Clipper Realty Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except for share and per share data)

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share data)

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(In thousands, except for share data)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(In thousands, except for share and per share data and as noted)

1. Organization

Clipper Realty Inc. (the “Company” or “We”) was organized in the state of Maryland on July 7, 2015. On August 3, 2015, we completed certain formation transactions and the sale of shares of common stock in a private offering. We contributed the net proceeds of the private offering to Clipper Realty L.P., our operating partnership subsidiary (the “Operating Partnership”), in exchange for units in the Operating Partnership. The Operating Partnership in turn contributed such net proceeds to the limited liability companies (“LLCs”) that comprised the predecessor of the Company in exchange for Class A LLC units in such LLCs and became the managing member of such LLCs. The owners of the LLCs exchanged their interests for Class B LLC units and an equal number of special, non-economic, voting stock in the Company. The Class B LLC units, together with the special voting shares, are convertible into common shares of the Company on a one-for-one basis and are entitled to distributions.

As of September 30, 2026, the properties owned by the Company consisted of the following (collectively, the “Properties”):

On May 30, 2025, the Company completed the sale of 10 West 65th Street in Manhattan, a 6-story residential building with approximately 76,000 square feet of residential rental GLA. for gross proceeds of $45,500. The Company incurred $1,900 in closing costs and paid $800 in accrued interest at closing. At closing, the Company repaid in full its $31,200 mortgage note (the “Mortgage”) with Flagstar Bank (“Flagstar”) (see note 4 below). The Company recorded a loss on impairment of long-lived assets of $33,780 during the three months ended March 31, 2025.

Square footage, leased occupancy percentage and rentable unit disclosures in the consolidated financial statements are unaudited.

The operations of Clipper Realty Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries are conducted primarily through the Operating Partnership. The Company has elected to be taxed as a Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”) under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). The Company is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and the Operating Partnership is the sole managing member of the LLCs that comprised the Predecessor.

For the three months ended September 30, 2026, and 2025, the Company’s interest, through the Operating Partnership, in the LLCs that own the properties generally entitles it to 38.0% and 38.0%, respectively, of the aggregate cash distributions from, and the profits and losses of, the LLCs.

The Company determined that the Operating Partnership and the LLCs are variable interest entities (“VIEs”) and that the Company was the primary beneficiary. The assets and liabilities of these VIEs represented substantially all of the Company’s assets and liabilities.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Segments

At September 30, 2026, and December 31, 2025, the Company hadtwo reportable operating segments, Residential Rental Properties and Commercial Rental Properties. Our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), represented by our Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, reviews the results in which the revenue and Income from Operations is divided between the commercial and residential performance.

Basis of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). The effect of all intercompany balances has been eliminated. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all entities in which the Company has a controlling interest. The ownership interests of other investors in these entities are recorded as non-controlling interests.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of commitments and contingencies at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management adjusts such estimates when facts and circumstances dictate. The most significant estimates made include the recoverability of accounts receivable, allocation of property purchase price to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, the useful lives of long-lived assets, review of long-lived assets for impairment and contingent liabilities. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates.

Investment in Real Estate

Real estate assets held for investment are carried at historical cost and consist of land, buildings and improvements, furniture, fixtures and equipment. Expenditures for ordinary repair and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for improvements, renovations, and replacements of real estate assets are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives if the expenditures qualify as betterments or the life of the related asset will be substantially extended beyond the original life expectancy.

In accordance with ASC 805, "Business Combinations” the Company evaluates each acquisition of real estate or in-substance real estate to determine if the integrated set of assets and activities acquired meets the definition of a business and needs to be accounted for as a business combination. If either of the following criteria is met, the integrated set of assets and activities acquired would not qualify as a business:

An acquired process is considered substantive if:

Generally, the Company expects that acquisitions of real estate or in-substance real estate will not meet the revised definition of a business because substantially all of the fair value is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets (i.e., land, buildings and related intangible assets) or because the acquisition does not include a substantive process in the form of an acquired workforce or an acquired contract that cannot be replaced without significant cost, effort or delay.

Upon acquisition of real estate, the Company assesses the fair values of acquired tangible and intangible assets including land, buildings, tenant improvements, above-market and below-market leases, in-place leases and any other identified intangible assets and assumed liabilities. The Company allocates the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in an asset acquisition based on their relative fair values. In estimating fair value of tangible and intangible assets acquired, the Company assesses and considers fair value based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount and capitalization rates, estimates of replacement costs, net of depreciation, and available market information. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.

The Company records acquired above-market and below-market lease values initially based on the present value, using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired based on the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed renewal options for the below-market leases. Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values and tenant relationship values (if any) that are based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and the Company’s overall relationship with the respective tenant. Factors to be considered by management in its analysis of in-place lease values include an estimate of carrying costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions. In estimating costs to execute similar leases, management considers leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses.

The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. A property’s value is impaired if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property. To the extent impairment has occurred, a write-down is recorded and measured by the amount of difference between the carrying value of the asset and the fair value of the asset. Management of the Company does not believe that any of its properties within the portfolio were impaired as of September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025. On May 30, 2025, the Company completed the sale of 10 West 65th Street in Manhattan, a 6-story residential building with approximately 76,000 square feet of residential rental GLA for gross proceeds of $45,500. The Company recorded a loss on impairment of long-lived assets of $33,780 in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2025, on 10 West 65 th Street, See Note 10.

For long-lived assets to be disposed of, impairment losses are recognized when the fair value of the assets less estimated cost to sell is less than the carrying value of the assets. Properties classified as real estate held-for-sale generally represent properties that are actively marketed or contracted for sale with closing expected to occur within the next twelve months. Real estate held-for-sale is carried at the lower of cost, net of accumulated depreciation, or fair value less cost to sell, determined on an asset-by-asset basis. Expenditures for ordinary repair and maintenance costs on held-for-sale properties are charged to expense as incurred. Expenditures for improvements, renovations and replacements related to held-for-sale properties are capitalized at cost. Depreciation is not recorded on real estate held-for-sale.

If a tenant vacates its space prior to the contractual termination of the lease and no rental payments are being made on the lease, any unamortized balances of the related intangibles are written off. The tenant improvements and origination costs are amortized to expense over the remaining life of the lease (or charged against earnings if the lease is terminated prior to its contractual expiration date).

Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction to base rental revenue over the remaining terms of the respective leases, and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below-market fixed rate renewal options of the respective leases. The value of in-place leases is amortized to expense over the remaining initial terms of the respective leases.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents are defined as cash on hand and in banks, plus all short-term investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. The Company maintains some of its cash in bank deposit accounts, which, at times, may exceed the federally insured limit. No losses have been experienced related to such accounts.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash generally consists of escrows for future real estate taxes and insurance expenditures, repairs, capital improvements, loan reserves and security deposits.

Tenant and Other Receivables and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Tenant and other receivables are comprised of amounts due for monthly rents and other charges less allowance for doubtful accounts. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC”) 842 "Leases,” the Company performed a detailed review of amounts due from tenants to determine if accounts receivable balances and future lease payments were probable of collection, wrote off receivables not probable of collection and recorded a general reserve against revenues for receivables probable of collection for which a loss can be reasonably estimated. If management determines that the tenant receivable is not probable of collection it is written off against revenues. In addition, the Company records a general reserve under ASC 450.

Deferred Costs

Deferred lease costs consist of fees incurred to initiate and renew operating leases. Lease costs are being amortized using the straight-line method over the terms of the respective leases.

Deferred financing costs represent commitment fees, legal and other third-party costs associated with obtaining financing. These costs are amortized over the term of the financing and are recorded in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations. Unamortized deferred financing costs are expensed when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity. Costs incurred in seeking financing transactions which do not close are expensed in the period the financing transaction is terminated.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised of net income (loss) adjusted for changes in unrealized gains and losses, reported in equity, for financial instruments required to be reported at fair value under GAAP. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026, and 2025, the Company did not own any financial instruments for which the change in value was not reported in net income (loss); accordingly, its comprehensive income (loss) was its net income (loss) as presented in the consolidated statements of operations.

Revenue Recognition

As mentioned above under Tenant and Other Receivables and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts the Company records lease income under ASC 842,“Leases” which replaces the guidance under ASC 840. ASC 842 applies to the Company principally as lessor; as a lessee, the Company’s leases are immaterial. The Company has determined that all its leases as lessor are operating leases. The Company has elected to not bifurcate lease and non-lease components under a practical expedient provision. With respect to collectability, the Company has written off all receivables not probable of collection and related deferred rent, and has recorded income for those tenants on a cash basis. When the probability assessment has changed for these receivables, the Company has recognized lease income to the extent of the difference between the lease income that would have been recognized if collectability had always been assessed as probable and the lease income recognized to date. For remaining receivables probable of collection, the Company has recorded a general reserve under ASC 450.

For the three months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, the Company charged revenue in the amount of $795 and $1,120, respectively, for residential receivables not deemed probable of collection and recognized revenue of $15 and $19, respectively, for a reassessment of collectability of residential receivables previously not deemed probable of collection.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, the Company charged revenue in the amount of $2,332 and $3,012, respectively, for residential receivables not deemed probable of collection and recognized revenue of $81 and $110, respectively, for a reassessment of collectability of residential receivables previously not deemed probable of collection.

In accordance with the provisions of ASC 842, rental revenue for commercial leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. Deferred rents receivable represents the amount by which straight-line rental revenue exceeds rents currently billed in accordance with lease agreements. Rental income attributable to residential leases and parking is recognized as earned, which is not materially different from the straight-line basis. Leases entered by residents for apartment units are generally for one-year terms, renewable upon consent of both parties on an annual or monthly basis.

Reimbursements for operating expenses due from tenants pursuant to their lease agreements are recognized as revenue in the period the applicable expenses are incurred. These costs generally include real estate taxes, utilities, insurance, common area maintenance costs and other recoverable costs and are recorded as part of commercial rental income in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Stock-based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation.” As such, all equity-based awards are reflected as compensation expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations over their vesting period based on the fair value at the date of grant. In the event of a forfeiture, the previously recognized expense for unvested options would be reversed.

As of September 30, 2026, and December 31, 2025, there were 6,899,543 and 6,156,860 long-term incentive plan ("LTIP”) units outstanding, respectively, with a weighted average grant date fair value of $6.46 and $6.84 per unit, respectively. As of September 30, 2026, and December 31, 2025, there was $14,953 and $15,678, respectively, total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under share incentive plans. As of September 30, 2026, the weighted-average period over which the unrecognized compensation expense will be recorded is approximately 3.24 years.

In March 2026, the Company granted employees and non-employee directors 480,927 and 272,781 LTIP units, respectively, with a weighted-average grant date value of $3.36 per unit. The grants vesting period range from up toone year for those granted to the non-employee directors and fromone to 2.5 years to those granted to employees as 2025 bonus and long-term incentive compensation.

In March 2025, the Company granted employees and non-employee directors 345,561 and 196,000 LTIP units, respectively, with a weighted-average grant date value of $4.54 per unit. The grants vesting period ranges from up toone year for those granted to the non-employee directors and fromone to 2.5 years to those granted to employees as 2024 bonus and long-term incentive compensation.

Transaction Pursuit Costs

Transaction pursuit costs primarily reflect costs incurred for abandoned acquisition, disposition or other transaction pursuits.

Income Taxes

The Company elected to be taxed and to operate in a manner that will allow it to qualify as a REIT under the Code. To qualify as a REIT, the Company is required to distribute dividends equal to at least 90% of the REIT taxable income (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and net capital gains) to its stockholders, and meet the various other requirements imposed by the Code relating to matters such as operating results, asset holdings, distribution levels and diversity of stock ownership. Provided the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, it is generally not subject to U.S. federal corporate-level income tax on the earnings distributed currently to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, the Company will be subject to U.S. federal and state income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate tax rates and any applicable alternative minimum tax. In addition, the Company may not be able to re-elect as a REIT for the four subsequent taxable years. The entities comprising the Predecessor are limited liability companies and are treated as pass-through entities for income tax purposes. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal, state or local income or franchise taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740, the Company believes that it has appropriate support for the income tax positions taken and, as such, does not have any uncertain tax positions that, if successfully challenged, could result in a material impact on its financial position or results of operations. The prior three years’ income tax returns are subject to review by the Internal Revenue Service.

Fair Value Measurements

Refer to Note 6, “Fair Value of Financial Instruments”.

Derivative Financial Instruments

FASB derivative and hedging guidance establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. As required by FASB guidance, the Company records all derivatives on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation.

Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecast transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivative and the hedged item related to the hedged risk are recognized in earnings. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income (loss) (outside of earnings) and subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings, and the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings. The Company assesses the effectiveness of each hedging relationship by comparing the changes in the fair value or cash flows of the derivative hedging instrument with the changes in the fair value or cash flows of the designated hedged item or transaction. For derivatives not designated as hedges, changes in fair value would be recognized in earnings. As of September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the Company has no derivatives for which it applies hedge accounting.

Loss Per Share

Basic and diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding. As of September 30, 2026 and 2025, the Company had unvested LTIP units which provide for non-forfeitable rights to dividend-equivalent payments. Accordingly, these unvested LTIP units are considered participating securities and are included in the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share pursuant to the two-class method. The Company didnot have dilutive securities as of September 30, 2026, or 2025.

The effect of the conversion of the 26,317 Class B LLC units outstanding is not reflected in the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share, as the effect would be anti-dilutive. The net loss allocable to such units is reflected as non-controlling interests in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share for the periods indicated:

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In November 2024, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2024-03, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024-03”), and in January 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-01, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Clarifying the Effective Date ("ASU 2025-01"). ASU 2024-03 requires additional disclosure of the nature of expenses included in the income statement as well as disclosures about specific types of expenses included in the expense captions presented in the income statement. ASU 2024-03, as clarified by ASU 2025-01, is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of these standards on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software (“ASU 2025-06”). This ASU updates the cost capitalization threshold for internal-use software development costs by removing all references to software project development stages and providing new guidance on how to evaluate whether the probable-to-complete recognition threshold has been met. ASU 2025-06 is effective for all entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. Entities may apply the guidance prospectively, retrospectively, or via a modified prospective transition method. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-09, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Hedge Accounting Improvements ("ASU 2025-09"). This ASU amends the existing requirements to allow individual forecasted transactions to be hedged in a group if they have similar risk exposure and introduces an alternative model for the application of hedge accounting to cash flow hedges of forecasted interest payments on choose-your-rate ("CYR") debt instruments. Further, the ASU permits an entity to designate a variable price component of a forecasted purchase or sale of a nonfinancial asset if the component is clearly and closely related to the nonfinancial asset being purchased or sold. ASU 2025-09 is effective for all entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this standard on our consolidated financial statements.

3. Deferred Costs and Intangible Assets

Deferred costs and intangible assets consist of the following:

Amortization of deferred costs, lease origination costs and in-place lease intangible assets was $33 and $25 for the three months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $102 and $76 for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively; Amortization of real estate tax abatements of $120 and $120 for the three months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and $361 and $361 for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, is included in real estate taxes and insurance in the consolidated statements of operations.

Deferred costs and intangible assets as of September 30, 2026, amortize in future years as follows:

4. Notes Payable

The mortgages, loans and mezzanine notes payable collateralized by the properties, or the Company’s interest in the entities that own the properties and assignment of leases, are as follows:

(a) The $329,000 mortgage note agreement with Flagstar Bank N.A. (formerly New York Community Bank (“NYCB”)(“Flagstar”), entered on May 8, 2020, matures on June 1, 2032, and bears interest at 3.125% through May 2027 and thereafter at the prime rate plus 2.75%, subject to an option to fix the rate. The note requires interest-only payments through May 2027, and monthly principal and interest payments thereafter based on a 30-year amortization schedule. The Company has the option to prepay all (but not less than all) of the unpaid balance of the note prior to the maturity date, subject to certain prepayment premiums, as defined.

(b) The $125,000 mortgage note agreement with Citi Real Estate Funding Inc., entered into on May 31, 2019, matures on June 6, 2029, bears interest at 3.63% and requires interest-only payments for the entire term. The Company has the option to prepay all (but not less than all) of the unpaid balance of the note within three months of maturity, without a prepayment premium.

As of August 23, 2025, The City of New York, a municipal corporation acting through the Department of Citywide Administrative Services ("NYC”), vacated the space it occupied at 250 Livingston Street. The lease generally provided for rent payments in the amount of $15.4 million per annum. The Company may be unable to replace NYC as a tenant or unable to replace it with other commercial tenants at comparable rent rates, may incur substantial costs to improve the vacated space or may have to offer significant inducements to fill the space, all of which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.

On March 18, 2025, The Company was notified by legal counsel to the servicer for the loan related to the 250 Livingston Street property that, due to the failure of our subsidiary, 250 Livingston Owner LLC (the “Borrower”), to cause all revenue generated by the 250 Livingston Street property to be deposited into the cash management account as required by the loan agreement related to the $125,000 building mortgage loan, an event of default occurred under the $125,000 building mortgage loan. The notice provided that if the Borrower fails to cure the event of default, the Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee for the GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2019-GC40 securitization, as the lender (the “Lender”) may, among other things, accelerate the $125,000 building mortgage loan and demand all amounts owing to the lender to be immediately payable, institute proceedings for the foreclosure of all liens securing the loan and sell the 250 Livingston Street Property, or file a lawsuit against the Borrower or the Company and its operating subsidiary, Clipper Realty L.P., as guarantors (the “Guarantors”). As of May 12, 2025, the Company have complied with the lender’s requirement to have the deposits made by all tenants deposited directly into the cash management account. On May 8, 2025, the Company transferred $6,300 to the cash management account to cover amounts owed prior to the activation of the cash management account. On May 15, 2025, legal counsel for the lender notified us that they allege that the Company are in default on the $125,000 mortgage loan due to its allegation that the Company, as the Guarantor, did not maintain a net worth of not less than $100,000 as of December 31, 2024, as required under the loan agreement. The Company replied to the lender disputing such calculation and alleging that the lender did not calculate net worth in a reasonable manner and provided the lender with its own calculation of net worth that shows a net worth in excess of the required amount. On May 28, 2025, the lender replied to the Company concurring with the Company and notifying the Company that they agree that the Company was compliant with the $100 million requirement. On July 28, 2025, the Company was notified by legal counsel for the lender that they alleged that the Company was once again in default for failure to remit all revenue derived from 250 Livingston into the cash management account. The Company responded by disputing the allegations in May 8, 2025, letter and noting all rents from the tenants have been deposited into the cash management account.

All amounts remaining in such cash management account after the lender’s allocations set forth in the loan agreement will be disbursed to us if the tenant cure conditions are satisfied under the loan agreement.

On October 6, 2025, the Company failed to make its required deposit to the cash management account to fund the interest and tax escrow deposit for September 2025. The Company received notices of nonpayment on October 20, 2025, and November 12, 2025. The loan documents state that a failure to pay interest within five days of due date is an event of default. On November 12, 2025, the Company sent a letter to Midland requesting that the loan be immediately fully transferred to Special Servicing for potential loan modifications because the Borrower does not plan to continue to support the ongoing operating and debt service shortfall related to 250 Livingston Street property.

On December 18, 2025, the Company received a letter from the Special Servicer notifying the Company that it is in default under the Note and other Loan documents by virtue of, among other things, its failure to pay all amounts when due thereunder. The notice indicated that the Lender would take all such actions as it deems appropriate to protect its interest in the Loan and to collect the debt thereunder including, without limitation, seeking foreclosure and/or reconveyance of its security under the Loan documents. In accordance with the Loan documents, the Company is subject to default interest at a rate of additional 5% per annum.

On January 7, 2026, the Borrower received a letter from counsel for the Lender and the special servicer for the Lender, notifying the Borrower that it is in default under the Loan Agreement, the Note and other loan documents by virtue of, among other things, its failure to pay all amounts when due thereunder from October 6, 2025 through and including January 6, 2026. The letter indicated that the Lender’s counsel would assist the Lender in taking all such actions as it deems appropriate to protect its interest in the Loan and to collect the debt thereunder including, without limitation, seeking foreclosure and/or reconveyance of its security under the loan documents. The Company believes that, as of September 30, 2026, the Company owed approximately $10,373 in interest, default interest and fees.

On March 25, 2026, the Lender filed a complaint against the Borrower, the Company and the Company’s subsidiary Clipper Realty L.P. due to the Borrower’s defaults under the Note and the other Loan documents. The Plaintiff demanded, among other things, that a receiver be appointed to manage the Property and that the Property and the personal property within the Property be sold and the proceeds be applied to the satisfaction of indebtedness evidenced by the Note and other Loan documents. On April 29, 2026, the court entered an order granting the Lender's demand to appoint a temporary receiver. Pursuant to the court order, the receiver is authorized to enter into the possession of the Property, to rent or lease any part of the premises, to collect and receive all rents and fees due and unpaid in connection with the premises, and the Company must turn over to the receiver all rents collected from and after the date of the court order.

Effective as of June 4, 2026 (the “Effective Date”, the Borrower, the Guarantors and the Lender entered into a Consent and Cooperation Agreement (the “Agreement”). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Lender and the Borrower agreed to jointly market and sell the Loan to a third-party buyer during a marketing period that commenced on the Effective Date and ending 45 days thereafter (the “Marketing Period”) subject to extension at the Lender’s sole discretion. At the end of the Marketing Period, the Lender has the right to foreclose on the Property, including taking the deed to the Property in lieu of foreclosure. As of November 4, 2026, the Lender has not taken any such actions. The Agreement also provides that the Borrower has the right to submit an offer to purchase the Loan.

(c) The $100,000 mortgage note agreement with Citi Real Estate Funding Inc., entered into on February 18, 2021 matures on March 6, 2031, bears interest at 3.21% and requires interest-only payments for the entire term. The Company has the option to prepay all (but not less than all) of the unpaid balance of the note within three months of maturity, without a prepayment premium.

The 141 Livingston Street lease expired on December 27, 2025. The Company and City of New York are continuing to work through the finalizing of a previously agreed five-year extension of its expired lease. There can be no assurance that the negotiations will conclude with an agreement. The expired lease at 141 Livingston Street provided for $10,300 in rent per annum. The City of New York continues to occupy the space and is paying holdover rent in accordance with the terms of the expired lease which are the same as those in the final term of the expired lease.

If we are unable to finalize the agreement, we would be at risk of not being able to replace NYC as a tenant, leasing the space below the current rates, incurring costs to improve the space or offering other inducements to fill the space, all of which may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flow.

On October 28, 2024, we received notice that, as of October 7, 2024, the servicing of the mortgage notes was transferred to a special servicer (the "Special Servicer”) due to our alleged failure to make certain required payments under the loan agreement, including, but not limited to, a $10,000 reserve deposit starting on July 7, 2024.

On December 24, 2025, the Company entered into a Loan Modification Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the registered holders of certain commercial mortgage pass-through certificates related to the Loan (collectively, the “Lender”), to settle ongoing litigation between the Lender, the Borrower, the Company and the Operating Partnership related primarily to the above-mentioned alleged failure to establish a $10,000 reserve in connection with the 5-year extension of the expired NYC lease. The Agreement became effective on December 30, 2025. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company provided a $10,000 renewal tenant reserve account letter of credit and paid fees of approximately $2,200 to the special servicer and to counsel to the Lender, the Lender waived its claimed late charges and default interest, agreed to dismiss with prejudice pending foreclosure actions, and approved the previously submitted five-year lease extension with the Property’s New York City tenant effective December 28, 2025. On March 6, 2026, the Loan was returned to regular servicing from special servicing.

(d) The $360,000 loan with Deutsche Bank, entered into on February 21, 2018, matures on March 6, 2028, bears interest at 4.506% and requires interest-only payments for the entire term. The Company has the option to prepay all (but not less than all) of the unpaid balance of the loan prior to the maturity date, subject to a prepayment premium if it occurs prior to December 6, 2027.

(e) The $56,422 mortgage note agreement with Capital One Multifamily Finance LLC matures on July 1, 2028, and bears interest at 3.68%. The note required interest-only payments through July 2017, and monthly principal and interest payments of $321 thereafter based on a 30-year amortization schedule. The Company has the option to prepay the note prior to the maturity date, subject to a prepayment premium.

(f) The $82,000 mortgage note agreement with MetLife Investment Management, entered into on November 8, 2019, matures on December 1, 2029, bears interest at 3.53% and requires interest-only payments for the entire term. The Company has the option, commencing on January 1, 2024, to prepay the note prior to the maturity date, subject to a prepayment premium if it occurs prior to September 2, 2029.

(g) On August 10, 2021, the Company entered into a group of loans with AIG Asset Management (U.S.), LLC, succeeding a property acquisition loan, providing for maximum borrowings of $52,500 to develop the property. The notes had a 36-month term, bore interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 3.60% (with a floor of 4.1%). The notes were scheduled to mature on September 1, 2024 and could have been extended until September 1, 2026. The Company could have prepaid the unpaid balance of the note within five months of maturity without penalty.

On February 9, 2023, the Company refinanced this construction loan with a mortgage loan with Valley National Bank which provided for maximum borrowings of $80,000. The loan provided initial funding of $60,000 and a further $20,000 subject to achievement of certain financial targets. The loan has a term offive years and an initial annual interest rate of 5.7% subject to reduction by up to 25 basis points upon achievement of certain financial targets (during the quarter ended June 30, 2023, the Company achieved the applicable financial target, and the interest rate was reduced to 5.55%). The interest rate on subsequent fundings will be fixed at the time of any funding. The loan requires interest-only payments for the first two years and principal and interest thereafter based on a 30-year amortization schedule. The Company has the option to prepay in full, or in part, the unpaid balance of the note prior to the maturity date. Prior to the second anniversary of the date of the note prepayment is subject to certain prepayment premiums, as defined. After the second anniversary of the date of the note the prepayment is not subject to a prepayment premium.

On September 15, 2023, the Company borrowed an additional $20,000 from Valley National Bank (“Valley”). The additional borrowing has a term of twenty-four months and an annual interest rate of 6.37%. The loan is interest only subject to the maintenance of certain financial targets after the first 16 months of the term. In conjunction with the additional borrowing, the Company and the bank agreed to amend the expiration date of the initial $60,000 to expire at the same time as the additional borrowing. No change was made to the interest rate on the initial borrowing.

On October 1, 2025, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Citi Real Estate Funding Inc., a New York corporation, and Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., a national banking association, as the lenders, dated as of October 1, 2025.

The Loan Agreement provides for the $84,500 million loan to the Company (the “Loan”). The Loan has a maturity date of October 6, 2030 and bears interest at a 5.73% rate per annum. The Loan is secured by the residential rental property located at 1010 Pacific Street, Brooklyn, New York (the “Property”).

On October 1, 2025, concurrently with entering into the Loan Agreement, the Company repaid the $80,000 mortgage loan with Valley and terminated its loan agreement with Valley. In connection with this refinancing, the Company paid Valley approximately $80,400 of principal and accrued interest outstanding under its prior loan agreement.

The Company incurred no fees or costs as a result of the termination of its loan with Valley the Company incurred approximately $1,700 in closing costs and prepaid interest and set aside approximately $200 is escrow accounts for property taxes, property insurance and rent reserves under the Loan Agreement. The Company received net proceeds of approximately $2,100 from this refinancing at the time of closing.

(h) On December 22, 2021, the Company entered into a $30,000 mortgage note agreement with Bank Leumi, N.A. related to the Dean Street acquisition. The note’s original maturity was December 22, 2022 and was subsequently extended to September 22, 2023. The note required interest-only payments and bears interest at the prime rate (with a floor of 3.25%) plus 1.60%. In April 2022, the Company borrowed an additional $6,985 under the mortgage note in connection with the acquisition of additional parcels of land in February and April 2022.

On August 10, 2023, the Company refinanced its $37,000 mortgage on its Dean Street development with a senior construction loan (“Senior Loan”) with Valley National Bank that permits borrowings up to $115,000 and a mezzanine loan (the “Mezzanine Loan”) with BADF 953 Dean Street Lender LLC that permits borrowings up to $8,000.

The Senior Loan allows maximum borrowings of $115,000 for a 30-month term, hastwo 6-month extension options, and bears interest at 1-Month Term SOFR plus 4.00%, with an all-in floor of 5.50%. The Senior Loan consists of a land loan, funded at closing to refinance the existing loan totaling $36,985, a construction loan of up to $62,400 and a project loan of up to $15,600. The Company has provided a 30% payment guarantee of outstanding borrowings among other standard indemnities.

The Mezzanine Loan allows maximum borrowings of $8,000 for a 30-month term, havetwo 6-month extension options, and bears interest at 1-Month Term SOFR plus 10%, with an all-in floor of 13%. Interest shall accrue on the principal, is compounded monthly and is due at the end of the term of the loan. At closing, $4,500 was funded to cover closing costs incurred on the construction loans and the remaining $3,500 was drawn for ongoing construction costs.

On May 2, 2025, the Company entered into the Multifamily Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”), dated as of May 2, 2025 and the Mezzanine Multifamily Loan and Security Agreement (the “Mezzanine Loan Agreement” and together with the Loan Agreement, the “New Loan Agreements”) with MF1 Capital, a company not affiliated with the Company dated as of May 2, 2025.

The Loan Agreement provides for $115,000 and the Mezzanine Loan Agreement provides for the $26,750 loan to Dean Member (collectively, the “Loans”). The Loans have an initial May 9, 2027, maturity date, with three one-year extensions available upon meeting the applicable extension conditions, and bear interest at 2.65% rate, plus 1-Month CME Term SOFR (with a floor of 2.25%) (6.47% at September 30, 2026). The Company can borrow up to an additional $18,250 under the Mezzanine Loan Agreement based on meeting various performance targets over the term of the loan. Under the Loan Agreement, the Company deposited with MF1 Capital (i) $4,250 for a shortfall reserve account to pay interest and operating expenses during the initial lease up period of the Dean Street Property, and (ii) $1,550 for completion reserve deposits towards the completion of the construction of the building.

Subsequent to the loan closing the Company drew an additional $8,250 from the Mezzanine Loan.

The New Loan Agreements also contain customary representations, covenants, events of default and certain limited guarantees.

In addition, the Company purchased an interest rate cap with US Bank that caps the SOFR portion of the interest rate on the Loans at 6%.

Concurrently with entering into the New Loan Agreements, the Company repaid the $115,000 Senior Loan and the $8,000 Mezzanine Loan, plus $2,900 in accrued interest. The Company incurred no fees or costs as a result of the termination of the Prior Loan Agreements, and the Company incurred approximately $3,104 in closing costs for the New Loan Agreements.

On April 30, 2025, the Company entered into a $10,000 corporate line of credit with Valley National Bank. The line of credit bears interest of Prime +4.0%. On May 1, 2025, the Company drew $5,000 from the line of credit. On May 2, 2025, the Company repaid the balance with proceeds from the Loans. On April 14, 2026, the Company and Valley National Bank extended the term of the line of credit to April 14, 2027.

On December 24, 2025, the Company issued a $10,000 letter of credit to lenders of the Company’s 141 Livingston Street property.

The Company has provided a limited guaranty for mortgage notes at several of its properties. The Company’s loan agreements contain customary representations, covenants and events of default. Certain loan agreements require the Company to comply with affirmative and negative covenants, including the maintenance of debt service coverage and debt yield ratios. In the event that the Company is not compliant, certain lenders may require cash sweeps of rent until the conditions are cured. Except as described above, the Company is not in default on any of its loan agreements.

The following table summarizes principal payment requirements under the terms of the mortgage notes as of September 30, 2026:

5. Rental Income under Operating Leases

The Company’s commercial properties are leased to commercial tenants under operating leases with fixed terms of varying lengths. As of September 30, 2026, the minimum future cash rents receivable (excluding tenant reimbursements for operating expenses) under non-cancelable operating leases for the commercial tenants in each of the next five years and thereafter are as follows:

The Company has commercial leases with the City of New York that comprised approximately 11% and 16% of total revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and 11% and 20% of total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. As of September 30, 2026, the Kings County Court occupied all 206,084 of rentable square feet at 141 Livingston Street subject to hold-over rent provisions in the lease that expired on December 27, 2025. The City of New York lease at 250 Livingston Street was terminated as August 27, 2025.

6. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

GAAP requires the measurement of certain financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis. In addition, GAAP requires the measure of other financial instruments and balances at fair value on a non-recurring basis (e.g., carrying value of impaired real estate and long-lived assets). Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The GAAP fair value framework uses a three-tiered approach. Fair value measurements are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

When available, the Company utilizes quoted market prices from an independent third-party source to determine fair value and classifies such items in Level 1 or Level 2. In instances where the market for a financial instrument is not active, regardless of the availability of a nonbinding quoted market price, observable inputs might not be relevant and could require the Company to make a significant adjustment to derive a fair value measurement. Additionally, in an inactive market, a market price quoted from an independent third party may rely more on models with inputs based on information available only to that independent third party. When the Company determines the market for a financial instrument owned by the Company to be illiquid or when market transactions for similar instruments do not appear orderly, the Company uses several valuation sources (including internal valuations, discounted cash flow analysis and quoted market prices) and establishes a fair value by assigning weights to the various valuation sources.

Changes in assumptions or estimation methodologies can have a material effect on these estimated fair values. In this regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

The financial assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, security deposits and notes payable. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and security deposits reported in the consolidated balance sheets approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value of notes payable, which are classified as Level 2, is estimated by discounting the contractual cash flows of each debt instrument to their present value using adjusted market interest rates.

The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the notes payable are as follows:

7. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal

On October 15, 2021, Rodney Sanchez (“Plaintiff”) filed a Class and Collective Action Complaint (the “Complaint”) against and the Company and certain of its affiliates and Clipper Equity LLC (collectively, the “Defendants”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The Plaintiff alleged that he was jointly employed by the Defendants and that the Defendants: (a) failed to pay Plaintiff and similarly situated employees overtime in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and New York Labor Law (“NYLL”); (b) failed to pay Plaintiff and similarly situated employees for training sessions in violation of the FLSA and NYLL; (c) failed to pay Plaintiff and similarly situated employees on a timely basis in violation of NYLL; and (d) failed to provide Plaintiff and similarly situated employees with wage statements and wage notices as required by NYLL. On February 24, 2026, the court granted both summary judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs and class certification for 22 buildings. The Company has appealed against the judgement to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The Company and the Plaintiff attended a mediation session on April 13, 2026. As a result of the court rulings and the discussions held during the mediation session, on May 28, 2026, the Company reached a settlement with the plaintiffs. Based on the settlement, the Company reserved $3,589 during the nine-months ended September 30, 2026, and paid $1,512 of that amount during nine months ended September 30, 2026, for the Company’s estimated share of the Defendants’ loss and legal fees. Due to the nature of class action settlements, the loss may be lower or higher based on final claims.

On or about May 1, 2019, a former employee (“Plaintiff”) of a contractor (“Contractor”) commenced a lawsuit against 250 Livingston Owner LLC and Clipper affiliated entities (the “Company”), alleging personal injury claims and labor law violations while performing work for the Contractor who had agreed to indemnify the Company for such claims. Notwithstanding, the Court incorrectly named the Company and the Contractor as liable for a $2.5 million settlement between Plaintiff and Contractor. The Company has undertaken to have the Company removed from the judgment. The Company does not deem it probable that a loss will be incurred.

On March 20, 2025, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the registered holders of certain pass-through certificates issued by trusts that are the holders of the promissory mortgage notes secured by the 141 Livingston Street property, referred to as "Plaintiff,” filed a lawsuit against the Borrower, as well as us and our Operating Partnership subsidiary, as guarantors, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Plaintiff demands, among other things, that (i) the 141 Livingston Street property be sold and the Plaintiff be paid the amounts due under the loan agreement, with interest thereon to the time of such payment, together with, among other items, the expenses of the sale, Plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees; (ii) Plaintiff be paid all rents and revenues of the 141 Livingston Street property as they become due and payable; (iii) a receiver be appointed to manage the 141 Livingston Street property, with power among other things to demand and recover payment from anyone who has received a distribution from 141 Borrower after any event of default; (iv) Plaintiff have such other and further relief as may be just and equitable; (v) guarantors pay to Plaintiff the amount of any losses or damages suffered or incurred by Plaintiff as the court may determine to be just and equitable and amounts owed under the guaranty.

On December 24, 2025, the Company entered into the Loan Modification Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the registered holders of certain commercial mortgage pass-through certificates related to the Loan (collectively, the “Lender”), to settle the ongoing litigation between the Lender, the Borrower, the Company and the Operating Partnership. The Agreement became effective on December 30, 2025. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company provided a $10,000 renewal tenant reserve account letter of credit and paid fees of approximately $2,200 to the special servicer and to counsel to the Lender, the Lender waived its claimed late charges and default interest, agreed to dismiss with prejudice the pending foreclosure actions, and approved the previously submitted five-year lease extension with the Property’s New York City tenant effective December 28, 2025.

On March 25, 2026, Wells Fargo Bank. National Association, as trustee for the benefit of the registered holders of GS Mortgage Securities Trust 2019-GC40, commercial mortgage pass through certificates, series 2019-GC40 and the Pooled RR Interest owner (the “Lender” and the “Plaintiff”) the lender for the 250 Livingston Street (the “Property”) mortgage note (the “Note”) filed a complaint against 250 Livingston Owner LLC (the “Borrower”), the Company and the Company’s subsidiary Clipper Realty L.P. in the Kings County Supreme Court due to the Borrower’s defaults under the Note and the other Loan documents. The Plaintiff demanded, among other things, that a receiver be appointed to manage the Property and that the Property and the personal property within the Property be sold and the proceeds be applied to the satisfaction of indebtedness evidenced by the Note and other Loan documents. On April 29, 2026, the court entered an order granting the Lender's demand to appoint a temporary receiver. Pursuant to the court order, the receiver is authorized to enter into the possession of the Property, to rent or lease any part of the premises, to collect and receive all rents and fees due and unpaid in connection with the premises, and the Company must turn over to the receiver all rents collected from and after the date of the court order.

The Borrower, the Guarantors and the Lender entered into the Consent and Cooperation Agreement (the “Agreement”), effective as of June 4, 2026 (the “Effective Date”). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Lender and the Borrower agreed to jointly market and sell the Loan to a third-party buyer during a marketing period that commenced on the Effective Date and ends 45 days thereafter (the “Marketing Period”), subject to extension at the Lender’s sole discretion. At the end of the Marketing Period, the Lender has the right to foreclose on the Property, including taking the deed to the Property in lieu of foreclosure. As of November 4, 2026, the Lender has not taken any such actions. The Agreement also provides that the Borrower has the right to submit an offer to purchase the Loan.

In addition to the above, the Company is subject to certain legal proceedings and claims arising in connection with its business. Management believes, based in part upon consultation with legal counsel, that the ultimate resolution of all such claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

Commitments

On June 29, 2023 the Company entered into the Article 11 Agreement. Under the Article 11 agreement, the Company has entered into a Housing Repair and Maintenance Letter Agreement (“HRMLA”) in which the Company has agreed to perform certain capital improvements to Flatbush Gardens over the next three years. The current estimate is that the costs of that work will be an amount of up to $27 million. The Company expects those costs to be offset by the savings provided by property tax exemption and enhanced payments for tenants receiving government assistance (See note 1). As of July 22, 2026, the Company has substantially completed the scope of work required under the HRMLA.

On December 24, 2025, the Company issued a $10,000 irrevocable standby letter of credit with Valley National Bank, NA, to the benefit of Midland Loan Services as Master Servicer for Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, in connection with the Loan Modification Agreement at our 141 Livingston property (see above). The letter of credit expires on December 24, 2026, but will be automatically extended annually for a one-year period until April 7, 2032, the date of the mortgage loan expiration on 141 Livingston Street. Midland Loan Services may draw on the loan in accordance with the Loan Modification Agreement.

Concentrations

The Company’s properties are located in the Boroughs of Manhattan and Brooklyn in New York City, which exposes the Company to greater economic risks than if it owned a more geographically dispersed portfolio.

The breakdown between commercial and residential revenue is as follows (unaudited):

8. Related-Party Transactions

The Company recorded office and overhead expenses pertaining to a related company in general and administrative expense of $60 and $60 for the three months ended September 30, 2026, and 2025 respectively and $180 and $237 for the nine months ended September 30, 2026, and 2025 respectively The Company recognized a charge/(credit) to reimbursable payroll expense pertaining to a related company in general and administrative expense of $(25) and $(124) for the three months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively and $(69) and $(259) for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025.

On October 10, 2024, the Company guaranteed an agreement between the Company's subsidiary, 250 Livingston Owner LLC, and Iron Hound Management Company LLC (“Iron Hound”), whose principal is the Company's director Roberto Verrone, to provide consulting services regarding the loan related to the 250 Livingston Street property. The initial fee paid upon the agreement is $125 and the agreement also includes restructuring and other fees payable upon certain loan modifications. The arrangement was approved by an independent committee of the Company’s board of directors. 141 Livingston Owner LLC, engaged Ironhound to assist in negotiating a settlement to its litigation related to mortgage loan, see Note 7 above. During the nine months ended September 30, 2026, The Company paid Ironhound $500 for its services, The payment had been accrued and was included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2025. The arrangement was approved by an independent committee of the Company’s board of directors.

9. Segment Reporting

The Company is a New York City real estate investment trust that is focused on developing, redeveloping and operating properties in the commercial and residential space.

Our Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), represented by our Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, reviews the results in which the revenue and Income from Operations is divided between the commercial and residential performance. This metric enables the CODM to evaluate how the business is growing, as revenue is the key driver of growth. Additionally, the CODM uses segment income (loss) to allocate resources in the annual budgeting and forecasting process. The CODM considers budget to actual variances when making decisions about allocating capital to each segment.

The Company has classified its reporting segments into commercial and residential rental properties. The commercial reporting segment includes the 141 Livingston Street property and portions of the 250 Livingston Street, Tribeca House, Dean Street and Aspen properties. The residential reporting segment includes the Flatbush Gardens property, the Clover House property, the 10 West 65th Street property, the 1010 Pacific Street property and portions of the 250 Livingston Street, Tribeca House, Dean Street and Aspen properties. 10 West 65th Street property was sold on May 30, 2025, and 953 Dean Street was put into service on August 1, 2025.

Presented below are reconciliations of the reportable segment total revenues to the consolidated revenues, the reportable segment total operating expenses to consolidate operating expenses, the reportable income from operations to the consolidated income from operations, the segment and consolidated income from operations to segment and consolidated net income(loss), the reportable segment assets to the consolidated assets, the reportable segment interest expense to the consolidated interest expense and thereportable segment capital expenditures to the consolidated capital expenditures.

The Company’s total assets by segment are as follows, as of:

The Company’s capital expenditures, including acquisition by segment for the three months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, is as follows:

The Company allocates assets, expenses and capital expenditures to each reportable segment by building. For those buildings that are shared between the segment’s allocations are done based on the percentage relative square footage of the building that is used to generate revenue for the segment. All corporate costs are allocated based on the percentage of square footage of the segment.

10. Impairment of long-lived assets

On March 31, 2025 the Company determined that its long-lived asset group related to 10 West 65 th Street met the qualifications for an asset held for sale by determining that the sale of 10 West 65 th Street was probable in addition to the other five criteria previously met. That determination was based on indications that the Company received that it was probable that a purchaser was prepared to purchase 10 West 65 th Street at a price the Company would be willing to transact.

Long-lived assets classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of its carrying amount or fair-value less costs to sell. As such, the Company recorded an impairment of the asset held for sale of $33,780 on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and in the residential segment in the Company’s segment reporting (see footnote 9), based on the estimated selling price of $45,500 less carrying costs in investment in real estate, net, and estimated selling costs expected at the time of the sale. See footnote 1 for details of the completion of transaction to dispose of the long-lived assets.

11. Subsequent Events

Subsequent to September 30, 2026, the Board of Directors declared a third quarter dividend of $0.095 per share, to stockholders of record on November 17, 2026, payable November 25, 2026.