Seven Hills Realty Trust
For the period ended Dec 31, 2023. Filed Feb 20, 2024.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2023 · Filed Feb 20, 2024
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1. Organization
Seven Hills Realty Trust is a Maryland real estate investment trust, or REIT, that focuses primarily on originating and investing in first mortgage loans secured by middle market and transitional commercial real estate, or CRE.
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation. These consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, which requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates in the accompanying consolidated financial statements include our allowance for credit losses and the fair value of financial instruments.
Consolidation. These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ours and our subsidiaries, all of which are 100% owned directly by us. All intercompany transactions and balances with or among our consolidated subsidiaries have been eliminated.
For each loan investment we make, we evaluate whether we have a controlling financial interest and consolidation of the borrower's financial statements is required under GAAP.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. We consider highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Secured Financing Agreements. Loans financed through our Secured Financing Agreements (as defined in Note 5) are treated as collateralized financing transactions, unless they meet sales treatment under GAAP. Pursuant to GAAP treatment of collateralized financing transactions, loans financed through our Secured Financing Agreements remain on our consolidated balance sheets as assets and cash received from the purchasers is recorded on our consolidated balance sheets as liabilities. Interest paid in accordance with our Secured Financing Agreements is recorded as interest expense.
Loans Held for Investment. Generally, our loans are classified as held for investment based upon our intent and ability to hold them until maturity. Loans that are held for investment are carried at cost, net of unamortized loan origination fees, accreted exit fees, unamortized premiums and unaccreted discounts, as applicable, that are required to be recognized in the carrying value of the loans in accordance with GAAP, unless the loans are determined to be collateral dependent. Loans that we have a plan to sell or liquidate are held at the lower of cost or fair value less cost to sell.
Allowance for Credit Losses. On January 1, 2023, we adopted Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which replaces the “incurred loss” model for recognizing credit losses with a forward-looking “expected loss” model that generally will result in the earlier recognition of credit losses. The measurement of current expected credit losses, or CECL, is based upon historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts incorporating forward-looking information that affect the collectability of the reported amount. ASU No. 2016-13 is applicable to financial assets measured at amortized cost and off-balance sheet credit exposures, such as unfunded loan commitments.
The allowance for credit losses required under ASU No. 2016-13 is a valuation account that is deducted from the related loans’ amortized cost basis in our consolidated balance sheets. Our loans typically include commitments to fund incremental proceeds to borrowers over the life of the loan; these future funding commitments are also subject to the CECL model. The allowance for credit losses related to unfunded loan commitments is included in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.
Given the lack of historical loss data related to our loan portfolio, we estimate our expected losses using an analytical model that considers the likelihood of default and loss given default for each individual loan. This analytical model incorporates data from a third party database with historical loan loss information for commercial mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS, and commercial real estate, or CRE, loans since 1998. We estimate the allowance for credit losses for our loan portfolio, including unfunded loan commitments, at the individual loan level. Significant inputs to the model include certain loan specific data, such as loan to value, or LTV, property type, geographic location, occupancy, vintage year, remaining loan term, net operating income, expected timing and amounts of future loan fundings, and macroeconomic forecast assumptions, including the performance of CRE assets, unemployment rates, interest rates and other factors. We utilize the model to estimate credit losses over a reasonable and supportable economic forecast period, followed by a straight-line reversion period to average historical losses. Average historical losses are established using a population of third party historical loss data that approximates our portfolio as of the measurement date. We evaluate the estimated allowance for each of our loans individually and we consider our internal loan risk rating as the primary credit quality indicator underlying our assessment.
If a loan is determined to be collateral dependent (because the repayment of the loan is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the underlying collateral property) and the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, but foreclosure is not probable, we may elect to apply a practical expedient to determine the loan's allowance for credit losses by comparing the collateral's fair value, less costs to sell, if applicable, to the amortized cost basis of the loan. For collateral-dependent loans for which foreclosure is probable, the related allowance for credit losses is determined using the fair value, less costs to sell, if applicable, of the collateral compared to the loan's amortized cost.
Upon adoption of ASU No. 2016-13 using the modified retrospective transition method and, based on our loan portfolio, the then current economic environment and expectations for future conditions, we recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment reducing our cumulative net income in our consolidated balance sheets by $6,595, establishing an allowance for credit losses of $4,893 with respect to our then outstanding loans held for investment and increasing accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities by $1,702 with respect to our then unfunded loan commitments. No reserve for loan losses or allowance for credit losses was recognized within our consolidated financial statements prior to our adoption of ASU No. 2016-13.
Concurrent with our adoption of ASU No. 2016-13, on January 1, 2023, we adopted ASU No. 2022-02, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures, which eliminated the guidance for and recognitions of troubled debt restructurings for all entities that adopted ASU No. 2016-13. Instead, an entity must determine whether a modification results in a new loan or continuation of an existing loan under Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, 310, Receivables (Topic 310). If a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, enhanced disclosures are required. ASU No. 2022-02 also requires disclosure of current period gross write offs by year of origination. The adoption of ASU No. 2022-02 using the prospective transition method did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. See Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part IV, Item 15 of this 2023 Annual Report for further information regarding loan modifications.
We evaluate the credit quality of each of our loans at least quarterly by assessing a variety of risk factors in relation to each loan and assigning a risk rating to each loan based on those factors. Factors considered in these evaluations include, but are not limited to, property type, geographic and local market dynamics, physical condition, leasing and tenant profile, projected cash flow, risk of loss, current LTV, debt yield, collateral performance, structure, exit plan and sponsorship. Loans are rated “1” (less risk) through “5” (greater risk) as defined below:
“1” lower risk—Criteria reflects a sponsor having a strong financial condition and low credit risk and our evaluation of management's experience; collateral performance exceeding performance metrics included in the business plan or credit underwriting; and the property demonstrating stabilized occupancy and/or market rates, resulting in strong current cash flow and net operating income and/or having a very low LTV.
“2” average risk—Criteria reflects a sponsor having a stable financial condition and our evaluation of management's experience; collateral performance meeting or exceeding substantially all performance metrics included in the business plan or credit underwriting; and the property demonstrating improved occupancy at market rents, resulting in sufficient current cash flow and/or having a low LTV.
“3” acceptable risk—Criteria reflects a sponsor having a history of repaying loans at maturity and meeting its credit obligations and our evaluation of management's experience; collateral performance expected to meet performance metrics included in the business plan or credit underwriting; and the property having a moderate LTV. New loans and loans with a limited history will typically be assigned this rating and will be adjusted to other levels from time to time as appropriate.
“4” higher risk—Criteria reflects a sponsor having a history of unresolved missed or late payments, maturity extensions and difficulty timely fulfilling its credit obligations and our evaluation of management's experience; collateral performance failing to meet the business plan or credit underwriting; the existence of a risk of default possibly leading to a loss and/or potential weaknesses that deserve management’s attention; and/or the property having a high LTV.
“5” loss likely—Criteria reflects a very high risk of realizing a principal loss or having incurred a principal loss; a sponsor having a history of default payments, trouble fulfilling its credit obligations, deeds in lieu of foreclosures, and/or bankruptcies; collateral performance is significantly worse than performance metrics included in the business plan; loan covenants or performance milestones having been breached or not attained; timely exit via sale or refinancing being uncertain; and/or the property having a very high LTV.
See Note 3 for further information regarding our allowance for credit losses and our loan portfolio’s assessment under our internal risk rating policy.
Real Estate Owned. Real estate owned is property acquired in full or partial settlement of loan obligations generally through foreclosure or by deed in lieu of foreclosure. Upon acquisition, we allocate the fair value of the real estate owned in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations.
Upon acquisition, real estate owned is recognized at the lesser of the fair value of the property and the amortized cost of the loan secured by the property at the time of acquisition. We allocate the purchase price to land, building and improvements, and intangibles based on determinations of the relative fair values of these assets assuming the properties are vacant. The fair value of the property is determined using Level III inputs and standard industry valuation methods, including discounted cash flow analyses that are based on a number of factors, including capitalization rates and discount rates, among others, and sales comparisons. If the amortized cost of the loan exceeds the fair value of the property the difference is recorded through the allowance for credit losses as a write off. Conversely, if the fair value of the property exceeds the amortized cost of the loan, the difference is recorded through the allowance for credit losses as a recovery, with any excess recorded as a gain. Any related shortfall or excess of previously established allowances for credit losses is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations as a provision for or reversal of credit losses, respectively.
Subsequent to acquisition, costs incurred related to improvements to the property are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives and costs related to the operation of the property are expensed as incurred. We recognize depreciation on a straight line basis over estimated useful lives generally ranging from 7 to 40 years. The following is a summary of real estate owned presented in our consolidated balance sheets:
| December 31, 2023 | |
|---|---|
| Land | $2,880 |
| Building and improvements | 7,349 |
| Tenant improvements | 1,164 |
| Total real estate owned | 11,393 |
| Less: accumulated depreciation | (115) |
| Real estate owned, net | $11,278 |
Depreciation expense related to real estate owned for the year ended December 31, 2023 was $136 and is included in expenses from real estate owned. We did not record depreciation expense related to real estate owned during the year ended December 31, 2022.
We allocate a portion of the purchase price to acquired in place leases and tenant relationships based upon market estimates to lease up the property based on the leases in place at the time of acquisition. We allocate this aggregate value between acquired in place lease values and tenant relationships based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease. We amortize the value of acquired in place leases (included in acquired real estate leases, net in our consolidated balance sheets) over the terms of the associated leases. Such amortization, which is included in expenses from real estate owned in our consolidated income statements, amounted to $458 for the year ended December 31, 2023. We did not record any such amortization during the year ended December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2023, our acquired real estate lease obligations were as follows:
| December 31, 2023 | |
|---|---|
| Acquired real estate leases | $4,595 |
| Less: accumulated amortization | (458) |
| Acquired real estate leases, net | $4,137 |
As of December 31, 2023, the weighted average amortization periods for acquired in place lease values was 7.4 years. Future amortization of acquired in place lease values is estimated to be $771 in 2024, $594 in 2025, $493 in 2026, $493 in 2027, $466 in 2028 and $1,320 thereafter.
We regularly evaluate real estate owned for indicators of impairment. Impairment indicators may include declining tenant occupancy, lack of progress leasing vacant space, tenant bankruptcies, low long term prospects for improvement in property performance, weak or declining tenant profitability, cash flow or liquidity, our decision to dispose of an asset before the end of its estimated useful life and legislative, market or industry changes that could permanently reduce the value of a property. If there is an indication that the carrying value of an asset is not recoverable, we estimate the projected undiscounted cash flows to determine if an impairment loss should be recognized. The future net undiscounted cash flows are subjective and are based in part on assumptions regarding hold periods, market rents and terminal capitalization rates. We determine the amount of any impairment loss by comparing the carrying value to estimated fair value. We estimate fair value through an evaluation of recent financial performance and projected discounted cash flows using standard industry valuation methods.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. We determine the estimated fair value of financial assets and liabilities using the three-tier fair value hierarchy established by GAAP, which prioritizes observable inputs in active markets when measuring fair value. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value in order of priority are as follows:
Level I—Inputs include quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access.
Level II—Inputs include quoted prices in markets that are less active or inactive or for which all significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly.
Level III—Inputs include unobservable prices and are supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the overall fair value measurement.
Loan Deferred Fees. Loan origination and exit fees are fees charged to our borrowers and unamortized or unaccreted balances are reflected as a reduction in loans held for investment, net, in our consolidated balance sheets. These fees are recognized in interest income over the life of the related loans held for investment.
Deferred Financing Costs. Costs incurred in connection with financings are capitalized and recorded as a reduction to the related liability in our consolidated balance sheets. Deferred financing costs are amortized over the term of the respective financing agreement and are recorded in our consolidated statements of operations as a component of interest and related expenses.
Net Income Per Common Share. We calculate net income per common share - basic using the two class method. We calculate net income per common share - diluted using the more dilutive of the two class or treasury stock method.
Revenue Recognition. Interest income related to our first mortgage loans secured by CRE will generally be accrued based on the coupon rates applied to the outstanding principal balance of such loans. Fees, premiums and discounts, if any, will be amortized or accreted into interest income over the remaining lives of the loans using the effective interest method, as adjusted for any prepayments.
If a loan's interest or principal payments are not paid when due and there is uncertainty that such payments will be collected, the loan may be categorized as non-accrual and no interest will be recorded until it is collected. When all overdue payments are collected and, in our judgment, a loan is likely to remain current, it may be re-categorized as accrual. We did not have any non-accrual loans as of December 31, 2023.
For loans purchased at a discount, GAAP limits the yield that may be accreted (accretable yield) to the excess of the investor’s estimate of undiscounted expected principal, interest and other cash flows (cash flows expected at acquisition to be collected) over the investor’s initial investment in the loan. GAAP also requires that the excess of contractual cash flows over cash flows expected to be collected (non-accretable difference) not be recognized as an adjustment of yield, loss accrual or valuation allowance. Subsequent increases in cash flows expected to be collected from such loans generally will be recognized prospectively through adjustment of the loan’s yield over its remaining life. Decreases in cash flows expected to be collected will be recorded through our provision for credit losses.
Revenue from real estate owned represents rental income from operating leases with tenants and is recognized on a straight line basis over the lease term.
New Accounting Pronouncements. On November 27, 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures, or ASU No. 2023-07, which requires public entities to: i) provide disclosures of significant segment expenses and other segment items if they are regularly provided to the Chief Operating Decision Maker, or the CODM, and included in each reported measure of segment profit or loss; ii) provide all annual disclosures about a reportable segment’s profit or loss and assets currently required by ASC 280, Segment Reporting, or ASC 280, in interim periods; and iii) disclose the CODM’s title and position, as well as an explanation of how the CODM uses the reported measures and other disclosures. Public entities with a single reportable segment must apply all the disclosure requirements of ASU No. 2023-07, as well as all the existing segment disclosures under ASC 280. The amendments in ASU No. 2023-07 are incremental to the requirements in ASC 280 and do not change how a public entity identifies its operating segments, aggregates those operating segments, or applies the quantitative thresholds to determine its reportable segments. ASU No. 2023-07 should be applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact ASU No. 2023-07 will have on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
Note 3. Loans Held for Investment, net
We originate first mortgage loans secured by middle market and transitional CRE, which are generally to be held as long term investments.
The table below provides overall statistics for our loan portfolio as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022:
| As of December 31, | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | |
| Number of loans | 24 | 27 |
| Total loan commitments | $670,293 | $727,562 |
| Unfunded loan commitments (1) | $40,401 | $49,007 |
| Principal balance | $629,892 | $678,555 |
| Carrying value | $622,086 | $669,929 |
| Weighted average coupon rate | 9.19% | 8.07% |
| Weighted average all in yield (2) | 9.64% | 8.57% |
| Weighted average floor | 1.36% | 0.62% |
| Weighted average maximum maturity (years) (3) | 3.0 | 3.3 |
| Weighted average risk rating | 3.0 | 2.9 |
(1)Unfunded loan commitments are primarily used to finance property and building improvements and leasing capital and are generally funded over the term of the loan.
(2)All in yield represents the yield on a loan, including amortization of deferred fees over the initial term of the loan and excluding any purchase discount accretion.
(3)Maximum maturity assumes all borrower loan extension options have been exercised, which options are subject to the borrower meeting certain conditions.
The table below represents our loan activities during 2022 and 2023:
| Principal Balance | Deferred Fees and Other Items | Amortized Cost | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at December 31, 2021 | $590,590 | $(19,810) | $570,780 |
| Additional funding | 17,310 | — | 17,310 |
| Originations | 203,244 | (2,306) | 200,938 |
| Repayments | (132,589) | (979) | (133,568) |
| Net amortization of deferred fees | — | 3,780 | 3,780 |
| Purchase discount accretion | — | 10,689 | 10,689 |
| Balance at December 31, 2022 | 678,555 | (8,626) | 669,929 |
| Additional funding | 5,650 | (14) | 5,636 |
| Originations | 133,300 | (1,621) | 131,679 |
| Repayments | (171,748) | (535) | (172,283) |
| Transfer to real estate owned | (15,865) | (95) | (15,960) |
| Net amortization of deferred fees | — | 3,333 | 3,333 |
| Purchase discount accretion | — | 4,128 | 4,128 |
| Balance at December 31, 2023 | $629,892 | $(3,430) | $626,462 |
The tables below detail the property type and geographic location of the properties securing the loans in our portfolio as of December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022:
| As of December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | |||||
| Property Type | Number of Loans | Amortized Cost | Percentage of Value | Number of Loans | Amortized Cost | Percentage of Value |
| Multifamily | 7 | $207,734 | 33% | 8 | $197,229 | 29% |
| Office (1) | 7 | 181,268 | 29% | 11 | 252,796 | 38% |
| Industrial (1) | 5 | 118,707 | 19% | 4 | 110,656 | 17% |
| Retail | 3 | 72,962 | 12% | 4 | 109,248 | 16% |
| Hotel | 2 | 45,791 | 7% | — | — | —% |
| 24 | $626,462 | 100% | 27 | $669,929 | 100% | |
(1) As of December 31, 2022, one loan investment secured by a mixed use property consisting of office space and an industrial warehouse in Aurora, IL was classified as office for the purpose of counting the number of loans in our portfolio because the majority of the square footage of the property consisted of office space. The amortized cost of this loan investment was reflected in office and industrial based on the fair value of the building at the time of origination relative to the total fair value of the property. During the year ended December 31, 2023, our loan investment in Aurora, IL was repaid.
| As of December 31, | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | |||||
| Geographic Location | Number of Loans | Amortized Cost | Percentage of Value | Number of Loans | Amortized Cost | Percentage of Value |
| South | 8 | $222,477 | 36% | 6 | $166,616 | 25% |
| West | 9 | 185,294 | 30% | 8 | 146,837 | 22% |
| Midwest | 4 | 128,876 | 20% | 9 | 251,208 | 37% |
| East | 3 | 89,815 | 14% | 4 | 105,268 | 16% |
| 24 | $626,462 | 100% | 27 | $669,929 | 100% | |
Credit Quality Information
We evaluate the credit quality of each of our loans at least quarterly by assessing a variety of risk factors in relation to each loan and assigning a risk rating to each loan based on those factors. The higher the number, the greater the risk level.
As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the amortized cost of our loan portfolio within each internal risk rating by year of origination was as follows:
| December 31, 2023 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk Rating | Number of Loans | Percentage of Portfolio | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | Prior | Total |
| 1 | — | —% | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— |
| 2 | 3 | 15% | 37,323 | 42,089 | 15,435 | — | 94,847 |
| 3 | 18 | 71% | 94,881 | 167,491 | 144,456 | 38,548 | 445,376 |
| 4 | 3 | 14% | — | — | 86,239 | — | 86,239 |
| 5 | — | —% | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 100% | $132,204 | $209,580 | $246,130 | $38,548 | $626,462 | |
| December 31, 2022 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Risk Rating | Number of Loans | Percentage of Portfolio | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | Prior | Total |
| 1 | 1 | 1% | $— | $— | $9,708 | $— | $9,708 |
| 2 | 6 | 20% | — | 65,902 | 68,740 | — | 134,642 |
| 3 | 17 | 65% | 169,516 | 235,602 | — | 28,998 | 434,116 |
| 4 | 3 | 14% | 36,506 | 39,314 | — | 15,643 | 91,463 |
| 5 | — | —% | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 100% | $206,022 | $340,818 | $78,448 | $44,641 | $669,929 | |
The borrower of our loan secured by an office property located in Yardley, PA did not pay its debt service obligations due in May 2023, resulting in an event of default. In June 2023, we assumed legal title to the property through a deed in lieu of foreclosure. See Note 4 for further information.
The table below present the change to the allowance for credit losses during the year ended December 31, 2023:
| Loans Held for Investment, net | Unfunded Loan Commitments | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balance at December 31, 2022 | $— | $— | $— |
| Cumulative-effect adjustment upon adoption of ASU No. 2016-13 | 4,893 | 1,702 | 6,595 |
| Reversal of credit losses | (549) | (250) | (799) |
| Write offs (1) | (708) | — | (708) |
| Recoveries | 740 | — | 740 |
| Balance at December 31, 2023 | $4,376 | $1,452 | $5,828 |
(1) Write offs for the year ended December 31, 2023 relate to our loan secured by an office property located in Yardley, PA that was originated in 2019. We assumed legal title to the property through a deed in lieu of foreclosure in June 2023. See Note 4 for further information.
We estimate credit losses over a reasonable and supportable forecast period of 12 months, followed by a straight-line reversion period of 12 months back to average historical losses. The decrease in the allowance for credit losses during the year ended December 31, 2023 compared to the January 1, 2023 cumulative-effect adjustment upon adoption of ASU No. 2016-13, is primarily attributable to a recovery in our previously recorded allowance for credit losses related to the loan transferred to real estate owned in June 2023, partially offset by unfavorable changes in CRE pricing forecasts.
We may enter into loan modifications that include among other changes, extensions of maturity dates, repurposing or required replenishment of reserves, increases or decreases in loan commitments and required pay downs of principal amounts outstanding. Loan modifications are evaluated to determine whether a modification results in a new loan or a continuation of an existing loan under ASC 310.
In June 2023, we amended the agreement governing our loan secured by an office property in St. Louis, MO. As part of this amendment, the borrower repaid $5,000 of the outstanding principal amount and the maturity date was extended bysix months to December 19, 2023. We accounted for the amendment as a modification to the existing loan because the changes to the terms were determined to be minor. In October 2023, the borrower repaid the full outstanding principal amount on this loan.
In August 2023, we amended the agreement governing our loan secured by an office property in Dublin, OH. As part of this amendment, the borrower repaid $2,000 of the outstanding principal amount and the maturity date was extended byone year to August 16, 2024. We accounted for the amendment as a modification to the existing loan because the changes to the terms were determined to be minor. In October 2023, the borrower repaid the full outstanding principal amount on this loan.
There were no other modifications to our loan portfolio for borrowers experiencing financial difficulties during the year ended December 31, 2023.
We have elected to exclude accrued interest receivable from amortized cost and not to measure an allowance for credit losses on accrued interest receivable. Accrued interest receivables are generally written off when payments are 120 days past due. Such amounts are reversed against interest income and no further interest will be recorded until it is collected. During the year ended December 31, 2023, we reversed $88 of accrued interest related to the loan transferred to real estate owned in June 2023.
We did not have any outstanding past due loans or nonaccrual loans as of December 31, 2023 or 2022. As of December 31, 2023 and February 15, 2024, our borrowers with outstanding loans had paid their debt service obligations owed and due to us.
Note 4. Real Estate Owned
In June 2023, we assumed legal title to an office property located in Yardley, PA through a deed in lieu of foreclosure. As of June 30, 2023, the property met the held for sale criteria required by ASC 360 and was classified as held for sale. The amortized cost basis of $15,960 of the related loan exceeded the fair value of the property, including cash assumed of $1,742 and net liabilities assumed of $550, less estimated costs to sell of $740, by $708. The previously established allowance for credit losses for the related loan was $1,335, resulting in a decrease to our provision for credit losses of $627 recorded in our consolidated statements of operations during the six months ended June 30, 2023. Upon assumption of legal title of the property, we also assumed $2,258 of outstanding commitments for lease related costs pursuant to previously executed tenant leases.
As of September 30, 2023, although there was not a change to the plan of sale, the property did not meet the held for sale criteria required by ASC 360 and was classified as held for investment. As a result, we recorded a reversal of credit losses of $740 for estimated costs to sell in our consolidated statements of operations during the three months ended September 30, 2023. We accounted for the acquisition as an asset acquisition and allocated the fair value of the assumed assets and liabilities on the acquisition date as follows:
| Acquisition Date | Fair Value | Land | Buildings and Improvements | Acquired Real Estate Leases |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 2023 | $14,800 | $2,880 | $7,325 | $4,595 |
Other assets related to real estate owned of $1,352, including $647 of straight line rent receivables, are included in prepaid expenses and other assets, net, in our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2023. Accrued expenses and other liabilities related to real estate owned of $517 are included in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2023. There were no other assets or accrued expenses and other liabilities related to real estate owned at December 31, 2022. We increased revenue from real estate owned to record revenue on a straight line basis by $647 for the year ended December 31, 2023. Expenses from real estate owned represents costs related to the acquisition of the property, costs to operate the property and depreciation and amortization expense.
The following operating lease maturity analysis presents the future contractual lease payments to be received by us through 2034 as of December 31, 2023:
| Year | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2024 | $1,743 |
| 2025 | 1,925 |
| 2026 | 1,824 |
| 2027 | 1,892 |
| 2028 | 1,868 |
| Thereafter | 5,957 |
| Total | $15,209 |
Note 5. Secured Financing Agreements
UBS Master Repurchase Facility
We are a party to a master repurchase agreement with UBS AG, or UBS, or our UBS Master Repurchase Agreement, for a facility, or our UBS Master Repurchase Facility, pursuant to which we may sell to UBS, and later repurchase, commercial mortgage loans, which are referred to as purchased assets. In July 2023, we amended and restated our master repurchase agreement with UBS, or the UBS Master Repurchase Agreement. The amended and restated UBS Master Repurchase Agreement made certain changes to the agreement and related fee letter, including extending the stated maturity date to February 18, 2025. In August 2023, we amended the related fee letter to increase the maximum amount of available advancements under the UBS Master Repurchase Facility to $205,000. Pursuant to the UBS Master Repurchase Agreement, we will pay UBS a non-refundable upfront fee that is equal to 0.50% of the applicable tranche amount on each Purchase Date (as each term is defined in the UBS Master Repurchase Agreement).
Under our UBS Master Repurchase Facility, the initial purchase price paid by UBS for each purchased asset is up to 75% of the lesser of the market value of the purchased asset and the unpaid principal balance of such purchased asset, subject to UBS’s approval. Upon the repurchase of a purchased asset, we are required to pay UBS the outstanding purchase price of the purchased asset, accrued interest and all accrued and unpaid expenses of UBS relating to such purchased assets. The pricing rate (or interest rate) relating to a purchased asset was equal to the one month Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR plus a premium within a fixed range, determined by the debt yield and property type of the purchased asset’s real estate collateral. UBS has the discretion under our UBS Master Repurchase Agreement to make advancements at margins higher than 75%.
In connection with our UBS Master Repurchase Agreement, we entered into a guaranty, or the UBS Guaranty, which requires us to guarantee 25% of the aggregate repurchase price, and 100% of losses in the event of certain bad acts as well as any costs and expenses of UBS related to our UBS Master Repurchase Agreement. The UBS Guaranty also contains financial covenants, which require us to maintain a minimum tangible net worth, a minimum liquidity and to satisfy a total indebtedness to stockholders' equity ratio.
Our UBS Master Repurchase Facility also contains margin maintenance provisions that provide UBS with the right, in certain circumstances related to a credit event, as defined in the UBS Master Repurchase Agreement, to redetermine the value of purchased assets. Where a decline in the value of such purchased assets has resulted in a margin deficit, UBS may require us to eliminate any margin deficit through a combination of purchased asset repurchases and cash transfers to UBS subject to UBS’s approval.
Citibank Master Repurchase Facility
We are a party to a master repurchase agreement with Citibank NA, or Citibank, or our Citibank Master Repurchase Agreement, for a facility, or our Citibank Master Repurchase Facility, pursuant to which we may sell to Citibank, and later repurchase, commercial mortgage loans, which are referred to as purchased assets. The maximum amount of available advancements under our Citibank Master Repurchase Facility is $215,000 and the stated maturity date is March 15, 2025, subject to earlier termination as provided for in the Citibank Master Repurchase Agreement. Pursuant to the Citibank Master Repurchase Agreement, we may sell to Citibank, and later repurchase, floating rate mortgage loans and other related assets.
Under our Citibank Master Repurchase Agreement, the initial purchase price paid by Citibank for each purchased asset is up to 75% of the lesser of the market value of the purchased asset or the unpaid principal balance of such purchased asset, subject to Citibank’s approval. Upon the repurchase of a purchased asset, we are required to pay Citibank the outstanding purchase price of the purchased asset, accrued interest and all accrued and unpaid expenses of Citibank relating to such purchased asset. The price differential (or interest rate) relating to a purchased asset was equal to SOFR plus a premium of 200 to 250 basis points, determined by the yield of the purchased asset and the property type of the purchased asset’s real estate collateral. Citibank has the discretion under our Citibank Master Repurchase Agreement to make advancements at margins higher than 75% and at premiums of less than 200 basis points.
In connection with our Citibank Master Repurchase Agreement, we entered into a guaranty, or the Citibank Guaranty, which requires us to guarantee 25% of our subsidiary's prompt and complete payment of the purchase price, purchase price differential and any costs and expenses of Citibank related to our Citibank Master Repurchase Agreement. The Citibank Guaranty also contains financial covenants, which require us to maintain a minimum tangible net worth, a minimum liquidity, a minimum interest coverage ratio and to satisfy a total indebtedness to tangible net worth ratio. These maintenance provisions provide Citibank with the right, in certain circumstances related to a credit event, as defined in our Citibank Master Repurchase Agreement, to re-determine the value of purchased assets. Where a decline in the value of such purchased assets has resulted in a margin deficit, Citibank may require us to eliminate any margin deficit through a combination of purchased asset repurchases and cash transfers to Citibank, subject to Citibank's approval.
BMO Facility
We are a party to a facility loan program agreement and the security agreement with BMO Harris Bank N.A., or BMO, orour BMO Loan Program Agreement, with BMO as administrative agent for the lenders. Amounts advanced under an uncommitted credit facility, up to the maximum principal amount of $150,000, or the BMO Facility, may be used to fund new mortgage loan originations and/or fund future funding obligations under existing and new mortgage loans pursuant to separate agreements, or the BMO Facility Loan Agreements. BMO Facility Loan Agreements issued under the BMO Facility are coterminous with the pledged mortgage loan investments, are not subject to margin calls and allow for up to an 80% advance rate, subject to certain loan to cost and LTV limits. Interest on advancements under the BMO Facility are calculated at SOFR plus a premium. BMO Facility Loan Agreements issued under our BMO Facility are secured by a security interest and collateral assignment of the underlying loans to our borrowers which are secured by real property owned by such borrowers.
In connection with our BMO Loan Program Agreement, we guaranteed certain of the obligations under our BMO Loan Program Agreement and the BMO Facility Loan Agreements pursuant to a limited guaranty from us to and for the benefit of the administrative agent for itself and such other lenders. Specifically, the BMO Guaranty requires us to guarantee 25% of the then current outstanding principal balance of the facility loans and 100% of losses or the entire indebtedness in the event of certain bad acts as well as any costs and expenses of the administrative agent or lenders related to our BMO Loan Program Agreement. In addition, the BMO Guaranty contains financial covenants that require us to maintain a minimum tangible net worth and a minimum liquidity and to satisfy a total indebtedness to stockholders’ equity ratio.
Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Facility
We are a party to a master repurchase and securities agreement with Wells Fargo, National Association, or Wells Fargo, or the Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Agreement, for the Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Facility. The Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Facility provides up to $125,000 in advances, with an option to increase the maximum facility amount to $250,000, subject to certain terms and conditions. We may sell to Wells Fargo, and later repurchase, commercial mortgage loans, which are referred to as purchased assets. The expiration date of the Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Agreement is March 11, 2025, unless extended or earlier terminated in accordance with the terms of the Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Agreement.
Under the Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Facility, the initial purchase price paid by Wells Fargo for each purchased asset is up to 75% or 80%, depending on the property type of the purchased asset’s real estate collateral, of the lesser of the market value of the purchased asset or the unpaid principal balance of such purchased asset, and subject to Wells Fargo’s approval. Upon the repurchase of a purchased asset, we are required to pay Wells Fargo the outstanding purchase price of the purchased asset, accrued interest and all accrued and unpaid expenses of Wells Fargo relating to such purchased asset. Interest on advancements under the Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Facility is calculated at SOFR, plus a premium.
In connection with our Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Agreement, we entered into a guaranty, or the Wells Fargo Guaranty, which requires us to guarantee 25% of the aggregate repurchase price, and 100% of losses in the event of certain bad acts as well as any costs and expenses of Wells Fargo related to our Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Agreement. The Wells Fargo Guaranty also contains financial covenants, which require us to maintain a minimum tangible net worth, a minimum liquidity and a minimum interest coverage ratio and to satisfy a total indebtedness to stockholders’ equity ratio.
Our Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Facility also contains margin maintenance provisions that provide Wells Fargo with the right, in certain circumstances related to a credit event, as defined in the Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Agreement, to redetermine the value of purchased assets. Where a decline in the value of such purchased assets has resulted in a margin deficit, Wells Fargo may require us to eliminate any margin deficit through a combination of purchased asset repurchases and cash transfers to Wells Fargo subject to Wells Fargo’s approval.
We refer to the UBS Master Repurchase Facility, Citibank Master Repurchase Facility, BMO Facility and Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Facility, collectively, as our Secured Financing Facilities. We refer to the UBS Master Repurchase Agreement, Citibank Master Repurchase Agreement and Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Agreement, collectively, as our Master Repurchase Agreements, and to our Master Repurchase Agreements, the BMO Loan Program Agreement and the BMO Facility Loan Agreements, collectively, as our Secured Financing Agreements.
As of December 31, 2023, we were in compliance with the covenants and other terms of the agreements that govern our Secured Financing Facilities.
The table below summarizes our Secured Financing Facilities as of December 31, 2023 and 2022:
| Debt Obligation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weighted Average · Collateral | ||||||
| Maximum Facility Size | Principal Balance | Carrying Value | Coupon Rate (1) | Remaining Maturity (years) (2) | Principal Balance | |
| December 31, 2023: | ||||||
| Citibank Master Repurchase Facility | $215,000 | $91,115 | $90,811 | 7.47% | 0.7 | $142,465 |
| UBS Master Repurchase Facility | 205,000 | 181,381 | 181,162 | 7.72% | 0.8 | 241,887 |
| BMO Facility | 150,000 | 87,767 | 87,451 | 7.29% | 1.3 | 118,471 |
| Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Facility | 125,000 | 95,551 | 94,998 | 7.44% | 1.1 | 127,069 |
| Total/weighted average | $695,000 | $455,814 | $454,422 | 7.53% | 0.9 | $629,892 |
| Citibank Master Repurchase Facility | $215,000 | $150,647 | $150,360 | 6.34% | 1.1 | $205,234 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBS Master Repurchase Facility | 192,000 | 144,437 | 143,887 | 6.48% | 1.1 | 198,254 |
| BMO Facility | 150,000 | 111,105 | 110,473 | 6.22% | 2.2 | 148,476 |
| Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Facility | 125,000 | 67,426 | 66,801 | 6.23% | 2.1 | 89,008 |
| Total/weighted average | $682,000 | $473,615 | $471,521 | 6.34% | 1.5 | $640,972 |
(1)The weighted average coupon rate is determined using SOFR plus a spread ranging from 1.83% to 2.90%, as applicable, for the respective borrowings under our Secured Financing Facilities as of the applicable date.
(2)The weighted average remaining maturity of our Master Repurchase Facilities is determined using the earlier of the underlying loan investment maturity date and the respective repurchase agreement maturity date. As of December 31, 2023, our Citibank Master Repurchase Facility, UBS Master Repurchase Facility and Wells Fargo Master Repurchase Facility mature on March 15, 2025, February 18, 2025 and March 11, 2025, respectively. Our BMO Facility matures at various dates based on the respective underlying loans held for investment.
As of December 31, 2023, our outstanding borrowings under our Secured Financing Facilities had the following remaining maturities:
| Maturity Year | Principal Payments Due Upon Maturity |
|---|---|
| 2024 | $223,745 |
| 2025 | 232,069 |
| 2026 and thereafter | — |
| $455,814 |
Note 6. Fair Value Measurements
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable approximate their fair values due to the short term nature of these financial instruments.
We estimate the fair values of our loans held for investment and outstanding principal balances under our Secured Financing Facilities by using Level III inputs, including discounted cash flow analyses and currently prevailing market terms as of the measurement date.
The table below provides information regarding our financial assets and liabilities not carried at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets:
| As of December 31, | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | |||
| Carrying Value | Fair Value | Carrying Value | Fair Value | |
| Financial assets | ||||
| Loans held for investment | $622,086 | $626,079 | $669,929 | $679,911 |
| Financial liabilities | ||||
| Secured Financing Facilities | $454,422 | $454,620 | $471,521 | $471,362 |
There were no transfers of financial assets or liabilities within the fair value hierarchy during the years ended December 31, 2023 or 2022.
Note 7. Shareholders' Equity
Common Share Awards
We have common shares available for issuance under the terms of our Amended and Restated 2021 Equity Compensation Plan, or the 2021 Plan. During the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we awarded to our officers and certain other employees of Tremont and of RMR annual share awards of 80,000 and 85,000 of our common shares, respectively, valued at $876 and $859, in aggregate, respectively. In accordance with our Trustee compensation arrangements, during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we awarded each of our then Trustees 6,000 of our common shares valued at $387 and $448, respectively, as part of their annual compensation. The values of the share awards are based upon the closing price of our common shares on The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, or Nasdaq, on the dates of awards. The common shares that we award to our Trustees as trustee compensation vest immediately. The common shares we award to our officers and certain other employees of Tremont and of RMR vest infive equal annual installments beginning on the date of award. We recognize any share forfeitures as they occur. We include the value of awarded shares in general and administrative expenses ratably over the vesting period.
A summary of shares granted, forfeited, vested and unvested under the terms of the 2021 Plan for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 is as follows:
| 2023 | 2022 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number ofShares | Weighted Average GrantDate Fair Value | Number ofShares | Weighted Average GrantDate Fair Value | |
| Unvested shares, beginning of year | 129,680 | $10.24 | 91,584 | $10.39 |
| Shares granted | 122,000 | $10.35 | 127,000 | $10.29 |
| Shares forfeited | (2,334) | $10.19 | (1,016) | $10.39 |
| Shares vested | (112,925) | $9.96 | (87,888) | $10.45 |
| Unvested shares, end of year | 136,421 | $10.57 | 129,680 | $10.24 |
The 136,421 unvested shares as of December 31, 2023 are scheduled to vest as follows:46,722 shares in 2024,43,300 shares in 2025,30,400 shares in 2026 and 15,999 shares in 2027.
As of December 31, 2023, the estimated future compensation expense for the unvested shares was $1,303. The weighted average period over which the compensation expense will be recorded is approximately 22 months. During the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we recorded $1,121 and $1,018, respectively, of compensation expense related to the 2021 Plan. At December 31, 2023,148,829 of our common shares remained available for issuance under the 2021 Plan.
Common Share Purchases
During the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we purchased 17,421 and 13,898 of our common shares, respectively, from certain of our current and former officers and current and former officers and employees of Tremont and/or RMR in satisfaction of tax withholding and payment obligations in connection with the vesting of awards of our common shares, valued at the closing price of our common shares on Nasdaq on the applicable purchase date. The aggregate value of common shares purchased during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 was $183 and $137, respectively.
Distributions
During the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we declared and paid regular quarterly distributions to common shareholders, using cash on hand, as follows:
| Characterization of Distributions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | Annual Per Share Distribution | Total Distribution | Return of Capital | Ordinary Income | Qualified Dividend |
| 2023 | $1.40 | $20,639 | —% | 100% | —% |
| 2022 | $1.00 | $14,636 | —% | 100% | —% |
On January 11, 2024, we declared a quarterly distribution of $0.35 per common share, or $5,184, to shareholders of record on January 22, 2024, and we paid this distribution on February 15, 2024 using cash on hand.
Note 8. Management Agreement with Tremont
We haveno employees. The personnel and various services we require to operate our business are provided to us, pursuant to a management agreement with Tremont, which provides for the day to day management of our operations by Tremont, subject to the oversight and direction of our Board of Trustees.
Our management agreement with Tremont provides for an annual base management fee and an incentive fee, payable in cash, among other terms:
Base Management Fee. We are required to pay Tremont the annual base management fee equal to 1.5% of our “Equity”, payable in cash quarterly (0.375% per quarter) in arrears. Under our management agreement, “Equity” means (a) the sum of (i) our net asset value as of January 5, 2021, plus (ii) the net proceeds received by us from any future sale or issuance of shares of beneficial interest, plus (iii) our cumulative “Core Earnings,” as defined below, for the period commencing on January 5, 2021 to the end of the applicable most recent completed calendar quarter, less (b) (i) any distributions previously paid to holders of our common shares, (ii) any incentive fee previously paid to Tremont and (iii) any amount that we may have paid to repurchase our common shares. All items in the foregoing sentence (other than clause (a)(iii)) are calculated on a daily weighted average basis. As a result of our merger with Tremont Mortgage Trust, or TRMT, in 2021, or the Merger, as of September 30, 2021, the net book value of TRMT was included as “Equity” under the management agreement.
Incentive Fee. We are required to pay Tremont quarterly an incentive fee in arrears in cash equal to the difference between:
The product of (i)20% and (ii) the difference between (A) our Core Earnings for the most recent 12 month period (or such lesser number of completed calendar quarters, if applicable), including the calendar quarter (or part thereof) for which the calculation of the incentive fee is being made, and (B) the product of (1) our Equity in the most recent 12 month period (or such lesser number of completed calendar quarters, if applicable), including the calendar quarter (or part thereof) for which the calculation of the incentive fee is being made, and (2)7% per year, and
The sum of any incentive fees paid to Tremont with respect to the first three calendar quarters of the most recent 12 month period (or such lesser number of completed calendar quarters, if applicable).
No incentive fee shall be payable with respect to any calendar quarter unless Core Earnings for the 12 most recently completed calendar quarters (or such lesser number of completed calendar quarters, if applicable) in the aggregate is greater than zero. Pursuant to the terms of our management agreement, any management incentive fees are subject to Tremont earning those fees in accordance with the management agreement.
For purposes of the calculation of base management fees and incentive fees payable to Tremont under our management agreement, “Core Earnings” is defined as net income (or loss) attributable to our common shareholders, computed in accordance with GAAP, including realized losses not otherwise included in GAAP net income (loss), and excluding: (a) the incentive fees earned by Tremont, (b) depreciation and amortization of real estate owned and related intangible assets (if any); (c) non-cash equity compensation expense (if any); (d) unrealized gains, losses and other similar non-cash items that are included in net income for the period of the calculation (regardless of whether such items are included in or deducted from net income or in other comprehensive income or loss under GAAP); and (e) one-time events pursuant to changes in GAAP and certain material non-cash income or expense items, in each case after discussion between Tremont and our Independent Trustees and approved by a majority of our Independent Trustees. Core Earnings are reduced for realized losses on loan investments when amounts are deemed uncollectable. Pursuant to the terms of our management agreement, the exclusion of depreciation and amortization from the calculation of Core Earnings shall only apply with respect to real property we own.
Our shares of beneficial interest that are entitled to a specific periodic distribution or have other debt characteristics will not be included in “Equity” for the purpose of calculating incentive fees payable to Tremont. Instead, the aggregate distribution amount that accrues to such shares during the calendar quarter of such calculation will be subtracted from Core Earnings for purposes of calculating incentive fees, unless such distribution is otherwise already excluded from Core Earnings. Equity and Core Earnings as defined in our management agreement are non-GAAP financial measures and may be different from our shareholders’ equity and our net income calculated according to GAAP.
Term. The initial term of our management agreement ended on December 31, 2023, and the agreement automatically renewed for a successive one year term on January 1, 2024, and will renew for successiveone year terms each January 1 thereafter, unless it is sooner terminated as detailed below.
Termination Rights. We have the right to terminate our management agreement with Tremont upon written notice delivered no later than 180 days prior to a renewal date by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of our Independent Trustees based upon a determination that: (a) Tremont’s performance is unsatisfactory and materially detrimental to us or (b) the base management fee and incentive fee, taken as a whole, payable to Tremont under our management agreement are not fair to us (provided that, in the instance of (b), Tremont will be afforded the opportunity to renegotiate the base management fee and incentive fee prior to termination). Our management agreement may be terminated by Tremont before each annual renewal upon written notice delivered to our Board of Trustees no later than 180 days prior to an annual renewal date. We may also terminate our management agreement at any time without the payment of any termination fee, with at least 30 days’ prior written notice from us upon the occurrence of a “cause event,” as defined in the management agreement. Tremont may terminate our management agreement in certain other circumstances, including if we become required to register as an investment company under the 1940 Act for our uncured “material breach,” as defined in our management agreement, we materially reduce Tremont’s duties and responsibilities or scope of its authority under our management agreement or we cease or take steps to cease to conduct the business of originating or investing in CRE loans.
Termination Fee. In the event our management agreement is terminated by us without a cause event or by Tremont for a material breach, we will be required to pay Tremont a termination fee equal to: (a)three times the sum of (i) the average annual base management fee and (ii) the average annual incentive fee, in each case paid or payable to Tremont during the 24 month period immediately preceding the most recently completed calendar quarter prior to the date of termination plus (b) $1,600. No termination fee will be payable if our management agreement is terminated by us for a cause event or by Tremont without our material breach. In addition, as described above, in connection with the Merger and the termination of TRMT’s management agreement with Tremont, the initial organizational costs related to TRMT’s formation and the costs of its initial public offering and the concurrent private placement that Tremont had paid pursuant to that management agreement of $6,680 will be included in the “Termination Fee” under and as defined in our management agreement with Tremont.
Expense Reimbursement. Tremont, and not us, is responsible for the costs of its employees who provide services to us, including the cost of Tremont’s personnel who originate our loans, unless any such payment or reimbursement is specifically approved by a majority of our Independent Trustees, is a shared services cost or relates to awards made under any equity compensation plan adopted by us. Generally, it is the practice of Tremont and RMR to treat individuals who spend 50% or more of their business time providing services to Tremont as employees of Tremont. We are required to pay or to reimburse Tremont and its affiliates for all other costs and expenses of our operations, including but not limited to, the cost of rent, utilities, office furniture, equipment, machinery and other overhead type expenses, the costs of legal, accounting, auditing, tax planning and tax return preparation, consulting services, diligence costs related to our investments, investor relations expenses and other professional services, and other costs and expenses not specifically required under our management agreement to be borne by Tremont. Some of these overhead, professional and other services are provided by RMR pursuant to a shared services agreement between Tremont and RMR. We reimburse Tremont for shared services costs Tremont pays to RMR and its affiliates, and these reimbursements include an allocation of the cost of applicable personnel employed by RMR and our share of RMR’s costs of providing our internal audit function, with such shared services costs being subject to approval by a majority of our Independent Trustees at least annually.
Business Opportunities. Under our management agreement, we and Tremont have agreed that for so long as Tremont is managing us, neither Tremont nor any of its affiliates, including RMR, will sponsor or manage any other publicly traded REIT that invests primarily in first mortgage loans secured by middle market and transitional CRE located in the United States, unless such activity is approved by our Independent Trustees. However, our management agreement does not prohibit Tremont or its affiliates (including RMR) or their respective directors, trustees, officers, employees or agents from competing or providing services to other persons, funds and investment vehicles, private REITs or other entities that may compete with us, including, among other things, with respect to the origination, acquisition, making, arranging or managing of first mortgage loans secured by middle market or transitional CRE or other investments like those we intend to make.
Because Tremont and RMR will not be prohibited from competing with us in all circumstances, and RMR provides management services to other companies, conflicts of interest exist with regard to the allocation of investment opportunities and for the time and attention of Tremont, RMR and their personnel. Our management agreement acknowledges these conflicts of interest and, in that agreement, we agree that Tremont, RMR and their subsidiaries may resolve such conflicts in good faith in their fair and reasonable discretion. In the case of such a conflict, Tremont, RMR and their subsidiaries will endeavor to allocate such investment opportunities in a fair and reasonable manner, taking into account such factors as they deem appropriate.
Our management agreement also provides that if Tremont, its affiliates (including RMR) or any of their respective directors, trustees, officers, employees or agents acquires knowledge of a potential business opportunity, we renounce any potential interest or expectation in, or right to be offered or to participate in, such business opportunity to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law.
Liability and Indemnification. Tremont maintains a contractual as opposed to a fiduciary relationship with us. Pursuant to our management agreement, Tremont does not assume any responsibility other than to render the services called for thereunder in good faith and is not responsible for any action of our Board of Trustees in following or declining to follow its advice or recommendations. Under the terms of our management agreement, Tremont and its affiliates, including RMR, and their respective directors, trustees, officers, shareholders, owners, members, managers, employees and personnel will not be liable to us or any of our Trustees, shareholders or subsidiaries, or any of the trustees, directors or shareholders of any of our subsidiaries, for any acts or omissions related to the provision of services to us under our management agreement, except by reason of acts or omissions that have been determined in a final, non-appealable adjudication to have constituted bad faith, fraud, intentional misconduct, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties of Tremont under our management agreement. In addition, under the terms of our management agreement, we agree to indemnify, hold harmless and advance expenses to Tremont and its affiliates, including RMR, and their respective directors, trustees, officers, shareholders, owners, members, managers, employees and personnel from and against any and all expenses, losses, damages, liabilities, demands, charges and claims of any nature whatsoever, including all reasonable attorneys’, accountants’ and experts’ fees and expenses, arising from any acts or omissions related to the provision of services to us or the performance of any matters pursuant to an instruction by our Board of Trustees, except to the extent there is a final, non-appealable adjudication that such acts or omissions constituted bad faith, fraud, intentional misconduct, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties of Tremont under our management agreement. Such persons will also not be liable for trade errors that may result from ordinary negligence, including errors in the investment decision making or trade process.
Note 9. Related Person Transactions
We have relationships and historical and continuing transactions with Tremont, RMR, The RMR Group Inc., or RMR Inc., and others related to them, including other companies to which RMR or its subsidiaries provide management services and some of which have trustees, directors or officers who are also our Trustees or officers. Tremont is a subsidiary of RMR, which is a majority owned subsidiary of RMR Inc., and RMR Inc. is the managing member of RMR. RMR provides certain shared services to Tremont that are applicable to us, and we reimburse Tremont or pay RMR for the amounts Tremont or RMR pays for those services. One of our Managing Trustees and Chair of our Board of Trustees, Adam D. Portnoy, is the sole trustee, an officer and the controlling shareholder of ABP Trust, which is the controlling shareholder of RMR Inc., and he is also a director of Tremont, the chair of the board of directors, a managing director and the president and chief executive officer of RMR Inc., and an officer and employee of RMR. Matthew P. Jordan, our other Managing Trustee, is a director and the president and chief executive officer of Tremont. Mr. Jordan is also an officer of RMR Inc. and an officer and employee of RMR, and our other officers are officers and employees of Tremont and/or RMR.
Our Independent Trustees also serve as independent trustees of other public companies to which RMR or its subsidiaries provide management services. Adam D. Portnoy serves as the chair of the board and as a managing trustee of those companies and other officers of RMR, including Mr. Jordan and certain of our other officers and officers of Tremont, serve as managing trustees or officers of certain of these companies.
Our Manager, Tremont Realty Capital LLC. Tremont provides management services to us pursuant to our management agreement. See Note 8 for further information regarding our management agreement. On May 11, 2022, Tremont purchased 882,407 of our common shares from Diane Portnoy, the mother of Adam D. Portnoy. Tremont paid an aggregate purchase price of $9,469 for these shares. As of December 31, 2023, Tremont owned 1,708,058 of our common shares, or approximately 11.5% of our outstanding common shares, and Mr. Portnoy beneficially owned (including through Tremont and ABP Trust)13.5% of our outstanding common shares.
RMR Inc. and RMR. RMR provides certain shared services to Tremont which are applicable to us, and we reimburse Tremont or pay RMR for the amounts Tremont or RMR pays for those services. See Note 8 for further information regarding this shared services arrangement.
Share Awards to our Officers and Employees of Tremont and RMR. As described further in Note 7, we award shares to our officers and other employees of Tremont and/or RMR annually. Generally, one fifth of these awards vests on the award date and one fifth vests on each of the next four anniversaries of the award dates. These awards to employees of Tremont and RMR are in addition to the share awards to our Managing Trustees, as Trustee compensation, and the fees we paid to Tremont. We purchased common shares awarded to certain of our officers and employees of Tremont and/or RMR in satisfaction of tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of awards of our common shares. See Note 7 for further information regarding these purchases.
Acceleration of Unvested Shares of a Former Officer. G. Douglas Lanois resigned as our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, effective September 30, 2022. Our Compensation Committee approved the acceleration of all 3,648 of the unvested shares owned by Mr. Lanois of us as of his separation date, January 1, 2023.
Property Management Agreement with RMR. We entered into a property management agreement with RMR in July 2023 with respect to real estate owned in Yardley, PA. Pursuant to this agreement, RMR provides property management services and we pay management fees equal to 3.0% of gross collected rents. Also under the terms of this property management agreement, we pay RMR additional fees for construction supervision services equal to 5.0% of the cost of such construction. Either we or RMR may terminate this agreement upon 30 days' prior notice. No termination fee would be payable as a result of terminating the agreement. We recognized property management and construction supervision fees of $17 during the year ended December 31, 2023, related to real estate owned.
Note 10. Income Taxes
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Accordingly, we generally are not, and will not be, subject to U.S. federal income tax, provided that we meet certain distribution and other requirements. We are subject to certain state and local taxes, certain of which amounts are or will be reported as income taxes in our consolidated statements of operations.
Note 11. Weighted Average Common Shares
We calculate net income per common share - basic using the two class method. We calculate net income per common share - diluted using the more dilutive of the two class or treasury stock method. Unvested share awards are considered participating securities and the related impact on earnings are considered when calculating net income per common share - basic and net income per common share - diluted.
The calculation of net income per common share - basic and diluted is as follows (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
| Year Ended December 31, | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2022 | |
| Numerators: | ||
| Net income | $25,965 | $27,640 |
| Income attributable to unvested share awards | (219) | (193) |
| Net income used in calculating net income per common share - basic and diluted | $25,746 | $27,447 |
| Denominators: | ||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted | 14,625 | 14,540 |
| Net income per common share - basic and diluted | $1.76 | $1.89 |
Note 12. Commitments and Contingencies
As of December 31, 2023, we had unfunded loan commitments of $40,401 related to our loans held for investment that are not reflected in our consolidated balance sheets. These unfunded loan commitments had a weighted average initial maturity of 1.1 years as of December 31, 2023. See Note 3 for further information related to our loans held for investment.
As of December 31, 2023, we had estimated unspent lease related costs of $361.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.