Rekor Systems, Inc.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Mar 31, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2024 · Filed Mar 31, 2025
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Rekor Systems, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Rekor Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.** **
Explanatory Paragraph–** Going Concern**
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As more fully described in Note 1, the Company has incurred significant losses and will need to raise additional funds to meet its obligations and sustain its operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Critical Audit Matter–** Auditing the Fair Value of Intangible Assets Acquired in a Business Combination**
As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding membership interests of All Traffic Data Service, LLC (“ATD”) on January 2, 2024 for total consideration of $20.6 million. The Company accounted for this transaction as a business combination under the acquisition method of accounting whereby the fair value of the consideration transferred was allocated to the assets acquired, including a customer relationship intangible asset of $11.9 million and trade names of $0.2 million, and liabilities assumed based upon their acquisition date fair values. Management estimated the fair value of the customer relationship intangible asset using a multi-period excess earnings method whereby residual forecasted cash flows expected to be derived from the intangible asset over the economic life of the asset, adjusted for expected attrition, are discounted to present value.
We identified the valuation of the customer relationship intangible asset at the ATD acquisition date as a critical audit matter because of the significant assumptions management used in estimating the fair values, including forecasted cash flows and the selection of a discount rate for the customer relationship intangible asset. Auditing management’s assumptions involved a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased audit effort, including the use of valuation specialists, due to the impact these assumptions could have on the accounting estimates.
Our audit procedures related to the valuation of the customer relationship intangible asset included the following, among others:
| ● | We reviewed the interest purchase agreement to understand and evaluate the terms of the acquisition and accounting for the acquisition. |
| ● | We tested the reasonableness of management’s forecasted cash flows used in the valuation of the customer relationship intangible asset. This testing included analyzing ATD’s historical revenue growth rates, margins, customer attrition rate, and capital expenditures and comparing them to the forecasted amounts. Additionally, we considered the post-acquisition performance trajectory of the Company’s most recent prior business combination in order to establish a benchmark. |
We utilized our valuation specialists to perform the following procedures, among others:
| ● | Evaluate the appropriateness of the valuation method used by management to estimate the fair values of the customer relationship intangible asset and test the mathematical accuracy of the model. |
| ● | Assess the reasonableness of certain key inputs used to develop the fair value measurements including the discount rate and the inputs to the cost of capital assumption |
| ● | Test the fair value measurement for the customer relationship intangible asset by performing an independent calculation of the value |
/s/Marcum LLP
Marcum LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2019
Morristown, NJ
March 31, 2025
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.