Skip to main content

Sharplink, Inc.

For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Mar 14, 2025.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2024 · Filed Mar 14, 2025

SBET$5.85-4.6%Stored close · as of Nov 10, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

SharpLink Gaming, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Minneapolis, Minnesota

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of SharpLink Gaming, Inc. and Subsidiaries, formerly known as SharpLink Gaming, Ltd. and Subsidiaries, (the Company) as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2024 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024 and 2023, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2024, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Explanatory Paragraph–** Going Concern**

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations that raise substantial doubt about their ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s evaluations of the events and conditions and management’s plans regarding those matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the Audit Committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements; and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Description of Matter

As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, a significant portion of the Company’s revenue recognized is for commission and fee revenue and software license contracts that include multiple performance obligations including, but not limited to, the following: development, hosting, operations, maintenance, and service of games and contests.

Due to the nature of the Company’s revenue sources including multiple performance obligations, management exercises significant judgment in the following areas in determining appropriate revenue recognition:

●Determination of which products and services are considered to be a distinct performance obligation that should be accounted for separately or combined.
●Determination of the pattern of delivery for each distinct performance obligation.
●Determination of which products and services are recognized over time or point in time.
●Determination of recognition of the contract liabilities which also included prize liability and customer deposits.

As a result, a high degree of auditor judgment was required in performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s judgments. Changes in these estimates can have a material effect on the amount of revenue recognized on these contracts.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

Based on our knowledge of the Company, we determined the nature and extent of procedures to be performed over revenue, including the determination of revenue streams over which those procedures were performed. Our audit procedures included the following for each revenue stream where procedures were performed:

●Obtained an understanding of the internal controls and processes in place over the Company’s revenue recognition processes.
●Analyzed the significant assumptions and estimates made by management as discussed above.
●Selected a sample of revenue transactions and assessed the recorded revenue, analyzed the related contract, assessed likelihood of collection, tested management’s identification of distinct performance obligations, and compared amounts recognized for consistency within underlying documentation.

Convertible Debenture and Related Warrants

Description of Matter

At December 31, 2024, the Company had a convertible note with an outstanding principal balance of $4.0 million net of debt discount, warrant discount, accrued interest, and changes in fair value contributing to a reported fair value as of December 31, 2024 of $4.4 million. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note, the Company also issued new and modified existing warrants with the holder. Calculations and accounting for the convertible note and warrant at fair value require management’s judgments related to initial and subsequent recognition, use of a valuation model, and determination of the appropriate inputs used in the selected valuation model. As more fully described in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company made an election at the time of issuance to record the convertible note at its fair value with changes in fair value recorded through the consolidated statements of operations. To value the convertible note, the Company utilized a Monte Carlo Simulation to incorporate certain probabilities and assumptions determined at issuance and at December 31, 2024. A Black-Scholes valuation method was used in measuring the fair value of the warrants.

Auditing management’s valuations of the convertible note and related warrants was challenging due to the complexity of the valuation model and the inputs that are highly sensitive to changes such as the common stock market price, volatility, risk free rates, and yields.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

Based on our knowledge of the Company, we determined the nature and extent of procedures to be performed over the convertible note and related warrants, including the determination of proper accounting treatment and the initial and subsequent measurement principles applied. Our audit procedures included the following:

●Obtained an understanding of the internal controls and processes in place over the Company’s recording of significant and unusual transactions dealing with complex accounting.
●Obtained and analyzed contracts related to the convertible note and warrants.
●Tested completeness and accuracy of the data used as well as management’s application of the relevant accounting guidance.
●Assessed the intent and ability of management while evaluating certain assumptions utilized in the valuation models.
●We evaluated the Company’s determination of fair value of the convertible note, including testing the appropriateness of the methodology used and assessing the reasonableness of the underlying inputs.

/s/Cherry Bekaert LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2022.

Raleigh, North Carolina

March [ ], 2025

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.