Aqua Metals, Inc.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Mar 31, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2024 · Filed Mar 31, 2025
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Item 8. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Aqua Metals, Inc.
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Aqua Metals, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Going Concern
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred substantial operating losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to this matter are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits.
We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Critical Audit Matter–*** Equity-Classified Warrants***
As described in Note 12 and Note 13, the Company issued (1) warrants to purchase 39,125 shares and 1,006,250 shares of the Company's common stock in connection with the Company's May 2024 public offering of common stock, and (2) warrants to purchase 750,000 shares of the Company's common stock in connection with the Company’s December 2024 offering of secured promissory notes. The Company evaluated whether the warrants were in the scope of ASC Topic 480Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, which discusses the accounting for instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. The application of the requirements in ASC Topic 480, and the resulting classification conclusion, is dependent on whether certain criteria are met. Based on its analysis, the Company concluded that (1) the 1,045,375 total warrants issued in May 2024 did not meet any of the criteria to be subject to liability classification and are therefore classified as equity and (2) the 750,000 warrants issued in December 2024 met the criteria to be subject to liability classification.
We identified the classification of the warrants as a critical audit matter. The principal considerations for that determination included the complexity and effort required in identifying all relevant features of and obligations under the instruments for evaluation against the criteria for classification. This required a high degree of auditor effort, including specialized skills and knowledge, and complex auditor judgment in evaluating the features of and obligations under the warrants and the determination of whether such features meet the criteria for liability-classification.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:
| ● | We obtained an understanding of management’s process for identifying and evaluating the critical terms of the warrant agreements in determining the classification. |
| ● | With the assistance of professionals in our firm that have specialized skills and knowledge in accounting for debt and equity instruments: |
| o | We evaluated management’s analysis and conclusions regarding the relevant provisions and features of the warrants in light of relevant guidance and the criteria for classification. |
| o | We read the securities purchase agreement and underlying warrant agreements to identify the relevant features and settlement provisions for our evaluation. |
| o | We independently evaluated the relevant features and settlement provisions of the warrants under relevant guidance considering the criteria for classification. |
/s/Forvis Mazars, LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2023.
New York, New York
March 31, 2025
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.