Bank of New York Mellon Corp
For the period ended Jun 30, 2025. Filed Aug 1, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Jun 30, 2025 · Filed Aug 1, 2025
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Consolidated balance sheet review
One of our key risk management objectives is to maintain a balance sheet that remains strong throughout market cycles to meet the expectations of our major stakeholders, including our shareholders, clients, creditors and regulators.
We also seek to undertake overall liquidity risk, including intraday liquidity risk, that stays within our risk appetite. The objective of our balance sheet
22 BNY management strategy is to maintain a balance sheet that is characterized by strong liquidity and asset quality, ready access to external funding sources at competitive rates and a strong capital structure that supports our risk-taking activities and is adequate to absorb potential losses. In managing the balance sheet, appropriate consideration is given to balancing the competing needs of maintaining sufficient levels of liquidity and complying with applicable regulations and supervisory expectations while optimizing profitability.
At June 30, 2025, total assets were $486 billion, compared with $416 billion at Dec. 31, 2024. The increase in total assets was primarily driven by higher interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve and other central banks, securities and federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements, partially offset by lower trading assets. Deposits totaled $346 billion at June 30, 2025, compared with $290 billion at Dec. 31, 2024. The increase reflects higher interest-bearing deposits and noninterest-bearing deposits. Total interest-bearing deposits as a percentage of total interest-earning assets were 66% at June 30, 2025 and 65% at Dec. 31, 2024.
At June 30, 2025, available funds totaled $199 billion and included cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Reserve and other central banks, interest-bearing deposits with banks and federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements. This compares with available funds of $144 billion at Dec. 31, 2024. Total available funds as a percentage of total assets was 41% at June 30, 2025 and 35% at Dec. 31, 2024. For additional information on our available funds, see “Liquidity and dividends.”
Securities were $147 billion, or 30% of total assets, at June 30, 2025, compared with $137 billion, or 33% of total assets, at Dec. 31, 2024. The increase primarily reflects higher U.S. Treasury, non-U.S. government and unrealized pre-tax gains in the first six months of 2025, partially offset by lower U.S. government agencies. For additional information on our securities portfolio, see “Securities” and Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Loans were $73 billion, or 15% of total assets, at June 30, 2025, compared with $72 billion, or 17% of total assets, at Dec. 31, 2024. The increase was primarily driven by higher margin loans. For additional information on our loan portfolio, see “Loans” and Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Long-term debt totaled $33 billion at June 30, 2025 and $31 billion at Dec. 31, 2024. Issuances and an increase in the fair value of hedged long‐term debt were partially offset by maturities and redemptions. For additional information on long-term debt, see “Liquidity and dividends.”
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation total shareholders’ equity totaled $44 billion at June 30, 2025 and $41 billion at Dec. 31, 2024. For additional information, see “Capital.”
Country risk exposure
The following table presents BNY’s top 10 exposure by country (excluding the U.S.) as of June 30, 2025, as well as certain countries with higher risk profiles. The exposure is presented on an internal risk management basis and has not been reduced by the allowance for credit losses. We monitor our exposure to these and other countries as part of our internal country risk management process.
The country risk exposure below reflects the Company’s risk to an immediate default of the counterparty or obligor based on the country of residence of the entity which incurs the liability. If there is credit risk mitigation, the country of residence of the entity providing the risk mitigation is the country of risk. The country of risk for securities is generally based on the domicile of the issuer of the security. The country risk exposure below does not reflect exposure that might arise from certain commitments and contingent liabilities set forth in Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
BNY 23
| Country risk exposure at June 30, 2025 · Interest-bearing deposits · Total exposure | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in billions) · Central banks · Banks · Lending (a) · Securities (b) · Other (c) | ||||||
| Top 10 country exposure: | ||||||
| Germany | $16.2 | $0.3 | $0.7 | $3.6 | $0.2 | $21.0 |
| United Kingdom (“UK”) | 10.3 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 6.7 | 1.7 | 20.5 |
| Japan | 6.4 | 0.9 | — | 0.5 | 0.3 | 8.1 |
| Canada | — | 1.0 | — | 4.1 | 1.9 | 7.0 |
| Netherlands | 1.9 | — | 0.4 | 3.2 | 0.1 | 5.6 |
| Belgium | 3.3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 5.3 |
| France | — | — | 0.2 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 4.0 |
| Australia | — | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 3.5 |
| Luxembourg | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 3.2 |
| South Korea | 0.1 | — | 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 3.1 |
| Total Top 10 country exposure | $38.4 | $5.5 | $6.6 | $23.4 | $7.4 | $81.3(d) |
| Select country exposure: | ||||||
| Brazil | $— | $— | $1.1 | $0.1 | $0.2 | $1.4 |
| Russia | — | 1.0(e) | — | — | — | 1.0 |
(a) Lending includes loans, acceptances, issued letters of credit, net of participations, and lending-related commitments.
(b) Securities include both the available-for-sale and held-to-maturity portfolios.
(c) Other exposure includes over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivative and securities financing transactions, net of collateral.
(d) The top 10 country exposure comprises 65% of our total non-U.S. exposure.
(e) Represents cash balances with exposure to Russia.
We have exposure to certain countries with higher risk profiles. The country risk exposure to Brazil is primarily short-term trade finance loans extended to large financial institutions. We also have operations in Brazil providing investment services and investment management services.
The war in Ukraine has increased our focus on Russia. The country risk exposure to Russia consists of cash balances related to our Securities Services businesses and may increase in the future to the extent cash is allocated for the benefit of our clients that is subject to distribution restrictions. BNY has ceased new banking business in Russia and suspended investment management purchases of Russian securities.
Russian securities included in our AUC/A and AUM at June 30, 2025 continue to be insignificant as a percentage of the total AUC/A and AUM, respectively. We will continue to work with multinational clients that depend on our custody and recordkeeping services to manage their exposures.
We are monitoring our exposure to Israel as part of our internal country risk management process. At June 30, 2025, our total exposure to Israel was $323 million and primarily consisted of investment grade short-term interest-bearing deposits and OTC derivatives maturing within six months.
Securities
In the discussion of our securities portfolio, we have included certain credit ratings information because the information can indicate the degree of credit risk to which we are exposed. Significant changes in ratings classifications could indicate increased credit risk for us and could be accompanied by an increase in the allowance for credit losses and/or a reduction in the fair value of our securities portfolio.
24 BNY
The following table shows the distribution of our total securities portfolio.
| Securities portfolio · March 31, 2025 · 2Q25change inunrealizedgain (loss) · June 30, 2025 · Fair value as a % of amortizedcost (a) · Unrealized(loss) · % Floatingrate (b) · Ratings (c) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBB+/BBB- · BB+andlower | ||||||||||||
| (dollars in millions) · Fairvalue · Amortizedcost (a) · Fairvalue · AAA/AA- · A+/A- · Notrated | ||||||||||||
| Agency residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) | $44,912 | $204 | $47,440 | $44,277 | 93% | $(3,163) | 20% | 100% | —% | —% | —% | —% |
| Non-U.S. government (d) | 33,025 | 191 | 34,090 | 34,047 | 100 | (43) | 24 | 94 | 4 | 2 | — | — |
| U.S. Treasury | 27,898 | 62 | 30,068 | 29,732 | 99 | (336) | 41 | 100 | — | — | — | — |
| Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) | 10,197 | 51 | 10,272 | 9,935 | 97 | (337) | 44 | 100 | — | — | — | — |
| Foreign covered bonds (e) | 7,856 | 27 | 8,460 | 8,443 | 100 | (17) | 36 | 100 | — | — | — | — |
| Collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) | 7,844 | 10 | 8,062 | 8,061 | 100 | (1) | 100 | 100 | — | — | — | — |
| U.S. government agencies | 5,391 | 32 | 5,139 | 4,906 | 95 | (233) | 24 | 100 | — | — | — | — |
| Non-agency commercial MBS | 2,458 | 19 | 2,486 | 2,369 | 95 | (117) | 48 | 100 | — | — | — | — |
| Non-agency RMBS | 1,445 | 3 | 1,567 | 1,427 | 91 | (140) | 39 | 100 | — | — | — | — |
| Other asset-backed securities (“ABS”) | 499 | 5 | 454 | 426 | 94 | (28) | 20 | 100 | — | — | — | — |
| Other debt securities | 10 | — | 11 | 10 | 91 | (1) | — | — | — | — | — | 100 |
| Total securities | $141,535 | $604 | $148,049 | $143,633 | 97% | $(4,416)(f) | 33% | 99% | 1% | —% | —% | —% |
(a) Amortized cost includes the impact of hedged item basis adjustments, which was a net decrease of $901 million, and is net of the allowance for credit losses.
(b) Includes the impact of hedges.
(c) Represents ratings by Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) or the equivalent.
(d) Includes supranational securities. Primarily consists of exposure to the UK, France, Germany and the Netherlands.
(e) Primarily consists of exposure to Canada, the UK, the Netherlands and Germany.
(f) At June 30, 2025, includes pre-tax net unrealized losses of $981 million related to available-for-sale securities, net of hedges, and $3,435 million related to held-to-maturity securities. The after-tax unrealized losses, net of hedges, related to available-for-sale securities is $746 million and the after-tax equivalent related to held-to-maturity securities is $2,621 million.
The fair value of our securities portfolio was $143.6 billion at June 30, 2025, compared with $132.1 billion at Dec. 31, 2024. The increase primarily reflects higher U.S. Treasury, non-U.S. government and unrealized pre-tax gains in the first six months of 2025, partially offset by lower U.S. government agencies.
At June 30, 2025, the securities portfolio had a net unrealized loss, including the impact of related hedges, of $4.4 billion, compared with $6.2 billion at Dec. 31, 2024. The improvement in the unrealized loss, including the impact of related hedges, primarily reflects the impact of lower interest rates.
The fair value of the available-for-sale securities totaled $98.7 billion at June 30, 2025, or 69% of the securities portfolio. The fair value of the held-to-maturity securities totaled $45.0 billion at June 30, 2025, or 31% of the securities portfolio.
The unrealized loss (after-tax) on our available-for-sale securities portfolio, net of hedges, included in accumulated other comprehensive income was $746 million at June 30, 2025, compared with $1.2 billion at Dec. 31, 2024. The improvement in the net unrealized loss, including the impact of hedges, primarily reflects the impact of lower interest rates.
At June 30, 2025, 99% of the securities in our portfolio were rated AAA/AA-, unchanged compared with Dec. 31, 2024.
See Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the pre-tax net securities gains (losses) by security type. See Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for securities by level in the fair value hierarchy.
BNY 25
The following table presents the net premium (discount) and net amortization (accretion) related to the securities portfolio.
| Net premium (discount) and net amortization (accretion) related to the securities portfolio (a) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| (in millions) | 2Q25 | 1Q25 | 2Q24 |
| Net purchase premium (discount) that is amortizable (accretable) | $(1,289) | $(1,285) | $344 |
| Net amortization (accretion) (b) | $(45) | $(24) | $9 |
(a) Amortization of purchase premium decreases net interest income while accretion of discount increases net interest income. Both were recorded on a level yield basis.
(b) Including the impact of the accretion of discontinued hedges, there was a net accretion of $105 million in the second quarter of 2025, $82 million in the first quarter of 2025 and $25 million in the second quarter of 2024.
Loans
| Total exposure – consolidated | June 30, 2025 | Dec. 31, 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (in billions) | Loans | Unfundedcommitments | Totalexposure | Loans | Unfundedcommitments | Totalexposure |
| Financial institutions | $13.1 | $35.3 | $48.4 | $13.2 | $35.2 | $48.4 |
| Commercial | 1.3 | 12.1 | 13.4 | 1.4 | 11.9 | 13.3 |
| Wealth management loans | 9.2 | 0.7 | 9.9 | 8.7 | 0.7 | 9.4 |
| Wealth management mortgages | 8.8 | 0.2 | 9.0 | 8.9 | 0.2 | 9.1 |
| Commercial real estate | 6.9 | 3.0 | 9.9 | 6.8 | 3.1 | 9.9 |
| Lease financings | 0.2 | — | 0.2 | 0.6 | — | 0.6 |
| Other residential mortgages | 1.4 | — | 1.4 | 1.1 | — | 1.1 |
| Overdrafts | 3.2 | — | 3.2 | 3.5 | — | 3.5 |
| Capital call financing | 5.1 | 3.0 | 8.1 | 5.2 | 3.1 | 8.3 |
| Other | 3.6 | — | 3.6 | 3.1 | — | 3.1 |
| Margin loans | 20.3 | 0.4 | 20.7 | 19.1 | — | 19.1 |
| Total | $73.1 | $54.7 | $127.8 | $71.6 | $54.2 | $125.8 |
At June 30, 2025, our total lending-related exposure was $127.8 billion, an increase of 2%, compared with Dec. 31, 2024, primarily reflecting higher exposure in the margin loans, wealth management loans and the other loans portfolios, partially offset by lower lease financings.
Our financial institutions and commercial portfolios comprise our largest concentrated risk. These portfolios comprised 48% of our total exposure at June 30, 2025 and 49% at Dec. 31, 2024. Additionally, most of our overdrafts relate to financial institutions.
Financial institutions
The financial institutions portfolio is shown below.
| Financial institutionsportfolio exposure(dollars in billions) · June 30, 2025 · Dec. 31, 2024 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loans · Unfundedcommitments · Totalexposure · % Inv.grade · % due<1 yr. · Loans · Unfundedcommitments · Totalexposure | ||||||||
| Securities industry | $3.3 | $20.1 | $23.4 | 100% | 99% | $2.3 | $20.3 | $22.6 |
| Asset managers | 1.7 | 8.1 | 9.8 | 96 | 74 | 1.8 | 8.4 | 10.2 |
| Banks | 7.9 | 1.6 | 9.5 | 84 | 94 | 8.9 | 1.4 | 10.3 |
| Insurance | 0.1 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 100 | 8 | — | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Government | — | 0.6 | 0.6 | 100 | 18 | — | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Other | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 100 | 39 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.7 |
| Total | $13.1 | $35.3 | $48.4 | 96% | 83% | $13.2 | $35.2 | $48.4 |
The financial institutions portfolio exposure was $48.4 billion at June 30, 2025 and Dec. 31, 2024, reflecting higher exposure in the securities industry
portfolio, offset by lower exposure in the banks portfolio.
26 BNY
Financial institution exposures are high quality, with 96% of the exposures meeting the investment grade equivalent criteria of our internal credit rating classification at June 30, 2025. Each customer is assigned an internal credit rating, which is mapped to an equivalent external rating agency grade based upon a number of dimensions, which are continually evaluated and may change over time. For ratings of non-U.S. counterparties, our internal credit rating is generally capped at a rating equivalent to the sovereign rating of the country where the counterparty resides, regardless of the internal credit rating assigned to the counterparty or the underlying collateral.
The exposure to financial institutions is generally short term, with 83% of the exposures expiring within one year. At June 30, 2025 and Dec. 31, 2024, 18% of the exposure to financial institutions had an expiration within 90 days.
In addition, 68% of the financial institutions exposure was secured at June 30, 2025. For example, securities industry clients and asset managers often borrow against marketable securities held in custody.
At June 30, 2025, the secured intraday credit provided to dealers in connection with their tri-party repo activity totaled $13.5 billion and was included in the securities industry portfolio. Dealers secure the outstanding intraday credit with high-quality liquid collateral having a market value in excess of the amount of the outstanding credit. Secured intraday credit facilities represent 28% of the exposure in the financial institutions portfolio and are reviewed and reapproved annually.
Our banks portfolio exposure primarily relates to our global trade finance. These exposures are short term in nature, with 94% due in less than one year. The investment grade percentage of our banks exposure was 84% at June 30, 2025, compared with 85% at Dec. 31, 2024. Our non-investment grade exposures are primarily trade finance loans in Brazil.
The asset managers portfolio exposure is high quality, with 96% of the exposures meeting our investment grade equivalent ratings criteria as of June 30, 2025. These exposures are generally short-term liquidity facilities, with the majority to regulated mutual funds.
Commercial
The commercial portfolio is presented below.
| Commercial portfolio exposure · June 30, 2025 · Dec. 31, 2024 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (dollars in billions) | Loans | Unfundedcommitments | Totalexposure | % Inv.grade | % due<1 yr. | Loans | Unfundedcommitments | Totalexposure |
| Energy and utilities | $0.1 | $4.2 | $4.3 | 93% | 5% | $0.2 | $4.1 | $4.3 |
| Services and other | 0.8 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 98 | 28 | 0.7 | 3.5 | 4.2 |
| Manufacturing | 0.3 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 97 | 15 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Media and telecom | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 81 | — | — | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Total | $1.3 | $12.1 | $13.4 | 95% | 15% | $1.4 | $11.9 | $13.3 |
The commercial portfolio exposure was $13.4 billion at June 30, 2025, an increase of 1% from Dec. 31, 2024, driven by higher exposure in the manufacturing portfolio.
Our credit strategy is to focus on investment grade clients that are active users of our non-credit services. The following table summarizes the percentage of the financial institutions and commercial portfolio exposures that are investment grade.
| Percentage of the portfolios that are investment grade | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quarter ended | |||||
| June 30, 2025 · March 31, 2025 · Dec. 31, 2024 · Sept. 30, 2024 · June 30, 2024 | |||||
| Financial institutions | 96% | 96% | 96% | 96% | 97% |
| Commercial | 95% | 96% | 96% | 97% | 96% |
Wealth management loans
Our wealth management loan exposure was $9.9 billion at June 30, 2025, compared with $9.4 billion at Dec. 31, 2024. Wealth management loans primarily consist of loans to high-net-worth
BNY 27 individuals, a majority of which are secured by the customers’ investment management accounts or custody accounts.
Wealth management mortgages
Our wealth management mortgage exposure was $9.0 billion at June 30, 2025, compared with $9.1 billion at Dec. 31, 2024. Wealth management mortgages primarily consist of loans to high-net-worth individuals, which are secured by residential property. Wealth management mortgages are
primarily interest-only, adjustable-rate mortgages with a weighted-average loan-to-value ratio of 61% at origination. Less than 1% of the mortgages were past due at June 30, 2025.
At June 30, 2025, the wealth management mortgage portfolio consisted of the following geographic concentrations: California – 20%; New York – 14%; Florida – 11%; Massachusetts – 8%; and other – 47%.
Commercial real estate
The composition of the commercial real estate portfolio by asset class, including percentage secured, is presented below.
| Composition of commercial real estate portfolio by asset class | June 30, 2025 | Dec. 31, 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Totalexposure | Percentagesecured (a) | Totalexposure | Percentagesecured (a) | |
| (in billions) | ||||
| Residential | $4.3 | 88% | $4.2 | 88% |
| Office | 2.4 | 75 | 2.4 | 75 |
| Retail | 0.8 | 61 | 0.7 | 58 |
| Mixed use | 0.7 | 32 | 0.7 | 32 |
| Healthcare | 0.7 | 44 | 0.7 | 43 |
| Hotels | 0.6 | 35 | 0.6 | 33 |
| Other | 0.4 | 63 | 0.6 | 65 |
| Total commercial real estate | $9.9 | 71% | $9.9 | 71% |
(a) Represents the percentage of exposure secured by real estate in each asset class.
Our commercial real estate exposure totaled $9.9 billion at June 30, 2025 and Dec. 31, 2024. Our income-producing commercial real estate facilities are focused on experienced owners and are structured with moderate leverage based on existing cash flows. Our commercial real estate lending activities also include construction and renovation facilities. Our client base consists of experienced developers and long-term holders of real estate assets. Loans are approved on the basis of existing or projected cash flows and supported by appraisals and knowledge of local market conditions. Development loans are structured with moderate leverage and, in many instances, involve some level of recourse to the developer.
At June 30, 2025, the unsecured portfolio consisted of real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) and real estate operating companies, which are both primarily investment grade.
At June 30, 2025, our commercial real estate portfolio consisted of the following concentrations: New York
metro – 34%; REITs and real estate operating companies – 28%; and other – 38%.
Lease financings
The lease financings portfolio exposure totaled $154 million at June 30, 2025, compared with $603 million at Dec. 31, 2024. At June 30, 2025, all of leasing exposure was investment grade, or investment grade equivalent, and consisted of exposures backed by well-diversified assets, primarily concentrated in the U.S.
Other residential mortgages
The other residential mortgages portfolio primarily consists of 1-4 family residential mortgage loans and totaled $1.4 billion at June 30, 2025, compared with $1.1 billion at Dec. 31, 2024.
28 BNY
Overdrafts
Overdrafts primarily relate to custody and securities clearance clients and are generally repaid within two business days.
Capital call financing
Capital call financing includes loans to private equity funds that are secured by the fund investors’ capital commitments and the funds’ rights to call capital.
Other loans
Other loans primarily include loans to consumers that are fully collateralized with equities, mutual funds and fixed-income securities.
Margin loans
Margin loan exposure of $20.7 billion at June 30, 2025, compared with $19.1 billion at Dec. 31, 2024
was collateralized with marketable securities. Borrowers are required to maintain a daily collateral margin in excess of 100% of the value of the loan. Margin loans included $8 billion at June 30, 2025 and Dec. 31, 2024, related to a term loan program that offers fully collateralized loans to broker-dealers.
Allowance for credit losses
Our credit strategy is to focus on investment grade clients who are active users of our non-credit services. Our primary exposure to the credit risk of a customer consists of funded loans, unfunded contractual commitments to lend, standby letters of credit and overdrafts associated with our custody and securities clearance businesses.
The following table details changes in our allowance for credit losses.
| Allowance for credit losses activity | June 30, 2025 | March 31, 2025 | Dec. 31, 2024 | June 30, 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (dollars in millions) | ||||
| Beginning balance of allowance for credit losses | $401 | $392 | $401 | $440 |
| Provision for credit losses | (17) | 18 | 20 | — |
| Net (charge-offs) recoveries: | ||||
| Loans: | ||||
| Commercial real estate | (5) | (10) | (29) | (43) |
| Other residential mortgages | — | 1 | — | — |
| Other financial instruments | — | — | — | (1) |
| Net (charge-offs) | (5) | (9) | (29) | (44) |
| Ending balance of allowance for credit losses | $379 | $401 | $392 | $396 |
| Allowance for loan losses | $275 | $295 | $294 | $286 |
| Allowance for lending-related commitments | 70 | 75 | 72 | 73 |
| Allowance for other financial instruments (a) | 34 | 31 | 26 | 37 |
| Total allowance for credit losses | $379 | $401 | $392 | $396 |
| Total loans, at period end | $73,096 | $71,404 | $71,570 | $70,642 |
| Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans | 0.38% | 0.41% | 0.41% | 0.40% |
| Allowance for loan losses and lending-related commitments as a percentage of total loans | 0.47% | 0.52% | 0.51% | 0.51% |
(a) Includes allowance for credit losses on federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements, available-for-sale securities, held-to-maturity securities, accounts receivable, cash and due from banks and interest-bearing deposits with banks.
Provision for credit losses was a benefit of $17 million in the second quarter of 2025, primarily driven by property-specific reserve releases in our commercial real estate portfolio.
The allowance for loan losses and the allowance for lending-related commitments represent
management’s estimate of lifetime expected losses in our credit portfolio. This evaluation process is subject to numerous estimates and judgments. To the extent actual results differ from forecasts or management’s judgment, the allowance for credit losses may be greater or less than future charge-offs.
BNY 29
Based on an evaluation of the allowance for credit losses as discussed in “Critical accounting estimates” in our 2024 Annual Report, we have allocated our allowance for loans and lending-related commitments as presented below.
| Allocation of allowance for loan losses and lending-related commitments (a) | June 30, 2025 | March 31, 2025 | Dec. 31, 2024 | June 30, 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (dollars in millions) | $ | % | $ | % | $ | % | $ | % |
| Commercial real estate | $291 | 84% | $326 | 88% | $315 | 86% | $298 | 83% |
| Financial institutions | 25 | 7 | 16 | 4 | 19 | 5 | 21 | 6 |
| Commercial | 13 | 4 | 15 | 4 | 20 | 5 | 27 | 7 |
| Capital call financing | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| Wealth management mortgages | 6 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 1 |
| Other residential mortgages | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| Wealth management loans | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Total | $345 | 100% | $370 | 100% | $366 | 100% | $359 | 100% |
(a) The allowance allocated to lease financing, margin loans, overdrafts and other loans was insignificant at June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025, Dec. 31, 2024 and June 30, 2024. We have rarely suffered a loss on these types of loans.
The allocation of the allowance for credit losses is inherently judgmental, and the entire allowance for credit losses is available to absorb credit losses regardless of the nature of the losses.
Our allowance for credit losses is sensitive to a number of inputs, most notably the macroeconomic forecast assumptions that are incorporated into our estimate of credit losses through the expected life of the loan portfolio, as well as credit ratings assigned to each borrower. As the macroeconomic environment and related forecasts change, the allowance for credit losses may change materially. The following sensitivity analyses do not represent management’s expectations of the deterioration of our portfolios or the economic environment, but are provided as hypothetical scenarios to assess the sensitivity of the allowance for credit losses to changes in key inputs. If commercial real estate property values were increased 10% and all other credits were rated one grade better, the quantitative allowance would have decreased by $45 million, and if commercial real estate property values were decreased 10% and all other credits were rated one grade worse, the quantitative allowance would have increased by $85 million. Our multi-scenario-based macroeconomic forecast used in determining the June 30, 2025 allowance for credit losses consisted of three scenarios. The baseline scenario reflects slowing GDP growth through the end of 2025 before accelerating next year, slightly increasing unemployment through the end of 2025 and stable commercial real estate prices through the end of 2025. The upside scenario reflects higher GDP growth through the end of 2025 before moderating, declining unemployment through the end of 2025 and slightly increasing commercial real estate prices
through the end of 2025 compared with the baseline. The downside scenario contemplates negative GDP growth through the end of 2025, rapidly increasing unemployment through the end of 2025 and sharply lower commercial real estate prices through the end of 2025 compared with the baseline. At June 30, 2025, we placed equal weighting on our baseline and downside scenarios, with the remaining weighting placed on the upside scenario. From a sensitivity perspective, at June 30, 2025, if we had applied 100% weighting to the downside scenario, the allowance for credit losses would have been approximately $108 million higher.
Nonperforming assets
The table below presents our nonperforming assets.
| Nonperforming assets | June 30, 2025 | Dec. 31, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| (dollars in millions) | ||
| Nonperforming loans: | ||
| Commercial real estate | $131 | $143 |
| Other residential mortgages | 18 | 19 |
| Wealth management mortgages | 10 | 15 |
| Total nonperforming loans | 159 | 177 |
| Other assets owned | 2 | 2 |
| Total nonperforming assets | $161 | $179 |
| Nonperforming assets ratio | 0.22% | 0.25% |
| Allowance for loan losses/nonperforming loans | 173.0 | 166.1 |
| Allowance for loan losses/nonperforming assets | 170.8 | 164.2 |
| Allowance for loan losses and lending-related commitments/nonperforming loans | 217.0 | 206.8 |
| Allowance for loan losses and lending-related commitments/nonperforming assets | 214.3 | 204.5 |
30 BNY
Deposits
Total deposits were $346.4 billion at June 30, 2025, an increase of 20%, compared with $289.5 billion at Dec. 31, 2024. The increase reflects higher interest-bearing deposits and noninterest-bearing deposits.
Noninterest-bearing deposits were $67.7 billion at June 30, 2025, compared with $58.3 billion at Dec. 31, 2024. Interest-bearing deposits were primarily demand deposits and totaled $278.7 billion at June 30, 2025, compared with $231.3 billion at Dec. 31, 2024.
Short-term borrowings
We fund our operations primarily through deposits and, to a lesser extent, other short-term borrowings and long-term debt. Short-term borrowings consist of federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements, payables to customers and broker-dealers, commercial paper and other borrowed funds. Certain short-term borrowings, for example, securities sold under repurchase agreements, require the delivery of securities as collateral.
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under repurchase agreements include repurchase agreement activity with the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (“FICC”), where we record interest expense on a gross basis, but the ending and average balances reflect the impact of offsetting under enforceable netting agreements. This activity primarily relates to government securities collateralized resale and repurchase agreements executed with clients that are novated to and settle with the FICC.
Payables to customers and broker-dealers represent funds awaiting reinvestment and short sale proceeds payable on demand. Payables to customers and broker-dealers are driven by customer trading activity and market volatility.
The Bank of New York Mellon issues commercial paper that matures within 397 days from the date of issue and is not redeemable prior to maturity or subject to voluntary prepayment.
Other borrowed funds primarily include borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank, overdrafts of sub-custodian account balances in our Securities Services businesses and borrowings under lines of credit by our Pershing subsidiaries. Overdrafts typically relate to timing differences for settlements.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.