental payments that are adjusted periodically for an index or rate. The leases are initially measured using the projected adjustment for the index or rate in effect at the commencement date. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.

Generally, the Company cannot practically determine the interest rate implicit in the lease. Therefore, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate for the lease. The Company’s incremental borrowing rate for a lease is the rate of interest it would have to pay on a collateralized basis to borrow an amount equal to the lease payments under similar terms.

(u)Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The estimate and assumptions that we deem important to our financial statements relate to the allowance for credit losses. This estimate and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and judgment and we evaluate them using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment. We adjust our estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. As future events cannot be determined, actual results could differ significantly from our estimates.

(v) Reclassification of Prior Years’ Statements

Certain items previously reported have been reclassified to conform with the current year’s reporting format. These reclassifications had no effect on the reported results of operations.

(2)Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2023-09, "Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures." This ASU requires additional disaggregated disclosures on entity's effective tax rate reconciliation and additional details on income taxes paid. This guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024, with early adoption permitted. This ASU is applied prospectively with the option to apply the ASU retrospectively. This guidance was adopted on January 1, 2025 on a prospective basis and did not have a material impact to the Company’s financial statements.

(3)Acquisition

On July 25, 2025, the Company completed the previously announced merger with Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. (“Penns Woods”), the holding company for Jersey Shore State Bank and Luzerne Bank, along with the mergers of Jersey Shore State Bank and Luzerne Bank, (collectively referred to as "Penns Woods"), with and into Northwest Bank, for total consideration of $234 million. The transaction has expanded Northwest’s franchise by 21 offices across North Central and Northeastern Pennsylvania after the consolidation. The results of Penns Woods operations are included in the Consolidated Statements of Income from the date of acquisition.

The Penns Woods transaction constitutes a business combination as defined by FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. Accordingly, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are presented at their estimated fair values based on preliminary valuations as of the acquisition date.

Under the terms of the merger agreement, each share of Penns Woods common stock was converted into 2.385 shares of the Company's common stock, or a total of 18,266,469 shares of common stock of the Company, valued at $230 million, based on the $12.63 per share closing price of the Company's stock on July 25, 2025 with cash in lieu of fractional shares paid at a rate of $13.14 per whole share of Northwest Bancshares, Inc. common stock. Additionally, any unexercised stock options of Penns Woods outstanding were cancelled in exchange for a cash payment at the spread value over the exercise price with total consideration paid of $4 million.

Preliminary goodwill associated with the Penns Woods acquisition totaled $63.3 million at December 31, 2025, which reflects expected synergies and economies of scale from the acquisition. The goodwill at December 31, 2025 was calculated based on the preliminary fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date, inclusive of subsequent measurement period adjustments described below, and is subject to change if the Company obtains additional information and evidence within the one-year measurement period. Valuations subject to change include, but are not limited to: loans, identified intangible assets, certain deposits, certain other assets and liabilities, and related deferred income taxes. The Company recorded measurement period adjustments in the fourth quarter of 2025 related to the acquisition primarily related to other assets, other liabilities and the fair value of deposit intangible assets which resulted in a net $5.9 million increase in preliminary goodwill associated with the acquisition compared to September 30, 2025.

The following table shows the preliminary assessment of the consideration transferred and assets acquired and the liabilities assumed that were recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition, inclusive of the aforementioned measurement period adjustments (dollars in thousands).

We estimated the fair value of loans acquired from Penns Woods by utilizing a methodology wherein similar loans were aggregated into pools. Cash flows for each pool were determined by estimating future credit losses and the rate of prepayments. Projected monthly cash flows were then discounted to present value based on a market rate for similar loans. There was no carryover of Penns Woods allowance for credit losses associated with the loans we acquired as the loans were initially recorded at fair value. The following table presents additional information related to the acquired Penns Woods loan portfolio at the acquisition date, including the initial ACL recorded at acquisition on the PCD loans (amounts in thousands):

The core deposit intangible represents the future economic benefit of acquired customer deposits. The fair value of the core deposit intangible asset was estimated based on a discounted cash flow methodology that incorporated expected customer attrition rates, cost of deposit base, net maintenance cost associated with customer deposits, and the cost for alternative funding sources. The core deposit intangible asset recognized as part of the Penns Woods merger is being amortized over its estimated useful life often years utilizing an accelerated method.

The goodwill, which is not amortized for book purposes, was assigned to our only segment, Banking and is not deductible for tax purposes.

The fair values of savings and transaction deposit accounts acquired from Penns Woods were assumed to approximate the carrying value as these accounts have no stated maturity and are payable on demand. Certificates of deposit were valued by projecting out the expected cash flows based on the contractual terms of the certificates of deposit. These cash flows were discounted based on a market rate for a certificate of deposit with a corresponding maturity.

Direct costs related to the Penns Woods merger were expensed as incurred and were $40 million during the year ended December 31, 2025, which included technology and communications costs, professional services, marketing and advertising, severance expense and contract termination costs.

The following table presents unaudited pro forma information as if the acquisition of Penns Woods had occurred on January 1, 2023. These results combine the historical results of Penns Woods in the Company's Consolidated Statements of Income and while certain adjustments were made for the estimated impact of certain fair value adjustments and other acquisition-related activity, they are not indicative of what would have occurred had the acquisition taken place on January 1, 2024. No adjustments have been made to the pro forma results regarding possible revenue enhancements or expense efficiencies. Pro forma adjustments below include the net impact of Penns Woods loan accretion, CDI amortization and the elimination of merger-related costs and day 1 provision expense for non-PCD acquired loans. The Company expects to achieve further operating cost savings and other business synergies, as a result of the acquisition, which are not reflected in the pro forma amounts below (dollars in thousands):

(1) Includes net interest income and total noninterest income

The Company's operating results for the year ended December 31, 2025 includes the operating results of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities of Penns Woods subsequent to the acquisition on July 25, 2025. Due to the conversion of Penns Woods systems occurring at the merger date, as well as other streamlining and integration of the operating activities into those of the Company, historical reporting for the former Penns Woods operations is impracticable and thus disclosures of the revenue from the assets acquired and net income is impracticable for the period subsequent to acquisition.

(4)Leases

Lease expense for these leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, with variable lease payments recognized in the period those payments are incurred. The components of lease cost recognized within our Consolidated Statements of Income were as follows:

Amounts reported in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition were as follows:

Other information related to leases were as follows:

Amounts disclosed for ROU assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations include amounts added to the carrying amount of ROU assets resulting from lease modifications and reassessments.

Maturities of lease liabilities by fiscal year for our operating leases are as follows:

Rental expense for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 was $9 million, $8 million and $7 million, respectively.

(5)Marketable Securities

Marketable securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2025 are as follows:

Marketable securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 2025 are as follows:

Marketable securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2024 are as follows:

Marketable securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 2024 are as follows:

The following table shows the contractual maturity of our residential mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2025:

The following table shows the contractual maturity of our residential mortgage-backed securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 2025:

The following table presents information regarding the issuers and the carrying values of our residential mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2025 and 2024:

Marketable securities having a carrying value of $899 million at December 31, 2025 were pledged under collateral agreements. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we sold marketable securities classified as available-for-sale for $80 million from the Penns Woods merger, withno gross realized gains or losses. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we sold marketable securities classified as available-for-sale for $276 million, with gross realized losses of $39 million. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we sold marketable securities classified as available-for-sale for $101 million, with gross realized gains of $9,000 and gross realized losses of $8 million. During the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, we didnot recognize an allowance for credit losses in our investment portfolio.

The following table shows the fair value and gross unrealized losses on available for sale investment securities and held to maturity investment securities, for which an allowance for credit losses has not been recorded, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2025:

The following table shows the fair value and gross unrealized losses on available for sale investment securities and held to maturity investment securities, for which an allowance for credit losses has not been recorded, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2024:

The Company does not believe that the available-for-sale debt securities that were in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2025, which were comprised of 233 individual securities, represents a credit loss impairment. All of these securities were issued by U.S. government agencies, U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, local municipalities, or represent corporate debt. The securities issued by the U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises are either explicitly or implicitly guaranteed by the U.S. government, are highly rated by major rating agencies and have a long history of no credit losses. The corporate debt issues and securities issued by local municipalities were all highly rated by major rating agencies and have no history of credit losses. The unrealized losses were primarily attributable to changes in the interest rate environment and not due to the credit quality of these investment securities. The Company does not have the intent to sell these investment securities and it is likely that we will not be required to sell these securities before their anticipated recovery, which may be at maturity.

All of the Company’s held-to-maturity debt securities are issued by U.S. government-sponsored agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises. These securities are either explicitly or implicitly guaranteed by the U.S. government, are highly rated by major rating agencies and have a long history of no credit losses. The decline in fair value of the held-to-maturity debt securities were primarily attributable to changes in the interest rate environment and not due to the credit quality of these investment securities, therefore, the Company did not record an allowance for credit losses for these securitiesas of December 31, 2025.

The following table presents the credit quality for our held-to-maturity securities, based on the latest information available as of December 31, 2025 (in thousands). The credit ratings are sourced from nationally recognized rating agencies, which include Moody’s and S&P, they are presented based on asset type. All of our held-to-maturity securities were current in their payment of principal and interest as of December 31, 2025.

(6)Loans Receivable

The following tables excludes loans held for sale. The following table shows a summary of our loans receivable at amortized cost basis at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 (in thousands):

(1)Includes $8 million and $60 million of net unearned income, unamortized premiums and discounts and deferred fees and costs at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we serviced loans for others approximating $239 million and $244 million, respectively. These loans serviced for others are not our assets and are not included in our financial statements.

As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, approximately 39% and 36% of our loan portfolio was secured by properties located in Pennsylvania. We do not believe we have significant concentrations of credit risk to any one group of borrowers given our underwriting and collateral requirements.

Loans receivable as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 include $5.6 billion and $4.3 billion, respectively, of adjustable rate loans and $7.4 billion and $6.9 billion, respectively, of fixed rate loans.

The following table provides information related to the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment and by class of financing receivable for the year ended December 31, 2025 (in thousands):

(1) Includes initial day 1 allowance on non-PCD loans acquired from Penns Woods of $20.6 million

(2) Net charge-offs and associated metrics for the year ended December 31, 2025 exclude $18.1 million of charge-offs recognized immediately upon completion of the Penns Woods acquisition and related to required purchase accounting treatment

During the year ended December 31, 2025, we didnot sell any loans that were were classified as held-for-investment.

The following table provides information related to the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment and by class of financing receivable for the year ended December 31, 2024 (in thousands):

During the year ended December 31, 2024, we sold $24 million of loans that were transferred from held-for-investment to held for sale, with a charge-off of $5 million, recorded as part of the transfer.

The following table provides information related to the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment and by class of financing receivable for the year ended December 31, 2023 (in thousands):

During the year ended December 31, 2023, we sold $8.0 million of loans that were classified as held-for-investment, for a gain of $726,000, which is reported in gain on sale of loans on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

The following table provides information related to the loan portfolio by portfolio segment and by class of financing receivable at December 31, 2025 (in thousands):

The following table provides information related to the loan portfolio by portfolio segment and by class of financing receivable at December 31, 2024 (in thousands):

We present the amortized cost of our loans on nonaccrual status including such loans with no allowance. The following table presents the amortized cost of our loans on nonaccrual status as of the beginning and end of the year ended December 31, 2025 (in thousands):

During the year ended December 31, 2025, we didnot recognized any interest income on nonaccrual loans.

The following table presents the amortized cost of our loans on nonaccrual status as of the beginning and end of the year ended December 31, 2024, (in thousands):

During the year ended December 31, 2024, we didnot recognized any interest income on nonaccrual loans.

A loan is considered to be collateral dependent when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the sale or operation of the collateral. The following table presents the amortized cost basis of collateral-dependent loans by class of loans as of December 31, 2025 (in thousands):

The following table presents the amortized cost basis of collateral-dependent loans by class of loans as of December 31, 2024 (in thousands):

Occasionally, the Company modifies loans to borrowers in financial distress by providing principal forgiveness, term extensions, an other-than-insignificant payment delay, or interest rate reduction. When principal forgiveness is provided, the amount of forgiveness is charged off against the allowance for credit losses.

In some cases, the Company provides multiple types of concessions to one loan. Typically, one type of concession, such as a term extension, is granted initially. If the borrower continues to experience financial difficulty, another concession, such as principal forgiveness, may be granted. For loans included in the “combination” columns below, multiple types of modifications have been made on the same loan within the current reporting period. The combination is at least two of the following: a term extension, principal forgiveness, an other-than-insignificant payment delay, and/or an interest rate reduction.

The following tables present the amortized cost basis of loans for the periods indicated that were both experiencing financial difficulty and modified during the periods indicated, by class and by type of modification. The percentage of the amortized cost basis of loans that were modified to borrowers in financial distress as compared to the amortized cost basis of each class of financial receivable is also presented below (dollars in thousands).

The following table presents the effect of the loan modifications presented above to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty for the periods indicated:

The Company closely monitors the performance of loans that are modified to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty to understand the effectiveness of its modification efforts. The following table presents the performance of loans that such loans have been modified within the previous twelve months of December 31, 2025(in thousands):

The following table presents the performance of loans that such loans have been modified within the previous twelve months of December 31, 2024(in thousands):

The following table presents the performance of loans that such loans have been modified within the previous twelve months of December 31, 2023(in thousands):

A modification is considered to be in default when the loan is 90 days or more past due. The following table provides the amortized cost basis of financing receivables that had a payment default during the periods indicated and were modified within the previous twelve months to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty (in thousands):

The modifications to borrowers experiencing financial distress are included in their respective portfolio segment and the current loan balance and updated loan terms are run through their respective allowance for credit losses (ACL) models to arrive at the quanti tative portion of the ACL. Subsequent performance of the loans will be measured by delinquency status and will be captured through our ACL models or our qualitative factor assessment, as deemed appropriate. If we no longer believe the loan demonstrates similar risks to their respective portfolio segment an individual assessment will be performed. Upon the Company’s determination that a modified loan (or portion of a loan) has subsequently been deemed uncollectible, the loan (or a portion of the loan) is written off. Therefore, the amortized cost basis of the loan is reduced by the uncollectible amount and the allowance for credit losses is adjusted by the same amount.

The following table provides information related to the amortized cost basis of loan payment delinquencies at December 31, 2025 (in thousands):

The following table provides information related to the amortized cost basis loan payment delinquencies at December 31, 2024 (in thousands):

Credit Quality Indicators: For Commercial Banking loans we categorize loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. We analyze loans individually by classifying the loans by credit risk. Credit relationships greater than or equal to $1.0 million classified as special mention or substandard are reviewed quarterly for deterioration or improvement to determine if the loan is appropriately classified. We use the following definitions for risk ratings other than pass:

Special Mention — Loans designated as special mention have specific, well-defined risk issues, which create a high level of uncertainty regarding the long-term viability of the business. Loans in this class are considered to have high-risk characteristics. A special mention loan exhibits material negative financial trends due to company-specific or systemic conditions. If these potential weaknesses are not mitigated, they threaten the borrower’s capacity to meet its debt obligations. Special mention loans still demonstrate sufficient financial flexibility to react to and positively address the root cause of the adverse financial trends without significant deviations from their current business strategy. Their potential weaknesses deserve our close attention and warrant enhanced monitoring.

Substandard — Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and payment capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful — Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard. In addition, those weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable. A loan classified as doubtful exhibits discernible loss potential, but a complete loss seems very unlikely. The possibility of a loss on a doubtful loan is high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific pending factors that may strengthen the loan, its classification as an estimated loss is deferred until a more exact status can be determined.

Loss — Loans classified as loss are considered uncollectible and of such value that the continuance as a loan is not warranted. A loss classification does not mean that the loan has no recovery or salvage value; instead, it means that it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off all or a portion of a basically worthless loan even though partial recovery may be possible in the future.

For Personal Banking loans a pass risk rating is maintained until they are greater than 90 days past due, and risk rating reclassification is based primarily on past due status of the loan. The risk rating categories can generally be described by the following groupings:

Pass — Loans classified as pass are homogeneous loans that are less than 90 days past due from the required payment date at month-end.

Substandard — Loans classified as substandard are homogeneous loans that are greater than 90 days past due from the required payment date at month-end or homogenous retail loans that are greater than 180 days past due from the requirement payment date at month-end that has been written down to the value of underlying collateral, less costs to sell.

Doubtful — Loans classified as doubtful are homogeneous loans that are greater than 180 days past due from the required payment date at month-end and not written down to the value of underlying collateral. These loans are generally charged-off in the month in which the 180 day period elapses.

The following table presents the amortized cost basis of our loan portfolio by year of origination and credit quality indicator and the current period charge-offs by year of origination for each portfolio segment as of December 31, 2025 (in thousands):

For the year ended December 31, 2025, $16 million of revolving loans were converted to term loans.

The following table summarizes amortized cost basis loan balances by year of origination, class of loans, and risk category as of December 31, 2024 (in thousands):

For the year ended December 31, 2024, $16 million of revolving loans were converted to term loans.

Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to off-balance-sheet financial instruments is represented by the contract amount of the financial instrument. We use the same credit policies in making commitments for off- balance-sheet financial instruments as we do for on-balance-sheet instruments. Financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 are presented in the following table (in thousands):

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. We evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral we obtain upon extension of credit is based on management’s credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but generally may include cash, marketable securities, real estate and other property.

Outstanding loan commitments at December 31, 2025 for fixed rate loans were $75 million. The interest rates on these commitments approximate market rates at December 31, 2025. Outstanding loan commitments at December 31, 2025 for adjustable rate loans were $284 million. The fair values of these commitments are affected by fluctuations in market rates of interest.

We issue standby letters of credit in the normal course of business. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally are contingent upon the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with the third party. We are required to perform under a standby letter of credit when drawn upon by the guaranteed third party in the case of nonperformance by our customer. The credit risk associated with standby letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers and is subject to normal credit policies. Collateral may be obtained based on management’s credit assessment of the customer. As of December 31, 2025, the maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these standby letters of credit is $66 million, of which $63 million is fully collateralized. A liability (which represents deferred income) of $1 million has been recognized for the obligations as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and there are no recourse provisions that would enable us to recover any amounts from third parties.

In addition, we maintain a $21 million credit limit with a correspondent bank for private label credit card facilities for certain existing commercial clients of the Bank, of which $13 million of the credit limit was allocated to credit cards that have been issued. These issued credit cards had an outstanding balance of $3 million at December 31, 2025. The clients of the Bank are responsible for repaying any balances due on these credit cards directly to the correspondent bank; however, if the customer fails to repay their balance, the Bank could be required to satisfy the obligation to the correspondent bank and initiate collection from our customer as part of the existing credit facility of that customer.

(7)Accrued Interest Receivable

Accrued interest receivable as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 is presented in the following table:

(8)FHLB Stock

Northwest Bank is a member of the FHLB of Pittsburgh and a former member of the FHLB of Indianapolis. As a member of the FHLB of Pittsburgh, we are required to maintain a minimum investment in capital stock of the FHLB of Pittsburgh based upon membership, level of borrowings, collateral balances or participation in other programs. As a former member of the FHLB of Indianapolis, we were required to maintain a minimum investment in the capital stock of the FHLB of Indianapolis based upon participation in certain past programs.

Our investment in the capital stock of the FHLB of Pittsburgh at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 was $37 million and $18 million, respectively. In addition, our investment in the capital stock of the FHLB of Indianapolis at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 was $0 million and $$3 million, respectively. We received dividends on capital stock during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 of $2 million.

(9)Premises and Equipment

Premises and equipment at December 31, 2025 and 2024 are summarized by major classification in the following table:

Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 was $12 million, $11 million, and $12 million, respectively.

(10)Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The following table provides information for intangible assets subject to amortization for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:

The following information shows the actual aggregate amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 as well as the estimated aggregate amortization expense, based upon current levels of intangible assets, for each of the five succeeding fiscal years:

The following table provides information for the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill:

We performed our annual goodwill impairment test as of June 30, 2025, 2024, and 2023 in accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles— Goodwill and Other, and concluded that goodwill was not impaired. As of December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, there were no events or changes in circumstances that would cause us to update that year’s goodwill impairment test and we concluded there wasno impairment of goodwill as of such dates.

(11)Deposits

Deposit balances at December 31, 2025 and 2024 are shown in the table below:

(1)Includes $193 million and $201 million of brokered deposits at December 31, 2025 and 2024.

The aggregate amount of time deposits with a minimum denomination of $250,000 at December 31, 2025 and 2024 was $2.9 billion and $373.9 billion, respectively.

Generally, deposits in excess of $250,000 are not federally insured. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had $2.0 billion and $1.9 billion of deposits in accounts exceeding $250,000, respectively.

The following table summarizes the interest expense incurred on the respective deposits for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023:

(1)Includes $6 million, $18 million, and $8 million of interest expense on brokered deposits at December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023.

(12) Borrowings

(a) Borrowed Funds

Borrowed funds at December 31, 2025 and 2024 are presented in the following table:

Borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Banks (“FHLB”) of Pittsburgh, if any, are secured by our residential first mortgage and other qualifying loans. At December 31, 2025, the carrying value of these loans was $6.3 billion. Certain of these borrowings are subject to restrictions or penalties in the event of prepayment.

The revolving line of credit with the FHLB of Pittsburgh carries a commitment of $250 million. The rate is adjusted daily by the FHLB of Pittsburgh, and any borrowings on this line may be repaid at any time without penalty. At December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, there was no balance outstanding on the the revolving line of credit.

At December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, collateralized borrowings due within one year were $8 million and $22 million, respectively. These borrowings are collateralized by cash or various securities held in safekeeping by the FHLB. At December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the carrying value of the cash and securities used as collateral was $33 million and $36 million, respectively.

At December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, collateral received was $0 million and $3 million, respectively. This represents collateral posted to us from our derivative counterparties.

At December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, term notes payable to the FHLB of Pittsburgh due within one year were $333 million and $175 million, respectively. At December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 the term notes payable to the FHLB of Pittsburgh due in more than one year was $105 million and $0 million, respectively.

The bank had FHLB letters of credit in the amount of $575 million which was pledged as collateral for public fund deposits at December 31, 2025 and 2024

(b) Subordinated Debt

On September 9, 2020, the Company issued $125 million of 4.00% fixed-to-floating rate subordinated notes with a maturity date of September 15, 2030. The subordinated notes, which qualify as Tier 2 capital, subject to certain limitations based on maturity date, bear interest at an annual rate of 4.00%, payable semi-annually in arrears commencing on March 15, 2021, and a floating rate of interest equivalent to the 3-month Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) plus 3.89% payable quarterly in arrears commencing on December 15, 2025. During 2022 the Company repurchased $10 million of subordinated notes leaving $115 million of subordinated notes outstanding as of December 31, 2025. The subordinated debt issuance costs of approximately $2 million were amortized over five years on a straight-line basis into interest expense. At both December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, subordinated debentures, net of issuance costs, were $115 million. For each of the years ended December 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, total interest expense paid on the subordinate notes was $6 million, $5 million, and $5 million respectively.

(c) Junior Subordinate Debentures

The Company hasseven statutory business trusts: Northwest Bancorp Capital Trust III, a Delaware statutory business trust, Northwest Bancorp Statutory Trust IV, a Connecticut statutory business trust, LNB Trust II, a Delaware statutory business trust, Union National

Capital Trust I (“UNCT I”), a Delaware statutory business trust, Union National Capital Trust II (“UNCT II”), a Delaware statutory business trust, MFBC Statutory Trust I, a Delaware statutory trust, and Universal Preferred Trust, a Delaware statutory trust (the “Trusts”). The Trusts exist solely to issue preferred securities to third parties for cash, issue common securities to the Company in exchange for capitalization of the Trusts, invest the proceeds from the sale of trust securities in an equivalent amount of debentures of the Company, and engage in other activities that are incidental to those previously listed.

The Trusts have invested the proceeds of the offerings in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued by the Company. The structure of these debentures mirrors the structure of the trust-preferred securities. These subordinated debentures are the sole assets of the Trusts. As the shareholders of the trust preferred securities are the primary beneficiaries of the Trusts, the Trusts are not consolidated in our financial statements.

The following table sets forth a summary of the cumulative trust preferred securities and the junior subordinated debt held by the Trust as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.

(1) Net of discounts due to the fair value adjustment made at the time of acquisition.

Cash distributions on the trust securities are made on a quarterly basis to the extent interest on the debentures is received by the Trusts. We have the right to defer payment of interest on the subordinated debentures at any time, or from time-to-time, for periods not exceeding five years. If interest payments on the subordinated debentures are deferred, the distributions on the trust securities also are deferred. To date there have beenno interest deferrals. Interest on the subordinated debentures and distributions on the trust securities is cumulative. Our obligation constitutes a full, irrevocable, and unconditional guarantee on a subordinated basis of the obligations of the trust under the preferred securities. For the years ended December 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2023, total interest expense paid on the trust preferred securities was $8 million, $10 million, and $9 million respectively.

The Trusts must redeem the preferred securities when the debentures are paid at maturity or upon an earlier redemption of the debentures to the extent the debentures are redeemed. All or part of the debentures may be redeemed at any time.

(13) Income Taxes

Total income tax was allocated for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 as follows

Income tax expense applicable to income before taxes consists of:

We didnot have any income tax expense (benefit) in foreign jurisdictions for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023.

Income taxes paid in the current period in accordance with ASU 2023-09 for the year ended December 31, 2025 is as follows:

A reconciliation of the expected federal statutory income tax rate to the effective rate in accordance with ASU 2023-09 for the year ended December 31, 2025 is as follows:

(a) State taxes in Pennsylvania make up the majority (greater than 50%) of the tax effect in this category.

(b) Tax credits are net of associated investment impacts, such as proportional amortization and tax benefits of flow through losses.

A reconciliation of the expected federal statutory income tax rate to the effective rate before the adoption of ASU 2023-09, expressed as a percentage of pretax income for the year ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, is as follows:

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2025 and 2024 are presented below:

We have $14 million of Indiana net operating loss carryovers subject to annual limitation as Indiana conforms to the Internal Revenue Code Section 382 at December 31, 2025 and $20 million as of December 31, 2024. The carryovers begin to expire in 2026. Due to limitation, we do not currently expect to realize $8 million of the Indiana net operating loss carryover for both December 31, 2025 and 2024. This is netted against the net operating loss deferred tax asset in the preceding table.

The holding company has net operating loss carryforwards with the state of Pennsylvania of $169 million as of December 31, 2025 and $102 million as of December 31, 2024. The company has recorded a full valuation allowance against these carryforward attributes of Northwest Bancshares Inc. as it is not expected to realize these losses given the profitability of Northwest Bancshares for Pennsylvania tax purposes. The valuation allowance is netted against the net operating loss in the preceding table.

We recorded $0.2 million a valuation allowance against state deferred tax assets of a Northwest subsidiary since the subsidiary is not expected to utilize its deferred tax assets in the foreseeable future. This valuation allowance is netted against the net operating loss in the preceding table.

Other than stated above, we have determined thatno valuation allowance is necessary for the deferred tax assets because it is more likely than not that these assets will be realized through future reversals of existing temporary differences and through future taxable income. We will continue to review the criteria related to the recognition of deferred tax assets on a regular basis.

We utilize a comprehensive approach to recognize, measure, present and disclose in our financial statements uncertain tax positions that the company has taken or expects to take on a tax return. We recognize interest accrued and penalties (if any) related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The accrual for interest and penalties was not material for all years presented.

The following table presents changes in unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023:

We are subject to routine audits of our tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service as well as all states in which we conduct business. We are subject to audit by the Internal Revenue Service for the tax periods ended after December 31, 2021 and generally subject to audit by any state in which we conduct business for the tax periods ended after December 31, 2021.

(14)Shareholders’ Equity

Retained earnings are partially restricted in connection with regulations related to the insurance of deposit accounts, which requires Northwest to maintain certain statutory reserves. Northwest may not pay dividends on or repurchase any of its common stock if the effect thereof would reduce retained earnings below the level of adequate capitalization as defined by federal and state regulators.

In tax years prior to fiscal 1997, Northwest was permitted, under the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”), to deduct an annual addition to a reserve for bad debts in determining taxable income, subject to certain limitations. Bad debt deductions for income tax purposes are included in taxable income of later years only if the bad debt reserve is used subsequently for purposes other than to absorb bad debt losses. There was no required recapture of the pre-1988 reserves. The pre-1988 reserves would only be subject to recapture and income if there is a distribution in excess of earnings and profits or liquidation. Retained earnings at December 31, 2025 and 2024 include approximately $39 million representing such bad debt deductions for which no deferred income taxes have been provided.

(15)Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per common share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, without considering any dilutive items. Diluted EPS is calculated using both the two-class and the treasury stock methods with the more dilutive method used to determine diluted EPS. The two-class method was used to determine basic EPS and the treasury stock method was used to determine diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. The two-class method was used to determine basic and diluted EPS for the year ended December 31, 2023. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023.

(1) Reflects the total number of shares related to outstanding options that have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the impact would have been anti-dilutive.

(16)Employee Benefit Plans

(a) Pension Plans

We maintain noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees and members of our board of directors. Retirement benefits are based on certain compensation levels, age, and length of service. Contributions are based on an actuarially determined amount to fund not only benefits attributed to service to date but also for those expected to be earned in the future. In addition, we have an unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) to compensate those executive participants eligible for the defined benefit pension plan whose benefits are limited by Section 415 of the IRC.

We also sponsor a retirement savings plan in which substantially all employees participate. We provide a matching contribution of 100% of each employee’s contribution to a maximum of 4% of the employee’s eligible bi-weekly compensation.

Effective August 1, 2020, the Northwest Pension Plan was amended to include a soft freeze. The soft freeze will allow those employees in an eligible position that were hired, rehired, or acquired on or before July 31, 2020, to continue to vest and accrue additional benefits for each year they are credited with 1,000 hours or more. Employees that are hired, rehired, acquired, or transfer to an eligible job classification on or after August 1, 2020 are not eligible to participate in the Pension Plan. We also acquired a noncontributory defined benefit plan as part of our acquisition of Penns Woods during the year. This plan was frozen prior to the acquisition. The tables below presented a combined view of our benefit plans unless otherwise stated.

Total expense for the defined contribution retirement savings plan was $5 million, $2 million, and $4 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, and net periodic pension expense for the defined benefit pension plan was a benefit of $0.2 million, $3 million, and $1 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Components of net periodic pension cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income:

The following table sets forth components of net periodic pension cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023.

The estimated net gain and prior service credit for the defined benefit pension plan that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic cost ending December 31, 2026 is $774,000 and $0, respectively.

The following table sets forth information for the defined benefit pension plans’ funded status at December 31, 2025 and 2024:

The following table sets forth the assumptions used to develop the net periodic pension cost:

The following table sets forth the assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at the end of each period:

The expected long-term rate of return on assets is based on the expected return of each of the asset categories, weighted based on the median of the target allocation for each category. We used the FTSE Above the Mean AA Discount Curve matching the duration of our benefit payments as of the measurement date, December 31 2025, to determine the discount rate.

The accumulated benefit obligation for the funded defined benefit pension plans was $171 million, $160 million, and $183 million at December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation for all unfunded defined benefit plans was $2 million, $2 million, and $2 million at December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

The following table sets forth certain information related to our pension plans:

Because of the current funding status, we do not anticipate a funding requirement for either plan during the year ending December 31, 2026.

The investment policy as established by the Plan Administrative Committee, to be followed by the Trustee, is to invest assets based on the target allocations shown in the table below. To meet target allocation ranges set forth by the Plan Administrative Committee, periodically, the assets are reallocated by the Trustee. The investment policy is reviewed periodically to determine if the policy should be changed. Pension assets are conservatively invested with the goal of providing market or better returns with below market risks. Assets are invested in a balanced portfolio composed primarily of equities, fixed income, and cash or cash equivalent investments. The Trustee tries to maintain an approximate asset mix positionof 50% to 80% bonds and 20% to 35%equities for the Northwest Bank plan andan approximate asset mix positionof 0% to 15% bonds and 65% to 85%equities and 5% to 40% other for the Penns Wood plan.

A maximum of 10% may be invested in any one stock, including the stock of Northwest Bancshares, Inc. The objective of holding equity securities is to provide capital appreciation consistent with the ownership of the common stocks of medium to large companies. Acceptable bond investments are direct or agency obligations of the U.S. Government or investment grade corporate bonds. The average maturity of the bond portfolio shall not exceedten years.

The following table sets forth the weighted average asset allocation of defined benefit plans for Northwest Bank:

The following table sets forth the weighted average asset allocation of defined benefit plans for Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc.:

All of the assets held by the defined benefit pension plan are measured and recorded at estimated fair value on our balance sheet on a recurring basis as Level 1 assets, as defined by the fair value hierarchy definedin Note 17. The following table sets forth the pension plan assets as of December 31, 2025 and 2024.

(1) The defined benefit pension plan statement of net assets also includes accrued interest and dividends resulting in net assets available for benefits of $254 million and $220 million, respectfully.

The benefits expected to be paid in each year from 2026 to 2030 are $12.1 million, $12.3 million, $12.6 million, $13.0 million and $12.9 million, respectively. The aggregate benefits expected to be paid in the five years from 2030 to 2035 are $63.7 million. The expected benefits to be paid are based on the same assumptions used to measure our benefit obligations at December 31, 2025 and include estimated future employee service.

(b) Stock-based Compensation

Stock-based awards are eligible for issuance under the our equity incentive plans to executives, directors and key employees of the Northwest Bancshares and its subsidiaries. On May 18, 2022, shareholders approved the Northwest Bancshares, Inc. 2022 Equity Incentive Plan with up to 3,500,000 shares authorized for award. This plan provides for the granting of stock options, restricted stock awards (“RSAs”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance awards. At December 31, 2025917,306 shares were available for future grants.

We issue shares to fulfill stock-based award vesting from available authorized common shares. At December 31,2025, we believe there are adequate authorized common shares to satisfy anticipated stock-based vesting for all grants outstanding.

Stock-based compensation expense was $6 million, $6 million and $4 million and was included in compensation and employee benefits expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income during the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. The effect on net income for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 was a reduction of $4 million, $4 million and $3 million, respectively.

Restricted Stock Awards, Restricted Stock Units and Performance Share Units

Restricted stock awards, Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs") and Performance Share Units (“PSUs”) are all issued subject to service restrictions. PSUs are payable contingent on the achievement of certain predefined performance objectives over athree-year measurement period with the actual number of shares issuable ranging between 0% and 150% of the number of PSUs granted. RSAs accumulate dividends that are paid upon vesting. Beginning in 2025 our RSUs and PSUs accrue a dividend equivalent that is paid upon vesting.

The following table summarizes the status of our restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and performance share units as of December 31, 2025, and the activity for the year ended December 31, 2025:

At December 31, 2025, there was compensation expense of $5.5 million to be recognized for awarded but unvested RSUs and $3.7 million to be recognized for awarded but unvested PSUs, both with a weighted-average expense recognition period remaining of 1.5 years. At December 31, 2025, there was compensation expense of $240,641 to be recognized for awarded but unvested RSAs, with a weighted-average expense recognition period remaining ofone year.

(c) Stock Option Plans

There wereno stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2025, December 31, 2024 or December 31, 2023. Previously granted options were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

The following table summarizes the activity in our option plans during the years ended December 31, 2025 (amounts in thousands except for per share and options):

(1)The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $154,000.

(17) Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We are required to disclose fair value information about financial instruments whether or not recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition. Fair value information of certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments is not required to be disclosed. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company.

Financial assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis and certain financial assets and liabilities on a non-recurring basis are accounted for using a three-level hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. This hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices with readily available independent data in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable market inputs (Level 3). When various inputs for measurement fall within different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the lowest level input that has a significant impact on fair value measurement is used.

Financial assets and liabilities are categorized based upon the following characteristics or inputs to the valuation techniques:

•Level 1 — Financial assets and liabilities for which inputs are observable and are obtained from reliable quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in actively traded markets. This is the most reliable fair value measurement and includes, for example, active exchange-traded equity securities.

•Level 2 — Financial assets and liabilities for which values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or for which values are based on similar assets or liabilities that are actively traded. Level 2 also includes pricing models in which the inputs are corroborated by market data, for example, matrix pricing.

•Level 3 — Financial assets and liabilities for which values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. Level 3 inputs include the following:

◦Quotes from brokers or other external sources that are not considered binding;

◦Quotes from brokers or other external sources where it cannot be determined that market participants would in fact transact for the asset or liability at the quoted price; and

◦Quotes and other information from brokers or other external sources where the inputs are not deemed observable.

We are responsible for the valuation process and as part of this process may use data from outside sources in establishing fair value. We perform due diligence to understand the inputs used or how the data was calculated or derived. We also corroborate the reasonableness of external inputs in the valuation process.

The carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition approximate fair value for the following financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities available-for-sale, loans held-for-sale, accrued interest receivable, interest rate lock commitments, forward commitments, interest rate swaps, savings and checking deposits, foreign exchange swaps, risk participation agreements, and accrued interest payable.

Marketable Securities

Where available, market values are based on quoted market prices, dealer quotes, and prices obtained from independent pricing services.

Debt Securities — available-for-sale - Generally, debt securities are valued using pricing for similar securities, recently executed transactions and other pricing models utilizing observable inputs. The valuation for most debt securities is classified as Level 2. Securities within Level 2 include corporate bonds, municipal bonds, mortgage-backed securities and U.S. government and agency debt securities.

Debt Securities — held-to-maturity - The fair value of debt securities held-to-maturity is determined in the same manner as debt securities available-for-sale.

Loans Receivable

Loans with comparable characteristics including collateral and re-pricing structures are segregated for valuation purposes. Each loan pool is separately valued utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis. Projected monthly cash flows are discounted to present value using a market rate for comparable loans, which is not considered an exit price. Characteristics of comparable loans include remaining term, coupon interest, and estimated prepayment speeds. Delinquent loans are separately evaluated given the impact delinquency has on the projected future cash flow of the loan including the approximate discount or market rate, which is not considered an exit price.

Loans Held-for-Sale

The estimated fair value of loans held-for-sale is based on market bids obtained from potential buyers.

FHLB Stock

Due to the restrictions placed on transferability of FHLB stock, it is not practical to determine the fair value. FHLB stock is recorded at cost.

Deposit Liabilities

The estimated fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, which includes demand deposits, money market, and other savings accounts, is the amount payable on demand. Although market premiums paid for depository institutions reflect an additional value for these low-cost deposits, adjusting fair value for any value expected to be derived from retaining those deposits for a future period of time or from the benefit that results from the ability to fund interest-earning assets with these deposit liabilities is prohibited. The fair value estimates of deposit liabilities do not include the benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by these deposits compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market. Fair values for time deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies contractual cost currently being offered in the existing portfolio to current market rates being offered locally for deposits of similar remaining maturities. The valuation adjustment for the portfolio consists of the present value of the difference of these two cash flows, discounted at the assumed market rate of the corresponding maturity.

Borrowed Funds

Fixed rate advances are valued by comparing their contractual cost to the prevailing market cost. The carrying amount of repurchase agreements approximates their fair value.

Subordinated Debentures

The fair value of our subordinated debentures is calculated using the discounted cash flows at rates observable for other similarly traded liabilities with consideration given to early call provisions.

Junior Subordinated Debentures

The fair value of junior subordinated debentures is calculated using the discounted cash flows at the prevailing rate of interest.

Interest Rate Lock Commitments and Forward Commitments

The fair value of interest rate lock commitments is based on the value of underlying loans held-for-sale which is based on quoted prices for similar loans in the secondary market. This value is then adjusted based on the probability of the loan closing (i.e., the “pull-through” amount, a significant unobservable input). The fair value of forward sale commitments is based on quoted prices from the secondary market based on the settlement date of the contracts.

Cash Flow Hedges, Interest Rate and Foreign Exchange Swap Agreements and Risk Participation Agreements

The fair value of interest rate swaps is based upon the present value of the expected future cash flows using the SOFR discount curve, the basis for the underlying interest rate. To price interest rate swaps, cash flows are first projected for each payment date using the fixed rate for the fixed side of the swap and the forward rates for the floating side of the swap. These swap cash flows are then discounted to time zero using SOFR zero-coupon interest rates. The sum of the present value of both legs is the fair market value of the interest rate swap. These valuations have been derived from our third party vendor’s proprietary models rather than actual market quotations. The proprietary models are based upon financial principles and assumptions that we believe to be reasonable. The fair value of the foreign exchange swap is derived from proprietary models rather than actual market quotations. The proprietary models are based upon financial principles and assumptions that we believe to be reasonable. Risk participation agreements are entered into when Northwest purchases a portion of a commercial loan that has an interest rate swap. Northwest assumes credit risk on its portion of the interest rate swap should the borrower fail to pay as agreed. The value of risk participation agreements is determined based on the value of the swap after considering the credit quality, probability of default, and loss given default of the borrower.

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments

These financial instruments generally are not sold or traded, and estimated fair values are not readily available. However, the fair value of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements. Commitments to extend credit are generally short-term in nature and, if drawn upon, are issued under current market terms. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, there wasno significant unrealized appreciation or depreciation on these financial instruments.

The following table sets forth the carrying amount and estimated fair value of our financial instruments included in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at December 31, 2025 and 2024:

(1) Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Company to settle positive and negative positions and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties.

(1) Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Company to settle positive and negative positions and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties.

Fair value estimates are made at a point-in-time, based on relevant market data and information about the instrument. The preceding methods and assumptions were used in estimating the fair value of financial instruments at December 31, 2025 and 2024.

The following table represents assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2025:

(1) Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Company to settle positive and negative positions and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties.

The following table represents assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2024:

(1) Amounts represent the impact of legally enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Company to settle positive and negative positions and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties.

The following table presents the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis after initial recognition such as loans individually assessed, real estate owned, and MSRs.

The following table represents the fair market measurement for only those nonrecurring assets that had a fair market value below the carrying amount as of December 31, 2025:

The following table represents the fair market measurement for only those nonrecurring assets that had a fair market value below the carrying amount as of December 31, 2024:

Individually Assessed Loans — A loan is considered to be individually assessed as described in Note 1(f). We classify loans individually assessed as nonrecurring Level 3.

Real Estate Owned — Real estate owned is comprised of property acquired through foreclosure or voluntarily conveyed by borrowers. These assets are recorded on the date acquired at the lower of the related loan balance or fair value, less estimated disposition costs, with the fair value being determined by appraisal. Subsequently, foreclosed assets are valued at the lower of the amount recorded at acquisition date or fair value, less estimated disposition costs. We classify real estate owned as nonrecurring Level 3.

The following table presents additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis and for which we have utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value at December 31, 2025:

(1) Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which may include Level 3 inputs that are not identifiable, or by using the discounted cash flow method if the loan is not collateral dependent.

(18)Regulatory Capital Requirements

Financial institutions and their holding companies are subject to various regulatory capital requirements. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by the regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct, material effect on a company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, financial institutions must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of its assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting guidelines. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments made by the regulators about components, risk-weighting and other factors.

Applicable rules limit an organization’s capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments if the organization does not hold a“capital conservation buffer” consisting of 2.5% of Total, Tier 1 and Common Equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) capital to risk-weighted assets in addition to the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy, require financial institutions to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of Total, CET1 and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined). As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, we and our banking subsidiary exceeded all capital adequacy requirements to which we were subject and our regulatory capital ratios were above the minimum levels required to be considered “well capitalized” for regulatory purposes. To be considered as “well capitalized,” we and our banking subsidiary must maintain regulatory capital ratios as set forth in the table.

We have elected to phase the estimated impact of CECL into regulatory capital in accordance with the interim final rule of the Federal Reserve Board and other U.S. banking agencies that became effective on March 31, 2020. As a result, we delayed recognizing the estimated impact of CECL on regulatory capital until after a two-year deferral period, which for us extended through December 31, 2021. Beginning on January 1, 2022, we were required to phase in 75% of the previously deferred estimated capital impact of CECL, with 50% to be phased in at the beginning of 2023, and 25% at the beginning of 2024, until fully phased in by the first quarter of 2025. Under the interim final rule, the estimated impact of CECL on regulatory capital that we will defer and later phase in is calculated as the entire day-one impact at adoption plus 25% of the subsequent change in allowance during the two-year deferral period.

The actual, minimum required, and well capitalized levels as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 were as follows:

(1) The capital conservation buffer of 2.5% does not apply to Tier 1 capital to average assets (leverage ratio). For further information related to the capital conservation buffer, see “Item 1. Business—Supervision and Regulation”.

(2) Reflects the well-capitalized standard applicable to Northwest Bank and the well-capitalized standard applicable to the Company under the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation Y.

(1) We elected to temporarily delay the estimated impact of current expected credit losses ("CECL") on regulatory capital in accordance with a rule of the Federal Reserve Board and other U.S. banking agencies for a two-year deferral period, followed by a three-year transition period which began January 1, 2022. As of December 31, 2024,75% of the impact of the CECL deferral was phased, while the impact of the CECL deferral was fully phased in as of June 30, 2025.

(2) The 2024 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% does not apply to Tier 1 capital to average assets (leverage ratio). For further information related to the capital conservation buffer, see“Item 1. Business—Supervision and Regulation”.

(3) Reflects the well-capitalized standard applicable to Northwest Bank and the well-capitalized standard applicable to the Company under the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation Y.

(19)Contingent Liabilities

We and our subsidiaries are subject to a number of asserted and unasserted claims encountered in the normal course of business. Management believes that the aggregate liability, if any, that may result from such potential litigation will not have a material adverse effect on our financial statements. However, we cannot presently determine whether or not any claims against us will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in any future reporting period.

(20)Legal Proceedings

We establish accruals for legal proceedings when information related to the loss contingencies represented by those matters indicates both that a loss is probable and that the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. As of December 31, 2025, we do not anticipate that the aggregate ultimate liability arising out of any pending or threatened legal proceedings will be material to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Any such accruals are adjusted thereafter as appropriate to reflect changes in circumstances. Due to the inherent subjectivity of assessments and unpredictability of outcomes of legal proceedings, any amounts accrued may not represent the ultimate loss to us from legal proceedings.

(21)Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The following table sets forth the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss as of December 31, 2025 and 2024:

The following table shows the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component for the year ended December 31, 2025:

(1)Consists of unrealized holding gains, net of tax of $(11,002).

(2)Change in fair value of interest rate swaps, net of tax of $676.

(3)Consists of unrealized gains, net of tax of $(3,313).

(4)Consists of realized securities losses, net of tax of $(14).

(5)Consists of realized pension gains, net of tax of $255.

The following table shows the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component for the year ended December 31, 2024:

(1)Consists of unrealized holding losses, net of tax of $1,193.

(2)Change in fair value of interest rate swaps, net of tax of $(448).

(3)Consists of unrealized gains, net of tax of $(6,895).

(4)Consists of realized losses, net of tax of $(7,706).

(5)Consists of realized gains, net of tax of $591.

The following table shows the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component for the year ended December 31, 2023:

(1)Consists of unrealized holding gain, net of tax of $(3,429).

(2)Change in fair value of interest rate swaps, net of tax of $110

(3)Consists of unrealized gains, net of tax of $(3,961).

(4)Consists of realized losses, net of tax of $(1,700).

(5)Consists of realized gains, net of tax of $607.

(22)Segment Information

The Company’s reportable segment is determined by the Chief Executive Officer, who is the designated chief operating decision maker, based upon information provided about the Company’s products and services offered, primarily banking operations. Ourone operating segment, Banking, is also distinguished by the level of information provided to the chief operating decision maker, who uses such information to review performance of the various components of the business such as branches and lending, which are then aggregated because operating performance, products/services and customers are similar. The chief operating decision maker will evaluate the financial performance of the Company’s business components such as by evaluating revenue streams, significant expenses and budget to actual results in assessing the Company’s segment and in the determination of allocating resources. The information reviewed is on a consolidated basis and discrete financial information is not available. The chief operating decision maker uses revenue streams to evaluate product pricing and significant expenses to assess performance and evaluate return on assets. The chief operating decision maker uses consolidated net income through return on average assets and return on average equity and the efficiency ratio, as well as loan growth to benchmark the Company against its competitors. The benchmarking analysis coupled with monitoring of budget to actual results are used in assessment performance and in establishing compensation. Loans, investments, and deposits provide the revenues in the banking operation. Interest expense, provisions for credits losses and payroll provide the significant expenses in the banking operating. All operations are domestic.

Accounting policies for the segment are the same as those described in Note 1. Segment performance is evaluated using consolidated net income. Information reported internally for performance assessment by the chief operating decision maker follows, inclusive of reconciliations of significant segment totals to the financial statements:

(1) Other revenues include loan sales, gain on real estate owned, income from bank owned life insurance and other operating income.

(2) Other segment items include expenses for collections, marketing, amortization of intangibles, merger, asset disposition and restructuring and other operating expense.

(23) Parent Company Only Financial Statements - Condensed

Statements of Income

Statements of Cash Flows

(24) Derivative Financial Instruments

We are a party to derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business to manage our own exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and to meet the needs of our customers. The primary derivatives that we use are interest rate swaps and caps and foreign exchange contracts, which are entered into with counterparties that meet established credit standards. We believe that the credit risk inherent in all of our derivative contracts is minimal based on our credit standards and the netting and collateral provisions of the interest rate swap agreements.

Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments

As of December 31, 2025, the Company had entered into seven separate pay-fixed interest rate swaps in order to synthetically convert short-term three month FHLB advances to fixed-rate term funding with an aggregate value of$175 million with maturities ranging fromtwo tothree years. Our risk management objective and strategy for these interest rate swaps at such time was to reduce our exposure to variability in interest-related cash outflows attributable to changes in the USD-SOFR swap rate, the designated benchmark interest rate being hedged. Based upon our contemporaneous quantitative analysis at the inception of each interest rate swap, we have determined these interest rate swaps qualify for hedge accounting in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. Our cash flow hedges are recorded within other assets on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at their estimated fair value.

As long as the hedge remains highly effective, the changes in the fair value of derivatives designated, and that qualify, as cash flow hedges are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and are subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. A hedging relationship that is determined to not be highly effective no longer qualifies for hedge accounting and any gain or loss is recognized immediately into earnings. Amounts reclassified into earnings are included in interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

We act as an interest rate or foreign exchange swap counterparty for certain commercial borrowers in the normal course of servicing our customers, which are accounted for at fair value. We manage our exposure to such interest rate or foreign exchange swaps by entering into corresponding and offsetting interest rate swaps with third parties that mirror the terms of the swaps we have with the commercial borrowers. These positions (referred to as “customer swaps”) directly offset each other and our exposure is the fair value of the derivatives due to changes in credit risk of our commercial borrowers and third parties. Customer swaps are recorded within other assets or other liabilities on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at their estimated fair value. Changes to the fair value of assets and liabilities arising from these derivatives are included, net, in other operating income in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

We enter into interest rate lock commitments for residential mortgage loans which commit us to lend funds to a potential borrower at a specific interest rate within a specified period of time. Interest rate lock commitments that relate to the origination of mortgage loans that will be held-for-sale are considered derivative financial instruments under applicable accounting guidance. Interest rate lock commitments on loans held-for-sale are carried at fair value in other assets on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition. Northwest sells loans to the secondary market on a mandatory or best efforts basis. The loans sold on a mandatory basis commit us to deliver a specific principal amount of mortgage loans to an investor at a specified price, by a specified date, or the commitment must be paired off. These forward commitments entered into on a mandatory delivery basis meet the definition of a derivative financial instrument. All closed loans to be sold on a mandatory delivery basis are classified as held-for-sale on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition. Changes to the fair value of the interest rate lock commitments and the forward commitments are recorded in mortgage banking income in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

We enter into risk participation agreements with financial institution counterparties for interest rate swaps related to loans in which we are a participant. The risk participation agreements provide credit protection to the financial institution should the borrower fail to perform on its interest rate derivative contract with the financial institution. These risk participation agreementsare recorded within other liabilities on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at their estimated fair value. Changes to the fair value of the risk participation agreements are included in other operating income in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

The following table presents information regarding our derivative financial instruments at the dates indicated. Amounts in the table below are presented gross without the impact of any net collateral agreements (in thousands):

The following table presents income or expenses recognized on derivatives for the periods indicated (in thousands):

The following table presents information regarding our derivative financial instruments designated as hedging for the year ended December 31, 2025 (dollars in thousands):

Our derivatives are presented on a net basis taking into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements. Additionally, collateral exchanged with counterparties is also netted against the applicable derivative fair values. We enter into derivative transactions with two primary groups, banks and our customers. Different methods are utilized for managing counterparty credit exposure and credit risk for each of these groups.

The following tables present the gross amounts of these assets and liabilities with any offsets to arrive at the net amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2025 (dollars in thousands).

The following tables present the gross amounts of these assets and liabilities with any offsets to arrive at the net amounts recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands).