SECURITY FEDERAL CORP
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Mar 20, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Mar 20, 2026
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Security Federal Corporation and Subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements (collectively, the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The Company reported a gross loan portfolio of $686.6 million and related allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) of $13.5 million as of December 31, 2025. In order to measure expected credit losses on a collective basis, the Company has elected to utilize a weighted-average remaining life (“WARM”) methodology for all segments. Loans not sharing similar risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. The WARM method applies a loss rate to a given pool of loans over the estimated remaining life of the given pool. The remaining life of the pool is based on Company historical data. In addition, a 6-month forecast is applied to each segment, based on external sources, with immediate reversion to historical loss rates at the end of the forecast period. Additionally, a qualitative scorecard is used by management to assess the need for adjustments to expected credit loss estimates for information not already captured in the quantitative loss estimation process. The qualitative scorecard evaluates certain risks such as portfolio risk, economic trends, lending policies, credit administration risk, and industry conditions.
We identified the Company’s estimate of the allowance for credit losses as a critical audit matter. The principal consideration for our determination of the ACL as a critical audit matter related to the high degree of complexity and judgment in the determination of significant model assumptions, specifically, the qualitative factor adjustments to quantitative loss rates. Auditing these complex judgments and assumptions made by the Company involves challenging auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of audit evidence and effort required to address these matters, including the extent of specialized skill or knowledge needed.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following:
We obtained an understanding of the Company’s process for establishing the ACL, including the basis for development and related adjustments of the qualitative factor components of the ACL.
We evaluated the relevance and reasonableness of key assumptions by assessing portfolio segmentation, credit quality indicators, current credit conditions, and the incorporation of reasonable and supportable economic forecasts.
We tested the completeness and accuracy of significant inputs to the model including the underlying data used to develop the qualitative factors.
We validated the mathematical accuracy of the calculation.
We evaluated the reasonableness of assumptions and data used by the Company in developing the qualitative factors by comparing these data points to internally developed and third-party sources, and other audit evidence gathered.
We have served as the Company's auditor since 1998.
/s/Elliott Davis, LLC
Columbia, South Carolina
March 20, 2026
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.